but we didn't really carefully read the washington treaty and the fifth article of the washington treatysays that the main philosophy of the alliance is the security of the alliance territory and everything else is not of interest to them, that is, they can indirectly take some actions, as they say outside, but only to the extent that it firstly, it does not put them in danger and secondly , to the extent that it contributes to their own security. that is, this is a slightly exaggerated expectation, the same organization of the united nations is a universal international organization that was created after the second world war only as a platform for discussing problematic moments of international relations and international security, there has never been such a world global policeman , no un peacekeeping mission actually led to the cessation of the conflict as such, and the blue helmets never gave such a practical result, so again we must evaluate the reaction of international actors according to, well, as it were, taking into account their authority, taking into account the ideas that a

after that i i want to remind you that this is the time of the second world war, this is the washington treaty, the washington declaration, and in fact, in the design of the states against the anti-hitler axis, when they gathered and decided to decide what was needed to fight hitler, and the second decision about what will be adopted is the declaration of the united nations, which is supposed to be, well, in fact, for the future , it laid the foundations for something like that. as an anti-russian or anti-putin coalition in this case, other formats are possible, but there must be two things, firstly , that the restoration of peace in europe , at least, and that in the world, is impossible without victory over russia today, and the second is what should happen is at least the reform of the un, and as a maximum the re-establishment of this organization is, at the end of the war, this is always a reason to change these paradigms, because similar decisions have always been made based on the results of wars and resolutions , so i think that here too, we should not delay, because in a different way

re-establishment of we have the opportunity for this, i have spoken about it repeatedly er, the washington treaty declaration and the actual registration of the states against the anti-hitler axis when they gathered and decided and decided that it was necessary to fight hitler, and the second decision, which is about what will be adopted, is the declaration of the united nations, which is probably, well, in fact, for the future laid the foundations for u- here is something like that. i think it would be useful for us to conduct it, maybe it could be the rammstein format, which is framed as an anti-russian or anti-putin coalition, in this case, other formats are possible, but there should be two things, first of all, about that the restoration of peace in europe at least and that in the world is impossible without victory over russia today and the second is what should happen at least the reform of the un and at the most the re-establishment of this organization is at the end of the war this is always a reason for change here of these paradigms because similar decisions have always been made based

the appropriate conclusions. there will not be such a virtual situation that article 5 of the washington treatyay be involved in an attack on one and an attack on us, but all the resources that are considered possible and expedient at this time on the part of our western and other allies who can be provided in ukraine, they will be provided because i will give you the opinion that so much has already been invested today. in itself, it seems to me to be a very powerful political mutual, what will the world look like after the defeat of russia, this is a question that, unfortunately, there is no answer today. and this is exactly what i think explains a certain such uh, well , from our point of view, political correctness in the statements of the leaders of our leading allies is superfluous finally, i want to touch on the topic of viktor orbán , the prime minister of hungary for three minutes, who once again made several very provocative statements, even saying that ukraine does not have sovereignty because it is governed by a whole bunch of people, and again there is a set of things that ukraine

threats are is gradually forming on the part of russia, now with regard to article five of the washington treaty like to remind you that the wording of this article was in 1949 and then. actually , the text of this article is about the use of the mechanism of collective defense in the event of an armed attack on one of the countries. that is, it is only about an armed attack. but recently there have been discussions about the fact that today the conditions have changed so much that this article does not fully cover the risks that are for, first of all, for the population of nato countries for the territory of nato countries for critical infrastructure, well, for example, this is what concerns e.e. tiberg threats, that is, e.e., until today, with such well-known cyberattacks that were e.e., there were no cases of this leading to mass casualties among the civilian population, but there is an understanding that let's put it figuratively, the power of those tibers was significantly less than the capabilities of the aggressor country, that's why i'm saying that the discussion about non-kinetic or una

