the united states is put before a fact, but to try to draw the united states into where the united statesnot want to be drawn in, and you quite rightly noted the application for ukraine's entry into nato bypassing the stage, and partner of the hr membership action plan and, of course, today's is just an infernal statement zelensky that the west and the united states should launch a preventive nuclear strike on russia. that is, he calls for a global total nuclear war. well, in fact, the problem lies in the fact that such behavior was quite common in the history of international relations, but on the part of the satellites, when the satellites really tried, realizing their own interests, to drag their patrons into the war. ah, and force their patrons, but to realize the interests of the satellites. at the same time, they did not correspond to the interests of the patrons in during the cold war, there were a lot of such situations, and by the way, both moscow and washington then found the political will and wisdom to prevent such escalations and pull their satets in time. but here's another

this is because the united nations allowed the high handedness of the united states to antagonize us with the absurd reason. the united states is now planning even at this moment to conduct joint military exercises in the surroundings of the korean peninsula. obviously this is an extremely dangerous act which could drive us to the brink of war. we have found another answer to defend against the military threats of the united states and to ensure peace and security on the korean peninsula and in the region. at the recent session, low on the policy of the nation's nuclear forces has been adopted with the unanimous approval. -- the united states should clearly understand that their heinous and hostile policy over 30 years has just brought about the reality of the prolonged situation for the future. comrade kim jong-un said that present international situations show that the contradiction between justice and injustice with the power structure around the peninsula has become obvious with a change as advocated by the united states that is being accelerated significantly. the most fundament

i mean the united states of russia and , uh, the united states.ingly obvious and vital issue as for a conflict, as the prevention of a direct military clash, because we understand even the threat of escalation in different ways, because the dialogue between russia and the united states resembles a conversation of a deaf person in the last few weeks, when russia directly text says that the threat lies precisely in a direct military clash between russia and nato as a result. american arms supplies to ukraine, which are acquiring an increasingly large-scale and more and more sophisticated character. while the united states is talking about russia's alleged readiness to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, the absolute thing is what is called in english miss match yes, that is, really a conversation between the deaf and the blind. and even in this matter there is de-conflict. it is very difficult for us to agree with each other, but it is even more difficult for us to agree on content not on deconfluxing. therefore, how to properly regulate the uk

and again, logically speaking, one way to the united states, or maybe the only way to turn the united states from supporting your credit and to the level when that support can make a strategic difference for russia would be to strengthen departments. now how do you strengthen deterrence? you basically strengthen by saying that, you know, in certain circumstances, but we will not be hitting at ukraine will be hitting elsewhere. and that shared the so, but people of, so basically the idea was not to try to suggest russian needs to know hip united states where the nuke, the idea was to strength and to tons the foundation of peace as we know it. and it's interesting that most of the western decision makers, when they make statements about rush as possible, use of nuclear weapons, they need focus on tactical strikes upon ukraine. they never met, even conceive of russia being able to reach their own homelands. do you think that said deflection on their part, or do they honestly believe that given russia's potential and those people in the know they know of fresh as nuclear potential? they k

i often think in the united states, and particularly in the united states congress, there iy a confusionbetween operational and american strategy. we would be a lot more advanced, both the united states and as u.s. allies, in our dealings with the people's republic of china if 95% of the focus was on the clarity and consistency of our operational behavior and its consistency with the coherent strategy of deterrence asit opposed to what i would describe as this continued rhetorical to -- detraction to what we put into our strategy about e the chinese everyday of the week. furthermore, if the emphasis is on the clarity side residentt operational side then you create all sorts of opportunities to cause offense, cultural offense and the rest which frankly clouds out your ability to do with the extensive issues of the day. i have a deeply realistic view of how you deal with leninist. those of us who come from social democratic parties like i do by the way for 100 years since the second international in the 1880s we'll dealt with thee' problem of communist parties whether in europe or the unit

