you underestimate this figure according to the horoscope, he will be instead of gorbachev who yeltsin yeltsin we will give him everything sasha korzhak. well, what is a very interesting topic the era of change is not today. tomorrow everything will be turned upside down. here the girls live my new baked paternal sister. the latest collection back and forth italian haute couture blouse, put everything back in place. then i'll take mine too. what are you standing undress sharper? have fun, sorry. if you don't want it, we'll help you clean it up. we want to dedicate the first issue to the split, the writers being the main figure. i want to invite you, by the way, writers. of course, if someone has not been published before, then only for political reasons, he never participated in any shaking; now he is generally considered below his human dignity. e with embroidery in garden, i'll take a look now, maybe they left it in the car? yes? no, i came with her, how small she is with embroidery, where she could hurt, don't worry, in our house, nothing is lost. now find the salt will find oh, here it is.

underestimate this figure according to the horoscope, he will be instead of gorbachev, who will yeltsin yeltsin? here we will give him everything by sasha korzhakov. i think i need to change. well , what is a very interesting topic the era of change is not today. tomorrow everything will be turned upside down. and he is an actor. they treat belarus with respect and warmth, and when i arrived in minsk i was. first of all, they were struck by the wide streets of space and the sky for them is not just a second motherland. i don’t know how much god has given me. to live, but i think i will live it in belarus and when they ask me, where do you say i come from, it is here that the heroes found themselves and determined their place in life. i am proud that i am here, and even more proud that i was allowed to lead a team of belarusians. in general, i believe that belarus is a blessed place, a special place, and this place has a special mission. watch the project look at belarus on our tv channel. in belarus it is easy to explore only the report of our trip, the station baranovichi central historical pl

yeltsin. yeltsin was responsible for the dissolution, the liquidation, the abolition of the soviet union. it could have possibly been maintained in a looser federation but yelton had a will to power, gorbachev had a will to reform. the clash of men in history, and i usually do not do the allman history, really did play a role -- all men history, really did play a role in signing the treaty and then it wit -- very little to do with the nationalist. many had already received the property and power. gorbachev was the most radical thinker about security who ever let a major country. the most revolutionary radical in his new the abolition. he rolled back generations of military buildup. yet a vision, new thinking, which was a demilitarization of foreign policy that we would end thcold war and instead of nato, we would have an alternative to security structure, better equipped to do with pandemics and nuclear proliferation and climate crisis. he became a great believer in climate crisis. he established a group called global green about two decades ago. he was an interesting figure. i think we can take lessons today from gorbachev as we build up military armaments that will kill people and not help reconstruct a more fair and just world. amy: i want to go, katrina, the comments that gorbachev made about putin but actually the whole relationship over decades and the changing relationship leading many to question whether putin would even be going to the funeral. let's go to comments gorbachev made about putin in 2011. >> do you remember i said once i would advise vladimir to go? there were three terms. two terms as president. one is prime minister. three terms. it is enough. it is enough because clans are formed around him. amy: in an interview with the bbc in 2019, gorbachev appeared to defend putin's hold on power. >> our president inherited such chaos. and everyone thought he stopped the chaos and literally took everything on himself. press reports we're hearing that people want him to stay on. amy: that is gorbachev in 2019 and 2011. katrina vanden heuvel, if you can talk about his changing view right through to the russian invasion of ukraine? >> so mikhail gorbachev was a deep democrat, social democrat out of the communist party. he introduced the fairest and freest imprimatur elections to russia. he also -- the missing figure is yelton who presided over the creation of an oligarchy which continues to elude russia. so in that, he saw putin coming in, appointed by yelton come to kind of save the institution of the state, the nuclear institutions and installations as well from chaos, breaking down. he respected putin as the alternative to yeltsin but he saw how putin acquired more and more power. the process of democratization began under yeltsin but has continued vigorously under putin and he began to see that. the man, a leader who withdrew a country from afghanistan -- and that was that easy. there are transcripts showing the fights. did not admire someone who was waging war in chechnya, following yeltsin's path. he finally saw in ukraine -- by the way, nina khrushcheva knows this well, raisa was have ukrainian and gorbachev's family have ukrainian, he despaired of the war in ukraine and i think in that, he saw that putin -- he is the russian status. he is anti-communist, the russian world, and gorbachev was a social democrat of a more european kind. the battle between europeanists and -- continues. it has for centuries. i think you can see in putin marvin slava file. one thing gorbachev always said, at the end of the cold war, and this is something that was shared by george h.w. bush at the beginning, there was more winter

yeltsin years.— yeltsin years. one of the interesting _ yeltsin years. ves. i don't think it _ let the warsaw pact lives. i don't think it was — let the warsaw pact lives. i don't think it was important to him, the economy— think it was important to him, the economy in— think it was important to him, the economy in russia needed attention. i say economy in russia needed attention. i say russia. — economy in russia needed attention. i say russia, i do mean in the soviet— i say russia, i do mean in the soviet union, because he was a man of the _ soviet union, because he was a man of the soviet— soviet union, because he was a man of the soviet union. but the post gorbachev, which happened very quickly. — gorbachev, which happened very quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim _ quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim of— quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim of a — quickly, he didn't expect to be the victim of a coup when he went on vacation — victim of a coup when he went on vacation in — victim of a coup when he went on vacation in crimea. it was

