generated goes to fix roads so there is no reason -- their -- i do not see why there should be a problem, y.a. revenue generated should not solve cab problems. also the -- i oppose that as well. and why is because we're on your front line. we're serving the public. we never did. we have burned this cabs, if they're going to be distributed, they need to go to the drivers that are taking the majority of the liability while driving. gas goes up, we pay the gas prices trade we get into an auto accident, guess what? our personal auto insurance is going up. we're assuming a lot of the human liability which is why i believe we should be the ones to have the medallions, not the companies. thank you. president chiu: thank you, next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i'm a civil rights attorney and paetec -- phd candidate at uc berkeley. i started my career representing taxi drivers. over the past three -- decades, taxi cab works have endured a legal classification changes and privatization of medallions, making it difficult to earn a living. this is an industry where you can work for 10 hours an

students to submit a video telling usco what part of the constitution is important to them and whgy.ae today we are going to go with noah fatsi at midolthian high school.c the topic of your video was on "the right to bear arms." how did you choose your topic? >> we wanted to choose a topic that affected a lot of people in america. right to bear arms was part of the constitution that affects everyone. if you don't own a gun, most likely somebody near you guys. people all around you have guns for protection, hunters, gun collectors, this was a topic that affected a lot of people who are probably important u.s. >> in your video you asked if the second amendment is a necessary right. what did you mean by that? >> we were wondering if the original 10 is still important to our society today. we asked if we are a society that needs guns at all or maybe just the right to have guns. >> can you explain the difference between the original intent of the second amendment and the current obligation to? >> we read a lot about the constitution and the right to bear arms in particular. when the fou