that ukraine also has the perspective of membership in nato, we support the 10th article of the washington treatypen doors and i think that this issue will also be raised at the nato summit in vilnius on july 11 and 12 this year, at the beginning of the war, the ukrainians were poorly armed but now we are in a situation where ukraine is starting a counteroffensive russia controls less than 20% of the country he thinks there are three factors one of them is of course the most important how ukrainian forces fight they are extremely inspiring he believes that this is actually a decisive factor for success the second factor is the stability of the ukrainian population the third factor and also very important is the unity of the eu and nato have never cooperated so closely as during the war in ukraine, everything naturally led to the ability to provide military aid and support ukraine on such a scale that we have not seen before, at least we have not seen this in sweden, i think it is quite unique, but i also want to say that we have rational expectations for the ukrainians and their counteroffensive,

i understand correctly that in the washington treaty itself in the nato documents there are no requirementsr. haven't come up with anything else. that is, we can become the 33rd member of nato after sweden, well, now they want to make some plans for several years of ukraine's preparation, they are still free to offer something, well, it should not be any additional tool, that is, it can be some kind of set well, that is, under certain conditions , especially domestic ones, the legislation may need to be changed in ukraine in the security and defense sector in order to fully respond, i admit, but to turn it into a new national program when we already have the anniversaries of the national program. we have all mechanisms i think that this would be wrong and now the key question is that it is good that according to the simplified procedure, although it still sounds like separate countries, eh, i think that this will be presented as a result. there must be a political invitation and it must be as soon as possible and then all the procedures and these procedures will take quite a long time becau

organization will be strong with strong positions , more than the fifth article even of the washington treatynk it will be a solution, because in terms of population, then these countries will be compared with russia , the nuclear potential will be somewhat smaller, because it is just not, but everything is equal in the production of medium and shorter-range missiles, we can seriously balance these capabilities, the only problem is that it splits nato and ukraine does not want to do that at this stage , if it goes as it is now, we will not have a second choice - after all, for today it is to convince our partners that it is cheaper that is, to talk to their voters, taxpayers, that the common security model is cheaper and more realistic for the future . well, the third is an argument that every politician in european countries and in america and canada understands. of the army, as ukraine put up defense forces and more motivated, ready to go into battle, professionals , women, men, ready to die for their country, and obviously, in this way, protecting others , that is, that is why they do not

nuclear power , in principle we cannot satisfy any guarantees outside of the fifth article of the washington treaty. and actually, this is the problem there would be no nuclear weapons in the russian federation. ukraine was already a member of nato, but if we were a member of nato, russia would not be able to pursue an aggressive policy and continue the war, this is also true because of course nuclear deterrence exists and works and actually it is not effective, we see that there is less of this rhetoric now from the kremlin , they periodically, of course, there are exacerbations related to the phases, they are contained. here, but they are the minority who say this now because they have seen the readiness of the western partners. well, i am not talking about the protection of their allies in europe, even in the event of any actions on the territory of ukraine, they have already repeatedly warned that such a blow will be delivered by non-nuclear means that will be equal in destructive power to the use of tactical nuclear weapons. so i wish i was wrong. but honestly i see that france, germany and pr

i understand correctly that in the washington treaty itself , there are no requirements in nato documentsere are different options, and right now it would be good if they didn’t come up with something else. that is, we can become the 33rd nato member country after sweden, well, now they want to make some plans for several years of ukraine’s preparation, something is free after all to offer, well, it should not be any additional tool. that is, it can be some kind of conditioning. well, that is, certain conditions , especially internal ones, the legislation may need to be changed in ukraine in the security and defense sector in order to be fully responsive, i admit, but to turn it into a new pdc when we already have an annual national program we have all the mechanisms i think it would be wrong and now the key question it is good that according to the simplified procedure although it still sounds like separate countries eh i think this will be presented as a result that's right there, but you have to understand one key basic thing that first there should be a political invitation and it sho

