the question about a united europe must be given a categorical yes.rights. at the end of the reconciliation mass chas lor cohance lor cole said let us turn towards a great future for both our nations, polish and german nation and for all of us in europe. may those words remain in our memories. thank you. [ applause ] ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> translator: i call upon philip gonzalez of spain kindly to say a few parting words. >> translator: thank you. thank you to the presidents of the european parliament and commission and council for granting me together with helmut kohl to say good-bye personally to my friend helmut kohl. it's hard for me. i'm glad it's only five minutes. i'm saying good-bye to helmut kohl from the angle of a friendship which made great sense. we brought confidence together with friendship. that's quite rare in politics. and it was accompanied by loyalty. he was extremely sensitive to any lack of loyalty. he had a sense of history. that's why he talked about a european germany so there would never be any repetition of a german euro

there was a strong affirmation of the united europe, article 5. everything appropriate for american policy toward europe was expressed. david: and explanation of europeans that america first doesn't necessarily mean we abandon our allies. we stand by our allies. america first means simply we are not going to be dictated to by bureaucrats 3000 miles away. >> it is not a united europe. this speech reaffirmed the importance of europe, a europe that is entire and free in this speech. he is not against europe. what he is against is over bureaucrats eyes to -- david: we thank you very much for coming in. former governor of virginia jim gilmore. the president is getting ready to leave the g 20 summit in germany. some comments before he leaves happen in the next hour. a lot to come, we will be right back. number smart bed. the only bed smart enough to change sleep as we know it. it senses your every move and automatically adjusts on both sides to keep you comfortable. and snoring.... does your bed do that? right now save on sleep number 360™ smart beds. pl

we have a united europe because he found partners in this great enterprise. a ryan's -- political giants, and in a slightly different dimension, pope john paul ii. today the successors to those great heroes of europe's positive story must, as they bow over his coffin, examine their in berlin ands warsaw, in paris and budapest. the question about the future of a united europe must be given a categorical yes, yes to the union, yes to freedom, yes to human rights. at the end of the reconciliation said, letcellor kohl us turn from the altar towards a great future, peaceful and blessed by god, for both our nations, the polish nation and the german nation, and for all of us in europe. many those words remain in our memories. thank you. [speaking in german] former primen the kindly tof spain to say a few parting words. >> thank you. you to the president's of the european parliament's, -- presidents of the european parliaments for giving me the to say goodbye personally to my friend helmut kohl. it is hard for me. i am glad it is only five minutes. i am saying goodbye

butted it and rightly for many reasons, he never was able to complete the necessary steps to really unite europend make it a political and ecoconoc entity and that came about in 2008 when the financial crisis broke and that had very much to do with the deficiencies of europe and it was not her fault and also, she certainly is the strong leader in this europe. no doubt about it. germany is as big as it is but her strength is the weakness of many european leaders. ?> what has that led to a continuing crisis in southern , a divisionit between western and eastern europe, especially hungry and poland. -- hungary and poland. she squandered everything helmut kohl stood for. >> we can debate about what happened in great britain, whether this is her fault or david cameron who started an unnecessary referendum. [laughter] >> i would absolutely agree. i think it has nothing to do with angela merkel. >> it is the british fault, not the germans who made the referendum happen. >> we are going to move from the european panorama back to the local level in the last couple days. there has been an unholy feud over

guy: he talked about a united europe. let's bring you into this conversation. will angela merkel position the u.s. has led these sort of events and has donated the global stage. china and germany seem more aligned when it comes to the issue of globalization and issues such as the environment. keep everybody happy or is that the objective here? remember have got to that all these leaders are in germany, arriving in germany now, we're also going to have the president of south korea in, they are all going to be arriving over the next 36 hours for the g-20. thisny is the hub of all diplomacy. what does merkel want? andoon as trump was elected said he has been inaugurated, the germans and chinese have been meeting more often, there has been high level talks on the german side involving merkel. there has been this outreach. germany, the chinese are a partner certainly on open trade, that makes sense if you look at the data. these are the world's number one, that is china, and number three merchandise exporters and , a fairly, which was easy thing to agree on after do

