as if it is the imperial power and the united states is the colony, somehow the united states is in a subordinate position, supplying 85, i saw some literature saying that the bombs that hit where nasan hazralla was, that complex, that huge complex were between 2004 pounds, these weapons are unusual, 85 of these... into that uh structure, i don't see anything like that happening in tel aviv, i don't see any, mass murder of civilians taking place in tel aviv, so that's what i mean, there's still seems to be foot on the break, incrementalism that is doesn't correspond to how israel is acting, israel is behaving, israel and the united states together are behaving, so... it it's uh in a sense more of the same, but the anti keeps being raised, the stakes keep being raised, as i saw that display of uh all that technology over tel aviv, uh earlier today, i thought this is major transformation in the state of the world right now, there are going there is going to be uh very dramatic response. from uh us israel that uh that partnership, that partnership. okay, let's cross over now to m

what should the united states do? or they have to say: well, you know, well, it's not the same thing, well, then it's the bankruptcy of this whole idea, because what we announced, you're with us, you're in nato, we invited you, but you'll still be fired upon , or the united states said, well , listen, you russians don't respect us, we said that this is all, this is nato territory, we are protecting these three, the protocol process of ratification is just going on, where have you gone, we are destroying ours. rockets from the territory there, i do not i know poland or germany, your launchers, ladies, well, great, they will destroy, but what will happen the next day, and there are guarantees that vladimir putin will not hit romstein there, say, with his missiles, but we know that for sure, who is it guarantees, who is the person who will say, you can hit russia, and she will not respond, that is the problem with all this, that is, i precisely adhere to this point of view, that if ukraine receives a security guarantee o

does not care. at all about international law, the united states only cares about its colony, israel, and on that note, i appreciate both of you uh being with me khalid barakat out of beirout, arnold august, out of montreal. my pleasure, thank you viewers for staying with us on another spotlight. i'm marza hashim, hope to see you right here next time. goodbye. headlines and press tv: one year on, since the israely holocous in gaza, more palestinians including children are killed in the gaza strip. israeli occupation force continues air raids sent a ground invasion against lebanon killing more civilians. german police clash with anti-israel ralliers while protester held around the world in solidarity with

they don't just received the balls thrown by the united states, we lead the united states -- come to the middle of the plate. no, don't, less is more. low down, offspeed pitch. in between the pitcher and catcher, we welcome the game strategy together with our teammates. we are a good regular catcher. i am very interested and strongly hope and believe that there is no limit to human ingenuity and the u.s.-japan alliance can go further ahead. chris: thank you. i love the baseball metaphor. i find myself thinking of o htani shohei, a japanese baseball player who can both hit and pitch. let's talk about where we have been. there have been profound changes in the international system during the time you all have been involved in the relationship from the end of the cold war, collapse of the soviet union, war on terror, conflicts in iraq and afghanistan, great power competition between the united states and china. the war in ukraine of course. when you think about the evolution of this alliance and where we are today, how important do you think structural factors were in driving us? the ba

my friend patty his life in the united states began through criminal acts, legal entry into the united states. all other criminal actions into the united states but without that moment, she never would've entered the lives of almost two decades of work of new york city high school students. not only do i embrace people like patty with all of their complexities in all theiri contradictions, i celebrateem them. i celebrate those criminals and that is why i wrote this book thank you. [applause] i am happy to take any questions anyone has. yes? >> you mentioned in your book, even though. [inaudible] small country compared to the united states. what do you think the united states can learn? the impact he has? >> i think the legacy policies is something we are going to have to be as they evolve for the next few years. certainly there is much to be said about reducing the level of criminalityla established in communities. the only possible way of doing that is not through mass incarceration. through locking up people whose ties to criminal activity and to gang activity. certainly some of anti

but the second thing that draws attention is that i did not hear the warning that the united states wills consequences for iran, or maybe it's not the secretary of state's business to say such things, i think it's not the secretary of state's business, i think the final decision has not been made in washington yet, i think there are very active... consultations going on now between the united states and israel to what extent, because you know, elections are coming up now, to start a war with a completely unpredictable outcome in the middle east, it's guaranteed, to reduce your chances of winning democratic, the democratic party, so what blinken hypocritically says is that this. iran in turn will be forced, so to speak, to escalate. i expect an escalation. well, we have discovered one thing regarding israel, we have discovered an incorrect expression, and we have seen once again that netanyahu is a man without brakes, that he is ready for anything. and that he does not just need a victory, but he needs a very visible, obvious victory to extend his stay in power. do you think that this can

