"new york times" printed between 12 to 15 front page stories every day. half of these concerned war. times first story on nazi campaign appeared on page 5, on bomb of column of stories. less research, like that of. found that the times and media overall withheld or buried much of what they knew about the holocaust from american public and wrote the way that press in general, times in particular presented the facts, play a role in the gap between information and action. the they told the story of holocaust no chance of rousing public opinion. >> it goes on. it was not just the holocaust. that would be bad enough. also stalin. durante for 12 years was bureau chief in moscow, during that time, he was bureau chief when stalin was reigning in 1932. stalin ordered extermination of ukrainians, genocide, high cut off ukraine in every way to starve the peasants, because they would not join the communes, they would not allow their land that had been passed on from generation to generation to be taken by the communists, he starved them to death, millions, and durant

giving you additional information there have been 3 books written on "new york times" and holocaust. ject failure to cover it. one expert. another book. beyond belief. american press and coming of the holocaust. third book buried by the times. holocaust and america's most important newspaper. why am i getting into this with you? because the press for most part of corrupt. they are corrupt. i want to get into this. emory university professor, her book beyond belief, a broadly institutional problem, wrote: mark: this relates to what goes on in our country today, how media distort, lie and spin. >> germans were not hiding what they were doing. >> there were reports in europe for crying out loud. >> it dismissed what they said, because they were not considered reliable. taking direct aim at "new york times," professor, of northeastern university, scrutinized role of media during the holocaust but "new york times" in particular. she has written about how the "new york times" failed in its coverage of fate of european jews from 1939 to 1942. she asked what was it about prevailing press san

but then as you mentioned, we all, we have this amazing visual investigations team at the new york times. and i essentially went to them and said, here's where this happened. here's the coordinates in the time of the strike. tell me what you can tell me. and they came back with with you. they had found footage from that day that appears to show the very striking question. they were able to pinpoint it using their own process. and it just led to sort of the immediacy of the, the reporting that you could see it. and in a lot of these images, you can see women and children are in the area before the strikes happen. i mean, it is amazing to sort of look at the, those clouds rising in the videos a lot. you know, just, you know, choreographed along with the writing as you told the story. what happened on eric, when you, when someone write a piece like this in drops, you know, essentially a journalistic bomb. as you have my, my experience is that lots of other stories begin to come in. other pieces, either that corroborate or are in conflict with the stories begin to come in and help fill out a

she's contributed to the new yorker, the "new york times" and many others. and so without further ado please join me in welcoming mike and alexis to the stage. hooks well high. >> hello. kirk's first of all congratulations for this new book. i know all of you have picked up because you are here tonight. but if i can encourage you to overspend i would recommend buying a second copy or getting it from your library

on an audio — york times is working on an audio only— york times is working on an audio only app _ yorke kind of like the room podcasts playerl like the room podcasts player where — like the room podcasts player where presumably _ like the room podcasts player where presumably they're i like the room podcasts player. where presumably they're going to distribute _ where presumably they're going to distribute their— where presumably they're going to distribute their shows - where presumably they're going to distribute their shows and i to distribute their shows and may— to distribute their shows and may be — to distribute their shows and may be expended _ to distribute their shows and may be expended with - to distribute their shows and i may be expended with exclusives and may— may be expended with exclusives and may be, _ may be expended with exclusives and may be, really— may be expended with exclusives and may be, really trying - may be expended with exclusives and may be, really trying to - and may be, really trying to bring — and may be, really trying to bring people _ and may be, r

so "the new york times" has done something shocking even for them.e legal documents that belong to project veritas, just days after project veritas was raided by joe biden's justice department for political reasons. "just a coincidence." we've got details, straight ahead. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: we will get to the bottom of what happened on january 6th. an exclusive first look. >> [shouting]. >> tucker: how much of what we were told about that day is a lie? >> if that was an insurrection it was the most poorly conducted insurrection ever. >> streaming now on fox news. >> tucker: we put a trailer up for our documentary. it was not popular on the other chance. we made a new trailer. we think it's pretty good. an interesting story. during the final days of the last election >> tucker: we put a trailer up for our documentary. it was not popular on the other chance. we made a new trailer. we think it's pretty good. an interesting story. during the final days of the last election project veritas look into the story of the missing diary of ashley biden.in they didn'

