we have a unit, we have two personnel unit. i ooze -- i like to be little pitt mor -- bit more concrete wt we're talking about. what kind of cases and how many numbers. i know we've had presentations to that. i don't have a problem changing the name. 1.3, even peer support member as you identify it, peer support member what that means. it's a new definition or reinforced definition in terms of 1.5 as a reference to a clinical psychologist. chief of department is there designated for purpose of resolution as peer support clinical director. i can follow that. for me in terms of a medical director or anything close to this, i have to examine what we have at this present time. which is one full time medical staff person. there's a lot of definitions as to differentiation of that. to be honest with you, you made a statement in terms that may have minimal budget impact. it sound like there might be potential budget impact in term of this position. that's just one position. again, as we move off and we look into it, i'm looking for th

but we also have to be fair to the people of the united states and the taxpayers of the united states. youprime minister, thank again for joining me for these important discussions. we are both outsiders to politics. can you believe it? to politics.ers i look at all these wonderful politicians. we are determined to protect the rights and needs and interests of our citizens. i look forward to partnering with you to build on the incredible it from -- incredible friendship between our countries and to creating a brighter future for both the people of italy and the people of the united states. and with that, i want to thank you very much for coming to the white house. it is my great honor. prime minister conte: good afternoon, i want to thank you for your hospitality is it -- hospitality. it is a sign of the special attention to italy and me as well. forgive me, but i don't want to renounce the privilege for speaking in my wonderful language now. translator: i wish -- for all of families of the victims the fires at the place in california. i wish to say a very affectionate hello to all ou

it could be ten units? that is a nine unit equation? >> we filter things out based on the existing policies that are established in the city and we have very strong demolition controls generally. we heavily discount the capacity of any properties that have existing residential units on them. generally, we would not count that net nine units. >> so you filled -- filtered it out. but on commercial corridors where there is a single, you know, one story commercial building, that could go up four stories. >> we use a rule of thumb to calculate data. typically, our rule of thumb has been 30% threshold. it is an as built condition and not more than 30% of the building envelope. we would consider that a soft sight. it is a rule of thumb. qc projects at the commission where the project is built down to 50% of the zoning. and if somebody wants to come in and add on or tear down, some sites have almost nothing on them and they never turn over. it is a general rule of thumb that that is kind of the median of what you will see over time. >> presiden

case of the united fruit it. headways were wonderful tax free concessions to things but honestly practically every western company all over latin america and asia had the same at the same conditions basically they had the bargaining power they had the technological advantage and the money these places wanted them and the deal was very little taxes. in our age tax avoidance or tax planning as it as it's called in business schools has become a central feature of business globally and that's a quite different situation from when you know developing fragile states in the one nine hundred centuries we're offering low tax low taxes now it's the core of business if. a multinational can easily avoid was gorgeous lation in the sovereign states where it operates by using a method which is well known today transfer prices where profits show up in the countries with the lowest tax levels of uki so we prefer the lab this is a political issue do we want this money to be given back to the public authorities to be used for the c

they were transferred to the united states. they sent a huge amount of -- $400 million, as a contribution to the campaign of hillary clinton. that's their personal case. it might have been legal. the contribution itself. but the way the money was earned was illegal. we have reason to believe that some intelligence officers guided these transactions. so we have an interest in questioning them. that can be a first step and we can also extend it. they all can be found in an appropriate legal framework. >> did you want donald to win election and did you direct any of your officials to help him do that? president putin: bringing the u.s.russia relationship back to normal -- i think there are three questions from the russian pool. today, you have the floor. reporter: thank you so much. good evening to everyone. my name is ilya patrenko. r.t. tv channel. in english. mr. president, would you please go into the details of possibly any specific arrangements for the u.s. to work together with russia in syria, if any of these kinds of arra

