and as a consequence of the united states not recognizing the claims of independence, that for the philippines that emilio aguinaldo had stated. so we are telling the story of these events that happened 125 years ago through portraiture. why do we make that decision to do it that way? well, that way we can make this history personal. we can understand the agency of different individuals in this history. i think the us public is perhaps more familiar with figures such as theodore roosevelt. you know, who was second in command of the roughriders, for example. and there's a whole mythology around him, right? or president william mckinley. but what we do in this exhibition is that we put those portraits in conversation with portraits of figures from cuba, from puerto rico, from guam, from the philippines, from hawaii. in order to complete that narrative, to complete the history, to present the different perspectives, and really to provide a panoramic outlook into these history. well, we do start with president mckinley. he's right here, 25th, president of the united states. why is he important to

the second point is that in the united states. basically, not only in the issue of the zionist regime, but in general, trust in the government has decreased drastically in the past years. poll now the surveys that have been done are different. i prefer to refer to the survey conducted by the pio center , which shows that in the past years, the trust in the us government itself has fallen below 20%, and this is a gap and a dichotomy. it shows seriousness in the political arena of the united states, but let's go back to the issue of the zionist regime. well, look at cutting off the internet from all media tools, using official officials. i do n't know. those 18, 19, 20,000 people who were killed in palestine are these people literature is actually all these discourse creation and efforts . as for the young generation in the united states, which is interesting, they used to call this generation the vator generation, that is, a generation that is politically very interested in the ups and downs, at least as much as a country like iran

, um, israel basically is a liability, and that it involves the united states in conflicts that are not intrinsic to united united states national security, i woulduh point out the uh, the persisting bad relationship with iran, uh, i, i've traveled to iran, i know people who have, and and uh, "the iranian people are very in many ways pro-american uh, but the persisting bad relationship is largely due to israel, which of course carries out covert actions, assassinates officials, and donald trump picked up on that by assassinating his own iranian senior officials, so i would say it's a it's a it's a deficit for us, uh, it presists in bad relations with syria, uh, it makes our our relationship with the muslim." world in general difficult, and it particularly makes it difficult in terms of the actual our world, the middle east, so i would go the other direction and say, we would be much better off without the so-called alliance, as the the congressional mouth pieces tend to call it, there is no alliance with israel, is alliance requires reciprocity. "there is no reciprocity with isr

intrinsic to united states national security. i would point out the the persisting bad relationship with iran. i i've traveled to iran, i know people who have and and the iranian people are very in many ways pro american. "but the persisting bad relationship is largely due to israel, which of course carries out covert actions, assassinates officials, and donald trump picked up on that by assassinating his own iranian senior officials, so i would say it's a, it's a deficit for us, it persists in bad relations with syria, it makes our our relationship with the muslim world in general difficult." and it particularly makes it difficult in terms of the actual our world, the middle east, so i would go the other direction and say, we would be much better off without this so-called alliance, as the the congressional mouth pieces tend to call it, there is no alliance with israel, is alliance requires reciprocity, there is no reciprocity with israels we're seeing right now. where biden is trying to get israel to nudge away from the mass ki

it shows the politics of the united states. but back to the issue of the zionist regime well, look, cutting off the internet , using all media tools, official officials , i don't know, someone is angry, someone is crying at the camera, isn't it, for example , those 18, 19, 20,000 people who were killed in palestine, these are all bad people. this literature , in fact, all these discourses and efforts are made for the young generation in the united states, which is interesting , they sometimes call this generation the "what over generation", that is , a generation that politically has a lot of ups and downs , at least as much as the country. like iran, they are very busy now, basically, in the field what is happening in politics, they have nothing to do, you can see what borders violence, conflict and injustice have crossed, that the generation in the united states who once did not care much about politics, as they say , do not care now and in one of the issues of foreign policy, now this i would like to add rome's point in pare