at the same time , discussions continue in full in the united states about how the united states wouldddenly went for the use of tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine and, in principle, in the united states , a consensus has already been formed in the american political and military-political establishment that that if this happens, the united states may strike at the response on russia on the russian armed forces and infrastructure with conventional weapons recently spoke about this, the former commander-in-chief of the us armed forces in europe, ben hodges. it's literally the same thing. a well-known american general, uh, former commander in iraq and afghanistan, former cia director david petrus, said the other day. listen we would respond by leading a collective nato effort that would destroy every conventional russian force that we can see and identify on the battlefield in ukraine as well as in the crimea and every ship in the black sea. well, if you think that hodge spitreus are such opinions of distraught generals, then i can disappoint you. unfortunately, those who usually call f

that are trying to drag their feuds into the united states.ially on the european continent, this is all already so discarded that it seems to me that few people in the administration in congress remember this story, but here is the story that we all remember, anatoly ivanovich, this is something that is directly related to your expertise and not only to your expertise as an ambassador, but for those uh of our viewers. who does not know your you have a rich and very important career. after all, you were the deputy minister of foreign affairs, and you were the deputy minister of defense, and you dealt a lot with issues of arms limitation and strategic stability. and that's when we look more specifically at the fact that the struggle for world order. for russian-american relations, especially strategic stability, especially the military dimension, what do you think is happening ? is it really all that has been accumulated as experience in international relations on some kind of partnership in this important area. this is what, now everything is d

the balance of power was held by the leaders of 3 nations, the united kingdom, the united states, and the ussr that die in one day before the dead man tried, krista peep office. not only because hitler was weak and knew healing weight, and he was bluffing. he was the major political figure, certainly one of the most prominent political leaders of the 20th century where they wish to report the germans of the germans. or when we support the russians in that way, let them destroy each other. there was that kind of sentiment in the west at this time. the redrawing of european borders had begun. britain and the united states, and then just any plan to attack the ussr, britain to survive. russia had to be sacrifice, is us. we should be like, and dish, divest, mr. boy from us as the lot of some ricardo capital mitchum, ours. hello, no. why not? the cold war had begun? or in 2022. the italian government approved a package of military aid to ukraine. coordination with and nita to help ukrainians defend themselves and fight back about 150000000 euros. well, i make a weep, almost even atomic bom

and so yeah the political landscape of the united of the united states the united states has a territory would have to look very different if things like removal didn't take place. one of the things that we often hear about today that i guess is is not necessarily about commemoration, but certainly one of the ways in which um mainstream american culture has brought. native culture if you want to call it that really symbolism into our the mainstream is through the use of symbols in sports, right? we see it in the names of universities in terms of professional athletes the cleveland indians have recently changed their name going into next season as the cleveland guardians right here in georgia, of course, our own atlanta braves came into a really bright spotlight a couple of weeks ago winning the world series, but once again the tomahawk shop came into if you if you can talk briefly. not only the use of how that started what it means for americans to do that. what about the tomahawk shot? one of the questions we got from the public coming into this discussion that you and i are having righ

oh, what is a unit? doctors monitored the dissections waiting for samples some needed a brain or heart. others deliver? mm hm. that's how to breathe. a deadly super virus capable of destroying a human body. in no time said shadow. you see a dish. it is a great joke. lynette, you can't see it. stout lot. k, wilson, you would assume there the candle cerebral here go is or not you're not, not, not, not the guy. i really surreal. he'll fornia soaring. the guy can do not. it still knows i knew. go on yoga chi worst ale. ah, it's hard to know how many were killed by unit 731 alone estimates very some say 3 to 5000 people. others put to figure out 10000 something. yeah. well then, yeah. now monday about a couple years old. i give them all nonlinear ah, most the army, general staff and emperor here a hutto will well aware of the units, goals and methodology. unit 731 was established in 1936 by the secret order of emperor. here he thought i saw the order with my own eyes when i served his hand of unit 73 ones gen