and zinanism has been fostering over the last few decades that israel is invincible, united states, israel together, they are invincible, nothing could touch us, they the palestinian people showed on that day with great heroism that this is false, and since then the zionism has never really recovered, they have not one year later they have not been able to defeat hamas and they admit that all right, stay with me arnold. well khalet, i mean did you expect this level of relentless atrocities to take place by the israeli regime after the october the 7th operation? i don't think uh anyone did, because uh, as much as we have witnessed israeli crimes since 1948 and even before that, in the 30s, you know, zionist militias have carried many massiker. against our people in palestine and in the arab world, i mean, you know, but to this level, no, because i think that without a full us and western support to israel, i don't think you know that could have been possible, this is a us genocide, this is the united states war crimes against the palestinian people, and it's israel is backed up by t

what does this put the position of the united states in? it would make it appear that first, that the communist venezuela, which they do not, because they are a very small minority. and second, it would make it appear that a representative of the united states was being blackmailed, that he was afraid go and to face up to these demonstrators. and i can only say that as far as our foreign policy is concerned, it seemed to me that it was essential that we not show a picture to the world of a representative of the united states, in effect, putting his tail between, his legs and running whenever the communists happened to make a threat of this type. and may i say to in that connection, i think the developments since have proved that it was right to go. right to go, because by going the communists overplayed their hands. and all over latin america. some government leaders who previously didn't believe that the communists were a real danger or that they would resort to violence, now have changed their views. and also, i think that it was a plus f

a drug overdose in the united states of america. we've got schools in the state of north carolina that are overwhelmed with children who don't even speak english because they were brought here by illegal aliens. now, what does it do to the education quality of our own children? when you put thousands of people in the schools who don't even speak their language? we know what that means. that means administrators, that means teachers, that means people who are going to focus on illegal aliens instead of american citizens. and look, i don't begrudge anybody who wants to come to the united states of america and have a better life. but i think two things, number one, they ought to do it properly come through the legal channels, come through the right way like millions of people have done in the united states of america. but more importantly, i do not think that the leadership of the united states, that the compassion of our leaders should be focused anywhere but on the best interests of the american citizenry who belong in this country. t

add, reuters reports, republicans are preparing to appeal. the results of the elections in the united statesular in those states where in those shaky so-called states, and even today, by the way, the current president of the united states of america, joe biden, said that he is afraid of what will happen after the election, actually , we are talking about possible provocations, most likely from the same donald trump. here, mr. vitaly, is the debate from. candidates for vice presidents, the general concept of how the election campaign is going now, if we are talking about it, is it is somehow changing the electoral paradigm now, are we still in those 50/50 percentages, when no one knows and no one can predict who will be the next president, i think that no one knows, no one can predict, who will be next... precisely because you do not know what the electoral college will be like, and precisely because sociology speaks of the authority of the candidate among the entire population exclusively there, in the ugly states there, in principle, sociology is still on the margin of statistical error, in

and zionism has been fostering over the last few decades. that israel is invincible, united states, israel together, they are invincible, nothing to touch us, they the palestinian people showed on that day with great heroism that this is false, and since then the zinanism has never really recovered, they have not one year later they have not been able to defeat hamas and they admit that, all right, stay with me, arnold, well, did you expect this level of rela atrocities to take place by the israeli regime after the october the 7th operation? i don't think uh anyone did, because as much as we have witnessed israeli crimes since 1948 and even before that, in the 30s, you know, zionist militias have carried many massackers against our people in palestine and in the arab world. i mean, but to this level uh, no, because i think that without a full us and western support to israel, i don't think uh, you know, that could have been possible. "this is a us genocide, this is the united states war crimes against the palestinian people, and it's israel is backed up by this full military, finan

attracting enough talent. >> if you faced obstacles overall in opening of up factories in the united states, how are you balancing a sense of, is it easy? are states making it easy? is the federal government making it easy, the dod? has there been a change? >> there are still significant barriers, so, in the case in the united states and i work in the vehicles business unit, that's what i'm most familiar with, in order to do classified work for the u.s. government, of course, we had to become mitigated. it's not impossible, but it's challenging. >> can you explain that for a minute, just what the acronym means. >> stands for fortune ownership and controlling interest, so to oversimplify, it's essentially a firewall between my company and the united states, american rheinmetall. my boss who runs it does not report to germany, he reports to the director. there are two employees, one is a german, one from the united kingdom and outside who are not employees, who are u.s. citizens has to outnumber the inside directors so they can vote down anything that's not in the united states national inter

