and even untruthful. we' what's the best way to get two servings of veggies? fancy juice store? ready, go! hi, juice universe? one large rutabaga, with eggplant... done! that's not fair. glad i had a v8. the original way to fuel your day. >>> and♪ >>> and we continue our conversation on trump and the media with a look at how some outlets are reacting to the attacks from the press, having why frum's war on the media is a danger to democracy. trump's disregard for the press like clinton's is dangerous. and "the vox" we have 100 days to stop donald trump from systematically corrupting our institution. also law news, which i like. i'm off on a tangent. >> no, this is good. >> i don't remember a lot of people defending fox when barack obama spent eight years coming after us. i don't remember them talking about the first amendment implications. >> yeah. i think that you can argue there's a difference though between obama going after fox and trump talking about changing the entire way the media covers the president. criticizing fox, you know, you can disagree with ob

. >> the body cam helps because we are able to show the jury that the officers were untruthful. one of the officers says he tried to walk away. you look at the video, and he is standing in one place the whole time. >> reporter: ndria borba, kpix 5. >> bart meanwhile says its internal investigation in the case is ongoing. >>> it is 4:36. and we have a storm on the way, it sounds. >> we do. today is the calm before the storm. cliche i know but it's true. [ laughter ] >> we are a dry today. temperatures slightly cooler than yesterday. we had a nice mild day yesterday. today going to be a little cooler and the rain moves in tomorrow. could be a tough travel day for some folks. let's take a look outside at the bay bridge this morning. we'll see increasing clouds today chilly temperatures. santa rosa 32. freezing there. 40s for san jose. san francisco 40s. 49 in oakland. concord readings are not in today so we'll skip concord for now. air quality forecast unhealthy once again. yesterday, those forecast today to be a moderate day in the north bay but changed it. so once again, unhealth

the other person on that stage told untruths as well. it was not just donald trump who told whoppers. so did hillary clinton. it is a slippery slope. if you start to say i'm going to fact check and say what donald trump said here is wrong, do you have an obligation to do hillary clinton? if you're going to do it on this level -- what you consider an outrageous whopper, how about that medium whopper? i do not want to sound like burger king. you run into -- at what level do i intervene or not intervene? at some point, it stops being a debate between the two presidential candidates. marvin: i want to take a moment to remind our radio, television, and web audiences that this is the kalb report. i'm marvin kalb and i'm discussing the 2016 presidential debates with martha raddatz of abc, chris wallace of fox news, and mike mccurry and frank, the co-commissioners of the presidential debates. i am picking up the point which has been working in the underbrush to discuss a relatively new phenomenon in our public discourse. i am picking up the poin

it wasn't an untruth, actual a kind of was. but my point is that it was an appeal to emotion, and appealed to i am a reasonable god and you can trust me to be president and that made a difference. >> he was cracking a joke. >> i think he was making a comment. >> where is the truth in that? that's the kind of thing when you talk about fact checking. there's different views. >> i'm trying to get a something more serious than the post-truth of phenomenon is a very important thing that does affect our politics. i think it does affect our journalism. it does suggest that if you play with things in a skillful way, you can win over public without even laying your cards on the table. you don't have to do that because you have somehow or another gone beyond the responsibility of you laying out the truth as best you know what. do you feel, maybe you don't at all, but frank, do you feel there is any danger that we may be approaching a post-truth world? >> that's the first time i've ever heard of post-truth. i'm glad you educate me tonight

was your image — but only if you lived next door to a self—centered, totally driven, insecure, untruthfulread. have you forgiven him? it doesn't sound like it. i kid about it, but yes i have forgiven eddie. but i have never really understood a man leaving his children. i can understand leaving the woman but he never really came back around to be a very good father. so i don't particularly admire that. i mean, i have wonderful children and i am their parents. so, if you ask if i have forgiven him, i say that with a bit of anger because i have a son, that is his only son, and he misses having a good father. so when eddie left, he really left. do you think hollywood has changed a lot since those days? life is still lived out in the public glare but these days, is probably even more frenetic. 24—hour entertainment channels. you almost feel celebrities are being watched around the clock. well the world has changed, hasn't it? when i came into films, the studios owned the release of the films and then congress took that over and they could no longer release their films so than television entere