er, past the er, and actually approach the membership itself, i understand correctly in the washington treaty itself, there are no requirements in the nato documents. how should it be, there are different options, and now, yes , it would be good if they did not come up with something else. that is, we can become the 33rd nato member country after sweden, but now they want some plans to make on a few years of ukraine's preparation are still free to offer something , well, it shouldn't be any additional tool . that is, it can be some kind of conditioning set. well, that is, certain conditions, especially internal ones, the legislation may need to be changed in ukraine in the security and defense sector in order to i am allowed to answer completely, but to turn it into a new national program when we already have an annual national program. we have all the mechanisms. i think that it would be wrong and now the key question is that it is good that according to the simplified procedure, although this so far, it sounds like separate countries, eh. i think that this will be presented as a result. tha

believe that it corresponds to a certain extent to what is also stated in the fifth article of the washington treatyato that in in case of an attack on a country, there is an armed attack, the rest of the countries help it, there is no binding function , for example, each one gives how many tanks, sends planes or immediately dispatches naval ships there, but this is an article of the general plan and it there is, so to speak, some kind of more detailed deciphering and, in this sense, to expect that the european union will provide the same assistance as nato members provide to their colleagues, there is no reason, but it is about something else that the european union has enough civil-military mechanisms and now we see that some of them are involved for the first time for ukraine precisely in connection with the war, well, even such a simple mechanism as helping ukrainian refugees and keeping them on the territory of the country of the european union, this is already the second year and there will be a third, too is directly related to the war, er, the second point is the joint production of weapons.

federation, which is the largest nuclear power, no guarantees other than the fifth article of the washington treatyin principle, satisfy us.

to explain why this cannot happen during the war, because there is the fifth article of the washington treatystipulates that nato member countries can count on collective protection. ukraine has already said that it will not initiate the application of this article. as for itself , but then nato appears in the role of a geopolitical invalid, you understand, so it turns out that for some it can apply this article and for others it cannot and this blow is primarily a reshuffle of the alliance. but i think that after the end of the russian-ukrainian war, since the composition of nato and the european union are 85.90 percent the same, then the restoration of ukraine and the economic restoration will come to the fore, here we will see competition from the european union from the side of the united states, perhaps china will want to say something specific if it has the opportunity to do so, and it will also be more important. the president told chisinau that he wants to talk to russia from a position of strength with position of strength of course we can talk about the fact that we are joining nato

this is clearly the washington treaty. task in another task - it's fighting with us and rocking. what i want to emphasize the rocking of the situation. we can't break through inside. there is one more gap, there in the defense. it is there tactical tasks that cannot be obtained unequivocally now and the task will not succeed in making a breach inside. and here i am very carefully. yesterday was russia day. well, in the country and most importantly in our new regions. and listened very carefully very well passed it was a very serious impulse. and this is my first time. they listened very carefully. these young guys who talked with our president are wounded guys. well, recovering guys who are undergoing treatment. i just looked at me listened, i had the opportunity. there, on my modest level, i also have to communicate with people. here are the fighters who were wounded there, so to speak, someone, so to speak, is going there again. yes, everyone is absolutely ready to want to return and continue to work and fight for russia, for our security. here is the spirit. this indicates, wh

to a non-nuclear country, which is considered against the non-proliferation units of the washington defense treaty and canberra's mutilation of australia into a nuclear submarine that aims to inform against china has signed the success of domestic experts in producing new resistant cultivars of barley and wheat in accordance with the educational network. officials of the isfahan agricultural research center say that with the production of this variety, the productivity of the type of wheat suitable for pasta production has increased to seven tons per hectare. it is functional but in good condition in the path of agricultural prosperity , 14 years of research work has been carried out until a promising line in the hands of one of the farms of isfahan agricultural research stations.