strategy and the plan deserve attention, and he supports the position of the representative of the united states organization of the united nations. victory plan, roman petrovich, yes, i think it will be worth it. to begin our analysis, we understand that this is an extremely ambitious request from ukraine, we will hope that the united states will agree to all points of this plan, but, as the classics said, option b is also possible. well, with the caveat that some moments may not be covered from the side of the united states. we would like to believe that everything will be smooth, but we understand that real politics, unfortunately, sometimes gives very unpleasant results. decision, in this situation the most interesting thing is that neither the official discussion of this document in the united states of america is already underway, nor the writing of it in kyiv, so that at least some conceptual drafts of this document would be seen in ukraine or made public . why do analysts today use the fact that... they are from the interview of president zelenskyi or from from the american or european p

, japan and korea and an expert on north korea and has worked for many years with the united states to enhance our capabilities to address pyongyang's increasing provocations. ambassador cho most recent a working with the president on his pivotal state initiative and maybe we'll hear about that and it's a great privilege to welcome him this morning. thank you so much, ambassador. [applause] >> well, good morning, everyone. thank you nadia, for your kind interaction. i first thank you to hudson institute for hosting tonight's forum. i'm so delighted to join you and pleased that leading korean companies are represented here today as well, along with many of friends. to me, this week is truly a week of defense industry. on tuesday i had the pleasure of visiting a u.s. annual 2024 meeting and annual expedition to see the exciting ways more technology is deployed to advanced military employment. the korean parallel in particular a display of fascinating product produced by korean defense industry. as our global economic partnership continues to flourish, the companies here today have pla

sworn an oath to uphold the constitution six times in my career, including as vice president, as a united statesenator, and as a top law enforcement officer of the largest state in our country. responsible for upholding and enforcing the laws of the state and the united states was the work i did. and i have never wavered in upholding that oath. and i have always executed it faithfully and without reservation. [applause] and therein lies the profound difference between donald trump and me. he, who violated the oath to uphold the constitution of the united states of america, and make no mistake, he, who if given the chance, would violate it again. donald trump lost the 2020 election. [cheers and applause] and as you have heard and know, he refused to accept the will of the people and the results of an election that was free and fair. as you have heard, he sent an armed mob to the united states capital, where they assaulted law enforcement officers. he threatened the life of his own vice president and refused to engage in the peaceful transfer of power. and let us be clear about how he intends to u

of america and for the elections in the united states. is happening now is conditionally in a triangle. iran, israel and lebanon. who benefits more? trump? is it harry? well, rather to trump. it's hard to say, you understand, on the one hand, it benefits trump, who blames democracy, they are determined. on the other hand, the democratic electorate, there are a lot of people, who believe that israel is using excessive force and they may believe that if they vote. for the democrats, the united states will continue this policy, and if trump becomes president, well, israel will generally feel much more confident in the middle east, that is, both parties are playing their electorate, on the other hand, biden and harris, they support israel in the destruction shit, and thus do not forget about that electorate that sympathizes with israel in their own party, they just have to. well, how to say it, to maneuver, trump does not need to maneuver, and his supporters say that biden wants to contain israel, and israel is actually on the verge of a new

sworn an oath to uphold the constitution six times in my career, including as vice president, as a united statesks and as the top law enforcement officer of the largest state in our country. responsible for upholding and enforcing the laws of the state and the laws of the united states was the work i did. and i have never waivered in upholding that oath, and i have always executed it faithfully and without reservation. [ applause ] and therein lies the profound difference between donald trump and me. he, who violated the oath to uphold the constitution of the united states of america, and make no mistake, he, who if given the chance, would violate it again. donald trump lost the 2020 election. and as you have heard and know, he refused to accept the will of the people and the results of an election that was free and fair. as you have heard, he sent an armed mob to the united states capitol where they assaulted law enforcement officers. he threatened the life of his own vice president and refused . he threatened the life of his own vice president and refused to engage in the peaceful transfer of

over what are the united states and china competing? are they competing toward to common set of rules, over who gets to set the rules for the other to follow? are they competing in a contest for power in which rule following is not even important? what is the end state that the united states wants to achieve for the bilateral relationship, et cetera. and the biden administration has found itself trying to answer some of these questions in the domestic political sphere, so i tend to think that we might go in one direction or the other. so what are those directions? well, one alternative, which is certainly not engagement approach, would be in a valid cold war kind of approach in which the united states would say what beijing often alleges, that the united states is seeking the containment of chinese power and influence in the world. and that might sound appealing from the cold war and that's one of the reasons that has conceptual roots for americans, although, we should not forgot that during the cold war, containment was actually quite