the united nations and the yew -- the united kingdom and the united states are also strengthening cooperation between our armed forces who serve together on battlefields all around the world. today the prime minister and i viewed several u.s.-u.k. special forces demonstrations. we saw some demonstrations today, frankly, that were incredible. the talent of these young, brave, strong people. we saw it at the royal military academy. seamless cooperation between our militaries is really just vital to addressing the many shared security threats. we have threats far different than we've ever had before. they've always been out there, but these are different. and they're severe. and we will handle them well. we also recognize the vital importance of border security and immigration control in order to prevent foreign acts of terrorism within our shores. we must prevent terrorists and their supporters from gaining admission in the first place. order security is a national security problem. and in the united states we are working very hard to get the democrats to give us a couple of votes so we can pas

work that the united states wants to have. is that consideration is extremely important so i personally still think that the united states we need to find a way around delay the solution. on the margins of me getting back to it but it cannot be implemented in a way that is seriously actually makes the ability of india to be a part of this defense bill what the united states wants to have now i personally see it as a bit of a paradox of the american power structure when the defense policy of the world's second most populous country reaches india is being held hostage to some senators you know in new jersey or a club i wonder how is it perceived in india the fact that any given country would . attempt at least to tell you who to do business with and who not to do business with you know is as countries grow bigger. they see that. the orly's a quid pro quo kind of place and certainly prime minister more they has built many many bridges in his forty years. you know he has gone to some fifty five different countries to build his bri

we are not just people united for israel or americans united for israel but christians. were young people putting ourselves out there and thousands and thousands of students across the nation that are going to be educated on israel and going to be spreading the message to parents and families. the donors make a big difference in our lives and we cannot thank them enough. i love this country and are israel and feel that we need more strong questions in the united states congress that are fighting for righteousness and fighting for liberty. that is my dream and my passion and i feel god has placed on my heart and i will keep doing that for the rest of my life. >> good evening. my name is brooke and i'm from san antonio, texas. [applause] i have the great privilege of going up at cornerstone church and cornerstone christian schools where he learned from a young age the importance of our support for israel. as a christian under pastor's leadership i have learned have responsibly obey the bible. you can't read the bible without seeing god's love for israel on nearly every pag

between mexico and the united states. it is a personal story for me because i lived there for almost six years in the 1990s. i went back and forth frequently. it was hard to believe that these were similar in sized cities close to each other. because they were so distant and some new ways. it was a rough-and-tumble city. piecework low value added manufacturing. san diego was a beautiful but isolated beach town. i was hard to imagine that they would ever get together. something started to happen in the early 2000 began to evolve. its own research and department operations. you saw the growth of some state capacity. and the cultural scene coming out of there. has anyone gone to tijuana not to tijuana for lunch or dinner. they have some of the best food scenes anywhere in mexico. anywhere on the west coast as well. great success this to goes from electronic to classical music and opera. i say this in my peril. i know it was a little bit of competition here. san diego was once the quiet little town. a nice place to go visit.

there's six units and four unit buildings. it's very mixed.the building next to us is a massive building with 16 units. it is a unique site. as you can see from this diagram, the yards are pretty grand. the shortest one is 34 feet away which is the apartment building. some of these other yards are 8. there's a lot of greenery. there's lot of openness there. also, we're building units that are 800 square feet, 1400 square feet and 1600 square feet in 2000 square feet apartment at the top. one of our d.r. has a 3000 square foot house three stories. we're trying to figure out how to put family homes in these flats and not try to create builds that are too big but just the right size for the site. [please stand by] >> that was all asked by the -- by the planning department. and also, the -- another thing that came up is the planning department asked us to change the character of the architecture to make it more in keeping with what the neighborhood is, so we changed from a much more monolithic building to a much more carved out textured building,

that is what we do with the united states. can do more and we can work with our central american friends. there is sufficient common ground in that respect. theer: a question from audience of that leads into our concern about the drug cartels and wondering how change vis-a-vis the narco trafficking with the new administration, what the state of clay is, how effective have we been in limiting the rise of these cartels? amb. gutierrez fernandez: if you look at what most people think, we have not been successful enough. insecurity, has gravitated in mexico's election. think that the last haveistrations in mexico confronted as best as possible, organized crime. methods, where not doing a good enough job. it would not be appropriate not to recognize that. i think, we need to take into account that this is an issue that takes a long time to address. experience in other areas of the world would point to the fact that there are no silver bullets to address this. number two, we need to do a better job in the conversations we've had wit

