also being able to use the rule that is in their hand to be able to validate so -- able to validate themselves. >> ms. washington, do you have anything to add? ms. washington: i would say, right now, without a standard procedure, people who feel less powerless in society will how toy not figure out dispute it. rep. foster: there is probably also a tendency for wealthy people to have more established financial transaction records to be used in a secondary way to make sure the person is real and so on. add?u have anything to take into we have to consideration, for all the things we are putting in place to protect consumers, there are much easier ways to go back and negotiate the system. all of the controls we are putting on for artificial intelligence, you have to understand who this person is. we need to go further up the chain and make sure that identity is actually factual first. we need to get to the root of the issue instead of just addressing in some cases the symptoms. we would get much more collaborative between industry and government. we need to reshape the issue and look at it from a

that we ultimately should take the responsibility from obtaining a valid list of citizens and i think that there has been a lot of emotion, birth by government, and emotion in terms of public perception of what is needed here. so, this is one of the reasons i am really eager to hear from the witnesses in this hearing and i guess i -- in light of the fact that we are unlikely to have a large amount of time because votes may be intervening, i think i will cut off my comments here, and turn it over to my colleague representative hill. >> thank you mister chairman, for convening the hearing today as part of our task force on artificial intelligence. i know this is a topic that you particularly care deeply about, and i am very interested in learning how our systems can be modernized in such a way that protects the privacy of personal information of all of our citizens, i look forward to hearing from the panel today, which we anticipate in a digital world, where we are distributing financial services product to italy through banks and loan banks across the country, obviously, whether it is

he needs to validate that this was a credible threat.o let's assume for a minute that the whistleblower is fearlessly -- and someone who do not have firsthand knowledge of this. there has to be an investigation. the people he or she talks to, those people have to validate what they said and all the information has to be put on the record. it does not matter that this person was not on the call or talking to other people. the investigations will bring the facts to the forefront. >> in terms of that investigation, the ig found the whistleblower "arguable and favorably biassed but still deemed to credible." . so there are some bias for rival politicians some where but this is all credible. >> right, and so that's a very good question. two ways. one way is you got to look at the facts of the case beyond what the whistleblower says. we have a transcript and other people, we have 14 day to talk to other people and validate what this whistleblower is saying. if other people say yes, that's my recollection of the call and i had the same concerns

to be able to validate for financial transactions. into the process would give them access to financial transactions in a safe and sound manner. >> to have anything to add? >> i want to say, right now without a standard way and procedure for disputing authentication issues, people who feel less powers under powerless are not going to figure out how to disputed, by default we will not have equal access to resolving disputes. >> this probably also a tendency for wealthy people to have a more established financial transaction record that can be used in a secondary way to make sure the person is real and so on. you have any thing to add? >> we also have to take into consideration that for all the things were putting in place to protect consumers, there are much easier ways to tech estat p back and go through the system, all the controls putting on for artificial intelligence in authentication startup different, you need to know who the person is and then go through and do the authentication. we need to go further up the chain and make sur

requests, so we will use whatever leverage we can, but at the end of the day, we are determined to validate this to make sure people can expose wrongdoing. here goes welle beyond this complaint and this president too if any oversight is possible, any whistleblower is protected, and we are determined to validate that authority of congress. [inaudible] >> c-span's washington journal. live every day. coming up friday, we will discuss the house oversight and reform committees investigations of president trump. also, with gerald connolly. journal, liveon at 7:00 p.m. eastern. join the discussion. live friday in the c-span network, the house returns at 9:00 a.m. eastern to take up legislation on forced arbitration. the state dinner for the australian prime minister scott morrison. a climatevists held rally. ladydent trump and first the first lady-- will host the second state dinner of his administration. watch guest arrivals and dinner toasts. live coverage begins friday at 6:30 p.m. eastern. free radio app. glia -- eugene scalia testified in his nomination to serve as labor secretary. of topics

to disagree with him in terms of of trying to outright ban crypto currencies but i think there's a valid point to be made there about the way thanks because conducted itself as a tech company if they were to apply the same kind of principles and business practices to their currency libra i think there would be major questions for a lot of individuals and even governments to say can we really trust what you're doing and while france is visibly most visibly opposing libor others are notably cool to it as well the governor of the bank of england mark carney said he would engage libor with quote an open mind but not an open door is it time to question whether this project really will ever launch. well i think it's hard to say look i think at this point it will ultimately launch and i think the reason for that is because of the backing of the corporations the fortune 500 companies that are really powering libor and so what mark zuckerberg is very smartly done and what libor has very smartly done is they've not made it soley a facebook project but they have brought in these other fortune $500.