>> when it suits them they call on donald trump to stopcying things that they believe to be untruthful. but when donald trump wins the election, now they're saying no, it's the russian's fault, that the russians did something that julian asage was aligned to help donald trump. every single e-mail that was published from the podesta e-mail chain has proven to be authentic and the clinton campaign did not want to authenticate those. but they have never ever said that those e-mails were wrong or that they weren't authentic because they know them to be true. this is sour grapes is what this comes down to. >> tell me where the evidence is that russia is involved. now the daily mail had a report yesterday about this guy craig, i believe his last name is murray. and craig murray says he got them directly from a democrat who was disgruntled because bernie sanders had been cheated and the corruption at the clinton foundation and the actual e-mails were handed off personally in a wooded area. which is more likely to be true? >> look. the bottom line is, you know, there is no hard fast evidence.

no one ever says that what was release mtd the form of the dnc e-mails and podesta and hilly was untruthful or tampered with. the president, you would think if he's concerned about an election would say donna braz e brazile, cnn, somebody getting questions before the debate, this is cheating democracy. >> undoubtedly, behind the classification wall there is evidence of who the hacker was. people that i respect who have seen this evidence think it was russia. it could be. it could be somebody else. i think there are two questions. one, whatever happened one has to ask did it have an impact on the election itself. to that, i don't think there's any evidence of any influence at all. podesta may think he's an important person but actually i don't think anybody cared what was in his e-mail. the preliminary question is did russia or some other foreign intelligence service try to influence the election to break trust and confidence in the government? if that's right, this is very serious. despite the fact it may not have had an impact on the election, we cannot accept that. >> but ambassador, ther

what donald trump said is i'm not going to let people be untruthful about me and not counterpunch.k it's a grit opportunity go directly to the people and tell the truth. it's something where no one has had the privilege of doing. he can put out a tweet or it's the breaking news of any major network. he's used it to make sure the truth is getting out and that's important. >> no question about it but when you were writing his campaign and many of those tweeting would cause controversy, did you ever say, sir, you need to step away from the twitter? >> look, my job wasn't to tell donald trump what to tweet or what not to tweet. he's a grown man. but more importantly he fundamentally understands what the american people are after. when he talked about just recently not allowing the flag to be burned, i'm just saying what the supreme court has said but i know 80% of the american people agree whether him on that and he has his finger on the pulse of the american people and has used twitter. i think it's a great benefit to the candidate. >> corey lewandowski, scars and all. thanks very muc

it suits them they call on donald trump to stop saying things they believe to be insentary and untruthfulbut when he wins the election, the largest electoral landslide since the reagan campaign, they're saying it is the russian's fault, the russians did something, that julian assange and wikileaks were designed to help donald trump. the bottom line is you have pointed this out, every single e-mail published from the podesta e-mail chain has proven to be authentic and the hillary clinton didn't want to authenticate them, but they never said that the e-mails were wrong or they weren't authentic because they know them to be true. this is just sour grapes is what it comes down to. >> tell me where the evidence is that russia is involved. now, the daily mail had a report yesterday about this guy, craig -- i believe his last name is murray. craig murray says he got them directly from a democrat who was disgruntle willed because bernie sanders had been cheated and the corruption at the clinton foundation and the actual e-mails were handed off personally by american university in a wooded area. w

. >> he wouldn't tell an untruth, would you? >> reporter: no. >> thank you, doug. all righty. thanks a lot. >>> just a little over 30 hours the new mgm national harbor casino and resort opens its doors. 30,000 visitors expected on opening night. the area is bracing for a major impact from this opening. >> prince george's county bureau chief tracee wilkins joins us. what's been going on behind the scenes in the hours leading up to the opening? >> there's been a lot preparation to get this thing ready. we were just in there on monday, i can tell you the storefronts weren't quite ready yet. they had the restaurants set up and ready to go, asked us please with the pictures give them mercy on getting the last-minute things tied up. we're guaranteed it's going to be up and running and ready to go by tomorrow. p.m. >> why 11:00? >> that's what they do. they like the late-night openings. it's tradition for a casino to open late at night. >> it opens to the public at 11:00. there's a lot that's going to take place tomorrow. briefly walk us through that. >> there's going to be, tomorrow