they're accessory dwelling units. we don't want this -- i think it would be bad for the housing world to say, hey, we're going to try to figure out a work-around and add more density, especially when a.d.u.s are supposed to be smaller and affordable by design. so having a maximum size and minimum size, and maybe based on a percentage of the main house, with a maximum, you know, all that stuff makes sense, but i also do want to reiterate what kristie wine said from spur. i'm missing the reasoning behind not allowing a.d.u.s in brand-new construction. there's a lot of different ways -- the concerns that are out there can be addressed simply through a strong definition of what a.d.u.s are, size and suitable by design and things like that. so i do think it's a missed opportunity to not be adding immediately additional housing that would be affordable simply by its shape and size and that seems to be -- that seems to be a solution looking for a problem. i'm not sure why we're removing the a.d.u.s from new construction. tha

unit. the layout of the three-story alternative is not good. we have a smaller units backed up behind the garage. and then you are two floors of living space and a three bedroom. it reads more like a single-family home with an a.d.u. i lean towards -- i think we can revise the fourth story but i did not hear a lot. i cut the deck off the back of the third floor. i know you shake your head to. you want your single-family home back for the cobbler who will not live in the valley anymore. [laughter] but no, it is not at. we just heard about people who live in 2200 square-foot buildings and so -- i have not had to interrupt one person as i heard the debate. a ledge at its -- legitimately believe i too have three kids and i live in a 2200 square-foot home with a unit back behind that my mother lives in and it is a thousand square-foot unit. that is what we will get on the second one. not a two flats that will dominate two families. that is what we want. it is two. i think we can take off the dec

the united states produces him if i percent of the steel we consume. our defense needs consume 3% of the total steel consumption. how could one possibly make the case that we do not have plentiful abundance of domestically produced steel to satisfy defense needs? that it is not only that, for the other 25%, where are the biggest sources for that steel? that would be mexico and canada. those are the two countries that provide the most steel. with both of those countries we have a surplus of trade in steel. the canadians by more steel from us than we buy from them. so to the mexicans. where's the security threat to america when my constituents .hoose to take the steel >> that was pat toomey talking about steel in the u.s.. there is been a dispute concerning subsidies that the canadian government gives to the this has been, litigated multiple times under the north american free trade agreement. we have the construction industry in the u.s. but the london producing side has been .ssued >> our guess this morning josh -- -- and daniel griswold. , forlcome yo

likely you and the united states we don't do this. we don't have the resources or manpower to organize this total state of control, not part of our plan and it is clear we did nothing of the kind against trump. >> i would like to ask a couple specific questions about nato. if nato were to move to at ukraine or georgia to the alliance how we respond? >> translator: negatively. the situation around nato is going along those lines. i have a clear understanding of the decisions i made. before the consensus-based decisions are made on the organization there is an opportunity for bilateral conduct with member states, poland, romania which deploy elements of the strategic antimissile defense of the united states, direct and immediate. accordingly, moving this nato infrastructure towards our borders would be a threat and reaction would be extremely negative. >> secondly there are two major nato exercises leaders this year, anaconda and trident. did you and donald trump discuss those and did he give any indication as he did with chairman kim o

the intelligence agencies of the united states but also the people of the united states. he took a kgb officer, a known liar's word for it. why he did so if it had to do with the desire to not be seen as illegitimate, i don't know. i can't really get into that. i'm not a doctor. but i can tell you, on the facts the united states was attacked. and president trump today sided with the enemy. >> how unprecedented is that, especially here on foreign soil? >> it's -- i mean, first of all, we say this about president trump every week i think. doing something unprecedented. it's incredibly unprecedented. also, when's really shocking is there used to be a thing in the country where if a poll sirn didn't try to understand what was special about the united states of america, and the ideals to which we strive, the fact that we don't think of ourselves as brutal, we think of ourselves as at least trying to spread democracy throughout the world, and with the foreign aid we offer, et cetera, president trump -- used to be if you didn't express belief for that in politics you were dead i