to allow them to wait in the united states while their case or timing is desirable. they don't want that. they want people ex, illuminated from the united states until such time as they can establish their claim. and some people don't even want ben say it'd be able to ever establish of asylum. right. so that's the sort of comparative big spring. and then i think you're hearing opposition. uh, that's of the other end, which is look, if we just couldn't get people in the as quickly as possible and process them then that the solution of the problem. well, that's the solution to the problems of back blogs, but it's not the solution to the problem. uh, are you trying to have immigration? kurt pale did something number, and so that's it just depends what problem you're trying to solve for. rebecca, it seems that the 5 the ministration is currently focusing on the to terrance solution, or was it considered as to be the solution we've just had such as a blinking in mexico, requesting mexico do more to stop people which in the us mexico border. what do you make of that? well,

way that israel could do what it is doing without help and approval of the united states? absolutely not. first of all, it is not only the approval. we've seen the americans supporting the israelis by sending 45000 bombs. today the pentagon approved of sending 14 tanks from the strategic warehouse. they are direct participant to the genocide. secondly, the american from the one, to israel and said, i am not here representing this government, i am here as a jew, like if was a religious one which indic theopic level of this narrative, it is a conflict that has been going on for the last 75 years about the right of land of territory, it is not about the religion. thirdly, joe biden, when he arrived to the us, he had a press conference saying, you have the... legitimacy and the right to do what you are going to do, so he gave him the full authority to benjamin netanyahu to do what he's wanting to do, and the last point here i would like to point out is prime minister benjamin netanyahu coming out on television yesterday and saying to the world, threatening the world, if you ta

territorial acquisition by the united states the first the united states needed dispossess the indigenous of the continent and extinguish their claims their land. now this manifests federal indian policy and the removal of native peoples to reservations in the pacific northwest. that process starts in the 1850s. that's going to be a subject, a future lecture. the second broad factor, which we will discuss today, is that the united states, the united states needed to interact with other non-native tive powers, particularly the nations of europe, in order to define american to territory. now, most american. came into the nations possession by wars or purchases the revolutionary war, as you see here on this slide, produced most the territory east of the mississippi river. the louisiana purchase in 1803 brought most of the lands between the mississippi river and rocky mountains into the nation and then war with mexico. in 1846 to 1848. in incorporated american southwest and then in 1867 the united states purchased alaska from russia. and so see, with each of those territorial acquisitions, th

i will bear arms on behalf of the united states when required by the law. i will perform noncombatant service in the armed forces of the united states when required by the law. i will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law. and that i take this obligation freely without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion to help me -- so help me god. congratulations. [applause] >> all rise for the pledge of allegiance. >> i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. everyone please be seated. >> please welcome students from macarthur high school who will recite the preamble to the u.s. constitution. >> we the people of the united states in order to form a more perfect union establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the trappings of liberty to ourselves and our prosperity. do ordain and establish this constitution

daniel frith, former coordinator of sanctions policy of the united states department of state, a person who knows about american domestic and foreign policy, if not everything, then almost everything, will be on the air of the tv channel. congratulations. extremely important story, the news came from the state of colorado, the local court gave ukraine and not only ukraine a chance, so donald trump may not get into the american election race. when we read the signals from donald trump, we understand that this can directly affect the containment of russian aggression against ukraine. it's a shame that the world doesn't see the best side of american strategic...thinking these days. donald trump represents the so-called america above school , that is, the school of thought of the 1930s, when the united states had no real interest in european security. it was a disastrous policy. it is not about the policies of the united states government, then headed by franklin roosevelt, but about the mood of congress that prevented roosevelt from doing more in the fight against hitler. the disaster was

anthony blinken, secretary of state of the united states of america said that the united states shouldt ukraine, because the lack of support will lead to significant consequences, let's listen to what blinken said. we must make every effort to ensure that russia continues to fail in its aggression against ukraine. if we we will not, if putin is allowed to continue to act with impunity, it will open a pandora's box of aggression around the world, other potential aggressors will watch, they will learn, they will listen, they will draw conclusions. as jim mattis has always liked to say, and as lloyd austin likes to say, in this case, 1 gram of prevention is now much better than a kilogram of medicine. later, andriy yermak, while in the united states of america, said that ukraine, without the help of the united states, could lose the war with russia, to quote him, there will be a great risk that we will remain in the position in which we are now, and of course this will make it impossible to continue the efforts to liberate the ukrainian territories, and will create a great risk of losing

