the population, and it seems to me that the allied effort, especially the western allies, the united states and united kingdom, had great duty, to beat naziism, an evil thing to be defeated, but never allow ourselves to get away with thinking because that was the overriding concern, everything else that we did was okay, that we can't inspect our own activities, and the idea of indiscriminant bombing of civilian populations, that we did night after night, week after week, month after month; year after year, i think it does require investigation. the same with the at tom bombing of jay -- japan. we didn't do ourselves any favors. we have to learn the lessons from it, ask ourselves hard questions. the ends don't justify every mean, and so we've got to be ready to confront our past and make use of what we learn from it for the future. >> host: booktv viewers want to contact you, is there a website? >> guest: yes, if they were to look at the new college of the humanities, that's the college of which i'm there, and they will get hold of me through there. >> host: "cheers, america," how an english

drives american foreign policy toward iran is a post cold war determination on the part of the united states to dominate middle the. at least two to play a role in the middle east to micromanage political outcomes in key middle eastern states so that those states strategic orientation is subordinated to u.s. foreign policy preferences and the middle east has a regional order which is essentially run by the united states from that perspective the problem with the islamic republic of iran is that it won't play along with this with this kind of hedging monic ambition it said it's very open to improve relations with the united states but that has to take place on the basis of equality and american acceptance of the islamic republic that's not the washington agenda for the middle east and it drives this very hostile posture toward toward iran judith agree or disagree with what we just heard. i partially agree and partially disagree i think that what drives american policy in iran remains the fact that the iranian revolution was hostile to the united states we lost a key ally it was very costly to

government i mean it's like the non-state actors in libya were enabled by the united states and later now the non-state actors are being enabled by the united states and its allies in syria and we you know we can be pretty sure that in ten years time the president then will be waging a new war on terror against these terrible non-state actors who are enabled by you know obama just like you know we spent twenty thirty years fighting it's al qaeda who were enabled in the 1980's michael basically america's enemy is blowback isn't it. well absolutely i mean you have to go back a long ways to find an example of a war or some sort of military intervention the united states was involved in where there was not where there was actually a happy ending some people would argue that iraq sort of winding down well but that's clearly not true we see all of that on the daily bombings that are happening there afghanistan is a disaster in the sense that we been there for more it's the longest war the united states is ever been involved with and you know as a south asia unless i really worry what'

in the united states. apple's tax director acknowledged to the subcommittee staff that it was his opinion that aoi is functionally managed and controlled in the united states. the circumstances with asi and aoi appeared to be similar. our legal system has a preference to respect the corporate forum. the facts here presents this issue and these offshore corporations are so totally controllecontrolled by apple, inc. that their identity is separate companies is a sham and mere instrumentality of apparent and if so whether apples claims aoi nasi owes no taxes as a sham as well. aoi sits at the apex of the tax avoidance strategy. apple's claim that aoi and its other subsidiaries are not tax resident in any nation is the key element in his strategy to avoid taxes on its offshore income. how did that income end up offshore to begin with? that brings us to a second more common arrangement shifting income away from the united states to a low tax jurisdiction for what is called transfer pricing. many u.s. companies

can please everybody in that region by not doing anything is simply untrue ok mo maybe if the united states stopped droning people some people would be happy ray you want to jump in go ahead. i think jay is absolutely right the key seems to me that when hillary clinton the secretary of state says assad regime has to go yes well that gives that provides a catalyst for each and every little terrorist group to make sure they're the ones that make it go and the unexpected or the the anticipated support by the united states is what keeps this thing going in my view so if the united states gets together with russia an interested party and brings people to the table that's the solution to this thing not arming still more rebels for regime change ok raymond i'm going to the last word thirty seconds regime change regime change from within. requires an organized opposition the mujahideen in iran is an organized opposition to bring one hundred thousand plus people to pay or separate mark a bad bad almost everyone's a topic for another program gentlemen we have run out of here in these are many thanks

