the united states can we step to its new use and its tax on other countries. economic saying.

has had a hand in in terms of the united states' involvement south of the border. but these kinds of action s tha the united states has been involved in has been invisible to many americans so therefore i think many americans don't feel they have any obligation to these particular immigrants and so therefore it's easier to behave towards them in an inhumane or callus fashion. >> so let's go back to these children. it's incredible what's happening to them. the united states says it's trying to place many of them with family members if there are or with people known to the children if possible or else they go into some sort of state control so to speak but all obligations end once these kids are put in so-called sponsored units somewhere. what happened to you? just the emotion of being separated from your family or being put in a sponsored family who you say treated you well but nonetheless wasn't your family. >> well, now i'm the father of a four-year-old and i was four years old when i was separated from my parents so i can see through him what happened to me. when

unprecedented and striking so i am still hopeful that ultimately we can see north korea and the united statesreturn to the meeting or begin the negotiating process if you like at that negotiating table mr over or you know i feel like i'm in a state of perpetual or cautious optimism on north korea i think that the united states and north korea can find common ground and that president trump and kensington both have a stake now in. getting some sort of diplomatic victory so i hope that they'll be able to translate this into into progress and mystical are you as cautiously optimistic would you say. and i would say i share the optimism and much more so now and i did it. and i think that there have been many skeptics who have been questioning north korea's military and they have said that maybe this is another tactic but it would seem to try and delay a more sanctions so that it can continue to have time to develop nuclear arms after the cancellation of the sunny i was wondering what the north korea would react angrily as it often does but defected in a strong quite a bit it was strange and also d

do they did the exact opposite as soon as the nuclear deal was signed the united states under obama began to violate it and under trump they continued that and now trump says that no work the iranians are going to come back to the negotiating table which is absolutely i'm not settle for two reasons one is because the issues that want to put on the table for example iran's missile defense if it wasn't for iran's missile defense then the united states would be able to attack iran and secondly iran's presence in syria and iraq iran knows that if it pulls out of syria and iraq then the extremists would be able to reemerge again and then we would have a national security threat so let me jump in here are simple let me but in addition to that hang on the issue pay only go to would we go to adel before we go to the break here adele i had the impression that speech was written by the israeli foreign ministry what do you think twenty seconds before we go to the break. well i think they say these are make you be making this noise since in the mid ninety's. it's actually happening korean

are all over everyone agrees that you can't talk to the united states are simply unreliable those who are opposed to the negotiations are saying we were right and those who were for the negotiations said well we gave it a shot and we showed that there are dishonest and of course this began under obama he wasn't abiding by the agreement either but trump ended so the countries united it's much stronger today than before. it's been dealing with sanctions for a long time now and since the deal was never really implemented iran is still working around sanctions so it's much better equipped to deal with sanctions than before it's global position is much better because trump has isolated himself in countries like russia and china know that if iran grows weak it's it's not good for them either because they'll be next and iran's regional status is very powerful iran has very strong allies across the region and the americans have a presence across every region so they would be very vulnerable if there was any form of conflict ok so i don't think i don't take that sort of ok well maybe we're

and why it was taken by the united states were invaded in order for the united states to control pearl harbor because of hawaii's location its central central in the central pacific so there's a central location that ships could. enter point ports after disarming refurbish the following ports rearm and go back fighting. the middle middle world who are busy asian or impede my mighty greedy so it was by this very belief that they were present all the things it was how do you know you to be d.c. nine eleven and one third so what we see rising up out of that because people are these giant monsters that are asked to read the document of an existing. document he should basically say we're right this book you are worthy of note to the whole truth and the silly old fool once again and the pious see that from the newspapers that received being. cut. that we've developed an unusual. view of the world because of our location we have huge oceans and a couple of weak neighbors in mexico and canada therefore we've never had to have a foreign policy of clear cooperation with others we've been able be

today we officially opened the united states embassy in jerusalem. congratulations. it's been a long time coming. almost immediately after declaring stated in 1948, israel designated the city of jerusalem as its capital, the capital of the jewish people established in ancient times. so important. today jerusalem is the seat of israel's government. it is the home of the israeli legislature and the israeli supreme court, and israel's prime minister and president. israel is a sovereign nation with rights like every other sovereign nation to determine its own capital. yet for many years we fail to acknowledge the obvious. the plane reality that israel's capital is jerusalem. on december 6, 2017, at my direction the united states finally and officially recognized jerusalem as the true capital of israel. today we followed through on this recognition and opened our embassy in the historic and sacred land of jerusalem. and we are opening it may mean many years ahead of schedule. as i said in december, our greatest hope is for peace. the united states remains fully committed t