lend lease did, indeed, rescue britain but also rescued the united states. it mobilized the nation's industrial might from coast to coast. factories that had produced lawn mowers, vacuum cleaners, textiles started making gas masks, automatic pistols and high-precision instruments. the automobile factories began to build cars and labor force was booming, millions of men and women of all ages streamed into factories and worked on assembly lines, vocational high schools were on overtime, training and retraining american men and women for new roles in the workforce. the manager of the state employment service in the small city of york, pennsylvania, said in january 1941 a year ago our task was to define jobs for men, now our task is to find men for jobs. and what about housing? all the new workers needed places to live near the factories and so roosevelt set up an agency called the division of defense housing that supervised the construction of 2 and a half million new homes along with schools and recreational facilities. all this powerful activity and energy pr

without this uniter it's very -- unit it's very difficult to tie them together. we're looking at 38 ftes. one the things a we did when going back to the foot patrol issue, we had patrol bureau task force. we decommissioned it to staff up our units. we like to start this unit back because there's a need for it. they will investigate high profile and serial cases with sophisticated networks. the idea is to have plain clothes and undercover personnel on serial burglars, serial offenders and build prosecutable cases across wide range of charges. this would be in partnership with the district attorney's office. again, that 38 fte that we believe it will take to sustain that unit. i want to reemphasize that we did have a smaller version of this unit that we basically decommissioned last year to get it going. that was a tough cut to make. it was something that we felt was necessary. we do really believe that we need to reinstitute this unit and address our crime issues. the next thing on the list is the station investigations team. as i mentioned, when we decentralize i

rich as the united states. do you agree with that? >> don't agree with that. i think that countries like the united states, where we have incredible wealth, are precisely the hekinds of countries if you do have poverty you want to find out about it because we haves the resources to addr it. >> reporter: in the case of alabama, the challenge of proding proper waste treatment to all citizens may finally be greetting aed with proposed bipartisan legislation. in part, alston's visit brought. >> and in this day and age, everyone should have access to quality affordable, waste water systems. >>ng reporter: ade republican legislators mike ogers and shelley capito democratic congresswoman terri sewell and democratic senators doug jones and cory booker have introduced bipartisan bills in the house and senate that if passed will offer federal assistance to households for sanitation systems. how does that make alabamians feel that the united nations felt they needed to send somebody who they usually send to third world co

maybe he won't squeeze the president of the united states either in the next election. the thing that is that. is the perception right now that trump is the united states look or see this because he is the president but he is the united states fully the full use of research so there really be people in. the year in japan in canada says yes flipping to react and we're going to deal with whatever he's shows it does but let's not go all the way let's take a look you know in another couple of years what's going to happen are the americans still going to be gung ho after an american america first america alone president or they can just say chickie was recorded all wrong so i think that right now while all different various governments state the trying to whether it's the. the canadians or the e.u. or japan they're likely to be very grown up about this and say yes we're going to react to specific cities said the trumpet ministration it certainly does but let's not go sort of let's not hyperventilate just. go but. do you agree with that or does it matter if the rest of the wo

phil gal welcome to the program well president from past triggered a storm of controversy in the united states after openly favoring a brushing president vladimir putin over his own intelligence agencies the two presidents held their first ever summits today in helsinki just days after the u.s. indicted twelve russian agents during the twenty sixteen election during the press conference that followed the main thing mr putin did nine russia had meddled in that election it's a trump follow this up by saying he saw no reason for russia to meddle in the directly contradicts the findings of u.s. intelligence agencies. so i have great confidence in my intelligence people but i will tell you that president putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today and what he did is that incredible offer he offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators with respect to the twelve people i think that's an incredible of thank you. because voluntary shoals has been covering up a summit welcome terry so the u.s. president siding with president putin over his

by and large, that is what we do with the united states. we can do more, and we can work with our central american friends. i think there is sufficient common ground in that respect. walter: a question from the audience that leads into our discussion, i think, concern about the drug cartels and wondering how policy might change vis-À-vis the narco trafficking with the new administration, what the state of play is, how effective have we been at limiting the rise of these cartels? amb. gutierrez fernandez: if you look at what most people think, i think it is clear we have not been successful enough. that's another statement. rather insecurity, is something that gravitated very much in mexico's election. for the right reasons. i can only think, first of all, the last two administrations in mexico have confronted, as best as possible, organized crime. by many different metrics, we are not doing a good enough job. it wouldn't be appropriate not to recognize that. i think it's a very -- i think number one, we need to take into account that this i