is that still valid? shortly. which you haven't seen but you say you don't think it is still valid. we should look at the actual facts when we look at the updated document.” the actual facts when we look at the updated document. i would love you to talk factually and accurately. but you said you don't think a shortage of certain types of fresh food is still valid. i don't think that will be the case. you don't think that will be the case. you have change what you said initially. i don't think i have. what it says in the document is that these things could happen. it also says there will be no shortage of food, that is what it says. it also says a shortage of certain types of fresh food. we need to look at the worst—case scenario and put measures in place to make sure we deal with it and that is the sensible thing to do. it also says people on low incomes will be disproportionately affected by any prices in fuel and food rising. is that still valid?” don't know if that has been dealt with by the mitigation

identifying whether a power has been used for a valid purpose is a legal question. a political question. it is a question for the courts and the rule of law so demands. this court is not being asked to identify a list of purposes for which prorogation would be lawful, nor is this court being asked to specify what would be a valid period of prorogation. the court is being asked to answer the legal question of whether it is within the scope of the power conferred on the prime ministerfor him to exercise it for the purpose alleged. it was argued the motivation for preventing prime minister because he saw it as a threat and he wanted to silence it. joanna cherry is the scottish national party mp who has led the legal bid to try and stop parliament from being closed, from being suspended for five weeks. i spoke to harry minutes ago.|j being suspended for five weeks. i spoke to harry minutes ago. i will use the words of lord drummond young. he said it is not thejob of the judiciary young. he said it is not thejob of thejudiciary to young. he said it is not thejob of the j

human beings and that's the most painful experience is not to be seen and not to be validated and not to be supported and so it wasn't just a disaster in its own terms which was bad enough it was a disaster in terms of the. enormity of warning signs and the absolutely heartless response of the government after it happened. it's interesting you immediately mention says you can only get indicate is this program was attacked in the london times for introducing cold sets of clubs with respect to what was actually had an accident as can sit for us by the authorities had that accident happened in buckingham palace or somewhere else here years of london let's see what the response would have been nothing is free of class bias in a class ridden society and disasters fall disproportionately the impact of austerity for example does not hit the upper class the way it hits people in the lower rungs of this social ladder so it warren buffett said there's a class war and we've won. you know he was one of these very conscious. wealthy people who knows what that she going on is that you know of cours

which is a petro chemicals company and a few other industries these are all valid because of the apartheid regime and build these incredibly looting industries that affect the communities that live next to them and they also have a huge impact on using carbon emissions it's good to put a human face to the climate change story and i think this is an opportunity to do that and at the same time track the conference in new york track it as effectively as possible look at what the government here is doing and what it plans to announce as impressive as the consortium's joint output has been the question begged is what took them so long the new york times had this page one story on a scientist working for nasa predicting much of what we are seeing today record heat waves droughts and sea level rises if global warming went on checked that piece was written 31 years ago in 1908. what followed has been not just a failing of governments but of news media as well part of which is a continuing failure to connect the dots on us broadcast networks a.b.c. c.b.s. and n.b.c. all recently gorged on the cover

in the democratic primary fields of the last several cycles, new hampshire has been a validator like when john kerry won iowa and he was able to win new hampshire, or it becomes the extender where we disagree with what happened in iowa, barack obama, you end up losing new hampshire -- >> new life to hillary clinton. >> either the winner of iowa will get validated by what goes on or we'll see an extended debate that will play out for a long time. >> is there an argument that since you have two senators, massachusetts and vermont in the game, that the conventional wisdom will be that doesn't matter, they had a homefield advantage? >> i think there's a chance that the door three this time around could be devaluing new hampshire. by that i mean, maybe some of the other leading candidates like a kamala harris or pete buttigieg or someone decides i'm going to step out. essentially going to do not contest new hampshire. i'm going to not allow either warren or sanders or whoever to get credit. maybe i double down in south carolina or california. i'd watch out for something like that. you pro