i'm upgrading to the united states for the past 2 years. a lot of folks has been coming today and i'd state from 80. i came from the mediterranean federal program, otherwise known as the biden program. and so they have been migrating the lead to the 9 states being a lot of chaos as well as instability that has played the country since the assassination of show to them or use. and with games, you know, making it a safe for folks to be in haiti, more than that. hundreds of thousands of boats have left the country in search of a better life in the united states. and i think it's important for us to conceptualize that in the met. right. because says all of this has been happening in the united states. patients are continuing to be reported. all folks are not getting the care that is needed or given the support that is needed to do then um, what's currently happening in the country. and as these folks are migrating right legally to the writing program and other pathways, right. i think it's really important that we embrace these folks in our comm

look at the economic impact of immigrants, immigrants are often times saving the economy in the united states. and there's a new report out um by a non partisan entity that's looking at the next decade. and they've stated that they believe that due to increased integration, arrogance will continue to contribute over 7 trillion dollars um and boosting the economy of the united states over the next decade. i also think if you look at the social security and unemployment programs, those individuals who are not us citizens pay into in working in the united states, but also the benefit of so for instance, if you're a haitian immigrant on temper of trade status, you may be entrepreneur success rate for years pain into social security programs that you'll never be able to take advantage of unless you become a citizen. and as the previous speaker side right now, there's not actually a pathway for citizenship, for so many individuals coming into the united states. what obtain temperature the status of your here on the manager info. so these patients have been around for multiple decades. and individua

the united states and the west, to destroy russia as the main revisionist, while it exists, russia, there will be no world order under the rule of the west, this is what he explains, and he explains it in such a way that everyone understands what follows from this, this is what follows from this, that we have years ahead, decades, decades, 10 years, i don’t know, i can’t measure. here, but no, so to speak, alternative, to clarifying relations with the americans, fundamental in the same pledge we don't have it, we won't be able to find it, in general the essence of the historical moment is, forgive me for the tautology, conscious that it is incredibly historical, because history is generally a space of duty, you... can do what and must do what you must do in history, if you refuse this, you disappear , your destiny disappears , your purpose disappears, you disappear as a people, as a civilization, as a state, note that everything that is played out, is played out in this modality, america must do this to do, but she wants to rule the world, she likes it, she robs everyone, this is the main

, believe that the key is the protection of the us coast itself, and that the interests of the united statesnot actively spread beyond the us territory. that is, the emphasis is on strengthening one's own security and on avoiding any open confrontations with other states, it is very difficult to somehow reconcile these differences, so it is quite likely that volze's speech, his foreign policy statements and jaydy vance's statements convinced their own voters, voters republican party, democratic, but here it is also important to note that it is unlikely to be a key issue of the election, since more important issues such as the economy, immigration, they are still at the top of the main priorities of american voters now, tim waltz, he was such, he was called, such a folkloric character, he is such, well, from the common people, he is liked by the average american, so to speak, but... jaydee vance, he is a good speaker, he showed himself well as a speaker and proved that he is good at speaking. still, what do the polls say, who won this debate, was it a tie, or is anyone as victorious as the po

because the united states fully backs this, the united states has deceived all the nations in the region time and time again claiming that it cares about getting to a cease fire with gaza, it doesn't, it will not restrain israel, in fact israel is fighting on behalf of the united states and its agenda in the region, and so when the region watched as missiles finally rain down on israeli military facilities, there was moment of euphoria because it felt like the tide was finally turning and that israel was being dealt a blow for all of the acts that it was committed including inside of iran itself, and this is the assassination of ismail han was not the first on iranian soil, well we could go back to 2020 as well with the... assassination qasim sulaimani in iraq and the israelis uh all but admitted to having a hand in that um but we know as well with the assassination of msen fakh as well um in tehran that also occurred in tehran at the hands of the mosad. the israelis have been carrying out assassinations like these uh for years of people to do with the iranian nuclear program

united states, kazakhstan., having balanced the energy system, china is opening up opportunities for mining in individual provinces and is beginning to increase its presence in this industry at a very significant pace, to regain its lost positions. at the same time, it makes sense to say that china has never lost them. fully retaining its leadership in the development and supply of equipment, which we still have to - let's say, catch up with, and therefore china certainly remains a significant player at the global level, a large number of chinese equipment, chinese industry participants are located in other countries, and china is now returning to itself - energy, this is a surplus of associated petroleum gas, we have now launched several projects to use associated petroleum gas to generate electricity and carry out mining activities, so russia. russia's strengths are a competent personnel base, a powerful energy industry, a surplus of the same associated, associated petroleum gas, our climate, this attracts in

