chertoff was a jewish rabbi with racist thoughts and the head of the criminal division of the us department of justice. he compiled a list of 19 muslim people as arab hijackers. criminal division at the us department of justice in washington and the us department of justice in those days had responsibility for dealing with all terrorist incidents. according to this report, these 19 people, led by osama bin laden, were able to destroy four passenger planes with the help of a knife. 10 years after the september 11 incident, christopher bolin wrote a book titled solving the mystery of september 11. he says that the reason why i named my book solving the mystery of september 11 was because i knew from the beginning that september 11 was not going to be solved. solving the story of september 11 has no benefit for zionists. we and the people were given a pre-prepared false story to go to war based on and it was supposed to stay that way. when i entered this issue as an investigative reporter, my goal was to try to solve this issue, but as i did more research, i realized that all decisions were made for prot

prospect facing alphabet over at their dominance of online search, in a court filing the us department of justice says that is one of the remedies that it could seek after google was found to have illegally crushed its competition in online search in the landmark ruling but in august. this case centres on google, the fact that google accounts for 90% of the search inquiries in the united states, which is similar to other countries. one of the crucial ways it does so well is more than $26 billion of annual payments it is thought to make two smartphone makers to be the default search engine on their phones. the advertising around search means in its latest results, alphabet, google�*s parent, reported a profit of $23.6 billion in the three months to the end ofjune. the us government says that is harming competitors and remedying these harms requires ending google�*s control of distribution today and ensuring it cannot control the distribution of tomorrow. let's bring in albert north america business correspondent who is watching this story for us. how real do you think the prospect is that google c

any quick find in the us department of justice says it is one of the remedies it could seek after google was found to have illegally crushed its competition in online search any landmark ruling back in august. the case centres on google accounting for 90% of such inquiries in the united states, which is similar to other countries. one of the crucial ways it does so well is the more than $26 billion in annual payments it is thought to make two smartphone makers to make two smartphone makers to beat their default search engine. the advertising around the search meant its latest results, alphabet reported a profit of $23.6 billion in the three months until the end of june. the us government says it is harming competitors and fully remedying these harms requires not only ending its control of distribution today, but also ensuring google cannot control the distribution of tomorrow. google said in a blog post the melodies were radical and would have... to go through this now i am joined by the managing director. the key question i have is can or should google be broken up? you no back to shoul

chertoff was a jewish rabbi with racist thoughts and the head of the criminal division of the us department of justice gave a list of 19 muslim people

the us department of justice has arrested a man who allegedly planned a terror attack on election dayoined now by the bbc�*s carl nasman in washington. carl, what do we know? yeah, well, on monday the fbi arrested a 27—year—old suspect, from afghanistan originally, this is over a suspected plot that would have targeted the united states on election day here. the suspect name, he is accused of planning and sympathy of the islamic state group. court documents were unsealed and point to some links that prosecutors say the suspect is linked to that group, they say he was allegedly on these sorts of platforms online that are sympathetic to the group, that he on his phone had downloaded some images and text, propaganda essentially by the islamic state, that he also had donated money to the group as well. he eventually was arrested when he tried to buy some high—powered rifles and ammunition from two undercover fbi agents. now in terms of the details of the plot itself, the suspects allegedly then in an interview told prosecutors that he and a younger accomplice were hoping to die as martyrs

like the washington post or germany says speak of the us justice department sees 32 of these fake domains. they were publishing safe, new stories like reports about ukrainian immigrants committing crimes. for example, the articles with then distributed through fake social media accounts and troll funds. speaking of 12 times, there are thousands of russian social media accounts pretending to be us or european citizens. they post complaints about local politics or claim that government is wasting money on ukraine means also use disguise. dis you meant to try and change the narrative, like ones about the most kind of shooting. we mentioned earlier, troll firms which employed click where it goes, amplify these posts by lighting and sharing the fake news, the trolls, trixie algorithms to push the content right into our feats. a confidential report by digital forensics, film troll run 6 shows lots networks flooded social media with this information ahead of the use column and election. most of these posts are pro russian in conclusion, rationalize crossing well disguised, faked content and push

any quick find in the us department of justice says it is one of the remedies it could seek after google

