the house has to follo house haw as well and has to issue valid subpoenas and if it isn't followed, the subpoena is they shouldn't go to the court because the courts have no role in thee impeachment. i think i pointed out that the house democrats can't say that they have just because of the provision of the sole power of impeachment that's the paramount power and in no other branch plays any role in providing the check on how power is exercised. and in addition, the house democrats have gone to court. and the case they are litigating right now, they have asserted that is a part of the impeachment inquiry. the trump administration explained that it wasn't valid as a part of the inquiry but that is the ground on which they

none of that suggests a valid legitimate policy objective. more so, the president himself and his counsel is bringing at issue the question of documents of witness. over and over again as we've heard in the last few days that the president was simply pursuing a valid, legitimate policy objective, if this was a specific debate about policy, a debate about corruption, debate about burden sharing. then let's have the documents that would show that. let's hear from the witnesses that would show that, because the documents and the witnesses that we have talked about show the exact opposite. the american people in this chamber deserve to have a fair trial. the president deserves to have a fair trial in fact if he is arguing that there is evidence, that there was a policy debate then i think everybody would love to see those documents. would love to see the witnesses, hear from them directly about what exactly was being debated. >> thank you, mr. manage are. the senator from south carolina. >> i send a question to the de desk. >> senator graham and

scientifically speaking their statements are not valid tools. to the. ukrainian investigators were the 1st to be invited since the plane was flown by ukraine's national carrier but that country now risks becoming a pawn in the game between washington and tehran so far they're hedging their bets and urging caution but. again i'd like to underline that 7 possible causes are under investigation but journalists are somehow only prioritizing one of them have said that with all sides sticking to their own stories the focus of the investigation now shifts to the black box flight recorders they could hold the key to revealing the actual cause of the crash as reinstating writer is professor of craft systems that finland's that tom for a university welcome to d.w. professor what do you make of the images that have emerged that appear to show the plane being hit by some sort of missile. good evening the images thought of say. a very striking in so much that you can say what pace to be. some projectiles missiles a climbing up to our situation and then as some form

the supreme court of india in a couple of months, and as to whether they think the legislation is validt, is something we will come to know about. about it at the moment, the matter is really in the corner of the people, and we have seen massive, unprecedented demonstrations all over the country. not just a street demonstrations, running to hundreds of thousands, maybe half a million on a couple of locations. but also in university after university, students are protesting against this law. and so, therefore i think the jury is out on this. the government is still determined. they have backtracked on the nrc, the national register of citizens, but they seem to be still insisting that this citizenship amendment act will go through. but as i said, people's opinions will matter and therefore, in the coming weeks and months when the weather gets better because the protests have been taking place in bitter cold weather, and so, if the weather is fairer, then certainly it could be to the advantage of the demonstrators. having said that, there is one point, which is this. the students have to

only two were not valid? this whole thing was not valid. >> yes, it was all invalid.t is striking we knew that the fbi and members of the doj under obama were corrupt. they were trying to destroy u.s. citizens by illegal surveillance. we thought the fisa court justices were deluded. they didn't ask who is the opposition. i think the real subtext is the fisa court and the judges involved almost eroded all support for fisa courts. conservatives who thought they were a tool are thinking it's not worth the risk anymore. it's so politicized. >> laura: weapons of mass destruction, that's all i will say. >> they said two of the warrants were invalid. they didn't make a decision on the other two. it's true. this is way too little way too late. they were informed years ago by david nunes about these problems. they didn't do anything about it. they would have acted earlier and would not put david who defended the russia-gate hoax as the person to help the department of justice clean up. >> laura: an american was surveiled with a material omission in the application. an opponent

scanner shall be interpreted to be a device that works toward validating the age and validity of the i.d. being presented. >> that's a specific type of equipment that's purchased? >> i.d. scanners is a broad term, and i think commissioner falzon's intent is something that verifies i.d., not captures data. >> so we don't want to do data storage is what the commission's proposing. >> right. that's something that the applicant can purchase. >> yeah. there's a zillion versions. >> we might say instead of having that long sentence, just a verification device. >> i'm good with whatever you guys are good with. >> and my understanding, just for the record, when i've heard the term i.d., it's very specific, and it's often understood to mean the thing that it processes. >> we can get very literal, if you want to simply leave it and state an i.d. scanner that does not score data. >> or just say permit holder shall utilize an i.d. verification device. >> that's what i like, what she said. >> i like that, too. thank you, commissioner. i get paid by the hour, so i can get very wordy sometimes. >>

