it's a loss for warren. her team capitalizes.lastering it on merchandise to raise min for her reelection to the senate. >> that would galvanize millions. around here. >> we're the party of opposition. that's our job. >> out spoken and unapologetic. she takes a leading role against the trump administration. >> we will band together to fight donald trump. >> it's a role she embraced when president trump was candy dade trump in the spring of 2016. >> she was listening to the indiana primary results come in. republican side. >> the take over is complete. it's trumps republican party. >> trump wins. she was so sort of appalled by this. she wrote a series of posts. that were very critical. of trump. >> days later, trump tweets back. launching a personal attack on her claim about her heritage. >> it was a realtime back and forth. >> >> she said because her cheekbones were high, that she was an indian, she was native american. >> he is kissing the fannies of the poor misunderstood wall street bankers. >> she's not happy. she's the worst.

senator warren: thank you. thank you. >> thank you so much. senator elizabeth warren!pplause] >> can we get a big hand for amy, please, for putting this all together? and you all. thank you all for the amazing questions as well. you were all amazing and vibrant, audience. appreciate you, i appreciate that woman over there. i have some thank you's to make. i want to thank the people who made it possible for us to be here today. women's donor network, way to win, thank you so much, and to our partners and also, this is not the end. she the people will be going to swing states to empower women of color all the way through november 2020. [cheers and applause] the she the people presidential forum, we already made history. i will see you in virginia on may 18, she the people down hall. go to our website, connect with the people in this room, connect to find each other and follow us at she the people. finally, and don't forget, we have music, food and drink, and the after party right behind you. i will see you there. thank you so much for joining us today. >> bye-bye! >> for

for warren, i think she would argue that that is her statement of values.same way pete buttigieg is saying, you know, i'm going to talk to voters about what i believe and how i might lead, and i'm not going to give them too much specifics, warren is saying, my specifics are my values. i think that when we -- as we proceed here, it is going to be up to the voters, which of these various ideas they are most interested in, which of these approaches they're most interested in. i think kamala harris' approach is a risky one. it is a good one to avoid getting into trouble right now in this phase of the campaign, but this democratic primary audience seems to be really interested in their candidates giving them something bold and not giving them sort of incrementalist answers. the primary voters, i should say. i mean, i think that's really important. that's why it is risky for kamala harris. but for harris and klobuchar, it could be a great general election strategy, leave the options open until you're further down in the race. >> as pointed out on twitter, when se

for elizabeth warren to be out there, kamala harris now moving that way.we also heard buttigieg move a little bit, talking about this as well. he still says i'm going to leave this up to the house and the senate but he was in a new place after reviewing the mueller report to say, hey, they should do something. that seems to me a political play that these democrats have determined is a way to enliven the base without really much risk of anything -- any downside for their campaign and quite frankly as kamala harris is saying without the notion that donald trump is really in danger of being pushed out of office in some way. >> to your point, though, on the language that senator harris used is real interesting. she is a very accomplished lawyer and she gives a lot of lawyerly answers. and that was lawyerly language. not he should be impeached, we should take the steps towards impeachment with a disclaimer that the senate probably wouldn't act on it and there were at least four other occasions during her answers when she was asked about tough questions, reparat

cnn has also learned that the warren campaign is pursuing a 50-state strategy.y, mapping out opportunities to pick up delegates in what could be a long slog to the democratic convention next summer. >> so we're going to get organized. we're going fight for working people. we're going to build a grassroots movement. and that is how i am going to be the first woman elected president of the united states of america. >> reporter: as she heads into the second quarter, warren pulling in single digits nationally, despite driving the conversation with numerous far-reaching policy ideas. he's proposed a wealth tax on the richest americans, a plan on universal child care, and called for breaking up big tech companies. and her latest proposal, ending the senate filibuster, jump-starting a debate in washington. >> when democrats next have power, we should be bold. we are done with two sets of rules! one for the republicans and one for the democrats! >> now, the campaign says it spent $5.2 million of the $6 million that it raised in the first quarter, which is a pretty high

