interlinked with the united states and united states. should change they are metion that they cannot. support the coup at counters that by providing. allegation you. unites its debts should be a result united states result that you should be greece united not ikea's together with the clinton administration and also united states also all the problems with spain you know that spain also laws non-sport not buy and use if they will to let them sent the freshest the us if i don't i don't mean to interrupt it's just that i'm going to come back to some of this in a bit i want to get a question in to fabrice there for bruce i want to try to take a step back for a moment could you explain to our viewers what exactly the s. 400 system does and why it causes this level of concern right now. well basically it brings a highly sophisticated russian refinery system into turkey's territorial defense and the problem here is that since 2010 nato is building a nato wide and timi size system must be reliant on an american battery out systems . and then the

today is an important victory for the united states constitution. today president donald trump delivered on one of the central promises he made to the american people, to nominate principled constitutionalists to the supreme court. today the republican majority in the united states senate delivered on one of the principal promises we made to the american people, to confirm the principled constitutionalists to the supreme court. to everyone who values and cherishes the constitution and the bill of rights, today was an important milestone. to everyone who wants to see the rights of free speech and to engage without censorship and without the government silencing you, today was an important victory. to everyone who cherishes religious liberty, the first liberty protected and the first clause in the bill of rights, the right to live according to your faith and conscience without the government getting in the way, today was an important victory. everyone who values the right to keep and bear arms and protect your home and your family and your life, today

and here in the united states the united states has to work both within our country and also with other countries to bring it to a close hopefully with the arrival of it back seen if that happens in 2021 and the dispersal and distribution of that vaccine around the world and around the united states trying to climb out of the global recession that has been so injurious to so many americans whoever's elected and i hope is going to be vice president biden is going to have perhaps the most difficult global agenda that any president has faced since the 1930 s. global a national agenda i should say since franklin up wrote eleanor roosevelt was elected in 1932 but joe biden's up to it and he's going to have a lot of support in the country to be an activist president who tries to heal the country and unite has to combat these these major concerns how do you make that case to americans that feel that they fought in iraq they fought in afghanistan they fought in korea they fought in vietnam you know generations of military families who feel after financial crises and you know sort of tough times

i think it's in the best interest of the united states, and the world as a whole that the united states negotiate rather than go back to the cold-war relationship with the soviet union. i don't look at the picture as bleakly as you have indicated in your question, mr. trewhitt. i believe that the united states has had many successes in recent years, in recent months, as far as the communist movement is concerned. we have been successful in portugal, where a year ago it looked like there was a very great possibility that the communists would take over in portugal. it didn't happen. we have a democracy in portugal today. a few months ago, or i should say, maybe two years ago, the soviet union looked like they had continued strength in the middle east. today, according to prime minister rabin, the soviet union is weaker in the middle east than they have been in many, many years. the facts are, there -- the soviet union relationship with egypt is at a low level. the soviet union relationship with syria is at a very low point. the united states today, according to prime minister rabin of isr

if the united states can band together with other allied partners to affirm and advance an open world states like russia and china will not be able to wish the 24th century would have. and finally you have states like india. i think they are you're going too see their choices very much depending where the work falls diplomatically. this is india, china is pushing it away from china. supplies were intergenic diplomacy is seriously and within an openness coalition are going to be really important. in all of these cases choices in november fairly stark. they met working at ways at odds with international openness and to adopt a strategy and many ways it should if it's serious about competing with china. may be tempted for openness pool also help with the crises at home. >> let's head to one point about rebecca's act excellent answer. and that is to note well rebecca's absolutely right that we see it many ways divided in the openness enclosure, the charge to even have to choose does provide some may have not had to confront for the last four years but that is to say when it's relatively m

for five weeks, as korean republican and united states forces under the united nations flag fought to stem the tide of north korean communist aggression, while the security council took emergency steps in an effort to halt that aggression, a delegate of the soviet union exempted himself from deliberations and decisions. with the heroic help of the republican fighting forces, the united nations troops fought and fell back, trading space for time until more help could arrive. on august 1, a soviet delegate, for the first time since the invasion, returned to take his seat in the security council. it was the turn of the soviet to preside. he deliberately ignored the north korean communist aggression and began a systematic campaign as president to block any action on the korean war by the security council. the united nations troops battled the soviet armed communist invaders. the security council tried without success to prod the soviet delegate to his responsibility. as august day followed august day, the united nations continued its fight in korea. on the security council, the soviet del