he added, let me repeat here again, and has no validity. and of course, ms. hill has, because the question indicated said" fictional narrative that is being propagated themselves. the u.s. intelligence committee has unanimously determined that there is no validity to this. special counsel mueller has found it to be sweeping and systematic. but don't take our own law enforcement word for it. let's hear what vladimir putin himself said recently about th this. in november 2019 vladimir putin was overheard saying "thank god no one is accusing us of interfering in the u.s. elections anymore. now they are accusing the ukraine." let me end with that one. because that one demonstrates to me why this matters. that one demonstrates to me why anyone in the united states should matter. vladimir putin could care less about delivering health care to the people of russia, for building infrastructure in russia, vladimir putin, as many of this people in this chamber know well, because i've worked with you on this. he wakes up every morning and goes to bed every night trying t

but it told the government to respond to those challenging its constitutional validity.sts would trigger a government rethink? you arejust protests would trigger a government rethink? you are just back from india, this is one for you. yeah well, it‘s like this. the home minister is adamant that this amendment will go through. mind you, it‘s already legislation, the president has given his assent to the new law, but it hasn‘t been implemented yet. and tied to this is something that is equally controversial, which is all the national register for citizens. now, the two are intertwined. this is seen the two are intertwined. this is seen as a the two are intertwined. this is seen as a clear the two are intertwined. this is seen as a clear move the two are intertwined. this is seen as a clear move against muslims in india. what we have in india has been quite widely reported, the hindu nationalist government. their agenda from the very beginning as to — has been to impose into supremacy in india and marginalised the muslims. —— hindu supremacy. in india and marginalised the m

that's not a valid reason to not pursue litigation in the courts. and i think it is relevant to bear in mind, what sort of delay are we talking about? in the case that the house managers refer to a number of times which they pointed out, they presented as being very long and drawn out. if they issued a subpoena in april. but they did not file a lawsuit until august. by november 25th, they had a decision from the district court. it was argued on appeal in the d.c. circuit on january 3rd. for litigation, that is pretty fast. and it can go faster. in the nixon case during watergate, the special prosecutor issued a subpoena on april 18th, 1974. on may 20th -- so in less than a month, the district court denied a motion to quash the subpoena. on may 31st, the supreme court agreed to hear the case before judgment in the court of appeals. on july 24th, the supreme court issued its decision. if that lightning fast. when there is urgency to the case and there is a reason for it, there can be expedition in the courts, and a decision can be had in a timely mann

are these valid articles of impeachment. abuse of power and obstruction of congress did not meet the constitutional threshold and this it has to answer that question objectively the right way. when they do if and when they do, all of the rest of this is a moot point. the houston not do its job, adam schiff did not call the witnesses that apparently he thinks he know needed and it's too late. >> to house sit over in on articles and ascend i think we'll find that into will dispense dispense with a lot of these superfluous questions. >> are you ready to tie the security -- [inaudible] >> there was no investigation. the president has said he did not -- there was no conditionality or did sideload in fact, has right and we saw that played out as the present defense to make the case it was presumption, assumption and guesswork. so the facts of the scars remain the same in that went more security assistance for ukraine much more than during the obama administration and it was no investigation into bidens. >> what do you have to lose

special education advocate looks at this to say validation. this is everything we have been screaming about as lock as i have been involved in the district. this cac chair says we look forward to fixing this. i cannot echo the comments enough. we are at a staffing crisis right now. we are doing so much work in so many great areas with big plans and no one to implement be them. this is a perfect example. we are screening kids for dix fe dyslexia. when i write forspire to implement with fidelity in slide six with fidelity, that is this half an hour each day five days a week in some group instruction. at this rate we need to hire a couple more rsps for school sites for dyslexia, not a.d.h.d. or autism. we need more support to properly educate our children. if we don't deal with students' needs in the classroom, that turns into behaviors that go through the entire system and end up in discipline. it starts here. we need to address it. thank you. >> thank you. you mentioned timelines not being met. first of all, thank you for the presentation. it s