what senator warren is ongoing every year.stimated that that plan, her plan would raise about 2.5 to $3 trillion. president trump's plan would have raised 25 to $30 trillion in one year. the magnitude of this is kind of inconceivable. we are talking about a huge wealth tax introduced when he was talking about the idea. >> there would be a lot of political obstacles to that. >> a lot of plans that he put forth have put the details haven't been worked out. my guess is that this would not have ended up like that in practice. >> it's gigantic as you point out. as democrats are talking about this, you are hearing from bill gates, warren buffett, some of the richest people in the world who are saying that they like this idea of taxing the rich. do you think it's a winning argument for democrats? >> i think it will be a really important discussion during this political cycle. there is no question that income inequality and wealth inequality are at really high levels. they are having questions about is capitalism working? there will b

senator warren that is a plan to change that. it's called real corporate profit tax, saying no matter what they owe in corporate taxes, they must pay an additional 7% on any profit over $1 million, this could bring in an estimated $1 trillion over the next ten years. this is a very ambitious plan, senator. why propose a new tax instead of closing the current loopholes and hiking up the corporate tax rates for all companies. >> i think we should do tax reform and close up a lot of the loopholes but we have a problem in front of us. pick just one corporation, amazon, for example, they reported last year $10 billion in after-tax profits publicly, to their investors, to the public, set their executive compensation based on that. that's their big number. then they turn around and say to the i.r.s. by the time we go through the loop holes, or taxable income is zero. what i'm saying is you can raise the race, but amazon would still pay zero. you can fight the fight for which loop holes need to be closed and not closed. i'm ready to figh

warren has a plan.owed us that she also has deep empathy and a real deep grasp of the structural inequalities that are race-based that affect our communities. i think she hit it out of the park. i feel her. i feel like she can hold news the palm of her hand. she can fight for us because she feels us, and that is why everyone there was so thrilled and excited to hear from her. everyone else at that forum, particularly the men in my opinion missed an opportunity to really connect with people. and she connected with our souls. it was powerful. >> and, you know, tara, it's interesting, because it's a she the people forum. so the obvious kind of natural advantage went to the women. kamala harris also as soon as she walked out, you could hear them skee weeing in the audience. she had a natural base in the audience as well and did really well. over the guy, beto o'rourke got a warm reception. beto did a good job in saying he has to earn that vote. i thought that was a very smart answer. on the other end of the

especially because elizabeth warren is a stand-out.out in any room in her career has been exceptional. mayor pete is 37 and bright. and could i think be one of her a students in the class and she's the teacher and written 11 books while we're talking about pete buttigieg loving ulysses. >> and i know you recently spoke with senator warren about gender issues in 2020 and we have a little bit of that interview. >> when you look at recent polls at top are white men. >> yeah. >> why do you think that is? >> you know, well, i don't know. all i can do is talk about my race. and talk about what it means to have a chance to get out and talk with people about the things that touch their lives. it is a great honor to be able to run for president of the united states. and a great honor to be able to talk with people about what is broken in this country, how it is that we can fix it and how we're going to build a grassroots movement to get that done. >> what i find interesting, m.j., is that when she's asked a question like that, about the role of

lee interviewed senator warren about this ambitious proposal.ve in new hampshire with more. what did you learn, m.j.? >> alisyn, elizabeth warren made a huge splash when she called on the house to begin impeachment proceedings against president trump. aides at the time said do not expect impeachment to be the central theme of her campaign going forward, that she plans to remain focused on policy. we are seeing the first real sign of that this morning. elizabeth warren putting out a major student loans and free college proposal. senator elizabeth warren out with a sweeping new proposal to wipe clean millions of americans student loan debt and overhaul the country's higher education system. the massachusetts democrat dropping the ambitious plan ahead of cnn's five-candidate young voter town hall in new hampshire. >> anyone who has outstanding student loan debt can have up to $50,000 worth of student loan debt canceled out so long as their income is under $100,000, and then it steps in up to there's no help for anybody whose family income is above

businesses around the world it is warren buffett come it is health care, 1960 corporate taxes were 4% of gdp and today it is about 2% of gdp. health care was about 5% of gdp in the 1960's and now it is 17.6% of gdp. as warren buffett says, it is not taxes, that are in entitlement, it is a distraction, but it is health care costs as we spent $3.6 trillion per year and one trillion of that is wasted, we should have more money and we should not be cutting taxes for the wealthy. it is insanity to cut these taxes. trust but verify these numbers. host: josh? guest: there is a lot of truth to that. on the first point, u.s. corporate tax rate before the police 17 law was not an impediment to u.s. corporations doing business, i agree.

