so chambers set up his own polling site unskewed polls.com where he unskewed all the national polls by skewing them in favor of romney, and surprisingly found that mitt actually had a nearly 8 point lead. that doesn't even count the margin of error. and given how many errors romney's made, i think he should get all of it. now no surprise, folks, this feels accurate polling has caught the attention of some gop intellectuals like texas governor rick perry who tweeted, always niles to get unfiltered or in this case unskewed information. amen. if we had only had more accurate polling during the primaries, perry could have dropped out way sooner. (applause) and so-- (laughter) folks, chambers' work throws all polls into doubt now. even the internal ones i've taken of myself. i mean the results say i'm not that excited about mitt romney but as a conservative i feel like i should love him. maybe the sample size is too small or maybe i checked the wrong box and i'm actually latino, you know. thankfully, fox news is fighting back with its own fair and balanced polling. >> we asked you tonight w

instead, the unskewed polls that the guy from the unskewed polls credits the change to, actually, to himself. he writes quote, i suggested last week that the pollsters will become more concerned about their credibility and would straighten up and fly right, so to speak. they have. sounds like everyone on all sides of the aisle needs to take a deep breath, get a little perspective. cornell belcher, as you heard from a moment ago, suggested we all wait awhile for the numbers to settle. ari fleisher last night told me he takes the latest good and bad news for his side with a grain of salt. >> the previous pew poll was ridiculous. it had a ten point democrat turnout advantage. not going to happen. this one has a five point republican advantage. as much as i'm a partisan republican, i have a hard time believing that, anderson. >> ari saying both polls have been skewed over the last couple weeks. pundits, whether sensible, silly or somewhere in between, never have the last word. voters do. tonight in swing states across the country, potential romney voters have been riding high, and yes, f

nate silver tweeted unskewed polls argument.there. i'm sorry. but i love that -- far left turns to nate silver for wisdom on the polls. yes because he's generally right. right. while many conservatives look to former -- clinton political consultant dick more toys understand the polls. dick, there is a difference. dick morris has always been wrong about everything. >> as evidenced by his book "condy versus hillary". >> i was completely right. >> stephanie: i'm sorry. that was supposed to be the 2004 race. absolutely. >> 2008. >> stephanie: right. 2008. yes, that was supposed to be the race. what does he say? his current predictions of the presidential race look favorable to the incumbent. yes. nate silver is a man of very small stature. thin with a soft sounding voice. sounds exactly like the mr. new voice used by rush limbaugh on his program. he claims to have been highly accurate in predicting the 2008 election results. >> he was highly accurate. >> stephanie: they say and perhaps he was. >> perhaps. >> stephanie: there's no pe

. >> well, if you're curious for another taking to unskewed polls.com which is an attempt to reweight the polls. >> an attempt to reweight the polls. when the polls were particularly dire for the republican presidential candidate mitt romney in the election, presidential election polling this past month conservatives decided these polls showing an american electorate that is choosing president obama over mitt romney, these polls made them feel so uncomfortable they decided to develop a new fantasy electorate that they would poll in theory and their fantasy electorate which is not the real electorate would give them a much more comforting list of results in terms of their fake polls. it was the same dynamic at work when they invented conservative-a-pedia. something you read about the world on wikipedia, if it makes you uncomfortable as a conservative, conservative-a-pedia is guaranteed to only contain information that makes you feel okay. if you are discomfited by the idea the human species is a result of millenia of evolution for example conserve-a-pedia has you covered. not only has

. >> can we show the unskewed version of that poll?> even at 18%. >> i think the problem for mitt romney, it isn't women's issues, it's also medicare. more women than men are concerned about taking care of their parents, and i think just the overall gamut of issues sort of favor the president with women, and i'll tell what you, mitt romney could only overcome a gap like that with women if he had a comparable gap among seniors. i think when you combine the gender gap with now the shrinking age gap, problems for romney. >> okay. well, krystal, to joy's point, mr. romney is increasingly relied upon his wife to connect to women. take a listen. here she is. >> this is the mitt romney i know, and let me tell you about what a fantastic guy he is. >> i love you women. >> should you not be questioned about your finances? >> we have been very transparent to what's legally required of us, but the more we release, the more we get attacked. >> there you go, krystal. she's obviously convinced you, she loves you, she used her hands effectively. >> sh

the unskewed right wing movement was every poll that doesn't show romney winning is wrong.nal poll in america that shows that. my point was that poll was central to the narrative. undecided voters, biden crushed. cnn, if it was any kind of normal -- use of the poll, he would have won. the next day reuters. they were a little slow, i guess. he won. and let's not forget that fake cnbc poll which was a big deal online and in the chatter. also sort of mucked up the narrative because oh, ryan won the cnbc poll. it was a click through reader survey where the results changed every five minutes. it wasn't a poll in any way shape or form. so i think biden sort of got the short end of the stick and i think there was you know some confusion or some people using smoke and mirrors to try to suggest that ryan won that debate. >> stephanie: absolutely. if it was even close. like i say when you take people that don't have a dog in the fight, undecideds, he crushed him by 20 points. >> tweeted the next morning to my conservatives who follow me on twitter if ryan won the debate, he wouldn't

>> thank god i don't need to unskew the polls today. >> nobody here thinks the polls were rigged rightigged. >> the other thing though is this town hall format is way different. a lot of people say it plays to president obama's advantage. president obama's got to change gears, take a lot of different tactics and ready for this moderate mitt and mitt romney knows president obama as you said is competitive and going to try to come back. and that changes the game. >> one advantage that president obama has this time frankly is that the expectations game has gone top si ter vi. people were expecting him to do extremely well. this time if he's able to show up articulate a sentence smile every few minutes he's going to do better than last time. the expectations have changed. >> but the challenge for obama and this goes back to the point you were making, right. i think it's true obama has great communication skills in certain settings in certain days. but he's always struggled with this personal connection. >> i do think the president does quite well in a town hall format, i think much more so

-- you unskew them? >> you go. >> i have very strong opinions. >> should i explain this for the audience? we're talking relegation that some polls skewed, were showing obama and had when they were not, some are adjusting the polls. they refer to a choose your own adventure campaign -- you can decide who is ahead and behind, you can have your own debate winner. yesterday i saw a video where you could even rearrange the debate to have the argument go the way you wish. >> they have a subsidiary research were you could go online with a credit card and give them your credit card, write a question, and it will be asked in a robopoll next night. i am not sure why i decided to bring that up. anyway, here is the common sense -- cherry picking. people who think they go for the one poll that tells them what they want to hear. that is the most accurate -- any other poll is obviously methodologically flawed. the cherry picking is there. the other one is the worst -- the latest poll must be the truth. even if it is in

now when you refer to what polls are saying, is that before or after you unskew them?c-span audience. we're talking about that the polls were skewed, they were showing obama ahead when he wasn't and there are websites now hey justing the polls. jonathan martin of politico referred to it, choose your own adventure campaign, where you can decide who is ahead, who is behind, you can make your own poll, have your own debate winner. actually yesterday i saw a video going around where you can even rearrange the debates to have the argument go the way that you wish. >> and actually, rasmussen has a subsidiary pulse research or something, where you could actually go online with la credit card and give them your credit card, write a question and it will get asked on a robo poll the next night, which i'm not sure why i even decided to bring that up, because i probably shouldn't have, but anyway, here's sort of to me the common sense. number one, cherry picking. people who think that they go for the one poll that tells them what they want to hear and that's obviously the most acc