of the united states. but he was very inviting and charming and clipped. thomas, who talked about your mother, margaret. he said, i'm telling you what i told margaret. educate in education. it's important you get too much education. always a focus. education. in that conversation, i didn't know whether we were going to talk about. i didn't know what we were going to talk. i was just in awe of him. but was his focus in that? he knew the best investment we could make as a nation was in our children's education because that is how we ensure all can participate and, thrive in our democracy. and this promise is further today by the truman's scholarship initiative, which supports students interested in service. president truman's equipment to democracy did not cease at the water's. he knew that a threat to democracy anywhere was a threat. democracy everywhere. that's why he worked to rebuild europe into a bulwark against totalitarianism. that's why he extended america's helping hand, including with the berlin. that's why forged strong alliances with friends and

the united kingdom, the united states, and the u. s. s r dot b die in one day before the dead man tried christa peak up as not because hitler was weak and knew he would wait. and he was bluffing. he was the major political figure, certainly one of the most prominent political leaders of the 20th century when they wish to report the germans of the germans, or when we support the russians. and that way, let them destroy each other. there was that kind of sentiment in the west at this time. the redrawing of european borders had begun. britain and the united states, and then just any plan to attack the ussr, britain to survive. russia had to be sacrifice uses, which would be like and dish davis, mr. boyd from us as the law firm, ricardo this capital mitchell knowledge of knowing that the cold war had begun. so abortion was illegal in the united states until the case of roe vs wade. i had an abortion, i'm a mother today because i had an abortion in 2012 and that abortion saved my life. and we are here to fight for women, right? guy. the cons

the united states and russia.ere's a bulletin of atomic scientists has brought the doomsday clock to it than 100 seconds of midnight. it began at seven minutes to midnight. we are now at 100 seconds. the reason the bulletin of atomic scientists gives for this is the unilateral withdrawal by the united states from basically the entire architecture of arms control with russia in particular. so there has got to be pressure on the biden administration, not only to back off and allow zelenskyy and putin to talk, to allow them to have some kind of peace agreement that is filled with dignity for all sides, but also the united states needs to go back to the table with the russians and talk to them. if united states can talk to the saudis, why can't they talk to the russians? it is ridiculous to say the russians are not a good partner, they're not going to standby agreements. look who is talking. the united states is the country that unilaterally walked away from the iran nuclear deal. it was stop the iranians, it was the

china than it exports that has led to cold for the united states to decouple. in other words, this entangle itself from china, but it's not realistic. if the united states tried to decouple entirely from china, it would be very harmful to our economy. it would probably be harmful to our innovation. it would just have other economies industries step in where the united states stepped out so it wouldn't work. decoupling probably wouldn't be a very good idea for china either. china also knows that its larger economic faith lives with the rest of the world. and even though it has this tense relationship of the united states and others, it is you know, most of its economic growth that's been dependent on globalization with the rest of the world. it needs to find a way to balance those things. at the beginning of this video, we ask whether we're at the dawn of a new global economic age is the case of a us versus a chinese lead system. the differences are major. the market lead system of the u. s. favors a lack of government intervention that chinese system favors had

the 141 un states in the general assembly united to make russia pay. this is our unequivocal message to russia . about how to achieve parity to balance things. what if the americans reveal this ahead of time, really? i didn't know what a nuclear explosion was, the dog had to show his teeth. flame belongs to me woman to you heart parma watch to discover the world of educational programs and documentaries . we watch for free without registration two events of the week in the east of nato on nuclear containment. it would seem that some are building their course, others are solving military issues, and not one and the other do not come into contact with each other. but maybe it's tighter than it looks. we will try to understand this in the program of political economy. here we are talking about something important from two positions - from the economic point of view , alexander suvorova and the political about this, georgy podgorny so, with categories, exact numbers and data, they will help us figure it out. our speakers andrey korneev head of the school o