elizabeth warren is calling for

right now elizabeth warren is on stage. she came out and told a story introducing herself. she did not have to do that. she got by far the wamplermest welcome of any of these candidates we've seen so far. she also came out combative against the trump administration to a big cheer. there are active iists from plad parenthood and the sierra club. these are people who have volunteered on these campaigns. i spoke to someone who said she really wanted to support elizabeth warren, but in the texas race, she volunteered for beto o'rourke. they're asking pretty targeted questions. one of the most interesting topics all these candidates hit on is reforming our democratic systems. it's not just about the policies that were put in place to get to the white house or what they would do once they get there, but it's how we change the systems and whether that's beto o'rourke saying definitely, we have to abolish the electoral college to cory booker talking about the importance of national voter registration, restoring the rights of felons or amy klobuchar saying d.c. ought to become a sta

we mentioned elizabeth warren. proposing a plan to forgive billions of dollars in student loan debt. watch. >> anyone who's got outstanding student loan debt can have up to $50,000 worth of student loan debt cancelled out, so long as their income is under $100,000. then it kind of steps in up to there's no help for anybody whose family income is above $250,000. that's it. >> dana: that's it. proposed program would cost a whopping $1.25 trillion over ten years. the plan will be funded by a 2% ultramillionaire tax on the wealthiest americans. anyone making over $50 million. let's go to our panel. a former dnc communications director. guy benson is political anchor of town hall.com. let's talk about on the merits from a policy perspective. do you like this policy or hate this policy, guy? >> i don't think it's a realistic policy. i was just reading an analysis from one of the experts at the left leaning tax policy center, who said it's wildly inefficient as an economic policy and would lead to all sorts of perverse in

warren estimates it would affect about 1,200 companies.se an additional trillion dollars often years. now her plan would add a 7% marginal tax rate on reported profits above $100 million to the taxes that a corporation already pays. it targets the worldwide profits of american corporations, not just what they make in the united states. take amazon, for example. warren estimates amazon would pay $698 million in taxes under her system in 2008 but under current laws amazon paid no federal taxes on 11.2 billion worth of profits. warren's plan is the latest in a series of proposals she releases as she makes her pitch to voters to get excited for her 20 bid. let me bring in john harwood. john, this is the puzzlement of our time. you and i, business reporters, pro capitalism. we like business. we think it gives people jobs. why have we not been able to effectively tax corporations in a way that some of the most profitable companies on the place of the earth do not pay tax? >> well, profitable companies have very good lawyers. and they have very g

that's where elizabeth warren is confusing things. >> and i think senator warren forgets the fact thatle. she says this plan, over a decade, would bring in $1 trillion, but are these companies still operating here in the u.s. in 10 years if they have to pay higher taxes because there's always a way to wiggle out of that. >> well i don't want to be in violent agreement with everybody but the only thing i think will end up happening which is almost like an alternative minimum tax for corporations not necessarily a profit tax but they may get hit with okay you pay zero taxes but you do a ton of business in the u.s. , you may get hit with a corporate amt, which again i'm worried about because remember taxes are a price for services, and if you really understand taxation, you're double taxing corporations but i am fearful that could happen. >> what's interesting is we're passing up an opportunity to comment on politics here which is why is walmart aligning itself with elizabeth warren now because we know the answer because they have an opportunity to take a shot at amazon, and where i agree

let me put up specifically what elizabeth warren's proposal does.0,000 based on your income. free undergrad tuition, invests in pell grants over ten years, creates $50 billion fund it costs $1.25 trillion over ten years. you are not convinced this is actually the best way to get kids to go to college. i absolutely think the united states should be investing more money in education, in higher education, and lots of different forms. we have been disinvesting in a long time. my concern is the way the fruit tuition is not the most targeted way to do it. if you make four-year college everyone, it's also free for bill gates' kids. their parents can afford to send them ko college. so basically you're spending the money on people who are going to go to college anyway and who can afford it. my approach to questions like this, as well as the approach as some other candidates, by the way. is a more progressive system, progressive in the technical sense. mean you have very big subsidies for and basically rich kids who can afford it, maybe full freight. those wh