the nato political and military response mechanism provided for in the fifth article of the washington treaty move is an obvious attempt escalation of the ukrainian crisis to an unprecedented level with unforeseen consequences. vitaly katchenko, da ilyas ridzhetdinova elena shtokolova and sergey nashchekin channel one. a provocation with a nuclear threat is not the only one in the cynical plans of kiev , the ukrainian regime is trying to compensate for its failures with new attempts to counterattack, which the west demands. and this requires false conclusions. the same provocations one of these on the left bank of the dnieper near the antonovsky bridge ukrainian militants for several days. there dug in trying to gain a foothold demonstrated the possibility of a larger landing. and today, ours were hit by high-precision missiles and the iskander tactical complex on the shots of the most powerful, an explosion, as a result of which only at least 30 militants were destroyed. after that, the cleansing began. troops successfully repelled five enemy attacks per day, up to 160 ukrainian servicemen w

technology to a non-nuclear country, which is considered a violation of the non-proliferation treaty of the washington, london and canberra defense treaty for armed forces. kurdish nuclear submarine that was signed with the aim of the coalition against china, the statistics of audio and video calls of yes messenger reached 700,000 calls per day with an increase of about 40% this week, the deputy ceo of yes has announced on the editor's social network, the polls of this message conveyor it helps to increase the quality of viewing. according to mr. tajamlian, 47 thousand users participated in the surveys of the last 24 hours, and 77% of them gave excellent and very good ratings to these voice and video calls, the possibility of individual insurance for pregnant mothers and breastfeeding provided 3 the board of directors of the health insurance organization says that this insurance coverage includes mothers up to two years after the birth of babies. in the field of infertility and childbirth it covers about 60 types of drugs related to infertility, about 56 tests, 56 tests, and eight types of imaging and

in this case, will article 5 of the washington treaty be effective against whom?to a stupor. we remember the president of lithuania who likes to take selfies on a tank. and now he didn’t give a selfie to the tanks. he gives orders to strengthen the border, the same thing is being done today by warsaw. therefore, in the days themselves in vilnius , it is obvious that all available combat most prepared units of lithuania and poland will be advanced to the border with belarus in order to insure, as it were, what did not work out lessons to be done. they certainly are. from this whole situation, the work will be done, respectively, by the analytical groups and the federal security service and the fsb in the security council apparatus. therefore, i think that with any options, the solution that will be found will be the most optimal from the point of view of preventing such situations for russia from now on. conclusions that such a situation will no longer be allowed. what conclusions should be drawn for all loyal ones to tame all non-loyal ones send in belarus there i

believe that the theft of oil fields by the american invaders is a clear crime and shows washington's disregard for treaties and international laws. almost every day, americans remove 10 tankers carrying stolen syrian oil from the legal crossings, which is a sign of their disregard for charters and international agreements . clients the imam khomeini relief and welfare committee has started, the first phase of the beneficiaries of the imam khomeini relief committee and the welfare organization, if 70% of the 320,000 tomans royan subsidy credits are purchased today in the form of electronic merchandise, the amount of 80,000 tomans will be added to their additional subsidy credits on the way. the basic product includes a low-cost product plan in the following order: there is milk, cheese, yogurt, meat , veal, chicken , eggs, pasta, oil, sugar, and beans. show electronically that some according to the figures of the electronic commodity plan, with one of the new loans of the electronic commodity plan for the beneficiaries of the imam khomeini relief committee and welfare organization, the beneficiaries of the

the theft of oil fields by the american invaders is a clear crime and shows washington's disregard for treaties and international laws. 10 tankers carrying stolen syrian oil are taken out of illegal crossings, which is a sign of the disregard of charters and international agreements . and he himself was martyred to recite a fatiha, but latifah said in a speech at the arab parliament meeting that by declaring support for the palestinian nation , i ask the members of the parliament to rise for the happiness of the souls of the martyrs of the arabic and islamic texts who were martyred in the way of supporting palestine , the martyr muhammad salah and reading surah fatiha recently, news sources announced the holding of massive demonstrations in tel aviv and other areas of the occupied territories. these demonstrations are against the prime minister of the zionist regime and the policies of his cabinet. according to the al-mayadeen network and the media of the zionist regime , they estimated the number of zionist protesters to be around 200,000. they appeared in the streets for the 23rd week in a ro