thing that most people forget about, but is maybe the most important thing is political cover, the united states gives political cover to israel in organizations like the united nations, so israel is never held accountable for anything, so that's basically the the apex. people foreign agents, mean they're lobbying for foreign government to the american government, if you or became agents of the government of italy, would have to register with the justice depart in order to do it, it's perfectly lawful that you become a foreign agent, yeah i can address that pretty well because i've had the government accuse me of um what to attend a conference hosted by an iranian group that they did not approve of and several americans and myself who wanted to go just to attend this conference were told that we would be subject to criminal penalty penalties under the foreign agents registration act 1938 which basically says that anyone acting uh on behalf of foreign government under direction of foreign government which apac definitely does as well as probably 20 other groups um that support israel that i could

taking money from putin, but it's definitely happening in europe, and maybe it's happening in the united statesell. what i am trying to say is that in the end, not only the morality, the rightness and the strength of ukraine's struggle, which lies in its survival... will ultimately unite all of us in the transatlantic community to give ukraine the help it needs, but the strategic imperative will also drive us to do so. directly there are people who claim that by destroying such a number of russian military capability, ukraine is clearly not only doing a difficult, horrific and deadly job of increasing security for all of us, but also making it less likely that russia will ... go after ukraine and attack nato territory. smart people realize this, and we just need some time to sort out this ridiculous campaign politics in the us. what is being said in washington about general zaluzhnyi, and what, for example, could president zelenskyi and president biden discuss among themselves? as the scandal is enough for me, the use of the term "deadlock" by general zulzhnym is not only a situation in washing

well, because the action of the united states in the veto of the new resolution. to understand the minimum resolution in this unfortunate situation in gaza, i think we should consider the factors affecting the decisions of the american government. in the decisions of the us regime, the most effective factors are the zainfuzi groups that influence the decisions of the government . these zainfuzi groups zionists in you it has a very significant power. and they seriously use this power in news sources, in the media, in companies , and through it influence politicians. and they easily adopt this strange position that we are supporting the people of gaza. one remembers that painful picture that was published a few days ago, a palestinian father hugged his daughter and his little girl and said, "you are relieved now, his injured daughter had passed away, what the americans did to people." this is exactly what palestine is doing, that is, they want to kill everyone, they say, well, you will be relieved , otherwise the statement of the spokesperson of the us national secu

christmas holidays or to any religion holidays, because for them they have the superpower, the united states of america, supporting them at the united nations, blocking any v to decision of a cease fire and will also put obstacles against any investigation. of israel war crime that israel has overtly admitted on televisions, therefore for the israelis being a christmas or any other holiday, for them it's exactly business as usual, nothing has changed and nothing will change, and the new yorkers were saying that this shouldn't be christmas as usual in their protest the other day, anyway now is really officials are still talking about being attacked from multiple friends? seven fronts, he mentioned iran, syria, lebanon, gaza itself, yemen, and they're talking of self-defense and all jazz, and they're playing the victim while they're attacking incescently, and the world is watching what's happening in gaza, how could they then ignore all the savage crimes that they are committing uh blatently against palestinians a daily basis? yes, um, thank you for having me, and before i answer this question

just from from a number of leaders, there's a lot more we asked united states need to do because i will give an example with the arab emirate, he stated that she entered into the abraham accords, they would continue with cultural exchanges, education opportunities israel but they expected the united states would engage heavily in those as well. what we have seen in the course of the last several years ago the level of engagement they expected so we have seen this administration not fully embrace the abraham of court, they let them fester a little more so, he ran towards come to fruition with the promise to these arab nations we would be all type in happy collaboration has not come to fruition. it was disappointment and he let me know that so because of the void created by the united states of america, they turn to others out there to fill that void and if we can think of who is filling the void, the united states is not engaging, as china so they are turning to the east and engaging more with china in the united states of america and i think because we haven't engaged like we should hav