is being used as the department of justice. the legislative branch about a car dealer in the committee. i get lots of invitation but i've been fascinated in the amount of information available to us and what we can use, see, learn from. we generated more information on june the first 2000 years. how much information there was that we could not digest or see that causation is and what was there if we were super intelligent so folks for coming up with algorithms, i was fascinated by it. the science committee in congress which i left. we are getting a.i. stuff there. being an undergraduate, it's allowed me be in the policy conversation capitol hill in the task force for a bunch of years. three and four. the leader appointed earlier this year. machine learning masters in the democrat who majored in this in the most bipartisan thing on capitol hill. not that warm a place to work but we done everything this year together and trying to be a great role model. we've been able to bring in from the capitalist and is creators and authors. l

they imitates trusted news outlets, like the washington post or germany says speak of the us justice department sees 32 of these fake domains. they were publishing fake new stories like reports about ukrainian immigrants committing crimes. for example, the articles with then distributed through fake social media accounts and troll firms. speaking of 12 times, there are thousands of russian social media accounts pretending to be us or you p citizens. they post complaints about local politics or claim that government is wasting money on ukraine, means also use disguise. dis you meant to try and change the narrative. like once about the most kind of shooting, we mentioned earlier, troll firms which employed click where it goes, amplify these posts by lighting and sharing the fake news, the trolls, trixie algorithms to push the content right into office. a confidential report, 5 digital forensics of troll run 6 shows lots networks flooded social media with this information ahead of the use column and election to most of these posts of pro ration in conclusion, rationalize, trusting, well disguised

i appeal the us department of justice for help. i wrote a report about 20 years of anti-abortion activity at my office for the criminal of the department of justice. presented in person to joanne harris, the director, on january 1995. and at the conclusion of my report i said the classic problem of democracy is that it grants great liberties to those who hate freedom. the anti-abortion movement, especially its appropriation of legitimate religious expression for sinister and basically seditious terrorist is testing our committed to commitment to free speech. the limits in fact the use of free speech and the freedom of religion. and abortion demagogues is dangerous to the lives and liberty of many peaceful citizens. there is no deterrence at present for the anti-abortion who they do not respect either civil or criminal laws or basic assumptions of culture. there being no deterrence, civil authorities must recognize that the only protection this point is is self-defense. this a prescription for civil war. i prepared to shoot back. th

donald trump, used the department of justice, he weaponized the department of justice, in order to prevent me from putting out my first book "disloyal" and had me remanded back to prison, placed back into solitary confinement during covid. right? for what? violating my first amendment constitutional rights? you know, this case now is -- there's a writ before the supreme court of the united states. it's what judge -- sotomayor. if you think that this is just -- an anomaly, that i'm the first political prisoner held by my own country because i wouldn't waive my first amendment constitutional right. every single person that's watching this program needs to understand that it could be them next. there are no more guardrails against him especially as a result of the recent supreme court decision of presidential immunity. he will take everything to the nth degree. >> michael. i want to jump in but i think your face tells me you have like a lawyer question you want to ask michael steele. >> no, i just -- disagree with mike. i think that we are at a very interesting moment that donald trump is sti

it's not just going to be the military, it's going to be the politicalization of medicare and using the department of justice the private sector. it will be civil servants having to respond to his whims as opposed to facts and evidence. >> for you and many americans, comments like this are disqualifying or viewed as unamerican. that's not the case with his supporters. nbc news asked four of his supporters, trump supporters in arizona, if they agree with him that democrats are the enemy from within. i want to play for you what they told us. >> they're now the party of suppressing people's rights under the guise of misinformation. yes, donald trump is correct. >> they'll say and do anything in order to get in. it's all about power. >> there's no morals, no values anymore. it's a war on religion. i think they're bound and determined to destroy our country and make us like venezuela. they're going to -- they want to destroy the middle class. >> even voters who are uncomfortable with some of the things they hear from donald trump, but who support him, say -- at least what they tell us is they like he projects str

