to understand what is going to start a business. that is why it did so well. >> gabrielle, you have written three books. what is that experience like that for you? >> the hardest thing about is writing a back. that's what i want to do is write a book one day. i decided if i wanted to be taken seriously as an expert, i was going to have to do the research, and do the study and by writing three books about millennials, i have found inside an experience, interviewing for example, for my last book, the millennial entrepreneur, i discovered what makes the next generation of entrepreneurs tick. i discovered the fears of failure and success our generation faces, because of that i cannot only connect with fellow entrepreneurs but my passion is to raise a new generations of entrepreneurs to millennials is any fears from the adults late in life who decide they want to become business owners and not work for anyone? >> i think they're similar. i think a lot of people want to relate to be their own boss and freedom of their own time. >> armstro

on the other side understand. i think that's what he is rallying against is the influence of people like goldman sachs and some of the big tankers who are major supporters of hillary clinton and knowing her history, she can be bought. i assume that is what they are planning for it. something good will happen for them when she gets into office. she does talk one way and she talks to wall street internally she talks a different way as well. and. gary: that's something we pointed out on the show many times as we have been in the private meeting to secretary clinton in the wall street meetings as well as a public forum. i want to talk about the business environment. i have listened you i think for the last eight years talk about how the regulatory environment is so hard for business. can you let the viewers who are thinking about who they are going vote for in a couple of weeks no exact date with the climate is a business and why it's so difficult? >> well let me put it to you this way. when you speak about business i

to understand her anatomy. this is one thing why they delay. they are it as long as possible. to be fully confident that that is who they are. there are a lot of kids who test boundaries and boys that like to dress up as girls these are temporary. these are things that are experimenting. a child who says at the age of two window get to be a girl and says it constantly and consistently that's that the transgender child. she is also the co- author of the survival guide for the teenage brain. they won the pulitzer prize. it was for a series called the wreck of the lady mary. it was based on the sinking of a scallop boat. in 2009. six of the seven crew died. the accident happened so quickly thank you to know what happen. so the story was a narrative about what happened to these men and their families but also an investigation.so an they make the case they were the victims of a high state run. it didn't stop. it is a mystery and it's an investigation at story about people. they also spent nine years as a fact checker. a little bit of her career but coming nicole.ca it's a book we'v

the ability to understand that i made a a mistake. the business opportunity didn't work like i thought it would be. how you can i capitalize on this scenario to i can improve for the future. as a younger guy you are mentioning, as a younger guy, mentor ship matters because i need to make up the experience gap to make up, to make up the mistakes i may make. experience, and mentorship, that is what matters to me, because -- gabrielle knows my business partner lives in the netherlands. he is ten years 90 elder but his experience -- 10 years my old e, and but his experience has sharpened me that learning from >> armstrong: i'm armstrong williams and and this the "right side forum." ? ? ? >>> nicole, let me ask you this, why is there such an emphasis on women in your business? >> because i think that when women win, we all win. i think that women are still aren't paid equally for equal work. women don't have the same access to capital to start businesses. so the more that we can lift women up, it actually helps all that is why we decided t

the ability to understand that i made a a mistake. the business opportunity didn't work like i thought it would be. how you can i capitalize on this scenario to i can improve for the future. as a younger guy you are mentioning, as a younger guy, mentor ship matters because i need to make up the experience gap to make the mistakes i may make. experience, and mentorship, that is what matters to me, because -- gabrielle knows my business partner lives in the netherlands. he is ten years 90 elder but his experience -- 10 years my old e, and but his experience has sharpened me that learning from ? girl: you're going to need me. you're going to need us. ? all of us. ? you're going to need our technical skills... our math, our engineering skills. ? you're going to need our help with your water... your air, your food. you're going to need our organizational skills... our problem-solving skills. you're going to need our determination, our honesty, our compassion. you're going to need the next generation of leaders promise we'll be there when y

number two, understand how your agency can be more effective. there is so much that we do that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do. there are great programs out there that are not effective because they are not run well or they don't have the technology or the tools so my advice is listen to your people in an organized way develop an agenda of the five pillars and then communicate it out to your people and let them know they are part of it. as a career person, one of the things that surprised me the most when i came in, i've never been called anything but buy my first name and i started walking to meetings and people would refer to me in the third person that were sitting next to me and it was a strange thing. i realized there was a degree to which people didn't address you. my entire company knows my e-mail. they are fine for sending me unhappy e-mails and that's kind of how i learned. it's hard to tap into that so what i would do if you see and openness as a career person, figure out how to be creative in getting the recommend

