created in the soviet union and then were produced under license in the countries of the former warsaw pact or were created on the chassis based on such machines unfortunately, almost all over the world, we have already been able to use what we have been able to use to the maximum, and now the question arises that we need to use what they will give us, well, in reality, only those countries will be able to give us which have a fairly large amount of combat equipment in real time, this is primarily the united states of america, this is primarily great britain, france, and all because even germany, if you take the same cougars that they had in storage on its restoration of their combat capability must be spent quite seriously of western production, this is armor protection of at least a frontal projection against 30-mm armor-piercing shells of soviet equipment, this is circular protection of at least 14.5 mm, and this 30-35 caliber gun is 40 mm, so with modern fire control systems that's a great piece of equipment that, in principle , is needed in large quantities already and immediately. vla

, but then there is no warsaw pact.ending hundreds and thousands of kilometers from the line that was clear to everyone, just decides. now we will defend here, then we will defend there. here they announced that nato is now, as a defensive forest, responsible for the security of the indocas of the pacific region, as they put it, that is, the next line of defense of nata's line of defense will be the south china sea. i don't have any doubts . so these are the ones i talked about this at the session today. how long will it last, but this situation, i will not guess on this topic, and the president was asked, he answered that we see our goals, which were announced, we are working to achieve these goals of humanity in tiktok. now the current we have, yes, about the european union and sex. tanks reuters we have heard russia's explanation for the index invasion of russia into ukraine but what is the purpose of the game to overthrow the government in kiev and how much pressure china is putting on russia in this war he can not.

mykola that the bmp-1, which was in service with the countries of the warsaw pact, is a fairly good optionor the armed forces of ukraine. if we are talking about western equipment, it seems to me that the best option is the m2 bradley, first of all, because the united states has a lot of them in storage and this is the m113 e-e armored personnel carrier, which is also in huge quantities in the e-e armed forces’ storage the forces of nato countries, that is, in our case, first of all, we need to focus not on weapons, but on protection, protection and passability, because here is a video from makspro and it really shows that these are machines that are not intended to act as defense transporters of infantry fighting vehicles, and the same m113, which has excellent cross-country ability, which has a good reservation, it would be quite appropriate because the armed forces of ukraine have very, very many divisions that are forced to step on a vehicle and for them it is an armored car that also has a good patency would be a very wonderful reinforcement. well, if we are already talking about weap

but now we've moved that line 1200 miles to the east and incorporated all these former warsaw pact states into our alliance and in fact we've even from the russian point of view by bringing the baltic into naito, we've left the russian mini province, kaliningrad behind, nato's lines between, the baltic sea, lithuania and poland. and we've seen the controversy over lithuania. you inspecting and closing the railway between russia. are really belarus and kaliningrad. to the russians and could see how that could lead to a major conflict right there right on the border with our nato's ally, poland. and conflict with our nato allies in the baltic. now and then, of course in ukraine. major part of the controversy. america, first of all, promising official aid to bring ukraine into naito, which biden reiterated in september and october of last year, helping lead to the russian build up and then the but also as said in the new york times explicitly, the de facto integration of naito, the normalization of their military and integration of its systems in with the united states and the rest of naito.

nato warsaw pact secretary general to the last believed in the friendliness of the west and now it isferently. he changed world politics a unique event when a person is over 6 years old. becoming a leader can change politics throughout the world, gorbachev believed to the last that perestroika had to be completed and that his life's work was alive and that new thinking and, in general , publicity, as he imagined it. that was all right, and now they didn’t give him, so you say some kind of evolution here. not necessary gorbachev announced non-interference in the affairs of the gdr and a year later the berlin wall was gone. he was applauded, foreign leaders said goodbye. today came only the ambassadors of the united states of britain germany france and the only foreign leader who was not afraid and came personally was the hungarian prime minister viktor orban, as gorbachev's comrades-in-arms say, with all his heart he wanted to build a new, more perfect soviet union, because in the old one he did not like a lot of emergency economic reforms and deficit costs, empty shelves in stores, a