the time has come for honest government in the united states of america.tonight i do not promise the millennial yum in the morning i do not promise we can eliminate discrimination and eliminate all dangers of war in the space of fourer even eight years but i promise action, a new policy tour peace abroad, a new policy for peace and justice at home. look at our problems abroad. do you realize that we face the stark truth that we are worse off in every area of the world tonight than we were when president eisenhower left office eight years ago? that's the record. and there is only one answer to such a record of failure, and that is a complete housecleaning of those responsible for the failures and that record. the answer is the complete reappraisal of america's policies in every section of the world. we shall begin with vietnam. we all hope in this room that there is a chance that current negotiations may bring an honorable end to that war. and we will say nothing during this campaign that might destroy that chance. but if the war is not ended when the peopl

if ireland rose up against the british empire and the united states had signed this, would the united states have any commitment? external aggression. maybe not. okay? but i want you to look at this. this is a extremely controversial part of the versailles peace treaty. it's the shantung. controversy. it's spelled a couple different ways. shantung had been an area of china which germany had taken over in 1898. and when took over it applied the doctrine of xernlt. if a german businessman raped and murder aid chinese woman the chinese police couldn't touch him. only german police operating there could touch him. well, when world war i began japan was an ally of great britain. so japan declared war on germany, occupied a bunch of german possessions in the pacific and then took over the shantung peninsula and then at the versailles peace conference woodrow wilson realized for a couple reasons he needed japan's support for the treaty sew said to the japanese what's it going to take? and the japanese had a great idea. they said we want one small little thing. we want racial equality clause

is the united states hasn't lived up to that goal. forts around the world to redefine how to do competition, to include a regulatory on approach with leadership from united her places the kingdom, australia, germany, and france. the united states very much to catch up with all of them. globally ave a negotiated way to do competition policy. we've never had that but we can have a globally convergent way to o competition policy and have that happen. it can't just be left to the competition authorities. that the finance ministers and economic leaders and the national economic involved in to be negotiating. i'll conclude, i think you have enormous opportunity. there is a sense of crisis that to be ng really needs done, but there is enough time and space to do something not run but about rt our bigger structural problems. united d needs the states. the united states can't succeed without the world, and these are tangible steps that can be taken in that rebuilding process. so much, jason, for someone like you, to so a case tely put forward f

and in a sense, creating a bit of a constitutional clash with the president of the united states. it's a moving peace and those are all very prominent senators. i knew several of them and worked with them. they look much younger in these pictures. but they're really earnest about what they're saying and they were very convincing to the television audience that -- they had to fight to get that television program in the first place. and so they made the most of it. >> article 1, section 8 of the constitution reads as follows, the congress shall have power to raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years. >> our amendment to end the war fulfills the obligations that we have under the constitution. >> mcgovern/hatfield amendment, who were they and what would this really have done if it passed? >> to back up just a little bit, the president of the united states, richard nixon, had announced in november of 1969 of the program to remove american troops from vietnam. and the thought at that point was, maybe this was the end o

in a sense, creating a bit of a constitutional clash, with the president of the united states. it's a very moving piece. and there's a lot of prominence, i knew several of them, i worked with them, and they look much younger in these pictures. but they really are earn just about what they're saying, they are very convincing to the television audience that watch them. i had to watch to get that television program in the first place. so they made their most of it. >> article one, section eight of the constitution reads as follows. congress shall have power to raise and support armies. but no appropriation of money to that use shelby for a longer term, and then two years. >> our amendment to end the war fulfills the obligations that we have under the constitution. >> mick govern had fueled the summit meant, sometimes referred to who were they unaware -- what this really have done if it past? >> to back up just a little bit. the president of the united states, richard nixon, had announced in november of 1969 the vietnamization program to remove american troops from vietnam. and the

presidents were united in their total opposition to isolation for america and in their belief of the united statesn the interest of world peace require that america be strong enough and intelligent enough to assume the responsibilities of leadership in the world. they were united in the conviction that the united states should have a defense second to none in the world. they were all men who hated war and were dedicated to peace, but not one of these five sxhen no president in our history believed that america should ask an enemy for peace on terms that would betray allies and destroy help for the united states all over the world. [ applause ] and as your president i pledge that i shall always uphold that proud bipartisan tradition. standing in this convention hall four years ago, i pledged to seek an honorable end to the war in vietnam. more will be coming home. we have ended america's ground combat role. no draftees are being sent to vietnam. we have reduced our casualties by 98%. we've gone the extra mile. in pafact, we've gone tens of thousands of miles to seek a negotiation in the war and we