france and germany look very united and strong. europehave new strength and energy and enthusiasm and we have been left behind. we are the ones who are great if you like outsiders, we will be the flyover zone as people go to talk to germany in paris. what eunice goes says about the streets, it seems far—away, but it is important and it is what links people who are so one alike, that is macron and trump. we we re alike, that is macron and trump. we were both elected by amazing disaffection and anger at the grassroots level. if they don't succeed, where will that anger go? this worries a lot of people because it is notjust france in the us, it is all countries as well. this pent—up angeragainst is all countries as well. this pent—up anger against the establishment, anybody who is on top, is relieved dangerous. does that affect the leaders we get? there is this reaction, they have been elected because of the surge of disaffection, is there a danger that compromises the leadership because leaders are terrified of getting a similar response of

france and germany look very united and strong. europeength, energy and enthusiasm, we have been left behind. we are the ones who are going to feel like outsiders. a flyover zone will be very important as well. it will be going to germany and paris. a flyover zone will be very important as well. what you say about the streets, it seems far away but it is so important. it is what links to people who are so alike, emmanuel macron and donald trump. they were both elected by amazing disaffection and anger at the grassroots level. if they don't succeed, where is that anger going to go? this is something that really worries a lot of people. this is notjust friends and the us, it is other countries as well. this pent—up anger against the establishment, against anybody who is on top, is really dangerous. does that affect the leaders we get? if there is this reaction and they've been elected because of the third of disaffection, is there a danger that compromises leadership because they are terrified of getting a similar response, similar anger an

but france and germany look very united, very strong. europe to have new strength and energy and enthusiasm, and we have been left behind. we are the ones who are going to feel like the outsiders, unimportant. we will be the flyover zone for anybody else. nobody will come and talk to us, they will be going to germany and paris. i think what eunice says about the streets, it seems far away, but it is so important, and it is what links two people who are so unalike, which is emmanuel macron and donald trump. they were both elected by amazing disaffection and anger at the grassroots level. if they don't succeed, where is that anger going to go? this is something that worries a lot of people, because this is notjust france and the us, it is other countries as well. this pent—up anger against the establishment, against anybody who is on top, is willie dangerous. but does that affect the kind of leaders we get? if there is this kind of reaction and they have been elected because of this surge of disaffection, is there a danger that compromises the is

reputation with our allies in europe in particular as a result of this administration's failure to acknowledge that russia hacked and attempted to manipulate the president of the united states? if you believe there has been an impact in terms of our standing with their allies in europe, do you believe that it is going to have an impact on our ability to protect ourselves on guard against what should be a predictable attack in our 2018 election by russia? >> i think the basic problem is the europeans are custom to looking toward the united states to lead on any big issue. this is a big issue. the hearing is central because all of us are under attack. they don't see the united states leading. if you combine, this is in response to senator cotton's question, president trump has not been strong on the sanctions against ukraine. he's not been an advocate for the independents advocate of ukraine and he's been very ambivalence, even hostile to nato. he seems to look at germany as a strategic economic competitor, not as an ally. you put that together and i think it's the first time since 1945 that europeans might likely see merkel as leader of the west, not president trump.

and has has helped unite europe and invigorated leadership in paris.e is kind of back and angela merkel is strong and established and in some ways the most stable leader in the world, actually. the two of them together has made europe more with a spring in its step, a bit more confident. part of brexit was let's leave this structure of europe there in decline and look at the economic numbers and it's britain that is lagging behind and europe that looks like it has some new confidence. >> so, david, you wrote this wonderful book about people, the somewheres and the anywheres, populism and brexit. does trump follow the same pattern? is he a break from it? >> yes, i think my book essentially about the value divisions in rich democracies and the large number of quarter of populations and perhaps almost a third who tend to be highly educated and mobile and value openness and autonomy. >> they can live anywhere. >> they tend not to be very -- they tend to not have very strong group attachments. tend to value security and familiarity and they still do have st