with any future president of the united states who hopefully will be able to recover they'll be able to demonstrate that our political some system has come to its senses but it's going to be difficult now you mentioned before that on a number of strategic and important issues the obama administration and the putin administration despite the lack of very warm personal chemistry between the two leaders they were able to find some degree of compromise they could work together but obviously i think in moscow at least there is a sounds of missed opportunities what's interesting about donald trump is that so far he has been finding it very hard to find a strategic over life if he's adversaries but he found one geopolitical soul mate and this is israel's prime minister benjamin netanyahu. do you think the two are working in concert or do you think that policies are planned mutually planned and coordinated or is israel just being a portion a stick in following a perhaps orchestrating directing president presidents trying to leave so you know i think it's very difficult to work in concer

it was beneficial for the united states. that's i regret that over the last year, there has been attacks on that system. but still, the system of globalization shouldn't be described as international socialism. it's the opposite. it was spread of capitalistic institutions to message the world. china in integrating itself later into the international economic system, discarded some of the elements of socialistic economy. it's still a communist dictatorship, it has taken on elements of capitalisms. it's the opposite what you're describing. guest: i would respectfully disagree with that too. i empathize with this. the interesting thing about that, that number has declined. as bad as it is. that 24 hour news cycle that rhymes us -- reminds us. that trend has been made positive by globalization. for the reason that the four world war ii, only way a country can get ahead countries like soviet union or nazi german. he to take over other country and absorb resources to become more wealthy. we have a world system where you can get ah

united states is have the gold standard. good people at the fda and industry developed to ensure that we have high quality medicine. every pill, every time. we were effectively outsourcing the manufacturing of our medicine to countries that have few, if any standards. it is really remarkable. back in this. in 2007, some of you might remember news reports with that of the chinese or the equivalent of the fda and child were-- in china were taking bribes. they said we are in the very early stage of being able to manufacture high quality medicine. the market did not stop moving to a place where technology had very few standards we really remarkable transition. the other thing fascinating and again to your point about the lack of transparency, it turns out we have a trade deficit for china and pharmaceuticals. at least of the 2014. and i've never seen a public official united states acknowledged we have a trade deficit and pharmaceuticals. maybe it is there and i would love to see it. if you caught a glimpse of it, please send it

, always a president of the united states. this is the first time that had happened. once victoria did that, the rest of the world that, looking at the way queen victoria treated him. steve: how do we know about that meeting? how was the queen? prof. semmes: they had a dinner, grant and his wife were there, in their youngest son, jesse, was there as well, but he was not invited to dinner with the queen. he was supposed to have dinner with the house ladies. point to some sources, mrs. grant -- according to some sources, mrs. grant is upset or she thinks the staff means staff, but it means lower royals. she presses to invite him to dinner. grant, queen victoria writes in her diary that he was "an agreeable american in that american way," and i'm not quite sure what she means by that, but she came to enjoy dinner with him, but she did not have a high opinion of grant's wife, because of the way she noted on jesse. lord derby, who had set up the meeting, refer to grant of having the intelligence and the manners of a bulldog. i thin

as we speak are benefiting from seemingly warming ties between the united states and north korea ok we're going to get some live pictures from andrews as we talk here how important is this release in the run up to that summit between donald trump and kim jong il and. well it's certainly seen as a sign of goodwill from north korea that they want this potential summit to go well and it really has lowered it it's a way of lowering tensions ahead of any possible talks now we know that this summit could it take place as soon as the end of this month or in early june we also heard the president say earlier today that it would not take place in the demilitarized zone which leads many to believe that it could be happening in singapore for trump this is a huge victory he sees this as a thanks to his campaign of maximum pressure to bring kim jong un to the negotiating table but other more cautious observers look at it and say look it's too soon to say what is actually going to be accomplished the issue was never that north korea would not be willing to meet with a sitting u.s. president it

