it's like bait, it's a way to lure republicans into the uniparty. can you repeat this again?you have listened to this point, this is a key point, write this story down on the refrigerator. the military-industrial complex is the bait that swallows all this progressivist spending. in other words, they include various goodies for the pentagon. this attracts everyone who is in favor of the country’s defense, and thus gets their votes... but in the end, it hasn’t become safer, the army hasn’t become stronger, we can’t even cope with the houthis, whoever they are, so in fact, as is usually the case, the effect is exactly the opposite of what was stated, and no one notices this; anyone really believes that after all this funding our army has become stronger, no, it has become much weaker ; they believe that it has become stronger. according to some parameters, our weapons have become more advanced than before, but on the other hand, our combat effectiveness has decreased due to the recruitment problems that have been created by this administration, the way they advertise themselves,

it's like bait, it's a way to lure republicans into the uniparty. can you repeat this again?ve listened to this point, this is the key point, write this story down on the refrigerator. military-industrial complex is the very bait with which all these progressivist expenses are swallowed. in other words, they include various goodies for the pentagon. this is what attracts. our combat capability has been reduced because of the recruiting problems that have been created by this administration, the way they advertise themselves, the way they push the pentagon towards this whole agenda, wolf, all of this is alienating the potential target audience. yes, of course, even if we judge by the consequences, judge them by their fruits, in 2001 we started a war against. taliban, were they better armed then or now? they are the taliban, yes, they are better armed now. yes, the houthis. 5 years ago, most americans, including me, did not even know the word, and now they are blocking key shipping channels with the help of children's drones. yes, against the us imf. this, this is a failure. fa

starmer's labour and the rest of the uniparty regard tens of millions of born and bred british peoplecontempt, unbridled contempt, making him only the latest in a long line , only the latest in a long line, similarly minded decades of popular opposition to mass immigration. opposition dismissed and ignored by one government after another, has boiled over. there is no denying it. the unrest was predicted at least as long ago as the 1960s. what's not said often enough, however, alongside that truth, is that the unrest has proven surely beyond reasonable doubt to have been not collateral damage , some sort of unintended damage, some sort of unintended consequence born of well—meaning naivety. but the deliberate intention all along people say to me that britain is broken and it surely is. entire communities denied hope, denied hope for homes denied hopes of decent jobs. hopes of decent schools for their kids. denied hopes of better lives. condemned instead to an ever decreasing spiral of lost freedom. britain's traditional culture of hard work and hard workers has been replaced with a cul

main goals of the dim party, he fully supported them, but if they were here, if the members of the unipartye here and members of this firm, they would say, look, but this is consistent with our goals, there's something in there that we need, we have to settle for bad things to get what we need, there's something in there that helps defense, and republicans are always for defense, we need that too, the defense part of this... mind lump, i know - it's like bait, it's a way to lure republicans into the unipartisanship. can you repeat that again? i want everyone listening, if you've listened this far, this is the key point, write this down put it up on your refrigerator. the military-industrial complex is the bait that swallows all these progressive expenditures. in other words, they include various goodies for the pentagon. this... attracts everyone who is for the country's defense capability, and thus gets their votes to increase spending, and because of this we have this eternal two-trillion budget deficit, that 's why we have 35 trillion, but in the end it didn't become safer, the army didn

it's a way to lure republicans into the uniparty. can you repeat that again? listening, if you've listened this far, this is the key point. write this down, put it on the refrigerator. the military-industrial complex is the bait that swallows all this progressive spending. in other words, they put in all these goodies for the pentagon, these attract all those who are for the country's defense capability, and thus get their votes for increased spending, and because of this we have this eternal two-trillion budget deficit, that 's why we have 35 trillion, but in the end it hasn't become safer, the army hasn't become stronger, we can't even deal with the houthis, whoever they are, so in fact, as... this is usually the case, the effect is the exact opposite of what is stated, and no one notices it, does anyone really think that after all this funding our military has become stronger, no, it has become much, some people think it has become stronger in some ways, our weapons have become more advanced than they used to be, but on the other hand, our combat effectiven

than uh than biden has, the biden administration, essentially the the united states is run run by a uniparty consisting of two sides, the the the democrats and the republicans, and there's nobody who and and the elections are very strongly controlled, especially with regard to the issue of israel, by israel itself, israel has very powerful lobby in the united states and other countries, and that that lobby helps or... prevents people from getting elected, so and in the united states they have a counsel or an advisor or a... um someone who uh uh tags along for every single member of congress uh and meets with them weekly or several times a week and tells them what to do and what not to do, and if they don't do what the israel lobby says then they won't get elected in the next election cycle. on that note, i would like to thank both of our guests mr. robert fantino, author and journalist from krishna ontario and also mr. pauludi, as always, former us government advisor from berkerley, gentlemen, thank you, and thank you the viewers for listening and being with the news review program. take car

