can you understand why that is? can you understand why they are offended to be on the receiving end of a breach months after the fact where they may have lost tens to hundreds of millions of dollars? >> i understand your point senator. i only ask for pension. i have waived my bonus. worked for-- i have months off of generosity. you don't need to answer the question i'm not trying to personalize it, i am talking culturally. big business in the country. i'd like to talk about one policy issue before you move forward. the idea that credit reporting agencies will give consumers the ofht to request a locking access to credit policies, ask no cost to them, can you pledge, years ofs, that five now, equifax will not be charging consumers to lock and unlock their credit files? would you be opposed to congress ?roviding a law >> thank you. expected to lean in that direction, where consumers can lock their files, we want to make that free for life. >> thank you senator young. senator cantwell. cantwell: thank you, we have had

i understand and i was the only child growing up.ove the art and the changes that it goes through. the truth as you look at it and you go, this may hurt or not. i can bring something to this or not and there is other guys that's better than me on this. >> i am curious -- how did you know that since you had to play off of, you are talking to yourself. >> i still do. my wife says, who are you talking to. >> you are growing up the only child, how did you know that being a thespian was your calling. >> i did not see any theaters. i used to go to my father who was the only child also, i said dad, i am bored and he said go watch the ants so i would go outside and lie down like this and i would watch the ants for hours. >> yeah. >> what did you see? >> i saw a community. >> yeah. >> i saw help and i saw ants dragging huge objects and sometimes other ants and grass hoppers and inflicted the ant hill a little bit and they rebuilt it. >> i get up and i crush it. [ laughter ] >> i ask that question because i figured there maybe and there was a

>> said is my understanding, yes.i believe the president has article to authority only. >> thank you. i want to get to what happened in niger. and sort of understand where we are because there is also limitations on the introduction of troops under the war powers 60 days.ting it to as i understand it, our troops in northern africa a been there much longer than 60 days. can you explain briefly what our mission was in niger when the tragedy occurred, and underwent legal authority those troops were there? drugs i can, senator. the troops are there under title 10. in a train and advise role. the letter from president obama and the 13 to the president pro tem of the senate, then speaker of the house, talks to the full number of u.s. military deployed 100. in 2013 was in furtherance of u.s. national security interests was president obama's report to you. that continues to be the case at this time. >> but the specific mission they were participating in as i understand it when beyond that. am i wrong and that? >> the mission

>>i'm not sure i understand your question. >> i understand her question. i think she's asking -- >> my translator. >> we approve the order of abatement, and we give a 60-day stay. i'm making this up for the purpose of the question. we reduce the fee instead of nine times. commissioner walker wants to know if they choose to go to the planning department to revert back to commercial, is there a way the landlord can be penalized. that was her question. >> thank you. >> we're offering a bridge up-front, which we normally don't do. >> i think we're looking for a solution, which i don't know if this body has the jurisdiction to make that call. >> exactly. >> we don't. to try to incentivize them. from the look on your face, i'm thinking there is not a way to do that. >> it's incentivizing something. >> reduce the fees? >> or don't. i think we should discuss the fees. just because other commissioners are shaking their heads. >> i appreciate that commissioner mccarthy is trying to incentivize and show support for this moving forward, but i do believe having the fee

. >> my understanding -- >> it just changes everyday, mr. chairman. >> my understanding is that we're going to have a . . 's at some point, fairly soon, senate republicans are going to propose a repeal of the individual mandate under the affordable care act. that means that the tax bill is going to hit the american people with a health care double whammy. first, the congressional budget office announced today that if the republican tax bill passes, it would trigger a sequester that would result in $25 billion in cuts to medicare. now, on top of that blow, to vulnerable senior citizens, according to the congressional budget office, your change that will be getting later today will cause millions to lose their health care and millions more to pay higher premiums. all to pay for yet more tax breaks for multinationals. now, in addition to the serious harm to seniors, and the middle class, our view is that this is a violation of committee practice. there was no amendment filed that in any way addressed the individual mandate or the affordable car