of the guardrails will be here. he will use the department of justice, he will use the irs to go after people. apparently he's going to round up undocumented immigrants in the country as well. this is such a defining moment for our country. a dark moment for our country and it makes the stakes so much more critical. >> another issue that is high stakes is the abortion issue. it's interesting, in our nbc news poll, voters were asked what is the issue you feel so strongly about you will vote for or against a candidate solely on that issue. abortion was the top response. 22%. above immigration, above cost of living even. should that worry republicans? >> well, harris is certainly using this issue. this is something she has a lot of credibility on. she was talking about it before she was even running and a huge one where she has a difference from joe biden who was really frankly uncomfortable talking about the issue. this is something voters continuously say they trust her more than donald trump on and we're seeing her push that in the media blitz. that was a huge focus of the interview with call

department of justice into an instrument of revenge, and retribution and retaliation and everybody everybody understands that. those who are terrified by donald trump and those who support it. those for him want to useent of justice in that way. a radical break over two centuries of the relationship between the president of the united states and law enforcement. so, you know, trump will do all of those things. i think it's alarming he's talking about pardoning several hundred people who were convicted of criminally assaulting federal officers, storming the capitol, and a number of them engaged in seditious conspiracy and convicted. conspiracy to overthrow the government of the united states. >> congressman jamey raskin, thank you for your tirm. >>> still ahead, the battle for north carolina and why republicans are running scared, next. ance so i saved hundreds. with the money i saved i thought i'd get a wax figure of myself. cool right? look at this craftmanship. i mean they even got my nostrils right. it's just nice to know that years after i'm gone this guy will be standing the test of ti... he's melting! oh jeez... nooo... oh gaa... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty

of our constitution. kamala harris has no problem executive branch ar spying on te american people suppressing the american people they have no problem with using the department of justiceical rival and donald trump go after her parents about the children education but labeling them as domestic terrorists. when you look at what her track record actually is, she is the one that does not believe in democracy. i've been saying for a long time, i'm not going to listen to democrats lecture us on the constitution and lecture us on democracy. because it is us, our constitutionalist rates republicans who believe in freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, freedom to petition your government but we believe in the protections of the american people that the constitution enshrines. we are not trying to wield the power of the federal government to limit those freedoms of the american people just so you can amass more power in washington d.c. and the last thing i will say is donald trump was already president. if he wanted to use the power of government to go after rivals and all the things she talks about, he would've done that already. he did not pretty respect

from the justice department to a long mosque, you might remember that the world's richest man recently announced plans to give away a 1000000 dollars every single day until the us selection 2 of ours that you know, swing states will us media and now reporting that the justice department has told mosques, political action committee or hack, that this might violate federal move mosque who supports donald trump has promoted the prize through his time to boost a voter registration inside that could decide the election. but it's rights concerns from election more experts and officials over the galaxy of the price. for more on this, i'm joining the cd by d w reporter alone. yeah. and marissa the other new good. just so you tell us more about this cash offer by a loan mosque? yes, charles. so basically this cash offer is like a loss for it. so mosques uh, campaign group which clearly supports donald trump, is asking registered voters to sign a petition. and this petition consists of basically 2 amendments. they should support the amendment of the post fall for speech and the rights to bear arms. now when you find this petition, basically you take part in the luxury and there is a re

but there's the other half of the issue is how do you actually have ai and have that used in various federal agencies including will support the department of justice. just like you saw in the first panel i think leonard set that operative hava fund et cetera ai in the beginning and very scared of it afterwards. that such is true for ai. that's true from us any technology that out there. technology as always a is either good or bad, it's how it's used and how it's employed. it reminds me of the internet in some ways because i remember when i was at the state department hillary clinton who was the secretary of state gave a speech on internet freedom and of her speech was the internet, yeah. that would be a summary. unep later after we saw abuses by governments and things that were happening in the aftermath of the arab spring, she give another speech which i think it we summarized is the internet -- so that i think the issue were facing, good and bad part of it. people who know me well know i also am a fan of cyber films which almost always dystopian and almost always the earlier ones including the first network computers took over the world called