fortunately, i understand it.illary clinton says donald trump represents the same rig system he is running to change. ms. clinton: well millions of american families, including

and also physiological tests, you know, to understand her anatomy. but it was mostly a series of psychological test and this is one thing why they delay puberty and suppress puberty so that the child can live as the gender that they believe they are for as long as possible, to be fully confident that that's who they are. look, there are a lot of kids who test the boundaries, and boys to like to dress up as girls and girls that were tomboys, and these are temporary. these are things that are experimented. not all children who do that or transgender, but a child who sits at the age of two when do i get to be a girl, and has a constantly and consistently, that's a transgender child. >> host: amy ellis nutt is the author of "becoming nicole: the transformation of an american family." she's also a co-author of the teenage brain, she won the pulitzer prize while working at the ledger for what? >> guest: it was for a series called the wreck of the lady mary. it was a story, true story based on the sinking of a boat off the coast of cape made in 2009. six of

they have to understand the impact. it's hard to have a conversation about it when we're talking on two different planes. i think it's possible but i think nationally we need to think about how to have that conversation. i think law faculty can advocate for shared governance and collaboration of these things. i'm not suggesting they need to be the same. i agree with the keynote earlier today about different sanctions may require different possible sanctions may require different processes, i'm not suggesting one process. i think faculty need to review their home institution procedures. and really the way i see this is that, you know, earlier one of our presenters said that it's not about the process, it's about the harm. and i agree with that. for people to see the harm they need to understand that some of the processes are being used in different ways. for me the entry point might be let's look at the processes and let's understand how this is impacting everybody and let's figure out how we can make decisions for ourse

people can understand and help people understand what these steps are.hat happens when they do conflict. if the title nine results result in dismissal, or does not. that's interesting to me. does that mean at berkeley they needed to negotiate the faculty process because agreeing to whatever sanction was imposed or how do they do that simultaneously. in kansas, the administration wanted to make the faculty processes conform but the faculty pushed back. penn state's hr policy gives the panel some control to say this is victimizing. i think requiring clear and convincing evidence we need this if we don't have this, we're going to need procedural irregularities. instead of a standard that's criminalize i criminalizing. confrontation in the hearing. they even said, if you need more, there might be more required. use of technology. trog torys for people who choose not to attend. posing questions throughout. i think more freedom for advisers would be helpful if those are trained advisers who understand these issues, it means they're advocating on their behalf,

and i always thought which always that would understand what to do so. so after the days of violations of the treatment -- a region anticipated enough is enough's. as of of pressure of the opposition to major that dave will be felt tight and be separated and this problem now that unless you focus what did this that it cannot be constructive. but when it comes to a grievance -- agreements is a different story. >> but i want to add that that it is a result of the unfriendly actions of the united states. >> i know. first, i have to explain. russia and the united states has produced for weapons purposes. and some 12 years ago we start to negotiate and agree because of what we produce to for the purposes and would be a eliminated between the scientist and diplomats and discuss how to eliminate that. because it is reversible. and then learn about that and nuclear reactors. there up to my eyes with that kind of functions. so to tell them that we will build a reactor that will be very well designed with that process of elimination. we have to build a facility an

on the other side understand. i think that's what he is rallying against is the influence of people like goldman sachs and some of the big tankers who are major supporters of hillary clinton and knowing her history, she can be bought. i assume that is what they are planning for it. something good will happen for them when she gets into office. she does talk one way and she talks to wall street internally she talks a different way as well. and. gary: that's something we pointed out on the show many times as we have been in the private meeting to secretary clinton in the wall street meetings as well as a public forum. i want to talk about the business environment. i have listened you i think for the last eight years talk about how the regulatory environment is so hard for business. can you let the viewers who are thinking about who they are going vote for in a couple of weeks no exact date with the climate is a business and why it's so difficult? >> well let me put it to you this way. when you speak about business i

