bills will be passed and also because this will be written in golden left us in the history of john wayne smith and dean's yeah. today the supreme court upheld the 2019 gentleman cost me a reorganization bill. it's constitution valid, it's a and the process to follow. pakistan and categorically rejects the judgement, denounced by the supreme court of india. india has no right to make unilateral decisions on the status of this dispute to territory, which is against the will of the customary people i'm to pakistan. india cannot renounce international obligations under the pretext of its domestic legislation. and traditional verdict and hundreds have taken to the streets in pakistan to protest. india's move on to move and kashmir, demonstrators burned indian flags, and demanded that the decision be overruled. usually base political analysts cartoon show for us as the ruling of firms, kashmir status as an integral part of india. essentially, this is a reiteration of the fact that the entire state of the 1st world princely state of join push me, it is an integral part of the union of india. all thes

we're trying to pressure those election workers in wayne county to not certify the election results in that county. this feeds right into jack smith's case. that the then president who was not acting as president of the united states, he was just trying to cling to power. >> jack smith made a big point about the former president trying to disenfranchise millions of voters. there was a situation right there in detroit michigan. >> allegations again but those will be tested in trial. that trial where both sides would be able to present their case is no months away. >> what is your take away from this? this came down pretty quickly. if i'm not mistaken jack smith asked once, then asked again and said, hey, we really need you to give us something on this. the supreme court said, okay. >> the supreme court actually gave these tight deadline to both sides to weigh in before making this decision. it was clear that somebody, john roberts, perhaps others, on the court did want to at least take a look at this and decide whether to consider this for request. what we see here now is well, we know that the appeals court has also decided to move

wayne county. why would this not be critical? >> i'm not minimizing it. i just think the case jack smith has already built based upon, you know, the electoral certifications and his conduct on january 6th and his overall efforts of what he did in the white house as he, you know, watcheded the insurrection and basically cheered it on, i mean i think the case is just strong enough as it is. i think this is consistent with the case. i think it's what lawyers call evidence of his criminal intent. and i think it's certainly something smith will want to look at and may want to put into his trial plan. he's got a pretty good case already. >> and we don't know whether he has this recording or not, but it's certainly interesting. marshall cohen, i want to bring you back. as we saw in 2020 time and time again our system is built by doing people doing the right thing, withstanding pressure. even though these two local officials tried to rescind their call to certify votes for trump they were unsuccessful. how can be look ahead to trump's potential tactics if he loses again, and how do we ensure the

we have jack smith's case, we also have the ldl kkk case they got a huge boost today with the finding of telephone phone calls with trump and wayne county canvassers in 2020. so we've got a lot of different things going on a need to move through the system. but you know this is still a test for the supreme court because they're going to have to make a decision about the very question that you are asking me. >> it happened after the georgia indictment, it happened after the search of mar-a-lago, it happened to the judge in the jury six case. now it's happening to the colorado supreme court justices. the deluge of threats against the justices after the ruling on donald trump. that's next. >> well the color supreme court majority released its decision earlier this week, bearing donald trump from the states primary ballot and 14th amendment, some people noticed a pretty small but a very telling detail. the justices didn't sign their name to it. it was signed as per curium, that's from the court. many people guessed that this was related to the personal safety. by not putting their names on the decision the justices might be able to r

we have jack smith's case, we also have the ldl kkk case they got a huge boost today with the finding of telephone phone calls with trump and wayne county canvassers in 2020. so we've got a lot of different things going on a need to move through the system. but you know this is still a test for the supreme court because they're going to have to make a decision about the very question that you are asking me. they have to ask that to themselves. in a democratic system down the voters have the right to know whether this person is, in fact, guilty of the crimes and which he is accused or not before the vote next election. the supreme court can engage in sleight of hand. i imagine trying to resuscitate that personal doctor that says we don't change things about an election to close to an election. it would be outrageous to take a shadow docket decision and use it in this way, but i would not put it past down. they may say on the section three case that there needs to be enabling legislation by congress to remove someone from the ballot. there are 1 million cases they were trying to avoid this. first there is no way, lo at the text, at

the jack smith has, is it ultimately in almost all cases, republican officials made the determination that they had to act a certain way and it wasn't the way the donald trump wanted. here in wayne county, which, again, most of our viewers will know is mainly detroit, these officials went back and forth a few times. what ultimately happened? >> they had additionally, during the meeting, and this is important context, during the meeting they initially voted against certifying wayne county's election. so without their votes, the election and wayne county could be certified by the canvassing board. during the same meeting, after like the debate, negotiation, they voted to certify the election on the condition that there would be an audit of wayne county's election. that was what was approved in the vote. it was unanimous vote, 4 to 0. the republicans joined in supporting that effort. after all this occurred there was a large back and forth among everyone, an intense meeting. the two republican canvassers depart of the meeting with a group of people. outside of the packing lot is where this call from ronna mcdaniel and donald trump was received. they instructed these two individuals

wayne county commissioners, fired up the phone to record him having these conversations giving rise to as you note potentially some state law claims but also additional evidence of the wrongdoing in jack smith'ser -- the iphone recorder not because you're like this is a cool souvenir. you're firing it up as brad raffensperger because this is really legally objectionable, and i immediately need some evidence to cover myself from what might be a blatant act of criminality. i think that's fairly clear in all this. >> if i would lean into a phone call with a criminal, i would record it too. there's one other thing, too. we forget about the one other call, the one that almost happened. remember governor doug ducey when he was signing the electoral certificates. he's sitting there, the press is there, they're taking the pictures and all of a sudden his phone rings in his pocket. it's hail to the chief, and he takes his phone out of his pocket, and he puts it down, and turns it off. >> it's so true. i forgot gnat detail. >> and one thing about the state laws here it's -- i think the one wrinkle to this particular case. i think if i were the defense lawyers here for rona ronny mcdaniel and donald tru