they do also take articles from the mainstream media and just inflate their own untruths. got inspiration from elsewhere. it seems that they saw a certain fake news website in the u.s. and thought they could make a quick buck by doing so. these kids have really got to where they are or certainly the particular teenager that said they spent last weekend with. he got to where he is now by process of trial and error and seeing what works quite frankly and it does. it earned him thousands of dollars. >> is he a ringleadero training others to do this? is this just word of mouth they all talked to each other and said look what i'm doing? let me show you how to get in on this. >> certainly the size of macedonia is a town of around 50,000 people appears to have contributed hugely to the fact that it's such an unlikely hot spot. it's a case of a few teenagers dabbling in the first when word got around that they were making a lot of money. everyone wanted a piece of the action. and he said he was one of the first people to switch. that certainly spread and he said he is how hiring t

feel you need to be irresponsibly attacking them and a lot of the things on the campaign trail were untruths. it would be great if it were thoughtful, if it moved forward, if people could work on critical issues around our country. tech is the number one industry and, by the way, china is coming up rather fast and rather well catching up to us. do we want to stay on top? do we want to help create jobs, figure out what's going to happen to the future? that would be great but at the same time they had their own bully pulpit where they could have made it clear the key issues were and they didn't. they're scared and don't want to be attacked. that is very reasonable thing to say and a reasonable thing for the president-elect to do. i don't think i'm saying anything crazy when i say that. >> kara, we'll leave it there. you said you have a story coming. we'll certainly look out for it and look forward to reading it and certainly do appreciate you taking the time to call in and have this time today. >> no problem. >> the recode executive editor joining us today on that topic. >> you are entitled to

it is untruthful. it is unbelievable.ured up to raise her battered woman's self-defense claim in a murder case. it is plan "b" because plan "a" doesn't work. and it's a lie. >> jurors deliberated for 3 1/2 days. then finally, march 30th, 2016, announced they were ready. jane, supported by helen and other friends who had stood by her all along, walked to the courthouse and what waited there. >> it all appears to be in order, so i will read the verdict. we the jury in the above entitled action find the defendant, jane laubacher laut, guilty of the crime of first-degree murder. >> guilty of first-degree murder. a shock ran through the room. ron bamier, who fervently believed in her innocence, looked distraught. jane comforted him. the woman who flat turned down a deal to do six years for voluntary manslaughter was later sentenced to a mandatory 50 years to life in prison. it was a victory for dave's family. yes. but not one to celebrate. >> our faith calls us to forgive, and we do. we forgive her. >> but forget? no. not the

spouting off an untruth about refugees pouring in from all over the middle east, which is simply nothe case. that twined together with a speech on the teleprompter that sound like it came from the mind of steve bannon, his senior adviser, the america first anti-globalism ideology that has become kind of central to the version of donald trump that we now have before us. joining me now, former ohio state senator and current msnbc political analyst, nina turner, and josh barrow, senior editor of "business insider." let me start with you, david, who wrote a book on trump because i think we saw tonight that it's always been obvious there's no pivot, no changing. the man is 70 years old. he's going to be how he is. we're going to see a completely different kind of presidency. that to me was the most clear thing tonight. it will be like the campaign every day for the next four years. >> well, we're going to see a campaign of how much he loves you but defining america in a narrow way despite the occasional throw away line about all americans and one where facts don't matter. he said we have

we have to deal with these untruths all the time, jake, but the fact of the matter is, we have been waiting for eight years at a negotiating table for the palestinians to show up. prime minister netanyahu said it again and again he's willing to negotiate directly with the palestinian leadership without preconditions to reach a solution based and two states for two peoples and every time he has stuck out his hand in peace to president abbas it has been swatted away, and now this resolution comes, which enables the palestinians not only to overrun the peace process not to sit down at the peace table but to take israel to court and brand israel as an international criminal and sanction and boycott us and they're going to do that not to get a better two-state solution but to take us down. >> do you think that, is that why israel seems to be making a much bigger deal out of this abstention by the united states and the u.n. security council? the one resolution, critical of israel that obama has permitteded to happen, as opposed to the six that happened during george w. bush's administration or th

