lot of things that i wouldn't have gotten to do i think he helped me get my first job at the university of chicago. after i gottennure at the university of chicago, he asked me, he was counsel to the president and asked me to come to the white house to work for him again. that was an enormously important experience in my life. he was probably my greatest mentor. he -- i learned a lot from. one thing i'll mention, i think he understood government better than anybody i can think of. he was a congressman from the hyde park district of the city of chicago. he was a judge and chief judge and then he became counsel to the president. he served in very important capacities in all three branches of government and had a better understanding of how each of those branches and all of those branches work together to create a more perfect union. my interest in administrative law, a lot of it came from him. justice marshall was the debatest privilege of my life to have clerked for justice marshall. he was the greatest lawyer of the 20th century bar none. and partly, what did he do? lawyers like this don't exist a

now that the university of chicago -- i work in the busiest trauma center in the state and on a hot summer night we see tens of young men who are perforated by the bullets that fly through our community, men and women in fact who are bleeding and suffering and on the one hand it is really important for us to be there, to stop the bleeding, to repair what we can. on the other hand most of what we do is bear witness. we have no capacity to reshape the social and cultural framing that lead to these bullets flying through the air every saturday night on the southside of chicago, we can bear witness to the impact and stop them but we know what makes a neighborhood safe, lincoln park is a safe neighborhood. it is not about policeing, it is about investment and it is about racial hierarchy, it is about the way in which we prioritize the people. i can't fix those things. i can only see the physical manifestations of an unjust society, in the bodies of my patients. i see these patterns, part of the point is to bring the intimacy and understanding of, and how they do so differentially and the shared

joining us leave is steve pincus the university of chicago. >> it is a pleasure. kristen: as we show some highlights today, what are some thoughts that struck you as you watched the funeral along with everybody else? >> the funeral tried to marry tradition with some indications of change for the monarchy and the u.k. as is tradition, the funeral was very closely modeled on the funeral of queen victoria in the early 20th century. both the procession route committee and the date -- invitations to royalty and foreign leaders, but there were indications also of a change -- a changing britain. there was a short speech by the secretary-general of the commonwealth, the first black secretary-general of the commonwealth, indicating a move towards a more diverse britain. the archbishop of canterbury is himself the grandson of a jew, which would have been unheard of in the early 20th century. in, there was an indication of change. of course, -- body was carried to windsor in a modified hearse, which had not been the way funerals had taken place in the earliest -- early 20th

of the supreme court and her judicial philosophy. this took place at northwestern university in chicago. democracy. >> recently supreme court justice kagan talked about the legitimacy of the and took place in chicago. [applause] [indiscernible] >> good afternoon everyone. it is a great honor to welcome you to the howard visiting scholar lecture with u.s. supreme court justice kagan and give a warm welcome to special guests. we are honored to be joined by members of justice kagan's family. we are honored to be joined the daughter of howard treen. d.m. anand: as well as members of our judicial branch and number of university leaders. i would like to take a moment to thank our law school team in bringing together today's event. since 1989, the scholar program has invited a leading jurist to lecture and offer alumni, students and faculty with a perspective on the judicial process and the program was accomplished by howard treen and in recognition to the firm and to northwestern. he joined as an associate and became a partner in 1956 and headed the executive committee from 1977 to 1993. he had

after washington for a law firm, she became a professor at the university of chicago law school and thenarvard law school and made important scholarly contributions to our understanding of the administrative state. she also served for four years in the clinton administration as associate counsel to the president and then, as deputy assistant to the president for domestic policy. between 2003 and 2009, she served as the dean of harvard law school. and in president obama nominated 2009, her as solicitor general of the united states. a year later, the president nominated as associate justice of the supreme court and took -- and she took her seat on august 7, 2010. we are so honored to have the opportunity to dialogue with justice kagan and hear her insights. please join me in welcoming her. [applause] justice kagan: [indiscernible] -- his role in shaping sibley austin and making it into the global law firm that it is today. i got to know him even before i was -- i came here five or six years ago because i started out my teaching career at another chicago law school and people in chicago, th