we have taken the initiative and the united states is trusted by the frontline nations and the united states is trusted by the other elements in southern africa. united states policy has been one of progress and success and i believe rather than talking about soviet progress we can talk about american successes. may i make an observation? i don't believe it is in the best interest of the united states to have a communist nation in nato. has indicated he would look with sympathy at a communist government in nato. . am totally opposed to it gov. carter: i have never advocated for a communist government and nato. i believe this is an instance for deliberate distortion and this has occurred also for the defense. i would never advocate any cut in the defense budget. mr. ford has made a political football out of the defense budget. about year ago he cut the into after he fired james's lessons are, the political heat got so great he added that $3 billion. when ronald reagan dubya with the texas primary election, he added another $1.5 billion. 's own office of management and budget testified

bill less save but openness does not describe all the goals goals the united state seeks to achieve there some limits upon us and of course it does not mean that china or other states can't have influence. it's a construct by which we hope to govern international 0 order and expect we have to live alongside authoritarian powers who do not share our preferences. >> you stressed at the start there can't be a return to the status quo either prethe trump administration or back to what people imagine at least to be the heyday of post cold war american primacy. the thing i found hard nest policymaking which is the business of choices, is what do you not do? so, or not do as much of what you used to think you do could do and examples of the middle east where we got infat waited with our own imagine fall thinken and we overreached. hough would this strategy you both laid out differ from past american grand strategies. what would the u.s. do differently, what we not do as much of as we did in the first 20 years after the end of the cold war? >> that's such an important question and you're ri

the united states even more -- the u.s. government even more eager to assert -- to establish stability in the region. when there was so much turmoil in europe, it became even more desirable to try to impose state -- what americans considered stable governments in the countries of central america and the caribbean. when the election of 1916 occurred, and wilson said that he wanted to keep the united states out of war, of course there were u.s. troops in haiti, in the dominican republic, and in nicaragua. he didn't need -- the united states didn't need to intervene in every country in the caribbean and central america. in a way, it's a little bit like lynching. you don't need to lynch everybody. you lynch some people and that is the lesson that people learn. it is very possible to intimidate. in 1919, wilson, despite his rhetoric he was saying in that moment in versailles crushed results in the dominican republic and in haiti mercilessly. so i would say absolutely no turning point if you look at it from the vantage point of th

it isn't to trade with the united states but to raid the united states.s the u.s. ordered the closure of beijing's top port in houston is regulated uncovered theft. the doj followed up with a string of indictments and said many chinese embassies are in fact spy centers. [crowd boos] no president in our history of engagement with china communist china has done what president trump did which is to say the assumptions the united states has been operating on for a long time are wrong. maria: coming up, while the president understood the serious china threat to u.s. national security he was also battling another major threat from within, his political opponents were spreading lies about him colluding with russia but first, the playbook that brought us the greatest jobs market in american history. that is next. beat heartburn fast tums chewy bites beautiful. but when i started cobra kai, the lack of control over my business made me a little intense. but now i practice a different philosophy. quickbooks helps me get paid, manage cash flow, and run payroll. and n

now i serve in the united states senate is only the second black woman ever elected to the united statesenate. i serve on the senate intelligence committee or have been in regular receipt of classified information about threats to our nation and hot spots around the world. i've traveled the world. i have met with our soldiers in war zones. i think joe has asked me to serve with him because he knows that we share a purpose which is about lifting up the american people. after the four years we have seen them donald trump unifying our country around our common values and principles. >> susan: thank you, senator harris. neither president trump nor vice president biden has released the sort of detailed health information that's become the modern norm until the 2016 election. in recent days, president trump's doctors have given misleading answers or refused to answer basic questions about his health. my question to each of you in turn is is this information voters deserve to know? vice president pence, would you like to go first? >> vice president pence: susan, thank you. let me say on behalf

god bless all of you and god bless the united states of america! i am looking forward to kamala harris, next vice president of the united states! ♪ [soul instrumental music] ♪ ♪ ♪ music]mental ♪ [in the air tonight, phil collins] >> ♪ i can feel it coming in the air tonight, oh lord and i've been waiting for this moment for all my life, oh lord. can you feel it coming in the air tonight? oh lord, oh lord well, if you told me you were drowning, i would not lend a hand, ♪ ♪ ♪ my ♪oh my, my, strongerthing i have waited longer for love ♪ [speaking foreign language] ♪ baby,isten, oh, my my ♪ ♪ >> ♪ [speaking foreign language] ♪ oh, my my i waited all my life the time is just right stronger, only love ♪ [tropical reggae song] ♪ >> ♪ greatest foundation but we will survive in this world ,o matter what they do and no matter what they say againan rise through the mist tomorrow we are going to rise again have no fear, have no sorrow all at once you see the builder great confusion, the devil delusion no matter what game they play, we have something they can n