he was prepared to let the warsaw pact lives. i don't think— let the warsaw pact lives. the soviet union, because he was a man of the _ soviet union, because he was a man of the soviet— soviet union, because he was a man of the soviet union. but the post gorbachev, which happened very quickly. — gorbachev, which happened very quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim _ quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim of— quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim of a — quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim of a coup when he went on vacation — victim of a coup when he went on vacation in — victim of a coup when he went on vacation in crimea. it was a very, very— vacation in crimea. it was a very, very difficult _ vacation in crimea. it was a very, very difficult time for him and i think— very difficult time for him and i think that _ very difficult time for him and i think that no one has ever seen what happened _ think that no one has ever seen what happened to a society that has been a totalitarian society, in which everyone _ a totalitarian society, in which everyone

orders in accordance with the general plan of military operations against the countries of the warsaw pactawal from building facilities for the supply of energy, water, gas and food; creating bases for deploying groups of mass terror special forces and organizing detachments to fight the existing regime. by what means were these measures supposed to be carried out with the most modern ones, including in theoretical weapons? never believed the possibility of such a war did not believe. i am a scout in a radical way to resolve all international contradictions. it's my job not to follow orders. i could not. and in political i didn't really care about political goals at the time. convenient position he ordered, and we are pawns, so it turns out, what is it? after all, it was only now for the first time that i seriously began to think about my life, that it was a walking possibility. you mean, the arrest wasn't quite a few earlier. farewell to me, my father spoke. and the last of the kind you were forced to be surprised. secretly, under a false name, i still envy you. that i could i would now b

let the warsaw pact loose.a man of— mean in the soviet union because he was a man of the soviet union. but the post— was a man of the soviet union. but the post gorbachev, which happened very weekly, he didn't expect to be the victim — very weekly, he didn't expect to be the victim of a coup when he went on vacation _ the victim of a coup when he went on vacation in _ the victim of a coup when he went on vacation in crimea. it was a very, very— vacation in crimea. it was a very, very difficult _ vacation in crimea. it was a very, very difficult time for him and i think— very difficult time for him and i think no— very difficult time for him and i think no one has ever seen what happened — think no one has ever seen what happened to a society that's been a totalitarian society in which everyone is turned on everyone else and you _ everyone is turned on everyone else and you have this central kgb history— and you have this central kgb history where anyone could be denounced and sent away. suddenly, that structure

we here, within the framework of the warsaw pact, should be friends with everyone. yes? poles are different. let's be different , but we see that the aggression on the part of our western neighbor, it is clearly for us now for the belarusians. not that the time has come to remember with us, but it has formed this hmm desire for justice, and a demonstration of this memory, and our children are our youth. and when we talk about this interwar period and the period from 22 years. uh, by the thirty-ninth year, we must be aware. uh. what damage did you do more? eh, the belarusian people are not in belarus as in the country, yes, namely the belarusian people, because the belarusian people. he is now. uh, if so, he says it is located on the territory, for example, and the belostochnaya is our territory, no matter how, whoever said it, now they will be called into poles there. yes, after seeing our transmission, but in reality it was so. look and gave this territory. look how strong our movement was. eh, it was precisely in the twenties that the patriots of the belarusians were w

with the orders within the countries of the warsaw pact and the prospects for the unification of germanyective anti-capitalist bloc, alas, perestroika failed long before august of the ninety-first year. the political economic crisis did not fall from the sky, but was the result of the consistent actions of the policies of gorbachev and his government. he deliberately abandoned authoritarian levers of government from democratic did not work or worked for the collapse of a shoemaker without boots inside the country, gorbachev ceded almost all power to yeltsin and the leader of the republics. hoping for the support of western friends probably. gorbachev was then seriously sure that without him, the republican provincials. still, nothing will work. and i even wanted to be elected president of the renewed ussr, apparently counting on the success of yeltsin's place of gratitude, other republican leaders were looking for and found a moment to get rid of him and become sovereign rulers. was it really possible to expect something different from them ? they say that history puts everything in its

, it was also proposed to dissolve the warsaw pact.y, but of course, they took it all as a fantasy. kohl urged that a united germany still join nato, and after all , we had huge real estate there, there was an edrome, small towns. there, by the way, not so to speak, a building , a structure, and so on, and our troops, which were successfully withdrawn, they were not, so to speak, prepared from the point of view of their arrangement here on their native land. all this hmm, so to speak, here is such a spontaneity that caused great harm to the country went to arkhyz there was no security council there was no commission on foreign affairs, the supreme councils had no powers there were no meetings. well, at least the expert community. he went all the way there, and behold interesting response narcissist. as a shlagman, he flew from arkhyz to brussels and said, we need to implement agreements that are worthy of yours and as quickly as possible, when until the concrete-heads in moscow figure out what it is about? and when he returned, we real

