thank you so much scott ritter, a military analyst and former us naval intelligence officer, was in touchith us. all the very best to you good for sure. good luck. thank you so much for coming to us today, watch the anti- fake program with us in the 10th fight against the untruth that has befallen us. if you have any photos or videos that are in doubt. send to the editors of our program, we will conduct our own investigation and report the results. the first channel presents

the video evidence of the discovery of ufos leaves much to be desired, deputy director of us naval intelligence bray, demonstrating the tape to the congressman. filmed from the cockpit for several minutes, honestly he himself tried to detect an unidentified spherical object on it and would not have found it, until he got help. a spherical object flew past the cockpit in that direction, and another recently declassified video filmed from the cockpit of a fighter through night vision devices was shown. two small triangular objects were seen on it. the military is sure that this is not a game. light is not a reflection of the camera lenses or something else, they cannot explain what they saw, and unlike legislators in the pentagon, they are not in a hurry to draw conclusions about the origin of ufos - an extraterrestrial version. they are also trying to study some divisions in our governments are looking for life and places to live and have been doing this for a decade. they are looking for extraterrestrial life astraorbiologists. this is what we are part of the same government. and our task is no

us naval intelligence deputy director scott bray on how these you hv's are investigated . >> it hampers our ability to draw firm conclusions as to the intent. as detailed in the report if and when individual events areresolved they fall into one of five potentials . the natural atmospheric phenomenon, industry development programs, foreign adversary systems or the other then that allows for the possibility of surprise. we stand by those initial y results . the task force database has now grown to approximately 400. sigma the stigma has been reduced. >> this is the first time in more than 50 years us officials have prized testimony for public consumption about their investigation into you does, uavs. why are we having this hearing now? >> i think we have the technology that would allow us to detect things without any reasonable doubt at higher quality than in the past. we also course of the technology to produce objects in the sky . ththere is some confusion about it and my most important take away is the government is assessing the of identify objects seriously . and we should understan

thank you so much scott ritter, a military analyst and former us naval intelligence officer, was in touchith us. all the very best to you good for sure. good luck. thank you so much for coming to us today, watch the anti- fake program with us in the 10th fight against the untruth that has befallen us. if you have any photos or videos that are in doubt. send to the editors of our program, we will conduct our own investigation and report the results. the first channel presents rospotrebnadzor talks about the cholera epidemic, does it really threaten us? three products for a good mood ate in the morning and all day life wonderful incident at the dacha electric shock rescue program. all the most important in the program live healthy. so, friends rospotrebnadzor, our main sanitary supervisory authority issued a special order. he obliged all the diseases of russia to be ready for an outbreak of cholera, it must be said that cholera has its own history, there were indeed outbreaks of cholera. and there were epidemics of cholera; the first cholera outbreaks in russian history occurred at the begi

and it's any of us, or in fact most of us the office of naval intelligence, it was pretty consistent, caught out front for cia, they funded much of this research. and i don't know if there was a yield that they, they produce a yield for this cruel science. i don't, let's, maybe i'm wrong. i just don't think they do it might play out spectacularly in the military. so the connections would be much further down the road. it would be particularly in the iraq war and in the setting up of get mo and all of that. and by the time you get to 2001, it's already this cultural artifact. and so it is going to be picked up by by anyone for any purpose. mm. mm. in kind of people held before tunnel are not there because they stole the color. they are not common criminals in their enemy, combatants and terrorists who are b did chained for acts of war against our country. and that is why different rules have to apply to the continuity is extraordinary. if you look at a sketch of the cubicle end of the student volunteer and mcgill university, and then if you look far for 2002, when the 1st al qaeda susp

and it's any of us, or in fact most of us the office of naval intelligence, it was a pretty consistent cut out front for she i, they funded much of this research. and i don't know if there was a yield that they, they produce a yield for this cruel science. i don't that's, it's maybe more, i just don't think they do.

and it's any of us, or in fact most of us the office of naval intelligence, it was pretty consistent, caught out front for cia, they funded much of this research. and i don't know if there was a yield that they, they produce a yield for this cruel science.

and it's any of us, or in fact, most of us the office of naval intelligence, it was a pretty consistent cut out front for cia. they funded much of this research and i don't know if there was a yield that they, they produce a yield for this cruel science. i don't, i, let's, it's maybe i'm wrong. i just don't think they do it might play out spectacularly in the military. so the connections would be much further down the road. it would be particularly in the iraq war and in the.

and it's any of us or in fact most of us the office of naval intelligence, there was a pretty consistent cut out front for ca. they funded much of this research and i don't know if there was a yield that they, they produce a yield for this cruel science. i don't, i that's, it's maybe more, but i just don't think they do it might play out spectacularly in the military. so the connections would be much further down the road. it would be particularly in the iraq war and in the setting of get mo and all of that. and by the time you get to 2001, it's already this cultural artifact. and so it is going to be picked up by a by any one for any purpose.

to become part of that negative environment and it's any of us or in fact most of us the office of naval intelligence, there was a pretty consistent cut out front for ca. they funded much of this research. and i don't know if there was a yield that they, they produce a yield for this cruel science. i don't, i, let's, it's maybe more, i just don't think they do it might play out spectacularly in the military. so the connections would be much further down the road. it would be particularly on in the iraq war and in the setting up of get mo and all of that. and by the time you get to 2001, it's already this cultural artifact. and so it is going to be picked up by.

and it's any of us, or in fact most of us the office of naval intelligence, it was a pretty consistent cut out front for cia. they funded much of this research. and i don't know if there was a yield that they, they produce a yield for this cruel science. i don't, i that's, it's, maybe i'm wrong. i just don't think they do it might play out spectacularly in the military. so the connections would be much further down the road. it would be particularly in the iraq war and in the setting up of get low and all of that. and by the time you get to 2001, it's already this cultural artifact. and so it is going to be picked up by by anyone for any purpose. mm. mm. in kind of people held the animals are not there because they stole they are not common criminals in their enemy combatants and terrorists who were be detained for acts of war against our country. and that is why different rules have to apply to the continuity.

and it's any of us or in fact most of us the office of naval intelligence, there was a pretty consistent cut out front.

and it's any of us or in fact most of us the office of naval intelligence, it was pretty consistent cut out front for c i. they funded much of this research and i don't know if there was a yield that they, they produce a yield for this cruel science. i don't that's, it's maybe more, i just don't think they do it might play out spectacularly in the military. so the connections would be much further down the road.