is going to go to war with the country in the united states or that the united states will be victim of an attack coming from some from the from sed state actor i just don't i can't imagine that happening ok george i find the definition so vague that it's very helpful to the pentagon and people that like to go to war for a lot of different reasons george yeah absolutely the enemy changes you know every few years and then that enemy changes back again so so we have a some point that saddam hussein was a friend then he became an enemy. and then we kind of forgot about him then became enemy number one again then back in the ninety's the enemy was suddenly you know you couldn't pick up a newspaper without vehement denunciations of the serbian government and how america has the bombs. they need with any was iraq again then afghanistan at various times you know others of rear their heads you know. rand paul here that was also rans i always like your little ranzo you know exactly exactly iran is a pig of a permanent you know sometimes it disappears and then reappears again so there's

there are only about 200 citizens and, and today about 50,000 of them live in the united states. the largest populations live in guam to hawaii. congress approved the agreement in 1986, the legislation stated in the" approving the compact, it is not the intent of congress to cause any adverse consequences for the united states territory and commonwealth or the state of hawaii." nevertheless, hawaii state government incurred significant costs to provide education, health care and other services to migrants. in 2011 alone hawaii's cost for migrants totaled approximately $115 million. that is a lot of money for a small state like hawaii. the bottom line is migrants are present in the united states because the federal national security policy. it is only fair the federal government's share part of the cost for providing services to them. all ye spends 30 million-40 million per year to provide health care to migrants. the way to share it is to make this available for migrants. my amendment does not address the cost incurred by the state of hawaii, only the health care costs. but of cou

they got less united states of america. may god bless the united states of america.oning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2013] >> resident willard -- president obama will address the graduating class at the u.s. naval academy tomorrow. we will have live coverage from annapolis of the president's commencement speech at 10:00 a.m. eastern here on c-span. afterg to reporters president obama's counterterrorism speech, republican senators john mccain, nz graham, and kelly ayotte weighed the closing of guantÁnamo bay prison. this briefing is 30 minutes. this is not anoon. press briefing but a slideshow. i am joined by my colleagues, senator saxby chambliss, the ranking member on the senate intelligence committee, senator lindsey graham, from armed services and defense appropriations, and senator kelly ayotte. all four of us have been deeply involved in the issues that the president of the united states articulated his ideas and proposals on. there are some areas where we are in agreement with the president, som

is the popularity of the united states is this rock bottom of the party sort. of pews research poll to keep only for the eleven percent and one percent of you saying yeah jordan is bug you start at the very bottom so that we have to kind of do some policy analysis the assessment is drone a good policy to fight terrorism especially when obama says he's not going to be big on carter charism or he's going to have a light. colored target of a fifth of the policy well armed services he's seeing that but in the other d. he's defeating the purpose of the very very very very basic interest of the united states government that is gaining some sort of the leverage with the parties on the government especially you especially you know now he has the use of this he has not done that in the past not time for him is is this. as you have serious dialogue. here folks we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on pakistan's day started. dangerous experiments on prisoners they want to make money and they have to use healthy guinea

launch some sort of attack on the united states it can't happen. i mean it really is i think the main concern is non-state actors the main enemy is non-state terrorism i think the main threat is that there would be some sort of terrorist attack on the united states i'm not saying that's going to happen but i don't think we live in an era where countries are or were the united states is going to go to war with the country in the united states or that the united states will the victim of an attack coming from some from the from sed state actor i just don't i can't imagine that happening ok george i find the definition so vague that it's very helpful to the pentagon and people that like to go to war for a lot of different reasons george there is absolutely the enemy changes you know every few years and then that enemy changes back again so so we had a some point that saddam hussein was a friend then he became an enemy. and then then we kind of forgot about him then became enemy number one again and then back in the ninety's the enemy was suddenly you k