only together with others, therefore, when it comes to providing old soviet tanks that were in the warsaw pact countries, manufactured in poland or romania, then it is ok, but to send german leopard tanks named after certain animals, which became a tradition in germany regarding the second it also echoes the history of the world, which confuses berlin. so, in addition to historical reasons, there is also a desire not to outpace the americans due to the unwillingness to appear as the initiator of a belligerent policy towards russia, even if it requires a modern policy of deterrence, because not only the usa but also other key players france, italy, great britain, they have also not yet decided to provide western armored vehicles, but as soon as the usa, france or britain start sending their tanks, it will open a debate in berlin, and the international agency of atomic energy reported that the second reserve power transmission line was restored at the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. on september 9, due to shelling from the nuclear power plant, the only one was disconnected from the energy syst

military-strategic detente in the 1980s or something, we at one time voluntarily dissolved the warsaw pactanizations, depriving nato of the meaning of its existence, supported the reunification of germany without any conditions and, contrary to the position of london and paris, we removed the armed forces. forces from europe, asia, latin america recognized the independence of the former soviet republics and believed the promises of the leaders. the west does not expand nato by an inch to the east . and when the process started, they agreed to actually legitimize it through the conclusion russia's founding act over. maybe we violated the interests of the west by warning them of the acceptability of approaching, threatening military infrastructure, close to our border. in the west , american exceptionalism acquired a particularly destructive character after the end of the cold war. back in 1991, deputy pentagon chief paul wolfowian, in a conversation with the commander of the joint forces of nato in europe, wesley clark, frankly admitted that i was quoting after the end of the cold war. we c

created in the soviet union and then the polytensies were produced in the countries of the former warsaw pactreated on the chassis based on such machines. unfortunately, almost everywhere world, we have already been able to use what we were able to use to the maximum, and now the question arises that we need to use what we will be given , well, in reality, only those countries that have a sufficiently large amount of it will be able to give us in real time of combat equipment, it is primarily the united states of america, it is primarily great britain and france. that is probably all because even germany

organization that was created in opposition to nato, or let's say as a successor, as it were, to the warsaw pact the meeting of the heads of state, the self-proclaimed president of belarus lukashenko spoke about strengthening the agreement on collective security to oppose this collective measure, they say that now they are not united enough, let's recall how lukashenko said about this that if we immediately acted as a united front, there would be no such hell how they speak sans look at how mona lipno votes and acts european union how strong they have within the block discipline it extends automatically even to those who do not agree with the decisions made on the site vopros who prevents us from using this block resource here is the snow we need to take in an example of a single one, we will simply be crushed and torn apart. in january, i warned that the main goal of certain external forces is to undermine the stability of the evolutionary path of development all over the soviet space, they started with belarus, then the infection spread to kazakhstan, now it's russia's turn. well, as we see, p

what he have dissolved nato in the wake of the warsaw pact? i don't think so it all. -- at all. but what he might not have done would be pushing nato east of where it was. when the soviet union dissolved. he was a -- he would have understood based on wartime experience the sensitivity of bumper zones and things like that that americans don't like to take into account of a foreign policy. how far he would have pushed nato east is something i am skeptical about. i saw that on the 62 trip. this is one of my indelible impressions of him. touring the nato round, so to speak -- realm so to speak. it is impossible for me to imagine that he would have ever entertained the idea of dissolving the relationships, the bonds we forged in world war ii. i think emotionally he felt as deeply for the areas he served overseas as he felt about his own country and loved his own country. i think that the idea of nato as a community would have been. i hope that is responsive. we have a issue now. the war in ukraine. we are spurred by the spectacle of ukrainian assistance demonstrating the ukrainian --

the warsaw pact states should decide about their own state. one from the 19 perspective. gorbachev, 89 in 1990 and gorbachev africa, exclusively into foreclosure, to him, supported him. that noise of the right to choose himself. his watch when he met george bush. he made this by the far monica from at home with court in his summit meeting with helmet, calling the northern caucasus. it is summer. night 99. he approved 5 nato membership of the future unified germany on 5 at the end of 2 world wars in nuclear and actually nuclear to terran, it defined these and decades. but there, we found a peaceful change, something that were there for me, for me either in the thought look like looking back historically was inside the something we are. so i'm very lucky and grateful for me. if i go about it was dunc bob lies something that we will remain grateful for. michelle. gorbachev always mid xining finance provides offline is a willingness to pull the sheet reconciliation, which one achieved reconciliation between germany and russia. but the future of ge