, he even refused reports from the united states intelligence services. and said that he does notall these documents, he is not interested in it, he works differently, he selects some people whom he trusts. the quality of these people is already on the conscience of donald trump. these people can live either in their own world, or be guided by some narratives that are beneficial to those with whom they themselves cooperate, and they put all this delusion in his head and he then broadcasts it, this is reality. and by the way, it is necessary to clearly understand that when he becomes the president of the united states, if he becomes, then it will be what it will be. determine his policy, well, me i'm not talking about anything else, you see that zelensky met with him, but can we say that he convinced him of something, no? trump continued to repeat in the presence of zelensky that he is on good terms with zelensky, and he is on good terms with putin, that putin wants to stop the war, and that this is a wonderful vision, and that this is the way to act, and it is necessary to underst

and now it's become normal in the united states.oes it bother me that the country is walking on very thin ice? i think it's a little weird. if you sat down with zelensky and putin, what do you think you could talk to them about? you did something very funny during your debates in the primaries, when you accused the other candidates of not knowing the name of a single region where they wanted to send money and troops, which would lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, they don't even know the names of the regions of ukraine, it was great. much more than they expected, and actually russia had promised that nato would not expand. this is a pretty uncomfortable fact for some people in america, but in the early nineties, james baker promised mikhail gorbachev, he said nato would not go an inch further than east germany. well, nato has expanded much more since the fall of the ussr than it did when the ussr existed. i think if we can make a decent deal that gives russia the guarantees in what they see as nato expansion in v

and we buy more injuries to the migrants who are getting into coming to the united states. but sometimes we find more deaths but what we don't buy is we don't buy our way out of people wanting to make a new life in the states. so when you're listening politicians you know ask yourself are we more of the same? and then demanding that they don't do that anymore, they don't have good ideas, then they might not be the person for for for the position. and if the best ideas are just a rehashed, revamped of the old thing. only on steroids. then, then that's that's the sign of a politician who doesn't know a whole lot about the way migration works and is wedded into a fantasy version of migration or somebody who is whose imagination is too poor to want them leading a city or. all right. or, god forbid, a country. well, if the governor are really serious, how many corporate actions pay fines are going to jail for hiring undocumented people? right. almost there. a employer sanctions have been part of immigration laws in 1986 and reagan was president. they signed the immigration reform

america's too many missiles hit the ground simultaneously for anybody to believe the notion that the united states and israel um you had effective defense so what i saw states is are united states defenses on the ground in israel or did they all come from naval ships ships in the mediterranean? no, i believe that the united states has both, we we have the ships which provide the the bulk of it in terms of the numbers, but we've also deployed one and maybe two thad batteries. that are um a more advanced um uh intercept capability than the uh patriot. we also may have some patriot batteries on the ground, especially since we put american troops on the ground, we'll be protecting them with american uh assets. we would never allow american troops to be deployed and only have israeli. assets on them, we we provide our own forest protection, so you we have ground base interceptors in israel uh as well as the sea-based interceptors. is netanyahu afraid, is he scared? it's hard for me to get in, i know he's fearful of his political future. um, he's somebody who's been saying he wants to have this decisive

what is the comparison with the united states? united states, the g d. p is last see about 2425 trillion. so you understand russia is to trillion the united states 2425 trillion no contest. no one should ever imagine that even the soviet union and the patch or russian now is some kind of economic competitor of the united states never was, isn't now, only the height of the cold war would make one think like that. and that's it. something you should correct if you've never had it explained to you. now let's move to try and what's the g d p last year of china? again, the debates about how you accounted but order of magnitude, $1718.00, trillion dollars way more important that russia, but still not the size of the united states. or although it's catching up. and most people believe at current rate, so they can amik road. china will surpass the united states by the end of this decade, and it has been catching up, let's remember, 50 years ago, which in historical time is a moment. 50 years ago china was among the poorest countries on earth. and now it is the o