sovereignty of the government and the law, we condemn it from the oil fields and it shows washington's disregard for treaties and international laws, and american sanctions almost every day remove 10 tankers carrying stolen syrian oil from illegal crossings as a sign of their disregard for charters and international agreements, we will face fraud in the upcoming american elections. the former president of the united states said on saturday evening in a gathering of his supporters in the state of georgia that considering the fact that the american democrats imprison their opponents, they are communists. referring to the current position of the united states, donald trump said that the history of the united states has never seen a more corrupt president than biden. trump, in his first speech after indicting 37 charges related to keeping confidential documents of the white house in his personal home, said that when a member of congress or vice president he used to keep confidential documents in his private house and nothing happened because of this , and he also said that the danger of internal enemies is great

period while it is not in nato, it will receive a security guarantee similar to article 5 of washington of this treatyly, it is unlikely to happen in vilnius, in particular, because of the position of the crown presidents and chancellor shultz, ah-ah, how do i see it today, despite the fact that i think that western leaders are definitely more at least now understanding what russia is, who is who putin, but they still don't have it enough courage to accept no. no matter how true it is, western leaders do not take into account how much it will cost ukraine , how many lives will be lost , how many houses will be destroyed, how many cities will be destroyed, how many more environmental leagues will be , and so on. and how many and how much will it cost western taxpayers? because aid to ukraine is worth money and the west will continue it, but if you don't give ukraine what it should give from my point of view, then this aid will be worth it i would also like to float more and more to another topic , actually the president, ex-president trump . that country where they don't look at the positions and actua

the first is in itself article five of the washington treaty.omatic military assistance. it says that an attack on one is an attack on all, so everyone will help according to their er, capabilities. yes. it is not written anywhere that we will declare war by aggression ; it is not even written anywhere to break off diplomatic relations to warm up, especially since it is not written anywhere that we will announce a general mobilization. even this is not the case once in its history, nato enacted the fifth article of the token treaty. it was september 12 2001 in response to 9/11. well, and that someone declared martial law, someone introduced mobilization, someone introduced a state, but then they recognized the group as an enemy, they are the state, they explain to you like this, in fact, they partially recognized it, but no one was military did not include provisions. this is a very important point. this procedure is not spelled out in the contract. a pay attention to an interesting paradox it would seem that there is nato there is a north atlan

alas, let's, let's, as they say everything on the merits, the fifth article of the washington treaty.introduced it at least once in their life, only one state of the united states of america. let at least 100 of these thousands of these troops enter here anyway, this article will not be put into operation. everyone understands this, the americans created this fifth paragraph in order to there is another to mobilize everything, they mobilize all the fuck of their own. wait for the second well, which means that the fifth article is introduced when it is against this state on its territory. in general , he’s not talking about the fifth article, but such regular troops under the guise of mercenaries and interpretations. they already found a grave here. the only thing? look here regularity the same thing will happen and wait. go. wait, please, one small nuance. you know, when this issue was raised more than once in poland and they clearly said, that in this case it will not be a conflict with russia, but a conflict between poland and russia it is clear all of us now we just say so, well, i

the skin of the defense treaty between washington, london and the united arab emirates is equal to australia's nuclear submarine, which was signed with the aim of informing against china . the media and experts of the zionist regime , referring to the unveiling of the fatah missile, stated that the advanced capabilities of the iranians should not be underestimated. in a report, al-mayadeen network investigated some points of view. at the same time as the threats of high-ranking israeli officials against iran increased and the military exercise of this regime was held under the name of "tehran's punching fist ", the minister of war of israel quickly unveiled its first ultrasonic missile called fatah. reacted to this missile and said that israel is an effective response to the threats of the enemies while the level of threats between israel and iran has increased, iran unexpectedly unveiled another factor that is worrying, this factor is an advanced ultrasonic missile that it produces it is iran and so far we have not seen anything like it in iran, this is a problem that should be worrying for i