the other person on that stage told untruths as well. it was not just donald trump who told whoppers. so did hillary clinton. it is a slippery slope. if you start to say i'm going to fact check and say what donald trump said here is wrong, do you have an obligation to do hillary clinton? if you're going to do it on this level -- what you consider an outrageous whopper, how about that medium whopper? i do not want to sound like burger king. you run into -- at what level do i intervene or not intervene? at some point, it stops being a debate. between the two presidential andidates. arvin: i want to take a moment to remind our radio, television, and web audiences that this is the kalb report. i'm marvin kalb and i'm discussing the 2016 presidential debates with martha raddatz of abc, chris wallace of fox news, and mike mccurry and frank, the co-commissioners of the presidential debates. i am picking up the point which has been working in the underbrush. to discuss a relatively new phenomenon in our public discourse. it is called post-truth.

it's not unusual for the president-elect to call out the media for being biassed, crooked and even untruthfulwe'll show you how the media is returning to favor. te what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, lth liberty mutual insurance. on a perfect car, then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates. maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. and if you do have an accident, our claims centers are available to assist you 24/7. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. >>> and we continue our conversation with trump in the media with a look at how the outlets are reacts to the attacks from trump, the post writing why trump's war on the media is a war on our democracy, the denver post, trump's disregard for the press is da

we cannot keep saying an untruth that this new cold war is solely the fall of putin.e need to rethink our policy toward russia. that has been made even more impossible now with this slurring of anybody who disagrees from the official american position of how the cold war arose. the slurring began against people such as myself two or three years ago. we were called putin apologists. it moved on to even accuse henry kissinger of that and then of course when trump come along, this was a great blessing to these people who are essentially neil mccarthyites. we have his allegation that the russians deliberately -- i think there is more accident and miscalculation in history that mr. roth seems to think -- to liberally on the orders of putin hacked into the democratic national committee and not only in order to -- and here the narrative gets puzzling. the original intention was simply to throw american castracy into chaos, disrepute on the american political system. and they realize they could throw the election to trump. now we have "the new york times," that used to be a n

is hard to remember the details but on top of this most are convective villains such rely on untruthfulness would be a little naÏve on my part. this this is why try to rely much more of the other information i was going around their case at the time. for example example we have a lot of e-mail and in some cases there is show me that they were not worry us to after they completed the deal. they weren't worrying they were celebrating and described how they went out with their spouses. so that piece of information is more powerful, it's not something widely reported. if you know people are doing after you come back up, what they were thinking a little bit better time or their immediate reaction. that's it is trying to do his piece it together in a different way. >> host: the sig digestion was that i didn't want to my defense lawyer that night i went out had a party so therefore i was not really intentionally doing anything wrong. >> guest: i don't want to say intentionally but they weren't worrying about what they're doing. we all do some things that are wrong, we'll speed driving the car, we

the other person on that stage told untruths as well.t was not just donald trump who told whoppers. it was hillary clinton. it is a slippery slope. if you are going to do it on this level, what you consider an outrageous whopper, what about a medium whopper? i do not want to sound like burger king. you run into -- at what level do i intervene or not intervene? at some point, it stops being a debate. i want to take a moment to remind our radio, television, and web audiences that this is the kalb report. i am discussing the 2016 presidential debates . i am picking up the point which has been working in the underbrush. to discuss a relatively new phenomenon in our public discourse. it is called the truth. -- list truth. -- post-truth. denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaking public opinion that appeals to emotion and personal belief. bernalists are supposed to in -- we tell the truth as best we know. how did we start to get into this post-truth business? chris: there have always been appeals to emotion

it was the sausage making that was exposed but there's been no compelling argument that it was untruthful's a tough argument to make. steve, thank you very much. great reporting on this as always. we will talk to you soon. bill: income white house chief of staff, will find to findings if the leaders come to public consensus. >> he would accept the conclusions if the intelligence professionals get together, put out the report and show the american people that they are in the same page as opposed to through third parties. we haven't heard from comey. so, look, i think that these guys should be straight with the american people and come out and say it. bill: so what will they say and when would they say it and when it happens. it appears on both sides they are willing to do the hearings or file a commission or try and figure out the findings, but as you heard 25 minutes ago, the president wants this done before january 20th, we will see where that would happen? >> where was the enthusiasm where it started happen, why is it retro active, it probably wouldn't have happened at all if hillary cl

