united states. the united states is the biggest donator of support and two-piece but we don't need to lose europe. they want to note steps. we have to be open to understand how did -- >> more reactions are coming into the contentious oval office meeting between president zelenskyy and president trump. tammy duckworth posted this attacking our democratic partner in service of an autocratic dictator. trump is a national disgrace. ben lujan reacted in this way -- shameful, embarrassing and dangerous. and from the house, connecticut democrat, jahana hayes released a statement saying today's oval office meeting was deeply troubling. the u.s. must defend democracy over authoritarianism and it is indefensible to side with putin over our steadfast allies in ukraine. president trump is scheduled to adjust a joint session of congress on tuesday to lay out his priorities and vision for the country in his second term. we will have live coverage beginning at 8 p.m. on c-span followed by a democratic response. we will also take fewer calls and get your reaction on social media. that is live on c-span, c-span no

the united states. i'm going to say because the united states won world war two. but i have to point out that that's an exaggeration. it flatters the united states most of, well, two thirds of the casualties inflicted on the army of germany were not inflicted by the american army and inflicted by the soviets. okay. so the soviet union thought we won world war two, which also complicates this story. and i have to i will admit, i like complicating things. i like things complicated hearted, but when americans think we won the war and they think, well, somebody like charles lindbergh was wrong in saying, you know, we shouldn't go to war, it's not in america's interest. one of the things that he said was, you know, if we go to war by franklin roosevelt, we're saying we have to go to war to defend democracy. and lindbergh said, wait a minute, wait a minute, who are we going to go to war with? we're going to go to war with britain. is britain a democracy? well, kind of in britain. but what about in india? what about in the rest, the british empire? we're going to go to wa

doesn't mean subject merely to the jurisdiction of the united states, that is, subject to the laws of the united states as is virtually everyone on the united states soil including aliens who are here illegally, or are here for the purpose of bearing a child to make it an american citizen or does the jurisdiction of the united states mean something more than that. fully complete jurisdiction requiring an allegiance that comes from a permanent lawful commitment to make the united states once home. one permanently and lawfully resides. i believe that this interpretation is compelled by the citizenship clause is text structure and history as well as by common sense. i have time for just a couple of brief opening points. first, the text of the clause. subject to the jurisdiction of the united states means nothing more than the duty of obedience, the laws of the united states, why did its framers choose such a strange way to say that? why did they not just say subject to the laws of the united states? doing so would have been quite natural given that the state -- straightforward unambiguous phrases used in

united states, because that's where we terms of the highest. and the one thing that present trump is trying encourage is to remind everybody that your investment in united states producing in the united states will be a source of high returns and will not only benefit americans, but will also benefit the rest of the world. because we then create a marketplace where your product, your, your, your investment dollars can be the most productive. so, so i think the, the, the fact that our, our partners are, are right now reacting to the carriers just because of we're trying to level the playing field. we're trying to take away the unfairness of specific taxes on american products like automobiles and cars. and yes, the average terra between is that old sentries is pretty low. but when i talked about average tars prison, trumpets really trying to target terrace to achieve very specific shifts in strategic industries that will benefit the rest of the world by reallocating resources to better a strategic partners. and in terms of our supply chain is a concern. the one thing we learned from the cold it was, we cannot have one single source for important products like pharmaceuticals. and so w

the united states. from attorney's perspective, we are very eager, very happy to move some of the manufacturing jobs to the united states. but the us government need to make it so that the investments in the united states will be protected. and there will be no discrimination against investments from one country versus another country equal treatment should be applied and the quality of life, but need to be improved. the professional training need to be provided to the style . for example, lots of things need to happen at the same time before any significant amount of manufacturing jobs will follow back to the united states. or if you look at the countries that have been threatened by trump, they tend to do 2 things. yes, they impose retaliatory tariffs, right? they fight back, which is also what china is doing and will continue to do. but also they make some concessions. typically, do you see china making concessions to donald trump into the us as well? i would say for the past 4 digits of mall or turn that in the united states are always being re adjusting their relations with each other. i would not call them concess