. unit 731 was a unique organization in the history of the world. what they were trying to do was to simply do nothing short than build the most powerful and most deadly biological weapons program that the world had ever. now. japan had a longstanding interest in biological weapons, emperor here a heater, who had a degree in the ring biology believed that biological weapons would help to pan conquer the world. as a descendant of the sun goddess. i'm at russell, he saw it as his calling in the 19 thirty's, the concept of japan's exceptional role in the world permeated the country society . oh so so june gets the sunni hummadi condie equal sucking yawn all natural medina o, japanese journalist, shoji condo, the author of evidence of unit 731 crimes. a book that caused quite a stir is one of the few people who tries to give an impartial account of factors that brought japan to wall tile to even look up to your schedule for a chunky to cook. got it, says so to so you wish. so than what they glint irish but they are so calling us get along for a gun not

uh, the united states and not think of themselves as from the united states, that is, they can not say that scholz is not just talking about the strategic autonomy of europe, but in combination with deepening integration in the european union, uh, in combination really because if countries give up the last instrument of their national sovereignty within the european union, namely , scholz is calling for this, then they will take a colossal step towards the united states of europe. yes, and this is important, because if they are really created, the united states of europe will not immediately be strategic and perspective, but transatlantic relations are a model of transatlantic relationships can change agree very briefly tokendra. yes, very briefly. i just wanted to say that europe cannot do this. and what schultz says is a big stupidity, of course, there were more smart predecessors. the fact is that as long as germany is, in your words, i want to say a colonial power or a semi-colonial one with limited sovereignty, and it is the engine of the european union, if the main thing is that

the meeting also heard the response by the delegations of ukraine and the united states. each delegation then made further statement and p fine points raised in the statements. additionally, the meeting had mass now, states meant from 42 states parties and one signatory state. there then followed an opportunity to respond for the russian federation. united states and ukraine. 3rd parties welcomed the fact that the delegations of the russian federation, ukraine, and united states had sought to clarify the positions with respect to the issue at hand. state parties noted by the constitution or us fully in conformity with the conclusions of the final document of the 3rd review conference relevant to the application of article 5 of the convention. the former qualitative meeting concluded with state parties adopting a report. i agree in that in quote, no consensus was reached regarding the outcome of the formal qualitative meeting on court. the adoption of the report marked the end of the former consultation process. mr. precedent. the provisions of article 6 have not been invo

in this area helps our units. from enemy aerial reconnaissance, as well as hide the positions and location of units approaching the front line of the defenders of donbass , the newest anti-tank systems kornet anti-tank systems of a new generation have received serious help at the disposal of the first army corps of the dpr, leaving no chance for enemy armored vehicles. here is a ukrainian infantry fighting vehicle moving along the road along the landing in the vicinity of the glidars, the drone transmits the coordinates of the targets and then fixes direct hit? anti-tank systems are a universal weapon, soldiers of the allied forces on the front line use them not only against enemy armored vehicles, with their help they destroy the strengthening of nationalists. the missile rushes to the target and after a few seconds successfully hits the target from the enemy. considering that in many sectors of the front in the donbass, the nationalists have been building a defense line for more than one year, the presence of su

and there was a stream of documents and data by unit 731 that went to 2 military bases in the united states to fort dugway in utah and to fort dietrich and maryland, which to this day remains the headquarters for the usaa biological weapons command. the will biologists doctor's medical students, adolescents who had nothing to do with medicine employed at unit 731 about 3600 people in total, including maintenance stuff, but only 12 men faced trial. and how about asked for still to new others. they can kunal sake of i e d divided by the he did ok this the signal came q in osaka, which side of june the whole the is dr through thumbing fan so no to me or to on i thought santo honda this well, can i know that so got in the kink, your data always cycle johnny. of course they, he mutational, ah, sure you, she visited fort detrick's usa main military lab, biological weapons, research and testing on humans continued in the 18 thirty's and forty's and fifty's . ah, the american military government and medical community experimented on the black population using syphilis and sexually transmitte