new york times retracted the story. they moved to a different story. khater is seen spraying bear spray into the face of officer bryan sicknick. it was bear spray. it was bear spray that killed officer sicknick. revolver news found the video shows no spray coming out of the container. it's a lie. sure enough, eventually, the media admits that revolver news was right. the dc medical examiners today ruled that capitol hill police officer brian sicknick died of natural causes. officer sicknick died of natural causes. he did not die at the hands of the maga mob. and yet you still see in the mainstream media this reporting that it was a deadly mob. a murderous mob. murderous mob. the murderous mob. deadly january 6th attack on the capitol by a mob of trump supporters. they got the word deadly, from this false reporting on sicknick. it was a blood libel. and again, the national security state was operationalized on the basis of that narrative. just as non existent

that is that that "new york times" bestseller list is an editorial process.y claim that as an editorial product. the problem i have at that is that is supposed to be simply a data-driven lift and it is not. and so that sold the most copies of sea number when the book, the number one best-selling book did not appear as the number one best-selling book on the "new york times" list. and sometimes did not appear at all onid the list. and that is one of unfortunately many, many examples, increasing numbers of examples of the media irresponsibly in my opinion, distorting the news. >> so margie when it comes to conservative book and award, how are they treated? pulitzer prize is, book of the year, et cetera. >> they are ignored. they are largely ignored. they are marginalized. it is very, very rare you will see a a conservative book when any sort of awardaw where there is an editorial discretion and judgment as opposed to simply looking at the a sales numbers or the quality of the work. when i sit editorial discretion when someone can put together their list and tha

and the new york times covered it. the some of the new york times accidentally did the real reporting this past weekend. not sure what happened, but i can tell you, someone's going to lose their job. bruce's, when new york times revealed that the us hidden errors strike that kill dozens of civilians in syria in 2019. but guys in is intentionally kind of a chevron, d 70. they killed 70 n as in pe paul in syria with just a few bombs. but at least our military took full accountability and let everyone know they did it. they, they sent out emails they went on late night, showed like calling in and jimmy kimmel to talk about it. top pentagon brass even did that. other car pool carry. okay. with james gordon, where they sang whole areas off k, about massacre in children. they told merge on the pentagon website like mugs and shirts and stuff. they even a beer co, he's dead, said shari about killing. they'll do this in people in syria country. we shouldn't even have been involved in, but we were because they're outside our cen

i would like this to become a habit at the new york times. i'd like to see them continue down this path because we have known of for years from reporting on the ground from a independence social media reporting and independent investigators in these countries that this has been happening. we've known from the documents leaked in particular by a guy named daniel hale, that this was the norm, not a sort of aberration. he now been in prison as a reward for telling us this. so, you know, it is there, there is courage in the sources named an unnamed behind this story. and we need more of that courage because many, many of these stories are doubtless being covered up in part out of fear of, of going to prison for telling people what's happening in each paragraph in the story seems more and more extraordinary. one of them do accept the claim that those 60 people 3 in 4 of those killed where a quote likely come buttons. well, i'm a 100 percent convinced with the military admitting to 80 dead that those 80 dead were all human beings. ah, and people wi

beard and julia child, they did not quite have positions like being the food editor of the new york timeset they were so well-connected to publishers of the era and others who were gatekeepers in that time. any sort of alignment with them could open up access to capital and opportunity for these women. we see that in the story of someone like marcella. i will not talk about her too much just yet. >> before we do a deeper dive into some of the subjects, can you comment on food as a yardstick as history and culture in a society? elena zelayeta food -- mayukh sen: food is an object almost all of us consume. it is very popular and tempting to believe that food unites us and brings all of us together. i am a bit skeptical of that notion. i do feel that in narrative terms, food can tell so much about where person comes from, the culture that shape them, the values in which they grow. i believe the same holds true for all of these women. this entire world. that is why i am so excited by the prospect of writing about food. as kind of a window into understanding humanity a bit more. host: why did