the way that i look at this is, of its profits% in taxes, in the united states. i don't know exactly where this stacks up relative to other companies, but i would guess it is extremely high in the list. i know with the $6 billion, we united top pair in the ne states. we do have a low tax rate outside the united states. but this tax rate is for products that we sell outside the united states, not within. the way i look at this, there is no shifting going on. in addition, if you look at apple versus other companies that do not sell in the u.s., i would say the applicable comparison would be the 30.5% effective rate. not our foreign tax rate. >> a little simpler. why does aoi exist echople? why was aoi incorporated in ireland? 4000 employees is impressive, but not when you look at your overall workforce. maybe you can clear that up. >> thank you very much for question. aoi was created in 1980. in this time, apple was -- before the days of the iphone and ipad an ipod and things were even invented. the mac did not matter until 1984. apple was looking for a place to dis

and the industry in the united states was the only distribute united states had the only -- the united states had the only major undestroyed industry in the world. our dollar became the method of currency for the globe, american industry penetrated into every corner of the globe and american no-how and ingenuity was established across this planet. that -- know how and ingenuity was established across this planet. that's because of the pillars of american exceptionalism that i talked about and the spirit of ingenuity. a spirit of ingenuity which is the beneficiary of those willing legal immigrants that came here because they realized that they could achieve their dreams better here than anywhere else. and so the magnet of the american dream has attracted the best and most vigorous people on the plan tote come here. that's the america -- planet to come here. that's the american that i was born into. that's the america that those of us who were born here inherited. many immigrants have come since that period of time to contribute to this american dream, to help redefine this american drea

no matter what with all due respect anybody would be a better mediator than the united states almost literally anybody because united states has shown such a degree of bias and is so closely connected to the israeli position on so many issues here is the message i would have been in the book for others i mean is this not a vital interest for europeans for russia for india for china they get their energy from the middle east this is a vital interest for them america doesn't get its energy from the middle east it's going to be energy sufficient like russia very soon but the countries that. their energy from the middle east have a vital interest in doing something about this and they have just but they've done very very little i think they have to push a lot harder for a little more fairness a little more even handedness in mediating this conflict dr rashid khalidi thank you very much for your time it was a pleasure thank you. i . saw. the elizabeth. going down of the song and good morning we will remember that we will. that. he. he. told. her mother. must be. told. her. her wish

mexico is heavily dependent on the united states of america.gave them a $60 billion trade surplus last year which is responsible for over 100% of their gdp growth. we buy something like 20 to 25% of all they produce. we buy their oil. so there's a real close relationship here, and barack obama doesn't have to be too reticent in pushing the united states interest when it comes to the cartels and when it comes to the border. >> eleanor. >> i wouldn't call a great relationship where we export all this goods to them, them being dependent on us. i think this new mexican president comes in with a pretty strong hand. the growth in mexico is twice where it is in this country. they discovered some oil in mexico, and i think he's made a decision that he doesn't want to outsource the drug fighting to u.s. police and border guards, that he wants to take over that. it wasn't working under the previous president who had thousands of people who were killed so let's see if his new approach works. the point is, the u.s. isn't the only game for mexico. they're d

those being commissioned in the united states navy. i present 764 midshipmen to the commission into our united states navy. >> thank you very much. >> thank you, captain clark. you're flying now. that is not in osprey. thank you for being here. mr. president, admiral miller, dean phillips. it is an honor for me to be bringing in the future here today. i would like to congratulate the new second lieutenants. for those about to become ensigns, i want to ask you to remember what we talked about a few weeks ago. look, i like odd-numbered classes. i want to give you an executive summary of a few things. as the president mentioned to you earlier, i want you to guard your integrity. no one can take your integrity away from you. it is uniquely yours. do not lose it. your allegiance is to the institution, to the country, to the constitution. not your buddies. it is in your oath today. think about it when you take your oath. be kind to everybody. treat everyone with unity and with respect. and trust your shipmates, because your life is going dep

