thank you for joining us on wbz. watch wbz news for a complete wrapup.forget to go to the polls on november 6. thanks for watching. >> in two weeks, the first of the president of debates. live on c-span, c-span radio and c-span.org. watch and engaged. up next, your questions and comments on "washington journal ." >> i wanted to get more involved. it is watching information on tv. i love the information. i love current events. i love hot topics, things that come up. i love watching it case i loved pulling it up on my mobile device. >> she watches c-span on cox communications. c-span, created in 1979. brought to you as a public service. >> coming up this morning, democratic representative jim mcdermott talks about his bill mcdermott talks about his bill offering full

courtesy of wbz-tv in boston, this is an hour. >> welcome to the marc lamont hill debate. welcome to our listeners on wbz news 1030, online at boston.com and across the nation on c-span and a special hello to our spanish-speaking viewers computer vision, brain is not shakespeare bochum also to the candidates. they are the incumbent scott brown, former state senator in january 2010. and the challenger, elizabeth warren of cambridge, professor at harvard law school, who is making her first run for elected office. before we begin, a brief for data format. all us questions for the debate is that voters who submit them to cbs boston.com. each candidate will have 90 seconds to answer the same question so you can compare answers side-by-side. they will take turns going first. and they've each had their turn, will begin in no pain. every bottle in debate, during which the candidates are free to question address each other directly. the only hard and fast rules is not talking over each other. no filibustering and obey your moderator always. and with that, let's begin the prior arra

. >> welcome back to the massachusetts senate debate that wbz studios in boston. many viewers, mr. browncommonness cornbread and at cbs boston.com asking questions about abortion rights. i would like to expand on that issue in this way and yoko first-tier, ms. warren. the current supreme court is one of the oldest in the past century in terms of the average age of justices and it's entirely likely that whoever wins this election will be voting on the confirmation of hopeful nominees to the court. would you ever vote for a supreme court nominee who opposed the abortion rights guarantee of roe v. wade and which you ever apply to any other litmus test of a judicial nominee? 90 seconds, please. >> i would not and i don't regard it as a litmus test. the way i see this is roe v. wade has settled law. women should count on us. and i'm very concerned about how senator brown has already voted. when a lena kagan came up, she was approached by men who have been solicitor general of the united states, america's top lawyer. and when she was nominated to the united states supreme court, i was re

>> before i answer that question, thank you for holding this event, wbz. i want to thank professor warrant for coming out and i want to think the viewers for participating as well. i have been in the senate for 2.5 years. i have been married 26 years, and besides that and the birth of my kids. our senator has been the best thing in my life. character is important. she claims she was native american, a person of color, and because you can see she is not. she had an opportunity to make a decision in her career when she arrived to harvard claiming she was a native american. clearly she's not. that being said, i don't know and neither did the viewers know whether she got ahead it as a result of that checking of the box. the only way we will find that out is to have her reese really we do have her release our personnel and harvard records showing she did not have an advantage that others were entitled to. you have to pass a test and that is one of character, honesty, and truthfulness. i believe as do others that she failed. >> mr. brown, thank you. ms. warren,