buttigieg raised more money than elizabeth warren.out the warren tax plan, how everybody calls it populist, bernie sanders that is the term he would love to hear and as we know that was the term a lot of people associated with donald trump, anti-establishment. is it true? i know data from 2016 told us it was, i wonder if it still is that bernie sanders can go after, go into trump country to try to take some of those voters? do you think that's still true? >> i think he can take some of them but, that is his plan. i think what he is doing, it's smart, he is trying to get, not to win the african-american vote in the democratic primary, but win some of them. he has to win some of that demographic. if he does that, he could win the nomination n crowded field against donald trump in 2016 that helps him if there are 20 candidates. connell: don't you think the most logical argument still for the democrats, a long way to go, most logical democrats, biden from pennsylvania, tells you from scranton, biden would appeal there, would appeals last

so elizabeth warren can come in. she's a total statist.overnment to take more and get more. and make it simpler. that's not what this is doing. >> melissa: don't pile on another clause, just get rid of what it is in the first place that lets them not pay if that's what your problem is. >> carley: i do think it's interesting that elizabeth warren is talking about taxing the rich on the same week we found out she's a millionaire. >> melissa: and her solar panels, she could take a deduction. amazon took the same deduction. >> carley: there you go. a little hypocrisy there. >> ed: today deliverable >> ed: do they deliver solar panels if you are a prime member? >> harris: i don't join you guys at fox business network, but i do it at home. [laughter] doesn't make a difference to senator warren that amazon reportedly now hires, including their seasonal, 100,000 customers some 575,000 people. >> melissa: and they raise their minimum wage. >> harris: $50 for a lot of them. that should make her happy, right? democrats like that. >> ed: aoc ran amazo

elizabeth warren calculated two cents on every dollar over 50 million.ala is breaking down existics as relates to race and class. but the dude says, yeah, i'm just going to wing it. after the break, the one issue all five democrats had to address, to impeach or not to impeach. so don't go away. we'll be right back. ( cheers and applause ) ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ oh, pete!?! c'mon man. what? we said pantyhose right? here, eat this... creamy snickers®. you could use a little smoothness. pete? pete zagorin? get smooth with the fresh-ground nut butters in new creamy snickers®. want to try out my time machine? it runs on doritos. [dog barks] sure. so now what? gotta put the whole bag in. okay. yes! it's really working, jimmy! [humming, thumping] [humming] [thumping] this is the greatest moment of my life! get out of my yard! [birds chirping] jimmy? you're so old. [crunch!] it's the future! ( cheers and applause ) >> trevor: we can back to "the daily show." in the wake of the mueller report, democrats have been grappling with two questions. one, do they have to re

plus, stephen welcomes: senator elizabeth warren. and tony hale.ng jon batiste and stay human. and now, live on tape from the ed sullivan theater in new york city, it's stephen colbert! ( cheers and applause ) ♪ ♪ >> stephen: hey! going downtown! happy monday! welcome! welcome one and all, to "the late show." i'm your host, stephen colbert. now, folks-- ( cheers and applause ) how was everybody's weekend? you have a pretty good weekend? ( cheers and applause ) you had a good weekend? i had a pretty gooekend. not as good as donald trump's weekend, but still pretty good. ( laughter ) now, here's the deal. in case you don't know, in case you're coming to us from under your rock-- ( laughter ) i hope you're all sitting down. and you all are, good. ( laughter ) out there, too. because this weekend, we received some troubling news-- our president is not a russian asset. ( laughter ) now-- ( cheers and applause ) it just feels strange to say. >> jon: yeah, yeah. >> stephen: now, i say "troubling"-- i say troubling news because, if trump is not working wit

under warren's plans, they would pay close to $700 million. warren is not the only one that wants money from the powerful and wealthy. bernie sanders wants an estate tax. that could go up to 70% if you inherit something over a billion dollars. he's also calling for a death tax increase. according to kirsten gillibrand, he wants to tax trades. a 1/2% levy on stock trades and a .1% levy on bond trades. that would impact the investor and the capital markets here in the u.s. we have kamala harris. she says she wants to provide more tax credits and more credits for the lower income but reel back some of the tax cuts. in the end they're looking to soak the rich to pay for the poor. back to you. >> neil: thank you. if all of this was hurting wall street, had a funny way of showing that. democrats are looking to pay for a lot of stuff with taxes on the wealthy. at least they're saying they have to pay for that stuff. is this the answer? we have zach here and david and last but not least, mary o'grady. you crunch the numbers. this is say where you can