the people of the united states on the presidential papers and all of the artifacts, including all offts that were given to us by heads of state from other countries. they are seen as gifts to the people of the united states. those are all held here, in a huge warehouse that is below us. of course, there are no windows or any way that light might affect the documents and the archives. the united states government will own this part of our presidential center -- the museum, the library, the warehouse. it will be administered by the national archive. obviously, we raised the money privately to build the building, before we give it to the u.s. government. then, we give a certain percentage of the money raised to the u.s. government as an endowment for this part of the building. the bush institute, which is the policy arm of the bush center, where george and i will spend the rest of our lives working on the policies that were most important to us, is separated from this building by a courtyard. the bush foundation owns that building, and will obviously do all of the uptake on that buildin

more critical because both the united states and united kingdom face the challenge of meeting global threats in a new era of constrained resources. as our department under goes management review here, secretary hammond and i discussed the defense strategy and effort to rebalance forces. d.o.d. has gained many useful insights from british experiences and our staffs coordinate closely on strategy and defense planning. we will also continue to work closely together to ensure the nato aligns has the capabilities needed for the future which will be a focus of a nato defense ministerial next month we will both attend. i look forward to seeing secretary hammond there and continuing our discussions today, tonight as to how we continue to build an effective partnership around the world. again, thank you secretary hammond and welcome. we are glad you are here. >> thank you very much. i'm delighted to be here. i'd like to thank secretary hagel for his warm welcome. as you know i enjoyed a close relationship with your predecessor and i'm glad we were able to pick up where we left off in discussi

he's defeating the purpose of the very very very very basic interest of the united states government that is getting some sort of the leverage with the parties on the government especially you especially you know the years that use he has not done that in the past not time for him is is this. to have serious dialogue with a party. and hear folks talk about we're getting into a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on pakistan stay with our team. dangerous experiments on prisoners they want to make money and they have healthy guinea pigs in the regular society they're not able to use prisoners i mean more they wish they could. drug tests on human guinea pigs. paid to deadly pills he didn't pass away he was killed. he didn't pass away they let him die. is pharmacy really about helping people. in. iraq. don't tell me how much on my. prime. counting on. me. more news today violence is once again flared up. to these are the images the world has been seeing from the streets of canada. the giant corporations are today. download the official. language stream qu

than the united states -- withdrew, but they ignored that also. ow can we punish this state to take our thing is thank you. >> third question, lady in the back. >> wait for the mic upon, please. >> thank you. i'm and i running an american journalist. you spoke about different players on this issue. what about the role of iran? do you see the role of iran as positive or negative? and do you think that netanyahu insistence, israeli, their constant talk about attacking iran or the nuclear issue, is that a way to evade the new issue, which is the israeli-palestinian issue? >> let me answer them in reverse order, starting with your question or iran is a major actor in the middle east. it's a large country. something sooner or later will have to come to terms with. doesn't mean where do you with everything i read is iran is like turkey or israel or egypt, and it is some legitimate interest. sooner or later wil we will havo come into, recognize that while not mrs. of the grain with what they do. i think that there's been an enormous inflation of the so-ca

is that the popularity of united states is this rock bottom in the party sort. of pugh's research poll that came out only for the eleven percent and one percent of you say yeah jordan it bug you start at the very bottom so that we have to kind of do some policy analysis the assessment is drone a good policy to fight terrorism especially when obama says he's not going to be bigger target terrorism or he's going to have a light. colored target of a fifth of the policy well armed services he's seeing that but in reality he's defeating the purpose of the very very very very basic interest of the united states government that is getting some sort of a of a leverage with the parties on the government especially you especially you know now he has that use he has not done that in the past not time for him is is this. israel have serious dialogue with the parties that are i mean you have been here for talk about we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on pakistan stay with r.t. . the thinking. is a. dangerous experiment

