unit so if someone removes a illegal third non-conforming unit but the removal of an illegal unit is not conforming to the policy we have applied a hearing a discretionary review authorization florida their removing an illegal unit with the response to the mayor's office distinctive to try to preserve housing weight look at ways to legalize those units but in this case that doesn't trigger. >> can i ask again, if you remove a third an illegal unit where there are 3 legal units or 3 units. >> correct so if the building contains 3 unit then removal of an illegal unit. >> a fourth unit. >> if you want to remove one unit we'll require a mandatory hearing one of the reasons there's a break in the building code requirement if i have 3 or more unit there's a standard for safety requirements so somebody has a two unit building with a third illegal unit it's much anymore difficult to legalize the third or fourth or first for existing that's the break in there so it's a nuance so again, this would otherwise not require a mandatory hearing but given there's a b b n the appellant gets the notice

the gentleman's unit is a dwelling unit as defined in this section as defined a residential unit can be a legal conforming a legal unit or a legal non-conforming unit the law does not permitting provide a third definition the conversion to non-residential unit with non-legal status requires a building permit not a plumbing permit there's nothing that says its illegal and in the paragraph 6 of the regional occupancy two family dwellings there's no pending 90s notices on the non conforming status the september 2013 nova didn't mention it i'm going to be showing you a data sheet hopefully, you'll see that after two recent inspections on june 24th and july 9th any public comment? 2014 the inspections were inclusive as to the existence of a violation of the housing code with respect to the legitimate of the unit. after further use on july 21st entry the housing inspector said it shows an r-3 d 23 facility the legal description further indoctrinates defines two residential units on the ground floor. in fact the housing inspectors findings says the housing unit maybe a legal conforming unit

i'm sorry in the separate units versus the marked unit. the accessories record has an error. the correct count for bedroom count for the each of the exist single units is one bedroom per unit the proposed bedroom is two bedrooms so the project provides more bedrooms in each individual units. based on the staff review it's anothers departments recommendation that the commission take discretionary review and disapprove the property merger. the project will result in a net loss of one dwelling unit from the city's housing stock and replies them with a less affordable house and the r m-1 allows 3 zoning units and the proposed loss of the dwelling unit is contrary to the mayor inclusive including the naturally affordable unify u units and the housing affordability creates a exceptional circumstance such that existing dwelling units should be preserved that concludes my presentation. if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> thank you project sponsor. >> good evening. i'm aaron he miller owner jennifer johnson i have printouts o

in all of the city sponsored units. those are also in our inclusionary program our affordable housing programs all of our affordable housing cop and certificate holders get the first preference. what we do we give ellis act housing preference holders that come after the cop program or other cites specific preferences that will come after those and before the general population or the san francisco residents. we - the board of supervisors and the christmasing committee that put together the eligibility requirements recognizes that someone who moved into a unit their rents were high enough and probably able to make it in the market but people that have been in the unit for a longer are the ones targeted. so the program is that you have to have been in your unit for 10 years. we will also will allow you to be in the units years if you're disabled or have a doctor illnesses so it's for folks that a significa a significant impediment >> so this year we implemented the program in april of this year and went back to 2012 we we

for them different insurance terms applies to the unit itself so rental in those units is complicated in not enforceable i've called my insurance company telling me me i was trying to do it and they said no way. i was insured with hoa that is a large and reputable they don't have a model they spoke to the national industry and started to discuss it would be a way to consider it. i ask the supervisor to please further provide answers because we don't all of a sudden shift to one insurance company that might take on the burn in this particular setting. the other questioning question i raised it hotel rooms stipulate maximum occupancy the hotel rooms have existing diagrams and hotel rooms post costs per day, etc. if a unit is rented under similar terms as a hotel what particular part of the code could kick in when it comes to live safety and existing requirements and fire insurance, the presence even if carbon monoxide and smoke dethe courses within the room there's a discussion with dbi the fire department, the public health department to give minimal guidance to what's required in addi

do we have a united opposition? do we have a united war in syria?he fact is that the army in new and the security establishment of syria still are relatively united. compare syria with iraq. a problem today with iraq. the u.s. made the big mistake to dissolve iraqi security system at the beginning. for ten years the u.s. invested billions of dollars some to educate or to train or to organize a new army and security system. and you see that the army is weak today to confront its 1,000, 2,000 insurgents. this is the failure of the u.s. but i think the iranians are wise enough to support assad and his government to prevent the collapse of army and security establishment. no one knows what is going to happen after environmental issues. one, i think on weapons of mass destruction in the middle east, the only realistic major success has been dismantling have cyrian chemical weapons. we don't have anything else. and this is only and only because of trilateral cooperation between tehran washington and moscow. therefore, you can see if there is real cooperat