i don't sit there and read the blurb of the paper in "the new york times." i look at the paper.ery single day to some of the world's best epidemiologists about the data on an ongoing basis. these people -- there was never any indication that they knew the paper, cited a paper, or even criticized a paper, not one, and as i say in the book, i mean, there were things that were medical words being mispronounced and the meaning. there were statements being made -- i was looking around and sort of saying "did anyone else hear this but me." i never work with people at this level in my career as i did in that task force and i'm not saying at a high level. okay, i'm staying at a low level. i've worked with some of the best medical centers in the country, university of pennsylvania, university of chicago, i was a medical student at stanford university, mount zion the new york. i would always say -- i'm not sure these people could have been assistant professors where i work. as a lack of critical thinking, a lack of preparation, no one cited data but me. >> tucker: joe biden pulled the uni

were stolen, did the doj go and the fbi go barging through the doors of journalists at "the new york timesurse they didn't. what the southern district of new york, the department of justice has done to james o'keefe and his fellowey journalists is outrageous and its lawlessness. and i laughed a moment ago and they said in the search warrants the crime was identified as this prison a felony, which is a dusty old law that is a joke that is not enforced anymore. it says you have a duty to notify law enforcement. today that only applies to public officials. first of all, this isn't a federal case. this is a state case. i've diary, for god sakes. why are the feds in this? yes, there are nine federal statutes on theft, they all deal with theft of government property. this isn't government property. second of all, merrick garland's dirty finger prints are all over this because under doj rules, he has to sign off on a warrant or a subpoena for a news organization. third, this is his order four months ago. merrick garland, there's his signature. prohibiting warrants and subpoenas on news organizati

this is in the "new york times."he house is coming into session, infrastructure and social spending bills, we expect them to be on the floor. thank you for being with us on " washington the speaker pro tempore: the house will be in order. the chair lays before the house a communication from the speaker. the speaker pro tempore: the speaker's room, washington, d.c., november 5, 2021. i here

biden's daughter ashley.fo according to o'keefe, within an hour of the first raid last week, "the new york timesached out for comment. how did the times know about the search warrant so quickly? i don't know, it's just one of those many unanswered questions, kind of sounds like that predawn raid on roger stone, fake news cnn cameras just happened to be there at 5:00 in the morning. anyway, here to explain more, first interview, the ceo and founder of project veritas, james o'keefe, along with his attorney. welcome both of you. i think it's important to establish other media -- and i'm not comparing it to other media but other media use undercover cameras and have for many years, even 60 minutes and nbc's "to catch a predator." this is not a new form of journalism.. you acknowledge that. >> well, sean, on saturday morning, i acknowledged that but i woke up to a predawn raid. banging on my door, i went to the door to answer the door and there were ten fbi agents with a battering ram become a white blinding lights, they turned me around, handcuffed me and threw me against the hallway, partially clo

is it from ford, daily new york times or fake headline? >> new york times. kennedy: it's forbes. und, to appease. carol. the great outdoors was made for white people. new york magazine, the nation for a fake headline? >> new york magazine. kennedy: you know, from the nation. okay, that's okay. >> i knew it was real. kennedy: you get two points for this, ethan, brave woman says she doesn't like underwear, is that new york magazine's slate or fake headline? >> fake headline. kennedy: no, new york magazine. you can win it all with your final headline, thete rugrats we always we are icons. is it mike.com, variety or fake headline? >> mike. kennedy: that is right and last minute, i walked off home. anthony fischer with the whole thing. another in the trashcan. party panel, thank you so much, that was great. competitive until the end. thank you all. coming up, a favorite new game, the rich and famous, the panel is wealthy back up with something crazy they bought or have done, you can play along, next. ♪♪ welcome back to our biggest usually game night special, totally brought to you. we

look -- look at this tweet from the "new york times": i guess, according to the "new york times," that suv just drove itself. the media mal practice doesn't stop there. imagine if it's the other way around. after a wave of shoplifting by criminals in northern california, members of the media don't want us to use the term looting anymore. look at this headline from an abc 7 article in the bay area: don't believe your lying eyes. it's mostly peaceful shoplifting after all. this is all the natural consequence of the left normalization of criminality and property damage. what is next? calling statue destruction community revitlization? former president trump warned this would happen. removing statues of thomas jefferson happened in new york city this week and statues across america. he said it would not stop. it would go to the founders. he was right. this is fruit from the same poisonous tree and part of the plan to destroy america as we know it and tear down our most sacred institutions and sense of patriotism and sovereignties and tear down freedom of speech and basic law and order. the

