through the new york times. the reporting indicates that her kirtzman didn't know what the documents were, necessarily and did not know what the classified documents were or if they were classified documents there. but he did specify to donald trump, if there are classified documents. so, it seems indicate that even according to judge cannon's order but what the fbi can and cannot do. even according to her order. the fbi could question eric parchment tomorrow, about what he told donald trump. >> yes, absolutely. judge cannon revised ruling. but the one she issued after the government tried to get her to reverse reconsider her regional they'd give them that wiggle room, as far as i'm concerned. they have debility to speak their intent. tonight, tomorrow, whatever they want. get some more details some they don't go into the deep substance of those are the classified records that were seized. but to follow up a bit when andrew's point. this is painting the picture that the government almost certainly utilize in the

— york times saying? i mean, these ictures, york times saying? i mean, these pictures, they make you stop and| pictures, they make you stop and look, don't they? they are obviously very different to a lot of papers that we've got over here in the uk at the moment, and i think itjust goes to show that despite us remembering the monarch and her 70 years of fantastic service, that there are real issues happening right now in the world beyond this. and once this week of national mourning comes to an end, i think it will be very interesting to see what our new pm will be doing about this. it does remind us, doesn't it, that we almost feel like we have been in a bit of news vacuum when it comes to other stories because certainly before the news broke last thursday that there were concerns about the queen's health, coverage of pakistan was much more prominent, suddenly here. so, it is interesting to get his perspective from the new york times, which of course is talking about the royal family, the headline is princess and's growing influence and workloa

stopped in the blood, was those work and it's sprayed everywhere which may explain why the new york times . incidentally, winnings podcast, 2018. california was such as the central character who went by the elliot abu, who told the times he wasn't islamic states soldier and furnished the paper with tales of violence. and barbara had multiple times put him on the cross to leave the dagger in his heart. the podcast was downloaded millions of time, but the story turned out to be a hoax. abu safe was real name is, sharon shouted. he is a fraud. a scientist who sold a fictional tale 2 times reporter, meaning color market one she would eventually, when a peabody award for the paper was forced to admit it got it wrong. blaming and institutional failure. 16 years after acknowledging the failings in its post 9 coverage. promising to be more rigorous, the new york times had done it again. but the pub county remains online. with this screen, the time has concluded that the episodes of cow feet that presented town to his claims did not meet our standards for accuracy. and the times stood by telemachu

what is fascinating is that the "new york times" stopped acknowledging it. s not a single mention of the 9-11 anniversary on the front page of yesterday's paper. the paper that purports to represent new york the epicenter of the 9-11 attack. why would the "new york times" ignore 9-11? a good question. because the "new york times" and the tiny leadership class it represents now endorses the nationwide crackdown on civil rights that 9-11 made possible. they benefit from it. it's how they keep power. so 9-11 was less a trag than an opportunities. if you don't believe that watch how joe biden commemorated that anniversary yesterday -- >> it's not enough to gather and remember september 11th. those we lost more than 2 decades ago. on this day it's not about the past; it's about the future. we have an obligation. a duty and a responsibility to defend, preserve and protect our democracy. >> tucker: it's not about the past. it's about the future. this was in a speech supposed to mark the anniversary of the deaths of thousands of americans at the hands of foreign adve

and then made the sunday edition of the new york times and my sales went up three times. and then, the week after it appeared in the new york times sunday edition to show you how crazy the new york times is, i became an editor of choice. so, the editors of the new york times repudiated their owner of your. it just goes to show you, if any of you out here are familiar with fair haven i am probably the reject from fair haven. why>> i am not sure where to go with a question after that but what i would ask is, why is writing about richard nixon's still so controversial? >> there are several reasons, the main reason is one of the reviews that i received, which was a nice review. it was not bad. it said i cannot see it, nixon was so bad and kennedy was so good. there is no way that this book that was written as well as it was written, and the arguments that are made are so reasonable. it just cannot be. and, one of the reviews i got from a syndicate in canada was, this is an important book and you ought to read it, but 60 years they have gotten it wrong, gellman it is swimming