is that what i understand? okay. if they are a registered 501(c)(3) compliant nonprofit organization that does that, they are -- and they sustained damage and they provide those critical facilities they should be eligible under public assistan assistance. if they're not, that might be where the discrepancy is, if they're not registered but we would be happy to look into that as well. >> well, let's check on both things, if you will, on the last one first. >> sure. >> there was a specific appropriation after sandy, that's what caught my eye. >> okay. >> so i'm not sure why that was deemed necessary but it certainly was helpful. >> okay. >> and it may or may not be indicated in our present situation. and then as regards the reporting, we do have earlier reporting on katrina and rita and the level of assaults that followed those disasters and so somebody somewhere should be monitoring this and i understand you have shared responsibility but there, too, i'd appreciate your getting back to the committee as to what kind of

i understand, mr. alexander and everyone, depending on which side you are on, there has got to be a balance to be had here. i don't know why we can't find that balance, why it's always either one side or the other, why we are divided as a nation, why we are divided as a people. it always come down to what side are you on? people have asked me, what's your politics? i said you ought to ask me what my purpose of being in the political process. you should care less whether we're democrats or republicans. i want a strong country. it can only be strong if we're energy independent. if you want to set the technology standards of the rest of the world you better develop them right here. for the last eight years we never developed and spent anything in research to try to find ways of using oil and natural gas in a cleaner way. people say, i want outliall renewbles. i say, fine. tell me what five hours of the day you wants your refrigerator or heat or air-condition to work. that's what you're going to get. mr. s

i can understand that. i absolutely -- i can understand. what merkel said is she , and weod the message have to do our jobs here, and we take cares here is to of our own problems, and to take care of our own problems is to moreogether again one time, together, unified. that is the way. union is the way. separation is not the way. has movedt is why she the way to lead a european union of defense. let's see where it goes. let's see where it goes. principle that this is necessary, this is the first time i have heard because after something -- some sympathetic movement, but i did not see any money. you put the money and you believe. like money isks going to be on the table to lead, to identify, determine common technologies, determine how to build up the industry with a particular these of each ofntry, -- particularities each country, but this is along the commonality of interest. this is very good for nato as well, not only for the europeans. of the aspect of your question, this is something that everybody asks himself. in spain, somebody is a

can you understand that? why that would offend the sensibilities of americans for them to be on the receiving end of a data breach and within months somebody leaves with tens of millions, maybe hundreds of millions of dollars? >> i understand your point, senator. as i said in prior testimonies, i have left with nothing except the pension. i asked for nothing. i waived my bonus. there is no equity coming next year. i am working for three to six months as long as needed for he free in an advisory capacity. what i am walking away with, which was disclosed in the proxy, is my pension. >> miss mayer, you don't need to answer the question. i don't need to personalize it. i'm talking culturally in this country, big business. i would like to touch on something else. the idea that credit reporting agencies moving forward will give consumers the right to request a locking of access to their credit files at no cost to them. can you pledge, mr. barros, that five years from now equifax won't be charging consumers to lock

i know thaw understand like i understand the challenges involved there. what can you -- can you tell me what doj has done in upping the prosecutions and the investigations for anti-trafficking? >> we believe strongly that we can do even more. it's been a priority for a number of years. i was recently in the minnesota u.s. attorney's office and they had a major international case and i was surprised how much money was involved. almost as much as drug dealers may make. we had a recent report of our people meeting with the child exportation group. my associate attorney general number three, rachel brand is interested in this and i empo r empowered her to be engaged in advancing our efforts in this regard. she is enthusiastically responding to that. >> for i may make a suggestion as well, several years ago, we in the middle district of pennsylvania prosecuted one of the biggest sex trafficking cases on the east coast. obviously and for the most part involving women and very young girls. we had a good conviction. people went away for 30 or 40 years. one of the

i know you understand like i understand, the challenges involved. can you tell me what the doj has done in helping the prosecutions and investigations for anti-trafficking? mr. sessions: we believe strongly that we can do even more. it has been our priority for a number of years. there was a major international case in minnesota and i was surprised how much money was involved. we have a recent report of our people meeting with a transportation group. i have empowered rachel brand to be engaged in advancing efforts in this regard. she has enthusiastically responded. >> if i might make a suggestion. several it years ago, we in pennsylvania prosecuted one of the biggest sex trafficking cases on the east coast obviously for the most part involving women and very young girls. good conviction, people went away for 30 or 40 years. but one of the areas that we have to help more with the victims is the protection side of things. during investigation and during the trial, but subsequent to the convictions. these women and children are not forgotten and protec