the united states have had to pay for them. if you go back 10 or 20 years, massive amounts of money that the united states has played -- paid, we have stepped up like no one has. this has gone on for decades. no other president brought it up like i bring it up. something has to be done. the secretary-general has been working on it very hard. meeting, last commitments have been made for over $40 billion more money spent by other countries. that is a very small step. it sounds like a lot of money small is as a -- it is a amount of money relative to what they owe and what they should be paying. it is an unfair burden on the united states. we are here to talk about that. i'm sure it will be resolved. i have great confidence in the secretary-general. he worked very hard on this. himve great confidence in and his representatives. would you like to say something? >> it is great to see you here. it is good to have you here for the summit. we are going to discuss many important issues at the summit. we all agree that we have to do more.

very closely coordinated, the united united kingdom and the united states are strengthening cooperation between our armed forces who serve together on battlefields all around the world. today the prime minister and i viewed several u.s./uk special forces demonstrations. we saw demonstrations today, frankly, that were incredible. the talent of these young, brave, strong people. we saw it at the royal military academy at sandhurst, seamless cooperation between our militaries is really just vital to addressing the many shared security threats. we have threats far different than we've ever had before. they've always been out there but these are different and severe and we will handle them we well. we also recognized the vital importance of border security and immigration control in order prevent foreign acts of terrorism within our shores. we must prevent terrorists and their supporters from gaining admission in the first place, border security is a national security problem and in the united states we are working very hard to get the democrats to give us a couple of votes to we can pass me

they were transferred to the united states. they sent huge amount of money, they sent huge amount of money, $400 million as a contribution to the campaign of hillary clinton. well, that's the personal case. it might have been legal, the contribution itself, but the way the money was earned was illegal. so we have a solid reason to believe that some intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions. so we have a -- an interest of questioning them. we can all -- that -- that could be a first step, and we can also extend it. options abound, and they all can be found in an appropriate legal framework. options abound, and they all can reporter: and did you direct any of your officials to help him do that? president putin's translator: yes, i did. yes, i did. because he talked about bringing the u.s.-russia relationship back to normal. >> i think there can be three questions from the russian pool. russia today, you have the floor. reporter: thank you so much. good evening to everyone. my name is ilya petrenko, rt tv cha

i would between the uk and the united states. iwould imagine between the uk and the united states. canadian press on the president how important free trade is and what damage these ta riffs free trade is and what damage these tariffs he is doing could do to the global economy. let's bring ron back m, global economy. let's bring ron back in, this will play well with people backin in, this will play well with people back in the united states?” in, this will play well with people back in the united states? i think it well, there are a lot of people who are very much concerned about ta riffs who are very much concerned about tariffs and the impact on american businesses across the united states, why is the president doing it at this time, why is he going to verbal wa rfa re this time, why is he going to verbal warfare with our closest allies and i think it's an opportunity for the president and the prime minister to reassure a very nervous president and the prime minister to reassure a very nervous american business sector. i imagine, iwas wondering earlier, if all the guests would com

today no country does more two-way trade in the indo-pacific than the united states. in southeast asia, the u.s. is the single largest form of investment larger than china, japan and the european union. open amount of the indo-pacific today and it's dotted with u.s. and efforts to build self-reliant business institutions and promote private sector growth. the philippines, there was a business that helped the country return into a crucial part of the semiconductor semi chain. in malaysia general electric invested in a sales and service center, and today, 1300 employees in the country from kuala lumpur. i want them and their leaders to know that america stands ready as we always do for partners around the region, to deepen government, people to people ties based on our shared democratic values, i'll travel there in the week ahead. chevron was the first company ever branded oil expiration rights in thailand and in 1973, they discovered the first hydrocarbons in thai waters. this gave birth to a major local industry. today chevron is thailand's top natural gas and crude o