yeltsin even then yeltsin told his oprichniks who flew to kyiv and held talks with the kuchma in the mariinsky palace. he said that you should wake up and think about ukraine every morning, but what did yeltsinthen, did he think that putin would replace him literally in a few years and this putin would start a war , first covertly and then -e full-scale war against the ukrainian state, obviously yeltsin did not guess and did not know about this, although there were probably certain prerequisites for that, we do not know that russia absolutely uh-huhed all the agreements in the format of the budapest memorandum because they guaranteed us after the ukrainian state gave er nuclear weapons er russia absolutely er calmly violated this agreement russia violates all the agreements it concluded with ukraine and denounces all agreements however, it is obviously obvious er and the reaction is indicative of these words of zelenskyi, which were uttered regarding the impossibility of negotiations with the russian federation, and dmitry medvedev, the deputy chairman of the security council of the russian federation, says that no one zelenskyi said that he would not conduct dialogue on the topic of who iss

putin owes his power to boris yeltsin who picked him together with his entourage as a successor, and putin is basically continuing the yeltsin russia as it was built under yeltsind then putin. gorbachev was a sworn enemy. they were with yeltsin. and putin, to some extent, inherited that. also right now, when gorbachev passed, putin is fighting a savage war in ukraine actually to remake what is seen as gorbachev made. gorbachev presided over the collapse of the soviet union. putin is trying to build it back by blood and steel. so, it is not that there is nothing strange that the present kremlin and gorbachev had lukewarm relationships. he was not announced officially by the kremlin, though some forces to denounce him as a traitor, and so on. but he is also no hero. and gorbachev would be a much more private affair. again, maybe his family also did not want her to be a state funeral, too -- did not want it to be a state funeral too. that is not clear right now. hashem: ok. maria, the 2021 poll that you spoke about which qualified gorbachev as the worst political leader in russia in the 20th century, is it mainly because of the perception that his policies introdu

here is the head of the protocol under yeltsin, it was yeltsin's time. mr.they never, firstly, remained in the kremlin. didn't stay overnight and so on. that's nothing about such a case that they forgot some, well, with a child and so on, he doesn’t know for sure, but how beautiful and fun it is. everything just happened, and moreover, i think that in general, in this scenario, this is all was. well, it is written in the sphere, it is invented and so on, because one reaction of the host is not at all artificial. yes, that says a lot. well, you can imagine what level, yes, it should be, how funny. it's funny that the daughter gives us. hope was left alone in the terrible kremlin well, among the torture tyrants there. and after all could same go, for example. to some terrible secret room where everyone is tortured or something else and could. why didn't they tell? how did you save her from there? by the way, well, what was the rescue operation to to snatch the unfortunate daughter from the labyrinths of the terrible black moderinths of the kremlin come on, you

owes his power to various yeltsin who pictured him together with his ent entourage as a successor and put in as basically continuing the yeltsin. russia as it was both under yeltsin. and then it kind of a came in put, gorbachev was a sworn enemy, they were with yeltsin and put into miss some extent and her to that. and also right now when gorbachev passed a boot in his fighting a say as to that savage war in ukraine actually to remake what it seen as gorbachev made gordon much off presided till the collapse of the soviet union. fujen is trying to build that back. you buy a blood and steel cell. it's not that there's nothing strange that the the, the president crammed one and gorbachev had lukewarm relationships. ah, he was not denounced officially by the cram window program when forces did denounce him as a traitor and so on. but he's also no hero and he's not, i'm glad yeltsin who hand of course a state very much a funeral. gorbachev would be a much more private affair. again, maybe his family also didn't wanted to be us. they few a few narrow to. it's not clear right now. okay. maria, the, the, the 2021 pulled that you spoke about which qualified to go, but to

ever seen him, but it means that this electorate is because boris pokalevich yeltsin that's what boris mykolayovych yeltsinsaid, because his rating at that time was 5%." we all the time accept i am very surprised by this, we perceive putin's departure from power approximately as the death of stalin i am surprised that stalin died in 1953 god knows when there were people who were at all adults when stalin died, there are practically none now , these people who are still there, they will be children then, but this magical event simply affects even our analytical abilities, we for some reason believe that here is putin, and it will be march of the 53rd year, and these heirs of his will come to the podium of the mausoleum they will say that now there will be a peaceful coexistence of peoples that it is putin himself who is evil and not the collective putin who surrounds him. immediately, but it was definitely an unchangeable evil for good, then we all saw the historical death of leonid brezhnev, which is much closer to us. it is certainly not putin, but this person led a war in afghanistan, and when she died,

yeltsin embarked on an arduous race to catch up in the pulse with every percentage point taking its toll. yukon of was revelling in his role is the end to yeltsin. throughout the spring, the communist was considered a short bit. i'm not sure about my president, the united then this is rhonda gafne. i'd like to quote the communist night may yeltsin once again look to his friends in the west. he convince clinton and the other g 7 members to meet in moscow. 6 weeks before the 1st round of the election. a p r triumph, his impoverished country, looking like a superpower, clinton and yeltsin discussed the situation. i think this nuclear summit will help you a great deal. ordinary people will see that you're doing the right things. they will out 10 percent. my vote. you know, you're a factor in this campaign bill. i do want to say something that could be used against you. i want to russian people to know how much the american people support rushes, commitment to democracy and to reform. and we've learned from our history that building a thriving democracy is not easy or automatic. but russia is making dramatic progress. please understand me correctly, bill, for my election campaign, i urgently need for russia alone of 2500000000 dollars. yelton's political instincts were back, as he borrowed west's money and campaign methods. with the