jason , thank you.k you. >> thank you so "new york times" is lying again. gaihat's not a news story, but it's interestingn. how subtle the lies are in this case. ho the times manipulating its best seller list to pretend that people usually they don't agree with aren't selling more books than anybody else. who . but they are. it turns out we have the number . listen to me for real. this is your last chance to win seven grand a week for life from publishers clearing house cover. thirty first, thank you. dinner and pch .com harim seven grand a week for life. ever wonder how much your neighbor's house is worth? go to owner .com to search home value estimates and compare your home. could be worth more than you think, especially in today's inflated market. visit odali .com before it's too late. if you spent time on base at camp lejeune prior to 1980, and developed any of these cancers or suffered any of these injuries, you may be eligible for significant financial compensation leaking underground tanks contaminated the drinking water with benzene and other highly

i left the new york times about six months ago, and i loved the new york times. i had 16 great years there. and before that, nine great years of the washington post. and they i mean, i loved working for great newspapers, institutional. it was a very, you know, heady and weighty and actually kind of pressure filled activity and place to work. but i also feel like i'm a new stage of my career where i am now writing about freely. but i do feel it's at a moment where the stakes higher and i am i am sort of using a new voice. and i think that try out a lot of this here. you know, unfortunately was was, you know, execute it during difficult times and also during the pandemic. and it was cold and i was between jobs and i was probably not a lot of fun to be around as my family can attest to there's a my wife shaking her in the back but again having said all that i do think it's a fun book. i hope you'll read it. i also hope you'll ask questions because i as a print reporter, much more enjoy interactive formats and sort of being able to hone in on what people are actually

>> i think the new york times does incredible journalism. really, really important work. he stuff they have done in ukraine, huge stories that they've broken in the opioid crisis, all of it is great stuff. the times is by far, i picked the times and facebook because they are by far the most influential parts of their respective elements. facebook is by far the most important social media company. the new york times is by far the most important, the most influential traditional media organization. they are more influential than they have ever been because there's so much less competition than there was. they have a podcast, tv shows, the whole thing. i think the criticism in the new york times and the larger traditional media is really that this is not a both sides issue. democracy is at stake here. we cannot have a political conversation while we treat democrats on kitchen table issues, the same as republicans trying to steal elections. i think the press is not an unbiased entity, they have biases, they have things that they advocate for. we know the press cares passionate

the "new york times" said you killed people. >> there were no covid deaths. people caught covid. ut weekly videos to my employees. enjoy this time with your family and relax. if you get covid or anybody you care about gets covid, make me your first call. we will get you taken care of. if you need toilet paper, you will get you that. if you need food or need anything call us and we will take care of you. through covid me and my team became stronger than we have ever been. once it it was time to get back to it work -- there are companies not back to work yet. my whole team is back to work 4 weeks into the pandemic and worked straight through. >> tucker: did you lose anyone? >> we didn't lose anyone. >> tucker: you were loyal to your employees and never had staff problems? >> my employees were loyal to me for the last 20 years. when the [bleep] hit the fan i was loyal to my people. they were loyal back. we got through this thing. we threw one hell of a christmas party last year and brought kidd rock in and played for everybody. it's like it never happened here. >> tucker: you are sho

of -- the new york times is reporting tonight that former white house counsel warned donald trump last year when he was no longer president that mr. trump could face legal wired billet if he did not return government materials he had taken with him when he left office. the lawyer sought to impress upon mr. trump pull the seriousness of the issue potential for investigations and legal exposure if he did not retain the documents. in january, not long after the discussion with mr. herschmann, mr. trump turned over to the national archive 15 boxes of material. this is -- and so now, we know the name of one witness, possibly the most important witness. federal prosecutors were called to testify in their grand jury investigation of donald trump. eric herschmann. i will obviously comply with a subpoena and that case. i'll tell whatever you told donald trump about those documents. here is eric the thing the duty le pen -- >> the day after eastman, i don't member why he called me but he started to le pen -- it's something to deal with georgia, i said to him or you out of your mind? >> i only wa

i'm reading from "the new york times" here. he was doing it with giuliani who of course has been facing multiple legal problems. the subpoena to seek information about the plan to submit. quote, slates of electors pledged to mr. trump from swing states that were won by joe biden in the 2020 election. maya, i appreciate "the new york times"' clinical reference. another way to say it is massive elector fraud trying to steal the votes of the people in those state who is voted for biden. however you put it, what does it tell you that individuals like mr. carrick are now under this heat newly reported tonight? >> well, the primary thing it tells me is don't do the crime if you can't do the time. in other words, if in fact there are law violations that -- and you are part of it, you are going to get caught up in it. and i want the go back to something emily said that was so important in terms of the players, right, and giuliani holding himself as an attorney for donald trump. but also jack willencheck, the attorney in arizona and pho