what i know that russia is currently against the united states, i'm certain that would not be an accurate statement of the current status of the united states the united states -- >> i am confident considering what russia is currently doing against the united states that the united states' status against russia would not be that -- considering what we are facing from russia operations, yes. >> all right. thank you very much, congressman turner. we'll be right back with a lot more "face the nation." stay with us. be right back wit baltmore "face the nation." stay with us. tracey from lillie's of charleston will watch 60 contestants eat 60 hot wings all covered in lillie's hot sauce oh honey, don't touch your face will be in this ad 60% of the time great job, bob! at ameriprise financial we know our clients are so much more than clients. they're go-getters and game-changers, legacy-leavers and visionaries, healers and confidants. the goals that matter most to you matter most to us. helping you achieve them is what we do best. with personal financial advice from an advisor you can trust, and goal-based investing and solutions. it's no wonder w

the united states that's changed. in moscow the feeling is the united states has converged with russia and russian views. that is what has shifted the dynamic. the united states has shifted and europe has a realized if it wants to be serious about its own security and also about a long-term settlement for ukraine which is essential for european security than they need to change as well. that will be the big question as we look ahead. he is not joining us as i learned, -- no benjamin: he's welcome on stage. fiona: we've got prime minister starmer of the u.k. coming in thursday. the writing is very much on the wall for everybody, but ukraine's is also the future of european security. and the swedes and the finns joined precisely because they realized you need to have european security. the finns are ready to go. they are probably one of the best, most battle ready at all times not just because they had the experience back in the beginning of world war ii when they were invaded also and had to fight them on. so i think a really consequential time today where every chicken has come home to roost. benjamin: th

it's interesting at this period of time in the united states because of the industrial revolution, the united statesitself had now gone through its own. and this is the very early days of the forestry movement, their desire to conserve the environment in the united states. and so the apes decides use this fund to hire a lecturer or to travel around pennsylvania advocating for preserving in the states in state which really had been denuded the landscape because of both farming industrial revolution and so this this lecturer would go around and historians have written about this and he started off with a very small audience member or three, and then it grew larger and larger. he was this incredibly gifted lecturer, and after several years, the state creates the department of forestry and appoint him the first director of forestry and the state, and he then in honor of francois andre michaux decides to name the first state forest michaud forest in pennsylvania in recognition of those funds that were used to support this endeavor. thank you for that question question. if andre was a botanist royal botan

the ,., ., , ,, states format. some presence of the? —~ ~ , ~ states that is normal. i that ukraine and the believe that ukraine and the united states a united, such as a large—scale invasion, they were probably the strongest. 22: -: 7 n ithis'ki’ndr 7 n ithisrkindrof becaoserpreoisosly this kind. of prior there was no list support prior there was no list of level of support, probably it was no because it was no full—scale even ten years because it was no full—scale not even ten years because it was no full—scale not sure en ten years because it was no full—scale not sure that n years because it was no full—scale not sure that all ears !m not sure that all i“evolved — ——————— ——— — — and lro not sure that all ”matted ——7 we,” and not im not sure that all ”flushed ——— ~ —~ —— and not have strongly and would not have russia. it would've strongly and would not have strong |. it would've strongly and would not have strong signal, jld've been a stro'ng's'rgna'l; a ' as been a stre'ng's'rgne'l; a ' as to preventive signal as regard to the full—scale invasion. as to salvage a regards to salvage a relationship that you asked =||—: will continue is .