non-nuclear country, which is considered to be against the non-proliferation treaty, the defense treaty of washington, london and the united arab emirates to arm australia with a nuclear submarine, which was signed with the aim of informing against china, the media and observers in the zionist regime, iran's unveiling of missiles fattah's supersonic missile is seen as iran's strong message against any threat. al-akhbar newspaper, published in london, wrote in a report that by unveiling fattah's supersonic missile , iran sent a message to the west that the ash missile program is a non-negotiable issue. this is an army exercise the tehran regime unveiled its first hypersonic missile called fatah, the minister of war of israel reacted quickly to the unveiling of this missile and said that israel is an effective response to the threats of the enemies while the level of threats between israel and iran has increased. unexpectedly, he unveiled another factor that is worrying. this factor is an advanced ultrasonic missile that is iran's own production, and we have not seen anything like it in iran so far. th

was positive, its obligations are just as and washington has use a treaty to settle political store schools with moscow. and the treaty is set to expire in 2026. recognize our a full most senior security policy advise the pentagon. michael mullis, when he says it will not be much hot a task to reinstate the deal, making the world we live in a much more dangerous place. a given spite is attitude toward russia. generalize than in some of the people he is working under him. it's. it's going to be very, very difficult to reinstate any arms agreements or arm control arms control agreements, i should say in the very, very near future. i just don't see it happening. washington always seems to be talking down to moscow and, and we see that all the time and, you know, so i think the, the reaction of this will be from moscow to, to, to reciprocate and other seems to be a tit for tat. sewing on all the time anyway, so it really, really reflects the diminishing of any kind of desire to have arms control. and particularly this time when it's, when this world was so much more dangerous. so it's unfortuna

but here i want to say about something else, that this, uh, the notorious fifth clause of the washington treatyis the united states of america even if poland invades and there is something officially on tuesday. they are not official now. there are these 20,000 mercenaries who are fighting allegedly from poland volunteers professional military we understand this, but they are not officially there. i think it's definitely brewing in poland of course political crises, to close it they need to do something. they got involved in the game, not realizing that they would also be sacrificed, just like ukraine. here is the fifth point will not work, even if the fatherland is in danger even more screaming. now the troops will enter warsaw. no one will stand up for the west anymore, completely different tasks; their task is to bleed as much as possible to weaken russia, and the united states is now concentrating in the east. they need to deal with china's tea economy is huge competition and danger for american and economic hegelmanism. it is very clear to the representatives of the mercenaries that these

let me remind you that the omer treaty on the further reduction and limitation of strategic offensive weapons was adopted in 2010 in washington this year. the president of russia announced at the stop the participation of our country in the treaty as the reason for such a decision. vladimir putin outlined in detail in a message to the federal assembly in the west in the open. they say that their goal is to inflict a strategic defeat on russia and at the same time insist that american experts. as part of the agreement between moscow and washington, we looked at our defense facilities, including the latest , the president called such a situation a theater of absurdity, while he emphasized that russia is suspending participation in the agreement. they come out of it. famed american journalist semir hersh accused the intelligence services of acting against trump in order to prevent him from winning the election in 2016. this is the one the reporter himself, who announced the involvement of the united states in the explosions on the nord streams. now he commented on the report of us special counsel john durham on numerous fbi viol

as part of it's on vacations, russia claims washington has used the treaty to settle political schools with moscow. the treaty is set to expire in 2026. and a format senior security policy advisor depends a good michael muller, where he says it will not be a much harder task to reinstate the bill, making the world we live in a much more dangerous place. a given bite is attitude toward russia generally. and in some of the people he is working under him it's, it's going to be very, very difficult to reinstate any arms agreements are, are control arms control agreements, i should say in the very, very near future. i just don't see it happening. washington always seems to be talking down to moscow and, and we see that all the time and, and so i think the, the reaction of this will be from moscow to, to, to reciprocate and other seems to be a tit for tat, going on all the time. anyway, so it really, really reflects the diminishing of any kind of desire to have arms control. and particularly this time when it's, when this world was so much more dangerous. so it's unfortunate that this has ha

