it was created when the warsaw pact treaty organization was created.you look at the panel, which is in the central part of the hall, then here, during the reconstruction, the emblem of the warsaw pact was preserved and the date is 1955, colonel general. anatoly sidorov went through afghanistan and chechnya. today he holds the position of chief of the joint staff at the dkb. this body is responsible for preparation of proposals on the force component of the organization, he coordinates the actions of the bodies of the utkb on issues of military cooperation. it includes representatives of the defense departments. all six member states of the collective security treaty organization, the formation, deployment , use of groups, troops, which are available in the organization. this is one of the main functions, the second function is also no less important. this, of course, is a comprehensive training of those formations that are part of the troops of the collective force. the first doctrine of of the collective rapid reaction forces of the csto took place in

their inclination, so to speak, and their support, but among those countries, it is not only the warsaw pact countries that were there, for example, canada, canada was one of the first to express its support, at the same time for the usa it was a surprise, what does this indicate well, canada , because at this point it advocated for the euro-atlantic integration of ukraine and for its accession to the ranks of nato. as for the united states , germany can also be mentioned here. pan-show this is until the 24th, on the eve of a full-scale invasion, allegedly this was information in the german er media convinced putin that ukraine would not even be er in nato for at least 20 years, so that is, we also recall the bucharest ones themselves, which is referred to, there is a link to the last communique of the signed memorandum e.e. at the last summit of the nobility in 2008, it was france and germany that then blocked the granting of state aid to us. that is, this is the reality, that is, the evolution of the opinion of the elites in europe, first of all in france , germany as the key countries of

, the very decision to dissolve the warsaw pact was announced in a joint statement by the leadership budapest on february 25, 1991. but what is characteristic is already in the spring of 1991, there were no official consultations yet. nato with poland , czechoslovakia, romania and bulgaria about the entry of these countries into the north atlantic military bloc, despite the numerous promises of the western powers that there would be no expansion of nato at the expense of the countries dissolved in the warsaw pact, the western media wrote the following entry into nato of former communist countries, especially hungary and czechoslovakia has been discussed among alliance members and is theoretically welcome, with washington being wary of joining ex-warsaw pact countries too quickly for fear of displeasing moscow. now there is no fear. here is my question. what jiri i noticed that you smiled when i said that the vote from me is ambiguous, and what caused this smile? well, i don't seem to be good at math . yes, but if 143 countries vote for and only five are against, but to put it mildly,

, the warsaw pact, we are destroying the world friendship, we believe everyone, finally, what happenedkets will cut planes with a rocket , cut the plane, what are we going to do at these factories? we will make crutches and pans at these factories. that's it, she smiled and backed in the back to the outgoing gorbachev, quietly, says to her soul we are waiting for him, we had it without a fire, and then further how much money was spent on bringing boris nikolayevich to power why, in order to destroy the country in belovezhskaya pushcha and immediately report this to whom president bush on december 8 1991, yeltsin's husband writes, called me to inform me of his meeting, if leonid kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich were actually presidents of ukraine and belarus. he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you learn about it from the press, 25 million of our compatriots turned out to be helpless outside our country, but confused and defenseless, and the

already in nato at the time or he had eastern europe we we don’t know, but how could they mean the warsaw pactn countries it was unthinkable, so and it ended up not to be told to say that we promise to forget and the heads of all the presidents and the prime minister that it will not be ridiculous. it was not included in this agreement, it was not yours and what was included was not included - it will be a pawn memorandum of the ninety- fourth year, when russia promised ukraine not to touch the borders of ukraine in exchange for obtaining a nuclear arsenal. that was the form the fourteenth year, while legally speaking, i would like to remind dear colleagues that, first of all, geography. yes, here the river elbe was mentioned when the elbe east lay in germany. for nato infrastructure and military weapons in the eastern part of germany, it was simply thrown into the trash. now history recall that when there was uh the situation with the korean war in the fifties early fifties with the vietnam war, the united states closely followed the containment of the soviet union containment socialist syste