, the chabder in chief of the united states -- do the commander in chief of the united states.s is where we are today because of a failure of leadership by this administration. >> senator harris, we've seen changes in the, in the role of the united states in terms of global leadership are over the past four years. and, of course, times do change. what's your definition -- we've seen strength with china, of course, as the vice president mentioned. what is your definition of the role of american leadership in 2020? >> so, you know, joe -- i love talking with joe about a lot of these issues and, you know, joe, i think he said it quite well. he says, you know, foreign policy might sound complicated but really it's relationships. just think about it as relationships. so we know this in our personal/professional relationship are. you've got to keep your word to your friends. you've got to be loyal to your friends. people who have stood with you, you've got to stand with them. you've got to know who your adversaries are and keep them in check. but what we have seen with donald trump i

politicians -- you don't want the united states supreme court to turn into this. trust me. politicians get to vote their preferences under our democracy. judges do not. judges do not. and finally, unlike some of my colleagues, i don't think our founders intended the united states supreme court to become a mini congress. i don't think our founders intended members of the united states supreme court to try to rewrite our statutes, or the united states constitution, every other thursday to prosecute a social or an economic agenda that they can't get by the voters. and that goes on in america every day. we've reached the point where one single, solitary federal judge, in a limited venue, can enjoin a federal statute or an executive order of the president of united states for the entire country. and our founders never intended that. i want to close with two very short quotations, the first stated much more eloquently than i can, is justice curtis in 1857. you've probably read it. he was dissenting in the dred scott case. this is what judge curtis said. "when a strict interpretat

is now an apology united states. secondly the economic growth of the soviet union is greater than us is dollars adjusted from two to three times as great as this is a great effect on the underdeveloped world problems of low income and population density and inadequate resources a gallup poll taken in february. asked people in ten countries. which country they thought would be first in one hundred seventy. both scientifically and militarily. and a majority in every country except that it would be the soviet union by nine hundred seventy votes at the u.n. particularly the vote dealing with red china. saturday. we receive the support on the position that we had taken of only two african countries. liberia. more than a century in the other union of south africa which is not a popular country in africa. every other african country either abstain or voted against us. more countries voted against asia. on this issue than voted. on the neutralised resolution which we were so much opposed to same thing happened. the candidate

the united states senate. the united states senate is where there will be a decision on whether we put on the floor at dell that my brother cory booker from new jersey and i wrote called the justice and policing act. a bill that says like joe biden and i say we should ban chokehold and carotid holds because george floyd would be alive today if i were the case in the bill that says let's have a national registry for people who break the law because that is the right thing to do and we can't have folks get fired one place and not get hired someplace else. we need to have a national standard for excessive use of force because it's not right that in some places when their successive use of force the question asked is was a reasonable when we all know you can reason away just about anything. the more fair and just question to ask is what is necessary? we need to change the standard. those kinds of decisions if they get made from the white house and we will make them it also gets made in the senate. that rings me to

if the united states can do it, so can we. if the u.s. only threatens our allies and partners will look elsewhere. if we do not ban together and pool their resources, expertise and night, the united states will be ill-equipped for the future challenges. let me conclude where do we go from here. first, we need to rebuild the u.s. foreign polic foreign-polis such as the state department which suffered the loss of extraordinary talent over the past four years. restoring overseas confidence in the united states requires highly qualified to diplomats who conduct themselves in a reliable and transparent manner most relations with allies and partners. it won't be easy but it's absolutely necessary. alliances are a foundational bedrock for protecting the american people. we need partnerships that pull our and resources to counter russia and china and tackle problems we cannot solve alone. third, halting the decline of global freedom and democracy must be a critical objective to the u.s. foreign policy. driving vibrant democracies around the world