once again warren is trotting out a way to spend your money. i mean, i'm so offended by her entire campaign which basically hinges on giving away other people's money in ways that basically pander to groups that she needs to make -- gain traction with. her campaign is going nowhere. it is going nowhere with young people, so sure let's make college free. it is going nowhere with minorities so let's focus on the historically black colleges which by the way is really an incredible about-face. this is a woman who hates for profit schools. why? because people come out loaded with debt and they can't repay it. but black historical colleges which apparently have the same problem we want to give taxpayer money to. at some point, liberals have to acknowledge that the more micro managing of various sectors of the economy that the government does, the more disasters we have on our hand such as student loan debt. which by the way, i agree with her on this, it is a disaster. >> i think it is great she is one of the first emerging democratic candidates that

talk about your view on what you heard about elizabeth warren.ur reporting, you felt like she was the one who really did electrify this crowd along with kamala harris. >> absolutely, elizabeth warren was the last speaker of the day. it did feel like her room. you could see her leaning in to what's become the identifying thing of her campaign which is that she has a plan for that. whatever the issue is, she's got a plan for it. she's not afraid to put out specifics and not afraid in some contrast to bernie sanders and beto o'rourke to directly answer some of these questions out here, directly confront issues of racism and sexism that she has seen and she has confronted. the audience in that room really responded to what she was saying. likewise with kamala harris, i do think there's an interesting distinction here where elizabeth warren benefits from lower expectations than camera harris had in that room. this is a forum by and for women of color. everyone in that room i think wanted to see kamala harris come out and do really well and she did. wa

we saw witness and elizabeth warren take a shot at biden. taking a shot at san sers in the pages of "the new york times." this has made liberal active ifrts in the party nervous, they've been urging the candidates to muting their tacts a little bit. this feels unlikely to happen. this is a crowded race, competitive race. we'll see a lot of what our political professionals like to call drawing contrasts. we haven't seen a race this crowded in a long time. the question is going to be whether the tone of this race does weaken these candidates and what democrats hold oz their most passionate, sacred goal is defeating trump. that's what a lot of people, activists will be watching as we move forward, particularly as we led toward the first debate. >> jeff? >> joe biden has long-held presidential ambitions but never have gotten him beyond iowa. 1988 he stopped well short of that in 1987. in 2008, he stopped the day after the iowa caucuses. as he heads to iowa this week on tuesday and wednesday for stopping at least four different cities, talking to

elizabeth warren is not the kind of candidate who would build a campaign around this. this is not the way she has been campaigning thus far. she says she told me here on the air she came to that revelation after reading all the way through the report and finding evidence overwhelming. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you again on monday. it's time for the last worded with lawrence o'donnell. >> good evening, rachel. i was riveted to that interview. you took elizabeth warren through every question that we're all wondering about how did she come to this position, which she had already tweeted i think earlier today. >> this afternoon. >> she got out there right away and then that hypothetical you gave her about if you could see into the future and actually know that this process of impeachment would be actually politically harmful for democrats. >> that it wouldn't result in him being removed. >> wouldn't result in him being removed. in other words, a clinton version of impeachment is it worth doing and her answer to that was so powerful. >> solidly yes. it's the ri

no joe biden, not elizabeth warren or kamala harris.or five-way race with some of those other candidates. maybe seth moulton will take off, and we'll have the moulton/and buttigieg young veterans in their 30s. >> add tulsi gabbard to that. and amy klobuchar will be in the town hall this evening, the senator from minnesota. her argument is that she can win in trump country. she has been a very popular vote getter in minnesota, which almost went for trump, but she's won over trump counties. take a listen to her making this argument. >> i'm from the middle of the country, i'm the only one in the race that has repeatedly won trump counties and trump districts, to the point where three times in a row, i have won every single congressional district in my state, including the rural ones. >> and for democrats who want to win, that could be a compelling argument. >> and that's what she's saying, essentially, i could beat trump. that's why she's saying she could win those counties. and that's what the trump campaign and the trump white house seem

so does this report take some of the wind out of warren's sails, what do you think?> oh, david, i wish the wind comes out of the sails, i don't know where to start. look, for me, none of this has to do with student loans. this has to do with taking the successful people of this country a few pegs down and they just find places, whether it's healthcare, whether it's climate change, now this, and you've got to remember, this throwing things against the wall, hoping they stick, they didn't do their homework and all of a sudden, oops, some of the wealthy benefit from this move. obviously she's got to go back to square one and maybe try again with something else. >> well, i think gary, to take exception to that a little bit, i think the real issue is she has millennial votes here because she doesn't have them. bernie has them and some other candidates but warren does not have a millennial following. this also comes back to a misconception about student debt in this country. yes, people are burdened by student debt. this is something that i think is hindering the economy,