and that is the key thing for the university of chicago is even looking into so called chemical have takes this wearable contains an integrated many pump which transmits chemical substances under the skin that match a given d r. experience. the researchers have identified to find substances that cause specific sensations was, which is set to be homeless in small doses of full body have to keep that company such as tesla, metal amazon on developing suits. so that uses can feel touch force and thermal feedback on their entire body. this would make the on training more realistic. and that's better at engaging on muscle memory. but it will still take a while before such suits become readily available. i imagine it probably will be a day where we do have that's the reality of so body suit since and magic displays . but in the future de la, since everybody devices a pro b, as in the short term solution to do b, b r one full body should, is the task lawsuit which provides tactile feedback through electoral stimulation. it can even recreate the feeling of rain on skin or temperatures, arrang

degree and from there he went on to first columbia for a masters in economics and then on to university of chicago where he received his phd and then he spent most of the 60s and 70s teaching various schools. amherst, brandeis, ucla and cornell. and then in 1980 he joined stanford university andthat's where he's been ever since . >> if there were no hoover institution with a mainstream university have hired him? >> tom could have worked at any college, any university he rewanted. he turned down offers from places like dartmouth, university of wisconsin. he could have gotten tenure and work at any economic department. it's quite clear. he was quite talented scholar in his discipline before he ever began writing about racial controversy. just a number of academic publications . surpassed most people in the field. what tom ran into trouble with was the faculty lunch. the college administrators and so forth and i think part of the problem was this was the 1960s . and higher education was changing. you had women's rights movement and i gay rights movement and an antiwar movement. all these things were

. >> you wanted to ask about the university of chicago ethics o studyy was that mentioned already? >> note neither of us is mention that pickwick you are familiar with it on an audience member asked her point out study shows renewable are more expensive is the 2019 university of chicago ethics study. are you familiar with the study? this was directed bucca to andrew and then. >> i have to be honest i'm not familiar with that said if it. >> am familiar with the study. these studies tend to be way too conservative. we have to keep looking at things. one thing is the ability solar and wind are unreliable or place in the first 10% as cheaper than replacing the second 10% of the third 10% per you have fed more and moree, of the unreliable infrastructure to get a larger and larger percentage. but you the whole unreliable info structure as well. look at a place like texas they spent $70 billion to get to 21% solar and wind. due to the 75% number you are three and half times that. you have to spend all this new w money on infrastructure. a really important point is this drives up costs. wha

joining us is randall crossner, currently a professor of economics at the university of chicago. i have two friends' kids that have you as a professor. their name will go unnoticed i will not mention their names they're terrified, perhaps, of this interview professor, welcome back to cnbc. >> i hope not. >> i think -- do we care if it's 75 or 100 basis points tomorrow? zpr i think we do. if the fed surprises the markets and goes 100 basis points, that suggests that they're much more worried than we think they are and i think that would cause a lot of tumult. but i think, it's pretty clear that they'll go 75 i don't really see why they would need to move 100 basis points i don't think they were that surprised at the core inflation numbers that were not coming down, because rents are such an important driver of that and rents are lagging. i think they'll start to grow at a lower pace, but not yet. >> and what do you them to say you know what i mean, as a former fed governor, you had to break out your thesaurus every time you wrote a statement how is the market going to interrupt thi

thomas fisher is a board-certified physician at the university of chicago medical center serving the same cel-sci community where he was raised. serving as a 2010 white house fellow ennis special assistant to secretary sibelius and hhs action plan for reducing health disparities. he hashi garnered high praise for his portrayal of humanity crisis in the underscoring of the critical obligation all of us have to care for each other. natalie moore is an award-winning journalist based in chicago whose reporting tackles race and housing economic development and inequality the latest book is a play about abortion her book is the 2016 chicago review book award for nonfiction and nonfiction book of 2016 contributed to southside a collection of stories of the criminal justice system in collaboration with the marshall project and in 2018 for the 100th anniversary of the 1919 chicago riots she cowrote a 30 minute audio drama that aired on wb easy portions were adopted in 2019 we are grateful for the engagement with our f programming and our please welcome doctor fisher and natalie more. host: th