, why didn't the united states do that? guest: without getting into a bunch of stuff that we can talk about on tv, i think the united states has the capability abilities i will say that it gets much harder when these missiles are not sitting on a platform being filled over a. of two days but when they are mobile they can move them around and it's like a pop up lunch platform and if the missiles have solid fuel propellant in other words we don't have this kind were we can see them do this. this idea that they lunch we don't think it has the link. but still, it is very difficult in general. the decision to take out the missile is a very important one because i think you can only be made by the president of the united states. because of the brisket poses in terms of it escalating tensions and perhaps starting a war or a nuclear war. policy is that the u.s. tracked these things very closely. we could intercept it host: know it was going to be launched, new the trajectory, new where it would land? guest: so that is one of the pu

on lifestyle contamination. unit 516 inch. it's a come manufactured, chemical weapons and unit 731 near hobbin, developed biological weapons, and tested them on civilians. in pen fung village, they burned down around 300 local dwellings to clear space to build unit 731. the facility was self sufficient and inaccessible. that when the batteries a prison crematorium stadium, a shinto shrine, an airfield, a dedicated aircraft group, and a bow station. the facilities commanding officer was also the projects audiologist, colonel, cheryl, you see who the real you know to push it. but it's, i guess you shall go. awful komatsu is more than 90 years old and can't sit down for very long don't at that dinner a guilt when you suddenly would have to rush of korea annella's. i don't know, she will. death was now in a more real museum here who is one of the saddest museums in the world who says i owe sitting with a 3. can conquest hudson's. i to you, woman, i sure would have become toyota. he soon equal can control elegant with andy. sure .

which is to say the united, well, where we to make the presumption that the united states has had a hand in the sabotage. the course is going to be an investigation into this. it will be an investigation into which russia will not be invited. shades of an age 17 shenanigans in 2014. but i think the long term game here is for the united states, both to, to, to crush europe and to crush russia simultaneously that, that, that is the game. and at the same time, to make it impossible for europe and russia to collaborate, that will have the effect of consolidating rushes, pivot to asia. it will have the effect of greatly solidifying and strengthening the asian chinese lead asian alliances. it will have the effect of whether the united states wants it or not, of ushering, ushering in the multi per the world. so frightened, so terrified the washington leads that the saddest part of well, there are so many sad parts of the story and the suffering of the ukrainian all ukrainian people is one of those. but another very, very sad element. the story is the crashing of europe. yeah, and in, because of

it's funny but originally the french units in the polish unit x troopers were called the british unit. the person in a ends up being in charge of their commanding office jones who is a wonderful welsh man realized that these guys are in the most danger they are caught. they would be killed as jews and kill this germans and their families would probably be rounded up at the gestapo. they were officially called the british unit but what they will really be as german but all of them are told as part of this unit you take on a new persona. once they are selected they take five minutes to come up with a new name and is a back story about why they still have a german accent. the dog tags showed the regiment that they were currently attached to. they are all going to pretend to be the british unit of this commando but there are german speakers or a german jewish refugees. the story is so remarkable. it's not only that they end up being so crucial to the allies in the war but all of them have to transform through and through. >> the new persona element caught me, not so much that they would n

we've seen what happened to ran out. imagining that the united states is dangerous, and when the united states was using and this is public record, ukrainian territory to pump arms their to sunday and military advisors. what other means? we, as a nation, had to put an end to it. i can tell you what it means to not exist that should have been pursued and that is to say, and then make war on your credit. that should have been off the table. and then negotiations and diplomacy would be nothing. they weren't negotiations and diplomacy put in by the, in math, in 2001 in geneva. and they talked about that not pushing the situation further, but the american still continue doing that. army ukraine using its land for its own military purposes, even not making it a member of it without taking any defense obligations whatsoever. how could we have put an end to that? well, i can tell you that invading and then slaughtering people in ukraine is not a solution, nor does it reduce the chances of nuclear war. in fact, it increasing the chancellor nuclear war, which is what we began talking about. a nat

well , other developing countries are following the united states.l, european ones, which are also starting to raise interest rates. and in this connection already the un conference on trade and the third yung tat publishes an annual report in which they write that such actions cause very serious damage. first of all, on the developing countries of alexander mikhailovich, well, than neo-colonialism in its purest form to me, moreover, it follows from the president’s words that he clearly gave, uh, an indication that we both understand and see a real threat, not only in relation to us, but to the whole world. you look at what the americans are sacrificing today, they easily part with their allies. they actually destroyed europe and then, what was said on well in the speech of our president is not about colonism. we are actually watching. how is it in the example of germany what is happening today due to the fact that germany is involved in war games. uh, in ukraine, in fact today, uh, to the detriment of itself, it destroys markets, destroys its econom