united kingdom. we have to invent another name because europe without the united kingdom is not europe.the european team on a number of levels, and that meant that the other eu countries were willing to do some special deals for the uk to keep it sweet. we didn't have to join the euro currency, for example, and we got a rebate on our contributions to the eu budget. but, that was when we were inside the club. now we're on our way out, and the eu says it has other priorities. i know the uk very well, i've been working with a lot of british ministers in the last 20 years — they are very fine negotiators, but they have the characteristics to negotiate in their own interest. we are going to negotiate for our own interest too. the european commission is negotiating brexit on behalf of all the eu's 27 countries. nobody wants to punish the uk for its choice, the british people for their choice, but one thing is clear — the show must go on. the european show will go on. even if there'll be some changes in the props department. i've been told all the flags of eu are in this room. let's have a loo

a decision i should add that was protested widely in the united state in europe. protest them are in no small part by the kgb. for the next four years, the two sides jockey at the negotiating table until it finally reached an agreement. today, vladimir putin and russian strategic thinkers remain ambivalent. after all, we don't worry about missile threats from canada or mexico in the deployment of intermediate-range missiles to cuba would plainly bridge the understanding reach after the cuban missile crisis that the united states will not accept west end stationed on the island. .. countries on the eurasian perimeter and here i speak in particular china, have complete freedom todeploy intermediate range missiles . moreover, the lack of these missiles in russia's arsenal decries russia as a potent tool to gain leverage in its near bride as it always seeks to do. vladimir putin has resolved this ambivalence in a single way: cheating on the inf treaty.by state department accounts, rush has been testing a new cruise missile that can strike western europe and at least n

will come back under different leadership, but for now, that is the feeling, and that has helped unite europe, the other thing it's done is invigorated leadership in paris, emmanuel macron has suggested their decline is back. angela merkel is established as the most stable leader in the world, actually, the two of them have made europe walk with a spring in its step, and again, there's a reading from london, which is brexit. let's leave this structure of europe in decline, you look at the economic numbers and it's britain who's lagging behind. and it's europe that has new confidence. >> you wrote this wonderful book about people, the somewheres, the anywheres, does trump follow the same pattern? is he a break from it? >> yes, i think the -- my book is essentially about the value divisions of enriched democracies and the large number of populations, perhaps almost a third who tend to be highly educated and mobile, and value openness and autonomy. >> you called it anyway, because they can move anyway? >> they tend not to be very rude, they tend not to have strong group attachments. we have half

what this would mean is the intended effect would be that europe would stop depending on russia for natural gas instead by natural gas from the united states so the upshot is that one it would be very damaging to russia's economy but it would also be very coercive on europe and ilu is reacting very upset angrily towards these sanctions because in the end it's also aimed at them. exactly i wanted to actually quote what the you commission president john quad juncker said this morning regarding sanctions while quote the e.u. is fully committed to the russia saying sions regime the us bill could have unintended unilateral effects they impact the e.u. energy security interest this is dan if american allies are not even in fully support her fully support this the latest action i don't see is sustainable and frankly i see it is dangerous i mean why the u.s. is going out of its way to make enemies out of friends and. including russia frankly i would count on that list is just amazing to me and i would counter iran of that list you know if i can mention iran you know i was just there a few weeks ago and you know even donald trump admitted de

europe. it's almost like an invitation for people to do it. there is a growing realization of that. they bring that attitude to the united states. this 25% of the market share in europe it is twice as big as the nearest competitor. there's been a lot of testing showing the discrepancy between the highway emissions of diesel into the lab emission is enormous. people are realizing that and that's why the diesel market share is going down. >> i'm just wondering in the research if you came across anyone from volkswagen who knew that it had been done in the past and that it was possible or was it that insular? it's what the people in the united states were telling them about in the u.s. market and they don't seem to have taken that threat seriously. what is the political blowback going to be, there are green parties in most european countries and they are moderately successful i assume that this is making the day for them. >> if you look at what the actual areas are they are higher than they should be if the car companies were adhering to the standards there were about taxes on gasoline versus diesel. is that making any progress? >> i