been completed by winter in the brief he went over what the gentleman's comments he's told a lot of untruths about this entire process the permit was issued a long time ago it not true we filed in 2013 but irving has been involved sins 2013 he was a structural engineer we didn't submit the plans until we had his sign off in 2013 and the spiral staircase was not allowable i met for 4 or 5 months to get he's sign off he's been fighting with the other neighbors i agreed to sign off one located with the code compliant with the possibility farther property line opposite his and confirmed in an eel part of the variance appeal we resubmitted and there was an issue with the nose he was given an extra thirty day special review period he couldn't make a comment because immediately when he heard he said no notice he met with him in 52015 he brought the plans i submitted the second time those are the last plans he approved and you know what was he doing those are the plans that were submitted he said i want additional concessions i want you to make the decks different a bay window on the first story and

there are lots of untruths that are published about us or that are on the internet.y cannot believe everything on the internet i am really surprised at those who informationof false that is being propagated and i worry about that and i really feel sorry for the gentleman who called who has fallen for that kind of fake news. that is a shame. it is too bad. host: we will conclude on that note. polly baca will be with the electoral college and is a so-called hamilton elector. thank you for being with us. we appreciate your time and perspective. guest: thank you. host: turning our attention to a massive bill that will affect our companies, the fda, medical research. a discovery called the 21st century cures. .idney lipkin will join us she is with kaiser health news. we'll talk about what this will mean to you. washington journal is continuing on this friday morning, december 9. we will be back in a minute, state with us. >> c-span studentcam documentary contest, this year we're asking students to tell us, what is the most important issue for the new congress and presiden

there are lots of untruths that are published about us or that are on the internet. you really cannot believe everything on the internet i am really surprised at those who informationof false that is being propagated and i worry about that and i really feel sorry for the gentleman who called who has fallen for that kind of fake news. that is a shame. it is too bad. host: we will conclude on that note. polly baca will be with the electoral college and is a so-called hamilton elector. thank you for being with us. we appreciate your time and perspective. guest: thank you. host: turning our attention to a massive bill that will affect our companies, the fda, medical research. a discovery called the 21st century cures. .idney lipkin will join us she is with kaiser health news. we'll talk about what today frompan later our live coverage of events happening in washington, d c and around the country. we will hear from people trying to prevent child trafficking and what the international community and do in that scheduled to start in about 40 minutes live on c-span. today, a

that is simply an untruth. they just stuck with the whole idea we've got the case made. because of chris lee. so again i was ready to vote for the settlement of the $25,000 settlement reluctantly except for the language that farrell lawyer just tenaciously insisted be in the recycle recycle a of the settlement. which talks about, as our chairman said, he does admit that farrell acknowledges he has the ultimate responsibility for the wrongful acts, but that it also says he was not aware of mr. lee's actions and that the ethics commission concurs with the f ppc's conclusion. the f ppc and did not conclude that it we should not concur with that because that is simply false. if we could get to a trial on the merits any lawyer worth their salt could have proven that was false and that farrell was up to his neck in regard to this fraudulent illegal campaign contribution that he was getting from this committee that had been set up at a been financed by his rich friends. the last thing i want to talk about is in regard to the fact as to how we got to this point to begin with. th

and he'll know you've been untruthful. and the beautiful relationship you two had will be tainted by lies and more lies. just my luck. i meet the guy of my dreams, but i die. i'll let him down gently. i know it's got to hurt, hilda but you did kind of bring it on yourself. what am i talking to a cat for? i don't have to tell brock about the paintings. i'll tell him the newspaper made a mistake. hilda spelminsky died. ( chuckling ) oh, there, there. it's okay to cry. just use this tissue instead of my blouse. oh, sorry. hi, brock. the newspaper made a mistake. ( screams ) ( screams ) okay... that's not the way he usually greets me. sorry, but brock said he needed closure so i zapped in some photos of you in a coffin. i'm so pale. you're dead. okay, stay here and lay off the magic tricks. i'll go figure out what to do. i've been thinking about it. it's going to be so weird, sabrina. i'm going to have to hide my magical powers and make up excuses for the rest of my life. you have no idea what kind of stress i'm going to be un