the need for more oil and gas reflects several realities says ryan kellogg, professor at the university of chicagothe economics of energy. first, renable energy isn't as readily available as oil and gas. ryan: the issue with low emission energy or zero emission energy is trying to deliver both reliability and sort of low expense at the same time. it's that combination that's really difficult and something we haven't really done yet as a society. ali: and energy companies have to answer to shareholders. ryan: if i'm a fossil fuel company, i'm not going to invest in these technologies if i don't make money doing it. and that's certainly not what my shareholders are going to want me to do. ali: those priorities are laid out in new internal documents from the energy companies, released by democrats on the house oversight committee. in a 2020 memo, shell urged employees not to give the impression that shell is willing to take actions that do not make business sense. it also asked employees not to imply that net-zero emissions is a sll goal or target and that shell has no immediate plans to move to net-

and what i mean by that after he won the prize and left the university of chicago he said about writing popular books that were to general interest readers. he did a lot of speaking to groups on campuses and elsewhere and he felt the role of the scholar was not something to talk to your peers but to display your discipline to those who were not in the discipline so he has written book after book and claim english plane spoken pros for everyday people. it's one of the reasons people were disappointed a few years back. even after tom left he was still teaching through that column and he was the best professor people had so i think that public intellectualism to a certain extent that friedman was a mentor. >> he studied under a persuasive left-wing economist you thank you would've turned out differently? >> no. probably not. he was very much his own man george stigler was another economist that he studied under in chicago he studied under jerry becker working on his masters. but no. he is his own man. even after studying under friedman someone has to figure this stuff out i don't think a p

after college, you went to law school at the university of chicago. dan: before i did that, i was a political pollster. i would be flying all over the country as a 22-year-old advising candidates and the fact they listened to me discouraged me so much i decided to go to law school. david:david: the fact they were listening to a 22-year-old. what did you do after you graduate? dan: i went to work for lehman brothers. david: you were an investment banker. how long did you do that? dan: three years. david: then you went into private equity. dan: a firm that became oak hill partners. david: you did that for how many years? dan: 14. david: how did you become close to or get to know mike bloomberg? dan: it is actually a funny story. in 1994, i was sitting in the stands of the world cup semifinal game at the meadowlands in new jersey. it was italy versus bulgaria. a friend literally dragged me to the game. i did not want to go. it was like 100 degrees. we took the bus. it took forever. i walked into the stadium that day. i thought it was the most amazing spo

when he got his undergrad and then he went to columbia for a masters in economics and then university of chicagotudying under milton friedman receiving his phd. about the sixties and seventies teach at amherst and brandeis and ucla and cornell and in 1882's length —- joining the hoover institution. >> if there were no hoover institution by the mainstream university hired him? [laughter] >> time could have worked any college or university he wanted to. he turned down offers university of wisconsin, he could've gotten tenure and worked in any economic department. he was quite talented scholar in his discipline before he ever began writing about racial controversy. just the academic publication which surpasses those in the field. where he ran into trouble is that college administrators that i think part of the problem was thise was the 1960s and higher education was changing you had a woman gay rightsment and and all the things were coming together and it's a different generation but they intended to teach the way he was taught. that was harder in the sixties and became very difficult to do and the

you should university of chicago, cherry gurneys her. but when you the garden, you say you don't rush it or, or you see on the view of her so much for her. oh, at this spot in 2017 polish authorities freed vietnamese slave laborers from a sewing factory. among them were children. i shall per farrell. crazy. oh yes. there is polish. such a jammed churches are g references, g, g, g, occasionally gradual. natalie, she told us, all right. talk you talk to you today. you shall she brussel, you. russia. you actually started a new hold. you go to court. experts in criminal law define human trafficking, as when people lose their identity and handled is good. but the best, the loudon from the german criminal investigation office says these people have been smuggled not trafficked because they know they'll have to work to repay the cost of getting to europe the criterion for mention the hunter in context, troy song. didn't emily give higher ones? one of our women nourished, a food stay integrated, deposition and physician, and i'm sure on snaps wor

that you credit credited by phd to the university of chicago. it was actually from northwestern at since. we're such rivals, you know hyde park versus evanston. i feel like i have to say in fact, i was on the north side not in hyde park whereby brother was a grad student at the same time when i was but anyway, but i'm really happy to be here at the hermitage as you said, i'm really a neighbor up the street in old hickory village and have visited the hermitage. before but i really i don't think of myself as an expert of the hermitage i've written more about. other presidential houses, so really going to focus on those they're earlier examples, but i feel like they give you some background some ways of thinking about the building which is in our backyard here. so let me begin i'm told that the response time of the clicker is very slow. there we go. okay. so i begin here with a group of four buildings all of them associated with. us presidents so we have monticello which you know mount vernon the home of george washington montpelier also in virgini