principle refusing sanctions that the fact throw parties or other states it's important that the united states and europe coordinate closely and their sanctions bill is it'll what's russia. it's not just the germans though the french foreign ministry issued a statement saying that well they believe that the sanctions impacted upon the rights of private individuals as well as corporate entities to an extent that they believe may go beyond international law but just who supported the sanctions in the united states in the house of representatives four hundred nineteen to three they went through the vote there but when we look particularly at the energy sector we have to look it who supported the sanctions in the house of representatives remember four hundred and nineteen to three this sailed through in the vote on it but those that voted for sanctions are also among those who want us gas on the e.u. market something sanctions would make much easier we must continue to focus on how we get our gas here in the united states our natural gas to europe to our allies so they're not so dependent on russia so what o

people who not do like the united states, europe would like us to be an obedient member of the un whotens to whatever the un and. eu says, but that is not leadership. we know a weak united states is very dangerous for global stability. >>> you mentioned president obama. someone said president obama is no different than a trump, a clinton or a bush, that it's the military complex that runs it all things that happen in the united states and around the world. so while you may try to separate president obama and place blame at his feet. they feel that it's all the same. america will take care of its interests, it's not about making permanent friends, but it's the interests that matters most. you brought up the, that someone pushing our agenda which we think we know best, sometimes people die, there's casualties, and people die, and that is what happens in war. unless you are able to be like gangster and intimidate and you say we are going to do that and we will kill your family these people will never respect you, because that is what tough leadership is about? >> when mr. obama came to o

europe in 1983. it's a decision that was protested widely in the united states and europe, protests that were funded in no small part by the kgb. for the next four years, the two sides jockeyed at the negotiating table until they finally reached an agreement. today, vladimir putin and russian strategic thinkers remain ambivalent about the treaty, in my opinion. on the one hand, russia benefits more from the inf treaty than does the united states. after all, we don't worry about missile threats from canada or mexico. and the deployment of intermediate range missiles to cuba would plainly breach the understanding reached after the cuban missile crisis that the united states will not accept offensive weapons stationed on that island. russia, by contrast, is a vast land power of eurasia with potential rivals in close proximity. by eliminating these missiles from europe, russia gained security in the most likely theater of a general war from the superpower most capable of striking in its territory, the united states. on the other hand, the inf treaty only applies to the united states and russia so countr

i think europe after the first sanctions we've seen that they came out of the loser comparative to the united states. second time around i don't think they want to be in that position russia although unpleasantly affected has made the most of it as we've seen a number of other areas that has forced development i mean if we look at the relationship between the u.s. and russia. how are these measures going to affect it if it indeed goes ahead if it's signed and. you know these restrictions all going to help much as all that we've seen an awful lot of like a private eye. since seventy six that i've been dealing with the soviet union and russia i've never seen relations with such a low. it's an almost it's in no way exact situation very very sad. it is now if we look at the concerns of europe because this is quite unique particular it's we've seen such nina negative rhetoric anti russian rhetoric for more lova but the situation as it stuns a lot of european countries have said they are really no happy about this in particular we've got germany austria and france can you explain why they've spoken

well i was i would number one to say why is it that russia's reputation in western europe in the united states is what it is right it's not just grew on a tree it's a response to russian aggression it's a very low numbers terry no question we have no ok because the evidence is there that russia has interfered in the election if they have it it is russia our intelligence agencies. complete confidence high confidence put out the findings that this happened in our intelligence agencies say that that didn't happen why do you think russians should take the chessman if american intelligence agencies so over there so you're telling me that you don't think that russia interfered in the u.s. elections to look another going to accept the argument from authority that's what i'm saying i think you guys are all overcome by the argument if i thought i said i we're just asking for evidence and indeed if there is because i mean the american intelligence agencies produced this report they bought our t. is being in a major source of influence and i encourage you to go and watch the interview that we will

reputation with our allies in europe in particular as a result of this administration's failure to acknowledge that russia attempted to manipulate the election of the president of the united states. and if believe there has been an impact, in terms of our standing with our allies in europe, do you believe that is going to have an impact on our ability to protect ourselves and guard against what should be a predictable attack in our 2018 elections by russia? ambassador burns: the basic problem is that the europeans are accustomed to looking for the united states to lead on a big issue. this is a big issue. all of us are under attack from a systematic russian campaign but don't see the united states , leading. if you combine -- this is in response to senator cotton's president trump has not been strong on the sanctions in ukraine. he has not spoken out on interference and been very natoalent, even hostile to and seems to look at germany as , a competitor and not an ally. if you put it all together, the first time since 1945 that europeans might see angela merkel as leader of the world, -- leader of the west, not president trump. i don't say it lightly. i think it is a sad s