yeltsin died it was _ really matter. when boris yeltsin died it was very _ really matter. when boris yeltsined him. i lot of russians absolutely reviled him. ., ., ., ,~' lot of russians absolutely reviled him. ., ., ., lot of russians absolutely reviled him. i wanted to ask you about the olarised him. i wanted to ask you about the polarised opinion _ him. i wanted to ask you about the polarised opinion within _ him. i wanted to ask you about the polarised opinion within russia - polarised opinion within russia itself and also around the world. he is viewed in very different ways depending we are in the world you are looking at events today. absolutely. look at the baltics. the day after president gorbachev died the president of lithuania called him a criminal because back in 1991, gorbachev ordered troops to move into lithuania and suppress an independence movement resulting in the deaths of at least 15 people. in ukraine he is by no means seen as the person gifted independence to ukraine. no, people rememberthat for example gorbachev tried to suppress news of the nuclear disaster in 1986 a

it said and alcoholic name boris yeltsin around _ and alcoholic name boris yeltsin around the countrylaid this foundation for some _ not backed up by... which has laid this foundation for some of - not backed up by... which has laid this foundation for some of what . this foundation for some of what we're seeing in ukraine and in putin's rain, i guess you call it. leaving that aside, let's talk about something else which is unfinished business. michael, overto you, iraq. this is a massive over supplication. to me down in flames if you like. —— shoot me down. what extent is the power of the militias, a straightforward legacy of the way, not so much the invasion was conducted, but the occupation? you can trace it — conducted, but the occupation? you can trace it all— conducted, but the occupation? you can trace it all the way back, and when _ can trace it all the way back, and when i _ can trace it all the way back, and when i was — can trace it all the way back, and when i was talking about totalitarianism, the reason i can say that— totalitarianism, the reason i can say that with real

yeltsin and putin basically blamed it on him. just a rather than boris yeltsin who followed, arguably who has to take his share of the blame but ended up giving a state funeral and all the honours the state could possibly throw at him. yes, mikhail gorbachev, he gets the guard of honour, but he is noticeably denied a state funeral and arguably his family have been snubbed by president putin, the kremlin would say otherwise, would say the president has no room in a schedule, but frankly, leaders always make room in their schedule of funerals and their predecessors, and if they don't is always interpreted as a statement of hostility. it don't is always interpreted as a statement of hostility.- statement of hostility. it was clearly subterfuge _ statement of hostility. it was clearly subterfuge not - statement of hostility. it was clearly subterfuge not to - statement of hostility. it was i clearly subterfuge not to attend statement of hostility. it was - clearly subterfuge not to attend the funeral and not to give the status of a state funeral. boris yeltsiny of the russians who blamed him for the economic misery, because he started the he was given all of those honours, nevertheless. my question is, to those who voted for boris yeltsin in 1991, elected him, and the russian president, 56 1991, elected him, and the russian resident, ~ ., ., ., president, 56 million voted him at the time, president, 56 million voted him at the time. do _ president, 56 million voted him at the time, do they _ president, 56 million voted him at the time, do they realise - president, 56 million voted him at the time, do they realise they - president, 56 million voted him at| the time, do they realise they carry responsibility for the collapse of the soviet union in a sense? that is a very good — the soviet union in a sense? that is a very good question. _ the soviet union in a sense? that is a very good question. nobody - the soviet union in a sense? that is| a very good question. nobody wants to take responsibility, _ a very good question. nobody wants to tak

seems to me a difficult base in 1992, like the yeltsins, no, i was literally pushing who would hold the meeting of the presidents of armenia and azerbaijan. yeltsin said i should hold a miyazov, he said i was the host of the meeting. as the host of the meeting, i should conduct these negotiations. it was a real competition of people who realized that where they sit depends on their political weight here putin gives the impression that he didn't even understand it that is, it was either not interesting or that this is where such a loss of political intuition or opportunities comes from, that's all well, he understands it very well with sense in this sense, he didn't leave, he left with another in a different sense. yes, when he makes inadequate decisions there, but now uh, he spits . they want a prize from her, they want cheap resources for her in poland , but taking advantage of the weakness and assuming that the weakness will grow with her, they want dividends from her, which can be obtained thanks to this wickedness, he has no money left, he has closed the west - this is a plus europe, the states e- that is, it is significant a part of another

it is necessary to first praise yeltsin and participate in his election campaign, and then in a friendly way they demand to close the yeltsin's why ms. venediktov er, it was announced on the agent. and if there is no center, isn’t there a center that does less harm than the echo of moscow did so much obvious re-education and toying with the existing authorities, even in those moments, the diabetics did not ask for it the struggle for survival should be noted that mikhalkov you always sang that is the authorities mikhalkov is well-known in almost all creative genres: poetry, prose, drama, journalism, senior sergey mikhailov, the author of several anthems of the ussr, and then of russia. this year they awarded the next order of the hero of labor for what is his indiscretion on russian tv for inciting hatred inventing new fakes thank you very much for this high award in one vadim something biting award just listen to his speech after the award even bald himself in shock from what he heard it is already too much even for him, we live today at a time when a new russia is really being born there in the donbass , new russias are b

you saw yeltsin as a monument to gorbachev, no matter what he was for you are a living person who could be denied yeltsinmply became as red as a beet and that was the end of all discussions i remember i just think that i cannot sum up, you understand because that is because we can understand it only from a distance of 100- 150 years and we are contemporaries for for you gorbachev clearly, this is already a person with er, to some extent, from the textbook, for me, this is just a person with whom i spent some time there in various situations and when gorbachev was in power, when he was not in power, but in in any case, not enough time has passed for us to understand it, we understand it as a matter of fact, let's say it as a matter of fact, now we see that modern russia hates this gorbachev and this khrushchev. this one broke the union, this one gave crimea to the bastard. well, that's the whole assessment, that's all they why do they talk about them? they love lenin if according to their logic he created ukraine in general and they hate ukraine it is for me he took all these lands he created it but he ac