none of that suggests a valid legitimate policy objective. more so the president himself and his counsel is bringing at issue with the question of documents and witnesses. if over and over again as we have heard in the last few days, that the president was simply pursuing a valid legitimate policy objective, if this was a specific debate about policy, a debate about corruption. a debate about burden sharing, then let's have the documents that would show it. let's hear from the witnesses that would show that. because the documents and the witnesses that we have forded and talked about show the exact opposite. so the american people in this chamber deserve to have a fair trial. to the president deserves to have a fair trial. if he is arguing that there is evidence and a policy debate, then i think everybody would love to see those documents. they would love to see the witnesses and hear from them directly about what exactly was being debated. >> thank you, mr. manager. >> the senator from south carolina. >> i send the question to the desk for m

is that a valid argument from the democrats?ink it's a very valid argument, particularly with the pending election that's upon us. and combined with the administration and the president's boldness and basically saying the call was perfect, i did nothing wrong, and continuing to send his personal attorney over to ukraine to try to further this strategy of obtaining negative information on candidate biden and lord knows who else. i think it's a very valid concern on the part of the democrats. however, i also believe that they are undermining their own valid argument by now delaying transferring those articles of impeachment. >> and, listen, they may go over there this week, and it could be a wash in the end, and folks would've been watching football and on vacation. but we'll see. there could be a lot of surprises. a top house attorney has now floated the idea of a third article of impeachment, which will be interesting. you know, this related to the mueller investigation. i listened to adam schiff this morning and i want to get y

tens of thousands of people have valid in major australian cities to protest the bushfires crisis and demand action on climate change. the protest came as the country braced for more high temperatures and strong winds that are likely to set off even more places. these 26 -- at least 26 people have died and within 2000 homes were destroyed in the blazes. >> burnt down pickup truckss and fires still smolder on the side of the road. kyle mosier shows us the chicken coop in his yard. he was in such a hurry to escape that he forgot to open the door, his birds hahad no chance. >> you could just hear the rumbling. the roar of it. it is a sound i would never forget. it was horrible. >> kyle and his partner, david assessed the bouchard heap of rubble that was once their home. they say they feel numb. david was also outraged. >> w we did not have the firefighting aircraft that we should have had. we should be picking up our fire services if they need it. >> even the building right next door to the local fire department burned down. after months, the government has set side -- aside extra funds

or not valid? guest: i think there has been legit criticism of the way some in the evangelical community have supported president trump. the whole jesus saves, nebuchadnezzar, this, that, that is ridiculous. i push back on that on my show with maximum prejudice. and clearober minded thinking evangelicals are loyal to the president. it is clear. the democratic party, if you watch their debates, what hillary clinton said in 2016, they use the fcoercive power of government to hammer them for their beliefs and drive them out of the mainstream of the public square and shut down any businesses they own in the process. ask for jack who is the only baker in denver, colorado. it is an act of self-defense. no one has any moral high ground. if you are supporting the party, with its virginia governor, we give birth to kids, then we put it in swaddling clothes in the been and let the mom decide if she wants it and if she doesn't, we stick a fork in it and say adios. if that is your political party, i think mayb

tried to establish in court that their subpoenas were valid. we have an assertion of a legal deficiency on one side. they think it's different. they don't want to go to court and get it resolved. we have the assertion of absolute immunity from congressional compulsion for senior advisers to the president asserted by virtually every president since nixon. they try to say oh it's preposterous and it's irrelevant and we don't have to worry about that. every president since nixon virtually has asserted that but it's only been addressed by two district courts. trial level court's. the first one rejected it and its decision was made by the appellate court which means the appellate court thought probably you've gotten it wrong or at a minimum is a really different -- difficult question we aren't sure about that in the second district court decision is being litigated right now. they are litigating it. and when they say when charlie kupperman went to court they were trying to do something reasonable and say oh well we don't want to litigate this with y