i understand. you know it does meeting with ambassador kislyak during the republican national convention, correct? >> i remember i made the speech. he came up to me afterwards that i was standing in front of the speaker program and did chat with him. >> thank you. you -- >> not a meeting. it was just an encounter at the time. >> you also met with the ambassador in september 2016 sn your office as you the knowledge. >> was he asked for an appointment. i to senior staffers both full colonels in the united states army, retired. it and i had a meeting with -- >> you testified in june before the senate intelligence committee that you had not heard even a whisper about possible russian involvement in the trump campaign. yet we understand that you attended this march 31 meeting with george papadopoulos, talk about potential communications with russian operatives, but also according to your third quarter 2016 campaign you hosted at dinner meeting on june 302016 at the capital club, is at right? >> that's c

>> as i understand it, united states i would dive into the policy papers and descriptions but as i understand it, the concern is right now the system is such did a variety of other factors that when somebody does come in illegally they are detained and sometimes their detained for quite a long period of time as you know. >> of running out of time so as to one more question. do you agree with a policy that would expedite deportation of unaccompanied minors who are coming from the central american countries? >> i believe in reuniting children with their families. if their families are not here -- >> are you saying you would deport those children to reunite with her family said actually put those children in the process of fleeing violence and what those children to be safe and in the united states? >> in the case i would want to work with you to understand more about the implications. >> thank you. >> i apologize for taking out of order. >> that's all fine and appreciate it very much. i appreciate the chance to have a second round of questions. ms. nielsen, i just wanted to start by expressing

we educate them to understand the platform. you. >> had the documentation as to how they were directed in this, on these particular ads that you were paid for that we have a concern about? >> we have -- yeah, we have some documentation around how we were selling to them the products. >> congressman, all of the ads that we've disclosed to the committee and that we're concerned with were purchased via self-serve ad platform, there was no human interaction with any of advertisers? the ads that were served like all ads go through automated review. it's in looking at those we identified areas for improvement in terms of tightening our ad guidelines. >> excuse me. my understanding is it's $100,000. for your process, i didn't say it was an individual. with your process, there is a targeting or a selection that occurs. everybody didn't see these ads. how did facebook once receiving these payments, take this content and determine who was and who was not to see it? >> the self-serve ad permit platform allows a user to submit targeting. o

i understand the point that you're making, and i understand that because we had a similar incident in miami, and that incident was prosecuted criminally. people died. a boiler blew up. there was a flash steam blew up and people died. it was prosecuted criminally. and so, i am very much aware of the importance of vigorous prosecution, particularly as i said earlier when addressing one of your colleagues, when violations are repeated and when violations are willful. and so, cynical or not, this is something that we take very seriously. with respect to the particular rule that you're addressing, we're looking at that rule. we are balancing the issues of privacy, because it was asking for some information that was very detailed and that identified individuals with the needs to get information so that we can engage in appropriate and targeted enforcement. we are moving forward on that, but that does not lessen the seriousness with which we will take instances in tlparticular that are repeated and that are willful and i'm perfectly fine referring them to criminal prosecution. as a matter of

we all have a better understanding what we're doing. we're at a point i think we can come to result. let me see if i can summarize a little bit. the suggestion has been made by several of you, dr. rueben specifically, one approach would be to separate the pell grant, which would be 30 or 40% of the 20 million applications filled out every year. that's a lot of applications, 7 or 8 million, ask three questions, all of which could be incorporated from the internal revenue service people had reported. and let an applicant know, a, if you're eligible for a pell grant and, b, the amount. with that same sort of procedure, you could let a person know that before they are admitted to college, so they can use that money to shop around and you can let them know in the seventh, eighth and ninth grade and raise their sights a little higher, i might be able to afford this. the average pell grant is about the same amount as the average community college tuition in the country. all this talk about extense of going to to college, there is an expense bu