the united states was instrumental in creating the united nations human right commission. preceaisely because we believe the inherent dignity of all women and men. it was meant to be in the words of its first chairman, "place of conscience." when it's serve ed this functio it's provided a voice for the voiceless. it's brought the injustice suffered by political prisoners to international attention. it's put spotlight on crimes of assad and the kim dictatorship in north korea. these have been the exceptions, not the rule. it's been a bull by pulpit for human rights violators. it's focused its attention unfairly and relentlessly on israel. meanwhile it's ignored theflict cuban, zimbabwe and china. the fume rights council is the united nations greatest failure. the birthright of every human being and it's reduced its to just another instrument of international politics. the obama administration decided to join the supposedly reform human rights council in 2009. then secretary of state hillary clinton vowed that the united states could improve the council by working from the i

states, to the united and by the way, italy has a $31 billion surplus with the united states. meaning we have a $31 billion trade deficit. and we discussed that and we are going to work something out. prime minister conte's translator: as far as i'm concerned, i'm very envious of the records and the growth of the american economy. we discussed that before with donald. somehow these are systems which cannot be compared because of the magnitude of orders of magnitude -- i'm in this but ambitious at the same time. i'm ambitious for my economy to do a lot, much more than what was done in the past. we are preparing structural reforms that we will be submitting to our european partners, too. i do not want the tax reform to be set aside. it was a leverage in this country. it represents a leverage for economic growth. it represents a leverage for economic growth. we are also working on streamlining and simplifying red tape and registration and regulation to eliminate corruption pockets. we are trying to speed up the civil trials, the procedures and the proceedings for all sectors toge

they were hoping for support from the united states.urse people are very afraid that they are not getting it. i mean, it's important to remember what the united states has stood for in this part of the world for so many years, for democracy, for human rights, for an idea of security, for an idea of security, economic progress, economic freedom. to suddenly have the united states appear to be doing some kind of strange deal with the country that stands for the opposite of those things frightens people. the russian relationship with trump is one of the deepest mysteries of this presidency. it's one of the oddest things about trump. this is -- putin is the one world leader who he never criticizes. he'll criticize his allies, he'll country xi jinping, he'll criticize his allies in congress. but he'll never criticize putin. it may be we'll learn something from this meeting about why that is, or it may be that we won't, and that will simply increase the sense of paranoia in this part of the world. >> bernard-henri levy, the united states has

the president is doing great harm to the standing of these united states. while kowtowing to the number one enemy we have on the globe, vladimir putin. he will continue to do so if he isn't checked and the best eulogy check him are not democrats but his fellow republicans. what the president has done is an insult to all of us. democrats, republicans, independents. we all have to stand up together and push back. ready for your questions. is in your view that the only as the nation for this is that the russians have something on them? his behaviors so inexplicable and so against the interest of the united states and what all of his advisers would tell him that americans are scratching their head and saying, if that's not the explanation that putin has something on him, what is it? what could it be? when you say republicans are the best check, what check can democrats be? if it's really that far, why not take the apple and go out? the gavel. have the best thing we can do is first the truth to power. silence here is not acceptable. the second thing we can do is

they have the right to go to the homosexual unit. >> within the homosexual unit, inmates are classified as either masculine or feminine. >> so are you masculine or are you fem? >> i'm gay. i'm gay. >> okay. >> not me, honey. i am fem. >> you've got your masculines that are more manly looking but straight acting, straight looking. >> he asked me to massage him. >> okay. what's really going on? >> then you have your fems that are -- some of them take hormones so they act like girls. they live their life as women in the word. transsexuals, drag queens. they're walking around with bras, thongs, things in their hair, being real dramatic, loud. 80% of the fights are the fems. shut the [ bleep ], [ bleep ], [ bleep ]. that's [ bleep ]. that's [ bleep ]. >> though eloy orosco is housed with the masculine group, he was once classified as feminine at an earlier stay at bexar county. >> this time around i butched up a little bit and said i was masculine. and they put me in the masculine group. i don't want to be with a bunch of drama queens and girls. i'm trying to be with the masculine group, wit