europe which finances terrorism and we've got to add. this year with principal leadership and i think president putin trump prime minister nouri neurons or more the other leaders from the united kingdom have europe have an opportunity to address these issues and just on north korea joe. didn't give too many details on that other than to say you know both foreign offices. between russia and america will continue to work together on this not so much detail there compared to what he said about other topics to you can you read anything into that. well i think the trump administration made it very clear that they were disappointed with china not being able to rein in the dictator of north korea in fact as we all know china is the lifeline to north korea and i think countries in asia have a responsibility to address this issue alongside the united states and russia and i think this is a serious issue when you have a dictator recklessly testing ballistic missiles and threatening to cause great harm and chaos so i think it is a responsibility of countries in asia including china and india and i think india ought to play a more decisive role in this issue as well alongside the united

so far, these efforts have not been successful in europe as perhaps they were in the united states. for instance in france, and the campaign the french government was prepared to push back on cyber leaks as they released information in the 48 hour blackout time. we've seen companies such as facebook take down a series of fake accounts to help those efforts. in the netherlands earlier this spring officials hand-counted paper ballots to ensure there'd be no electronic interference. across europe government media push back against fake news stories and have established such institutions in the nato strategic communication center of excellence to educate the public and identifying and correcting russian propaganda. frankly we have learned a thing or two from our allies in europe about proactively protecting ourselves against these threats posed by russia. a month ago i would have assumed this hearing would've been a good opportunity for the united states to import some lessons learned tory european friends. unfortunately, today we have not yet as a government hole taken to heart those l

this has hit europe and the united states in the last month. since 2014, we have identified 51 attacks in europe and north america. the vast majority of the perpetrators were citizens of the country in which they committed the attack. only 5% of those who carried out the attacks were refugees or asylum seekers. most had a prior criminal past. less than 10% were directly ordered by isis to commit the attacks. in most cases the attackers are isis inspired or had some touch point but no explicit direction. about 20% of the attackers were returning foreign fighters. those that did commit those attacks were more lethal in their attacks. the majority of the perpetrators who pledge allegiance to isis before their attack and after their attack. isis took credit for about 40% of them. france has experienced the highest number of attacks at 17, followed closely by the united states with 16 attacks. attacks in the u.s. tend to be significantly more unstructured. spontaneous than europe. even though some of them, orlando, and san bernardino, being a good ex

what is europe doing right that would make sense to do here in the united states? ms. holmer? or anyone else. >> sure. europe is spending a lot more resources and time on the prevention agenda. they have a lot more programs that are about divergent and are about interventions before people at early stages of radicalization. this is something that the eu has invested heavily in. something that happens on the municipal and national government level in terms of funding and support and they have a lot more programs than we >> and yet they have the bigger problem. >> if i could just add, not to pat ourselves on the back too much or to get too critical of europe, their networks exist all the way back to the conflict in bosnia. so these networks of recruitment and radicalization have been around a lot longer than we have had in the united states. >> so let me get this straight, nato, predominantly christian or christian heritage organization, went to war with a christian country, serbia, to defend the people of bosnia, and of kosovo, two of the three muslim-majority states in europe t

europe in 1983. a decision i should add that was protested widely in the united states and europe. protests that were funded in no small part by the kgb. for the next four years the two sides jockeyed at the negotiating table until they finally reached an agreement. today, vladimir putin and russian strategic thinkers remain ambivalent about the imf treaty, in my opinion. on the one hand, russia benefits more from the imf treaty than does the united states. after all, we don't worry about missile threats from canada or mexico. and a deployment of intermediate range missiles to cuba would plainly breach the understanding reached after the cuban missile crisis that the united states will not accept offensive weapons stationed on that island. russia by contrast is the vast land power of you'eurasia. by eliminating the missiles from europe, russia gains security in the most likely theater of a general war from the superpower most capable of striking its territory. the united states. on the other hand, the imf treaty applies only to the united states and russia. so countries on the yur