known that the planes, and in disassembled form, were delivered to the countries of the former warsaw pactw it is these aircraft that are using the formation of the kiev regime. much more often, and the enemy uses unmanned aircraft, in in particular, and attack unmanned aerial vehicles are bayraktars, er, and, as a matter of fact, reconnaissance aircraft. eh, but here we are talking about complex types of a fairly large number, while the intensity of use, for example, turkish baractars. it is not so high, we can rather talk about the use of loitering ammunition. evgeny thank you very much, the situation in the krasnaya limansky direction was told by our war correspondent, and evgeny like the state duma adopted constitutional laws on the adoption of people's the republics of donbass and kherson zaporizhzhya regions into russia earlier today, the deputies unanimously ratified the relevant agreements with the session on the okhotny ryad followed, and our correspondent varvara nevskaya varvara again i welcome and the details of the voting, please, and very attentive listening alexander i welco

, the warsaw pact, we are breaking up the world friendship, we believe everyone, finally, what happenedut rockets planes cut plane, what are we going to do at these factories? we will make crutches and pans at these factories. that's it, she smiles at the back of the outgoing gorbachev, quietly, says to her soul, we are waiting for him, we had no fire, and then further how much money was spent on bringing boris nikolayevich yeltsin to power , for what, in order to destroy the belovezhskaya pushcha country and immediately report this to president bush on december 8, 1991, writes yeltsin's husband called me to inform me of his meeting, if with leonid kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich the president of ukraine and belarus actually. he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you know about this express, 25 million of our compatriots were outside our borders. countries helpless, but confused. shielded, but divorced continues and dies. the village is dying

after that, they look at the warsaw pact.ary and some kind of reason taken by the baltics, they look unequivocally, yes, like them, so it’s unpleasant for them, what happened and when they got free, after 10 years, they started to join. yes, look again. see double standards. barrel says all this history is already forgotten about it is not necessary. we need to build a new world, new collective security. yes, everyone forgot about it, but these do not forget. well, this is also history, there is no warsaw pact anymore. yes, the soviet union collapsed. what are you afraid of, you can ask or hear, and here you look and hear a very different answer from bulgaria, one answer from the baltics, another answer from hungary, we hear. yes of course, we are friends to the grave will kiss passionately. if you will be to us, although the hungarian president will be condemned on this list. what is it about, look. now i'm talking about something else, but if it falls apart, it must not fall apart, it will intensify. it is completely clear

on non-nuclear conventional forces. the warsaw pact had a colossal advantage.d to resort to its doctrine to use of tactical nuclear weapons. dmitry , the military potentials outside the nuclear sphere of russia and ukraine are simply not comparable in favor of russia today. we saw this potential, therefore, uh, well, it is quite obvious that russia has a colossal reserve, and military capabilities for uh, inflicting military damage to ukraine if such a task is set by non-nuclear means. it 's the first second when your position is uh, but uh, here's the thing. eh, first of all. eh, how are you? you know, no worse, it is not ukraine that opposes me to russia collective west. and this, of course, gives another dimension of the balance of power and the second. i absolutely agree with you that it is not constructive for russia to talk about any possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons, and i have not, not the slightest. e information that russia is a weapon, but is going to use it, but i hope you will agree with me that if you were in the pentagon and planned p

to russia knowing putin will not take it lightly, in addition, poland is a former member of the warsaw pactand if poland really gets nuclear weapons. it will become the first former warsaw pact country to make it a matter of whether the plan will be implemented. will the us agree to share nuclear weapons polish president duda in a recent interview suggested that the us is negotiating while including poland in a nuclear sharing program. you can you confirm or clarify this? oh good. so first, regarding your question. about poland i want to take a step back and point out that poland is an important nato ally in the region, but as far as this refers to this particular request, we don't know. i can say that the us has no plans to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of a nato member that joined nato after 1997. just to be clear, american nuclear weapons are deployed in nato countries in at least five of them in germany, the netherlands italy belgium and turkey so that these deployments are not without precedent. but poland is a completely different matter. this move will undoubtedly lead to a