make ukraine a promise to join nato, such a promise is worth little, because according to the washington treaty, the decision to join nato must be unanimous, and, in addition, a country admitted to nato must meet many different conditions, and ukraine probably still far from that , such a consolation prize, more like a disappointing forecast. yesterday, ukrainian nazis shelled four districts of donetsk, gorlovka makeevka and hayish zaytseva zhitsa killed six people, were injured fighting continues near avdiivka. the listeners have actually already evicted civilians from the city and turned this city into a real fortified area. a difficult situation is also developing in marinka. although most of the city is under our control, the ukrainians continue to cling to the outskirts of the city and the fighting continues, we will find out what is happening on the fronts from the military correspondent of the media holding. komsomolskaya pravda, grigory kuboten we have a direct connection grigory hello how is the situation in marinka. hello, the situation is difficult, but our movement is slowly moving

polish radicals, who have been trying to do something for a long time, but fifth article of the washington treatybe involved the only country that has engaged and has the right to engage in the united states of america, which is now distancing itself from this conflict and focusing on future ones. as they say conflict with china but here is the following, even if poland gathers a coalition of thugs from the countries of the increase in fishing line and the polish military, who, in principle, are already present on the territory of ukraine by 20,000. yes and now that the fighting is going on. these complex ones just indicate that the poles are participating there, the army regularly participates there under the guise of so this will simply lead to a conflict between the baltic states and poland and russia, of course, if the nato countries want to get involved in this fight, this will develop into a more global continental and then a global conflict, but more than once the poles have been told that any of these advances of theirs , the desire to lead troops will not end, just this and the war will

years to the day before we joined nato, the original members of the alliance gathered in washington to sign a treaty president truman warned the group, quote, we cannot succeed if our people are haunted by the constant fear of aggression and burdened by the cost of incurring their nations individually, we hope to create a shield against aggression and the fear of aggression, to permit us getting on with the real business of achieving a fuller and happier life for all our citizens. same is true today. no nation, not ukraine, not the united states, not finland, sweden, any other country, can deliver for its people if it lives in constant fear of aggression. that is why we all have a stake in ensuring that president putin's war of aggression against ukraine continues to be a strategic failure. in his new year's address to the finish people, one of the funds until flaws of president vladimir putin's plans to conquer ukraine, a flaw that doomed stalin's plan to swiftly conquer finland. as he said, quote, as leaders of a country under authoritarian rule, stalin and vladimir putin fail to recognize that pe

just weeks after kennedy's speech, washington and moscow signed a partial nuclear treaty. is part of what president kennedy said june 10, 1963, during a commencement address at american university in washington, d.c. pres. kennedy: i have chosen this time and place to discuss a topic on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth is too rarely perceived -- yet it is the most important topic on earth -- world peace. what kind of peace do i mean? what kind of peace do we seek? not a pax americana enforced on the world by american weapons of war. not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. i am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a better life for their children -- not merely peace for americans but peace for all men and women -- not merely peace in our time but peace for all time. i speak of peace because of the new face of war. total war makes no sense in an age where great powers can maintain large and relatively invulnerable nuclear forc