adam schiff was doing, we do know that you have elements of the kamala harris, joe biden administration that have used the department of justice to be weaponized against their chief political rival. that is wrong. >> and so we have to be honest with ourselves as americans, that we do not want the institutions of our government being wielded against political rivals. >> but let's not talk about donald trump. you have elements of this department of justice under merrick garland that is targeted parents who are just simply concerned about their child's education, calling them domestic terrorists, that did occur. you have elements of this white house that we're spying on the american people, suppressing the free speech of the american people. that is the enemy within and so i think one of the reasons you have people like robert f. kennedy light tulsi gabbard, who have switched from the democratic side of the aisle to supporting donald trump and his campaign because they are also concerned about the quote, unquote, department of justice has also weapon the special counsel, the american appointed who prosecuted hunter biden, the pre

of police. he wanted to use the power of the department of justice and the fbi to target people who had been political and policy enemies of his. for example, mr. comey, the fbi director. andrew mccabe, the deputy fbi director. other individuals who had pressed for an investigation of his campaign, he wanted them audited. he wanted them investigated. he wanted them indicted. and in some respects, he was lobbying all of this privately. now, he's just saying it a lot more out loud. and he's no longer hemmed in by a white house counsel or a chairman of the joint chiefs of staff or a secretary of defense who told him no. mark esper told him no, mr. president, we are not going to use the national guard in the way that you are proposing. mark milley told him, no, mr. president, we're not going to have a military force used in a civilian protest situation. don mcgahn told him, no, mr. president, we're not going to use the department of justice and stop the robert mueller investigation. that's not going to happen. now, they said it in gentler ways, no doubt, than the way i'm paraphrasing it now. but what you

according to the supreme court, nothing see here can't use state of mind of the president, can't use what he talks about. what the department of justice can't use the tweets can't use a number of other things. so when repurposing this, what then? the special counsel had to do was say, listen, we're not talking about official duties. we're not talking about someone who is acting in their official capacity. we're talking about someone who was running for office that is not acting as the president, that is acting as the candidate says, jack smith conversations with the vice president, the united states, you would think kasie, they would be off limits? i hey, he's the vice president. know jack smith. he's his running mate. and as his running mate again, private conduct with respect to what he was discussing about really committing fraud against the election all the activity is relating to the various states that were in dispute arizona, pennsylvania, and michigan you name it right? all of those activities that was private haamakim by the way, the president has no role with respect to that. finally, as it related to january 6, and the lead

the use of the irs or the department of justice against trump's political enemies are against media he like. that's the thing people uses language have been doing with her in hungary or turkey or a decade ago in russia. when trump says he admires putin ordered meyers xi or viktor orban, that's what he admires. they don't have to worry about these rules and norms and laws and the constitution. i saw kelly saying in several different places, the atlantic as well as the "new york times", i saw him saying, i kept telling former president trump that i swore an oath to the constitution. my loyalty is the constitution and not to him personally. i'm loyal to the office of the president and not donald trump. he found that impossible to understand. that's not part of the way he thinks about the world. >> and appelbaum, thank you for your time. >>> why is the world's richest man pushing election lies in pennsylvania? is he actually straight up violating a law with million- dollar offers to voters? s to v? most people call leaffilter when their gutters are clogged and they notice one of the many i

rid of the congress. >> mike schmidt, my husband, wrote a story about all of the team he already used the department of justicetells the story you are telling, when trump talks about targeting the enemy from within, he already did, he pursued jim comey, andy mccabe, pursued and jailed you. when you hear the vice president make this argument, you would like that extra point to be made that it's not a hypothetical. it's real. can you tell people what it's like to be an american citizen and have your own government at trump's direction pursue you? >> there is no words to describe it. i can't believe this is the america that we are talking about. this is something you see in russia. this is something you see in saudi arabia, something you see in north korea, in china. you don't see this in the united states of america. but guess what? we do. and that's the type of government that this man is going to run. especially when he turns around and says he wants loyalty oaths taken and given to him by every single person in his administration. there will be no guardrails. so, yes, i want to see the vice president in the l