the new york times editorial just the other day that schooled the joe biden did in denver present said they should return to political theology into moderate policies and value braided and chief white house steps: tweeting times in the tutorial from the day before the inaugural ration, like healthcare and climate. it sounds like an about-face printed. >> is true the media has pushed fighting to be left-wing and joe biden has been left-wing in the same time also try to portray him as a moderate and i think would happen with these latest editorials with new york times, their interest is in preserving car the understand what happened on the disaster that was in virginia which was a democrat state. and when you're talking about all of these house races, and this is probably democrat areas, they are worried about a bloodbath and just wanting him to pull back because the pushing too far. >> if this is about white supremacy. others have said this as well, how does the commonwealth also lacked as lt. governor winston the first black woman elected statewide of these voters are just racist party

. >> and new on book tv we are live with author and new york times columnist ralph who over the next two hours will take your calls and questions via e-mail, text and social media. the most recently the deep places, memoir of struggle with lyme disease. >> new york times columnist, author doses douthat. before we get to religion, politics, et cetera, let's talk about your book the deep places. >> we were planning on having more kids and lived in connecticut and our families were from the northeast and we had an idea of escaping from the corruptions of the belt way and the swamp and getting out of dc and getting back to where we have grown up and in my case especially i had this idea that we were going to live in the country, we were going to have a farm, we were going to raise chickens and spend a lot of time with our kids and not spend time on phones and computers and we put our house on the market and sold a lot more for what we expected. the dc market was crazy back then and we took the money and, you know, i like instead of doing something sensible like investing in bitcoin, you

those debates i think all of that seems like a good person for a national newspaper like the "new york times" to hire at a time when newspapers everywhere are bringing bloggers on board or figuring out how to integrate the neural new journalism into the old system i guess. too that was part of the story. the other part was i am some sort of religious conservative. the times at that point never had explicitly religious conservative on its op-ed page. i think there was a desire from the people who ran the newspaper to add that kind of voice to the discussion. so in that sense i was in the right place at the right time which is a large part of what you need to do to get an extraordinarily fortunate job like the job and i am lucky to have at the paper. >> it was in 2012 your book, bad religion camero out. i want to read a quote from that. the eclipse of christian belief have led inevitably to the eclipse of public morality. that is strong stuff. that's a book i wrote about three years after he started at the times. the argument and that book, it was partially a history it was storytelling it was

we're talking to the "new york times" reporter who exposed the story. we're back in a moment. ♪ -i love this brand. whoa! am i floating? -not exactly. that's bargain bliss setting in. you're basking in the glow of premium wines at deep discount prices. -feel so tall right now! -i know, right? could you just. while you're up there? -♪ grocery outlet bargain market ♪ [announcer] our amazing 20 percent off wine sale is going on now through november 9th at your local grocery outlet. >>> welcome back to nbc bay area tuesday tonight. history is cruel, disturbing stories emerged that tarnished california's gold rush history and prompted u.c. hastings to change the name of it famous law school. hastings college of the law is named for the founder a gold rush era rancher and california's first chief justice. in the 1870s he donated the $100,000 that began the building of the now famous law school in san francisco but a recent "new york times" report that published last week exposed that hastings financed a mass slaughter of hundreds of members of the tribe who l

the new york times and bloomberg and stanford university, he also published those reports. you can find them online, they're not buying. so it has been the case that they have been supporting surplus . lemme and that today. that's what elections mean. elections don't mean only a serious test of public opinion as what they meant in 2011. they mean are online movements that can be manipulated in social and political sentiment that can be manipulated, manufactured the idea that popularity is something that you can hold in your hand and put in your pocket is a myth. it's something that is curated, it's wipe and, and it's fashioned. and that's what, that's why over the last 24 hours, we can see our social media end of year, a massive, massive uptick in unorganized traffic and things trickling down through civil society and to libya, trying to get traction for civil lamb and trying to push his agenda on to live in people just the iconography alone. i can also just the final asked about what he chose to were. it wasn't one that was the only thing left in his closet had a bit more