june 13, 2002, the united states officially withdrew from the anti-missile defense treaty concluded by moscow and washingtonlimited the system to two complexes around the capital and in the areas of launchers of intercontinental ballistic missiles after 2 years. we agreed to have one complex. this treaty was one of the foundations of strategic stability, reducing the likelihood of a first a nuclear strike was indefinite, but president george w. bush tried to prove that the united states needed to defend itself from missile attacks from iran and the dprk called the treaty a relic of the cold war. in fact, he wanted to get unilateral advantages to achieve military-strategic superiority with the liquidation of the treaty on pro began the dismantling of the entire architecture of international security created in the era of detente. that was the day in history. install open. russian channels and all tv series movies and cartoons educational programs and documentaries destroyed the point of temporary deployment and the strengthening of the militants our correspondents from the front line in the zaporozhye region

treaty. this is a us rejection of a fundamental hostile policy in against russia ryabkov. he added that washington warned about new measures under the treaty, our country does not accept the language of ultimatums. apparently. this refers to the statement of the assistant to the american president. jake sallion. he said that the united states is ready to continue to adhere to the quantitative restrictions under the treaty, if russia is ready for this as well. now a short advertisement after we continue, do not switch. free credit card of alfa-bank with instant delivery throughout the country alfa-bank is the best mobile bank meet in marathon of discounts at sber megamarket new participant bicycle stels for only 6.990 rubles. sber megamarket bars barcelona burger. and barcelona chicken burger at a bargain price in tasty and to the point, and also in abundance. just order through food delivery services is dedicated. come to magnit and you will understand the energy drink and it is 69, 99. the vtb team can count on us when there is a lot of good they need to share, especially with their own. so i sha

declaration of war the columbia and president hit back by ratifying the dormant extradition treaty with washington. pablo escobar entrenched himself in nadine, protected by the population to whom he constructed homes. schools and soccer stadiums, he recruited at all may of 2000 teenagers. the drug loge babbling and politics is usually highly beneficial. playing on the robin hood images, defenders of the pool and victims of a repressive stage, they enjoy strong, popular support. and the mold are attacked by the states, the strongest. they become deep within the golden triangle. consol was a perfect example of this phenomenon. in the early 19 ages, the regions do you have politics changed radically. china had opened itself up to other nations. piece re ton of the kingdom of thailand no longer needed it's troublesome allies. subbing no further purpose. the king of heroine was chased out of the country and salt refuge in his home, and the queen saw set up his new the bar at trays and shown state without the slightest opposition. from the balmy's dictatorship, he must have made, paid off, paid money to

treaty. there have been growing concerns about a possible nuclear escalation between russia and the us. on friday, national security advisor jake sullivan said washington is willing to negotiate a new treaty which limits the stockpile of nuclear warheads. and allows certifications by both sides while claiming to suspend new start. russia has also publicly committed to adhere to the treaty central limits, indicating a potential willingness to continue limiting strategic nuclear forces through 2026 . we agree, or it is in neither of our country's interest to embark on an open ended competition in strategic nuclear forces. and we're prepared to stick to the central limits as long as russia does. and rather than waiting to resolve all of our bilateral differences, the united states is ready to engage russian now to manage nuclear risks and develop a post 2026 arms control framework. we are prepared to enter into those discussions . mike can advise me from washington dc on this mike since the end of the cold war, the us and russia had been cooperating despite some very real tensions, the limits their nuclear arsenal foot. today's announcement from the us in

on june 13, 2002, the united states officially withdrew from the missile defense treaty concluded by moscow and washington prior to that, he limited the pro systems to two complexes around the capital and in the areas of launchers of intercontinental ballistic missiles after 2 years. we agreed to have one complex. this treaty was one of the foundations of the strategic stability, reducing the likelihood of a first nuclear strike was indefinite. but president george w. bush tried to prove that the united states needed to be protected from missile attacks from iran and the dprk called the treaty a relic of the cold war. in fact, he wanted to get unilateral advantages to achieve military-strategic superiority with the liquidation of the treaty on pro began the dismantling of the entire architecture of international security created. in the era of détente, this is how it was on this day in history. normally you can't cope from here you can't see shore. it is necessary to wind up with a bucket to them and we will send other coordinates. normally , the topic is not afraid at all. i didn't understand here. save