he defends the interests of the united states of america. and i do defend the interests of the russian federation. we do have interests that are common. we are looking for points of contact. there are issues where our postures diverge and we are looking for ways to reconcile our differences. how to make our effort more meaningful. from the ot proceed immediate political interests that guide certain political powers in our countries. we should be guided by facts. can you name a single fact that what -- would definitively prove the collusion? this is nonsense. just like the president recently mentioned. yet the public at large in the united states had a certain perceived opinion of the . ndidates during the campaign different people could express their sympathy in different ways. isn't that natural to be sympathetic towards a person who is willing to restore the relationship with our country, who wants to work with us? we heard the accusations about -- as far as i know this company hired american lawyers and the accusations don't have a fighti

what if they make a deal as reported in the united states that the united states agrees to allow assad to stay where he is and pulls out troops and hoping that russia can move iran back and then abandon the field to russia and iran. it is really serious. these things and putin comes in well prepared. we were talking to jake the last time and president kennedy when he met with his russian leader in '61 was unprepared a. >> there is certainly plenty to be on the table. what will be on the table and how is it discussed? we will see and see together. christiane amanpour and jake tapper, thank you. we will go back to new york. we will keep you aware of the schedule as people are showing up. good to see you both. >> you, too, chris. great to have out the ground for us. we are mention away from putin and trump meeting. our analysts are here next. lilly. she pretty much lives in her favorite princess dress. but once a week i let her play sheriff so i can wash it. i use tide to get out those week old stains and downy to get it fresh and soft. you are free to go. tide and downy together. send yo

how many units -- >> 80 units. 81 units. >> director richardson: that is stunning. for project two, how many? >> i don't have all the project information. i think those are really listed to give a sum. >> director richardson: it's very important. we're going to produce the next amount of housing unit every year. which is nothing compare -- i spent some time reading mohcd, your 2018-2019 consolidated plan. extremely sum of money there. how are you going to spend it in a year when you have 81 unites here. >> we can have a conversation about the revenue side. we'll engaging with board of supervisors and the mayor and certainly looking at new revenue measures to help support it. there's that component of it. >> director richardson: it's a must to have. even with the revenue projections you will still be talking about them to us. you'll have a serious shortfall here. the other question is, i haven't been able to find out even how all the projects and the pine line. our project here, we are trying to get it out of silos. it's a must. we have to march to your department. w

gdp growth in the united states was? negative 11.6%. so we're talking massive recessionary conditions. not surprisingly by the way. visit all been predicted because government spending but after the war. we had slightly negative growth again in 1947 when marshall made his speech here in the context this was truly an extraordinary act of statesmanship, but we considered it to be fundamental to our own economic future. stalin always insisted that we were doing this for ourselves. we were, but not in the way that he saw it. one thing i talk about in the book that is truly remarkable is the mindset of the business community, the commercial lobbying firms in washington changed dramatically after the second world war. they were traditionally mercantilist and protectionists but they were brought around to the thinking that their own prosperity depended on rebalancing the global economy so that our allies could sell to us. that was the only way we were going to make a permanent revival of the global economy. the immediate day de

the latest is the united states hears you. the united states supports you.nited states is with you. how is that bound to go down there? is that something you think the iranian people will take to the bank, so to speak and come out and depose their leaders, hoping the u.s. will support them? >> well, christiane, as you know there is tremendous popular frustration in iran, political, economic, social frustration. but if you look at the collapse of authoritarian regimes throughout history, especially more recently the 20th century, 21st century, it usually has two key prerequisites. you need pressure from below, but even more importantly, you need divisions from above. i would argue what the trump administration is doing with their policy is that they are trying to incite pressure from below, but they'll simultaneous simultaneously reuniting rather than dividing the iranian regime. what you will have is a regime willing to use overwhelming force and sly lens to stay in power. and you have a society which isn't willing to die en masse to take power. and so for t

you're not denying united states is a democracy do you believe united states is a democracy? if so, if it is a democratic state then the final conclusion in this kind of dispute can only be levered by trial. by the court not by the executive, by the law enforcement. for instance, the concord company that was brought up is being accused, it's being accused of interference, but this company does not constituently russian state, does not represent russian state and i brought several examples before well, you have a lot of individuals in the united states, take george soros, for example with multi-million capitals but doesn't make his posture, the posture of the united states. no, it does not. satisfaction there is the issue of trying the case in the court, and the final say is for the court to deliver. we're now talking about private individuals and not about particular states and as far as the most recent allegation is concerned about russian intelligence officers, we do have an intra governmental treaty please do send us the request. we'll analyze it properly and we'll send a