the united states operations. >> you are con -- >> i'm confident what russia is doing against the united states and the united statesthat considering what we are facing from russia operations, yes. >> thank you very much. we will be right back with baltmore "face the nation." stay with us. tracey from lillie's of charleston will watch 60 contestants eat 60 hot wings all covered in lillie's hot sauce oh honey, don't touch your face will be in this ad 60% of the time great job, bob! at ameriprise financial we know our clients are so much more than clients. they're go-getters and game-changers, legacy-leavers and visionaries, healers and confidants. the goals that matter most to you matter most to us. helping you achieve them is what we do best. with personal financial advice from an advisor you can trust, and goal-based investing and solutions. it's no wonder we have a 4.9 out of five client satisfaction rating. ameriprise financial advice worth talking about. >>> join us when president jump addresses congress. it starts 9:00 p.m. tuesday night. cbs news 24/7 special coverage begins at 5:00. we'll be right back. ♪♪ ♪♪

the united states to come to canada. we have the same challenges that the united states does with china. m, and if the united states came to us and said, we want to integrate our economies more, but you need to help us impose the same tariffs on china as we do to stop them dumping steel and aluminum into our countries. i think we would all look at this very differently if it was a spirit of cooperation versus imposing tariffs on us, and the excuse that, brianna, you mentioned before, the fentanyl, um, between 2022 and 2024, there were over 60,000 pounds of fentanyl seized at the mexican border. there were 54 pounds from canada in january. it was 0.5oz of fentanyl. i mean, this is not serious. so we're really worried because the president keeps talking about us becoming the 51st state and he, you know, continues to demean canada. it not only makes us angry and sad, it's also deeply concerning that this practice is continuing. >> yeah. and certainly the fentanyl thing. to your point, those numbers check out it's it's a really minuscule amount compared to the southern border. very minuscule.

to happen on the 2nd of april is the well why countries that have terrace against the united states the united states isn't going to respond. and she said, well, we don't really have any terrace against the united states, especially for things covered within the trade deal that we have. so she's hoping, i presume that mexico is going to be left out of that with if that's how president trump and these have ministration on this time. things i guess is another matter. she also talks about what mexico has been doing up to now there was a real sense of disbelief when the tires were announced this time around. because mexico has some things like sending 10000 members of the national guard to the board. that stopped fence and the detroit stopped migrants just as president trump off full. it has done things like send 29. a quite infamous criminal operative submit. the were met some prisoners prisons across the board to, to the united states. and all those gifts didn't seem to click kate, donald trump, gonna listen to now a little bit about her saying what mexico has been doing and also the threat really low.

consultations numerous consultations did take place between the united states and every single mission represented in this council. the united states drafted this text to mark the commitment of the united nation and the security council to bringing durable and to the war in ukraine. our resolution is simple straightforward and focused on the future not the past. the united states calls on member states to vote on the resolution today, the third anniversary of the conflict escalation when we have momentum behind us and because we do not have another day to spare. every day that goes by withoutpeace means more people dead , more destruction, more misery. the united states has consulted with councilmembers throughout the weekend and all morning and into the afternoon. we believe this council has had sufficient time to consider this simple text, the draft implores a swift end to the conflict and further urges a lasting peace . we can and should and must agree on that. mr. pres. , it's time to vote. i thank you. >> the representative of the us first put forward a proposal to adjourn the meeting till 3 pm 25 february. the representative

the office of the come to the oval office of the come to the oval office of the united states and attacked the united states trying to prevent the of your destruction of your country? a lot of destruction of your country? lot of_ let destruction of your country? lot of let stuff in 7777b7e7g7inr71i7ng.7first 77 7777b7e7g7inr7ii7ng.7firstof 7 7 7 77 7777b7e7g7inr7ii7ng.7firstofa7ll, 7 7 7 77 fghe beginningjirst of all. the war, everyone has even you 77 _7 77 even you but you 7 even you but you have, problems even you but you have, you don't feel it now but you will feel the future. you don't feel it now but you will fl tell the future. you don't feel it now but you will fl tell us the future. you don't feel it now but you will fl tell us were iture. you don't feel it now but you will fl tell us were going don't tell us were going to feel. — don't tell us were going to feet. were _ don't tell us were going to feel, were going _ don't tell us were going to feel, were going to - don't tell us were going to feel, were going to feel, l f to solve a 77 to7e a p7em. i requiring to solve a problem. i not ou requirin