people can understand and help people understand what these steps are.hat happens when they do conflict. if the title nine results result in dismissal, or does not. that's interesting to me. does that mean at berkeley they needed to negotiate the faculty process because agreeing to whatever sanction was imposed or how do they do that simultaneously. in kansas, the administration wanted to make the faculty processes conform but the faculty pushed back. penn state's hr policy gives the panel some control to say this is victimizing. i think requiring clear and convincing evidence we need this if we don't have this, we're going to need procedural irregularities. instead of a standard that's criminalize i criminalizing. confrontation in the hearing. they even said, if you need more, there might be more required. use of technology. trog torys for people who choose not to attend. posing questions throughout. i think more freedom for advisers would be helpful if those are trained advisers who understand these issues, it means they're advocating on their behalf,

and so we wanted to understand race, we wanted to understand what the racial dynamics were as well as the social class dynamics that might be leading to these inequalities. so we thought mr. weber's invitation to come in was a great opportunity to look at what was going on more generally. so we started with the black students, and we actually wound up interviewing about 171 people in the community including students, planters -- parents, community members, teachers, administrators, staff members to really get a complete picture of what was happening in the context. >> host: walk us through some of your findings. >> guest: well, one of the things that really struck us coming into this was we really wanted to understand what was racial about these inequalities. there's all this research that talks about race and what it means and trying to understand it, and one of the first things that we wanted to understand is this idea of oppositional culture. there's this idea that black and latino students are somehow uninvested in school, uninvested in education and that their peers criticize the

on the other side understand. i think that's what he is rallying against is the influence of people like goldman sachs and some of the big tankers who are major supporters of hillary clinton and knowing her history, she can be bought. i assume that is what they are planning for it. something good will happen for them when she gets into office. she does talk one way and she talks to wall street internally she talks a different way as well. and. gary: that's something we pointed out on the show many times as we have been in the private meeting to secretary clinton in the wall street meetings as well as a public forum. i want to talk about the business environment. i have listened you i think for the last eight years talk about how the regulatory environment is so hard for business. can you let the viewers who are thinking about who they are going vote for in a couple of weeks no exact date with the climate is a business and why it's so difficult? >> well let me put it to you this way. when you speak about business i

we're just beginning to understand it. if my interest and give me time to read about the internet, it's necessary for me to have a glossary or lexicon of terms. you know the phrase it's all greek to me, that is misleading because if there is a greek word you can look it up and you can understand what it means. but when he read about the cyber age and they tell you what it means it's hard for people of my generation to understand it. >> there's a very good book that i recommend, there's an article in the new york review of books just a few weeks ago by edward -- who is a historian and humanities professor at columbia university. he reviews five books about the internet. it is an article itself worth reading it is so scholarly. he talks about two books, one is by professor harcourt who teaches law. he talks about, and the book is called exposed, desire and disobedience in the internet. many in the modern age tend to confuses selfie and yourself. the self is an idea, a projection, a promise that you have formed over your past

that was hard for me to understand. because when i would ask the children, let's talk about college, i'm not going to college. why aren't you going to college? because we don't go to college around here. you're going to go to college. you're going to have the opportunity. monday lopez i'm not going to college. i'm going to go to the school up the block. that's what we do. so luckily there was a young man by the name of marlin peterson who is actually mentioned the book as well, and marlin had serve ten years in prison. he was with the wrong friends and had made the wrong decision and he had to serve ten years, and through his time incarcerated, while i was at the first school, i told him, i don't want your time there to be spent in vain. so i need you to communicate to my kids, to explain to them why they should never end up in jail. because your story is more powerful than me telling them they shouldn't go there. so, literally marlin would write them letters and i would read the letters and they would write him back an

he simply does not understand our system, our constitution. he doesn't seek to understand it. i don't think he cares about it. it's about himself. and that is a problem. we are strong in this country because of our ideals and because, to the degree we have, we honor our constitution. i think we have gotten off track on that. but we would certainly be off track with donald trump as president. and we would continue on a dangerous track with hillary clinton, i believe. - his lack of fitness, is it about temperament? is it about qualifications in the sense of preparation and knowledge about the issues that matter? we hear a lot about fitness these days. "he's unfit to be president. "she's unfit to be." what do you mean by that? that's a word that may be defined differently by different people. - well, i think different things go into that. i think temperament is one. experience is another. and i would say judgment is the third. we need those things. i come from a national security background, but it doesn't only apply to national security. it does apply, though, very seriously whe