and what it was taken by the united states were invaded in order for the united states to control pearl harbor because of hawaii's location its central central in the central pacific so there's a central location that ships. could enter point ports after disarming refurbish. ports rearm and go back fighting. a little bit of the world who are busy asian or in peace and quiet mighty greedy sort of scientists very relieved that they were present all the things it was happy it will be to be d.c. nine eleven and nine third's to what we see rising up out of that because people are these giant monsters that are jewelry. documents instead of an exhibit. documenting each and basically saying we're to write this book we are worthy to know the whole truth and you see so it's all still up again and piracy from the newspapers that proceed. we've developed an unusual. view of the world because of our location we have huge oceans and a couple of week neighbors in mexico and canada therefore we've never had to have a foreign policy of clear cooperation with others we've been able because of our power t

precipitant there are actions by the united states green lines green lights from the united states the whole history of us is regular relations shows that is the united states ultimately that is the decision maker here and this position towards iran has been preached by sections of the u.s. administration for decades now and you know a video is u.s. presidents have known. all sorts of plans to to destabilize iran to attack iran and so on as well for for. the last few years they have used openly terrorist groups. so-called fundamental as groups to massacre of. people in syria and iraq and so on i'm fucked off not going to see it was to unsettle iran with new military bases and to have to attack here. in public knowledge for decades and. some if we if we look at it in context if this is the u.s. but it is only one country of the you know the original members of this agreement so we still have u.k. france germany the e.u. countries are in support the e.u. foreign policy chief still supports the old deal russia and china will await their their comments but they certainly haven't spoken out

let's have a great north america, canada, united states and mexico. number two, the challenges and threats of security and safety. we've been by the side of this nation working every day, every year on security and safety issues. we do exercises, be practicing exercises in the gulf of mexico and the pacific with the u.s. marines and the mexican marines. every year we do that, even four times a year, and we work, invest like we don't do in many other things, in mexico to prevent drugs to reaching this nation, because mexico doesn't produce drugs. doesn't consume drugs significantly. we're doing the good job trying to be a good neighbor and partner for the u.s. young, and we get 80,000 kids dying every year. here in the united states people says what's wrong with mexicans? what's happening with them? well, why are they killing each other? are they drink too much tequila? no, we're working to prevent drugs reaching this nation, and what is happening here that you're legalizing consumption? so we pay the price of 80,000 kids dying every year and you legal

january twelfth i repeated these conditions i made clear that if the deal could not be fixed the united states would no longer be a party to the agreement over the past few months we have engaged extensively with our allies and partners around the world including france germany and the united kingdom we have also consulted with our friends from across the middle east we are unified in our understanding of the threat and in our conviction that iran must never acquire a nuclear weapon after these consultations it is clear to me that we cannot prevent an iranian nuclear bomb on to the decaying and rotten structure of the current agreement the iran deal is defective at its core if we do nothing we know exactly what will happen in just a short period of time the world's leading state sponsor of terror will be on the cusp of acquiring the world's most dangerous weapons therefore i am announcing today that the united states will withdraw from the iran nuclear deal in a few moments i will sign a presidential memorandum to begin reinstating u.s. nuclear sanctions on the uranian regime. we will be insti

i made clear that if the deal could not be fixed, the united states would no longer be a party to the agreement. over the past few months, we have engaged extensively with our allies and partners around the world, including france, germany and the united kingdom. we have also consulted with our friends from across the middle east. we are unified in our understanding of the threat and in our conviction that iran must never acquire a nuclear weapon. after these consultations, it is clear to me that we cannot prevent an iranian nuclear bomb under the decaying and the rotten structure of the current agreement. the iran deal is defective at its core. if we do nothing, we know exactly what will happen. in a short period of time the world's state sponsor of terror will be on the cusp of acquiring the world's most dangerous weapons. therefore, i am announcing today that the united states will withdraw from the iran nuclear deal. in a few moments, i will sign a presidential memorandum to begin reinstating u.s. nuclear sanctions on the iranian regime. we will be instituting the highest level of

so the fda banned 29 different products from coming into united states, but because the united states is a so dependence the fda had to exempt 14 of those products from its own band and some of those products included antibiotics or ingredients for antibiotics and ingredients for chemotherapy because the fda was concerned about drug shortages here in the united states. that's how dependent we are on the country. there was a fascinating story about the availability after the anthrax attacks took some of you might remember in washington and new york so the us military needed to buy a whole lot. they went to a very reputable country in europe. this was reported in bloomberg and in the course of writing the book i spoke to the ceo of the company and he said yes, we had to get the starting material from china. think of it, the us military needed this drug after the anthrax attack in the starting material was obtained from china. if someone from the industry-- as a someone from the industry said what if china is the anthrax attacker? our medicine can be used as a strategic weapon. there are