yeltsin announced the resignation of chernomirdian, who within five years was the second person in the state to save the economy, appointed a 35-year-old man from kiriyenko under pressure from yeltsintate house on the third attempt gave the go-ahead and serhiy vladlenovich became the youngest prime minister of russia kiriyenko nemtsov didn't just decide with the shadow, he just jumped out of it, but here in nizhny, no one ever considered them equal-sized figures, and when later , uh, it happened, this is a sensational appointment in nizhny, everything went from smart families, it was easy, and then they were very successful there was such a thing, but it is not a pity to take some young technocrats, who are conditionally speaking. well, the young technocrats are at the helm and will do dirty work there, it is understandable, there is pain, there is a pensioner, we are in dire trouble for a day, the kyriyenko government worked for only four months due to the collapse of the banking and financial system, russia once again found itself without a middle class on the verge of a rebellion of public servants and entrepreneurs. it was possible just to have a balanced budget . takes on the

yeltsin to form the state committee for the state of emergency in the ussr yeltsin was saved from the gkchp gorbachev only then, to humiliate and destroy gorbachev no longer influenced anything. yes, he tried to save the soviet union with a referendum, which almost no one remembers today. yeltsin in belovezhskaya pushcha. pushche gorbachev perceived what happened in belovezhskaya pushcha, as he called the political program everything, when i called on gorbachev and asked what i should say to journalists. i found him in a position to speak like this in deep thought. union is my drama, he tried save and revive the country you loved. well, bad luck in the west, they love gorbachev just because the ussr collapsed under him. well, in any case, it seems so, but look how the bbc presenter suffers when he hears from mikhail sergeevich unforeseen on the question of nexia's crimea , a man whose mother is ukrainian, father is russian is watching you . my wife is the late raisa ukrainian. that's what our society is ukraine as a state appears under soviet power from this it was the territory of russia, but when it is now divided into independent state, then it was necessary to discuss the fate of the crimea, for which the russians laid centuries here. they created this whole country and ev

yeltsin forever somewhere in the country to procure banana products, there are bananas and other things from boris yeltsin about banana products and which politicians, of course, had their opinion helpless gkchp. collapsed after the president of the rsfsr refused to carry out his order, a the president of the ussr in her imprisonment in foros recorded a dramatic appeal to the peoples of the world. vyacheslav generalov, who was then in charge of gorbachev's security in foros , refutes this, let's drive the car to you. well, the car has exactly the same connection to the house. you understand the phone, there is a special connection, the same is not. he said only in the office. he won't talk in the car. nowhere is self-isolation called, he understood that if he came to moscow he needed to understand some responsible decisions, which he was afraid to always make a responsible decision and he he would have had to make an unpopular decision that was unpopular for him; in the end, gorbachev, who returned to moscow, instead of immediately taking control of the situation, gave all the laurels of the winner as an emergency to boris yeltsina more than convincing explanation for his wife. raisa maksimovna , against the background of what she experienced, became seriously ill, mikhail sergeevich spent a lot of time in the hospital with her not in vain, then they quoted his words, which they considered. romantic i'm married not to the side married to my wife, this choice turned out to be in many ways, decisive for a further political career. gorbachev although he fought, the chances of signing a union treaty, even if a confederal one , remained. here are the leaders of the republics, including yeltsin, publicly speaking out in favor of the union november 91st press conference in novaya orel will i think that the union will be kazakhstan but always stood for the preservation of the union please discuss that the union will be a union of sovereign states tire the confederate states turned out to be a lie, instead of signing agreements between the leaders of russia, belarus and ukraine gathered in the hunting residences of belo

yeltsin and gorbachev seem to define much of the soviet union's politics. bush often took steps to remain actively neutral in the struggle, and only when yeltsin called him directly after the signing of the accords did bush take a position, a stance. why do you think bush remain neutral for so long? does that get back to this notion of trying not to interfere too much or impose his will? but to respect institutions? >> i think one of the reasons is that bush realized the tendency of american leaders to think that they can save the world. and orchestrate events in other countries. which has led us to a lot of problems. this is both parties that do this. because he had experience, he said there can be limits to american power. america can be very powerful in certain circumstances, in a hot war that's conventional we can destroy our adversaries. we can intervene. but to get into russian politics and try to orchestrate who is going to succeed, yeltsin or gorbachev, is delusional in my view. i think he did the right thing by being neutral, and it is because of his own sense of proportionality and balance and prudence. that's interesting, that there are populist conservatives, which in my view are not really conservatives in the historic sense of that world. they don't like george bush. but i have argued in the introduction that the founder of the modern conservative movement is a guy named edmund burke, a british politician. a member of parliament who supported the colonies and urged to the king not to pursue the revolutionary war, that we won. edmund burke wrote a famous book called the reflections on the revolution in france, which trashed the french revolution as a bloodbath that destroyed institutions. the person in the united states, the american president, who has since world war ii most epitomized edmund berke's view of the world's george bush. if you read a lot of the stuff -- i don't know if george bush, i always wanted to