it will be the first former warsaw pact country to make it a matter of whether the plan comes to fruitiongested in a recent interview that the us is negotiating to include poland in a nuclear sharing program. you can do it confirm or clarify as well. so first, regarding your question. about poland i want to take a step back and point out that poland is an important ally? in the region, but since it refers to this particular request, we do not know. whether this particular issue was raised, i can say that the us has no plans to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of a nato member that joined nato after 1997. just to be clear, american nuclear weapons are deployed in nato countries in at least five of them in germany netherlands italy belgium and turkey so that these deployments are not without precedent, but more this is a completely different matter. this move will undoubtedly lead to a major escalation if this proliferation of nuclear weapons continues, there will be repercussions that will effectively draw nato into the fighting. we all understand where this will lead to a nuclear w

happened to e -th sections again on a-a well, here is a neighbor like volodymyr talked about the warsaw pact nada but no result yes absolutely absolutely the world very clearly now understood that after february 24 after september 21 putin will not stop anywhere this country is not adequate, this leader is not adequate, that is, they will go because i think that the whole world and the countries of this western world, if we are talking about the united states of america, about great britain, and about the countries of the european union key countries, and they understand that the organization will definitely not be able to cope with its task, the osce is definitely not able to cope with its task, therefore, on the one hand, they are not ready to quickly defeat and divide russia, so we get a little bit of weapons, so we will get a little bit of all the help for that in order for certain processes to take place in russia, that is why the general wants to talk about the fact that we must be ready for them to take place in russia, and he expresses the position of the general military department

yes, we were unlucky, they gave everything away and the warsaw pact was given away and the countriesshed in our monuments. we remember that we must, in the end, we must understand that we have nowhere to retreat further and not just my words are what we need now support the president. they will tell me that sergei vasilievich was a presidential candidate . and it’s right to do that i went, because there should be an alternative everywhere, there should be this same one, well, the electorate between me and alexander grigorievich, anyway, i felt the same, because they wouldn’t say anything different nothing, but still in russia, dyuganov zhirinovsky is deceased and everyone else always went to the presidential elections. if you are the leader of the party, if you want to have a big party, you must to go to the presidential elections so that more people know about your position about what you think is the right people to judge the edits or wrong alexandrovich followed in your footsteps therefore. you know oleg sergeevich it 's very hard for me to say, this is my son. well, how to say it

and what happened to the assurances given by the western partners after the dissolution of the warsaw pact? where are these statements about them now, no one even remembers, but i let me remind this audience what was said. i would like to quote from the speech of mr. secretary general at nato in brussels on may 17, 1990. he then said the very fact that we are ready not to deploy nato troops outside the territory of the frg gives the soviet union firm guarantees of security. where can i guarantee you at the end of 2021 russia has already sent its proposals to the us and nato on legally binding security guarantees in europe however, in the responses of washington and brussels, moscow is of particular concern on this topic, again, according to tradition, it was ignored, it turns out that this is a partnership relationship. again. recall the munich speech. putin was voiced 15 years ago, there was time to think it over and avoid a lot of things that did not happen through no fault of ours. here comes the nuclear blackmail, it is not only about the shelling of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plan

countries is also limited due to this, the complexes were not distributed among countries of the warsaw pactrganization, therefore, we must first of all count on western aid in the short term, that is, the complexes that are being supplied now, well, they are more against aviation, and if there are more powerful american complexes, like that, ukraine will someday receive it . we will somehow solve the issue of combating ballistic targets, as long as we understand that this problem will persist , that is, if the issue there is to protect the ammunition of the same iranian ways, it will be solved the fight against cruise missiles, it is clear what to do and the means they are of one or another er with one or another effectiveness er, this issue will be resolved , the fight against ballistic missiles is now for us, well, let's say it can have a limited result and here only the russians come to our aid, and if we are talking about the operational-tactical level of these systems, the number is quite limited, a significant part was already used in the first seven months of the war, that is, if you

yes, here is the zone of influence of the soviet union, this is the warsaw pact, and there, in fact,ted as a policeman there, here are the curtains. and i fly from this side, there were sites where interests collided there were proxy wars in vietnam. well, even earlier, the korean war, and then afghanistan, the standard. and then the fairy tales. yes, yes. well, there they were fought . satisfies putin and to some extent china. when in fact the only policeman left was the united states and they used this function several times. another thing is that they relied on an international coalition. this was right when they solved problems behind cancer, but now putin, you know, he constantly refers to the united states as an example, saying that someone can, yes, yes, he wants the 15th year, all this rhetoric is absolute, he wants to claim the role of a world or at least a regional policeman, but he acts contrary to international law, contrary to legislation, in fact, he breaks the system that, well, let's just say, is not very effective, it is already outdated in many of its elements, but