the united states. and of course, of the term of the united states towards the pacific. you know, the conflict, they secured through the complex idea, a logical decoupling between the united states and europe and undermining of the atlantic community. he's exist asshole threat to the current to the economy. you repeat the alerts but and so this is why they try to somehow remedy this situation by similar pania slate down by problem. pretty great. increase of the defense spending of the integration of the european union by the same time, combining it with, you know, maintaining both corporation with united states in a corporate, at the way through pieces, through trying to you know, engage from the thoughts of the us. what are some, uh, negotiations by bringing some good ideas and then he said this 3 year waiting at the start from multi spot, this props and then the continuation of, of the war i and so on and so forth. ultimately, the principal wants to all, to leave grow. you know, they understand that uh, this is the last presidential term on the top administration. they

the states to give the approval. i did the patient adoption, that it has to be adopted from one source only the united states. if the united states discipline, they can talk about the construction and they can talk about how we're going to give them money and from where otherwise we are wasting over time to, to power for his anomalous that i had a little earlier. the summit was not just about our country's looking united, it was about our country's actually being united because they have a minus task on that hand. in order to account to trump, to account to israel. do you think they all united in that way? i think own or mistakes we cannot talk about the so called the national security, this security or national security for each country. and each dentist behaved independently. and if think about their interest, then be able to be able to think about the be the philistine issues or out of issues. and now they have their own interest in their relationship with the united states. i'm not sure if they jeopardize this in order to attack the police didn't issue the financing issues. i think if you go back to this because i noti

and some would still depend many, it would still depend on the united states, including the europeans. but the united states at this point, has not tried to uh to make sure that all its vassal stage would vote with, with the u. s. united states did not lean on the europeans, did not give an order to its vassals, to use your language to make sure that they aligned themselves with the american, with a new american position. the united states has just changed its own position and is arguing uh with, with, with the european about the, the wisdom of that position. so it's not, as it's not as simple as the does, it does it sometimes, as, as, as it's something new. sometimes it looks also let me, let me underline one important issue. many of the countries of the wood or the bricks group, including china and india did not vote with russia on that very important issue of the chinese of the in just abstain. they have their own reasons why they upstate in odessa, but they've always been abstaining on the, on the, on that issue of probably because of the issue of jerry tauriel integrity of national sovereignty involved

pretty much with a changing guest list at times embodies all of nato apart from the united states, the united states. the key plank to all of that. but it's obviously seemingly here. like we have a third track emerging for peace plans. remember, initially the u.s. spoke of their two tracks, the united states and russia, and then the united states and ukraine. well, they were supposed to separately move towards ideas for a peace that then would conform and try and work out a solution. it's clear the u.s. ukraine relationship or that's in jeopardy to say the best at this point. so now we have europe trying to find a way of creating that idea to move forwards, that potentially the united states can be happy with. what we still don't have in all of this is the most important thing. a rapprochement between trump and zelenskyy. that does seem like a distant prospect at the moment, constantly changing this world. but that rare earth deal needs to be signed, and there needs to be a clear suggestion from the united states that it's willing to continue military aid. the big fear here is that as this relations

the united states. a lots of fentanyl bits in the united states has produced in the united states. it's not clear what donald trump wants on the surface, or even a little deeper. he could want to re alignment of global trade in a way that benefits the united states. he could want something else. you may be using these tariffs as an intimidation tactic to extract concessions and future trade agreements. or there could be something, uh, you know, deeper and uglier. um, for me, what i see, i see a, uh, unfortunately a nation in decline. nation that is withdrawn from the international system of it's an acceleration of a trend towards isolationism that began in the week of $911.00. you remember, you know, you're either with us or against us. that actually continued a little bit under obama, with the bi american. and then we saw the 1st trump term, the 2nd trump term a now and in between bind and, and print, dividing it ministration did not take off the terrace of the 1st trumpet administration. but if you asked me what this is about, i would say one thing, it's a vote. is it like i do th

threat to you, great, which of course doesn't exist as an existential threats to the united states unless the united states goes to war with russia. but then again, of course, of present bite and every european may so lead to send repeatedly that they would not comfortable with russia. so in taking that off the table um, you know, the trump is not actually sacrificed anything of the, the other aspect of course is there's a great many people in the american establishment and within the trump administration. things which is really trying to that is the existential threat to america. enough that to is greatly exaggerated, bought um, what is quite obviously true is the trying. there is a vastly knowledge of richer and more powerful states and therefore relatively new potential rifles the rusher is. so from.