present they send call to the united state uh central command or the united state army battleship in the region and they feel that united state can uh protect them, but this is actually is not what's gonna happen uh yemen uh and as we see the central command statement they said four boat have attacked a ship with light weapons like you know either clashen or any type of weapons and that the they their helicopter as well came under attack uh i i could expect that the statement from yemani spoke person will be actually a bit different because i don't think that yeman will send actually uh speed boat to take a ship without having any anti helicopter missiles, it will be actually not wise to send those with light weapons, that's why we're going to wait for the statement from uh the yemeny spoke person and i'm sure that the united state actually they have done one of their biggest mistake because who is in control of the sea is the one who are in control in the land and this is the germany. army and if we see that united states has actually formed the so-called prosperity uh guardian i

although the united states helped craft that resolution, guess what?al vote. that public vote comes amid new reporting that the biden adnistration is working behind the scenes to block a bid for accountability in the region. huffpost is now reporting vested apartment officials are eparing to pressure switzerland to reject global calls for a conference on the va conventions violations in the israel war on gaza. according to state department documents seen by the outlet u.s. diplomats are finalizing a diplomatic initiative to their swiss counterparts that washington hopes will cause them to abandon plans for a meeting to discuss violations of international humanitarian law by both israel and hamas. now, experts say of such a conference were held, it would amount to a major international signal about the gravity of what is actually occurri israel and gaza. so why would the united states reportedly blocks such a move? why object to that? an israeli international human rightsawyer who has been a guest on this show told us that has israel's chief foreign all

the united states has always made it clear that nothing can stop it from supporting its staunch ally. we will support them uh in any way that we can, and certainly intelligence is a part of that, and i won't uh get into the specifics of what that means, isr, other types of collection, we've worked with the israelis uh, you know, over many, many years, and those sharing mechanisms are there, those channels are there to to share information, and we will look to continue to do that. the us has strong historical and economic ties to israel. the us, which has supported the formation of israel since world war ii, is israel's top trading partner. with annual bilateral trade of nearly $50 billion in goods and services. as matter of fact, experts believe the creation of israel was the direct result of imperial powers support, including britain and united states policies. without the external supportism received from the british, none of what we have seen in the past century and more would have happened as it did. british and later american and other external support. were absolutely essential

the next step in front of ships that from britain, from france, from germany and as well from united state, either cargo or maytary, because those ships actually are a type of effort that's helping the giant state in the continuous genocide conducted against the palestinian people, think then you're going to see us reaction. no, i mean, i, i don't think that the us, if they know that they could react, they they will have done uh from the beginning, but as we know that they don't actually uh, the world to be extended or to be a regional war, but it doesn't matter actually for the yemen, because in yemen here we haven't, we haven't got any to lose, i mean yemen has been under bloed under war, hundreds of thousand civilians has been killed by saudi, with total support for the united states, if it was not for the united states. will not be able to any attack against yemen, that's why even though if the united state will actually response, mean they should know that any location in the red sea is very very important and they could cut all the cargo ship that's coming from the united state or to

matthew bryza, ex-adviser of the united states secretary of state, former director of european and eurasianrs at the us national security council, will be working on the tv channel. glory to ukraine, mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. glory. what is happening in the world. what is happening in washington, we do not have time to simply react to extremely different and sometimes conflicting signals, on the other hand , we feel that the kremlin is triumphant, yes, they are preparing to prolong the war, and they feel a certain weakness in decisions on the part of the so-called collective action, and we in ukraine are extremely worried, in particular, it is not only about supplies weapons, but also about money, the ukrainian budget depends on american aid. too much the situation in washington is something completely unexpected for me, and based on our previous conversations with you, which i really always love and appreciate, this is something completely unexpected even for the washington political elite, because support for the continuation of military and financial aid to ukraine is very stro

is complicit as a work or not and continue with up to united states of the united states could demand instantly a humanitarian supplies, and the united states could instantly tell mister netanyahu that door patch to stop . the president, united states could tell mr. nash and you know that that is what has to happen. and i don't think even and after you know, could afford to ignore web dia and how did stage wants to do. but we, the americans are paying a very heavy price for what has been done and as war. and it's going to be difficult or has to go back anywhere else in the world and talk about how other countries behave, resurrection, burma, or in china, or in the central african republic. the united states no longer at the moment, has any credibility, as your monetary country. following up on where you just said, why isn't the us president picking up his phone, giving the is really prime minister a call and saying, now this has to change, and we're going to have to allow in more a water and other basic necessities into the gaza. strip as well as such as that is to stop the bom