what kamala harris is running up against is this uniparty consensus in washington, d.c. this election. they want to make it look like she is cool and fun and intelligent. they have confines around what is acceptable. and that's why they hate donald trump so much. he pushes back against some of that economic wisdom that they perceive. kamala harris has pushed against it in another direction. and she is going to find out that these guys generally they don't want the structures in the oval office. they want to-to-support people who keep the american foreign policy basically on the same lines in europe and the middle east and people who have -- they can kick around the edges of the american capitalist idea they certainly can't go after wall street in the finance years and these sorts of wage and price controls are nod only bad for the economy but create enemies on wall street as well. >> ainsley: look at her nic agenda child tax increase increase, $6,000 for the first year of your child's life for middle income families. the price gouging ban which he auto we talked about. a

incompetent and frankly, treachery of what we call the uniparty because the labour are doing exactlyves have done for 14 years. let me draw your attention to a few figures here. so the amount spent on asylum in this country in total is actually significantly more . actually significantly more. that's just the asylum operations budget from the home office. it's closer to £43 billion per year that the united kingdom spends on asylum seekers. when this labour government told pensioners who were paid into the system in this country their entire lives, that many of them will now not get a winter fuel allowance, the proposed savings, the claimed savings of that for 1.4 billion per year. so we are constantly told that we don't have money for this. we don't have money for this. we don't have money for that. at a time when energy bills are at record highs this year for these pensioners who are being told they no longer get that winter fuel allowance, that was 1.4 billion in supposed savings. and yet we have got £4.4 billion a year to spend . £4.4 billion a year to spend. year after year. i'm

you belong to the uniparty. there's. you're not alone . other other people from alone.le from other countries. they're allowed a country in a nation state that britain belongs to. everyone and nobody. but yes. >> so these are they did get arrested like the people to their credit. >> absolutely. >> absolutely. >> these are , muslim guys, a guy >> these are, muslim guys, a guy called gaffer. who attacked, attacked these men. and i saw the footage. it was horrible. they, you know, they beat them. it was a mob of them. there was only two of the two of the white guys that they attacked. so, you know, it was a it was a nasty, cowardly, you know, mob attack. and they kicked and beat them. and they kicked and beat them. and it was horrible, you know, whipped up by, whipped up by some of the lies spread by by labour and spread by hope, not hate. so will they be receiving a knock on the door from the police? oh, i don't i think you're allowed to break the law and spread misinformation if you're on the same side as the labour party. >> is that the rule, jonathan? yes. i mean, you

people are voting for things like authenticity and they just hate the uniparty. >> yeah, well, thingsren't they? there's no denying it. >> well, it depends whether you think your left wing economically or socially. there's two different things. there's two different things. there aren't strategies i think are the ones who did. wallace and gromit as well. i just thought i'd throw that in. but, is that because we were talking about miliband earlier? yeah, it must be. he's got that look. he's good, isn't he? but it says my favourite thing in the whole article. its findings would appear to support the claims by mr farage that reform is a more credible opposition. if we defined the opposition as the preferred second choice of people who voted for the winning party, which seems like a really terrible way to define opposition. >> okay, well, look, that's the end of part two, but do join us in part three for academics in favour free speech, the un, not so much. carol vorderman's latest ramblings don't welcome back to headliners. it's your first look at saturday's newspapers. we're going to st

ralph, that this is inevitable, that this is something that is going to happen to us because the unipartyhat ought to happen. now, a lot of us feel utterly powerless to actually do anything about this. so i mean, given the german example, are you telling us that we're just in for one hell of a world of pain and the wants leading economy in the world is about to become an international pariah, thanks to the fact that it's just immiserated all the people in it. >> no, that is precisely what i'm telling you. and again, we have the numbers for this. if you look at solar power in the united kingdom, you guys are worse situated for solar power than the germans are. i mean, the idea that you want to use the idea that you want to use the sun as your main energy source in great britain, right? the dingy, rainy island of the off the coast of normandy is absurd, if you even talk about it. you guys are not saudi arabia. you guys are not in nonh arabia. you guys are not in north africa. we know the so—called capacity factor. i don't want to get too technical, but i think in this case it is it is appro

it's the culmination of the uniparty handing it is it's 50 days of chaos under keir starmer and rachelright. well another lively start to the hour. brilliant stuff . right. coming brilliant stuff. right. coming up, my stellar panel give us their nominations for greatest bristol union. >> jackass. excuse me. and we'll also be diving into jermaine jenas explosive interview with the sun. >> this is completely on me, i am 100% in the wrong, and i accept full responsibility for that. >> i'll bring you the rest of tomorrow's newspaper front pages at 10:30 pm. sharp. but next, in a new initiative that i think would make george orwell recoil in disbelief, some of britain's police forces are starting to utilise facial recognition technology in a way never before seen. big brother really is watching . is it seen. big brother really is watching. is it coming to a seen. big brother really is watching . is it coming to a town watching. is it coming to a town or village near you? stay tuned welcome back to patrick christys tonight. now in a little bit of a change to our schedule, i have some breakin