the united states or in europe.made the decision to travel to syria or that broader region, taken up arms alongside isil. they pose a threat because they have received military training, they're now battle hardened and they've displayed a willingness to risk their lives for their cause. they have western passports. that does give them some freedom of movement that could allow them to come back to the west and carry out acts of violence. that is why the united states, in conjunction with our partners, our other allied countries of othurs, have been monitoring the situation, tracking the movement of these individuals. interpol is involved in this effort. there are also countries in the region that have been supportive of the efforts of the united states and our allies to monitor the situation. the united states is always making adjustments to counterterrorism measures. you know, some of those measures are seen and some of those are unseen. we talk about this typically when it comes to aviation security. but it is true

either additional space within the unit or the unit themselves for a certain period of time. so anyone who any situation where there's not a resident in place would be violation of the ordinance. in the a step to address the problem about losing elementary rental units they'll be in violation. i have a few thoughts on the parts of proposal. i don't think anyone disagrees with the residents is 2 hundred and 75 days a year nobody has any arguments that's a reasonable thing. the register i think has to be with the city there has to be an assignment of the money and an address but this should remain confidential and lots of things we file with government like tax returns they know where we are and if we're in violation they know where to get us this could be the is that you and wanting to complaint about a particular property they'll look at the address and check the residents 0 and we don't have to have everyone's names. another issue not discussed today but mentioned in the legislation who may sue and who may not sue. cities are going down the wrong road. there are laws and the

it applies to projects with at least 5 affordable units so something p had 4 units that wouldn't apply let's say their inclusionary it wouldn't apply to the units and then that applies to 20 percent of the affordable units in a project for example, a one hundred, one hundred affordable projects only 20 of those units can be accessed but is e i p certificate holders. the preference is lids on a project by project basis to insure the consistent obligations and not apply if prohibited by state or federal funding sources or in violation of the applicable laws or enforceable obligations. the preference only applies to future projects would not apply to ocii accentuated housing projects with previous development approvals for example, a d b.a. loan, however, it would apply for example, to alice griffith phases one and two and that loan was approved by you in july but we have sxhertd language and the developer add that the commission chooses to adapt the ellis act preference we'll include the preferences at alice griffith. the e i p is applicable with the loan agreements and ground leases all

to a planning permit or either way the landlord has to have the unit empty the removal of that unit renders it unhabitualable. so i guess my final point is whichever procedure it determined the actual intent of my client is to remove that unit from housing use >> question why now. >> what triggered it. >> i pointed out this in my brief there have been several complaints made by lack of use in the building there are in that specific unit. my client was tried to he'd that and been unsuccessful and, in fact, the last notification from any folks were from pg&e when they established the unit at the request of the tenant and certified it didn't meet their standards. my client because of the configuration of the building being one legal residential unit above the commercial space simply to get even though heating that will satisfy pg&e and the planning code it is going to cost a minimum of $10,000 or more my client was determined given the recent series of events it is simply impractical to keep that unit as a residential unit that's why he's determined he wants to legalize that unit but a

at a special session of the united nations security council, the united states, cuba and russia offeredarges. >> to you, ambassador, the u.s.s.r. is facing medium and intermediate range missiles and sites in cuba? yes or no? don't wait for the translation. yes or no? >> i'm not in an american courtroom, sir. therefore, i do not wish to answer a question that's put to me in the fashion in which prosecutor does. in your due course, you will have your reply. >> i'm prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over if that's your decision. >> each side didn't know what the other side was doing and there was a lot of room for miscalculation. >> we believe there are about 25 soviet ships moving toward cuba. if the vessel does not stop, refuses to heed the instructions, force will be applied to assure that it does stop. >> nikita khrushchev said soviet ships will never submit to the united states blockade. >> the next few days are critical. who is going to blink first? [ female announcer ] hands were made for talking. feet...tiptoeing. better things than the pain, stiffness, and joint dam

china and the united states. building trust is elusive particular if one side doesn't understand what the other side thinks and why it does. that is the value of this book. and i can think of no better person to explain the iranian viewpoint to a western audience than seyed hossein mousavian who was at many events who did his und undergraduate here and has been doing research and teaching at princeton. i can recommend his book and it is for sale at the door. and i should tell you it is proved to be so poplar that we had to send out to the publisher to get more in. and he will linger a bit at the end to sign copies and chat with you. he was here two years ago to discuss his first book and i am delighted to have him back here potentially at this moment for our two countries. welcome and the floor is yours. [applause] >> thank you. first of all, i would like to extend my gratitute to warren and his colleagues at ipi -- gratitude -- for planning this event. i came to the united states in mid-1970s and left the u.s. s