the united states army. he has already signed the militia act of 1862, which, for the first time since the revolution authorized, since the enlistment of blacks as soldiers in the united states army. and so his i would free none of the slaves simply is not on the table and the goal is to free all the slaves and as he says in that letter this reflects my position as president. my personal goal is that all men everywhere can be free. okay. so that's what this war is about. but the war is of course also a civil war a conflict between neighbors, a between people who knew each other before the war. lincoln was actually kind of friendly with alex stevens when they served together for one term in congress. so this is the classic civil war and civil wars are often far more brutal than conventional wars, although not always, obviously. there's nothing more than the than german war in 1939 to 1945. and that is not a civil war. what is going on with czar putin is not a civil war. it is an attack on another country. and

look, i think trump will do enormous damage to the united states.in his first term. i think he'll do more in the second term. some of it may be irreparable, but i do not consider him an existential threat to the united states. you don't? do you not listen to people like the former chairman of the joint chiefs, mark milley, who says that trump, this is according to bob woodward's new book, war, trump, quote, is a total fascist to the core. he is now the most dangerous person to this country's future. do you not listen to these people? i don't think trump has the mental capacity to have a world view that comprises any kind of coherent system. i will say again, he will do damage, but not existential damage. do you recognise that between being an ok president and being an existential threat, there's a category of somebody who can do a lot of damage but is neither one or the other? that's my point. i think you should assess the threat accurately and not overstate it and not understate it. i listened to trump's own words, not only on the domestic front as

who is the president and vice president of the united states? if kamala harris believes these policies are going to make american citizens more prosperous, she is welcome to try them right now. what i can't get over is a person who runs on promising to do something. she has got a job right now. she ought to do it. if her ideas were so good they would help american citizens now. it is telling that instead of implementing these policies she just talks about them. because that is what people in washington do. career bureaucrats and politicians who talk about doing things. donald trump actually got stuff done, and that is why we have to put him back in the white house. let's do one more question and then i want to leave you all with one final thought about voter turnout. >> thank you so much for this question. as we know, alcoholism and/or addiction does not discriminate based on race, education, socioeconomic status, gender, or anything else. clark county has seen an increase in fentanyl fatalities. approximately 297% increase in the last couple of

the student said, what is a job of a united states senator? part of it is voting in washington for votes that are important to the state of wyoming. also protecting and promoting wyoming. our jobs, economy, environment, people, special places, resources, and values. there are people in washington who do not understand wyoming and are a threat to the future of our state. those are the people i am fighting every day on behalf of the people of wyoming. i want to continue that fight and i ask for your vote. >> two minutes for an opening statement. mr. morrow: i'm grateful that you showed up. you didn't have to. you are the incumbent. the incumbent for the house did not show up because she didn't have to. thank you. i also want to thank mr. peck who has been communicating with me so i knew what was going on, which is helpful when you're going to a debate. i want to thank all of these people who took the time out of their busy days to come and listen to john and i debate the issues. and i hope we debate them. i would like to tell you something about

state of israel is inherently n. t jewish. a claim he made once again at the united nations general assembly last month, the single god of the one. and only joys states continues to be a moral stain on the united nations. it has made this once respected institution, contemptible in the eyes of decent people everywhere. but so many palestinians reject signing them as the drive of saint le colonialism that dispossessed them of the lands during the founding of israel, but not above or catastrophe in 1948. so esign us to military forces violently driving around $750000.00 palestinians from the homes. but many jews have also spoken out against signing some ultra orthodox troops have regularly protested against the state of israel and its ongoing occupation of palestinian lands. the, in spite of the debates, these being a steep rise in both and does seem its ism and as i'm a phobia worldwide since october, the 7th, last year recorded. and he's the music incidents in the united states increased 388 percent in the full weeks after october 7th. well, the number of is on the p

as a guide for what they should do next, it keeps coming back to where is the united states at this moment, completely preoccupied by their own politics and no matter what happens in november there is this overall feeling that there will be less u.s.. then getting just to you very quickly to lynn's point that she was talking about, bricks, g-7, shanghai corporation, we are seeing increasingly strange bedfellows of countries getting together in various configurations all with the absence [indiscernible] intertwining of all of the conflicts traditional conflicts we are talking about here because nontraditional in the ways that countries are aligning themselves so the war in ukraine involves china, north korea, iran and the efforts to support russia. south korea and japan for reasons more related to events lynn was talking about in asia have tried to be supportive to ukraine and also interested in how european security plays out so this gets back in terms of what the big idea the big idea we have to get our act together here and this is of course [indiscernible] but we won't be ab