i had no understanding. dick knew everything. so christie would be somebody that would have had some knowledge of washington and the kind of things that need to happen and so forth and so on. so it's not somebody with his current challenges that's driving behavior. in other words, he is conflicted. can he be governor and this? can he be dealing with his legal problems and also do this? he is not being asked to do this. that's somebody else. >> i just want to say, just to follow up on the point you made, mack, which is i think the fundamental issue that both candidates ought to be judged by is whether they're doing the things that need to happen for them to be prepared to be president if they're selected. and i think that's the purpose of this exercise is to understand that, you know, promises are only as good as your ability to get them done. the transition is about your ability to run the government from the beginning. and that's both the national security imperative as well as an imperative if you expect to meet the commitments

so i understand. why do you think it has been so difficult to get mental health parity and treatment for mental health issues? they can be chronic problems, i understand. but, you know, diabetes, congestive heart failure, they are all chronic problems. i think we all know probably the answer. but in your experience, why are we still struggling to be able to have parity in how people are treated because they happen to have a mental health issue? >> i think the tradition in medicine is to have things siloed up. not have people in the same place, not sharing the same emr, and not talking about these things. diabetes, cardiovascular disease, heart failure has an incidence of depression. if somebody has an ami and they are depressed and you don't recognize it, they will have higher mortality. not because of their physiology. not because they don't do their cardiac rehab. we need to screen throughout health plans members. ideally you follow up in primary care clinics. you don't have to get somebody to go to

a two year old boy being constructed understand black and white to choose the site.i was in construction for a came of age. for so long all i could think about was prison not realizing i was in prison before incarceration, and they still languish behind invisible bars. i keep asking if this is a to tell the of my life. true i am on the outside but white inside is tangled up. if life is history, how can i ever hope to escape this? whether i choose acknowledge the box or not, other people will and there's no escaping this distinction. in other words, allow me to paraphrase thought for a minute. who says -- uttered the word free, man was no longer free because he's need to be identified as freight proved he was change. i say i am free every day, but really how free and my? and so that becomes the correspondence between me and linda, linda and i. there's actually, you know, a few pieces i ask to go into the industrial complex, i talk about my time in incarceration. made i will read a little piece of that before going into the last thing i wanted to read. let me see if i

don't understand it. >> terrible. >> does anyone understand this? these women. just given bill's vulnerabilities, it was part of his political operation, to discredit and basically smear these women, when they got in the way. a lot were telling the truth. but prosecuting that in a way that doesn't make -- make it seem as though you're blaming hillary for bill's infidelities is going to be really difficult. it opens up a can of worms for trump and every surrogate who may have had is open up his base. he needs republican women in his camp. going after a woman that basically said, my marriage is important. my family is important. i mean, that's really hard for him -- >> the people at the top of the campaign. dave bochy has been talking about clinton's personal life for a quarter century. it is no surprise they say, what inspires us to say clinton shouldn't be back in the white house? no surprise they'd be tempted to turn to this. argument, that they've been around? >> the number one concern, which goes to what mark said, you talk to the clinton campaig

. >> i understand -- >> understand why you -- he won't pay taxes. >> i understand why you want to change the subject. let me be very clear son this russia thing the larger -- >> do you think -- the question is -- what we're dealing with is -- there's old proverb that says russian bear never dies it just hibernates. the truth of the matter is we can affect this foreign policy of hillary clinton and barack obama has awakened an aggression in russia that appeared a few years ago with the move in georgia you now move in to crimeia and all the while, all we do is fold our arms say, we're not having talks any more. to answer your question, we just need american strength.

understandable. but here is now johnson began. >> i would like everyone to know i have a wonderful family, son eric, daughter, granddaughter, and fiance, best friend kate. it's best to be in love and i'm in love. john: i'm happy he's in love but i can't believe that's the first thing he said when he had an opportunity to introduce freedom to people. >> on one hand i think that's a missed the opportunities. on the other the reputation of libertarians is we are basically robots that say the word liberty over and over. maybe he's not wrong to talk about the cheesy part of the family. he's a politician and politicians will always break your heart. particularly if you are a libertarian. when he was governor he either was a little bit of crony capitalism under this administration. he increased the tax credit for fill makers to come to the state. john: he cut the income tax and capital gains tax and state tax. >> he was dr. no. he said that's not okay and i don't approve of that. 750 vetoes shows gary johns