uh, some would still depend, uh, maybe it would still depend on the united states including the europeans. but the united states, at this point has uh, not tried to, to uh, to make sure that all its vassal states would vote with, with the u. s. united states, uh, did not. uh, the uh, the on the europeans did not give an order to its vassals, to use your language, to make sure that they aligned themselves with the mag, with a new american position. the united states has just changed its own position and is arguing uh with, with where do your fee is about the wisdom of that position. so it's not, as it's not as simple as the does, it does it sometimes as, as, as it's something i knew sometimes it looks also let me, let me underline one important issue. many of the country is of the wood or the bricks group, including china. and india did not vote with russia on that very important issue of the chinese and in june, abstain. they have their own reasons why they upstate, you know that, but they've always been abstaining on the, on the, on that issue of probably because of the issue of territorial integrity of nation

zelenskyy and the ukrainians, and then i'm confident that the united states will be there to support that effort because it matters to the united statesp the killing and make sure that vladimir putin's aggression didn't result in a good outcome for him because the entire world is watching whether aggression will be rewarded in modern times. maria: secretary, there's a report out of europe that says this norway fuel giant with, a large company in norway, is refusing to fill u.s. submarines after the trump-zelenskyy crash -- clash. it has declared it will no longer help the u.s. navy. your reaction. >> well, that's pretty outrageous. i hope that reporting turns out not to be true. the norwegians, the europeans have deep economic relationships with the united states. the united states' military has worked closely with all of those europeans both inside of nato and biharmly during my time -- bilaterally during my time as a secretary of tate. -- can state. hope that reporting's not true. the navy will need european support as as it moves around the world, and it's doing an awful lot to secure the lives of europeans as well. maria: you've w

europeans we don't need to lose them, they are good allies for the united states. united states is the biggest donator of support and of peace, but we do not need to lose europe and they also want to know next steps. we have to be very open to understand how to stop the war. reaction to the oval office meeting between presidents trump and lenskyy continues to come in. chuck schumer posted this. trump and vance are doing pun's dirty work. senate democrats will ne stop fighting for freedom and democracy. michael lawler had a longer post that reads -- >> and gregory meeks, g member of the house foreign affairs cmittee said this -- >> next week on the c-span networks, the house and senate are in session. the house will vote on gislation to repeal energy and environmenl rules. the senate continues voting on president trump's cabinet nominations including secretaries of education and labor. both chambers are facing a march 14th government funding deadline. the house can begin voting on legislation to extend funding to the end of september 2 of her shutdown on tuesday. the senate forei

the united states. and the problem here is that the united states government has a monopoly, especially when it comes to um space when it comes to military satellites, because the ukrainians were also getting information from us military satellite. i see a us spinal the 3 satellites. so it's a huge disadvantage and it's, it is something that other countries are prohibited from sharing was ukraine, for instance, a u. k is not allowed to share any intelligence with ukraine. and essentially, the troops effects a bracing or planting it affects the troops on the ground. meaning that the russian forces can easily surprise them without the ukrainian troops being able to track their movements save for the use of an f b drones. but they cannot provide an overall picture. and so it was also military equipment, but was out intelligence, which is the critical, it's a backbone of for an operational planning. it will be very difficult for ukrainian troops also to defend against long range strikes, for instance. right. so that's very nice for next, i mean, i mean on defense almost at the king's commission on that. tha