whole space that used to make up the soviet union, and even the space that used to make up the warsaw pactember states, latvia, lithuania, and substantial influence in six or seven nato states. he wants to destroy nato, and it's a vital interest of ours to protect our nato allies. so we need to stop tuten in ukraine, simply with american money in american weapons. if biden and his team explain this clearly to the american people as ijust did, i have no doubt that there is very strong support that would continue as long as it takes. really good to get your analysis. thank you very much. my analysis. thank you very much. my pleasure. analysis. thank you very much. my pleasure-— my pleasure. former united states investor _ my pleasure. former united states investor to _ my pleasure. former united states investor to ukraine. | in moscow president putin has been celebrating his 70th birthday. the head of russia's orthodox church told the nation mr putin's rule was "mandated by god," praising him for "transforming russia's image" and defending "its national interests". but on russian television,

officers there, where are you going anywhere in the field to a clean military contingent , the warsaw pact bloc destroying the world friendship, we believe everyone, finally, what happened rockets cut rockets planes cut the plane, what are we going to do at these factories? we will make crutches and pans at these factories. that's it, she smiles at the back of the outgoing gorbachev, quietly, says to wash his soul, we are waiting for we had a fire, and then further how much money was spent on bringing boris nikolayevich yeltsin to power for what in order to destroy the country in belovezhskaya pushcha and immediately report this to president bush on december 8, 1991, god yeltsin writes called me to inform me about his meeting, if leonid kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich are actually president of ukraine and belarus. he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you learn about it from the press, 25 million of our compatriots found themselves outside our c

officers, where yes, nowhere in the field to a clean military contingent, we are taking away the warsaw pactrsaw bloc, we are breaking up peace friendship, we believe everyone, finally, what happened rockets cut rockets planes cut plane, what are we going to do at these factories? we will make crutches and pans at these factories. everything, she smiles at the back of the departing gorbachev, quietly, says to her soul, we did it. we had it without fire and then on. how much money was spent to ensure that boris nikolayevich came to power for what in order to belovezhskaya pushcha to ruin the country and immediately report it to whom? president bush december 8, 1991 writes bush yeltsin called me to announce his meeting with leonid kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich, the president of ukraine and belarus in fact. he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you learn about it from the press of 25 million of our compatriots turned out to be helpless outside our

what happened, for example, in the fifty-fifth year, when uh was not yet created created by the warsaw pact, when nato in the church, or rather the americans, conducted exercises using the use of nuclear weapons, as a result of which the territory of germany was destroyed, e, virtual, of course, within 10 minutes, which drove the europeans crazy or remember the nuclear exercises of the eighty-third year, and which nato conducted e, as a result of which the armed forces of the soviet union were strategic missile forces alert number one was carried out and it was not canceled until the end of the exercise, because it was assumed that it could not be ruled out that such exercises were a disguise for the preparation of a nuclear attack . strike, but the current situation these routine exercises. uh. i strongly believe it is closely monitored and uh, the russian leadership can always take corrective action. if you need it here, if you continue. regarding the aggressive behavior of the states yes, in particular, the news agency quotes you the united states and nato countries put european security

where are you going nowhere in the field to a clean military contingent, we are taking away the warsaw pactce friendship, we believe everyone, finally, what happened rockets cut rockets planes cut plane, what are we going to do in these factories? we will make crutches and pans at these factories. that's it, she smiles at the back of the outgoing gorbachev, quietly, says to her soul, we are waiting for him, we had this demon fire, and then further how much money was spent on bringing boris nikolayevich to power, for what, in order to let the country fall apart even more here report this to whom president bush writes on december 8, 1991 bush yeltsin called me to inform him of his meeting, if leonid kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich are actually presidents of ukraine and belarus . he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you know it from the press, 25 million of our compatriots found themselves outside our country helpless, but confused and defenseless,

they signed a statement that they are in favor of, but it is primarily the countries of the former warsaw pacthat see themselves as a threat to their country that they can be next, so to speak, and understand that this is ukraine - this is still the case, that is, it is necessary with such a future e- e army, she will protect them and is very useful to her daughter, but there is france.”