point, eh, we only see old soviet-style equipment that was used in the countries of the former warsaw pactch was supposed to install the s300 system, but we know that there is a somewhat difficult situation now in the aegean sea ​​and from turkey and, accordingly, so far greece does not supply us, but in general we use all these means that we had in service or that were transferred to the soviet

of organization that was was created in opposition to nato, or let's say as a successor to the warsaw pact the meeting of the heads of state, the self-proclaimed president of belarus, lukashenko, spoke about strengthening the collective security agreement in order to counter this collective action. how hellish they say sansa, look at how mona lipno votes and acts in the european union, how strong is their intra-block discipline it spreads automatically even to those who do not agree with the decisions made in the council, the question is who prevents us from using this block resource, here is the snow. we need to take an example one by one . there is an undermining of stability, a violation of the evolutionary path of development throughout the soviet space, they started with belarus, then the infection spread to kazakhstan, now it's russia's turn. well, as we see in problems are created in armenia and there is no need to think that someone will bypass the side. well, we see how putin and lukashenko are trying to create the illusion of this unity , at least on the example of the same kazak

he was prepared to let the warsaw pact lives.t was important to him, the economy in russia needed attention. i say russia, i do mean in the soviet union, because he was a man of the soviet union. but the post gorbachev, which happened very quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim of a coup when he went on vacation in crimea. it was a very, very difficult time for him and i think that no one has ever seen what happened to a society that has been a totalitarian society, in which everyone has turned on everyone else and you have this central kgb chequered history where anybody at any time can be denounced and sent away. that structure, political, economic and social disappears, i think it makes people a little crazy. and after a while they begin to want the comfort of what was, even if what was was really kind of awful. i think that what happened post gorbachev in russia, was that people gravitated ultimately towards the strong man, the strongman being the guy who was in berlin when he didn't send the tanks in and not even as the

nineties, that was made possible thanks to our position, lucy, for that we voluntarily resolved the warsaw pact organization. was that your mind essentially depriving nato its purpose, that we supported the reification of germany. we really were on conditionally and against the positions of london and paris. what school we withdrew troops from europe, asia, and latin america. that we recognize the independence of the former soviet problems and you know, jewish was pushed in the we trusted the promises made by western leaders not to expand nato. you will for east where you even by an interested in from and when the process went on anyway, assume we agreed to actually legitimize advice finding the nato, russia founding act. and you put a human to mr. did we violate west and interest as a by warning them against the unacceptability some goodness of moving federal miller transfer structure to on boarded sheets in this? but i believe the arrogance of the western american exceptionalism became particularly destructive after the end of the cold war. back in 19191 deputy pentagon chief hol, fluids, beg

this process was called the autumn of peoples, then in most countries of the warsaw pact there was ammunist regimes fell one after another more, hungary east germany czechoslovakia bulgaria and romania all those who were still in the fifties part of the european military socialist union with the leading role of the ussr abandoned it completely, turning back the soviet government watched the collapse of communism in eastern europe in silence, allowing the former allies to decide their own internal affairs such a policy will be called the doctrine of the senators at the end of october 1989 in helsinki, the press departed the ussr foreign ministry gerasimov officially announced that the brezhnev doctrine is dead. instead, he quipped, we will have the doctrine of the senatra , by this we mean, the last line of the song i did it my way, so the soviet union allowed the neighboring state to choose its own path, losing sight of the fact that very soon the soviet republics themselves would want their own path in contradictions between peoples grew getting stronger. first calls. we went from t

regime fell, everything happened to the soviet union, when it collapsed , the organization of the warsaw pactpsed, and democratic governments came to power in eastern european countries, communism did not pass judgment the essence of communism is not branded as evil, just as it happened with hitler's nazism, well, this is the first circumstance that did not allow, let's say so, historians in the west, let many historians in eastern europe say their unequivocal word on this matter. and the next point is of a purely formal nature it is absolutely clear, but from a legal point of view, war was not declared for the soviet union. it was a so-called liberation campaign or an offensive operation, or using the modern russian naveya spetszap-operation a-a poland instead, the polish leaders announced only the following declarations of a political nature, calling it a blow in the back or soviet aggression, the word war from the poles did not sound, they also did not declare war on the soviet union and the polish allies of great britain, france, therefore, this is the period from 39 to 41 soviet the worl