. >> i was told my birth certificate is not valid. >> he had to get a new one. >> it was emotional. >> reporter: and feeling like he was denied at the dmv felt denied as an american citizen. >> and being turned away is the inference that i got is that i was not american and not born in the united states stunk. >> reporter: and then the chief discovered the real reason for the denial, is because it turns out that the department of homeland security dealed all birth certificates from puerto rico as a result of a scandal. he was not aware of it. >> it is valid reasons, but it has to be communicated better. >> reporter: garcia says nowhere in the application process does it explain the requirement, and so he is hoping for more clarification so no other puerto rican will feel the same h humiliation that he felt. >> the chief is going use this to make sure that whenever there is a new policy that he meets and greets with the communities to be a policy so that no one is left in the dark. >> it is possible that a decision is going to come today for two homeless mothers occupying a home in oak

that isn't a valid reason to not pursue litigation in the courts. and i think that's relevant to bear in mind what sort of a delay are we talkingd about lex in the mcgann case which they ty refer to a number of times they pointed out they presented it p. very long and drawn out they issued a subpoena but they didn't file the lawsuit until august. by november, november 25, they had a decision from the district court and it was argued on appeal in the circuit on january 3. the litigation iss pretty fast. and it can go faster. in the nixon case during watergate, the special prosecutor issued a subpoena on april 18, 1974. may 20, less than a month, the district court denied the motion to quash the subpoena. may 31, the supreme court agreed to hear the case before the judgment of the court of appeals, and on july 24, the supreme court issued its decision. that is lightning fast. so, when there is urgency to the case, when there is a reason for it, there can be expedition in the court and the decision can be had in a timely manner. in the one case that ac

>> guest: i don't think it is a valid assessment. i don't think the war with china is inevitable.his notion in the past going back to ancient time declining in the rising power will automatically go to war. first of all, this has been a major chinese propaganda that china is the rising power in the world and it's working to rise its power, but the united states must diminish. what we don't hear much about the south china is trying to diminish the united states, but i would say that it's definitely going to be the superpower and i agree with the strategy of peace through strength where they basically said if you want to prevent the war, make sure that the other side doesn't miscalculate into stumbling into the war. .. >>. >> we will get started virgo i am a member of the event staff i like to welcome you to this morning but if you haven't already done so

i don't want to hear it for myself i don't want to validate the credibility after all this is only ae, only a case or a trial of the impeachment of the president of the united states. if there's a bank robbery trial over somebody stealing a piece of mail but the impeachment of the president? know we don't need to see their credibility. is that where we are tonight? is that what the american people expect of a fair trial? i don't think it is. i yield back. >> senators this amendment would provide the presiding officer would it authorize a subpoena of any witness or any document with the presiding officer show rule of any witnesses or any document the senator moves the presiding officer determines that witness is likely to have probative evidence relevant to either article of impeachment. it's quite simple.

just remember, your valid uk driving licence and your valid car insurance documents.ot forget the most important members of the family. if you do have a valid pet passport, that will still be good to use after 31 january. but do keep an eye on this, because the rules could change from next year. your local vet, though, should have all the latest guidance. fan of a booze cruise? well, crack open another and celebrate, because nothing changes here. any alcohol you buy legally can be brought back home, if you transport it yourself, drink it, keep it, or give it away forfree. so there you have it. not a lot will change from this week to next. but remember, we'rejust change from this week to next. but remember, we're just at the beginning of all this. the clock has only just been reset, beginning of all this. the clock has onlyjust been reset, and a lot can happen a year. so many questions. you can tell from victoria that the message very clearly is 11pm, immediately, nothing is going to change. but a lot of people asking a lot of questions nonetheless. brea kfast‘s tim mu