yeltsin to form the state committee for the state of emergency in the ussr did not influence. well, yes, he tried to save the soviet union with a referendum, which almost no one remembers today. yeltsin acted in a proven hardware way. gathered the leaders and signed an agreement in belovezhskaya pushcha. pushche gorbachev took what happened in belovezhskaya pushcha, as it is called a political betrayal, when i went to gorbachev and asked what i should say to journalists. i found him in a position to speak like this in deep thought. union is my drama, he tried to save and revive the country that i loved. well, bad luck in the west , they love gorbachev just because the ussr collapsed under him. well, in any case, it seems so, but look how the bbc host suffers when he hears from mikhail sergeevich unforeseen , a man sits in front of you on the question of crimeaxia, whose mother is ukrainian, father is russian. my wife is the late raisa ukrainian. that's what our society is ukraine as a state appears under soviet power, and before that it was the territory of russia, but when it is now divided into an independent state, it was necessary to talk about the fate of the crimea, which the russians laid here for centuries. they created this whole country and everything. it is impossible to imagine what this man felt then , a man who went from universal true adoration to all-destroying humiliation. and this is a moment before the official resignation. i leave my post with anxiety. well, with hope. with faith, you will have your wisdom and fortitude after retirement. they travel a lot around the world. with raisa maxima they are warmly received gorbachev creates his own fund. and just like everything he earned at the highest communist posts of this apartment. in moscow, he earns money for his fund by giving lectures at western universities. he also writes books. one of the last remain an optimist. the gorbachev family has always been especially friendly, they always blew warmth and light, and mikhail sergeevich chose a place for his rest a long time ago, of course, next to the flight. ilya kanavin pavel alekseev news of the week having won a political victory over gorbachev, yeltsinut also took away almost everything, strongly, pressing him under domestic conditions, hurting his foundation and public opportunity. in other words, yeltsin demonstrated his dislike for gorbachev, which was, in general, quite in the soviet tradition of attitude towards his predecessors, which he continued already as a russian one. we say this because president putin is breaking this tradition. although i am sure that he experiences complex feelings at the same time. here putin comes to say goodbye to gorbachev one on one bouquet of burgundy roses pause. not a single word turns towards the portrait. touching the coffin is baptized and leaves the work schedule dictates the need for the funeral itself he will not be flown away from moscow, the guard of honor at the funeral ceremony is put up the telegram of condolences in these words is important only the scale of events that gorbachev launched neither a plus sign nor a minus sign mikhail gorbachev was a politician and statesman who had

yeltsin causes pride in two percent. russians are proud of the elimination of the iron curtain between russia and the western world, carried out by gorbachev and yeltsinperhaps almost all of these seven percent who are proud of at least something. here are the eras of gorbachev's rule left russia after february 24 of this year. tv, well, the living room of our today's heroes is a classic that we are going to re-invent, while love slowly and happily walks with the widget nikolay not at all in the kitchen preparing breakfast for wife and daughter. povahme them although the obligation of the word to his family, where did we get the apartment from? i got up in the morning and woke up while they were sleeping. i’ll do it in the kitchen today and everyone really liked it for the first time and i decided to continue with my everyone really like it, they hug and kiss, my whole family, 21 years ago nikolai charmed lyuba by taking her under his right hand on the first walk and saying that ’s how we are let's go down the aisle. well, then other advantages were revealed, how appetizing nikolai smells . what are you cooking, and today we have potatoes for breakfas

yeltsin needed you, as the hero won the elections. this is a look at events from today. and then there was no time to think august 1991. reception yeltsin here all rudskoy khasbulatov's inner circle in the defense of the white house in military skills came in handy much more rudskaya calls for afghan veterans to the barricades. then he leaves for gorbachev in foros, the regime in the control room of the aircraft for his grandson. no, i'm saying, it's purely a view. this is yanaeva. you don't even think. i say, he went, you know where we flew, we are approaching, standing near gorbachev's dacha, yazov kryuchkov and lukyanov. i go up to them or the guys, why are we here? we are already under arrest, who arrested him or vladimirovich himself. well, we go into dacha, damn it, towards gorbachev in the full version of beige, there was only an excuse. we hope that the relationship with yeltsinore trip to belovezhskaya pushcha. he cooks secretly from his deputy, well, journalists will ask this strange team with their flies, what do you see strange with many, we fly to sign an agreement with belarus on its economic cooperation, and in the morning i find out that everything is more of the soviet union. no. what is it called? am i some kind of puppy or there from the gate some day? i'm still vice president, and in 1993 yeltsin decides to change everything by his decree. he dissolves the congress of people's deputies and the supreme soviet by the majority of deputies. this is not accepted even in the dark by candlelight, because the light was turned off, yeltsin was removed from office and alexander rudsky was elected acting president 2 years after the state of emergency . after these events , 15 years later, i met grachev. himself came up to me, said, sasha, forgive me, he said, he ordered the etin to prepare officers to put tanks in front of the hotel, ukraine for intimidation