i do believe elizabeth warren is on to something. the other candidates have also made the same decision. they are not going to reach into pockets of big donors. instead they are going to try to stir the grass roots build the support you need across the country to win. >> dana: don't you think you need both? the mayor of south bend indiana said he's not going to take any money from fossil fuel companies, but at some point are they going to basically cut themselves off from support that they'll need. campaigning is expensive. >> very, very expensive. look, these campaigns and the candidates are being fueled by low dollar donors right now. you're right, at some point we're going to have to pay the bills. but for now, these candidates are doing the right thing. they're reaching out to the grass roots, building the kind of support they need to win the nomination. this is about winning the race for nomination. >> dana: we love having you on the show, donna brazile. we'll see you again soon. >> thank you so much. >> dana: house committee lo

elizabeth warren had a ready answer. she has done the math. she has the details that she says, at least, the math will work for. >> it is basically taxing 75,000 or so of the richest americans on, i guess, $50 million of income, 2 cents on the dollar. yeah, she explained it pretty well. i mean, she rolled it out purposefully for the students to talk about. the activity on twitter, i mean, if you saw, you know, people talking about this on twitter, i mean, twitter is, you know, a very narrow, in some ways, barometer, but a lot of excitement for elizabeth warren. people saying, oh, this is something that is poebold. she's leading the ideas primary. she's not leading in polls or fundraising, but she's certainly, i think, breaking through with the bold ideas. >> listen, i think it is great cnn is doing these. there are so many candidates. these are really necessary. i think we learn something every time. we learned that elizabeth warren went in with a plan, she executed it, she came across as passionate about it. on the other hand, kamala harris,

elizabeth warren calculated two cents on every dollar over 50 million.a is breaking down existics as relates to race and class. but the dude says, yeah, i'm just going to wing it. after the break, the one issue all five democrats had to address, to impeach or not to impeach. so don't go away. we'll be right back. ( cheers and applause ) [thinking] they made the original, hot? [thinking] hot...hot... ♪oohh, hot stuff all over my nachos♪ ♪walkin' like a taco ♪driving over potholes ♪hotter than a pot roast ♪fingers on my hot chips ♪red handed come on man ♪now i'm a need some chopsticks ♪speaking of desire babe ♪preachin' to the choir ♪man my tongue is doing fine ♪but the roof is on fire ♪tell me why ♪i never wanna hear you say ♪i want it that way the original, now it's hot. how do you get skin happy aveeno® with prebiotic oat. it hydrates and softens skin. so it looks like this... and you feel like this. aveeno® daily moisturizer get skin happy™ chili's 3our signatureents sirloin steak. aged to perfection and served with a starter and drink for just $10. di

her approach seems to be maybe in the middle of buttigieg and warren. here she was from last night. >> do you believe that americans should have the right to vote at age 16? >> i'm really interested in having that conversation. >> senator, yes, or no, do you support financial reparations. >> i support we should study it. >> and elizabeth warren is here and she said she supports student loan forgiveness for 42 million americans. would you go that far? do you support that. >> i support anything about reducing the debt of student loans and that is an important conversation to have. >> but people who are in -- convicted in prison, like the boston marathon bomber on death row, people who are convicted of sexual assault, they should be able to vote? >> i think we should have that conversation. >> all right. so she said, her answer, we should have that conversation. but is she, david, missing a chance to have that concrete answer, set the time now and how do you think those responses are playing with voters? >> well, i mean, those specific responses just last

and elizabeth warren unveils another major proposal. this one eliminating student debt and making public college free. stay with us. 't accept an incomplete job from any one else. so why accept it from your allergy pills? most pills don't finish the job because they don't relieve nasal congestion. flonase allergy relief is different. flonase relieves sneezing, itchy, watery eyes and a runny nose, plus nasal congestion, which pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. and 6 is greater than 1. start your day with flonase for more complete allergy relief. flonase. this changes everything. about the colonial penn program. here to tell you if you're age 50 to 85 and looking to buy life insurance on a fixed budget, remember the three p's. what are the three p's? the three p's of life insurance on a fixed budget are price, price, and price. a price you can afford, a price that can't increase, and a price that fits your budget. i'm 65 and take medications. what's my price? you can get coverage for