i'm trying to understand is that yes or no when you try to understand yourself to be a neutral public forum? >> we don't think of it in the terms of neutral because what we are trying to do is provide each user a personalized news feed that will be the content that's most interesting to that user that within the boundaries that i described, open to all ideas without regard to the viewpoint or ideology. >> free expression and free speech is at the core of the mission and we do everything we can to balance things like said the violent threat or abuse and harassment that we believe it is one that is important. >> if i could ask a final question i'm at the end of my time. >> i'm not going to object that i would like to have a chance to ask a question. on the scale of the political debate and shifting it in the ways that are consistent in the political viewand thepolitical e employees. the >> we think of ourselves as a platform for all ideas and aspire to that. we are aware of the possibility of conscious bias across a range of issues, not just politics and we train our employees on that p

your understanding? >> for the ads that we have disclosed to the committee? >> so far, the ones you know about so far. >> i'm not aware of the techniques having been used. i would have to kmek to confirm. >> for all of you, what's the loikly hood there's a lot of the ads still out there that you haven't found? >> we feel we have done an extensive are view for the period. that we chose around the election. we're working on it. >> if you had to bet something that you own that you really like, what are the odds there are adds out there. >> there's some likelihood. i feel like we have done an extensive review. >> something you really like. >> i share mr. edgers concern. and in particular in light of the ability to share threat information. it's possible there will be more that we discover. >> that could be there now. out there now, right? those ads are on the facebook. >> certainly not associated with this cluster of accounts. we are focusing significant efforts on prevents this sort of bhair going forward.

i know that you understand, like i understand, the challenges involved there. what -- can you tell me what the d.o.j. has done in upping the prosecutions and the investigations for anti-trafficking? >> we believe strongly that we can do even more. it's been a priority for a number of years. i was recently in the minnesota united states attorneys office. they had a major international case and i was surprised how much money was involved. almost as much as drug dealers may make. we have a recent report of our people meeting with the child exploitation group. my associate attorney general, number 3, rachel brand, is very interested in this. i've empowered her to be engaged in our efforts in this regard, and she's enthusiastically responding to that. >> if i may make a suggestion as well, several years ago we in the middle district of pennsylvania prosecuted one of the biggest sex trafficking cases on the east coast. obviously and for the most part involving women and very young girls. we had a good conviction. these people went away for 30 or 40 years. but one of

i think they're searching for it, not that they're not understanding it. for it. and i think at some point they'll land on it. so, just in a nutshell, what would you say his underlying philosophy is that underpins what you think should be done in terms of the friction? first of — well, first of all, you have to have a commitment to reconciliation. you have to have a commitment, because that determines everything, how you approach things. you have to have a commitment to win—win. you can't have a commitment to winning over people, but winning people over. but, i mean, clearly, things are not going in the right direction... i would disagree. this is what you said quite recently, "we are heading to race riots if we are not careful. we just can't keep this divisiveness going." but you said... "if" is a keyword, because it does not translate into "it will." we have the opportunity to turn things around. if people do not pause and really study dr king, we could end there. i will say it until the cows come home. he was a prophet, he was a prophet notjust to this

>> my understanding that changes every day, mr. chairman. >> my understanding is that of modification -- >> mr. chairman, i want everybody to understand because senate speak is a little hard to follow. what's now been confirmed at some point fairly soon, senate republicans are going to propose a repeal of the individual mandate under the affordable care act. that means a tax bill is going to hit the american people without health care double whammy. first, the congressional budget office that it's republican tax bill passes, it would trigger that would result in $25 billion in cuts to medicare. now on top of that blow, the vulnerable senior citizens party to the congressional budget office, your change that will be getting later today will cause millions to lose their health care and millions more in to pay higher premiums, all to pay for yet more tax breaks for multinationals. now in addition to the serious harm to seniors and the middle class, our view is that this is a violation of committee does. there is no amendment filed tha