yeltsin has gone down in history and does not need lawyers. all the best. well, it seems to me that alexey pushkov, who wrote first, most accurately answered all this on his twitter. to whom yeltsin informed about the conspiracy in belovezhskaya pushcha and the dissolution of the ussr was the president of the united states of america, that says it all, and no lawyers will help here. well , this was not the reason for us to release our besogon, well, as if out of turn, it was like a special issue. the fact is that the cry sos arose in the atmosphere, because our besogon, which on april 16-17, it was interrupted in the seventh minute in yekaterinburg. well, what started? send calls , call me, call our studio, write letters, write, write on the internet, and so on and so forth. why in yekaterinburg the besogon broadcast was stopped 7 minutes after the start and dali was advertising for 30 minutes until the news that yekaterinburg had already been captured by our partners, and so on and so forth. naturally, we got excited. well, how is it that political censorship is like this in one place, it’s impossible in another place, like this maybe. false alarm don't worry, it was all planned, because the regional branch of the all- russian state television and radio broadcasting company has its own scheduled time when its programs are released, therefore, uh, just our bezogon coincided with the release of two programs. one is called beauty and health, and the other is called, uh, square meter, really. in fairness, i must say the besogon was shown in full. he was shown all the way in there at one in the morning. like this , and at 6 am is not the best time to watch our besson, but what to do, so say it's the company's right to use its time. and here there can be no complaints. it would seem to matter that he is no problem. no. everything, so to speak, remains in place, but among those letters that were text messages that were vulgar, and there would be one letter from the viewer, and our channel hmm, i won’t read it at all, only read it, and the end, when yours ended transfer me. suddenly, a very simple thought struck me. but we can become a mirror of ukraine, we, with our trusting hope, that healthy responsible broad gulls. such thinking and patriotic people who love their country will never allow it to be under the threat of collapse and external interference, and at the same time, listening to those whom you showed in your program. i felt absolutely clear. what a threatening conviction sounds in the mouths of those for whom russia is a territory, not a country, and the population and people are commonplace, and here i wanted to somehow return a little to the origins of what is happening. in ukraine what happened? who is to blame what is this it happened? here we blame the americans there, the english of the eu, they are so-and-so bad, and so on and so on, they took and turned the ukrainians against the russians, but dear friends. for what to condemn them, they performed their task, and the task, so to speak, is old. i personally take my hat off to them. they were able to achieve what they wanted. and we are that we are who our intelligence embassy and so that we are nothing. yes, i myself repent, a thought could not come to my mind, in a terrible dream i could not dream that , perhaps, the war between russia was uttered at all and ukraine is the delirium of a madman. you are not only here, you listen to what the ukrainians say when, just so to speak, they began to scatter to their apartments, and the republics of the soviet union with russia will not be interrupted. i really wish everything was good. at the highest level and always the same friendship of peoples. anyway , i think there should be a moot point. we could imagine. and even those who say it. how could this end? but there is a story. after all, there is, for example, a bismarck quote the power of russia, said at the beginning of the last century, can only be undermined by the separation of ukraine from it. it is necessary not only to tear off, but also to oppose ukraine to russia, play off the two parts of the one people and watch how a brother will kill brothers. to do this, you just need to find and nurture traitors among the national elite and with their help change the self-consciousness of one part of the great people to such an extent that he will hate everything russian, hate his own family, without realizing it, everything else is a matter of time. so here repeating. what is this process that we started, that we didn't see it? i am deeply convinced that the main fault for what happened lies with us, because we condescendingly watched the gas flow , people drive each other. everything, it seems, is going on normally relatives here and there how can it be that this led to what it led to, but for 20 years every day there was work every single day with textbooks that were sent with teachers who taught with an absolute look at history, when suddenly what was terrible becomes, not that beautiful, but the only possible. see how it gradually happened. the little book about the little rebels a-lyarmek is special for modern and malachi words and virchin kozhnuliter yakir confess about a young warrior, to the full not with crab illustrative sorogach and the mayor of the slammer we believe, because i blame father russia. we can see its details cold and on the good bows of the ukrainian rebels, the presentation of the insurgent tabards in the initial mortgages of ternopil earlier. i am once again this false ukrainian lad killed petya , he was going to ukrainian and call himself correctly and i want cheese from you i am natalochka who is she in the ass, not natasha you are such beautiful embroidered shirts of ulyana now to us that we are small ukrainians from these body kits ukrainians. he is your ilyas - this is a sleeping bag. who are you who me? and here's another quote. ukrainians are brutish russians who are ready to slaughter for the idea of ​​a ukrainian state. even your own phrase. they are ideal fighters against the red army, but after that they are subject to reorganization, like the most terrible barbarians michael wittmann galsturfer. ccc there is also a quote from another person, igor kolomoisky, from a speech in haifa, the ukrainian goi are even more brutish people. than a herd of russian hatters, brought to complete blindness of the idea of ​​non -deposit, turning them into a biomass capable of slaughtering even their own mother in the name of the independence of the ukrainian state. we took only a linguistic difference and put pressure on history, where we exposed the russians as the main enemies of the prosperity of independent propaganda after 20 years. we got ideal fighters against the russians in the form of their slavic brothers. now any representative of ukraine who killed the russian goy will be called a hero . i don't know, maybe it's all a lie, it's all a lie. neither one nor the other, not the third, said a word about it. matters this is the same as the memorandum malina dales fake lies can not be lies propaganda agree, all lies, but it's about and gone. it happened and what difference does it make to me, she said or not. i am ready to apologize to kolomoisky for quoting, as it were, his words. well, of course, it’s too late to change before the bismarck and before the german officer, but i’m ready to do it, but it’s not important any surname, put any name here. it's only a shame for someone who didn't talk about it called the meaning of it doesn't change it happened. and this is largely our fault. i do not believe that the people who are in charge of the foreign policy of the country of the new side of russia did not know this. i don't believe that they didn't report it. well, it can't be . well, it can't be. listen, 20 years, under the nose there is absolutely a change in the consciousness of an entire generation, and what did it lead to? what does this lead to? and now i will return for a moment to the letter of my correspondent, where he writes. i was struck by a very simple thought. but we can become a mirror of ukraine, and so i thought. remembering stanislavsky, we had such a task at the shchukin school. yes, i think in all teachers of theatrical russians, and i offer them circumstances. here also has presented to itself here i would be offered. circumstances here, what you did in order to start this process of the collapse of a country called russia, i thought what is needed for this . the exact task set is quite large money and time. also decently not 10 minutes or even a year or even two. but if it were so, i would have received such a task and would have begun to fulfill it, so that i would have found a region in russia in the middle of russia, a powerful industrial one. oh, which tvardovsky when you wrote the urals supporting edge the power of its earner and blacksmith of the same age as our ancient glory and glory of the current creator. i would find. i am getting richer in this region, in which there is everything copper gold ore iron malachite emeralds precious stones, stones, gems, iron ores, copper ores, platinum gold oil, coal, forests, all the first industrial enterprises. created in 1430. i'm not talking about the significance of the urals during the great patriotic war; the urals were the forge of victory; the factories that were transported to the urals began to work very rapidly, and powerfully and planes and tanks, shells, and guns, and so on and so forth, came from the urals. hurray was in many ways the key to victory in a terrible war, and here it is. in the center of this beautiful region, i placed a palace of remarkable beauty. i would put the best equipment there. uh, plasma displays, interactive communication, multimedia spaces, unique acoustics are all of the highest class and show there, for example, a cartoon from in the history of our country for only 10 minutes, from which we understand that everything that was before the nineties the last century is an abomination, a muck war. blood. slavery is injustice, and the torture of the people, and theft, and so on and so forth, what real life began? right now, in