and even for heating the unit itself, nevertheless. each new object will be individually created for special operating conditions and equipped, or vice versa, it is necessary will remove any excess. the most important thing, nevertheless, the designers say is that the unit itself does not change in size. and those blocks into which it is functionally divided were used for their intended purpose, if we say this is the block in which the ventilation system is located, then the ventilation system will always be located in it. yes, power can change. well, the whole structure will remain, the former function of the constructor is to correctly build this unit; development by blocks; to provide for what will happen in the future, that is, with further development the blocks did not change in order for the unit to retain its, let's say, architecture. previously, the technological process was many times more complicated, each supplier of the units made his own design, and on the site it was necessary to verify what, how and where to place it. n

of the mentioned enemy unit, the reluctance of the russians to fight confirms these data, ukrainianreceived more than a thousand requests for surrender in the last few weeks, according to the representative of military intelligence andrii yusov on the air of the freedom tv channel, the surge of requests began after a successful counteroffensive of the armed forces of ukraine in the kharkiv region and the announcement of mobilization in russia, i will remind you that a state project is working in ukraine live who helps the russian military to surrender safely, then they started calling not just soldiers who are on the territory of ukraine as part of the occupation army, and those who either just assembled or just mobilized, are they still in the territory of russia, are their relatives or even people who suspect that they might be mobilized just in case clarifies the information nato goalkeeper ian stoltonberg has officially received ukraine's application to join the alliance about this informed the deputy head of the president's office, ihor zhovkva, now they say in the office that

now, at this point, what can the united states do? but rant and rave at the saudis for not doing what they want here. some of what we've heard, what saudi arabia did to help prudent continue to wage his despicable, vicious war against ukraine will long be remembered by americans. we are looking at all the legislative tools to best deal with this appalling and deeply cynical action, though the no peck bill is up for discussion. this is a bill that would allow the united states to sue opec countries take them to court, possibly have you as court, seize their assets, if they don't do what the united states wants, that would allow civil actions against opec countries by the united states in retaliation for move such as this, that bill is up for discussion. in addition to that, the military relationship between the united states and saudi arabia is being questioned. this is what's been said as well. i just don't see any good reason for us to maintain troops that are there almost solely for the purpose of protecting their oil fields and the

the whereabouts of the unit 731 leaders are unknown to us. there are no grounds for charging the unit with wall crimes. cold war. and there was a stream of documents and data by unit 7, free one that went to 2 military bases in the united states to fort dugway in utah and to fort dietrich and maryland, which to this day remains the headquarters for the usaa biological weapons command. there will biologists, doctor's medical students, adolescents who had nothing to do with medicine employed at unit 731 about 3600 people in total, including maintenance stuff, but only 12 men faced trial and about asking for still to new others. they can kunal sake of i e e divided by the t did ok this the signal came q in osaka, which side of june the whole the if dr. through them in the fan phone. oatmeal towana santo, honda, this, well, can i live there? so regarding the kink your data always cycle, johnny, of course they, he meets digital. ah, sure you. she visited fort detrick's usa main military lab, biological weapons, research and testing on humans conti

i don't see the united states doing this. this is, this is trickery that even the united states realizes, will lead to nothing more than an escalation of a conflict, both united states and they don't make clear. they don't want escalate. yeah, now given the weapons and supplies that the u. s. has already been giving to yeah, i mean, ukrainian troops have showed residential areas and crucial civil and infrastructure allegedly using those us applied high mars missiles. so what is your take on that, and is the us showing at all here that it's concerned about that civilian infrastructure, or is it more so just showing that it isn't quite ready to escalate that conflict directly with russia? well, i think it's, it's, look, the u. s. is clear that they don't want to escalate to. they don't want to turn this into a direct conflict between nato and russia. on the other hand, the united states has shown an absolute disregard for the strikes that ukraine has been doing a regular and ongoing basis against civilian targets, purely civili