now let's go back to the united states , very interesting things have happened in the united states,n my opinion, and the first two projects, which have already been announced in the military-technical cooperation, namely the adaptation of western-made missiles to domestic, well, not domestic, but to soviet, let's say complexes, buk-300, which is in ukraine, and this project called franken, he actually got, well, a new life there, yes, actually an agreement has been concluded about it, about joint production, and this is very, very important, and this joint production will be both in ukraine and in the united states, this is a kind of, in my opinion, an intermediate project, if we manage it very well, well together with the second project... the second project is the help of two powerful american companies, as i understand it, primarily with technologies, in deploying the production of 155 millimeter ammunition on the territory of ukraine, ukraine , again, a very important project for us , and the main thing is that it's joint productions, it's very very important thing. i think that

in today's sub story, the leader of iran's islamic revolution as lashed out at the united states for blocking a un security council resolution on the establishment of sease fire in gaza. america. بی شرمانه قطعنامه شورای امنیت را برای قطع بنباران و آتش بس فتو می کنه بی شرمانانه یعنی چه به تو می کنه یعنی همدستی می کند در ریختن بمب بر روی کودک و زن و بیمار و پیر و مردم بی دفاع. added that the us has been disgraced as the israeli war on gaza helped to expose the true face of the western civilization. he said the palestinian's great victory lies in the fact that they debunked the west and the united states false claim of being human rights advocates. i to harmoni underline that there is no difference between the israeli regime, the united states and britain, as they are all one and the same. he said, "there is no doubt that one day the israeli regime will be..." wiped off the face of the earth. teran has held an international conference on palestan. in an opening remark, iran's president ibrahim raisi said the united states must be tried for the crimes committed against palestinians in th

ukraine must understand that the united states can come to power in the united states... and any of thepresidential candidates, if it is trump, then what policy should we build with his office right now, or do we wait and act according to the circumstances ? it is clear that we are, we, as the state of ukraine must work with both political camps, and this is understandable, because of course both internal and external will depend on who wins the election. us politics, are we doing enough with both camps now, don't you think? i hope that taking into account certain experiences of the past, i think that this is being built up by working with different political forces. with both parties, with different politicians in a specific party, well, of course , for the sake of, if the representative of the republican party still wins, to be able to cooperate effectively in the future to solve the problems that exist, of course we have to concentrate a lot on the fact that we have common challenges, and actually this is the russian federation and china, and by the way, china is now getting closer a

and the world, every best to recognize, united states, there's no political leader in the... united states who is going to stop sending arms to israel, any arms that it wants, so this is the situation, and erdogan knows this, erdogan has power he can exert, and he and he has to not beg the united states to do something, he should do something, every arab country, every muslim country, every country in the world who's expressing concern for the palestinians has to start doing something, exerting their own real material, economic and other kinds of pressure on israel, and united states, but uh, the united states, please, i hope nobody gets the impression that somehow in the next few weeks or next few months, the united states is going to stop providing arms to israel, they are not. mr. cavanoll, you also mentioned the displacements of palestinians from the north to the south, we've already seen that they've done it okay, it seems that the the their next plan is to force them further into egypt and the sai desert, even uh the the iranian foreign minister husain amir abdullah. wa

macroeconomic stability of our state, and i see. several problems, well, accordingly, if in the united stateseat debate will begin in the states, which may end, for example, with a decrease in funding for ukraine, or in your opinion, how actively paris and berlin will be ready to work to support us, that is, at what level, by 100%, by 120% or by 60% . there is currently a debate in the council of europe about money for ukraine, which viktor orban is blocking, it is about 50. or so. i think he will give in eventually. orbán always behaves unstrategically in relation to the transatlantic community and selfishly, i.e. only for himself, only for hungary. that is, he will either give his consent together with other eu members to provide financial assistance to ukraine, or he will have no choice if individual member states decide to do so. however, it is quite obvious that many member countries. in the eu are going to provide aid to ukraine, regardless of what viktor orban says. as you already mentioned, among them are germany, france, great britain, although it is not a member of the eu, but i can