the president of the united states, the commander in chief of the united states. this is where we are today because of a failure of leadership by this administration. susan: senator harris, we have seen changes in the role of the united states in terms of global leadership over the past four years. and of course talks do change. what is your definition -- we have seen strains with china, as the vice president mentioned, and with our allies, in nato and elsewhere. what is your definition of the role of american leadership in 2020? sen. harris: i love talking with joe about a lot of these issues. i think joe said it quite well. he said foreign policy might sound complicated, but really it's relationships. just think about it as relationships. we know this in our personal and professional relationships. you've got to keep your word to your friends. you got to be loyal with your friends. people who stood with you, you've got to stand with them. got to know your adversaries are, and keep them in check. what we have seen with donald trump is that he has betrayed our fri

the united states can do that policy, all on its own. but it would work a whole lot better on this if the other countries are doing it so it is not partly undone by leakage and manufacturing your ships from the united states to other countries, hurting our economy and undoing some of what we wanted to do on climate change. that is the importance of the border adjustment that i talked about in my opening remarks and in creating a system where you don't have mutual cheerleading to get other countries on board, you also have a concrete incentive for other countries to get on board. of that, my maybe my trade colleagues here get nervous about it, i think should operate through trading. thank you. will keep this short because basically i agree with everything jason said. so, absolutely, climate change has got to be part of the agenda. a running theme in a memo i wrote was the need to invest in the future and the three types of investments i was thinking to ere children and infrastructure offending climate and technology, i had to choose two o

the jewish organizations in the united states and in britain said the jews have suffered more than any other group, ask they need special treatment -- and they need special treatment. the american state department and the united nations in the beginning said, no. the british said absolutely not. the j e ws will be treat thed like everyone else. well, the jews were treated like everyone else, and the suffering was intense. and finally in july, two months after the war was over, in july truman sends a fact-finding mission led by dean harrison, earl harrison at the university of pennsylvania, and he sends harrison who was not a zionist, was not a jew, sends him to camps. and harrison come cans back with a report -- comes back with a report, and he says we are treating the j e ws just as badly as the germans did except we're not exterminating them. truman reads this report and writes his letter immediately to eisenhower and says to eisenhower, you've got to take care of this. this is inhumane, this is impossible, this is un-american. and eisenhower, you know, goes to work. >> that's great.

then it is time for new leadership for the united states of america. cheers] [applause and cheers] thank you. my fellow americans, tonight i accept the challenge and the commitment to provide that new leadership for america. i ask you to a second accept it with me. let us accept this challenge, not as a grim duty, but as an exciting adventure and which we are polar village to help a great nation realize its destiny. let us begin by committing ourselves to the truth, to see it like it is until it like it is. to find the truth, to speak the truth, and to live the truth, that's what we will do. [applause and cheers] we've had enough of big promises and little action, the time has come for honest government in the united states of america. [applause and cheers] so tonight, i do not promise the millennium in the morning. i don't promise that we can eradicate poverty and and discrimination, eliminate all danger of war. but i do promise action, a new policy for people peace abroad, a new policy for peace and justice at home. look at our problems abroad. do yo

we are the united states of america. we are being laughed at. >> donald trump ran for office saying that other countries were laughing at us and they wouldn't laugh at us anymore. >> they are laughing at us. we don't know what we're doing. they are laughing at us because they think we're stupid. >> what we saw was actually the literal exhibit of what he was talking about. how did that happen? >> i think the world doesn't know what to make of us anymore. for the first time, we have actually become frightening for people. >> diplomats and experts have come to the same judgement. >> donald trump's affect on america's standing on the world has been nothing short of disastrous. >> donald trump introduced an element of brutality and vulgarity. this is not the way we are supposed to run decent democratic societies. >> we're in very big trouble. i'm terribly worried. i feel like we need to sort of find a bench, sit down, clear our head. remember who we are, how we got here. >> it wasn't so long ago that we were the world's great

probably the most colorful president in united states history. i say probably i think we can state almost objectively the most colorful president in u.s. history. a giant of a figure. he stood at 6'1". that is very tall for that day and age. six foot one skinny. bushy eyebrows. hair brushed high above a very large forehead, with piercing blue eyes. jackson was a hot tempered man. he was a bit stubborn. oftentimes a bit bullheaded. he had strong convictions. he knew when he was opposed to something, he stood up to that system. he has a few nicknames as well. he went by the name "old hickor y. " tough as old hickory wood. his second nickname -- you won't believe this #--sharp knife. who has a nickname like sharp knife? sharp knife? so what's andrew jackson's story? jackson was born in 1767 in north carolina. his parents died at a very early age. he was an orphan. no parental restraints. as a young boy, he got into brawls and fights. he was not all that interested in learning or reading. jackson was nine years old at the time of the american revoluti