the united states in afghanistan which is ironic after what the united states to the soviets in afghanistan and it looked like there was going to be some more positive relations between our countries but then nato started to expand and when in two thousand and eight george bush announced that nato was good expand to ukraine and georgia that was i think past the red line for russia and russia reacted to that point so what you've seen since then in ukraine and in syria and in the baltic cities to europe is these areas that were actual confrontation and hostilities could erupt the u.s. state department a few years ago admitted to spending over five billion dollars on the my down coup of the ukraine crew that was blamed on a russian invasion the day after the coup you had victoria nuland john mccain handing out sandwiches on my down square and yet all the blame in the western media said russia invaded ukraine now the u.s. state department admitted to spending five billion and i'd just like to add as well just from a side point if russia did militarily invade ukraine you would be able to film it

or united states of america illegally overthrew him with no hope of the of the united states maintain that paul or despite having no mule already that's where we're headed military history when i said military the threat of force violent sprouse weapons what you how else are they maintaining power in vikki climbed on the world and where population we just talked about how many guest fania two hours and in traffic we're all americans are waiting to hear was. but yours. we are the evidence. but the nationalisation where the evidence of the war crimes we're not the war crimes ourselves. what already is an independent country all that was overthrown in eighty ninety three was our government by the united states not our country so our country is still an independent state but we're not a control of our independence we're occupying. this book overthrow is in attempt to show the times that america overthrew foreign governments over a long period. the united states at least in a relative sense is declining in power in the world and we can still remain and i believe will still remain a potent

right as you pointed out here in the united states particularly in the mainstream news media don't want to give credit to president trump. as jenny pointed out important thing is that the statement you know criticizing john bolton or even canceling the summit meeting came from directly from. from counterpart diploma you know john bolton in the past and. so on so it's kind of individual statements highlight that the north korean government officially still is very much interested in the coming summit meeting with the president trump i think if that's the case ok jenny what do you think the first steps are going to be because unfortunately. maybe this is because of the bolton affected and just the perceptions of north korea in general you know what the end result is a nuclear free peninsula i think that's the ultimate goal but that's going to take a long time to get there stationing of american troops in the south so far the north has not really put a whole lot of demands on that but we know that that will probably be part of the process as well i mean what we know is some of this coming

against syrian military units when they've come as the united states has to close but again that is that is quite a ways away and it's difficult to imagine the. syrian military units in the midst of an offensive against isis so far away from any assets that the united states their partners might have in the ground all right we know it's a confusing situation and we appreciate your unique insight you've been there on the ground and you can help us kind of wrap our minds around. we know that as it develops you'll help us stay across and thanks for being with us our senior correspondent. let's now go live to brian the director of the antiwar answer coalition. thanks for being with us here on r.t. international. so the pentagon has not confirmed the attack as of yet and we were just discussing that with our correspondent here in the studio what does that suggest to you. i don't think it suggests much right now of course we don't know if the united states in fact did this they have done it in the past they are i give the eastern and northeastern part of syria east of the euphrates the

today, we officially opened the united states embassy in jerusalem. congratulations. as been a long time coming. almost, immediately after declaring a state, israel designated the city of jerusalem as their capital. the capital of the jewish people establish an engine times. -- in ancient times. today, israel is the seat of the truce government. the israeli supreme court, israel's prime minister, and permanent -- president. israel is a nation with a right like any other sovereign nation to determine its own capital. yet, for many years, we fail to acknowledge the obvious. the plane reality that israel's capital is jerusalem. 2016, the united states, officially recognize jerusalem is a true capital of israel. today, we follow through on this recognition and open our embassy in a historic and sacred land of jerusalem and we are opening it many years ahead of schedule. as i've said in december, our greatest hope is for peace. the united states remains fully committed to facilitating a lasting peace agreement and we continue to support the status quo is true some holy site

or between the united states and other countries in the way that would be.