international relations and... the economic zone of any coastal state, the borders determined by the united statesl not cause territorial disputes with russia, the state department claims. we have taken and will continue to take all measures that are necessary for our national interests in this geographical area. the states believe that it will be enough for them to discuss such a solution with canada and japan. according to bloomberg, the declared territory of the continental shelf, with an area of ​​about 1.2 km , contains a huge number of important resource industry, deposits of rare earth metals, oil and gas. most of them have not even been explored yet; after receiving territory, the united states will be able to freely use these minerals. this step, if you look at it from an economic point of view, is probably a kind of foundation for decades to come, to provide the potential for strategic superiority or strategic advantages for the united states in these territories for decades to come. as they think. the united states declared ownership of the shelf in order to complicate the delimitation

to you about these problems that have arisen in connection with the allocation of money to the united statesyou and i already understand that by the end of this year there will be none there will be no allocation of money, and with the problems that... have arisen in connection with the allocation of money by the european union, we already understand that the european union will have to return to this issue at an extraordinary summit in early february, and therefore conversations with western journalists , the appeal to western public opinion was quite seriously worked out by the president's office and possibly by the president himself from this point of view , the importance of communication with ukrainian society. as it has been happening since february 2022, took a back seat. i to you i would like to remind you that from february 2022 , the president of ukraine gives exclusive interviews exclusively to foreign journalists, in fact. the only person with whom he spoke from ukrainian journalists during the entire time of this war was the famous travel brooger, who really has serious achievem

with the united states or is russia is rival of the united states? i think the answer is absolutely clear. and today ukrainians are destroying these probably second strongest rival after china. maybe the first. because we don't know anything about chinese army. but russian army now received unique experience of warfare of 21st century. putin feels emboldened. and who really think that having some even partial success in ukraine he will stop. so ukraine today with no one life, no risking any one life of american soldiers or officers is destroying capabilities of the biggest rival of the united states. so i can't understand how it could be a bad investment than to help ukrainians. we're not asking for boots on the ground. we don't need courage. we have enough of our own. but we just need weaponry. and to provide us with this weaponry, i think that this is the smartest idea and that is the best investment that united states could do. and it is not about when i hear like people saying that ukrainians are to receive $200 billion or something like this, it

who were using united states tools to target people out of the united states.t was necessary because it wasn't designed to keep up with the times. so in 2005, there was a recognition that it was not up to the task. it wasn't necessary because we were giving fourth amendment protections to a target in pakistan who was getting the same rights as a u.s. person in the united states. so we went to congress then. i was part of that effort back then. some of you were tracking this and working on this or were the beneficiaries of this. to change fisa and amend it with section 702 to allow it to have a mechanism to target non-us persons overseas. this is important. people who were using u.s. service providers. the challenge was that we had a lot of targeted were using u.s. infrastructure because ours is second to none in the world. we didn't have any way to compel them to assist the government. so change the law to have a programmatic approach where we go to the court once a year with the procedures that we are using to determine if someone is an appropriate target. the

and the united states is complicit in that. you know, if you, if you give somebody guns to commit a crime, you get charged in, in state courts and his gun and america were given to got into the israel. and you know, you can sample change swift. so the, mr. newton. yeah, that's a stop. it's but here's, here's a load of weapons do whatever, you know, do whatever you want. well, i mean, what is mr. brian? thank you, sir. with that. and then what was going to do with those weapons? we must stop this. it is not just about a ceasefire. we have to cease war. we have to cease war as an instrument of policy . we have to end for once and for all 4 were well and us and it's, it's, it's mind blowing that in the 20 and the 21st century. we're still dealing with these questions about, you know, or about worn justifying it. it's just just finally then, uh, that is some and i should say the arab league, i wanted an alms involved go on on israel. which of course would stop the weapons and british weapons to just find the very briefly in the run