the new york times as identified, the task force 9. they have a lot of leeway. they can sidestep all or circumvent almost any, you know, the normal process by which ash rugs are approved. so they could order an air strike from the ground, cutting out the chain of command, and the people they said to investigate the scene of this bombing were the same. people had ordered it and they came in and they reported that it was all awful by rules of the law because most of those who would be killed had been competence. and that only a small number of civilians had died. they bulldozed the site, they bulldoze the site, all evidence is, is gone. there was no official reprimand. those nobody was, are held accountable for this. it was basically ended there. and what they argued laser death told by the way, was revised from the 50 that the initial shocked officer reported to 60, to 70 to 80. now we're hearing from the pentagon respond in response to the new york times am. and what they're saying is that this was self defense. so bombing a crowd, a crowd of mostly women and ch

it is based on the groundbreaking new york times series about legacy of slavery in united states. we will talk about the project -- it symbolized -- all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. a jury in brunswick, georgia, is set to determine the fate of three white men charged with hunting down and murdering 25-year-old black jogger ahmaud arbery. lawyers for the defense made closing arguments monday. a nearly all-white panel of 12 jurors and three alternates is set to hear a rebuttal from prosecutors today before beginning deliberations. defense attorney laura hogue, who represents greg mcmichael, the former police officer, blamed arbery's own actions for his death. and she drew outrage over these comments. >> turning ahmaud arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought ahmaud arbery to satilla shores. in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long dirty toenails. amy: hogue's comment drew audible gasps from the courtroom. ahmaud arbery's mother, wand

"new york times and stanford published those reports online. they are not buying.t has been the case they have been supporting saif al-islam. that's what elections mean. elections don't mean what they meant in 2011. they mean online movements that can be manipulated and social and political movements that can be manufactured. the idea that popularity is something that can be held in your pocket is a myth. it is fashioned. that's why over the last 24 hours we can see on social media a massive uptick in untraffic and things trickling down into -- just the iconography alone. nastasya: ok. >> and what he chose to wear, it wasn't like that was the only thing left in his closet. nastasya: ok, i want to bring yusuf in. we know there have been a huge amount of international involvement in libya, particularly the last few years. it is evident that saif al-islam blames the u.s. for much of what has happened since 2011. we have seen involvement from turkey, the uae, and russia. who do you think is backing saif al-islam now? is it moscow? >> i think moscow is one of the major

, the washington post, the boston globe and the author of numerous books in his most recent new york times bestseller, is american moonshine, john f. kennedy in the great space race. just before we begin i ask you please turn off your cell phones and other electronic devices and remember to keep your mask on. please note with the exception of her house photographer, we are not permitting photography this morning afraid and please join me in welcoming our guests. thank you. [applause] >> good morning, welcome bob fast, robert caro and as the added attraction, bob woodward and what an honor it is to spend some one-on-one time with you. new york historical society and will then going to open it up for questions and some were putting up cards out for about a 40 minute conversation and with trent his book, just number one in the charts, he done incredibly well and so much news going on. i would be remiss to buy did not ask him the burning question of the moment braided right out of the gate and that is when did you first know robert caro. [laughter] >> i think about 25 years ago. he was in new

such as "the new york times" and they have said it is not paid for.fact it is going to cost hundreds of billions of dollars more than what they're projecting in fact add about $800 billion worth of debt over the first five years. elizabeth: the other thing too is, the democrats, by the way, former treasury officials work at the cbo they do have the experience here. for them to hold them, democrats hold them up as a gold standard and now to gas light this is so pathetically absurd. the other thing, when you use the irs, right, go after the rich, the rich can shelter income. they can afford lawyers and accountants. when you double irs enforcement power, they go after the little guy, small businesses who can't afford that. small businesses are hammered by the pandemic, hammered by inflation, hammered by a labor shortage. 20 million people, a stunning number, 20 million people quit their jobs since may that makes it tripping hard. should the white house back off, should democrats back off? >> they absolutely back off. folks are, the irs is one of the most

engaged in those debate it made me seemed like a good person or national newspaper like the new york timeshire at a time when newspapers everywhere are bringing bloggers on board or figuring out how to integrate the new journalism into the old system so that was part of the story and the other part, i am a religiouse conservative and at that time's, i believe never had an explicitly religious conservative on its op-ed page and i think there is a desire from the people who ran the newspaper to add that kind of voice to the discussion so in that sense, i was sort of in the right place at the right time, large part of what you need to do to get an extraordinarily fortunate job like the one i am lucky to have the newspaper. >> in 2012 your book bad religion came out, i want to read a quote from that. the eclipse of christian belief led inevitably to the eclipse of public morality private virtual like. >> that strong stuff. i was a book i wrote about three years after i started at the times. the argument in that book, it was partially history, storytelling, a book about the decline of instituti