the issue came up about sro and the inclusionary units in-law units do you have

or less including in-law unit unions a units without at large any units to long term tenants it is contiguous shared says that a unit can be providing for housing for family metabolizes who periodically leaf and rupture as circumstances change over time neighborhoods benefit by long term generation and it supports the long term stability for people to be intact and consistent with the cities general plan element. many of the units should be hosted and accepted for the rental days provided that the units are on the same property or occupied by the extended family or the long term tenant

units. it will include a 3500 square foot daycare center along with open space and the dare care will serve approximately 30 children living in the building as well as local families. the project will serve households up to 50% of median income as published by the mayor's office of community development. this means a family of four could earn up to $48,000 per year and pay 1093 for a two bedroom or 1201 for a three bedroom. consistent with other affordable housing projects certificate of preference will be given. staff anticipates including such a precedence here for this project. the marketing plan requirements will be included in the future gap funding loan and ground lease, both of which will be before you for commission approval. the project will be financed with tax exempt bond financing. the ocii subsidy will be consistent with the dda, which included a $200,000 maximum subsidy unit. and other ocii including developer payments from transbay jobs housing linkage fees. ocii will not be o

the issue came up about sro and the inclusionary units in-law units do you have an opinion on >> the issue of inclusionary units didn't come up but certainly it was important to get to the discussion and voerz are regulated under the audiominute code in section 41 and would not be covered through under this they're not allowed to had had roenldz and scott is shaking his head. >> that's par important that sro's are not included i have two views of the sro's people that go on vacation and want to rent out their place that's not a problem it didn't matter but i get the point that was raised about inclusionary units i don't know write staples necessarily. >> yeah. i mean just because in their inclusionary housing unit they shouldn't be able to rent their home and inclusionary units they own the unit. >> it's important that sro's are called out and that's classified then the hosted versus non-hosted and supervisor chiu's doesn't have a limit on the non hosted number but had limits on the non hosted and the staff is recommending limits on both be the same. i think there should be limitatio

also you can consider that there's an incentive also to for tenants to try to sub letting their units and take advantage of things. so this is my discern there could be public harm to future renters and to current tenants and landlords. thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker >> hi optimum david a you figure out generation san franciscan my kids work and live in the city and i have grandkids that has nothing to do with anything laura. i'm the former president of the twin peaks council and our neighborhood opposes this legislation there is no sharing it's taking no new wealthy unless your two of the following groups. rb and b stakeholders win and they've have the inconveniences of the neighborhoods coming and obligate with the strrlgz this is not the planning department how it's worked the zoning changes the planning department would host commercial districts and treason comments by other stakeholders then the department comes up with a proposal for on the area this has not been done if this is to be considered. this is not fair and not open and a pay out for a few it has usage conseq

and the concentration of units in 91 any particular units the number of units could explode that protective deserves further study and i'll refer it back to our staff for additional work thank you. and good evening. i'm affidavit thomason a long time landlord my mooiveng support home sthair and we support david choosing ordinance take all the tax money and build affordable housing right there. what troubles me is the planning department draft report an home sharing is cuts the heart out of the proposed ordinance while protesting support i'm going about the rentals to 90 days we have a tenant a family that can pay the rent for short-term rentals and 90 days a year is not enough. i suppose i could evict them isle ida make nor money but the city will lose would be more working class family there are many folks where housing is not affordable. i plead you with you help them to stay in san francisco does not document a 90 day rental. why not allow one unit to be used for short term rentals notice i said owner occupied tenant tend to be absent i'm appalled that all buildings are trying to convert

and god bless the united states of america. [applause] >> the former new york lieutenant governor was another speaker at the western conservative summit. she talked about the health care writtenething she has about in news articles and her most recent book. she is also the chair of the group aimed at reducing hospital deaths caused by infection. this is 20 minutes. [applause] >> i am so glad to be with you today. because we are in the fight of our lifetime. our access to our doctors and hospitals, our religious freedoms, our second amendment rights, and the rule of law, the very basis of our society, are all under attack. you will play a key role in allowing us to take back the united states senate this fall for the freedom of this country. [applause] and you will be decisive in selecting the next president of the united states. there are republicans in washington who say we ought to settle for fixing this health law within the framework of the health law. they are saying that because they have not read this health law. if they