tried to establish in court that their subpoenas were valid. an assertion of a legal deficiency on one side. they think it's different. they don't want to go to court and get it resolved. we have the assertion of absolute immunity from congressional compulsion for senior advisers to the president asserted by virtually every president since nixon. they try to say oh it's preposterous and it's irrelevant and we don't have to worry about that. every president since nixon virtually has asserted that but it's only been addressed by two district courts. trial level court's. the first one rejected it and its decision was made by the appellate court which means the appellate court thought probably you've gotten it wrong or at a minimum is a really different -- difficult question we aren't sure about that in the second district court decision is being litigated right now. they are litigating it. and when they say when charlie kupperman went to court they were trying to do something reasonable and say oh well we don't want to litigate this with you. you

that the court cannot say whether or not the subpoena is valid. if the president is telling him not to obey that subpoena, that's good enough. it's a fight between the executive and the legislative branches and the court should stay out. they're arguing in the impeachment trial that you have to let these subpoenas go through the courts and we have to have the courts deciding these things and we should be waiting for the courts to weigh in on all of these things. so, those two things are totally contradictory. is it their right to make contradictory arguments in these two different trial environments, or does one of those arguments undercut the other and hurt them, for example, in their don mcgahn case? >> go ahead. >> no, no be . >> no, no, you, chuck. >> there is a tradition in the law, and i think chris hayes mentioned it earlier of arguing in the alternative. very simple illustration. you and i are neighbors and your goat eats my roses. >> she's like that. >> i know. i've lived next to you for a long time. but you would argue in the alternative

this is going to be valid up to and including the date of expiry, at least until the end of 2020, noll continue to be a valid british travel document, even though it will not have the eu power. by the way, if you are hanging on fora power. by the way, if you are hanging on for a blue passport like the old ones, although it is actually black, that will not be happening just yet. they will start issuing them soon. in terms of driving a big concern for many motorists heading from here to calais and dunkirk, your driving licence stays completely valid all the way through europe. it may be from 2021 onwards, you will require a couple of international driving permit is to get from here to france to spain. european health insurance cards, that stays absolutely valid again until the end of the year for treatment in public hospitals in europe free of charge, usually. and roaming, you will be able to roam like at home. look, a picture of my cat, freya, and she will be able to travel to europe on exactly the same terms as normal until the end of the year, as can dogs and ferrets, but after that

valid claim of possession to the subject property and ha5 days to vacate we're ve pleased with the judge'suling a spokesperson for wedgwood properties which owns the home believes the judge made the right call it follows what the law is it follows whatethics and morals or. >>to protect peop's homes and protect people's properties. the squatters wroly took over this home they broke into it. we encourage them to leave peacefully can voluntarily this is what we're up against. >>a corporation who will put mothers and their children t and said the street thinkin that it is the moral and right thing to do but the moms for housing say this is just the beginning of a movement to bring awareness to a housing crisis which favors rich over poor this could be anyone. >>this could be you this could be your loved one that needs housing which is why we are screaming to the top of our ngs. the housing is a right. >that everyone should have access to. >>now for moms dot leave a judge's order dicates that in 5 days this order can be enforced and they can be removed from the house that we don't know exactly

unless it's been validated that is the basis of intelligence reporting. still to come on the program an arctic guest apparently falls victim to the u.s. social media purge of iranian voices that story and more after this short break. i'm max keiser with more of my guide to financial survival this is it's a my issues by professional scallywags to earn money. that's right these has flaws are simply not accountable and we're just getting more and more to the. totally destabilize the global economy you need to protect yourself and get informed because we. chose seemed wrong when the old rules just don't hold. any if you get to shape out these days become active. and engaged equals betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground. is you'll be a reflection of reality. in a world transformed. what will make you feel safe. isolation community. are you going the right way or are you being led. by. what is true what is faith. in the world corrupted you need to descend. to join us in the death. or inmate in the shallows. welco

why the clinton impeachment was legally and historically valid. this is not. sizing up his own arguments, he said at one point quote will law professors agree with this? no. they found one. dershowitz argued this impeachment is unconstitutional. in between judge star and dershowitz we had fill bin who talked about how terrible house democrats are and how ne fair-- described giuliani a big player who has nothing to do with this and shouldn't think too much about rudy giuliani. rudy giuliani, rudy giuliani. talked to rudy. don't think about him. he's a distraction. another thing about rudy. former florida attorney general and recipient of illegal campaign from president trump. history of joe biden anticorruption history in ukraine when he was vice president. the day's award of peak i'm rubber you're glue what aboutism. who represented trump for years in divorces and bankruptcies. he worked himself up to the argument that not only joe biden is the real corrupt one, not trump. instead of impeachment it's actually former president obama who should be being impeache