>> yes. >> the profits that result in the americas outside the united states you pay income taxes on here? you bring them back here to the united; is that correct? as far as the americans are concerned. >> there's a selling profit in canada and brazil and in mexico. and yes, any residual profit is stowmght tax. >> you bringing the profits home. i would characterize it as apple inc. is generating the profit. >> they are generating the profit through the intelligent yule property in europe and they tattoo. i'm talk about the profit in the company are brought home. is that correct. in dan, mexico, the ones you mentioned. they are brought home. i would characterize the profit are generate bid the u.s. company. so i would not say that are brought home. they learned by. al ink inc. >> they coupe l keep the economic rights; right? >> it has, yes. that agreement is apple agreement. people sign it all work for apple. >> it's between two related parties. >> as i understand. they all work for apple, don't they? >> is there any dpowt of your mind that apple controls the agreement and can write it

visits in the united states by air. it goes on to say the cbc reduced -- friends listen to me on this line. i didn't know this was in the report. maybe that is why it never was made public. the cbp pilot process 9448 aliens subject to u.s. visits identified 44 watch lists hits. 44 watch hitlists. the csa pilot program i think that was the one in atlanta that you referred to yesterday as being a failure last week. the tsa and i'm quoting now, the tsa pilot 2296 aliens subject u.s. visits and identified 131 watch list hits. so i would say first of all they go on and talk at some length about how simple it is. it's not a complicated system. they use portable hand fingerprint readers. you come off an airplane and you are exiting the terminal. you don't need a big area. only international flights would be affected. you put your fingerprint on a machine. it air reads them instantly and you know whether or not this person is on a hit list, a watch list or has a warrant out for their arrest before it they come to the country. t

ensigns in the united states navy, second lieutenants in the united states marine corps. soon you will join the fleet. you'll leave marines. to assess u.s. challenges, so has the challenges facing our military. before you arrived here, our nation was encased in two wars. many of our alliances were strained. over the past four years, we have strengthened our alliances and restored america's image in the world. the war in iraq is over, and we welcome to our troops home. thanks to our brave personnel, we delivered justice to osama bin laden. [cheers and applause] in afghanistan, the transition is underway. our troops are coming home. by the end of next year, our war in afghanistan will come to an end. sacrifice in these wars, including 18 graduates of this academy. we honor them all. now and forever. yesterday i spoke about the way forward in the fights to keep our country secure. as we have decimated the al qaeda leadership, we still face threats from affiliates and from individuals caught up in its ideology. deploying move beyond large ground armies, we still need to condu

israel has intensive diplomacy with the united states on what it considers to be its red lines . israel is a sovereign state and doesn't do what the united states tells it to do. gives it military aid that is more important politically than it is to israel and certainly an argument for cutting the aid and should be debated. you know, but i don't think that that intervention in syria in this sense is like something for the united states. the other thing i would point out is that syria evolving into a civil war and the popings of chemical weapons getting into the hands of terrorists is a problem for all of syria's neighbors, problem for turkey and iraq and saudi arabia and a problem for a lot of american allies in the region and yet there are certain segments that i think, a small fringe that are dedicated internet users. it's all about israel. and it's just -- i don't know. host: if national security was so important in benghazi why did the republic house block the funding for state department security? guest: we know from charlie lamb deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic secr

to explore all options in order to curb the drug trade so right now unfortunately the united states is focused on the supply as opposed to the demand we are one of the most greedy in terms of consuming drugs in the world and you know simple economics tells you that if you cut down the demand the supply will shrink but we've not done that our whole policy is to go after in latin america in particular to go after the supply to spray fields with poisonous chemicals that are even affecting children such that people are having birth defects you know asthma except that's been our policy so that's why you're seeing presidents like able morales who are more on that left side really pushing back against united states because they've experienced first hand what kind of conditionality is come with a little bit of the drug war i mean well that would take away the millions tens of millions of dollars from these banks that are laundering drug money legally through the fight of course we're not going to see that and didn't you know not all of the countries are prospering in south america obviously