united states went to great efforts to try to convince european leaders european governments not to join the asian infrastructure investment bank but all of them did they did not listen to the u.s. europe has a very different attitude towards russia a very different attitude towards china a very different attitude towards iran than the united states does clearly europe is very pro engagement right in ways that america is not personally i take the european. what do you make of africa itself and its stance i know it's also broad word because you know you want to talk specifically on that country but let's try to take it as you like it's going to take iran. to see how china reacts and some of the european countries react in terms of in africa are just going to stay there and let it be exploited i'm happy to talk about africa i'm a geographer anyway so to me there is a meaning to africa but economically and politically it's very fragmented you can generalize somewhat about west africa east africa and sub-saharan africa and arab sort of north africa but what you're describing is this phenomenon that i call multi alignment multi alignment is what happens when it's a multi-polar world when eu

discuss issues of security and pertaining to the development of the transatlantic on between europe and the united states. we will also talk about the development of infrastructure and our part of europe, central will discuss also the development of the european union because all of the three seas members are involved. when we talk about the cohesion policy, we are looking at this from the european union perspective. we want to implemented through the development of infrastructure to increase competitiveness of our countries and increase the competitiveness of the entire european union. i hope we will be able to do that in cooperation with the united states according to the win-win principle that this will be beneficial for the united states and poland. once again, welcome. i am hugely delighted with your visit to poland. thank you very much on behalf of the entire polish people and thank you mr. president. the unitednt of states come mr. donald trump, the floor is yours. president trump: thank you president we have had a wonderful stay and it's been quick but the people of poland have been fantas

. >>> president trump is back in europe as the united nations hosts an emergency meeting. >> what he has done twice in his first year that some never do. >>> it is warming up out there, less fog. temperatures creeping up. the rest of the holiday week, we have nice weather to talk about. >>> u.n. security council held a meeting for threats from north korea after the country launched a ballistic missile yesterday. all of this comes as president trump lands in europe. >> the united nations is holding an open door emergency meeting to discuss threats from north korea. >> time is short. action is required. the world is on notice. >> the 15-member security council maintaining global peace and security is under increasing pressure to react to the communist nation's testing of an intercontinental missile. the second trip ahead of friday's start of the g20 summit. they are sure to discuss the latest missile launch. >> we cannot be faced with the prospect of a missile being fueled up knowing it could have a nuclear war head. >> the president was asked about the i tinnary and a face to face wit

europe is a blessing to the west and to the world. [applause] president trump: 100 years after the entry of american forces into world war i, the transatlantic bond between the united states and europe is as strong as ever, and maybe in many ways stronger. this continent no longer confronts the specter of communism, but today we are in the west and we have to say, there are dire threats to our security and to our way of life. you see what is happening out there, they are threats. we will confront them. we will win, but they are threats. [applause] [chanting] president trump: we are confronted by another oppressive ideology, one that seeks to export terrorism and extremism all around the globe. america and europe have suffered one terror attack after another. we are going to get it to stop. during a historic gathering in saudi arabia, i called on the leaders of more than 50 muslim nations to join together to drive out this menace which threatens all of humanity. we must stand united against these shared enemies, to strip them of their territory and their funding and networks in -- and networks and any form of ideological support that they may have. while we will alw

interlocutor between europe in the united states. the british prime minister is very weak and right now going through its own crisis with brexit. the german chancellor and president famously have a cool relations and so i think this could be an attempt by mccrone to show that france is back as a diplomatic leader in the world. and offering a bit of a rest fight to mr trump with his ways of time regarding the rusher investigators i see him join us time how. is this imbroglio scene in europe is it damaging his reputation but i think it is damaging america's reputation around the world and it is clearly weighing down. this presidency both in terms of the image of the united states around the world but also the ability. of the trump administration to make decisions on these very difficult issues. actually thank you very much indeed for joining us great beer thank you. in michigan more than one hundred iraqi kristen's a fighting deportation amid an immigration crackdown ordered by the trump administration. most of the time for visa violat