stack at the edge of your data center, is no longer a valid security solution.e you still need to do that, the world is shifting to what i would call a cloud direct solution. companies like okta, zscaler, crowdstrike, companies like mine cast and proof point are in the cloud and delivering cloud security. the companies that are in the perimeter side of it, like palo alto, checkpoint, these companies are trying to do a perimeter defense model where you are essentially trying to keep the bad guy out. you are just never going to win at that. there was a recent security survey where 76% of chief of security officers at enterprise expected that they would be hacked in the next 12 months. 60% of those said that they did not think they would know it when it happened. that is a function of the failure of perimeter defense to work. all a bad guy has to do is get there once. you have to keep them out 100% of the time. it is pretty obvious that is not working. we are moving to a world of zero trust or cloud direct security. these companies that are in the cloud that are de

validation for technology, validation for its products, and just its standing.hink capital is what they need most right now. it is not just in the u.s. they can look for capital in other places, but it needs the u.s. validation, even in accounting standards for their search for capital. make of thedo you chinese people's response to these negotiations with the united states? not been muchas nationalism yet. i have always been concerned by the way president trump has approached his whole trade war where he is constantly saying that china is the enemy but president xi is a close friend. it used to be before that u.s. leaders would say we have nothing against the chinese people, it is just their government -- or any other country they would have issues with. president trump has gone the other way saying china is the problem, but xi is a good friend. even though it gives president xi a lot of faith, it makes the people in china skeptical of u.s. intentions, gives rise to nationalism. david: many thanks to jorge guajardo, former ambassador of mexico to the people's r

it's a very valid point. quick thought on the president going to the march of life when no other president has come a quick thought on that? >> i was there. historic. thousands of young people showed in washington, d.c. i really applaud his courage. first president in history to address the gathering. >> politically we know that college educated suburban women, most of them were republicans, voted for donald trump in 2016 and abandon the republican party in droves in 2018. is it something they feel strongly about inconsistent with the president's view or not? you tell me and a question whether this is good or not. >> martha: we'll see. great to have both of you here. so senator josh hawley says absolutely clear in his opinion that hunter biden should be one of them. going to explain next why. it's not just a cold if you have high blood pressure. most cold medicines may raise blood pressure. coricidin hbp is the... ...#1 brand that gives... powerful cold relief without raising your blood pressure. (burke) we'v

what do we do to validate those numbers? can we send in the lawyers or the accountants under government compulsion to validate the numbers? if we are going to expect transparency, we have to know if we are accurate numbers and if there is something effort about the transparency that might be obligated under the content we areion piece, then talking about editorial processes it very well may be different than other disclosures the government requires were andch issues are in play the intervention in the government to validate the numbers might not be as intrusive into the editorial function. i would invite your feedback and thoughts about this. make thefor us to transparency option work, we have to know if we can believe in the numbers. i'm not sure how we are going to do that. idea on how to validate ,ransparency reporting numbers it was around the time of the snowden gleeks that tech theanies began providing response to government demands on user data. they werepeople handing over gobs of data to the u.s. government or many

the screen shot of an electronic ticket will not get you in either even if that ticket is valid. you must scan the actual bar code, not a picture of one. >> you won't know that until you come to the gate. you spent $200, $500, a thousand, whatever amount of dollars and you come to the game and we tell you i'm sorry, that ticket's invalid. now you have four victims sitting outside your gate very upset that they can't watch the game. >> there were no reports of fake tickets at last week's game but some fans were disappointed to find out screen shots of tickets didn't work. a seller must transfer a valid ticket onto a buyer's mobile device and then the bar code will get you in. >> beware of sellers who only accept cash from payment apps that don't offer buyer protection. the team says the safest way to buy a ticket is through the 49er website or ticketmaster. you'll need a mobile device to buy one and it won't be cheap. prices now range about $350 for standing room all the way up to $10,000 and more for vip seating. i want to hear from you. the 7 on your side hotline is open monday