voluntarily on their own identify as non-citizens, and what-- essentially what they're asking us to do the department of justiceasking us to do is to ignore virginia law. >> so, while state officials in virginia appeal, another state also dealing with voting controversy, a conservative u.s. appeals court has ruled against a mississippi law, which allowed election officials to count mail-in ballots which are post marked by election day, but arrive after. the ruling sends the issue back to lower court for further consideration. ultimately, the matter could be headed for the supreme court. and over in battle ground pennsylvania, a criminal investigation is underway after election officials flagged about 2500 voter registration forms for potential fraud. griff. griff: boy, you know you're in the political season with so many things to sort out. cb cotton, thank you. molly. molly: that's the goal to sort it out. we're going to talk about pennsylvania, but i want to start with virginia and let's bring in fox news contributor andrew mccarthy, what's happening there. this is interesting, the executive order, a big push

reports here suggest the us justice department's head of election crimes has written to the politicalalerting it to the fact that it is against the law in the united states to pay anyone to vote or to register to vote. elon musk has said he will pick one person a day and present them with a cheque of $1 million between now and election day. in return for them signing a petition in support of free speech and gun rights. he has already presented four such cheques, three in the state of pennsylvania, one in north carolina. a key condition is all the participants be registered to vote in one of the seven key battleground states. those are the states that could determine the outcome of this election. democrats have argued that it's part of a ploy by mr musk to swing the election the way of the republicans, who he supports. mr musk and his people for their part contend this contest is open to anyone regardless of their political affiliation. and that he is not effectively paying republicans to vote. mr musk has been campaigning energetically on behalf of his preferred candidate, donald trum

the use of the irs or department of justice against trump's political enemies or media he doesn't like of thing people who use this language have been doing in hungary, turkey, or a decade ago in russia and when trump says he admires putin or ed myers viktor orban, i think that is what he admires. they don't have to worry about the rules and norms and laws and the constitution. i saw kelly saying, in several different places, in the atlantic as well as the new york times, i saw him saying, you know, i kept telling president trump that i swore an oath to the constitution. that my loyalty is the constitution, not to him personally. i am loyal to the office of the president, not donald trump and he found that impossible to understand, because that is not part of the way he thinks about the world. >> and applebaum, thanks for your time tonight. >> thank you. >> still to come, why is the world's richest man pushing election lies in pennsylvania and is he violating the law with $1 million offers to voters? that is straight ahead. i told myself i was ok with my moderate to severe rheumatoid a

from "new york times," an overwhelming majority of our respondents told us that they are alarmed about trump's potential impact on the justice departmentofficials said at the very likely or likely that a second trump term would pose a significant threat to the norm of keeping criminal enforcement free from white house influence. 39 of the respondents said it was likely or very likely, if reelected, donald trump would follow through on ordering the justice department to conduct a specific investigation. you may be think i people around him will say stop, don't do that, that people won't let things get that bad, right? it's not that simple, especially not this time. according to peter casaler, things don't go from beautiful to ugly in one step. so, they tell themselves the president has been elected and they're supposed to help him do the job as he defines it, end quote, mean the garrails we rely on to keep an autowant abe in check is only as strong as the people charged with contrary things out if. if he wanted to, he could weaponize the justice department. they list the steps he could take, all within the limits of presidential power,

>> i was with the department of justice in specific the us attorneys office for the district of columbia for 24 years and not with the fbi. >> okay. are you aware of the close connection between united states military in the fbi? >> the united states military in the fbi? >> yes. >> i am sorry. close connection meaning --? >> in hiring going to the fbi? >> i am generally familiar. why don't i ask mr. horowitz. mr. horowitz, anything in your experience indicate that the fbi has been taken over by, as they say, a dical left ideology? >> we have not found that. >> mr. kirschner, going back to project 2025, this indicates that to ensure the promotion of the presidents agenda, the fbi should ensure the assignment of sufficient political appointees throughout the dertment and throughout the doj. >> representativeyou must have read your mind because that's the very page i opened up to, page 569. >> let's talk about that then. please. >> right now don't allow liticaappointees within the fbi? >> correct, other thanthe director confirmed by the senate >> correct. right. i will get back you on that.