if you go two doors down from my home there's a had unit

the deadly ebola virus is now in the united states. one of two americans infected with the virus in liberia arrived today in atlanta for treatment. the second will arrive in a few days. now, health officials say the deadly outbreak has already killed more than 700 people in africa. with me now, infectious disease specialist dr. bob arnott. you are known as dr. danger. you provide humanitarian relief in some of the poorest areas of the world. first handled experience with ebola. now, what everyone wants to know. is there a risk to americans in bringing these infected medical personnel to the united states? >> well, great question. this is a great team. the cdc, emory university, great ambulance service. so the risk is very low but it is not zero. remember, there was a south african man who was taken to south africa. he infected a nurse and the nurse died. the interesting thing is did they need to bring him here? he walked out of the ambulance. this was not a gravely ill individual. the fact is he could have been treated in africa. when

states and no sensible leader would want to conflict with the united states the united states with the leaders the united states have that more wealth and more at a huge bigger military than any country in the world no rational leader is just going to go out of their way and just cause a conflict with the u.s. that's not what's going on and it shows you know how you know we're in a period of economic crisis so the ability of wall street and bankers to make profits is limited you know they have their hoarded their hoard of gold with their ability to turn it into profits to invest it and make a profit is limited and there's economic crunch and so whatever profits can be made are much more competitive and it's much more desperate to control the markets they simply can't allow russia to to rise in the global markets especially when with natural gas there's there's hydraulic fracking has made you know natural gas in the united states much more abundant and it seems to be too much natural gas essentially the price of natural gas is going down the price of oil is also whatever or whatever or

do we have a united opposition? do we have a united war in syria?e fact is that the army in new and the security establishment of syria still are relatively united. compare syria with iraq. a problem today with iraq. the u.s. made the big mistake to dissolve iraqi security system at the beginning. for ten years the u.s. invested billions of dollars some to educate or to train or to organize a new army and security system. and you see that the army is weak today to confront its 1,000, 2,000 insurgents. this is the failure of the u.s. but i think the iranians are wise enough to support assad and his government to prevent the collapse of army and security establishment. no one knows what is going to happen after environmental issues. one, i think on weapons of mass destruction in the middle east, the only realistic major success has been dismantling have cyrian chemical weapons. we don't have anything else. and this is only and only because of trilateral cooperation between tehran washington and moscow. therefore, you can see if there is real cooperati

without the united states, the war would not have ended and we certainly turned the tide. >> united states was involved from the very beginning, whether it was economic, providing arms for the allies, whether it is volunteers going to europe to the red cross. you have americans following what is happening in the war. the immigrant communities have a clear connection in terms of their relatives and immediate family members. when the united states got involved formally in the war in the spring of 1917, it wasn't as if this was suddenly thrust upon the american people. their questions and issues that americans had been confronting and debating for quite some time. trying to mobilize the american population was a different story. that is where major wilson becomes important in how he framed the war as -- woodrow wilson becomes important in how he framed the war. he tapped into the democratic idealism of the united states and was quite effective in terms of mobilizing a country that was wholly unprepared for war. united states and one of the smallest standing armies in the world. the time the w

do we have a united opposition? do we have a united war in syria? the fact is that the army in new and the security establishment of syria still are relatively united. compare syria with iraq. a problem today with iraq. the u.s. made the big mistake to dissolve iraqi security system at the beginning. for ten years the u.s. invested billions of dollars some to educate or to train or to organize a new army and security system. and you see that the army is weak today to confront its 1,000, 2,000 insurgents. this is the failure of the u.s. but i think the iranians are wise enough to support assad and his government to prevent the collapse of army and security establishment. no one knows what is going to happen after environmental issues. one, i think on weapons of mass destruction in the middle east, the only realistic major success has been dismantling have cyrian chemical weapons. we don't have anything else. and this is only and only because of trilateral cooperation between tehran washington and moscow. therefore, you can see if there is real cooper

if not the united states. some of the rhetoric has occasionally talked about the united states. it is not central to what they are doing. there are a lot of ways this could turn into a longer engagement. they is been firm on no boots on the ground. no boots on ground. and there the question is in terms of whether this can work, can the kurdish forces hold together? one of the other reasons for action this week is there was a terrible crisis of morale and they were pulling back. and can they get their act together and it hasn't happened yet? gwen: i wonder if you put faces on the story whether this doesn't change public opinion or one of those things that foreign policy never works for you? >> there is really no cohesive strategy here. it is one thing to say the united states this is our role in the world and this is what we are going to do, i'm president i laid this out and here is my strategy going forward. that has never been put to the american public. it does look as scatter shot as it feels. the reason the president's approval rating is 36% in foreign affairs for people tha