eddie: the reason they don't accept it are for absolutely valid reasons.derstand that, it was just--it needs to be communicated better. damian: garcia says nowhere in the application process does it explain the requirement. he's hoping for more clarity by the dmv so no other puerto rican will feel the same humiliation he felt today. damian: and we've since learned that the chief has now received his new birth certificate in the mail, so now he's going back to the dmv. speaking of the chief, every cadet in the san jose police department right now who wants to be a cop is taking a crash course in spanish. the chief says that this is to make sure that they better serve the spanish speaking community. male: did you tell him not to stay in the vehicle? did you say anything else to him? male: i told him, "un momento." damian: the recruits are roleplaying. male: how did you tell him to turn off the motor? male: apaga motor. male: apaga motor, perfect. damian: veteran san jose police officers are spending three classes teaching future cops very basic spanish. carl

unless it's been validated that is the basis of intelligence reporting. the u.s. has confirmed it's investigating a pentagon plane crash in the eastern afghan provinces of gaza in the on monday everyone on board the surveillance aircraft which was carrying military personnel and high ranking cia officers was killed the plane burst into flames and came down in a mountainous area the pentagon says it can't confirm whether it was brought down by enemy fire seemingly contradicting the taliban statement. of a u.s. bombardier levon a crash today in gaza me province afghanistan while the cause of crash is under investigation there are no indications the crash was caused by enemy fire a special way a graft of the american occupier was flying in their rear for the purpose of an untold and smithson in the saddle cow routes and of de yak district of gas in the province or mujahideen have taken down the aircraft tactically the incident comes as washington bids for a peace deal with the taliban after numerous failed talks the us has been at war in afghanistan for 19 years marr

basis will charge them sanctions like they've never seen before ever on their rainy and late as a valid point to avenge saddam on his death our senior correspondent there i guess he has been looking at how it might be better moved to play the long game. on the face of it trump and iran they always wanted the same thing iran knew secret always wanted the us to get the hell away from it out of iraq out of the middle east and trump well he won the election promising to end america's wars we want to bring our troops back home and i got elected on that if you go back and look at our speeches i would say we want to bring our troops back home from these endless wars what a man wouldn't say to get elected in reality he escalated conflict if the conflict where there was a scratch trumps policies would tear it open into a wound on the trump of america went from a fool with iran having a nuclear deal to assassinating iran's 2nd most powerful official i don't think trump expected this not merely in mourning a man that the u.s. claimed was a terrorist and i highly doubt he expected to have all his e

but i think there's an obligation on journalists when briefed by anonymous sources to check the validity of what the story is they're being told as best they can but unfortunately in today's world. belief seems to trump knowledge and. i think when it comes to facts facts have ceased to matter to far too many people who make judgments and pass judgments and express opinion indeed we now live in a world where opinion i think is given greater importance than knowledge or very briefly before we get on to current events do you think live or add to wouldn't be the shock if you haven't destroyed your career i have no doubt that the manner in which he engaged with the issues that i write about substantially contributed beneficially to his reputation because of the perception that was created in the mind of viral. people at the time because of the manner in which he was promoted by the media for the media it's of course manna from heaven when one member of cabinet has perceived either publicly or behind the scenes to be having a go at another member of cabinet and i have no doubt that that contri

torture than violations of right child you really thing the people of hong kong a sec need some a valid my life not only looking forward to that i thing in today's world shit we should be very objective and non-biased about china let's look at how child as developing let's look at china lifting hundreds of millions of people al a poverty lets you look at how or hong kong has benefited a tremendously over the past 22 years after being part of the one country it is system after chana re exercised is sovereignty of a hunk cults to i'd as this is no make a t. let's talk about says it was the go in in the in an interview earlier in the year you cord it unfortunate censorship in china you said hopefully eventually there will be less censorship leading towards no censorship at all and i hope they'll be a day when people in china can freely watch foreign broadcasters that's pretty full on hope isn't it when you consider that 400000000 extra c.c.t.v. cameras ago alive and the unprecedented degree of intrusion by the state into people's lives that we're seeing things are not moving in the directi