the new time since the ninetieth year of the last century, and there would probably be lectures that would talk about why we think that this time is the best, by the way, at the same time it would be possible in several. to remove the characters of our history, for example, alexander iii does not fit. he so to speak, it hurts. he's still a powerful figure, and everything was not so bad with him and he began to take the children there for free, so that they would go and watch, because they explained all this to small children, even, perhaps , preschoolers. i would arrange for them there a wonderful interesting program of special oasis and their lives in simple terms. i would not be slow and careful to tell them what i thought it necessary to tell them. so that certain information gradually flows into their minds, which in a certain way makes them understand that everything that was in that great russia is not great, russia is all slavery and filth, forget it. that's what's real. this is what should be appreciated. it is without memory. which is very beneficial for me who performs this task, for example, i would invite the director of this museum to a person who did not experience what people experienced when i went through the bloody destruction of the country, when i fell apart with mine. because i would tell the children that the union was falling apart under songs and dances for joy for pleasure people wanted this change. and now it finally came, i would call the most advanced historians and educators there actors singers makarevich would sing his songs wonderfully. and meanwhile, i would tell you that we took the crimea in vain. and what could be heard at these events, for example, but leonid katsva eh? i would say about who actually fought, but the great patriotic war. listen, because the great patriotic war was won. not a blogger of states including how it is not surprising for you to be the state of ukraine that is in this way even then. when did they fight? the state of ukraine was with the germans but, for example, what kind of dialogue could there be if at such a lecture the assistant to the deputy maria katasonova had a question, and to the assistant to the mayor of the city yevgeny roizman i said thunder. listen to the question and the answer to this question. i will repeat again. here you are talking about patriotism. came, it turns out, it is not necessary to educate patriotism, but maybe we will not educate the assistant of yevgeny vadimovich said about people who are not in odessa, the next way there is the road. call me in moderation, please, firstly, i don’t believe you for the beginning of the screenshots, because here you can have him ask about your questions, about yours. i actually have a misunderstanding, or you are shameless cynics. or are you just morons and when i figure it out, i'm here. judging by this answer, one could conclude that mr. roizman, and he considers everyone who thinks, not like him, either price tags, or morons, and then i would definitely invite the political scientist alexander baumanny, who would tell that e olympics in sochi, which was supposed to become a symbol of an open civilized russia turned into a symbol of the opposite and, of course, for example, i would definitely invite anton krasovsky to tell us about what is the difference between the side of good and the side of evil. listen, this is interesting. it would be very important to me that this is also implanted in the minds of those who visit our palace. the country of goodness is a kind of force that does not live according to concepts, but according to the rules of goodness, this side also says, you will share our laws. you share our rules. you trust our ideas about good, our idea better in yours. we have evidence that they are running to us, and not to you, your citizens are coming to us, and not to you. everything that has been done in this world is now done. we have everything that is all the power that is. now you have, including nuclear weapons. it was stolen from us by you, as it was, as we remember, yes, and after the war, this could also get into the minds of these guys who will come and go there, and many more people can be invited there. and artists organizers of exhibitions, for example, marat telman, we have already talked about him advanced a gallery owner who very clearly sees the image of our country and its history. here the point is in a very directed movement, for example, and in such a course called culture as politics, i would invite nadezhda tolokonnikova, the most famous political prisoner in the world. by the way, this is also an amazing story. let a separate lesson in the rubric be dedicated to heaven. culture is like politics, that is, what i would say, and what i would explain to the guys. let wright this culture, but it's not just a culture. it's culture that's politics influences politics influences consciousness. and it is interesting that internally at that time would gradually take place in the minds and in the consciousness of these young people who were not burdened with great knowledge. and those who receive this knowledge only in this direction, only under this light, only with this charge. and then time passed. my palace works successfully, almost everything is free for those who come there, especially for children and children grow up . they become 18 to 20 years old. they know that the language of the region, and i would explain this, wonderful people came out. like alexander popov inventor of radio kurchatov the great, scientist. and malinin is a singer grigory alexandrov director. kostya tszyu is an athlete and many many others. that is, in general, a sufficient number of people to feel a powerful inner self-awareness of their independence , here it is our region, our round. why do we need? we know that the demidovs, who started pouring cannons here, gave them to peter, who used these cannons to conquer foreign countries. let it be false it doesn't matter nobody knows the truth is important how i will present this truth and gradually mature the feeling. why at all? that 's all of moscow there is not even why. we can live a wonderful life here at home. we have all the gold. copper. uranus we have industry. we have more than enough. it's not just an idea now, it's already been there somewhere. and where was she, yes, quite recently. former governor rossel proposed to create a ural republic, and even regional deputies accepted this idea, moreover, there was already a currency. ural look sketch of ural franc not only in 1997 ural franc in denominations of 1 5 10 20 francs, were put into circulation at the serov metallurgical plant named after akasirov, the name could be paid in factory canteen shops and buffets, in other words, gradually from an early age over 10-12 maybe 15 years. i would be able to instill in the minds of young people that they can and must live absolutely independently and they will live much better than when they lived in this huge communal meaningless apartment. so that later and then these grown up young people of a sporty look. not having behind an idea of ​​what the history of their country really is. we would decide to stand up for our independence for the independence of tires, since there are a lot of baseball bats. and protests would begin for their independence, the struggle for it would appear unknown snipers who would shoot both one and the other. and what about the central power, and the power, it turns out, is faced with a choice. and how to protect the integrity of the country? they don't hear you. they do not want to hear you and cannot hear you. first i would try in a dialogue in a political dialogue in clarification somehow remove this problem. and there people grew up with whom it is impossible to speak this language, they do not understand it. they don't understand what it's about. what country? what is the story, what are you talking about, what are the conquests? what heroism? what do you mean, we want to live. here we have the right to live here and enjoy ourselves what we have. and the authorities, and the authorities got angry? the troops appeared. troops against civilians how is it possible? and then the leaders of this struggle turn to the empire of good with a request help, help, we are being exterminated. here, these nightmarish terrible authorities who are shooting at us do not want to hear us, they want to enslave us. and what's next for the conflict to escalate into a bloody civil war, where in a country with a gigantic potential for nuclear weapons? i don't even want to fantasize further on this topic. what can this lead to? well, well, let's think for a second, we missed ukraine, we all missed it. i don't even know how many years it will take for sobering up to come to people who understand what happened. what happened in the beautiful stunning rich country of ukraine what eclipse found? and i don’t want to agitate or blame anyone, it happened right here. where could this end? it seems to me that in a certain sense i personally heard something like that. understanding in assessing the time that is sung in yekaterinburg in this yeltsinhis understanding in the words spoken, and by the chairman of the government, mr. medvedev, at a report, at a report before the state duma. here listen. the main thing that we managed to do in these difficult conditions. i'll start with demographics. let's call a spade a spade in a certain period. our country is just dying. for the last three years, for the first time since 1991, the natural population growth has amounted to 30,000 people annually. increasingly, families are having second, third, and fourth children. even in spite of the unfavorable changes in the age structure of society, which has developed due to the nineties. we have achieved the highest for the entire history of russia a thousand-year history. i mean , life expectancy is over 71 years. and a few years ago, most men did not live up to 60. extinction of the country and what is the extinction of the country? what is the extinction of a country, when there is no tsunami, no earthquake, no war, no terrible epidemic, uh

