i'm joined by my guess why petro in kingston is a professor of political science at the university of rhode island in delmar. we have scott ritter, he's a former intelligence officer and the united nations weapons inspector and in brussels. we cross the gilbert doctorow. he is an independent political analyst and historian or a gentleman cross hoc rolls. in fact, that means you can jump in any time you want and always appreciate it's got a nickle i 1st nickel. i mean it's, it's very interesting watching the who's winning and who's losing a game on cable tv. a plethora of articles always in the, in the main broad sheets. but there seems to be preciously little interests and how to end the conflict. that doesn't mean to say that things aren't going on. there's a plan, there's, there's a of a format in bare room though. when sam ball, i'm covering it very weak watching it very, very carefully here. but it doesn't seem to get a whole lot of play. and all it takes is a secondary se, blank and say, well, we're not, we don't think the russians are serious. and then there's no discussion any further . how

he is a professor of political science at the university of rhode island in delmar. we have scott ritter, he's a former intelligence officer in the united nations weapons inspector and in brussels. we cross a gilbert doctor arrow. he is an independent political analyst and historian or a gentleman cross cycles. in fact, that means you can jump in any time you want. and i always appreciate it's got a nickel. i 1st nick, like, i mean it's, it's very interesting watching the who's winning and who was losing a game on cable tv. a plethora of articles always in the, in the main broad sheets. but there seems to be preciously little interest and how to end the conflict, but doesn't mean to say that things aren't going on. there's a plan, there's, there's a, a format in bare room though when it's damn ball. i'm covering it very weak, watching it very, very carefully here, but it doesn't seem to get a whole lot of play, and all it takes is a secondary se blank and say, well, we're not, we don't think the russians are serious and then there's no discussion, any further, how do

why petro in kingston is a professor of political science at the university of rhode island in delmar. we have scott ritter. he is a former intelligence officer in the united nations weapons inspector and in brussels. we cross a gilbert doctor arrow. he is an independent political analyst and historian or a gentleman cross cycles. in fact, that means you can jump in any time you want, and i always appreciate it's got a nickel. i 1st nickel, i mean it's, it's very interesting watching the who's winning and who's losing a game on cable tv. a plethora of articles always in the, in the main broad sheets. but there seems to be preciously little interests and how to end the conflict. but doesn't mean to say that things aren't going on there. there's a, there's, there's a, a format in bare room though when it's stand bowl. i'm covering it very weak watching it very, very carefully here. but it doesn't seem to get a whole lot of play. and all it takes is secretaries. they blinked and say, well, we're not, we don't think the russians are serious and then there's no discussion any further . how

for a d lot of different instances and so for example the justice give a speech of the university of rhode island which is a public university she and reported her travel and her financial disclosure reported recent freedom of information request of the state of rhode island saying that did you all pay for her trip and until it turned out they did and so you need to put it on your financial disclosure report and so she's working on fixing at ten similarly for all the supreme court nobody's come up republican and democratic predict have the information reports from kavanaugh and others and barren it just became on the obama shortlist and freedom information request from him but for judy thomas yes, only likely that she sent messages to the white house but is possible that she sent time to messages and e-mails to doj officials we know the department of justice officials jeff clark is the guys name and specifically, who's also been involved in attempt toto overtun the election so when see how deep that conspiracy rent and potentially mention it her husband on that i thank you so just due diligence t

the justice sotomayor example, she gave a speech at the university of rhode island, a public university, and did not report it -- or travel -- on her financial disclosure report. we sent a request to rhode island saying did you all pay for her trip and hotel and it turned out they did. so that is something you need to put on your financial disclosure report. she is working on fixing it. similarly for all of the supreme court nominees, both republican and democratic, we sent information reports for kavanaugh, for gorsuch, for the chief judge who just became it in the fourth circuit. virginia thomas, it is not only likely she sent tax messages any most of the white house but it is possible she sent text messages and emails to doj officials. we know that the department of justice officials, jeff clark is the guy's name, specifically was also involved in this attempt to overturn the election. we want to see how deep that conspiracy ran and potentially she mentioned or her husband on that, i think it is due diligence to see to what extent ginny was in touch with members of the trump administ

she gave a speech at the university of rhode e island which is a public university and she didn't report it. she didn't report her travel on her financial disclosure report we sent a freedom of information request to the state of rhode island did you all pay for justice sotomayor's trip to a hotel and it turned out they did . that's something you need to put on your financial disclosure report so she's working on fixing it . similarly for all the supreme courtnominees, both republican and democrat . they filed a freedom of information report for kavanaugh font, for dorset. chief baron was on the obama shortlist, we're still waiting on freedom of information requests for her but jenny thomas, not only is likely that she sent text messages and emails to the white house but it's possible she sent text messages and emails to doj officials and we know that the department of justice officials jeff clark is the guys name. specifically was also involved in this attempt to overturn the election. so we want to see how deep that conspiracy ran and if she sees her husband on that. i think it's just

the justice sotomayor example, she gave a speech at the university of rhode island, a public universityd not report it -- or travel -- on her financial disclosure report. we sent a request to rhode island saying did you all pay for her trip and hotel and it turned out they did. so that is something you need to put on your financial disclosure report. she is working on fixing it. similarly for all of the supreme court nominees, both republican and democratic, we sent information reports for kavanaugh, for gorsuch, for the chief judge who just became it in the fourth circuit. virginia thomas, it is not only likely she sent tax messages any most of the white house but it is possible she sent text messages and emails to doj officials. we know that the department of justice officials, jeff clark is the guy's name, specifically was also involved in this attempt to overturn the election. we want to see how deep that conspiracy ran and potentially she mentioned or her husband on that, i think it is due diligence to see to what extent ginny was in touch with members of the trump administration i