or against the united states it's clear that the united states wants to be so strong that they would be able to carry out the first strike against russia with impunity or to be able to threaten russia with this the strike that's why the president putin in his latest speech to the national assembly. he unveiled the these new weapons that there are very few of them and they aim of them is dissuasion you know russia doesn't want to dominate the united states we just want to be able to strike it with i don't know three or four new sales of that would stop the united states from threatening russia or from starting a war which would be a disaster for the whole world well nato has been complaining for a while that russian submarines were trying to detect attack could telecommunications cables between you europe and the u.s. now let me bring in olivier guitar there's a lot of talk a lot of hype that we're going back to the cold war at least in rhetoric it sounds like it but what's the reality. i think it's it's. much better in terms of what you can see as a peaceful environment because i thi

this this country, a repository which watches the testing of all of the economic models in the united states, if you talk to legislators and governors and people involved in state politics, they do not have any idea about the repository for the rest of the nation, in this book, we brought it all together. if something can be done, it probably has been done, it was done in idaho in 1964 or maine in 1963, we have a beautiful repository of informs, let me, if i can, in the first chapter of the book, i titled it, the fall from grace, there are 11 states in the united states that have introduced the income tax since 1960. these are not weird states. the first was west virginia in 1961, the last was connecticut, under lowell, a republican, a yalie, it includes maine and rhode island and neb -- nebraska, we took the day and the year in which they introduced income tax and we look at all of the 11 straights and what happened to them in the three years prior to introducing the income tax. they all did it in dump years, we looked at the primary metrics of the states relative to the rest of the nation,

the real issue here is this isolates the united states. this takes something that might have possibly taken place 15 years from now and puts it into tomorrow. it moves the crisis time. it creates confrontation. it's lates t-- it isolates the states. if we had to go to war with iran, do you think europe is going to be with us? do you think these other countries are going to support us at the united nations? i think what the president's done is isolate us, make it much more difficult. let me give you an example. if your house was on fire today, would you not put out the fire because you're afraid it might light on fire again in 14 years? of course not. that's what the president's done. the president has lit the fire today. we'll see what happens. >> he announced -- >> this has to be the last question. i told them i only had five minutes. >> he announced today that his brand new secretary of state is about to land in north korea to engage in talks about that country's nuclear program. do you believe that the actions he took today in unilateral

trump president of the united states of america thank you mr chairman thank you sir that was the u.s. secretary of state speaking a short time ago let's get more reaction now to this canceled summit we have the view from the korean peninsula and from the united states richardson is standing by in washington and josh smith is joining us from seoul and clare i'd like to begin with you because we just heard the secretary of state cite there in that letter open hostility and anger what was trump referring to there and why cancel the summit now. it seems that he's referring to some comments that were made by the north koreans which in turn seem to have been prompted by things said by vice president mike pence he was referring to the libya model when it came to dealing with north korea and that of course would be seen by the north koreans as the incident in which wal-mart get off the agreed under george bush's administration to give up his nuclear weapons program and then during the arab spring uprisings we saw that he was brutally murdered by his own people and we talk about the libya mode

>> we would encourage united states to come forward with the details at their own convenience. >> madam deputy speaker i wonder if the secretary of state can advise on the department of the success of a trade deal with the united states and whether it would punish companies conducting business in iran legitimately under international agreement. >> as i've said several times i think he will do what he can to protect the legitimate commercial timothy by uk businesses. >> is it the case that iaea inspectors are accessing key sites and if that is the case do you have any confidence at all that iran itself is honoring its commitment? >> the iaea told me that they were getting all the access that they needed and indeed might pompeo the head of u.s. intelligence, they have all confirmed that iran is now in compliance with jcpoa. >> thank you mr. speaker. we have no difficulty with president trump working with our allies on a real comprehensive and lasting solution to the iranian threat and how does the u.s. propose to achieve a? what's just uses the foreign secretary have for the president? >>

well there were indications north korea and united states and fundamental differences when it came tohow the vision that the nuclear efficient process there's been a lot of talk about how i you know is toots might want to duplicate dissolute libya model in dismantling the nuclear program in north korea which meant the north korea will have to meet significant concessions before there can be any kind of rewards and then we have seen and recently had no interest in going along with this when you were so i think if you're to has a lot of commentators here in south korea they would tell you that the u.s. government might simply have come to the religious and that they just don't have enough time before this single or summit to clarify all the details work out all the differences so it might just be better to cancel it at this time and try to have another one scheduled in the near future mr mason donald trump has blamed north korea's hostile rhetoric for canceling the summit and american officials have also pointed out that north korean officials missed meetings to prepare for the summit t