i want to understand because my constituents, the people i talk to at my town hall meetings can't understand how you go about getting both your content and person who is your user. comes to find out being patriotic is one of those forms that is russia and was paid for by rubles. isn't that a red flag? how could that happen? how do you bet your conten ventd users? the >> you've identified two extremely important areas of investment for us, and opportunities for us to do better. so, just on the ad side, we are tightening the policies. all ads on facebook go through a combination of automated and manual review. we are tightening the tools to make sure that the ads that are on potentially socially divisive topics get a heightened review. >> i only have a short period of time so i want to know who are above batters is it content analysts and if so, who are these people, are they experts, and how dangerous are they? the reason i ask is if you look at the organic postings it also turns out to be a fake facebook page done by one of those russian school forms and that is trying to incite racial animo

i do not quite understand it. he was the differences between the services they could be getting at ucsf versus [inaudible] because now brown and tolan is not going to be admitting or referring to cpmc facilities, so if they are doing that and they are guiding patient to their healthcare needs and to a facility, could that be part of the education process? >> absolutely. dr. laos who's been here in the house, she has been spearheading the effort the trio transition for members and they have gone through the exact same transition. as i mentioned, for another carrier. as well as calpers calpers does the same thing. so they actually hired hardcoded into the system where certain services should be directed. so that education is there. she is also identified obs with a certain referral pattern and she had suggested that we actually use some of those as highlighting during our oe meetings. does that make sense? >> yes. >> all right. thank you. any other questions. commissioner lim >> on your last like communication tylan

articulated the ideas a little bit better because i could understand how fans of could that be to the ukrainians. for sure it is a learning process i think the ukrainians have to learn all the self's this one of the difficulties i remember by first the easy deal for a kind of independent ukraine and i met my reason vice president of the ukrainian government he was speaking to be international language and at this at moment to when we started out of fiscal talks now is to switch to see the korean language for me it was not the difference because i neither know russian nor know the ukrainian language so for i think this is mirroring the difficulties they have with themselves and their perception and also me as a that is one of the critiques and doing to the russians. i think. the old situations are coming back and the stand pulte in them that i understand the russia is they are not in favor that nato is coming directly to the border of russia you know i'm fully sharing your of this opinion that it was a mistake to do so. but on the other side i think. they came back and the old impressi

mcclintock: i understand the liquidity concerns. again, we have to recognize part of those were pre-existing and the result of bad decisions by the puerto rican government. during the hearings on promisa, i understand is00,000 fled the island -- 100,000 fled the island since the disaster but the fact many were fleeing from it before. during the hearings on promisa i pointed out that puerto rico is the cruise ship destination. it should be the gem of the caribbean. people should be flocking to it, not fleeing from it. again, not acts of god but acts of government. what can the federal government do long term in terms of the overall policies? the jones act have been mentioned. federal changes that could restore the prosperity that puerto rico should naturally enjoy? ms. jaresko: first, it would be the response of the devastation. i think the extent to which you help rebuild the public sector and fema and h.u.d. and other there indeed. regard reform, you lead to -- design something that encourages u.s. companies to stay and even grow t

it must have been difficult understanding how the system worked.u mentioned one part where they didn't tell you where the cameras were in the room and if that were true, when i were undercover i would have been quite upset about it as well. >> guest: absolutely. you know, with your experience, you understand you know we like to be behind the scenes. i will walk into the compartment at the facility and get all of the classified information i need to come about to do our job it is you need it pattern so we want a full dump on the subjects. nothing is off-limits to us and it was our job as professional undercover is to put up a wall on the law enforcement side to the undercover side i'm not saying that it's right or wrong it is just different and i understand why they do it that way that they are treated differently in the sense that they are not giving anything behind the scenes because they don't want them to react to it. it's not anything i was used to so i was a little offended that i wasn't told these things. >> host: for more information i had t

i understand that.tephanie: okay, so we have to have a little bit of understanding for each other. nicolas: okay, well, tell that to the bank, tell that to the landlords, tell that to the people that call me for bills. tell that to all them. stephanie: nicolas. i don't want him to walk out that door because of this. please stop. please. i'm begging you. nicolas: you want all of the accolade without doing any of the work. stephanie: nicolas, she also went through a tough time in the last couple years. nicolas: yeah. we all did. stephanie: i don't want him to walk out that door because of this. please stop. please. i'm begging you. please. lemonis: i'm there to help fix the business. i'm not a therapist. and candidly, i'm embarrassed that he thinks it's okay to talk to his mother this way. and if i can't understand why he feels this way, i'm not sure that i can respect him in business. nicolas: this is a woman that was able to do anything. like, she could move mountains. lemonis: so, where it gets very bl