he's one of the first to validate it could work in the sea and deliver marines ashore. he and the sergeants below him were those who tool ed around i this and understood it could be useful. and their reports would have an influence to determine to mass produce it. but one of the unanswered challenges was could this vehicle really work in heavy pacific surf. like the kinds you might see in the surfing competitions in the coast of hawaii. where massive waves could be generated, slamming into coral reeves. the challenge for the marines is they are looking at the central pacific. and envisioning what the complexities might entail. they wanted to ensure this particular vehicle could withstand the battering damage of heavy wastes and real coral reefs. so he was pulled out of a particular job in the western pacific and reassigned to test the vehicle. and basically his orders were destroy your vehicle. drive it to the point it breaks apart. soo what the limits of they are. how survivable it really is. and he writes about this in his pie yog if i and a few other places. but i ha

of justice who says you need to validate it but the republican congress, the tax bill that donald trumpcluded the provision that gives these attorneys the ammo to undermine it, this notion that the tax law no longer covers the validity of obamacare. and so i think democrat candidates need to do is yes hit policy, health care is number one. and we know for the first time in ten years costs are continuing to go up, but you've got to drill down to trumpism and at its base he's a fraud, a huckster, somebody with whom you can't put your trust. so if you're a trump voter he had broken his promises to you including on health care. >> well, that's a problem for members of the house. john, you covered this. what are members of the republican house trying to fight them for their seats back or hold onto what seats are left but they have to go ought to their voters, real voters and the real voters say we don't have protection for pre-existing conditions and we don't have protection for our young adult children because you don't have a replacement. >> it's now about mid-september. there are i believ

>> validate the laws. reverse the decision. >> the burden has been shifted and the claims process. explain that to me again.>> for example with generali claims, generali argued that the database in 1936 was complete and that any claims or policy wasn't on that database had been paid or lapsed and icheck accepted that as a basis for family claims so if you he is here from maryland and his family's name wasn't on the list but there was a policy and under state law if there is proof of policy the burden is on the insured to improve and they didn't have to do that. spoke to give me an example of a case where they said the family had been paid. >> that he was from miami a survivor and was on the-he knew they had a policy and they acknowledged there had been a polished a policy and there was a token payment from germany, but it had nothing to do with the fact-then he applied to icheck and they said your dad was paid, but they didn't provide him with any documents. what could he do? he had no documents and he had no basis to appeal because he had to take that at face value. we later got d

if we don't know what is happening and we have not validated it scientifically, we need to do somethingevent the illnesses and deaths and the use of the product that is totally illegal if needs to be validated and certified, and it's not the most highly sensety product we have to date. >> okay, gentleman, thank you so much for sharing your time. >> have a good day. >> i do want to add that juul put out a statement that they agree with the need for category wide action on flavored producten athey will fully comply with the fda policy when effective. coming up, is president trump linking a surprising concession he made and american jobs lost because of his trade policies. s. ♪ ensure he's well taken care of, even as you build your own plans for retirement. see how lincoln can help. but dad, you've got allstate. with accident forgiveness they guarantee your rates won't go up just because of an accident. smart kid. indeed. are you in good hands? but we're also a company that controls hiv, fights cancer, repairs shattered bones, relieves depression, restores heart rhythms, helps you back fro

is indirectly related to identity validation. if we are worried about the questions of abuse and misuse of information, identity validation is another approach. now in america that might not have as much negative consequences if you are a political organizer in egypt, then the validation is a huge issue. i actually see 230 and identity, as tied. there may be, if we could figure out what the right balance might be, you might need more of one and less of another, but that is really where i think part of this debate ought to head and i would welcome thoughtful approaches on how we can sort that through. i do think on the technical basis, data portability and interoperability would be a great issue as well, because that would go back to the original premise we have, if you didn't like the kind of information you are receiving on platform a, you could move to platform be. you can do that today. one of the things i would also add. without getting too crazy, with details on this, but if we do data portability and interoperability, anoth