force in the entire space of the globe, and that since there is no soviet union, there is no the warsaw pactk. china means you can do whatever you want. exactly, and from there, and in these times on this date in the ninety-first year, vladimir putin, like many people in our country and throughout the space, see, and the cause is the source of all current problems, including. convinced for the choice of millions of residents in the donetsk and luhansk people's republics in the zaporozhye and kherson regions, our common destiny and a thousand-year history , people passed on this spiritual connection to their children and grandchildren, despite all the trials they carried through years of love for russia and no one can destroy this feeling in us. that is why both the older generations and the youth, those who were born after the tragedy of the collapse of the soviet union, voted for our unity for our common future in 1991 in goloveshskaya pushcha, without asking the will of ordinary citizens, representatives of the then party elites decided on the collapse of the ussr and people overnight turn

countries is also limited due to this, the complexes were not distributed among the countries of the warsaw pactso we primarily have to count on western aid in the short term, that is, the complexes that are now being supplied, well, they are more against aviation and if there are more powerful american complexes, e.e., like khaot, e.e., someday ukraine will get it. maybe the issue of combating ballistic targets will be solved somehow, as long as we understand that this problem is will be preserved, that is, if the issue of barrage ammunition there, the same iranian ways, it will be resolved, the fight against guided missiles, it is clear what to do, and the means that they are one or another, with one or another effectiveness, this issue will be resolved the fight against ballistic missiles is now for us, well, let's say so, it can have a limited result, and only the russians can come to our aid here, and if we are talking about the operational-tactical level of these systems, the number is quite limited, a significant part already was used in the first seven months of the war, that is, if you

about tanks of the t-72 type, and even more so those that were manufactured by the countries of the warsaw pactve slightly worse characteristics and even from the soviet 172s, and the t-72 in itself is not a good tank, in principle, that is, it is not the best among the soviets, at the same time when we are talking , for example, about such a tank as leopard two or abrams? it is necessary to understand that this is the difference. the same, for example, as between the abstract howitzer d-20 of the soviet era, which is still 50 years old, and the american m-3-sevens of stepan alloys or, well, any such comparison. that is, this technique is already new level of a new generation that provides a completely new the level of capabilities and in fact even a smaller number of these machines can achieve a much greater result and they are better protected, so here we are talking about just ideas and, let's talk directly about the survival of the crew, even such a situation is extremely important, so it is about getting modern machines, sir well, let's continue this topic, but if you said , you said that

the warsaw pact and actually this is a key moment, the baltics and poles, well, above all, the balticsd even the fims say this is a threat, russian tourists should not wander around europe when their army is killing ukrainians, which means western europe is old europe , the french and germans say no, we are supporters of the transformational role of these troops, because the russians come to europe, look at freedom, democracy and return. and they try to implement it there, and they actually ignore their own empirical experience. for 30 years, russian the federation was welcome, it was welcomed in various formats, including by citizens who traveled around europe, but for some reason we actually see a fascist state where a small layer of russians actually speak out, or do they even have the courage to somehow master this fallow of fascists and genocidal of this war. and by and large, somewhere somewhere, 76% of russians support the conduct of this so-called special military operation, this study of the lion to the center was made public just a couple of days ago, and more half of the rus

only the means of the old soviet growth that were used in the countries of the former warsaw pact are coming to us. now, by the way, a situation has arisen with america and greece which was supposed to deliver the s300 system, but we know that there is a somewhat difficult situation in the aegean sea with turkey, and accordingly, greece does not supply us, but in general we use all these means that we had in service or that were transferred of the soviet model from our partners, well separately of course, there are short-range means - these are manpads or the german cheetah systems, which are used to cover ground troops, in particular, during counteroffensive actions. now i wanted to ask you again. but at the same time, the adviser the head of the president's office, mykhailo podalyak, says that the response of other countries to russian attacks on critical infrastructure, and he specifically means the t-5, should be the delivery of air defense systems, and what else can we hope for ? systems and from which countries, as of today, we know that the samsung system is to be delivered. an