how were you able to understand. how can you understand western music at all i told them i think in their highest and purest form the arts and cultures of the world are very much related they have no geographical borders they are the spiritual property of mankind. solution later. it was music and bach's music him particular that enabled jew shalmi to deal with her dreadful experiences the pianist lived through all the excesses of the mt regime years of indoctrination five years of re education another five years locked up in a neighbor camp a shattered family hardship and harassment in one thousand nine hundred eighty she emigrated and finally found a new home in paris this film tells the story of her return to china as an internationally acclaimed interpreter of bach's music thirty five years after she left the country. should both be true about how what's the issue with the let's watch. this issue good has always been my favorite composer besides even in my early days to feature i have loved his been to highs a sin

i do not understand what is going on and do not understand what the accountability is. we have a federal financial oversight board -- maybe they are not doing their job, but somebody is not doing their job. would you agree? i see some heads nod. senator johnson: there is a governance issue. no doubt about it. senator peters. senator peters: we may be seeing a lot more of these disasters, bigger, stronger, increased frequency. it is important we take lessons learned and understand we are going to have to apply them going forward. mr. long, my time is short today, but i wanted to alert you i sent a letter to you yesterday. in that letter i asked a series of detailed questions about fema's response to maria and humanitarian crisis in puerto rico. i will not go into those details. the letter is going to you. i hope i had your commitment for a quick response because the select committee will have hearings. it will be helpful to frame the discussion. if i could have that letter entered into the record. mr. long: we will respond very quickly. senator peters: and as many of my

i want to understand because my constituents -- the people i talk to my town hall meetings can't understand how you go about vetting both your content and the person who is your user, comes to find out being patriotic is one of those troll farms that's russian. it was paid for -- the political ad was paid for by rubls. isn't that a red flag? how could that happen? how do you vet your content and how do you vet your users? >> you've identified two extremely important areas of investment for us and opportunities for us to do better. first, on the ad side we are tightening our policies all ads on facebook go through a combination of automated and manual review and we're tightening our tools to make sure that ads that are on potentially social divisive topics get heightened review. >> i only have a short period of time. so i want to know who are your vetters? is it content analysts? if so, who are these people? are they experts, average yo joes and how diverse are thooes vetters? the reason i ask, if you look at your organic postings, an example of that blackivist, also turns out to be a fake f

american conservatism could not understand itself in this way. america established itself on the grounds of the revolution. it celebrated the revolution as a great good for mankind. that defensive revolution was not a defensive established church, institutionalized asarchy, or the modern state immersed in the 19 century. the american revolution was understood as a political defense, a regime of civil and religious liberty in which the church could not defend upon government to enforce its claims , nor could government, limited by constitutional restraints, undermine the church or the traditions of the institutions of civil society. conservatism was not understood as merely a doctorate or even a dogma to be upheld intellectually as the antidote to liberalism. it was taught to be a political defense, the conventional way of life, one that preserved the best of the past as essential to that tradition. although america established itself on a revolutionary foundation, unlike france, it did not attempt to initiate a new order of things that would obli

i understand that. regular people do not understand that. and they shouldn't understand how you harm consumers, and then walk away with the amount of money that a small city or county uses for their annual operating budget. it is not fair and that is why this day is has an obligation to make a law, and not just drag you back and forth and wave our fingers that you. >> thank you, mr. chairman. let me start by asking this question. perhaps to mr. smith, and mr. mr. barros. my question is, before the equifax,occurred at with both companies, before this breaches occurred, what did you expect? what did you say to your executive committee or board of directors, what is the probability of a breach of occurring at our company? and the follow-up question, what is the probability today? you calculated what the problem -- you calculated what the probabilities were, is it any different today for a breach at either one of your companies that it was prior to the original breaches? framework like this. we do not calculate the percentage probability. get a