i can validate everything i say. >> o'donnell: and nancy joins us from the hill.o democrats tried to make the case that in order to determine motive you need to hear from witnesses. what's the likelihood of that. >> reporter: well, it looks less likely tonight, norah, because a couple of key republicans have announced today they are probably going to vote no on witness, but it is still going to be razor tight. there is a strong chance this could be a 50/50 vote, which would force the supreme court justice, john roberts, to make the tie-breaking vote. >> o'donnell: that would be incredible. all right, nancy. thank you. president trump had john bolton on his mind today at the white house. he took to twitter to attack the man that he once chose to be his national security adviser, and the administration is moving to block bolton's book from being published. weijia jiang reports tonight from the white house. >> we're finally ending the nafta nightmare. >> reporter: even as president trump signed a new north american trade deal today, he injected impeachment into his r

when he was in the country 7 years ago and west again says many of the report sources haven't been validated. this so-called primary sub source a russian emigre real estate broker in the united states and he in effect distance and self from the sourcing of the information and the really salacious material we were relating to president trump he claims he received in a 10 to 15 minute telephone call from somebody who he didn't know an anonymous source and run him and gratuitously volunteered this information so none of this kind of material should appear unless it's been validated that is the basis of intelligence reporting. the u.s. confirms it's investigating the crash of one of his military planes in afghanistan get on that story after this break. seemed wrong but. just don't call. me. yet to stamp out. the consequence of. engagement equals betrayal. when something you find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground . showing becomes a passive mechanism right so they buy back their own stock with cheap money from the fed. it goes through the company ostensibly to help the c

president dollar trump is valid to impose severe sanctions on iraq if it expels u.s. troops deployed there iraq's parliament to score for foreign troops to leave but trump said baghdad would have to pay for the cost. an airbase if that happened meanwhile iran's leaders have presided over the funeral of general custom stolen money and others killed in the u.s. drone strike on friday. weeping over the remains of iran's top military commander. bremer leader ayatollah ali how money visibly moved as he leads funeral prayers for his former close ally. hundreds of thousands of mourners gathered to pay their respects to general cass and salim money killed in a u.s. drone strike in iraq on friday. his assassination is considered a declaration of war by many iranians. speaking at her father's funeral the general's own daughter has promised reprisals there are higher than army quite that i've asked families of american soldiers in western asia have witnessed america's humiliation and syria iraq lebanon afghanistan yemen and palestine they will spend their days waiting for the de

the characteristics of something like a missile hitting that airplane you would also go and get validation for that every verification from that from refugee examination you would get a lot of information from the refugee stimulation i can tell you that at this point i would say that the people who are on site there if they have the expertise they should they know already whether that aircraft was brought down by a missile or not the people you know ran the authorities sure would already know and we know that you know where you are canada particularly hard hit by this a 3rd of the crash victims were canadians canada is demanding that its own experts be a wild to join the crash investigation i mean do you expect that is going to happen again do you fear that we'd have a crash situation now that that has really fallen right into a a geo political firestorm. it certainly could there could be there already and into the fires or because who knows what the center in atlanta do it's really up to them how they react to requests for participation in the investigation a normal investigation would ha

from when he was in the country 7 years ago west again says none of the reports sources have been validated so-called primary sub source a russian emigre real estate broker in the united states and he in effect distance and self from the sourcing of the information and the really salacious material they were relating to president trump he claims he received in a 10 to 15 minute telephone call from somebody who he didn't know an anonymous source and run him and gratuitously volunteered this information so none of this kind of material should appear unless it's been validated i say is the basis of intelligence reporting. still to come in the program china confirms new coronavirus victims as countries step up cautionary measures to tell top to the sharp right. i would hope to. put themselves on the line. to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president and you. want. to going to be pros which is what before 3 of them or 10 people. into studios and the wives. going becomes a passer mechanism right so they buy back their own stock with cheap money from the fed and it goes through th