they are ticked off they will validate the anger and give you a youtube video why you exist so thosereal differences that can give you chapter in first and homegrown's were the ideology is razor thin. you cannot tell khalid shaikh mohammed what he did was wrong. you can't he will explain otherwise. dealing with law enforcement action dealing with the homegrown to be indoctrinated the likelihood you can turn them much higher simply because they don't have that depth of ideological understanding and someone who is an expert could say what are you thinking? after a while they can explain so a committed years long terrorist went the wrong way at 17 of how ud and doctrine he is significantly different khalid shaikh mohammed will be proud of 9/11 forever. thank you again now i will sign your books. thank you for the questions. [applause] >> this is the question of how much do you really trust do you think god is limited to the two-party system? he cannot fulfill his will on earth on the shoe vote for the republican i think the argument is tempting but dangerous and contributes to keeping a

acting director of national intelligence confirmed the validity of the complaint on capitol hill today. >> that is correct. that is in the proper letter that has been provided to the committee. i believe that is also made public. the decision and recommendation by the inspector general that infect the other kitchen was credible. mark: house intelligence committee chairman adam schiff has called the allegations deeply disturbing. the centers for disease control is reporting that 12 people have died from an illness brought on by vaping. 805 cases in total have been reported. this report is drawing criticism from lawmakers, anti-smoking advocates, and parents concerned about a surge in underage vaping. it comes alongside major changes to juul. one of the exec gives left the company yesterday. the gap between the haves and have-nots in the united states grew last year to its highest level in more than 50 years when tracking income inequality. that is according to figures released by the census euro today. the areas with the most income inequality last year were coastal places with lots abo

are valid robert and s.s. you are but my little. know how i thought they were marvelous one marvelous wine and quite on the edge tomorrow leave a man or. only one more day in. all that one neck if you're on the 2nd i'm homeless too i just know it's not. a nurse or. how that a kid could hold it out and never let out a letter or cathartic and. no doubt the bundle at the mill i'm not meant to share much i feel iraq i don't harbor here. can lose. yanni duffer and have. them be. clueless or. kill bin mubarak. hear a bit about it and it was stated. what the but if that and feel about. let's. use the fear given us to be what for and then the whole us but that. was the mark of the blackness and promote kind of the more. sob it. wasn't the idea can it be like a 2nd before we act you. can have a corner of the pulse of libya. talk to another pharmacist business leader and inspiration to many young people in her adopted home then other lands. in part to another successful woman this time based in italy so my abdul qadeer is an elected member of

this document absolutely validates the wisdom of speaker pelosi's decision to open up formal impeachment inquiry. president trump and his allies and leader mcconnell and leader mccarthy will say this is about politics and of course, they will do what they usually do and accuse them of trying to read litigate 2016. there is no credible or straightfaced reason to believe that. this is about our national security and the integrity of our foreign policy and democratic elections. this is about abuse of power by an overreaching executive, something the founding fathers feared and what they feared at the top of the list was that the overreaching executive would be involved with foreign powers to join us with what happened here in america. there should be bipartisan concern about these issues and there should not be democrats or republicans but it should be congressman of either party who are saying we need to look into this and indeed just yesterday every single public and senator said the administration's decision to withhold the whistleblower complaint from congress was wrong. just had a vote

normal lives the w space with 94 year olds and challenged i need to ask a valid fish on the day she receives a special prize from the country but tried to can't. exactly carol lam denies offering her resignation over protests in the territories despite a leaked recording of her telling business leaders that she would step down if she caught. at least 5 times her contorting devastates of the harvest causing damage the government says is unprecedented it's now having slowly towards the united states where more than a 1000000 people have been ordered to leave their homes. i'm for welcome to the program. in just a few hours britain's new prime minister barak's johnson will face his 1st parliamentary showdown over breath sets some lawmakers are moving to stop the possibility of a leaving the european union without a withdrawal agreement they believe this would be disastrous for the british economy but mr johnson says he needs the possibility of no deal to strengthen his hand in negotiations with the e.u. . there were rival demonstrations outside the british parliament again on tuesday some 4 brag