what a difference warsaw pact domination has become an advocacy ration approach.won that's ' bout i'm running. in general, i would have doubted a little, because let's still let's figure it out. i agree that information wars carry great danger and move great things. the number of people aged 13 and 14-15 who, whether due to appropriate upbringing or an appropriate general level of education, are not considered serious literature of the channel? yes, but there will be no banner on the dragstam, no information war will raise in a stag, the normal yegorov will raise it when he reaches the future, because let's look at the result after all. we are in the process now. yes, we are actually in the process and starting breaking about the fact that nato won, as i understand it, yes, i know that you have enough strength so that you raise the knowledge of the restag set the task of destroying the inside to create socio-political instability. our main problem. a serious technical lag in the control of the world media space, and not control the world media space, cut off the u

we lived in a 15-story building plus there was a warsaw pact, and we didn't want to.e was also celebrated on the 17th , there are seventeenth streets. here i lived in grodno there and so on. yes, i wondered what kind of street september 17 is to its big, unfortunately. i, too, have not been very advanced in this matter. then she appeared there on october 24 , when the contract was. and then it was canceled back so as not to disturb. a country that is part of the warsaw pact, which is our ally, where our troops are stationed, and so on, and we ourselves were pleased with this. they didn't please with this not a fifteen-story building, nor the warsaw treaty. they were doing their job. and when they were released. they said no more going into the woods and taking up arms. let's get started work with young people hmm power verticals and they moved. you see descendants. who is now led by the schols, there and so on, this shushara in the baltic states, the same ukraine, and then, when the boiling point came, 70 years have passed , how many there are 8 years? but all these d

in 1958, after the collapse of the warsaw pact, the poles decided that they had simply been deceiveduling party. trying to divert the attention of the polish voters from the failed economic policy of the government, matesh borovitsky . it's not even about a specific area. poland is demanding some abstract land, back in 2005, refusing the monetary compensation that the czech republic offered and will probably refuse now, because the subject works too well to attract voters who should vote in parliamentary elections in a year in britain began a ten-day farewell to elizabeth ii condolences in connection with the death of the queen expressed president vladimir putin, having sent a telegram to the new king charles iii, this is the name that the former prince charles will bear on the throne an hour ago, the new king made his first appeal to the nation, telling what will change in the country in the near future, changes are waiting for the royal family itself, but they will please not all about why prince harry left balmoral castle first from london report by our own correspondent alexander

here, current in the current format with the warsaw pact, when the state there has a certain level.tary coherence military training and ready to respond to any security challenges. and here, but in general, this sco is not nato. this is not the alliance that will be engaged in militarization, that is, this is an alliance that is engaged in, but in ensuring security and, uh, combating threats based on, just the same , cooperation between countries , that is, the direction that belarus has chosen today, it cannot even be called tactical, it is super strategic. well, that is, the economy, i always say the economy as the basis, but now the economy is connected with politics and security, so the sco is like such a universal organization. it is just the same unites, and these three a-a basic, uh, moment. well, plus one more. i can humanitarian cooperation, which is such a common platform, the ground on which the economy and politics will develop and safely. thank you for the conversation antonov sergeevich we had an analyst at the belarusian institute of strategic research. anton dudarenk

we lived in a fifteen-story building plus there was a warsaw pact, and we didn't want to.y day. it was also celebrated on the seventeenth and there are streets on the seventeenth. here i lived in grodno there and so on. yes, i was surprised what kind of street september 17 is , to my great regret. i don't either has made great progress in this area. then she appeared there on october 24, when the contract was. and then it was canceled back so as not to disturb. a country that is part of the warsaw pact, which is our ally, where our troops are stationed, and so on, and we ourselves were pleased with this. they did not appease this, not with a fifteen-story building, not with the warsaw treaty. they did their job, and when they were released, and they said, no more need to go into the forest and take up arms. let's start working with the youth hmm power vertical, and they were moving. you see descendants. who is now led by the schults, there and so on, this riff-raff in the baltic states, the same ukraine, and then, when the boiling point came, 70 how many years have passed

after all, it was with the announcement of the dissolution of the warsaw pact that his career began.olitics from hungary and only gorbachev instantly stopped support for eastern europe how did he withdraw troops from there? how the entire global balance of power collapsed and a balance of interests took its place, all this redrawn the map of the world forever and was a very painful shock for everyone who continued to believe , you can discuss for as long as you like how gullible he was and how he was deceived with the expansion of nato to the east, but after all, this is also proof that they played their game with him, what happened was what he described in zhizinsky in the late eighties soviet union an empire that we must destroy because it will always be a threat to us and life in the eighty-ninth was sure that the most intense conflicts in the world would take place in the soviet union, this would be the process of the final victory, nationalism over communism. so it happened, and the bialowieza agreements were precisely the victory of the nationalists who were in a hurry to come