but it turned out that the nazis had researchers go to the united states to study exactly how the united states had subjugated african-american. the nazis sent researchers to that forbades marriage across racial lines in the united states. out that there were 41 of the united states that had hard marriage across -- barred marriage across racial lines, not just black-and-white mama but also asian descent. they sent researchers to study how the united states had laws,ated with jim crow segregation in public facilities, they looked for all of the ways. all of the laws in the united states and jim crow and segregation as they went back to debate those laws as they were forming what would ultimately become their laws. i had no idea. that is how i ended up focusing in on these three places because idea of spoke to this hierarchy and creating these artificial boundaries and artificial rankings that would have such horrific -- for what the nazis did, obviously. host: i am sure many readers will be surprised about the parallels between the jim crow development of the nazi code. of course, the naz

the united states with a growing brown key military agreement with russia most recently from the ins but before that from the a.b.m. treaty and now as though they're planning with a group of the open skies agreement. and now you know it could be that the new start treaty has also put history so that one thing well the other thing which is over real terms on russia is the level of a bit true that is directed toward russia and not wrong ordinary from the tabloid press but from the very. highest levels of the us government it will be. the people who are in the executive branch with people who are in congress. and of course you have the media stoking those so when you have. the absence of any arms agreements a possible arms race developing process the sort of hostility yes then russia does view of britain and is obviously growing towards china now china also feels very threatened because it is gradually replacing the united states as the global they have enormous economic and financial power and never in history has one had your money quietly ceded its the role in the world to rising and

which means it's perching 11 pm the west coast of the united states americans are going to bed many won't even know about this until they wake up in the morning by then 8 the white house some time but again even if there is time in terms of the sort of immediate statements that are going to come out there is a lot of time when it comes to dealing with this in advance of the u.s. election complete fuel joe biden and now a new low joe biden campaign director and you're reading this news you're watching your television what do you thinking about the election campaign as it stands the moment you know i'm not saying that to take away from what happens at present donald trump but we all in election mode in the u.s. and i'm wondering if you have any insight. there's no question that this is just as tricky for the biden campaign as it is for the white house and the republican campaign but in a different way because how joe biden reacts to this is going to also be watched very closely if he looks as if he is the zing on upon this kicking a man when he's down even as the u.s. president i

we are going to have a new attorney general of the united states of america.eers and applause] i pledge to, that our new attorney-general will be directed by the president of united states to launch a war against organized crime in this country. [cheers and applause] i pledge to you that our new attorney general will be directed active and belligerent against the loan sharks and the number of people who rob the urban rack enter in our cities. i pledge to that. the new attorney general will open a new front against the filth peddlers and the narcotics peddlers that are corrupting the lives of the children of this country. because my friends, let this message come through clear from what i say tonight -- time is running out for the merchants of crime and corruption in american society. the wave of crime is not going to be the wave of the future in the united states of america we -- america. [cheers and applause] >> we shall reestablish freedom from fear in america so that america can take the lead in reestablishing freedom from fear in the world. and to those wh

and the first lady of the united states. this shows how important testing, tracing and quaranti quarantining and isolate is. the president does fall into a high risk of category. he's older and some what over weight. i don't know about any other preexisting conditions that he may or may not have. the important thing is he's in an age group that does have and risk for severe covid. so this is very concerning. >> we are showing picture of the key white house team going into marine one. they're sharing many debates and meetings and fundraisers during that time. none of them wore a mask and none of them social distancing. this is very concerning. this has been the issue all along. >> the cdc and dr. fauci, all said how important it is to wear a mask. the trump team has not done a good job or set an example. the number of people could be exposed of at-risk of contracting the virus is significant here. >> what are the next steps now? the cdc's guidelines quarantining for how long? >> the cdc's guidelines suggested anyone exposed t

well no doubt the united states will remain on a course of the united states 1st but at the same time that's how the united states have always acted but what changed is that suddenly alliances and longstanding commitments like with many like with europe seemed conditional they seemed transactional particularly when it came to nato that's also an undercurrent in the whole issue of the north stream pipeline which is hugely unpopular in europe as well donald trump clearly also wants to see germany take more liquid gas from the united states so there are economic interests behind that but what we would expect and could expect from joe biden because he's said so that he would revisit many policy areas foreign policy areas is that the whole strategic thinking in terms of alliances and on those said values would come back into the equation rather than playing political hardball which is something that europe despite everything is still getting to grips with so is germany actually let's go back to washington is there a sense in washington that president trump has also bill loss of trust betwe