hartman coming up in this half hour a county in new mexico has become the first county in the united states to outlaw gas and oil extraction why did that county choose to fight back against big oil and are more communities across the country planning to do the same thing and bangladesh is one of the poorest countries in the world and the workers are among the most it's lloyd in the world but despite its poverty in third world conditions still has more of a backbone or moral compass than the united states at least when it comes to corporate criminals i'll tell you why and i'd still take. it as the rise of the new despite its wide wide range of environmental and health consequences the fact is of fracking or extracting shale rock beds is on the rise across the country and because of this growth in fracking the oil and gas industries and even the mainstream corporate media haven't been shy about saying how much our nation could benefit from this natural gas production boom even president obama noted in his state of the union speech that the production natural gas the united states has never be

he's defeating the purpose of the very very very very basic interest of the united states government that is getting some sort of the leverage with the parties on the government especially you especially you know now he has the use of his he has not done that in the past not time for him is is this. this you have serious dialogue. here folks we're getting into a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on pakistan stay started. me thinking. dangerous experiments on prisoners they want to make money and they have to use healthy guinea pigs in the regular society they're not able to use prisoners i mean more they wish they could. drug tests on human guinea pigs. paid to pop deadly pills he didn't pass away he was killed. he didn't pass away they let him die. is pharmacy really about helping people. is he to you if. you feed. welcome back to crossfire all things are considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing pakistan and drones. ok marvin in washington is the drone policy working with dividends or is it producing. because of the art obama is

what manufacturing the united states, i received a combat? >> guest: it is fair to say we are in a much better position than we were four years ago and over the last couple of years, since 2010, we've added manufacturing jobs, if little over half a million manufacturing jobs. but the first extended really that we've seen since the 1990s. so that is positive although i must say in the last year or so that job growth has wrote down quite a bit and we've seen a pretty stagnant job market in manufacturing. over the last decade or more, we saw a significant shift downward in terms of manufacturing jobs, loss of fracturing capacity, lots of global share of trade and other key measurements. so were not backed to the point we were before the great recession started, but weren't making progress. that's the first time we've been able to say that for a lot time. >> the bureau of labor statistics. our guests over half a million, but we see that bigger job loss, 6 million jobs lost between the year 2,002,009 you put them in context for us. where we see in

what relationship would have with the united states? would there be a reason to have a significant u.s. military presence on the korean and peninsula? this could increase china's comfort level with the notion of a reunified korean peninsula. i will stop there. i do want to eat into the time. on north korea's use of nuclear weapons, the use of nuclear weapons in north korea would result in there being no north korea. not just the leadership, but other things would no doubt happen. we have said this. in various forms, to the north koreans. when i was in government, i was in meetings which this was communicated very clearly, including by implication when i accompanied bill perry to john pyongyangohn yang -- in the 1990's. hy hasn't had no effect? no effect?ad don'tmy view, they intend to use those weapons for offensive.... they are useful to get our attention, to bring us to the table. changeo intimidate and the balance of power. they are a useful asymmetric tool for the north koreans. they don't have many other useful weapons in their qui

the united states, july 1944, the united states was at war, and with more than 10 million soldiers under arms, and deciding at that moment that congress actually deciding from the period january-july 1944 how, if at all, soldiers could devote. recall that the election of 1944 took place after d-day. we had soldiers on the ground in europe, and sailors on ships throughout the pacific. how could they vote? the roosevelt administration supposed that every soldier in the field, that is, soldiers who could not get absentee ballots, should be handed a federal ballot, they could fill it in, write the name dewey or president roosevelt as their preferred candidate for office. instead, a bill sponsored by james eastland of mississippi and john rankin of mississippi passed into law. and that bill was justified by eastland in the following way. these boys, hero, are fighting to maintain the rights of the states. these boys are fighting to maintain white supremacy. that's a precise quote stated on the floor of the u.s. senate. or hear one more voice. the great writer eb white, writing to the "herald"