europe or china. i think the continued growth in the united states is an important factor. if you look back across the per iod of growth since the financial crisis, this is a pretty strong time because you have growth in china, growth in europe and growth in united states. that's a pretty strong global backdrop got a time when there is earnings growth and monetary stimulus. vonnie: when you look at what might pose a wished to the equity rally, how closely are you watching wage growth? it's not because of its impact also labor unit cost which could have an impact on corporate earnings. that many the factor academics and market participants continue to watch closely for the reasons you cited. probability of inflation spiking but and inflation spike would be a game changer cause it would impact all of those things i talked about, central-bank policy, earnings, and perhaps global growth. in terms of the bondionship between the and equity market, when you look at the 10 year treasury yield yield and year bund expectations for how high that needs to go to impact equities, what are

europe. the united nations about to meet at the request of nikki haley.ke that live. >>> a new graduation requirement is sparking all kinds of debate in a major school district. the new rule? no high school diploma without a specific plan for the future. what does that entail exactly? we'll discuss that next. david. what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. ♪ everybody two seconds! ♪ "dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your application, it is with great pleasure that we offer our congratulations on your acceptance..." through the tuition assistance program, every day mcdonald's helps more people go to college. it's part of our commitment to being america's best first job. ♪ (b♪by crying) minutes old. ♪ a baby's skin is never more delicate. ♪ what do hospitals use to wash and protect it? ♪ johnson's® the number 1 choices in hospitals. >>> getting a high school diploma in chicago will soon require more than just meeting the minimum course requirements. come 2020, students in chicago will also have to show they have a plan for life after high s

language get in the way of what essentially is reality here, and that is that the united states -- i just came back from europe last night. the united states has viewed in europe right now as a weaker player in terms of the cohesion and effectiveness of nato not the stronger partner that every european leader including the new president of france and angela merkel, the chancellor of germany want. >> let's go outside the summit where protesters are ramping up for another day of protests. the scene yesterday was one of complete chaos. and today protester even preventing the first lady from leaving from g-20 events. i want to bring in keir simmons in the thick of the protests since yesterday. keir, i guess i could say i'm happy you don't have a helmet on at have very moment, but the situation still seems very scary. >> we are back on the streets again. let me give you a look. you saw the group of riot police here. more have just arrived, more further back, moving in to control a crowd in that direction, who are looking right now more peaceful than they did yesterday, some of the scenes that we witnessed. but thro

this is a lot of the pundits here in the united states and europe. the two have gotten off on a good footing and the both genuinely look like they're looking forward to having dinner tonight on the second floor of the eiffel tower. they talked about a number of items when they were in their bilateral meeting, from trade to climate change. of course, when it came to the press conference, the first question to president trump was about this new fire storm surounding his son donald trump jr. made more important for the fact that charles grassley, senator from iowa, said he is sending a letter from donald trump jr. asking him to come to capitol hill and testify before the senate. then there was an exchange yesterday between lindsey graham and christopher wray, president trump's nominee for the fbi when lindsey graham said well if somebody was to get an offer of a meeting like that, should they have brought it to the attention of the fbi to which christopher wray replied in the affirmative. then president trump said it was somehow the it was the obama aoe

the integration was pretty poor and when his people turned against him, the united eights, europe, and arab states bombed him until summit he pulled them out of a ditch and shot him. andjong-un looks at that says not me. the big difference between him and his mother is he is really going full speed. charlie: you have to give the devil his due, he has shown a sense of urgency that has paid off. david: urgency determination. when somebody write the history of this, it will be a history of a dead rogue country with no silicon valley to fall back on that figured out how to steal, tag, higher, and arrive -- and bribe, hire, people. charlie: is a psychology we have to get more urgency about what we are doing because opera and andrs -- because clapper others have argued we have to act as if they have a weapon here it everything we do has to be based on the premise that they have the possibility to do this? david: that is right. i just saw general clapper last week. he was with a lot of the other intelligence chiefs and this was the big theme. orear away, two years away, three years away, does