the united states wrote an article in foreign affairs called the strategy for renewing america. what is this strategy? let's listen now. after russia unleashed the war, some in the united states argued that american support for ukraine would divert resources from the confrontation with china. our actions have proven the opposite: the confrontation with russia played a decisive role in ensuring an unprecedented rapprochement between asia and europe, which increasingly view their security as indivisible. the global coalition in support for ukraine. the most striking example of financial burden sharing that i have seen in my career. since the beginning of the conflict , washington has given ukraine $94 billion in aid, while partners from europe, asia and other regions have given almost $148 billion. a total of $242 billion. today i saw that the czech republic adopted a budget for next year, it was $12 billion. ukraine received $242 billion. has anyone ever received so much money from the west? yes, indeed, the united states has turned the ukrainian issue into a decisive battle for

the united states as well. but the american exhibits would be showcasing how an american family lives, how an american family functions. what are the latest technologies? and you may and you will remember this because it's very, very famous. the first one was the great kitchen debate of vice president nixon at that time went to the soviet union to open the first exhibit in 1959 that believe in moscow extremely popular, that showcased a typical american home of 1959. and it sparked that moment in diplomatic relations called the kitchen debate, where khrushchev tried to debate that the communists system, the soviet system was superior, and nixon debated that the capitalist american system was better. it captured the mood of the times. and then i eisenhower made a very bold gesture, something that previous other presidents would not have done. he invited khrushchev to come to the united states. and again, you may recall in 1959 of khrushchev comes to the united states quite a sensation, goes to disneyland, has new

partners, well, let's look at october 12 and ramstein, who will also gather the leader of the united states, biden and the president. zelenskyi, who is announced as somewhat breakthrough, serious. it is obvious that zelenskyy stated before that that diplomacy and force should go hand in hand and that is the only way they work together. that is, it is obvious that there will be certain details, let's say, of those agreements that were reached in washington. based on biden's recent tweet, then it is possible to assume that something, something serious will be said there. perhaps for part of the billions, the invitation of ukraine to nato, and perhaps for the permission of our partners to strike deep into russia, not the united states, but european partners, and the united states will say that they are not against it, i think that biden until the end of the election campaign such a decisive step will not be taken, perhaps some other positions will appear now not in the budget terms, but in 8 plus in a specific amount. and the dates of the supply of the necessary armaments to ukraine, including

the united states is moving military forces to the middle east to contain iran. the pentagon plans to increase the number of f-15e, f-16 and a10 combat aircraft. increasing the number of fighters is of great importance, as they play an important role in the destruction of iranian drones. well, perhaps the americans are not unfoundedly worried. the united states in iraq, here, of course, vladimir vladimirovich, a question arises, we heard matthew miller's statement and biden's statement, everything is very convoluted, very ambiguous. what plans might the united states have in the middle east, or are they still trying to figure things out themselves, because netanyahu has gotten out of control. under control, you see, they say, as if we are consulting, conducting consultations, but these consultations are aimed at reaching some kind of diplomatic agreement, and biden in this regard, i think, is not even being disingenuous, it's just he doesn't finish the sentence: until the elections in the united states of america, then let the grass not grow, then you can do what

information program. >> i could sum them up by saying it is our purpose to make the united states policy everywhere intelligible and wherever possible to explain not only what we do that why we do it into attempt to demonstrate for all the mass media that we have which other free men may choose not to brief capsule very good summary are we winning the world propaganda. >> i don't think anyone can say who is winning i think it's true to say that good policy makes good propaganda we stand not first but fourth we are behind russia, china and the united arab republic. in certain areas we are in the vernacular outgunned the communist countries will produce more books in translation the foreign countries in a given year then were we. makertain areas we progress and others we lose a little ground what we do and what were able to do is to a large extent determine what actually happens in this country, for example developments in alabama in the old days when i would work for the government i would've thought the picture the brooding bus would've been centered and a photographer had to be v

united states is driving it. israel is the proxy of the united states and and the united states is practicing in the middle east through israel exactly the same proxy war that is that is carrying on with through by means of ukraine against russia. that has to be clear either to understand how the... countries around will react, and what are the limits on iran's possibility of meeting the challenge? iran is facing the united states, not just israel, and i think your leadership knows that perfectly well, the general public does not aware does not know that, because i think mr. netanyahu is is drawing mr. biden around by the nose, that isn't the case. all right, and what about the issue of lebanon, could you address that too? that was a part of our question is a further provocation. directed against iran. israel by itself at this point cannot take on iran, it has to bring the united states in. israel is waiting for for iran to be so provoked that it will take a dramatic action, which will you be used by the united s