is it elizabeth warren or far left like ilhan omar. >> elizabeth warren is far left?ation. neil: i wish we had more time. blessedly we do not. thank you all very much. getting quick bulletins of the president meeting with south korea's leader. he is optimistic he can continue to make progress with the north koreans. he is saying right now he did not in talks with north korea but certain things are very good. has not outlined what the certain things are. hope springs eternal. when we get the pool spray we will. more after this. i had a coach. math. ooh. so, why don't traders have coaches? who says they don't? coach mcadoo! you know, at td ameritrade, we offer free access to coaches and a full education curriculum- just to help you improve your skills. boom! mad skills. education to take your trading to the next level. only with td ameritrade. whoooo. did you know the exact same hotel room... ...can have many different prices? that's why tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites to find the lowest price on the hotel you want. your perfect hotel room for the perfect pr

elizabeth warren says now is the time to begin. yes or no, do you agree with that?> i think there is no question that impeachment must be on the table. there's a process. you know, elizabeth warren, i respect her tremendously, but he's not on the house judiciary committee. we actually have to do the work. we are still in the evidence gathering phase. we want to make sure we have everything we need. but there is no question that this is very serious, and the prospect of impeachment has significantly increased based on the contents of the mueller report. we can only imagine what's in the unredacted portions of this report. we have to approach this soberly, but i think it is very important that the house recognize that this is a moment where not only the country is watching, but the world is watching. we're seeing rule of law being undermined, free press being undermined, authoritarian governments rising. this is a moment where america has to show by our example that the constitution matters, the rule of law matters, and no one is above the law. and we need to move for

but elizabeth warren was leading the charge. late last week, she said she believes the president should be impeached. last night at the cnn town halls she suddenly has company from senator kamala harris. let's watch. >> the tools we are given for that accountability is the impeachment process. this is not about politics. this is about principle. >> i believe congress should take the steps towards impeachment. >> i think he's made it pretty clear he deserved impeachment. i'll leave it to the -- i'm also going to leave it to the house and senate to figure that out. >> so you heard mayor buttigieg saying he's going to leave it to the house and senate. that's one of the luxuries when you're running for president of not serving in the house and senate, that you don't have to take a vote on this. it is an open question, if senator warren is trying to get attention from the left, the progressives, if you will, or she actually firmly believes that there should be impeachment proceedings. because we heard a different argument from senato

senator elizabeth warren has released a sweeping proposal to eliminate student loan debt for tens of americans and make all college tuition free. we'll bring you the details next. you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. so why accept it from your allergy pills? most pills don't finish the job because they don't relieve nasal congestion. flonase allergy relief is different. flonase relieves sneezing, itchy, watery eyes and a runny nose, plus nasal congestion, which pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. and 6 is greater than 1. start your day with flonase for more complete allergy relief. flonase. this changes everything. like.. pnc easy lock, so you can easily lock your credit card when its maximum limit differs from its vertical limit. and clover flex, for when you need to take credit cards when no one carries cash. or requesting a call to help get a new credit card- one that hasn't followed the family goldfish. pnc - make today the day. >>> all right. major news just out from the supreme court this morning. justic

meanwhile elizabeth warren has cold for impeachment proceedings to begin.n say they will unveil a civilian government this weekend. it's part of a bid to put pressure on the transitional military council, which seized power from long—time president omar al—bashir last week. the move comes as thousands of demonstrators gathered in the centre of the capital, khartoum, in the biggest protests since mr bashir was forced from power. our africa editor, fergal keane, reports. whatever happens next, they'll remember this for the rest of their lives. a moment to look back on in old age, when freedom was close enough to touch. arriving in this crowd, it's the discipline, the civility which are striking. "raise your arms and we'll gently search you", they chant. every inch of room is taken and into this unexpected space are flowing the demands of the many. these are lawyers. "this is temporary change", iqbal says, "and the forces of freedom have given their demands to the military council, to form a civilian government." we went to visit the radio of the revolution, b

we've heard elizabeth warren up to this point has really reignited it certainly on the campaign trailher decision to go out there and say that she thinks that the president should be impeached, the house should start moving forward with impeachment proceedings, is going to force the other candidates to have to weigh in on it. now, we've heard some things, but we really haven't heard definitive answers up to this point, wolf. >> very interesting, speaking of elizabeth warren, phil, the senator, she'll be on the stage tonight during the 8:00 p.m. eastern hour. her campaign has just unveiled a truly sweeping proposal involving student loan debt, as well as free tuition to all public colleges across the united states. what more have you learned? >> yeah, wolf, it's in keeping with what senator warren has been doing throughout the course of her campaign, rolling out sweeping progressive, further reaching than any other candidate in the campaign, types of proposals. this one specifically would actually go through dual prong. you've heard a lot about democrats talking about free college, fre