during monroe's presidency , eastern florida was annexed to the united states, and the missouri compromiseween the southern, fishing and northern free states. the independence of the new states in central and south america. on december 2, 1823, in his annual message to congress, james monroe issued a declaration of principles for the foreign policy of the united states. the main principle was the division of the world into european and american systems. the idea of ​​us non-interference in the internal affairs of european countries and , accordingly, non-interference of the latter in the internal affairs of the countries of the american continent was proclaimed. the idea itself was proposed by john quincy adams, secretary of state in the administration of president monroe, and the reason for not... was plans for a holy alliance of russia, prussia and austria, to restore spanish dominance over the latin american colonies that declared independence. the monroe doctrine was the answer: the united states should not participate in the internal affairs of european countries, and european tyrants

from the point of view of economy and other possible resources in the united states, with this movement of industrial complexes to the military, this is happening in the regime itself it has also been chauvinistic and this incident has always been followed by this regime during the past 70-80 years in order to be able to say that my situation is not normal and i have to pay special expenses. to raise the level of this regime in order to defend itself , thank you very much. now to point out how much the direct military costs of the al-aqsa storm have been for the regime since the beginning of the al- aqsa typhoon. the defense economy sector that i said means the condition where you are not involved in war is the condition of reconciliation. and the expenses that you have to pay , according to the announcement of the united nations in 2022, the official figure of the defense expenses of the zionist regime was 205 billion dollars, which means that you spent about 20 billion dollars a year in the state without war 2 years ago. it was a war machine , yes, but now when it goes to war conditio

the united states has an immigrant culture. i think that's a wonderful thing, and i have no problem with bringing immigrants into the united states. i think it's with may bringing immigrants into the united states and huge numbers in the 19th century is what made this country great, and it's what will keep this country powerful into the future. so i have no problem with the emigration. the issue for me is how to think about realistic behavior versus moral behavior. when you think about how state should act in the international system. and i fully understand that states have a deep seated interest in security competition for the purposes of maximizing their chances of surviving. and i fully understand that state sometimes do ruthless things to other states for good strategic reasons. okay? but at the same time, there has to be a moral dimension that under pins how states behave towards other states. and as long as there are no sort of strategic reasons for realist, reasons for behaving ruthlessly. state should go to great length

with israel and the united states, it is hard to imagine a world free of violence.he region is totally in line with its ambition to have a world without violence. in other words, iran's dream to have at least a region free of violence and extremism has shaped to a considerable extent its foreign policy. how do you assess the usa's role in promoting violence and extremism in the region and in the world? امروز افزایش تنش در شرق. that cannot today we see increasing tensions here and there in west asia, in eastern europe, and you can see the traces of the united states in all these tensions: we believe the us policies promote violence in the world, creating a multipolar world order, respecting international laws, respecting other nations rights such as the self-determination rights are some essential factors that can contribute to a world free of violence and extremism. unfortunately, these factors are all being violated constantly by the united states of america. it seems that the influence of the war industry in us politics drives the country towards war and violence,

just before you on this program, we had a guest larry johnson, well-known in the united states, a militarynst the american military operation in iraq, but then there were slightly different times, and it was possible to take such a position without having all the dogs put on you, and so mr. johnson said: just recently, at this program, he said that he did not see the possibility of, uh, a russian agreement with the united states on ukraine. he said that, from his point of view, they would either refuse to negotiate or simply be deceived. and he said the only chance he sees is to finish this.

