in reviewing it, you delivered it to one of your former employers, and you delivered to him unredacted information beyond what this committee received through our request. would you give to was in the same unredacted formed everything, i repeat everything, that was responsive to mr. markey? >> absolutely. as you know, we have provided a large number of documents. >> i appreciate that, but providing documents less productive than we did, i have no problem with this being placed in the record, but in order to make the record complete, we would need to have the same information, which we do not have today, and quite frankly, we expect normally that what is redacted is redacted for good and proper reasons, and there should be no reason whatsoever unless there are demands for unredaction, so if you say that, i withdraw my reserve. >> i think the chair for putting that in the record, and i think we should be able to receive additional information. >> i think members on both sides. >> i can only speak for the documents that were in my possession. some of them may have been provided by other m