foreign policy experts of the highest degree, even at the council on foreign relations and the university of chicago have said not at all to justify putin's war, which was illegal and an aggressive war. but you notice how they always say, like, it's just built in, like some email went out. i didn't get it. but we've all been instructed, have to call it russia's invasion of ukraine. well, that just gives the whole game right there, doesn't it, that it was everything but unprovoked, but they don't want to talk about how provoked it was. their responsibility for provoking, and they really have, especially since bush and through obama through trump, who after all trump was absolutely falsely accused of being a russian stooge. but then how do they react to that? in fact, donald trump jr even said, look, we're pouring these weapons into ukraine so now you can't call us pro russian traitors, right? so ended up taking a very harsh anti-russian posture in order to prove what pro-russian traders they weren't when that was unnecessary anyway. and now, you know, massively escalated bombers that go, you know, 12

giant dish i should have period of cisco milligan, mosquito frontal, regular garden use, your university of chicago chevy guarantee, sir. but when you the garden, you say you don't rush it or, or you she arms a video of her so much for her. oh. at the spot in 2017 polish authorities freed vietnamese slave labor is from a sewing factory. among them were children. i shall portfolio crazy. oh, yes. there is polish touch of yan protected energy references g g, g, g. i usually go natalie, she retired for us. all right. talk you talk to you here today, charlotte brussel, you really gotcha. gotcha. started here that they're gonna be charged together to hold you to hold and gotten experts in criminal law, define human trafficking as when people lose their identity and a handled is good. but the bassi loudon from the german criminal investigation office says these people have been smuggled not traffic, because they know they'll have to work to repay the cost of getting to europe the criterion for mention the hunter in context, troy song. didn't emily give her? not one of our women missed a food stay integra

i should have period of cisco milligan escrow filtering in regarding new sure. university of chicago cherry guarantee sir. but when you look on your show, you talk about it or, or you see on the bill, you of her so much for her. oh, at this spot in 2017 polish authorities freed vietnamese slave labor is from a sewing factory. among them were children. i shall portfolio crazy. oh yes. there is polish touch of jammed churches. are you referencing gigi, gigi, gigi, fusion nuclear, natalie, she told us, all right, talk you talk to you. hey today, charlotte, you brussel your russia. you actually started here that they would all be charged together to hold you gold and cotton. experts in criminal law define human trafficking, as when people lose their identity and handled is good. but the bassi loudon from the german criminal investigation office says these people have been smuggled not traffic because they know they'll have to work to repay the cost of getting to europe. the criterion for mention the hunter in context troy as long since im legal for one of our women nourished a food stay i

was the last point i made i guess i'll try to remember it, but you wanted to ask about the university of chicago now, does that mentioned already? i i'm no neither of us has mentioned that okay, but you're familiar with it and and one of our an audience member asks or points out a study that shows that renewables are more expensive is the 2019 university of chicago epic study. are you familiar with this study? this was directed to professor deathler, but if both of you are familiar, we'll start with not i'm not familiar with that study. so yes, i am familiar with that study. i think these studies tends to be way too conservative. so we have to keep looking at things. so one thing is the ability to like solarwind because they're unreliable like replacing the first 10% is cheaper than replacing the second 10% replacing the third 10% so what you're doing is you have to add more and more of this unreliable infrastructure to get a larger and larger percentage, but you need the whole unreliable infrastructure as well. so if you look at a place like texas, they've already spent about seven seventy bill

i finally got to the university of chicago for three years, i didn't even dream about it. chicago city gangster woman congratulations. just don't tell anyone about it just yet. okay, so as not to get off. ok then. what's next? then we all get visas and immediately fly to me, because in a month we have to start. i took an apartment here and there is a good school nearby. what are you dad? you're not happy, very happy. of course it couldn't be found. i didn't know it was a choice. i live next door. what about yours? helena beautiful did not keep company understands her ex are you jealous no? everything is serious. why did you come here as if you don't know how our chance meeting in bars ends. than on each other, then wake up together, then i'm a coach, you're a player everything is as always. look. you will have tea. hello, i’ll go, perhaps i’ll pick up my things. max look, let's talk calmly, i can't kick him out. now she will finish her tea, and i will take him to the hotel . there is no need to send anyone anywhere, let us spend the night here with whom tomorrow we play in