all understandable whether you are connected to the individual or not. and they're very similar. when i'm talking to the family members of those who have been lost, that pain runs deep. and everyone can relate to that. what i've seen also is we've not let those divide us. this is a moment in time and it's our moment in time. not only is the country watch, but the world is watching how we deal with this issue. do we let it divide us. do we let it keep ah part or do we use these tragic incidents as a bridge to discussion and understanding and confront these difficult issues? we're at a point, and i liken it very much to the point 50 years ago in the civil rights movement when finally the television cameras came to so many cities and showed the reality of what was happening in so many communities of color. and the country finally saw what people have been speaking of for generations. and the world saw. and that's where we are today. and as painful and as difficult as it is to see these incidents, it's allowed us to move beyond the point of having to prove that there is a problem or

and that became the beginning of her odyssey to understanding. she had never heard the word transgender, and so it began -- she began to become a student of it and to understand it to try and bring her husband into it. it took her longer to do that. it took him longer. but he's probably the one who undergoes the most transformation in the book. he's now someone who goes out and gives talks to people about transgender kids, transgender children and being transgender and especially is helping to try to work with fathers to understand their children. >> host: what about the other twin boy? be. >> guest: jonas is a remarkable kid. they are both now entering their sophomore year at college at two different branches of the university of maine. what was wonderful about jonas is that jonas really probably knew before anyone, you know? kids would come up to him, and they would sometimes say to himu you know, what is it like to have a transgender sister. and, you know, he didn't know. he just knew he had a twin that was really a girl, not a boy. and when j

in the post-civil war era you have to understand the civil war first, and understand our history. that started when i was at eeoc, i wanted to understand the founding better. i hired a couple of guys, young men from claremont. i wasn't planning on being a judge, i just wanted to understand our founding. as a part of that you read civil war history, you read the lincoln-douglas debates, all sorts of things. i thought it would be important for my clerks to go, not just talk about the 14th amendment, not just talk about the equal protection clause, not just talks about substantive due process, but to go and feel it. to see the place, what was this about, why did people die? to go where lincoln delivered the gettysburg address. where he implores them, the living, to make it worthwhile, this experiment. these people who are given the last full measure. also, it is the end of the term. at the end of the term, you could be a little bit upset. [laughter] people can become -- kids can see how the sausage is made, and become a little bit cynical, a little bit jaded. i always thought it was

more than we think they understand.ten to this. 1.8 million people are dead. but they are registered to vote, some of whom vote even though they are dead which is really a hard thing to do. but it's easy if fraud is involved, right? you have 1.8 million people who are dead who are registered to vote. and some of them vote. one was a republican, and after death became a democrat. it's true. 2.8 million people are registered in more than one state. they got 2.8 million people that can vote in ohio and someplace else. and 14% of noncitizens are registered to vote. and then i hear we have such a beautiful -- everything so wonderful -- you understand where i'm coming from, i think, right? now, i am not a politician, so i can say it like it is. but those are terrible -- those are terrible and frightening statistics. america is a constitutional republic with a system of laws. these laws are triggered in the case of fraud or in the event of a recount where it is needed. of course, i would accept a clear election result, but i w

you have to understand -- saying something else. you have to understand there is one president and we serve at the pleasure of the president. the one thing you have to understand is whether or not the arees relating your agency aligned with the president, that is the agenda you are driving. the other thing that i sperry and was that there was an assumption that as a junior person called and said you had to do this, we had to jump up and salute. the president hired me to run this agency. we have a policy person called d you had to do this, we had to staff. do we agree or disagree? if we disagree i call and say "i understand you are going in this direction. i think it is important to think about it this way. " >> how did that turn out? steve preston: usually extremely well. if we did not get to where we were going, we talked about the issues and got aligned. importanteam, it is to have alignment and communication, a process you understand. i think it is important to have agency heads that are competent that can communicate a vision an

moderator: i understand that. if you saw somebody else with these high-level investigations, would you not be concerned? the state of massachusetts look ed at it. mr. babeu: that is different than what you said. they found there was nothing there -- [speaking simultaneously] moderator: the same question goes to you. how would you feel about a candidate running for office who critics say is picking apart -- mr. o'halloran: i would say this, what have they done? if they have taken a look at their party and said, i think you are wrong and i going to -- i'm going to make sure that children are protected over the fact you are threatening to take chairmanship away i would trust , that. i would trust my past actions and we need to understand that paul lied. moderator: we have to stop there. we have to get the closing statements. each candidate will now have a one minute closing statement. going in reverse order of the opening statements. mr. babeu: it is a great honor to serve our community and state to put arizona first