prime minister, welcome to the united states.ting with our lovely rose garden press conference, but i think we'll be okay. >> thank you. >> translator: mr. president, my dear friend president of the united states, a friend and ally, i'm here to -- i'm once again very pleased to be here in washington to have meetings with the president. i would like to express my thanks for the hospitality that has been shown to us on this occasion on behalf of myself and my delegation. in the president's person i would like to express our condolences for the terror attack that took place in boston. we express our condolences to the american people. we are a country which has been fighting against terrorism for many years. we have lost many lives in that fight against terrorism. and so we very well understand the feelings and sentiments of the american people in face of such an event. as turkey and the united states, we are both determined to continue to fight jointly against terrorism. my dear friends, turkey and the united states have many issue

narrator: over 300 million people live in the united states. and each person uses an average of 100 gallons of water every day. man: what it takes to actually make clean water is somewhat a mystery to most customers. woman: so how does water get from the river into your house, or here at school? woman: somebody has to bring that water to us, and somebody has to take it away when we're finished with it. man: the water infrastructure is vital for disease protection, fire protection, basic sanitation, economic development, and for our quality of life. man: you just can't visualize all the assets that are under our feet. we have about two million miles of pipe in this nation. if you're walking around in an urban area, you're probably stepping on a pipe. man: our grandparents paid for, and put in for the first time, these large distribution systems. woman: and in many cases, it's not been touched since. man: we're at a critical turning point. much of that infrastructure is wearing out. narrator: our water infrastructure is made up of complex, underg

the shrinking role of the united states as a sole superpower has made the u.s. more popular rather than the us i think well since your resignation over the invasion of iraq in two thousand and three there's been a lot of u.s. led intervention around the world this being the instances of libya pressure being put on syria has been involvement in afghanistan and in pakistan so on reflection is your resignation actually achieved anything the point in leaving was to raise the domestic political cost of an absolutely stupid policy and i contributed in a small way to doing that unfortunately it is you know it is a fundamental fact of diplomatic life that domestic politics always trumps foreign national interests you know in every country in the world i mean the us actually does better than many countries in this respect but there is a an internal mechanism in every country that exaggerates the ability the the prestige the influence the competence of a country in intervening outside its borders. and the the us. is driven or rather most of the various interests that driv

charter is quite clear the united states like all other member nations of the united nations can only go to war as an act of imminent self-defense but in fact the united states by arrogating to itself the right to war anywhere against anyone all the time is clearly in violation of international law but president obama. says the administration does not violate anybody's someone to because it operates in consultation with the governments concerned the whole population of pakistan their parliament unanimously remotely opposed drone strikes and yet they continue so maybe the administration is in consultation with the government there but certainly not the people i'm going to check on me today was a prime backer with the answer coalition from our studio in washington thanks for watching. these sixty six people have been killed and many more wounded in a string of car bomb attacks in baghdad the explosions struck mostly shia areas of the iraqi capital and also a busy commercial street that the bombings hit a rock almost daily at the moment the country suffered an upsurge in sectarian violen

whether there was torture and treatment this maltreatment of prisoners there detainees there and the united states has not cooperated with that under the so-called state secrets. and we have suggested that we should cooperate with our countries there. and that's one of the recommendations of our report. not to use the state's card now and there are ways to to cooperate and to give information without harming either personnel. under the state secrets doctrine or particular treaty relationship with other countries but we're not cooperating at all assigned to stand thank you thank you very much they're ok thank you. welcome to teal one i hear you can feel it. if there are three choices in life i first used to work in i'm a killer. live on a miserable way like a slave. for a second just to jump the wall and catch the dream of most. of our. lives. just to become a number of an organisation and get inside the drug trade. to buy something will never forget. a. good sleep. made for what i've done that was never stop a. commission free credit patients three times for charges free. range month free. free st