and i got to i got to brandeis and university of chicago, and those are the ones i applied to the abc, you know, and i had to make a decision very quickly. and i got into brandeis. then i decided to go there and i never got the car, which is kind of neither here nor there, i guess. but now looking back on it, i don't know why that didn't happen, but i liked brandeis, and of course it ended up being a, you know, a blessing for me because i was able to meet morrie there, and it ended up affecting my life in a way that i never knew it would all these years later. well, selling a book, 18 million copies of a book, having it on the bestseller list for 350 weeks in a row that's got to be a life changing event. besides just the the money that comes with that. oh, yeah. i mean, but not maybe in the way that that you're thinking. first of all, as i say, i never expected the book to do a whole lot. then once it started to become popular, well, from a money point of view, first of all, i gave the money that we got for doing the book to tomori. and when we started, that's the advance money that y

intellectual sparring partners so was milton friedman who was the advisor to the goldwater campaign university of chicago with that income maintenance experiment if he was homeless. and it was a bipartisan idea. >> and then in the 68 campaign that was campaigned on but then when the time came to vote, mccarthy did not support it but then it was richard nixon. >> that's like being verse today and you just don't want to give credit to the other side or the liberal side. >> referred to as our monument and that is how seriously he took this and how disappointed he was. >> our monument and this is what they will remember us by and then he said i had to be members of the cabinet but i'm doing it because i had my doubts. >> with his own congressional relations liaison to congress. >> two very quick things what is the christian working man's anti-communist rivers and harbors act of 1969 quick. >> is a name the department of health education and welfare conjured up to appease the secretary who was worried about the nixon idea being called the negative income tax. so the staff cooked it up one more time. >> christ

. >> joining us for analysis, of the former federal reserve governor the university of chicago.alk about this. ecb just gone 75. we on track for another 75 from the fed? >> i think it's very likely. a similar message given a jackson hole. other fed speakers, out saying they would be comfortable with 75 obviously this can be some more data between now and the meeting, but i think they are on track for likely 75 rated alix: if that's the question is -- is the right question to be what happens in october and november. what do you think? >> that's exactly right. the thing to do is look at the past where they will get to because that's where they will hold for a while. the other message reiterated, they will keep going till the job is done. it's knocking to be a quick pivot down. inflation will hopefully be becoming down -- will be coming down. i think we get closer to this target but not at the fed target. the hold rates in the 4% plus range for much of 2023 to make sure inflation stays down. guy: what does staying down look like. we've got gas prices coming down , or to be looking

of what is going on here, so many cities across the country, the giant so-called liberal universities who always talked aut racial justice and diversity, equity, and inclusion -- whether it is the university of chicagoia university new york, north philly, johns hopkins of baltimore -- they are all gentrifying the neighborhoods around them and pushing out more black and brown residents. >> and poor people. let's be real. these are poor black and brown, poor white. these are persons who get a subsidy for the rent. this and community was disaced years ago a now they're trying to displace them again. universities out there like drexler should be ashamed of themselves. they should be a model community. they should talk about how children can go free to the schoolrather than how to displace them. we know pennsylvania is working on a minimum wage, get to work 300 hours we just afford a basic two bedroom apartment. no 2.5 million worrs make under $15 an hour. what we know is these tenants, 11 months of tenant organizing. they had a 31 day protest encampment in july. now fortysomething faith leaders have signed on post of the mayor said, i'm not going to meet with you. they're calling on the state senator to

that is after friedman left teaching in the 70s after he won his nobel prize and left the university of chicago he set about writing popular books that would be read and understood by leaders and people who were not economists are intellectuals. he did a lot of speaking on college campuses and elsewhere. he felt the role of a scholar of an intellectual was to explain your discipline to people who were not used to the discipline. and sowell really followps that model. he said in plainspoken prose for everyday people. a lot of people complained when he give us -- a few years back. even after tom left teaching her was still teaching at the college and at the time he was the best professor let people had even if he never went to college. i think his thoughts were modeledev on what friedman had done. this go he studied under a persuasive left-wing economist do you think he would have turned out differently? >> guest: no, probably not. sowell is very much his own man. he was not indoctrinated by friedman and were another nobel prize-winning economist that he studied under in chicago. he studied under