yes, we were unlucky, they gave everything away and the warsaw pact was given away and the countriesnow being demolished in our monuments. we remember that we must, in the end, we must understand that we have nowhere to retreat further and it’s not just my words that we need to support the president now. they will tell me sergey vasilievich of presidential candidates went and went. and he did the right thing, that he went, because it should be everywhere, the alternative should be this very one, well, alexander and i have an electorate grigorievich, anyway, i felt the same, because they wouldn’t say anything different. nothing, but anyway, in russia, dzyuganov zhirinovsky, the deceased, and everyone else always went to the presidential elections. if you are the leader of the party, if you want to have a big party, you should go to the presidential elections, so that more people know about your position about what you think is right for people to judge edits or wrong for sergeyevich to follow in your footsteps therefore. you know oleg sergeevich it's very hard for me to say, this is m

if earlier, after the collapse of the soviet union, the warsaw pact , there was one hegemon who believedd national interests everywhere, he told how to live, according to what rules the hegemon should say goodbye to his status. of course, they are very reluctant to try to say goodbye to this status. to do this, they are trying to destroy europe, to belittle the status or to deplete the russian federation, to remove it from the arena. china and so on. they use a lot of targets here , which i would like to add in the coming weeks, france will strengthen its military presence on the eastern flank of nato by deploying additional personnel and armored vehicles to romania, naruto will be sent reinforced with infantry fighting vehicles, and also units of eclerk tanks, rafael fighters will be sent to lithuania and a company of light infantry will arrive in estonia and really about strengthening the eastern flank of nato and a joint response. republics of belarus and the russian federation in more detail in our story, nato forces are drawn to the east . massive movements of us military and specia

it used to have a warsaw pact on side. but since the dissolution, the soviet union is literally been russia against nato. and since i would say the 2008 time period, russian has been preparing for the eventuality of large scale combat against data. which means they have built an arsenal of capable of sustaining that com, a conflict. russia has more than enough missiles, more enough ammunition, more than enough weapons, more enough logistics to sustain. not only the current conflict with ukraine, but whatever might take place in the future with natal. i don't seem to find russia running out of ammunition any time, so it's like, it's like, it was like, i'm a parent who said even a couple of months ago, a few months ago, he said we haven't started anything in earnest yet. so maybe that does kind of stuff tell with what you're saying, that's got current to you every time russia, every time russia attacks key as president zalinski is typically 1st tons to foreign leaders before even addressing his own nation. why, why do you th

officers there, where yes, nowhere in the field in a clean military contingent, we are taking away the warsaw pact, the warsaw bloc we are breaking up peace friendship we all believe, finally, what happened rockets cut rockets planes cut the plane, what will do in these factories? on these factories will make crutches and pans. that's it, she smiles at the back of the outgoing gorbachev, quietly, says to her soul we are waiting for him, we had it without fire, and then further how much money was spent to ensure that boris nikolaevich came to power for vo in order to destroy the country in belovezhskaya pushcha and then but report this to president bush on december 8, 1991, writes bush, yeltsin called me to tell me about his meeting with leonid kravchuk and stanislav shushkevich, the president of ukraine and belarus, in fact. he was still together with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today, yeltsin said , a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you know it from the press, 25 million of our compatriots found themselves outside ou

if earlier, after the collapse of the soviet union, the warsaw pact, there was one hegemon who believed that she had national interests everywhere, he told everyone how to live, according to what rules the hegemon should say goodbye to his status. of course, they are very reluctant to try to say goodbye to this status. to do this, they are trying to destroy europe, to belittle the status or to deplete the russian federation, to remove it from the arena. china and so on. they use a lot of purposes here , which i would like to add to in the coming weeks, france will strengthen its military presence on the eastern flank of nato by deploying, additional personnel and armored vehicles will be sent to romania a company reinforced with infantry fighting vehicles, as well as eclair tank units, rafael fighters will be sent to lithuania and a light infantry company will arrive in estonia and indeed on the strengthening of the eastern flank of nato and joint response rea. republics of belarus and the russian federation in more detail in our story nato forces are drawn to the east massive movements