, economics and come up little strength and we are reaching back to these a treaties which e still valid in asserting our rights. >> host: when it comes to the participation of congress was a quick participation when he made this call or did it take time? give us the timeframe. >> guest: we made the announcement a few weeks ago and the council of the cherokee nation unanimously confirmed him and we reached out to members of congress so she has not been exceeded yet but we fully expect that to happen. the very basic message that it will take two leaders in the capital is that we just want the united states to keep its workt were asking to make good on the promise they made in 1835. >> host: what is the response from members of congress to this process you're trying to get done? there has been overwhelming support. a lot of questions but more questions about how to get this done and we use the u.s. territory mechanism as the template for seeding me or do we look at distinctions between us versus u.s. territories where our right is treaty based so we want to work collaboratively and we have

when i saw that much information in there, i felt validated.search, a lot of manpower had gone into this first entry into the house. and this was validation that, again, we were on to the right person. that we had a guy who was collecting information. and this is the information that we thought was at risk that may have already gone to china or may soon go to china. >> the search of the house confirmed he's stealing information, but we didn't have the proof that he was committing espionage. and that would include giving it to a foreign government. we can prove he stole it. we can prove that he traveled, but we couldn't prove that he traveled with the classified documents. that was the next step. that was the smoking gun we needed to go to the next level. >> after the covert entry, the next big break happened. when we recovered something from the trash. >> we were looking through chi mak's trash for almost a year before we found any real high value evidence. >> amongst the trash, we're found a lot of tiny little papers with chinese characters on

the complaint unquestionably validated speaker pelosi's decision to open an formal impeachment inquiry into these matters. mr. president, we're living in an incredibly delicate time for our democracy. we have a responsibility now to corroborate the facts in the whistle-blower's complaint, solicit testimony from those involved, and pursue the relevant avenues of inquiry that arise. we have a responsibility to consider the facts that emerge squarely and with the best interest of our country, not our party, in our hearts. we have a responsibility not to rush to final judgment or overstate the case, not to let ourselves be ruled by passion, but by reason. for if the house at the end of its inquiry sees fit to accuse the president of impeachable offenses, we in the senate will act as jury. and our role as the solemn jurors of democracy demands that we place fidelity to the constitution above else. now on the appropriations committee. the business of the american people and the responsibilities of congress do not pause while the house perhaps to formally begin an impeachment inquiry. today,

to without there being much substance so these policies so i think in that regard the criticism is valid however the same time you do have. many elements or many factions in august in the united states which would criticize trump would ever he may do. these these people include those in the report a republican and also in a democratic party with or sort of that the deep state is deeply opposed to the policies pursued by trump so on the one hand the criticism is valid on the other hand as well you do have people who are waiting to just jump on trump whenever he makes a mistake to try and put pressure and to show that he is actually unqualified for pursuing foreign policy and being president. u.s. secretary of state mike pompei on has said that many taliban fighters have been killed by the u.s. recently let's take a quick listen to exactly what he had to say. the commander resolute support and the nato forces there are still at this hard and we killed over a 1000 taliban just in the last 10 days and while this isn't a war of attrition the burka people should know we will continue to apply

were looking to identify and validate the validation that it's. this could increase through put and are also looking to develop and fund the prototypes because you can have a device that may look cool and it's a pretty good prototype so we wanted to look like this so we'll have it faster and we have to have this validation with our applicable to our devices. >> thank you. >> we also have to make sure that we don't have commerce in terms of those devices and that really has happened over and over again and we take a very hard look. it's great to get something to market quickly and to make reference to e-cigarettes and so forth and here we go and in terms of difficulty and deaths. rod talking about people who potentially can die. we have to be careful of cutting these corners. >> thank you very much. thank you doctor and i think your team has always good to see you and that you are continuing this with his life saving work. a couple of questions i'd like to ask. i have three and i'm trying to do get in. first of all, let me just mention this request

right now from politicians is to be elected on how democratic they are and whether their opinion is valid or not and this is exactly what leads to such broad support and- therefore the far right afp whether you agree with that or not it's the phantom phenomenon and is that. and i think that they do it they they want their experiences to be validated they want these broken biographies as you called them to be to be seen by by the mainstream of germany and mainstream media. to just be part of germany and be seen as. like part of it and not not as this. weird sort of cast off flyover country but. i just want to ask one thing about a point that is often. asserted in connection with political attitudes and support for the aft namely the idea that it reflects the communist era era socialization of older germans and even a kind of nostalgia for an easier time do you think that's true yeah definitely and i also think that germans weren't good democrats in the fifties. they weren't good democrats in the sixties they had the economic wondered it's bischoff's wanda and that's how that went on until