that's understandable. there was an interesting episode of the mystery of the buzzing places where they were very curious about these buzzing bumblebees zoom into the garden. we understand this to be in terms of trap lining behavior, marking different waypoints. they didn't know that. the ceremony of communication was a known so soccer trying to figure it out at an characteristic fashion charles darwin rallies the troops. he gets all the kids out there running around trying to mark the bees with loud to make it more visible zooming around trying to track them and understand what you're doing. years later later darwin had remembered his dad at that time in that study he was like a boy amongst other boys. he was just out there running around in the garden with the little ones calling around in the hedgerows and so on. there's one other episode a little glimpse here to share with you that says something about charles darwin in his relationship with his kids. this is a little note in a publication that you can

we are ready to listen to proposals and understand why people might want to think different. it is hard to understand why you would need to continue my metaphor, why you would need two different ways to get divorced. i will get in trouble if i miss q p. this weekend on the c-span networks, tonight at 9:15 on c-span, presidential speechwriters from nixon to obama. on then dr. anthony eichmann how your zip code impact your health. eastern,at 9:00 p.m. the news foundation editor in chief, christopher bedford on donald, the art of the lessons from america's philosopher in chief. on american history tv on c-span3, tonight at 8:00. -- 8:55 p.m. eastern. sunday at 9:10, the -- thereaking ceremony dwight d. eisenhower memorial in washington dc, this weekend on the c-span networks. with a busy week ahead for congress, we will have live coverage of two significant hearings, first, the senate banking committee considers jerome powell to be the next reserve.the -- federal reserve. health committee will consider his nomination at 9:30 a.m. eastern on c-span3, live coverage of two key hear

i understand it -- as understand it, there are very docific circumstances that not enable that information to be shared. if there are any, i will commit to you to come talk to about it and work out a solution together. >> will you commit to this committee, if confirmed, that you will make that interpretation, that that information will not be shared for law enforcement purposes, you will make that policy position clear? >> absolutely. >> thank you. at a september 27 hearing, i asked secretary duke to extend the october 5 through will deadline for daca recipients. it did not happen. it has been reported that werely 21,000 recipients not able to gather the documentation and $495 required before the deadline. reopenirmed, will you the application process, and allow this individuals the opportunity to renew their status? >> to you to look into it. i'm not familiar with the there areumbers, but circumstances we should take into consideration, i would look into those. i would urge you that part of the extenuating circumstances that should be taken into account is a national survey that found 57%

>> no, i do understand the concern, yeah. definitely. and then this brings us to -- so then if the solution is the warrant requirement, as we also discussed last night and have been talking about today so then we're putting a warrant requirement in by targeting nonu.s. persons. where no court has held that a warrant is required to do so and where we've been chastised for not connecting the dots in the past and i think that's the worry of the fbi here. but you should let them speak for themselves on that. and of course if your interested in the american and really to surveill the american, you'd have to go get a fisa warntd on that. i say on balance, at least from right now i don't think you should need a warrant to look at those already in the government's possession. >> if the government wants to read the content of communications, they can also just use the queries. so we're going to continue to put in these emergency provisions. i think there's plenty of authority under 215. to your credit you've acknowledged this is a valid concern.

i will say that we have to understand, be very measured, be very mature, and understand that these issuesnothing to do with the american people. these issues have nothing to do with the american goods. these issues have nothing to do with the american companies. quite the opposite. this is a moment where we have to be closer. this is a moment, an opportunity to show that together, we are better, that together we are more competitive, that together we have better creativity. so let's not be angry. let's be measured, let's be mature, and let's look at the positive side of all this. our thanks to all of our international friends, the consuls general of mexico, israel, and russia for taking their time to share their thoughts on building bridges of friendship. we invite you to become citizen diplomats, create your own events, small or large in your community, and please share those ideas and images with us on our social media sites. just go to our website, abc7news.com/community. we're also on facebook, @abc&communityaffairs, as well as @cheryljenningsabc7, and please follow me on twitter, @ch

help me understand, if i might, mr. stretch, you said these things are vial and upsetting and cynical and that you take responsibility for changing, yet, i am concerned we are now nearly a year after the election, 10 months after the election, september 6, facebook acknowledged $100,000 worth of ads were linked to russians linked to the kremlin. but if i understand your testimony today, 80,000 posts by the research agency were seen by 29 million americans and may have reached an estimated 126 million people. why has it taken facebook 11 months to come forward and help us understand the scope of this problem, see it clearly for the problem it is and begin to work in a responsible, legislative way to address it when former president obama cautioned your c.e.o. literally nine days after the election last november that this was a big problem and facebook needed to come forward? >> one clarification. when they met and spoke they were talking about facebook generally, not foreign countries but i think to understand what we no