nuclear weapons are everything a threat to russia the ussr is no more no more of the warsaw pact.e of nato in principle. there should be no ussr and nato jeffrey swears that the americans are sane americans are well aware of what is really happening in the donbass , many in the states, for example, cia director william burns confirmed that molda we understand everything, but it should not be placed on the territory of ukraine by the americans themselves. we agreed with this. even the director of the cia in the united states knew that there was this line that should not be crossed, but they crossed anyway. why because now they earn on the production of weapons. many government officials in the united states have gifts to arms companies. and now they are earning a lot of money, they do not care about the people of ukraine, the people of russia and not chasing their own benefits, this is the main problem. russia is trying to protect its borders. don't let it come. the emergence of bases of alliances in neighboring countries and trying to protect the people of donbass jeffrey monson i

yes, we were unlucky, they gave everything away and the warsaw pact was given away and the countriesn the end, we must understand that we have nowhere to retreat further and it’s not just my words that we need to support the president now. they will tell me sergey vasilievich of presidential candidates went and went. and he did the right thing, that he walked, because that there should be everywhere, there should be this same alternative, well, the electorate between me and alexander grigorievich, anyway, i felt the same, because they wouldn’t say anything different. nothing, but anyway, in russia, dyuganov, the late zhirinovsky and everyone else always went to the presidential elections . if you're a party leader, if you want to have a big party, you should go to the presidential election so that more people know about your position about what you think is right for people to judge edits or wrong sergeevich followed in your footsteps, therefore. you know oleg sergeevich it's very hard for me to say, this is my son. well, how to say it in such a way that it doesn’t work out praise of

in krasnodar in the belarusian military district armed forces there were over 245,000 plus the warsaw pactre. some were belarusians, they stayed. here, plus , those who had 15 years of service were allowed to retire, and we, of course, had serious evolutionary resources. hmm, plus, we have not given up on really urgent military service, and our state, it cannot refuse it, because we have mixed, in principle, recruitment, precisely because we must prepare evolutionary resources for this, especially in scarce specialties. and if we can't to prepare during the period of service in the armed forces, yes, then we should do this at separate training camps for the training of specialties in short supply and the armed forces are conducting all these schedules, how much is lacking, how much there is a surplus and everything else . and we, therefore, the armed forces are working clearly. do i understand correctly. mibilization readiness implies, among other things, the availability of appropriate equipment and weapons, which, if necessary, will be needed during mobilization. and this is, respectivel

the armed forces were there more than 245,000 plus the warsaw pact.re belarusians, stayed here, plus they were allowed to quit, who had 15 years of service, and we, of course, had a serious evolutionary resource. hmm, plus we didn’t give up on a really urgent military services and our state, it cannot refuse this, because we have mixed, in principle, staffing, precisely because we must prepare evolutionary resources for this, especially in scarce specialties. and if we cannot prepare them during the period of service in the armed forces, yes, then we must do this at separate training camps for the training of scarce specialties and the armed forces are conducting all these schedules, how much is not enough, how much is surplus and everything else and we, therefore, are armed strength clear work, do i understand correctly that mobilization readiness implies, among other things, the availability of appropriate equipment and weapons, which, if necessary, will be needed during mobilization. and this is, respectively, storage verification. yes, and the mov

krasnodar, in the belarusian military district, the armed forces were there more than 245,000 plus the warsaw pact there. some were belarusians, they stayed. here, plus , they were allowed to leave those who had a length of service of 15 years, and we, of course, had a serious evolutionary resource. hmm, plus we did not refuse really urgent military service, and our state, it cannot refuse it, because we have mixed recruiting principles, namely, because we must prepare these evolutionary resources, especially in scarce specialties. and if we can not train them while serving in the armed forces, yes, then we must do this at separate training camps scarce specialties and the armed forces are being conducted all these schedules were how much is missing, how much is in excess and everything else . and we, therefore, the armed forces are working clearly, do i understand correctly. automobilization readiness implies , among other things, the availability of appropriate equipment and weapons, which, if necessary, will be needed during mobilization. and this is, respectively, storage verification. yes, an