the united states is a key. it's a key actor in the negotiation of a peace process the other thing to you is that you know it's very interesting to see the very skillful very adroit diplomacy that has been exercised by when jane but when jane and south korea is in a hard place because historically south korea has been semi sovereign that's because the united states to this day retains command authority over south korean military forces in times of war crisis the united states in violation of the terms of the armistice agreement still stations roughly thirty thousand u.s. military forces south of the d.m.z. operates about eighty military installations until it has basically conducted these joint military exercises with south korea that are the largest in the world that i'm simulate to the invasion and occupation of north korea that simulate the decapitation of north korea's leadership and that also as recently as just a couple of weeks ago in this operation max thunder simulate operations that in. a potential nuc

prc, the chinese had replaced the soviet seen for a while as being as the most hostile to the united states. ultimately, until the late 1980's, the soviet union was the overriding enemy from the united lates from 1945 with the 1940's until the in of the cold war and gorbachev. host: the next caller is from michigan, ron, go ahead. they can for waiting period -- .hank you for waiting perio caller: i turned down my deferment and i volunteered to go to vietnam. to thented to send me preparatory school, but i had to go to vietnam, i had to work against the war. workers, i rights had to have a gun and bomb the funds go to work against this government. while it was in transit to my station, i read bernard falls autobiography, ho chi minh i learned my father who spent three years in the pacific, alcohol helped my father -- that war. were by identity to the vietnamese -- i had a debt to pay for the vietnamese to help my father's day life. the biggest piece march was held at the beach at july. there was a frightening incident and my base and i reported it, and a year later, there was a fracking a we

prc, the chinese had replaced the soviet seen for a while as being as the most hostile to the united states. ultimately, until the late 1980's, the soviet union was the overriding enemy from the united lates from 1945 with the 1940's until the in of the cold war and gorbachev. host: the next caller is from michigan, ron, go ahead. they can for waiting period -- .hank you for waiting perio caller: i turned down my deferment and i volunteered to go to vietnam. to thented to send me preparatory school, but i had to go to vietnam, i had to work against the war. workers, i rights had to have a gun and bomb the funds go to work against this government. while it was in transit to my station, i read bernard falls autobiography, ho chi minh i learned my father who spent three years in the pacific, alcohol helped my father -- that war. were by identity to the vietnamese -- i had a debt to pay for the vietnamese to help my father's day life. the biggest piece march was held at the beach at july. there was a frightening incident and my base and i reported it, and a year later, there was a fracking a we

on the united states. i'm sure she will continue that. when the president makes his president makes his visit in july and i trust you will communicate that to the rest of the labor benches adding she made a very good point when she said today the iranian government and people have not walked away from the steel. they remain in compliance and it is our duty as a uk government and with our european partners to help them to remain in compliance and to indeed assist in the survival. i think to be fair to the u.s. administration they had decided that there is another way forward they decided that the problems that they see in the deal. the problem of the iranian acquisition. they decided this could be met by bringing all the problems together and having a negotiation. we have a different view. has long since taken a different view. it was to come part meant lies the nuclear deal and the in the present has taken in other views. to come forward with concrete proposals about how exactly they intend to bring those problems together and to address

and why it was taken by the united states were invaded in order for the united states to control pearl harbor because of hawaii's location its central central in the central pacific so there's a central location that ships. enter point ports after disarming refurbish the following ports rearm and go back fighting. the middle middle of the asian or impede my mighty greedy sword it was by this very belated resents all the things it was happier for you to be d.c. nine eleven and one third so what we see rising up out of that because the people who are the least. bit monsters that are asked to read. documents of an exhibit. documenting each should basically say to write this book you are worthy to know the whole truth and you see so it's all still up again and the piracy from the newspapers that received. the wave developed an unusual. view of the world because of our location we have huge oceans and a couple of weeks neighbors in mexico and canada therefore we've never had to have a foreign policy of clear co-operation with others we've been able because of our power to impose our will on