the military direction, no matter how it is presented, is not strategic for the united states; the united does not need an american ukraine, as many may think, the united states. we know the story with afghanistan, with vietnam, the most revealing option is when the americans fought in vietnam, when they merged their own allies, maximum destruction in ukraine is beneficial for them, and it is beneficial for them to limit the geopolitical capabilities of russia through ukraine, so take the destroyed ukraine, it is restoring. europe, europe's dependence on the usa is main interest. europe as a periphery, use those intellectual, economic, financial, technological resources of europe to strengthen the united states in the most powerful , most powerful struggle with china, that is , concentrate the resources of europe at home, take them to yourself, turn europe into a simple periphery, entertainment. for tourists, yes, come there, see everything, that is, not on your own, but some mercedes and bmw will be made in the united states of america. peter, okay, well, look, bloomberg writes that with

united states? i would get, oh, i was get a guest only because they've been added longer that it would be, uh, the bread. no, actually not. united states had emitted 25 percent of the carbon in, in the history in the last 200 something years. and europe, the $28.00 countries of european union, 22 percent. if were china because china is now the big, the big, the big feeling of the story, trying to hasn't meet at 12.7 percent. but of course, if you go to emissions per capita, i mean, you can compare chinese 1400000000 people. united states is how much 300 something needed. so, so that's the thing. western countries, if you go, if you get north america in europe together, it's 62 percent of the carbon emissions in the history. so who is suppose to be pay this check? now, not agenda numbers. you know, south africa, marco fernandez, is a researcher with a tri continental institute for social research, and he's going to join us on the come back by the way, i'd like to continue this conversation with you.

council with an ultimatum, either the council adopts text that is convenient for washington or the united states will once again block the adoption of any product. the draft that is now being put to vote was initially in our view entirely toothless, but respecting the initiative of our arab colleagues and their needs, we were read ready to support it under pressure from the usa that essentially intercepted the authorship and usured work on the text. the scenes at various levels, twisting the hands of those in the region, with each new drafting the text lost more and more important provisions. ultimately, the wording that is being put to vote today has been extremely neutered including its op4 on the mechanism that would be supposed to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance to gaza and ensure its monitoring, but worse than all of that, through the efforts of the american delegation, the draft resolution has included an extremely dangerous element for the future of gaza. instead of the wording on immediate sessation of violence in op2, an ambiguous phrase has appeared, calling for the

of us debates right, within presidential debates within even just the political culture of the united states, they say... that they want two-state solution, but everything that they support is actually the elimination of the palestinian people. and on that, are we looking at that being really a goal that you think that that is what uh, not only israel but the u.s. is after, edward? i mean, if we want to take a look at what's happening on the ground, just in terms of the mirror number of bombs that have been dropped, we're looking at about 29,000 from the last count, that number i'm sure has increased because this is from few days back, and these are majority of... all provided by the us and what's more alarming is the types of bombs, 43% of them are called these dumb bombs where they have no direction as to where they're hitting, they could hit anywhere, they just drop them and it explodes where it explodes, so we can see how that also is a contributing factor to the large number of casualties that have taken place, are we looking at them wanting to make gaza unlivable for the palestinians?

, and these are people who are convinced that the united states is guilty of some crimes againstppressed humanity, then you ... see what a wild pro-khamas campaign is unfolding on all leading television channels and newspapers of the united states, and we see that according to all the polls, that biden is losing support, this is natural, he is losing the support of those very structures that ensured his victory in the 20th year, that's who, that's again the left-liberal blood, that's african americans. who completely voted for ayan, now they sympathize with palestinians and young people, young people from 18 to 35 years old, 85% voted for ayan, now these are people who graduated from american universities, where such left-wing propaganda about the guilt of america has been carried out for decades the peace of the nominated people , they also do not vote, they do not vote for biden , has long said that in order to complete his... function as the leader of the free world, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the united states in this world war against tyranny, biden must r

but of course, we've seen instances with a, with russia and ukraine now with united states in israel, with that stuff in the used veto, to completely frustrated through united nations. and of course, the most i knew they stopped in the united nations from it doing its job and trying to bring about peace and security and stop conflict from spreading. this pretty clear as we've been helping you in finding it incredibly difficult to do his job on the ground, helping people. so it's not in the affecting the un itself as an organization and well opinion because people play into un, very often with and forget that actually the you and is any is good, has been the states a lot of debate. but it's also being affected, but it's really, really important work in getting food and water and fuel and everything else to, to 2400000 people who have got to be shopped into a desert coastal strip. and that really is the ultimate failure. i don't just for a brief, it's in a, in a way. it's hardly reminiscence of the end of the league of nations. when the emperor haile selassie made that appeal and a cold