what is the difference between the warsaw pact .al advocacy approach who won and who won that's 'bout i'm running. in general, i would doubt a little, because let's still estimate. i agree that information wars carry great danger and move great things. the number of 13- and 14-15-year-old teenagers who, whether due to appropriate upbringing or an appropriate general level of education, are not considered serious literature of the channel? yes but no information war will raise the banner of the reichstag to us in a stag, the normal yegorov will raise it when he reaches the future, because let's look at the result after all. we are in the process now. yes, we are actually in the process and are starting to break the cube that says that nato has won, as i understand it, yes, when they know that you have enough strength to raise your knowledge with a restag, they set the task of destroying it from the inside to create socio-political instability. our main problem. serious technical lag in control media space of the world, and do not con

eastern europe was loaded onto trains and tanks were brought to us all there, well, this is from the warsaw pactand bc artillery and so on. everything was drawn to the donbass tell everything about it. it came from france by dip mail, this is generally a fantastic level of meanness , the level of meanness goes off scale in all approaches of ukraine, that is, ukraine, oh, ukraine well, again, covered by the west, these are all the principles on which international humanitarian activity was built, and not frankly trampled. that is, if zelensky is here frankly here, but he tells. we say what our diplomacy does, he says, we barked. he says here these uh, international leaders, because putin is not will decide to shoot when it will, uh, international leaders, as if in kiev and therefore it will be in our immunity vasil, but after that you are surprised that he writes together international that and in this in the dpr they openly hide behind people. it's just that they're just behind them in uh, hiding in their houses in their apartments, and there are kindergartens, and hospitals, you really doubt it

it was the time when strange warsaw pacts existed.ent, when the economy was different and when our tanks were on the border of west germany and after a specific time they could reach the english channel, 7 + 5 days i’m completely embarrassed to say we now also have allies of the csto called me i will not evaluate. let's talk seriously. well, that's it, we have such a good thing, we have such a thing. he who stands on the border west germany stands. well, what are we talking about, he is generally in a different theater of operations and there are employees of belarus now, and there are theaters of military operations, in my opinion, the batteries are not separated. well, they are not physically there anyway. you can imagine europe's sanctions against us if you had our tanks in europe. you left there. why, therefore, there is a difference, rather in this. no. i'm not saying that time has changed in comparison with korean vietnamese history dmitry because it 's from me that the sanctions of the soviet union were imposed on quite serious

and what happened to the assurances given by the western partners after the dissolution of the warsaw pact now, even no one remembers putin uttered it in 2007 and it caused a rather violent reaction. place. august 8, 2008 saakashvili attacks the base of our peacekeepers there a couple. tank troops attack the peaceful cities of south ossetia in response, russia conducts a peace enforcement operation. it did not work in georgia, which means it is necessary to blow up russia from the inside. 2011 is an attempt by the bolotny maidan to restore those who are now waiting for our defeat. after the failure of the swamp, they decided to sway ukraine, frau knassel’s colleague, us secretary of state victoria nuland, on the maidan, nurtured a bloody coup d’état to power outright bandera, an aggressive and very dangerous anti-russia project receives official state status. ukraine declares the russian language illegal at the very first meeting of the verkhovna rada after the maidan, in response , crimea goes to russia to the southeast, crucians are sent and a civil war begins. it becomes an armed colony

nato warsaw pact secretary general to the last believed in the friendliness of the west and now it is perceived differently. he changed world politics this is a unique event when a person for 6 years. becoming a leader can change politics throughout the world, gorbachev believed to the last that perestroika had to be completed and that his life's work was alive and that new thinking and, in general , publicity, as he imagined it. all this was correct, and now they did not give him, therefore, to talk about some kind of evolution here. not necessary gorbachev announced non-interference in the affairs of the gdr and a year later did not become the berlin wall. he was applauded, foreign leaders said goodbye. today came only the ambassadors of the united states of britain germany france and the only foreign leader who was not afraid and came personally was the hungarian prime minister viktor orban, as gorbachev's comrades-in-arms say, with all his heart he wanted to build a new, more perfect soviet union, because in the old one he did not like much from here emergency economic reforms and