using now. how donald trump webinars the department of justice against his critic. ll fairness, ali, nothing says, elect me president, like using the doj to silence your critic, or potentially be all your critics. i will say, after listening to you, showing that list of all the people that donald intends to go after, i have to say, i am thankful that my name is not on it, although i do believe that he must be somewhat angry at me. >> yeah, and i guess this is the thing we have to think about, how would donald trump leverage the power of government, compared to how he did last time? he actually had people in place, in some cases, who were prepared to not go along with his schemes. a new trump presidency, he will not do that. he will not have people who are not loyalists. at this point, you've got all of government how is that going to work? what are the things that critics of donald trump will feel? >> again, why are we even making that supposition, when the reality is, he has done it before, and with the new supreme court ruling on presidential immunity, you can expe

money in the us, it's thought the some, some of the money turns up in the form of political influence. and whenever you trace whenever, for example, the f, b i, or the department of justice traces or russian influence campaign in the us, there was recently one that was exposed. the russians were paying a group of youtube, hers kind of far, right? kind of for right media company in tennessee, they were paying them to produce videos. and of course, all the money for that that campaign when via show companies that so there's a, there's an alternative financial system that is very heavily used by the world's dictatorships. and we could stop it, we could, we can put it into it, we could, we could make it impossible to have to, to found an anonymous company or to keep or to hide money anonymously. the, [000:00:00;00] the, the 2nd major difference, visionaries with a project get involved to create a future day experience that you can of india next, on the glory days of sing guarantee may be retained the secret of a charming times stands between this war attain in town. and the you know, this city hosp, the betty dunn swallowed by these heavy deserts grow weak visit logo on the

half of his preferred candidate, donald trump, who has vowed if he is elected president to appoint mr musk to lead a government efficiency commission. the usjustice commission. the us justice department what it planned to do in response to this alleged infringement, potential infringement, potential infringement of the voting laws, but it did spell out some of the penalties for breaking those laws, which include up to five years potentially in prison. king charles and queen camilla have been welcomed to the island country of samoa in polynesia in a red carpet ceremony ahead of the commonwealth heads of government meeting. the king was presented with a traditional kava drink in a coconut shell, before two women presented their majesties with ceremonial garlands, known as lei. they were also given a butchered pig, but that will be gifted back to the village. the couple will complete a day of engagements before meeting with commonwealth leaders at the end of the week. prime minister sir keir starmer has arrived in samoa ahead of the meeting. but the trip may be overshadowed — the bbc has learned commonwealth leaders are preparing to defy the uk and agree to plans to examine reparatory j

an election about donald trump taking full control of the military to use against his political enemies, taking full control of the department of justicese who disagree with him. taking full control of the media on what is told and what is told to the american public. and the opportunity here and the absolute requirement of americans is to understand that this rhetoric has not been used in this country, certainly not by a party's presidential nominee. >>> next up here we'll turn to sports with highlights from night two of the nba season, which included two former league mvps facing off. plus we'll show you the huge win for an underdog in college football, one day closer to the world series as well. all that and a check on the weather forecast when we come right back. st when we come right back here's to getting better with age. here's to beating these two every thursday. help fuel today with boost high protein, complete nutrition you need, and the flavor you love. so, here's to now... now available: boost max! ♪♪ missing out on the things you love because of asthma? get back to better breathing with fasenra, an add-on treatment for eos

of an election and violated federal law. >> it is not a purge. these are individuals that voluntarily on their own identify as noncitizens and essentially what they're asking us to do, what the department of justiceis to ignore virginia law. >> there is hard evidence to show that people skipped over of box on driver's license form or filled it out wrong and indeed our lawful citizens and they were mistakenly taken off of voter rolls. some have since become citizens since filling out the application and they say it is old. the voters thing this month cycle after cycle our elections have proven to be safe and secure and still there is a nefarious effort of state officials purging eligible citizens from the roles based on fraudulent data and dangerous lies. this is a story we can guarantee will develop not only over the next several days but possibly the next several hours with the election one week from tomorrow. speed to keep us posted. david spunt for us on that. >> john: big night in new york for former president trump. while the state may not decide the presidency it could determine another big election day prize plus that's. >> got them to stop what they have been doing time leslie which is en