transportation secretary elaine chao here in washington they told the media that while child valid matts would not fly again until they were certain it was safe they say she stopped short of committing to let various investigations play out for as he was recently sworn into office federal aviation administrator stephen dixon was more committal vowing that this plane will not fly in commercial service until i am completely assured that it is safe to do so f.a.a. is following no timeline in returning the aircraft to service rather we are going where the facts lead us and diligently ensuring that all technology and training is present and correct before the plane returns to passenger service although max only represents 5 percent of its fleet southwest airlines flies more of them than any other carrier and after earlier. moving match from the schedule through november 5 they have now extended to january 5 but that is shallow consolation to those families who lost loved ones in those crashes can you imagine how they feel our next guest can jamie finch is former director for office of governm

but in the same way, the crowd gives it validation. that is its own methodological way of understanding. >> down in front here. >> i wonder, if part of the problem is not that this is part of a continuum that is very hard to differentiate.

if the project is not consistent with the rest of the neighborhood, that is a valid reason for denying a permit application. this is going on rampantly, in my neighborhood, and a lot of right -- neighborhoods in san francisco. people are buying things, remodeling them, upscaling them, and putting giant mansions on little lot. this is not quite that. but it is sort of in that mode. it sounds like the people that want to build this deck that is doing something inconsistent with the rest of the houses, in the area. being code compliant is a floor. it is not a ceiling. that is the meaning of discretionary in discretionary review. just because it is code compliant does not mean it is automatically something that fits in the neighborhood, or that is a reasonable considerate thing to be doing to their neighbors area i was in the exact same position. you can have decks that loom over you, and really invade an area that has been open space for decades. i just want to remind you, code compliant is not the only thing to consider. >> thank you. >> do you live in the neighborhood? >> no. >> any oth

for clarify, george, it has no validity.ent reached its conclusion on attributing to russia of the dnc hack in 2016 before it communicated to the fbi long before the fbi ever knocked on the door ats the dnc. >> charlie sykes, you come from the world of talk radio and you know as well as i do there are these means that can go around in the world of right wing talk that land in the seats of fox news anchor and getting repeated and repeated. the president of the united states -- i found what's interesting by the lawyers that you do see an attempt to pin this on rudy giuliani as the sole source of donald trump's misbelieves. is that going to work with republicans? are they going to cast rudy giuliani under the bus and walk away and say it is all good now? >> i think they would love to throw rudy giuliani under the bus. they're joined too closely. on the call, president trump is talking about rudy giuliani as my guy and my envoy and personal attorney. that sound byte is a wow moment. the degree of crazy, what is in the president

we will use whatever leverage we can but at the end of the day we are determined to validate the whistleblower process to make sure people can expose wrongdoing. what is at stake here goes well beyond this complaint and this president to whether any oversight is possible and if any whistleblower is affected. >> president trump and melania trump will host their second steak dinner of the administration. watch guest arrivals and dinner toasts. our live coverage begins friday on c-span online at cspan.org or listen on the free c-span radio app. the c-span radio app. >> paul murray is commentator and host of pulmonary life for sky news australia. thank you for being here.>> it's an absolute pleasure. >> told us about the prime minister, who is he? >> morrison is a conservative politician stop at times is far more well known to be an economic conservative being hawkish about for security. he is a christian but he's gone out of his way to make

vice president, one of your opponents was using people's to validate frustration with another mass shooting and lack of action. what do you think -- what you say to americans who don't think that this political process can do anything? >> it has to do something. these are critical things. the vote came to a head this weekend. the first, climate change, an existential threat, this guy can no longer deny the science. if it were a parliamentary system we would call for elections tomorrow. another 18 months for something to happen in terms of climate. need?his he gabriel to come down and say that this is a real problem? it's gigantic what's happening here. largest storm of the atlantic? anyway, dealing with firearms, with all due respect to the governor of texas, what they are doing is irrational. on the very day that you cms shooting, the number is up to what, five killed? and we are talking about loosening access to have guns, taking them into places of worship, storing them in schools? it's absolutely irrational. totally irrational. it's all about special interests and it has to stop. it has