bush, the president of the united states. saddam hussein is being removed from power. and a long era of fear and cruelty is ending. the government of iraq and the future of your country will soon belong to you. >> things, however, very quickly started to turn dicey. >> the city of baghdad has now experienced five days of looting. government ministries, hospitals, museums, the homes of the wealthy and even the palaces of saddam hussein have been stripped bare. >> we saw the looting and the total disorder in the streets and frankly, the indifference on the part of american authorities to what was happening. >> the pentagon says coalition forces will indeed get that unrest under control. but that has not yet happened. >> it wasn't just that there was disorder. the society is being torn apart and there's nobody in control. and that was our fault. >> mr. bush declared an end to the military phase of the war in iraq and called the battle a victory in the war against terrorism. >> the administration's very intent on actions that sho

he said i think the united states has been foolish. insulting and blaming the united states, saying i think we're all to blame. those are his real feelings. he shared his real feelings in helsinki, so now what? >> when i talk to the folks that are still doing the heavy lifting, they continue to do their duty. they expect to tell the truth in a way best suited to communicate to this president to get it in his head. that is a challenge that we have with all of our chief exec tiffs. >> how do they phrase things to get in his head. how do you do it with this president who seems to reflexively revert. and in this particular case. they say it had no influence on the election, and occasionally you can get him to say something like the russians meddle. i thought it was striking when he said i agree with the agreement that the russians meddled, but he didn't say who or why. i would have been struck and impressed if they said that yesterday. >> it's worse than we know because your friend has said that the warning signs, the warning lights, are b

they understand what united states means, but it is not written down anywhere. anyone who negotiates with north korea knows you have to write these down or they do not have any weight. in 2012, the leap date deal, i was excited about it, and they did not write down a mature -- a moratorium on long-range testing including space launches. get a space launch, and the united states said we told you that was a violation. north korea said, it was not written down. you have to write these down. the fact we have not written anything down is discouraging. let me answer, what does denuclearization mean. some people point to the 1992 denuclearization agreement between the north and south, in which both sides north and south not test, they would manufacture, produce, receive, weapons,r use nuclear nor would they possess plutonium reprocessing or uranium enrichment facilities, and they would use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. that was the denuclearization agreement of 1992. is that denuclearization? or is it non-nuclearization? they did not have nuclear weapons to get

states senate, the united states house, and the united states president. >> the forensic evidence and allegation. remember, every one of them supported by evidence of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is enormously compelling but also equally important is what's left unsaid to the americans who are named in the indictment, not by name but, in fact, they are included. and the other americans that may be targets of the investigation. there's also a message to the members of the house of representatives who engaged in that stunning spectacle last week where they were ha ranging and harassing constituents their concerted campaign to discredit and stop this investigation. it is about our national security. the next step for the united states congress has to be to persuade or compel the president to address this threat to our national security. it affects not only our american democracy but also democracies around the world. and now more than ever at a time of threat to western democracy from this cyberattack by vladimir putin, we need to be rallying together. i think the united states senate

her unit is in escrow as we speak. kristina also didn't tell you that she herself empties parts of her building in the last year there by adding to the density of our neighborhood and adding average rents. mark hermann likes to have conversations here at the neighborhood and at the hearing, highlighting my wife's native origins, the size of her family and i see had deep concern about using the building to how's her family memory -- house her family and not tenants. these are not acts nor statements of people endeavoring to act with us in good faith. they have not asked us to meet. we have continually invited them to meet us. in fact just two days ago we accepted supervisor's kathrin stefani's offer to mediate a discussion between the principals and kristina and mark, like other times, rejected the invite. we don't want the good feeling of the neighborhood to be washed away with a few bad apples, so weconcrete was replaced with stucco wood brick, to soften all materials widely used in the neighborhood. windows were decr