uh, some would still depend, maybe it would still get down to the united states, including video dns, but the united states. uh, at this point has uh, not tried to uh to make sure that all its vassal states would vote with, with the u. s. united states, uh, did not. uh, the, uh, the on the europeans did not give an order to reach vassals to use your language, to make sure that they aligned themselves with the matter with the new american position. the united states has just changed its own position. and is arguing, uh where, where, where do your p is about the wisdom of that position. so it's not, as it's not as simple as it does, it does it sometimes as, as, as it's something new. sometimes it looks also let me, let me underline one important issue. many of the country is of the, with the bricks group, including china and india. they did not vote with russia on that very important issue of the chinese of the in just abstain. they have their own reasons why they upstate, you know that, but they've always been abstaining on the on, on that issue of probably because of the issue of jo dory. busy integrity of

so as long as the united states treaty run in this manner, the writings are not going to negotiate. and i should also have the united states as a guarantor in gaza. yet the united states allowance is radius of violate the deal, the united states, as a guarantor in the cease fire for 11 on, but the regime is really resume continuous occupied parts of the country and it kills, that'd be nice citizens. so when you look at that, when you look at the minster course, when you look at what, which the americans will behind the germans and the french. and when you look at the writing nuclear deal and how the top tore up the deal and the best buy, and they did the deal of obama pre run, it's very difficult to imagine how we could possibly negotiate with the united states. and trust me, i can survive by their commitments slide. you can stay with our team to national for all the latest i'm around the world. i'll see you again. the the last one is fit. is that the correct for the 1st? the 1st thing in the last meliss peter, cause also pro, so we're letting you for one degree, your solution solution the city the suppose this subspace ge

to you, great miracles does exist as an essential threats to the united states unless the united states goes to war with russia. but then again, of course, of present bite and every european may so lead to send repeatedly that they would not comfortable with russia. so in taking that off the table, i'm going to, the trump is not actually sacrificed anything of the. the other aspect, of course is there's a great many people in the american establishment and within the trump administration things which is really china. that is the existential threat. to america, and that's that too is greatly exaggerated. bought um, what is quite obviously true is the trying. there is a vastly knowledge of richer and more powerful states and therefore relatively new potential rifle. the rusher is so from a purely rid of this point of view, it makes like some sense to trying to reduce tension with russia and concentrate on china and trumpet ministration has basically been, you know, suggesting this is from nixon to china. moment in reverse, that trump is, is going to, in a sense, go to moscow or meet with

security guarantee for ukraine because if the united states has a strategic interest from ukraine's resources to participate, then it's obvious to me that the united statesegic interest and therefore guarding the strategic interest while involving ukraine security both sides have a chance to win. maria: there is a feeling if the united states is there excavating for the rare-earth minerals that there is implicit security that the u.s. feels president trump feels the fact that the americans are on the ground digging in and excavating along with ukrainians that that is an implicit security in a message to russia, do you agree with that. >> if i as the president of poland had a choice whether the natural resources of my country would be used by the united states of russia i would choose the united states without hesitation. maria: do you believe putin will stop if there is a cease-fire or do you worry poland is next. >> of course there is always a fear because as i said at the beginning we know russian imperialism. maria: let's say hypothetically speaking president trump in zelenskyy makeup and sign a deal what do you believe securing the region looks like.

you're doing is diminishing the capability of the united states to hold on at a time when it's footprint in the world is shrinking. if you take the united states together with the other g 7 countries that used to be the dominant block of the world. but united states like just a numerate themselves by no kind of the japan, germany, france, italy, and brit. okay. the g 7, or i'm going to add up all the, the g, d, p gross domestic pro, total output of goods and services of all of those 7 countries. us and it's major allies. and now i'm going to compare it to the growth ended up g d piece of china. and it's allies know now is the brakes. okay, you end up united states about 28 percent of world output. you add up china in the breaks. it's 35 percent of the world output. we aren't the wealthiest block in the world, number 2, a, and that's new. and that changes every se, every country and asia, africa, latin america, trying to figure out who to go to borrow money from, who to go to, to deal with who to go to sell your exports. where to go to, to invest in your railroad, you know, where they used to go. washington london, powers, of course, now they g