to request him to look into it in the meantime and is the permit valid? the gentleman could construct it in the meantime, and then we're looking backwards. how does it proceed to look into the matter of who has the authority to construct within their property, and how does that unfold? >> they could fight a come -- file a complaint with d.b.i. and we will start the investigation. it could be that the complaint numbers issued improperly to the wrong party. we would contact the permit holder and say, hey, you have to hold off on this construction until we figure this out. and sometimes it does get very -- when it turns into a civil issue, these people might need to file a lawsuit on this. when it gets too complicated for us, we say go to the court to figure this out. you get an injunction to stop the work, as well. but when people present documents to d.b.i., and when you fill in a permit application and you reflected that you are allowed to get that permit and you say on the form, that is a legal document, and if proven otherwise somewhere else, that's a w

think of this as a culture, not a religious group, the organization validates their anger.they can give you 3 minutes on what the organization is all about in contrast to collegiate mohammed. if you ask him three questions about ideology they can't get you there. they are just ticked off, the groups is come into our organizational we will validate your anger and give you a youtube video that helps you understand why we exist, real differences between core organizations that can give you chapter and verse on ideology and homegrowns where the ideology is razor thin with the final thing i would say has to do with practitioner's issue. you can't tell collegiate, what he did was wrong. you can't. he will explain to you otherwise. when you're dealing with law enforcement action or a social services organization dealing with the homegrown who has been indoctrinated over the course of two month, the likelihood you could turn that person is much much much higher. simply because they don't have the depth of ideological indoctrination or understanding and someone who's an expert might

i think it's a very valid point the point to understand is that indonesian politics has dissolved into 2 coalitions it's now a bipolar system even though it's a very complex mysie multi-party system without any clear conviction politics the exceptions that conviction politics they need is 'd the islamist parties who are all in that coalition you know opposition around proposed to be an totally unsuccessful contender for the presidency the parties supporting the president on paper at least should have no truck with these toxic articles but these are being snarky and because these islamist parties which represent less than one 5th of the parliament couldn't get support in public through elections for such laws 'd they have bundle them up with this new criminal code hoping they'll get through and they can pressure the president so it really requires some strength from the president and from them from his coalition partners in parliament because these are not laws that asians have voted for that if they project are the parties that push these ideas they don't reflect the thinking of most m

sadly they will validate the issues that we re they will validate the issues that were being raised,ed, and really give usa were being raised, and really give us a call to action of what we need to do now to make the changes. how are you going to attract more women into the business? your building is extremely impressive and you have a real sense of the history. itjust stands out in london, it is known globally, but it is so male dominated. i think we have at all the best intentions, but in my experience, until we define where we wa nt to experience, until we define where we want to get to and we are prepared to measure and manage the change, particularly around gender equality, it won't happen, so we need to be a lot more robust. that was john neil, the relatively new boss of lloyd's of london talking about their results. we have fiona cincotta with us, market analyst at city index, nice to see you, fiona. do i assume that you are just watching the fed, having a long lunch, watching the fed? that is the big focus of the week. there was oil, but the fed is what everybody is watching.

your complaints to social media because at least in social media you'll receive some degree of validation and acceptance i think that was a dangerous aspect of the me too phenomenon as well we know that in england and wales you know we're relatively good at dealing with these allegations now that's certainly not true across the world frankly i don't know what it's like in france but i think in general the approach should always be where possible if you have been the victim of genuine sexual violence then the 1st step should always be to try and resolve that in well firstly if it is genuine sexual violence you should go to the police and attempt to revolve it resolve it in a formal setting. and if that is you know if you genuine victims of sexual violence should be told that if they do come forward and if there is a system there to cope with their complaint then they should be told that they will be treated fairly because at least in many countries in western europe they will be in the evidence suggests that you know we're pretty good at dealing with these allegations so i don't always thi

you receive a payment you don't need anybody to tell you that you receive the payment and you can validate the whole history yourself you can't you don't need to rely on 3rd parties to have charge backs and obviously you know the other killer feature of because. other than censorship resistance is this digital scarcity decentralized it will scarcely to the fact that because it is limited and its production schedule is scarce the fact that it is difficult to produce bitcoin all of these combined just a recipe for this rupture and so in the last people to save their wealth without getting getting devalued by the government because it allows people to transfer their wealth and you know decline transaction in the end is just a message it's a message you're sending to everyone else so it's impossible for me to separate you know freedom of transaction and free money from free speech which is obviously a big challenge today and it's as we've seen free speech is under attack so free money is the weapon to resist attack all right francis got a kind enough there thanks for being on the kaiser report