yeltsin center is to cut off this umbilical cord that connects us with the damned nineties . creative approach on the site of the yeltsin center to make a training center for reservists who will go through this center to win to the front. here you are a populist the second blow is the closure of the gorbachev fund to cut off this umbilical cord. and let them go where the best german. we have been recognized. here, berlin the third blow to return the monument to whom on lubyanka square? i say again, these are symbolic things, but they will sharply strengthen the authority of the authorities and arouse the support of the people. and finally, to initiate a criminal case against chubais and escort our soldier officers to the front, we must front-line brigades to the songs and music and meanings of the great patriotic war. in addition to the chubais of the yeltsindy pulled up. including military equipment, we'll be back , we got a surprise from the premiere on the channel, russia hello, please excuse the seagulls today at 21:20 on the russia channel, there is an electric grill, there's a thousand, yes, you want to win five. run , register checks and participate in the visit on october 6th , the vtb ogo fast store team expanded with express speed. the loan from vtb said i want to expand in 5 minutes and up to ten million rubles without guarantors and vtb collateral, we help by deed bought a cream. dolgit bought for another from pain in the hands from 149 rubles. if you are not ours. at post offices, they are always available in stoloton branded stores and on the website in september, only at stoloto branded points you will receive a ticket as a gift. in eldorado low price guarantee for everything 1.99 eldorado is closer to the dream the first draw is already on october 1st drawing of 100 million rubles. you will have time to buy a dreamlion. did

yeltsin's government started moving in this direction and launched ambitious economic reforms the harsh socio-economic context almost immediately triggered this great power syndrome and by the end of 1993 yeltsin as a leader was surrounded by all kinds of populists grieving for russia's past greatness he succumbed in part to this pressure his war in chechnya was seen as a political response to imperial demand and during his second presidential term his line pivoted toward soviet patterns and policies of the past yet he rather quickly admitted his mistakes in chechnya and it's impossible to imagine yeltsin starting a major war with a neighboring country such as ukraine it's enough to say that in 1994 he signed the budapest memorandum which guaranteed the integrity of ukraine's borders in exchange for kiev giving up its nuclear arsenal and in 1997 he signed a friendship treaty between russia and ukraine in which both sides committed to respecting each other's borders and territorial integrity there is a reason why being increasingly haunted by the nation's growing nostalgia yeltsin still never followed it to its logical end wars of conquest and aggression fear loud opposing voices they become ugly disastrous and needless when put in the spotlight by free media and political opposition in the mid 90s yeltsin was unable to present his defeat in chechnya both moral and on the battlefield as a victory something that putin is seemingly still able to achieve after his presumed blitzkrieg in ukraine turned into a bloody stalemate with no end in sight if russia were a democracy it would make sen