now confidently say that irmak controls everything, and i would not start saying, especially that yaermakreated a network of friends there, a network of friends in ukraine... created the armed forces of ukraine, civil society, the scientific community, there, figures of culture, sports, arts, oh, not yaermak. actually, ukrainians have created a network of friends, and i always explain to students the difference between effectiveness and efficiency, yes, effectiveness, well, if you do something, some result. but whether you effectively used all the resources in order to achieve a better result is not a fact, so i claim that there is some result, but if the network of friends of ukraine outside ukraine were moderated by someone other than yervak, someone else, we would have achieved better results, efficiency, i believe, yes... affects the situation in ukraine, but he is a very ineffective manager, and i say, ukraine will win, despite all the actions of the president's office. thank you, mr. victor. sir volodymyr, yermak has actually made a break-neck political career over the past 5 years,

regarding evaders, who knows , whether it would be accepted, that is, we cannot now confidently say that yaermak controls everything, and i would not began to say, in particular, that yarmak created a network of friends there, a network of friends in ukraine, created the armed forces of ukraine, civil society, the scientific community, cultural and sports figures there. of arts, but not yermak, actually, ukrainians have created a network of friends, and i always explain to students the difference between effectiveness and efficiency, yes, effectiveness, well, if you do something, there is some result, but are they effective, have you used all resources in order to achieve a better result, it is not a fact, so i believe that there is some result, but if the network friends of ukraine outside of ukraine, moderated by someone other than yervak, someone else, we would have achieved better results, efficiency, i believe, yes, yermak influences the situation in ukraine, but he is a very ineffective manager, and i say, ukraine will win, regardless.. on all actions of the president's office. thank you,

government, a figure who has built personal relationships with various influential people, represented by yaermakfrom rasmussen, the former general secretary, together with yarmak, they head. the working group on sanctions by sullivan, and this is actually the second most influential person in the biden administration, yarmak is in constant contact, that is, the americans perceive him a little differently than the ukrainian opposition, so we need to pay attention to this, and yes, well, peak, now it is peak yermak's career, which will continue, i wouldn't guess, because yermak is completely attached to zelenskyi, i don't think that there can be... some kind of separate career line for irmak, separate from zelenskyi. well, by the way, you asked, i can say one more line, but about a smart woman, a smart wife in ukraine they say, as the father says, so the mother will be, so characterizing ukrainian politics, you can say, as zelensky would say, so according to yeermakovsky and it will work. by the way, you mentioned something else, in fact, you mentioned sociology, mr. volodymyr, i... in february, 2

you are talking about andriy yaermak as a person which manages processes in the state, well, as someone am neither the first nor the second, do you remember mr. tkachenko, now deceased, but in the current situation yarmak has become one of those people. who was included in the top 100 most influential people in the world according to the magazine, and the publication called yermak a person who played and plays a central role in ensuring the work of the ukrainian government after the start of a large-scale war, to quote the publication: after the full-scale invasion, he brought zelensky's message to the world, creating a strong network of friends of ukraine from west to the global south, uniting them around issues from sanctions to the environment, since... 5 years have already passed since the election of zelensky on april 21, so can we not already talk about the fact that the era of zelensky is being replaced by the era of yermak, or is it has it changed a long time ago? i think that the public, this publication of the ranking in time magazine reflects a reality that has been obvious t

tkachenko, now deceased, but in the current situation, yaermak became one of those people who entered hundred most influential people in the world according to the version magazine, and the publication called yermak a person who played and plays a central role in ensuring the work of the ukrainian government after the start of a large-scale... war, to quote the publication: after the full-scale invasion, he brought zelensky's message to the world, creating a strong network of friends of ukraine, from the west to the global south, uniting them around issues from sanctions to the environment. since 5 years have already passed since the election of zelenskyi on april 21, can we not already say that the era of zelenskyi is changing. era of yermak, or has it changed a long time ago? i think that the public, this publication of the rating in time magazine, reflects the reality that has long been obvious to everyone, president zelensky cannot manage the state without his friend yermak, this is a tandem: we have the greatest leader and the most influential leader, but if no joke, then... i th

called, the coordination council, with ordlo representatives, which was proposed by kozik and which yaermakgreed to, and this, by the way, is the only document official, where there is a signature of the representative. of the real ukrainian leadership with the representatives of these occupied territories, it happened once, but again there was such sharp resistance that the president's office realized that this was a diplomatic mistake and refused to continue this process. and he did not leave, but if there was no resistance, or, let's say this, if the resistance was stronger, more serious, if the authorities did not abandon this idea of ​​theirs, tried to defend it, you know, and it would be a clinch, conflict with the patriotic part society, yes, they calmed down, no, they then proposed a military inspection of the ukrainian army with the so -called lpr corps, that is, as if you have an army and they have an army, and it almost... almost passed there at some stage simply because of that they refused, well , by the way, let's remember, including this so-called disarmament, which , by the

you one more question, because your opinion is very important to me, a quote was voiced by andriy yaermakesident's office, who said that, well, in principle, we are thinking about the fact that even after the war, although again after all, it will be difficult to understand what it is like after the war, while at this stage, instead of opening the borders for several years, so that people remained, rebuilt ukraine, why is it being asked now in such... a difficult time, when people are still thinking about how to go through mobilization, in principle, most men understand that they will obviously have to be somewhere, well at least to defend the country, and they already tell you in advance , and then you will still sit here and you will not go to your wife and you will not go to your mother, for example, somewhere there, that’s not enough, he says that we will not cancel the state of emergency for several more years, that is it means not to hold elections. i.e to prolong their power, they were supporters of the presidential and council elections while they had a great rating, not sinking,