rights while he used marshall's within which to come get me and to remand me back to solitary confinement. he talks about the military. just replace the military with a department of justice used a willing and complicit attorney general to do a judge alvin k hellerstein determined the federal court judge here in the southern district of new york, where he determined that the actions of president trump, the usa, bill barr, et cetera, was retaliatory. alvin also added an additional line there. forget about seeing. i've never even heard about it ever happening before. and that is, he enjoined trump and barr and the government. the doj. from further inflicting any injury to my first amendment or my constitutional rights. he enjoined them from doing it. what judge enjoins the government, the president, the attorney general from interfering with someone's first amendment or constitutional rights? >> trump has a second term and reshapes the judiciary -- none, right? this is the only branch of government you had to turn to. i want you to just give folks the background, though. this was about your book. this wasn't about the original plea. >> this was about my book. he was afraid

us to do. what the department of justice is asking us to do is to ignore virginia law. >> and the high court alsoto hear from the rnc and pennsylvania state republicans counting of lawed provisional blets even if voters made a stake. stem larr in mississippi illinois also end in the supreme court by the end of the week. ainsley over to you. >> ainsley: todd, brian is trying to hijack. lawrence and steve help me out here. how many on this side of the room have voted already. you have. how was it? was it easy. >> new york state early mail in ballot. ainsley: that's easy. how about you. >> connecticut, walk in 20 minutes in and out. >> ainsley: same with you. >> yeah. >> ainsley: where live. >> new jersey, 45 minutes. >> ainsley: worth it. >> oh yes, definitely. >> ainsley: i hear they are moving fast in new york. that's good news. what top issues? let me start with the front row. anyone want to talk about what your top issues are why you are voting this year? mary? >> education, ainsley. you know this. we have record high illiteracy rates all across our country. we have a teacher shortage. your inv

the department of justice then rewrote its indicted meant to take out acts that it decided would fit within the official core act category. and the example i use is the converse nations between trump and members of the of justice because in theory they're part of the executive branch and he is in charge of the department of justice though in practice the president is not supposed to get involved in the department of justice, which is a customary rule without the force of law that the president lets the department of justice operate in dependently. so trump avoid that customary rule. and he had direct contact with the department of justice and he wanted to name a fella jeffrey clark, who's an environmental lawyer for the department of justice as new attorney general because clark was prepared to the cases and so forth, and the department of justice wanted enter that into evidence. but in the revise that's been deleted, what is still in the revised indictment as one of the four accounts, is fake elector conspiracy and in the supreme court decision and this is quoted now in the revised department of justice indictment, there's a concurring opinio

they really believe that they are justified in this, that they're willing to use all of the power of the department of justice of law enforcement and national security, state weaponize them for political purposes, to take away our freedom. we saw 32 states try to remove donald trump the ballot. unilag literally, whether it be a small group of judges or an individual elections officer, unilag saying no, we don't think he's qualified to be on the ballot. i was so heartened to see that supreme court unanimously rejected that position and settled that as they should. but also how revealing it was to see how the democrat elite responded to the supreme court's actions. as much as they criticized donald and the quote unquote, maga republican for not having a respect for the rule law. in that ruling they said, how dare the supreme court not uphold its constitutional responsibility to democracy. i can't even explain the lack of logic in statement because there is none. there is none. and then they they say, well, because the supreme court failed to fulfill their responsibility, now we have to leave the fate of democra

penalties and is accused of harming young people's mental health by using intentionally addictive software. it's a fresh lawsuit on top of a similar case filed by the us justice departmenting a ban on x in the country after it agreed to pay millions of dollars in fines for refusing to comply with previous court orders. the platform had been banned for more than a month, after a supreme courtjustice accused x of undermining democracy by allowing accounts accused of spreading disinformation to continue posting. x's owner, elon musk, had accused the justice of censorship. mr musk has not yet commented on tuesday's decision. a british—canadian computer scientist, known as the "godfather of artificial intelligence" has won this year's nobel prize in physics. professor geoffrey hinton, shares the honour with american professor, john hopfield of princeton university, for their work. thanks for watching. hello. tuesday brought no shortage of heavy downpours to many parts of the uk, but over the next couple of days, things are going to be turning just a little bit drier — at the same time, though, as northerly winds develop, it will also turn colder. low pressure is still in cha