i understand that.ve a little bit of understanding for each other. nicolas: okay, well, tell that to the bank, tell that to the landlords, tell that to the people that call me for bills. tell that to all them. stephanie: nicolas. i don't want him to walk out that door because of this. please stop. please. i'm begging you. retail. under pressure like never before. and it's connected technology that's moving companies forward fast. e-commerce. real time inventory. virtual changing rooms. that's why retailers rely on comcast business to deliver consistent network speed across multiple locations. every corporate office, warehouse and store near or far covered. leaving every competitor, threat and challenge outmaneuvered. comcast business outmaneuver. nicolas: you want all of the accolade without doing any of the work. stephanie: nicolas, she also went through a tough time in the last couple years. nicolas: yeah. we all did. stephanie: i don't want him to walk out that door because of this. please stop. plea

i understand the idea of getting it to the doorstep in a fast manner, but i also understand that you have security issues that arise with that. i also understand that from that, there arises the concern for -- how should i say this delicately? for abuse of the system because if someone is intended to have, and the way that this is -- predictable delivery works, is you're supposed to have an alfiatifiln of a brick and mortar retail, but from what we have from talking to individuals in the industry, that predictable delivery are going directly to the manufacturers and distributors and cutting out the brick and mortar, so that presents some issues. we'll have to come back to that. so what i appropriates is we split the file. make a motion to send the entire -- the edited version with the amendments that we made today with recommendation to the board tomorrow. >>supervisor fewer: yes, i agree. i also concur, that i think that the issue of delivery, we can speak about that at a later date, and -- and also, just get updated on where state legislation is and blah, blah, blah on that. >>supe

understand that. they shouldn't understand how you harm consumers and then walk away that small city or county uses for their annual operating budget. it's not fair and it's why we have an obligation to make a law. >> mr. by asking this question so as this determines probability. it makes the decisions about how to invest in this case the data security based on events happened. my question is, before the breach has occurred at adequate facts and with both companies, what did you expect and say to executive committee and your board of directors. the probability of a preacher crying in was that probability today to calculated what they were and made decisions about them is what the, but the as is it was different prior to the original breaches? >> we don't calculate the percentage probability, we have enterprise risk management for ten years as data security is the most high risk, high probability risk we have company. if we had cyber security event it be detrimental to the company. >> does that mean yo

so after rear so much makes us understand that they understand that there is no alternative to the peaceful path that's good and we hope that it will be. being for that very approach and yes we had a closed meeting during that meeting well i've been briefed by. the general secretary about the plans of china for the future of the mid term development for instance and that was important because just i've started talking about that now continue now because china is our biggest partner trade and comic partner it's important for us to understand what kind of wealth. development they want and soon they will be the first column a first global economy because they have six hundred something percent of growth annually. that's just inevitable there will be the biggest economy and we should understand how we will be adjusting our. work in trade with china taking into account the plans we have for development of the regular may community and coupling. our plans with the chinese plans for the silk road and. the strategy for the development of the relations was a neighbor police. committees paired off an

i just want to make sure i understand this. if i'm a current mcd operator, and i guess my current state license, and i chief 30% local hire, and i submit my equity plan, i can -- assuming we pass the plan as stated by supervisor peskin, and there is no -- i thought there was >> in the amendment to article 33, there are no additional notification requirements, and i'll defer to deputy city attorney wang, but my understanding is there's no additional notifications jane skbran what if a neighborhood wanted to appeal just the temporary expansion? is there an ability for them to do that? >> there would be no peal for the expansion. >> and they would be able to temporarily expand for a year? >> no -- well, the expansion as authorized would be for 120 days, which could be renewed by the director if the mcd is found to have been making good faith efforts to comply with their equity plans. >>supervisor kim: okay. why was a year mentioned for the temporary engs pangs if it's only 120 days. >> i don't know where a year was mentioned. >>su