now the united states has pledged this aid package 200 armored cars of american armored cars brother also ammunition for mortars for small arms and many other things, let me remind you that since the beginning of the full-scale invasion and the united states has already provided ukraine with military aid for almost 17 billion dollars . that this is a program of presidential powers that allows the us to allocate weapons for ukraine from its own arsenals from its own stocks, therefore, in essence, it must be shipped and sent to ukraine, therefore, we can expect that all these weapons will end up on on the battlefield, yulia will soon be on the battlefield. on sunday, us defense minister lloyd ostapa called the return of the estuary under the control of ukraine an absolutely important development in the course of the war. how do the pentagon evaluate the latest achievements of the ukrainian military in general and do they talk about a turning point in the course of the war? the fact that russia is now losing on the battlefield, and despite the fact that russia has announced mobilization

that is a steadfast longtime partner of the united states. but now we're seeing the circles of power in washington, turning on them pretty rapidly in response to recent moves around opec people will recall the words of former us president george w bush, who said you're either with us or against us. and that kind of thinking seems to be prevailing in washington dc. why can't the by get american oil companies to increase the output? they just won't do it. because american oil companies are doing is raising prices at home to make up for this slowing of demand. well, it's the same thing that the saudis and opec are doing globally, or, you know, negotiate to go on right now between us, well, companies and biden, about exporting oil from the u. s. to europe. so, you know, that's going to cause more of a supply problem, the u. s. and raise prices, even more. prices are going up fast. the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down to refineries. no, they're not having these a regular maintenance. and then there's the so called fires

of course, the united states is one of them. it is a another instance in which would be helpful to have crimes against humanity an american law books at long last. >> the chairman eluded, i will just conclude because i see my colleague, senator graham, has arrived. the chairman alluded to the question that he has been asked, i have been as well, whether the law could ever reach vladimir putin? my answer is, yes. at the very least, in my view, he could be tried and convicted in absence yeah. he is not going to be in that position forever. maybe for less time than he expects. if he refuses to submit to the jurisdiction of a valid court, the international court of criminal justice, couldn't he be tried and convicted in absense e. >> again i cannot speculate on individual cases. that is not consistent with justice department policy i will say that the post cold war era has seen a number of heads of state brought before courts for, to be brought to justice in the wake of it across the crimes. >> i'm glad you said that, i think there

the united states is gonna have to take the capital.cott is now gonna be in charge of that invasion for central mexico. he takes a lot of his invasion force from taylor, which makes taylor thinks that scott wants to run for president. taylor doesn't have enough troops to do anything now. they hate each other as much as they hate poke. are you with me so far? this might not be an overseas war, but it does prove the lie in that myth that politics stops at the water's edge and more time it never has. i don't know that it ever will. it certainly didn't in the mexican american war. so, scott is supposed to invade central mexico and march overland to mexico city, he needs the troops. he takes them from taylor. taylor is very unhappy about this, but here is what happens. one result, one result of the fall -- mexican frontier, is that he is overthrown, the mexican president overthrown in another coup. he is replaced by santa ana. santa ana chooses another president, only to take back the presidency from him a little while later. in the meantime

and the united states. and they also seemed as smaller countries very manageable as countries that could be brought into the european union. and nato. they made a lot of the internal reform is legal and economic reforms that were necessary to join these two western institutions of the european union and nato. they were sort of objects of desire joining this western clubs. and at a certain point they entered into the -- institutions. that gave these three countries a great feeling of connectedness and security. not least because when you enter nato, as i'm sure all of you now. when you enter nato, you get what is called the article five commitments. that the united states or any other nato member will come to the defense if there is a threat to, -- if there is a threat to the security of one of these countries. so the paths of these three -- latvia, lithuania, estonia. it was a path to the west. if you can put it that way. it was a path into these western institutions. unambiguous populations were in favor o