everyone's going to have to follow elizabeth warren, do you agree with elizabeth warren?hort-term it's a tactical advantage, could there be this weekend one of these democratic candidates that's brave enough to say "i'm not for impeachment." >> dan: it will crush them in the primaries. >> donna: who is going to stand up and say "i want to protect my country from foreign influence." he attempted to do it. he protected the country, he did not have bipartisan support. >> jesse: he was the president of the united states. >> donna: had he tipped the scales, everyone would've complained that he was tipping the scale in favor of hillary clinton by not going public. this report, the second volume paints a picture of a white house riddled with this function and distrust and it says the president pressed his aides to lie to the public. that is one area democrats will want to investigate. >> greg: that's an opinion and a description of how somebody is, it's not a crime, it's not against the law and its meaning most in the scheme of things. he didn't break the law. absence of evidenc

warren's new plan addresses free public college tuition. warren plans to invest $100 billion into pell grants for students who need money in addition to that. warren also plans to allocate $50 billion to fund black colleges and universities. how does she plan to pay for all of this? it's going to be a one time cost of $640 billion -- >> just one time. >> not repeated. she says it would be paid for through her proposed wealth tax. it's a 2% tax that would be imposed on families that make over $50 million. >> and that's a big difference. remember when we saw during the obama administration confusion over what is the 1%, he's not talking about the 1%, she's talking about the .001%. john harwood is back with us. you could love or hate elizabeth warren, but from a policy perspective, it's stunning how heavy on policy she's going. but in terms of student debt, would this actually address the problem and that's the price of college these days. you could wipe out people who have this existing student loan -- >> education still costs money. >> an en

elizabeth warren. think what you have is a lot democratic candidates who are not hearing as much on the campaign trail from democratic voters about impeachment as they are hearing about other things and voters wanting them to talk about issues, and, so, that is what they're doing. and then you get to congress where they are trying to figure out how to do this without seeming like it is ovely political process. so democrats are -- and led by indianapolis o -- nancy pelosi n this are saying we'rgoing to keep investigating. several said we don't want president trump to get away with this or feel e he has a blank check, but they don't want to use the word impeachment, nancy pelosi doesn't want to launch impeachment proceedings. she said you can do a lot of things short of that and get the information. >> it feels like a slow-moving mueller 2.0 report we're doing. so the house is going to call up the attorney general, obviously subpoenaing don mcghan, and bringing up bob mueller, and the theory is maybe one

similarh warren shares issues. fromrs wants to shift away the capitalist model. other democratic candidates and betoamala harris o'rourke. both are seen as more moderate than sanders and warren, especially when it comes to economic policy. they have been criticized for not taking clear positions on a number of issues. they have relied on individual donatitions to f fund their campaign. >> they have changed the equation and could keep them in thee race along after voting begins. >> one democratic candidate who will not rely on individual donations is joe biden. he has the backing of the democratic party establishment. >> the islands officially closed saturday a and sunday. overseas videos -- overseas food andll receieive lodgings. watching "live from paris. calmuel macron bids to yellow vests protetesters. a new silkcussed road. china says it is a win-win project. say a minister in the email bombings was killed in the -- in the easter bombings was killed in the blast. >> friday march t the opening of this forum in beijing. and road d initiative has for coal-fired

you took elizabeth warren through every question that we're all wondering about how did she come to this position, which she had already tweeted i think earlier today. >> this afternoon. >> she got out there right away and then that hypothetical you gave her about if you could see into the future and actually know that this process of impeachment would be actually politically harmful for democrats. >> that it wouldn't result in him being removed. >> wouldn't result in him being removed. in other words, a clinton version of impeachment is it worth doing and her answer to that was so powerful. >> solidly yes. it's the right thing to do because it's the right thing to do. let the chips fall where they may. it's interestinging to -- you and i cover these guys and know all these candidates not only for how they're running but how they have campaigned and the kinds of people they are. i would not have expected that warren would be the one coming out and saying impeachment is the right thing to do. it's so distant from the campaign she's running but she made a case she's moved by the evidence.