i can understand it in some ways. i don't excuse it. so he pix up on a strain of humor that i think people might resinate with him in mark twain who was a figure and he said he read in every year of his life, i think he just had a lot of fun in life. he was incredibly prolific. i cannot imagine having to kind of work ethic he did and he was clever and funny and so, anyway, i read -- been reading off and on since i was a graduate student in baltimore and i -- a lot of baltimore stayed with me and this is a way to sort of work out that part of my personal experience. >> host: so mencken active in the 1930's? >> he started in the teens at baltimore morning harold, i believe. gradually he started editing, coed iting a magazine, literary magazine with george mason and eventually he founded the american mercury, published and he -- by that time he was a notable american, celebrity, popularity declined in the 30's because he was quite critical of the new deal in fdr and sometimes made fun of americans at a time when they didn't want to be made

really have an understanding of the way they understand it. there was really a sense in which there was a lot of discussion at throughout the day. it is kind of an energy school for many of us in the audience. they really understood the way that the security constraint discount works. they really understand the way that organized markets work. that might be the biggest surprise that there was really a high level of understanding of those issues. >> raise your hand out in the audience again if you are a lawyer. we had been told not to get too into the legal lease the panel of judges was a ported --dash appointed by the republican president. unlike congress that doesn't necessarily mean they will go for the clean power plant. or that they will automatically oppose it it certainly gives you a sense of where they are at where they asked some of these questions. judge gripped that the first thing he said it was was the first thing out of the gate. they are already facing all of these. given he is one of the appointed judges. in my notetaking i real

do they understand they're losing? >> you know, i'm not sure they do. i thing there's two things going on. when i talked to them, two things come out. one, trump psychologically just can never be on the defensive. he won't allow himself to be, right? so the more -- the more serious and plentiful the charges of groping, or sexual improprieies or whatever, the more aggressively he's going to hit back. that's just trump's nature. the other thing i think we got to talk about is look who is in trump's inner circle. bannon, david bosse, kelly kellyanne conway. they are all specialists in clinton scandals. there is no analogous category on the left. like you can't be a lefty who spends his life, like, doing bush scandals or romney scandals. it just doesn't exist. >> right. >> you can make a career for yourself specializing in clinton scandals. here we are in the last 30 days of the campaign, trump is desperate. these guys have his ear and conservatives have wanted for two decades now to relitigate both clintons over their sex scandals and now is their moment.

how the data works, you have a deep understanding of what it means. there's always this debate about how much do you put yourself in the position of -- sometimes people want to shoot the messenger. if you push too hard, if you try too hard, you get folks to be statistically correct and understanding the data in a right way. a candidate like trump might say he doesn't want to listen to you anymore at all. so is it better to soft pedal through this, and make sure that he's still listening to you, so that you can try to influence him if you're on the inside. i would certainly love to see kellyanne come out and say yes, i understand these polls are wrong, because i think she knows they are. but trump is the kind of candidate that's very hard to control. >> i've asked news outlets, they're going to keep posting these surveys. so far it seems they will, which is part of the problem. part of the problem is news outlets giving credibility to these uncredible polls. do you see the clinton campaign or democrats doing the same kind of misleading thing with polls

. >> i understand they're intending to fill from the notch above the first building. >> that's correct. >> on the rear yard is 45 percent. >> 45 for that and 15 feet or 25 percent whither is greater. >> the impact on the window is not significant. >> because it is maintaining a separation the initial proposal there say, i think about a 3 and a half 3 foot 3 separation within the property line and the subject this wall that is maintained the previous proposal so you get to build within that area in terms of the stairs that connected the 2 story to the proposed 3 story had them keep it within the footprint and not expand beyond the footprint of the existing building. >> that didn't change from the current time. >> right for the project a we've heard. >> commissioner swig. >> so i'll concerned about the owner of hardship and hardship goes both ways i'm a homeowner and have bought and sold a couple of homes in any life one of the things when i buy a home you do due diligence and do cc&rs and add ones to previous permits and something like that. >> buy our house fort richardson but looking