the polls were run by the national opinion research center, the university of chicago, one of the leading nonpartisan polling organizations in the country, and the results were quite remarkable, and here are some of them. 80% of americans across the political spectrum said that without our rights, america aka is nothing. rights today are not secure. but americans have more in common than many people think. now, that's a remarkable and complex set of views that were expressed on the front end of our poll and in many of our national town hall meetings. it seems to fly in the face of all the polarization that we see in the country today and in a moment. and later on in the in our discussion, i think will address that. but sticking with the polls, when we dig into the polls we find that they really suggest there's a possibility of bridging political divisions by, focusing on shared values, the shared values of equal rights. a majority of americans agree that rights actually include responsibilities. they are not simply freestanding rights that exist for individuals groups. but there are broad

and then is the 2019 university of chicago directed to the professor. >> i am not familiar with that study. >> im. they tend to be way too conservative. so the solar and wind facing the first 10 percent is cheapening on —- cheaper than replacing the second 10 percent or the third 10 percent if you have more unreliable infrastructure foror a larger percentage but you need all of that as well so texas spent $70 billion to get a 21 percent consider the 75 percent three.five times to spend on the new money on infrastructure and an important point is a drives up cost to the find resiliency. it is subsidies and mandates for unreliable electricity and not one person in this room would pay the same amount from a lot reliable and unreliable employee it is total corruption not even talking about the 80 percent of energy in the billions of people for the idea that solar and wind can justify rapidly beginning fossil fuels with no cost is a murderous farce. >> the nation's second most populous state and like i understand is and that's what's driving this? >> the way the texas grid works is that i

and here is what university of chicago professor john mearsheimer says, this is already happening today a situation that, for example, in 20 years china will enter into an alliance between canada and mexico and station and troops in canadian and mexican territory. and we'll just watch with words. it's not a problem. we are progressive people of the 21st century, only old-fashioned people like vladimir putin would be worried, naturally, this is impossible. and i repeat, when ukraine joins nato, the missiles will be located 39 km from our city of belgorod and 4 minutes of flight time from moscow. but this may not worry us, but in the meantime. this nazi epidemic is spreading in all directions in all areas of life. it is necessary that the paralympians, who have been preparing for the olympic games for 4 years, do not allow these players to russian cats, they do not allow them to any exhibitions. and they reach the point of absurdity they are forbidden to stage chekhov they are forbidden to play tchaikovsky, so the singers netrebko and the conductor gergiev demand that they abandon their h

the group also gave low scores to the university of pennsylvania, georgetown, and skidmore college. the university of chicagous free-speech. meanwhile there are some alarming numbers on freedom of expression. in a survey of more than 40,000 students and finds that 2% of campus conservatives often feel they cannot express their opinions freely but only 13% of liberals and 23% of moderates feel that same way. currently these numbers are devastating for academia in my opinion. >> carley: yes and i think the single greatest example of intolerance on college campuses was when the yale law students protested the debate that included the conservative speaker. i believe they shut that debate down. they are law students. their job will be to debate and listen to another side of an argument that they disagree w with. i went to college between 2005 and 2009 and i didn't have to deal with any of this. people say college is for many decades have been liberal institutions and that's true, it seemed like it was much more contained. now it's becoming a much more open thing where you talk to young people today and i have. a

when joe and i did these numbers for the university of chicago, we added questions on the survey just for the heck of it to see what response we would get and it scared the shit out of us. these are scary numbers. when you talk about potentially democracy being at stake, do not think that is an understatement. >> i will ask them to flip forward to a set of numbers. >> can i throw one thing in here? just about the congress versus the country. i do not disagree that individuals in their own hearts and minds are getting more and more polarized. i would say that the function of government is very different in congress then at the state level. they have to get things done. at the end of the day, they have to pass a budget. there are only a few states in the country, illinois being one, that have defied that. they live in some endless monetary morass. but, most states actually function and literally go from step to step and get things done. often the governor is not of the same party as the legislature. i do think congress has a particularly frozen and dysfunctional look to most of the coun