or united states of america illegally overthrew him where he is now home of the of the united states maintain that paul or despite having no mule already that's just her military and why do you hear what i said military the threat of force violent sprouse weapons what you how else are they maintaining power vikki climbed on the world and their population we just talked about how many guess fania two hours and in traffic we're all americans are way behind was. it's yours. we are the evidence. that the nationalisation where the evidence of the war crime we're not the war crimes ourselves. what already is an independent country all that was overthrown and eighty ninety three was our government by the united states not our country so our country is still an independent state but we're not a control of our independence we're occupying. this book overthrow is an attempt to show the times that america overthrew foreign governments over a long period. the united states at least in a relative sense is declining in power in the world and we can still remain and i believe will still remain a po

always gets in the way of everything but if trump of the united states can't support koreans making peace then we need to stay out of a completely agree that i think this is what again the mainstream media can't get their head around that it's about the korean people north and south first in foremost ok and then the us is the interloper here jenny you want to also react go ahead jump in well i mean i'm not sure i necessarily agree with that completely ok because the us does play a big role here because the north koreans believe the u.s. plays a big role here and so yes there has been movement on into korean relations but at the end of the day the north koreans don't look to start korea to really solve the security issues because the enemy still really is the united states and that is sort of the core of their identity and of course of their worries i wanted to piggyback on the professor's comments as well to say that you know i think there is a problem here and the problem is with the consistency of messaging and in an active negotiation process you can't have these competing narratives y

united states has always had a tool to use and its tax on other country's. economic sanctions are are often just the beginning another thing you like to do is play some military pressure on the countries and turn talking about. and they're asked to be an effort to demonize that country and the leader of that country. we have a responsibility for the home. and we need to make rules for the rest. because without us there we can. apply to many clubs over the years so i know the game inside guides. football isn't only about what happens on the pitch to the final school it's about the passion from the fans it's the age of the shaper money kill you narrowness and spending shouldn't twenty million one ply a. book it's an experience like nothing else not to because i want to share what i think what i know about the beautiful game played great so what more chance with. that makes it's going to. in some american cities the police have built themselves cling to refutation of people who walk on the streets of the united states who are at risk from the very people who ar

question right now is whether your of can really take it for granted that the united states will not lash out at europe economically do you think this rat of secondary sanctions is real do you think the united states good. full force against european countries if they decide to continue trading with iran provided of course if iran is in compliance with the. so the threat of secondary sanctions is very rule real basically this idea that you know if you're a non us company you've got to choose do you want to do business with iran or do you want to do business with the united states and for most companies that's going to be an easy choice and for most companies the threat is sufficient the u.s. doesn't really have to do much in force mint in order to get a lot of big companies to say you know what this isn't worth the risk but european governments do have tools available to them to seek to counter the secondary sanctions threat and that's the question i think that's going to be on the table when europe negotiates with iran with russia with china with the remaining participants in the g

there was an interesting anecdote that prior to his visit, a united states manager and his counterpart in great britain were discussing how should the queen receive him, should he just considered a private citizen? one argued no, he should be treated as a head of state or his counterpart in great britain said no, he is is a private citizen, that's how your country works. he is not an ax ruler. ex-ruler. derby,t says to lord you treated napoleon this way, you should treat friends the same way, and are recessed once says once an emperor, always an emperor, and pierpont says once a president are the united states, always a president of the united states. this is the first time that had happened. once victoria did that, the rest of the world that, looking at the way queen victoria treated him. steve: how do we know about that meeting? how was the queen? ,rof. semmes: they had a dinner grant and his wife were there, in their youngest son, jesse, was there as well, but he was not invited to dinner with the queen. he was supposed to have dinner with the house ladies. point to some sources, mr

right as you pointed out here in the united states particularly in the mainstream media don't want to give credit to president trump they're simply a case. as any pointed out important thing is that the statement you know criticizing john bolton or even canceling the summit meeting came from directly from. from counterpart diploma you know john bolton in the past. so that's that's kind of individual statement highlighted that the north korean government officially still is very much interested in the coming summit meeting with the president i think that's the case ok jenny what do you think that the first steps are going to be because unfortunately and maybe this is because of the bolton affected and just the perceptions of north korea in general you know the end result is a nuclear free peninsula i think that's the oil to make goal but that's going to take a long time to get there stationing of american troops in the south so far the north has not really put a whole lot of demands on that but we know that that will probably be part of the process as well i mean what we know is some o