the zionist state in continue its war against gazza and as well against lebanon now, and if the united state and those country did not support the scientist state with any uh weapons, i believe that hamas could have actually at this point defeated uh the thesign state army they could actually at this point have liberated many areas in palestine and this show you the weakness of the so callalled israeli regime and it shows as well that thanks to that support from the us the israeli regime will not exist and i believe that if the israeli regime will try to conduct any attack against iran i believe that iran as they say and as they warn they will conduct a major attack against the scient state of israel uh uh inside uh occupied the palestine, but i think that the iranian should as well send a clear warning to all neighboring countries, especially like jordan, saudi arabia and other countries in the bergian gulf that if they will allow uh the israeli regime fighterjet to use their airspace, this mean this country is part of that attack and those countries and their infrastructure will come under

we don't make any masks at all in the united states. think for many, the the coronavirus pandemic highlighted the problems of extremely long supply chains of exporting the production of basic everyday goods to places you may never go or never visited. on the other side of the world. and that's sort of a silly, trite involving the masks. but if you think about the all of the metals and minerals that are needed for the energy transition that you just sort of magnify the the complexity of the problem then you start to see why it's so important to focus on where these are. china realized years ago that the world was going electric and so it has focused not only on rare earths we were discussing earlier, but it's also focused on the production of lithium as well as copper it's one of the it's the world's largest copper producer. it also is a major nickel producer. invest heavily in indonesia, for instance, where a lot of nickel is being processed and produced when you tear down rainforests, which is obviously not popular with a lot of conser

you not so, this will worry us, because the unity of the socialist camp... will be violated, the united statesdoing the same, maybe not so directly, and by the way, this doctrine does not have a name, but nevertheless it is clear that thousands of people and the state department and the cia control the elites in this sense , political processes in other countries, well, finally, the third very important justification for the dominance of the united states for many centuries, and this is a situation when it seems that there is no alternative to this dominance, that this regime... in all these three key provisions of non-military, so to speak, non-material dominance or maintaining hegemony for the united states, here is a complete failure, in this sense, in a situation where i have no military superiority over the russian federation, and even less over china, this understanding of the hopelessness in achieving the goal, maintaining its hegemony leads to the conclusion, should lead, may... lead to the conclusion that nuclear weapons probably need to be used, now at the end of this week in ramstan

doing to stand up for the rule of law, for our democratic ideals, and the constitution of the united states, then together, i know we can chart a new way forward, not as members of anyone party, but as americans. americans who are united in our devotion to the country we love. i thank you all. may god bless you, and may god bless the united states of america. thank you. thank you. >> we have a statement from the vice president on the settlement of the dock strike. she says, i want to applaud all involved for their efforts. this step indicates progress toward a strong progress. it indicates the power of collective bargaining. this is about fairness and our economy works best when our work is sure in record profits. dockworkers deserve a fair share for the hard work getting essential goods up to communities across america. we also have indications from the white house that president biden specifically refused to invoke taft-hartley, that would've benefited the shippers that would've forced the union back to work without an agreement. that is a pressure that the president has in a situation li

the population of the united states at the time was nearly 100 million people, with some 15 million immigrants. adding to the u.s. population between the years 1919 15. there were 48 states in the union at the time. some of the big news events, the titanic sinks in the north atlantic on april the 14th, 1912, and of course, looming two years in the future, world war one would begin in europe. nicole hemmer what were the key issues facing america. in 1912? so all of that growth that you described and all that new immigration and urbanization was was spreading during this period in time. all of that was happening because the u.s. was becoming an industrial manufacturing powerhouse. there were all of these new jobs, all of this new manufacturing work and all of these new giant corporation islands that were tremendously wealthy. and what that had created was the united states packed with people and it really defined by inequality. the people who had a lot of money had a lot of money. and others. i mean, most americans were living in poverty. and so that disparity was driving a lot of unrest in the

i would say that when you when the united states uses military in another country, the united states putting with u.s. soldiers on the line with not only enemy soldiers on the line with civilian killing in all american wars, the those are happening in our name, right? if there is carnage that's being experienced in countries in our name. shouldn't we pay attention it aren't we implicated in it don't we have we actually responsibility in this because the american people are political agency that is the that that has the capacity should they to exercise it to to restrain american war right so so the you know, the you know, one question is, you know, are there really any restraints on presidential war? and i think the most powerful examples in the aftermath of world war two were in the later years of the war in vietnam and and and work on the later years of the war, including eisenberg's new fire and rain show that the antiwar movement when americans were out in the street saying no more bring an end to this war and was after you know nixon had decided not only to bomb but to to to inva