then there were the gdr czechoslovakia poland, finally the collapse of the soviet union and the warsaw pactorbachev, the arrival of nato in the baltic states and ukraine and as a result , everything that we are experiencing today we will not simplify situation, both before and after nikita khrushchev, fatal mistakes were made, at least no less, and yet the crimean bandera people. and nato is what hurts all of us here and now. so thank you dear nikita sergeevich for everything. the conclusion is one story that few people know, as you know, a month and a half after the death of his father, vasily stalin was arrested, they charged him with debauchery and drunkenness, they slapped him for 8 years in the camps, but they kept him in prison in the vladimir central, where, as you know, a year goes for three, they finished off, knowing the problems with health. vasya quickly broke down and began to write tearful letters to khrushchev, when he became completely ill after listening. having reported to the chief, the kgb shelepin, they say there will be a scandal if stalin’s son lies in prison, khrushc

it comes to the nato question and whether nato should pack up its bags and go home because the warsaw pacthad dissolved or should it expand slowly and selectively, or basically, put the pedal to the metal. that's what happened in 08 with george bush in the bucharest conference, i would follow after that. all of those questions, they weren't decided in 99. before the collapse of the soviet union. but that was a key moment in this, the so-called not one inch promise. that is playing a part in today's drama, because putin does say the west promised they would not expand nato one inch passed its current border. well, that was just a discussion, it was a conversation between james baker and soviet officials. i think, actually, it was gorbachev himself. we know that president george h. w. bush and his cabinet ultimately decided that not only would a unified germany remain part of nato, but that nato would have the freedom to potentially expand in the future. what are your thoughts on that chapter? because as i said, it's looming large now, the so-called not one inch. >> the open door policy of n

soviet weapons that were in ukraine have been destroyed it means that the weapons that were in the warsaw pactdestroyed. yes, now ukraine is based solely on the supply of purely western weapons, and it is no coincidence that steinmeier, who yesterday was, uh, in ukraine, he ended his stay there with a statement, about which let's hear. i promised president zelensky today that in the coming days, ukraine will receive two mars systems, as well as four of our panzer house 2000 howitzers. corridors of power in europe and ukraine, and the new american western practice of supporting ukraine in romania was transferred by the american. ah, division. airborne, which conduct exercises near the border of ukraine and, uh, observational, uh, experts drew attention to the fact that u actually coloring. the weapons that are used in these exercises, e, correspond to the coloring of the ukrainian armed forces , that is, most likely this is the same western weapons that are intended for the ukrainian armed forces and exercises, most likely not romanians and not americans take part, but including the ukrainian a

nato's represent most of the western democracies, and then the warsaw pact, headed by the soviet union along with its satellites in eastern europe, facing off against the cold war had, expanded throughout the 1950s around the world particularly asia. and when china became communist in 1949, that was seen as grave blow to the west that same year when the soviet union detonated its first atomic device that also a grave blow because the west no longer had a monopoly on atomic weapons. and during the course of the 1950s, both sides set out to try to their power territory territorially as well as as militarily. by the late 1950s, there was a real concern about missiles and is particularly true after launch of sputnik in october 1957, which that the soviets had this ballistic capability, a a missile could circle the globe, could land on the united states and the us didn't have that. and so beginning in october 1957, although it started before that, there was a real push on to try to enhance the west's nato's capabilities to counter that soviet offensive threat. and so deals are struck with a

nato's represent most of the western democracies, and then the warsaw pact, headed by the soviet union along with its satellites in eastern europe, facing off against the cold war had, expanded throughout the 1950s around the world particularly asia. and when china became communist in 1949, that was seen as grave blow to the west that same year when the soviet union detonated its first atomic device that also a grave blow because the west no longer had a monopoly on atomic weapons. and during the course of the 1950s, both sides set out to try to their power territory territorially as well as as militarily. by the late 1950s, there was a real concern about missiles and is particularly true after launch of sputnik in october 1957, which that the soviets had this ballistic capability, a a missile could circle the globe, could land on the united states and the us didn't have that. and so beginning in october 1957, although it started before that, there was a real push on to try to enhance the west's nato's capabilities to counter that soviet offensive threat. and so deals are struck with a