the new york times columnist and karen is calling in from tampa.ood morning to you or good afternoon to you. >> good afternoon. mr. douthat, my question is, i'm very -- i'm confused by the conservative christianity's concept of the minionism to take control of seven cultures. seven mountains, family, religion, media, entertainment, business, and government. how, why do they -- to me this conflicts -- is in conflict with the constitution on a very basic level, that is with the idea in article 6 that there should be no religious test for anybody, for any qualification of office and also, that there should be -- the government in no way make any law of establishment of religion. >> karen, do you know where dominionism comes from? >> okay. that's -- i would like to understand more about that, but-- >> all right, let's see if mr. douthat help us out. >> sure, yeah, i'm happy. dominionism, there are a bunch of different ideas that go under that label, but they're sort of an extreme form that's a very unusual perspective and not a major influence on our s

you wrote another piece called the big lie and was about "the new york times" book review. what was that about? >> guest: this wasn't a new story for the insiders on the book publishing world but unfortunately, it is used to most that are consumers of both's on the bestseller list. they've actually claimed that as an editorial product. for a given week it should pretty straightforwardly be the number one duck. number one best-selling book and sometimes it didn't appear at all on the list and that is one of unfortunately many, many examples, increasing numbers of examples in the media irresponsibly in my opinion. >> host: when it comes to conservative books and awards, how were they treated, pulitzer prizes, national book awards, book of the year et cetera flex. >> guest: they are largely ignored and marginalized. it's very rare that you will see a conservative book when any sort of award where there is, you know, editorial discretion and judgment as opposed to simply looking at the sales members or the quality of the work. when i say editorial discretion, i mean, when someb

the "new york times" was a liberal and has been for decades. the problem is liberals didn't have the courage in saying to the radicals we have may agree with you on a lot of these policies but you don't get to destroy individual rights and individual freedoms and freedom of the press and the ability to think broadly. you don't get to destroy that in the name of your agenda but liberals are embarrassed. they have gone along with the woke because they decide the woke have a point which is ie are the beneficiaries systems of power. i did inherit this newspaper, i am privileged so how can i a privileged white person safe to nikole hannah-jones that my standards of individual rights are correct while she's arguing those standards are merely be enshrinement of hierarchy that keeping might vanish in the first place. there is this deep level of guilt. it is linked to white guilt that has pervaded so much of our institutional life and it means there's almost a waiting and ready surrender caucus inside these institutions the woke up taking advantage of.

nikole hannah-jones cover civil rights and racial justice for the new york times magazine.creator of the 1619 project for, which she won a pulitzer prize in 2020. and the new book called the 1619 project, a new origin story. nicole, it's great to have you. on congratulations on publication. this has become such a part of the american discourse. i think to a degree that i imagine you didn't necessarily anticipate becoming quite the central axis of the national debate. i wonder if someone comes up to you and says i've heard about it, i've heard about the 1619 project, what is it? what is your summary to someone who may? what is the project? what does it mean? >> thank you for having me on. your absolutely right. i couldn't have predicted any of this. what the 1619 project does is the year 1619's the year that the first africans were sold into the colony of virginia. that marks the beginning of american slavery. what we argue in the project, which commemorated the 400th anniversary of that moment, was that slavery is so foundational to the united states that its legacy can be

but in an interview with the new york times back in july, he hinted at a presidential run to restore unity to libya. so if alice, i'm good off, he is mom a good off. he's a 2nd son, educated in london and vienna. many libyans and people in the west saw him as a reformer, you advocated for democracy. then in 2011 public opinion changed as he took part in the crackdown by his father's regime. he was captured by 5 as soon afterwards, but eventually released 6 years later, safe al islam good. elsie is still wanted though, by the international criminal court for alleged crimes against humanity during the 2011 revolution. human rights watch says, libby and authorities must arrest him and hand him over despite him registering as the presidential candidate out of here is liberty correspondent, malik. trina has moved after years of hiding and out of public view, safely slammed the good duffy immersed in the city of sub how to apply for president. now he was wearing the traditional outfit of southern libya in that brown color. much like much like his father was wearing in his famous speech in