quite frankly untruths told about one another. if we understood the common history and the proud places from which we come, much of the violence and conflict could be avoided. she has done a number of presentations around the city and state. angela chan. officer lowis borilla. she took a particular interest in working with youth and with schools. she was a sro , school resource officer. during that time, she worked with middle schools throughout the district and in many areas where they were experiencing violence. she has been an invader. i would like to acknowledge captain masha ash. captain ash has done a tremendous amount of work. she worked on protocols that would work with children taken to the youth facility. during the parent's arrest and from trauma. thank you very much officer pri lo and captain nash. i am going to go over the panel discussion. we are try find solutions which includes violence to and from school and on the site. our goal is to move forward solutions. we ask that all questions be reserved today end. please

when your department, the district attorney's office discovers an office -- an officer has been untruthful or is abusing power, do you have a policy in place for reporting this? or is there just an understanding, or how does your office deal with this? >> i also think everyone for having me here today. i could not agree more with the panelists to spoke before me. i say this to young lawyers all the time in our office. all we are is our integrity. all we are is our ability to communicate and put forth evidence to juries, and we have to rely on that. we have to rely on integrity. it is difficult when these situations happen. i was really involved with the crime lab cases and the allegations against the criminals. i've been very involved in the allegations regarding some of these search and seizure issues, and i am just now becoming involved with the cases of potential theft. and all these are allegations. what is difficult, i think, for prosecutors in our office -- we find folks to be very reactive to these situations. the response often is if officers are not being truthful, that we need to

but there were others who were persuaded to do it vote the other way and it was on the basis of an untruth a lie now we haven't had the report of the inquiry into it you to be out soon but all the evidence is saying it was an attempt made to deceive or deliberately deceive the british people and to deceive. decided and agreed with bush that he delivered britain into the war with the evidence wasn't so it was manufactured it was created simply bits of evidence were exaggerated and starmap basis we send one hundred seventy nine british citizens to die in a war that was invading and i believe that will be the decision of history and britain has to come to terms with that and i believe the reputation of those who are responsible for perpetrating that ally would be gravely damaged when the full information is available you know why this does this really make any difference to british interventionism in general that given the ongoing backdrop of the bombing of libya and boots on the ground in afghanistan you know. i think up to the point of going into iraq for the second war british intervention

seamlessly and we're going to rejoin the audience concerned predominantly about being criticized by these untruths about lawsuits and curator instead. driven by i will guard standing by people powerful enough to push. the case forward let's talk a little bit about you and what you are going through at the moment you are currently fighting extradition to sweden what are your fears should you be extradited that the problem is in two parts. united states is trying to get up an execution case for me can the united states. just today we see a new subpoena coming out of the secret grand jury that is operating in alexandria virginia is trying to get our planes espionage claims against them. he is. building that case around whatever country i mean once decides to indict they will try to extract me from that country. possibly not there's any possibility i witnessed them. and the other problem with the sweet expedition is that the process itself has been corrupted. so he was corrupt from the very beginning and we've seen corruption that's why his media we've seen. all sorts of strange actions in relation to

of the aisle republicans and democrats and if anybody thought that he was telling the congress an untruth he certainly would have been brought before the congress and public and brought down a bad it general petraeus a strategy in iraq and a good play is already gee if somebody if somebody were to put out before p.d. ad in the newspaper the us which read this and you know what i was curious and either it was it was it was a it was a democratic it was a tenor craddick operative group called move on dot org and you know what i know about it is because i put it in the paper denouncing it in the new york times so don't say that it was the guy who united states who portrayed portray us as a liar oh it will be general rats who try to demonize him and were proved wrong so get your facts right not just not you not not just the democrat congress all true it was my duty to elizabeth you write it rather let him speak let them split speak to him let him speak i had. in the congress also the slogan were raised whether you would like to accept that what you told them. that everything today is followed

of the aisle republicans or democrats and if anybody thought that he was telling the congress an untruth he certainly would have been brought before the congress in public and brought down about it general petraeus a strategy in iraq a lefty is likely good for you the strategy if somebody somebody. put up before p.d. ad in the newspaper will us with read the sam you know what i was curious and you don't realize it was it was a it was a democratic it was a tenor craddick operative group called move on dot org and you know how i know about it is because i put it in the paper denouncing it in the new york times so don't say that it was the government when you were knighted states who portrayed portray us as a lawyer know it will be general rats who try to demonize him and work proved wrong so get your facts right not just nod nod nod just a democrat congress cultural it was my whole deal the willingness of the right rather let him speak let them split i'm speaking here let him speak on. it in the congress also if you slogan were raised whether you would like to accept that we are told that

sides of the republicans or democrats and if anybody thought that he was telling the congress and untruths he certainly would have been brought before the congress and public and brought down about it general petraeus a strategy in iraq and good for you strategy if somebody had somebody. put up before ad in the newspaper the us which read the sam you know what i was curious and he was it was it was a it was a democratic it was a ten a credit operative group called move on dot org and you know what i know about it is because i put it in the paper denouncing it in the new york times so don't say that it was the government is we who united states who portrayed portray us as a liar know it will democrats who tried to demonize him and were proved wrong so here to facts right not just not you not not just a democrat congress pulsatile it was my usual the leaders of the right rather let him speak let them split i'm speaking here let him speak i had. him in the congress also this will get a little raised whether you like to accept that or you don't on the air but everything today is probably into

. >> will the prime minister join me in condemning the appalling, disgraceful, untruthful and misleadingaflet that is being distributed by the yes to fairer votes campaign, which is being chaired by the electoral reform society? the leaflet seeks to diminish parliament and therefore damage democracy, which, given the content of the leaflet, can be the only objective of the electoral reform society. >> what matters, in the week that we have left before we vote in this vital referendum, is that we get back to the real arguments about competing electoral systems. i am very clear that first past the post is simple, fair and effective and that it has worked for our country. i have to say that it is not often that i like to look out on a sea of red badges, but today it looks quite good. >> is the health secretary's job still guaranteed? he is over there, by the way. >> the health secretary does an excellent job. let me draw a little contrast -- >> order. this is very discourteous and it is very unfair. it is unfair on the prime minister and it is unfair on me. i want to hear the answer. >> let

keep going up and we're back more or less was preaching thousand and three we had a very dramatic untruth for three years second point because there was some weezer in chief we did three change i mean you could say a change in policy did anything change on the ground mubarak was still there rich sure you still stood you still there were eight there were. to give you one example hamas won in the passing authority of many many effects in iraq here in the us and also margaret a lot about history there was no hint and democracy brought the people we don't want to know you don't want a second point of view that i'm not so sure i don't want. most westerners don't want most muslims don't. but the. second point is i don't know if we have to have a consistent policy i mean in theory yes most of us have a have a policy that works everywhere but i think will be very hard to thread this. through various different countries i think it's somewhat controversial to any of the no no in between it's one of it's a very interesting point so the us should just say in the in the european union should say in na

but what h.r. 3 will do is drastically codify an untruth. it will reach into the pockets of women and prevent them from using their own money, their own private money on purchasing health care insurance which covers abortion services. this is a mass intrusion into the privacy lives of people and businesses. it should be defeated. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from new york rise? the gentlelady is recognized. mrs. lowey: later today the house will continue its extreme assault on women's health. h.r. 3 would prevent small businesses and families from receiving tax credits for private insurance coverage that includes safe and legal health procedures. allow hospitals to deny lifesaving care to women. if audited potentially require victims to prove to the i.r.s. agents they were raped. most troubling is the report accompanying the bill, radical republicans want to limit the exception for rape victims who can access full legal health services to only forcible rape victims. this bill to limit women's health services