mentioned that, the d.n.a. >> they got it all. >> bill: wow, geraldo, thank you. >> dana: "new york timesmaking them livid. the word -- is the publisher keeping up with the times or chasing trends? jimmy failla has thoughts and a light blue jacket. ♪♪ businesses have to find new ways to compete in order to thrive in an ever-changing market. the right relationship with a bank who understands your industry, as well as the local markets where you do business, can help lay a solid foundation for the future. pnc provides the resources of one of the nation's largest banks and local leaders with a focus on customized insights to help your business achieve its goals. that's how we make a difference. ♪ >> tech: when you have auto glass damage... choose safelite. we can come to you and replace your windshield. >> grandkid: here you go! >> tech: wow, thank you! >> customer and grandkids: bye! >> tech: bye! don't wait, schedule now. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ people with plaque psoriasis, are rethinking the choices they make. like the shot they take. the memories they create.

the "new york times" calls the maga movement anti-american. the "new york times" has not defended something anti-american. and they are saying there is proof of it everywhere you look. trump is leading an assault on the institutions of american self-government and that assault implicates much of the republican party. the american left has been leading an assault on our institutions for decades. this party is hell bent on packing the court. scrapping the electoral college defunding the police, blirk ice. banning free speech online ripping away your second amendment. nuking the filibuster. the democratic party burned down cities. the summer of 2020 was much deadlier than january 6th. they tried to assassinate a supreme court justice. they are tearing down statues of thomas jefferson and renaming schools named after abe lincoln. what is this really about? it's about questioning the legitimacy of an election. that's what the whole thing is about. if questioning an election makes you a terrorist than the democratic party should be on the fbi's most

york. they moved to new jersey about the time i was born. project veritas is located in the suburbs of new york city. about 45 north of new york city. we have headquarters there. we have a few dozen journalist running the country undercover. >> what was your life like from zero to 18. >> i wrote about that my first book breakthrough. my father and grandfather were in construction and property maintenance. i helped them up until my teenage years. and then i write about some of that story. and the story of resilience in my life. i did not really everything is gonna be a journalist. i did enjoy -- i watch local news in new york. nbc four, abc seven. i read the new york times every day. 18 years old. 19 years old. i read the usa today. i just read newspapers every day for a year or two. mike was one said this. he said it best. i found things were not as they seemed. rarely as they should be. i did not know what to do with the sentiment. i did not know what it meant to me. was i going to be an actor? was i going to work and finance? was i going to

"new york times" is trying to wrap this around and make it seem we have a concern, but this is the answerwhen real answer is political thought and social thought think about what affects you and act on that. >> todd: do you think we will see exodus of blacks to the republican party like we've seen latinos this year? it is pretty hot and heavy how quickly latinos have come to the gop. >> david: well, it began some time ago, it is happening. when you look at middle class blacks living out of urban environment in the suburbs, we've talked about that before, when you look at inner-city genderification, growth and wealth and while there are poor blacks in some areas in america and blue cities especially, there are a lot of blacks in the american model, working whether in warehouse or corporate office, anywhere innen 22, so this is a natural diversity that already existed and continues to grow in america and that is what democrats are concerned about, people start thinking for themselves and don't think color of skin and party affiliation. >> todd: thank you issue great to chat with you. listen

if you are saying you want to destroy the washington post and the new york times didn't screw you. i am not changing my journalism to try to appease you, someone who is not interested in a public square and not interested in fact-based journalism. we spent so much time in our industry trying to appease lunatics and stead of just telling the truth. >> i will come back in a second. >> the insanity of social media is that you are attacked constantly by people who don't know what they are attacking you about. >> have you read the article? >> that should be the standard response. those people are not media critics, they are basically people looking for reasons to vent and they are finding it every day. i think what we can and should do is become more transparent about what we do. you asked how you engender trust and i think there has been too much in my career as a journalist -- too much has been shrouded in secrecy. it has been -- it has been done in a dark, back room. i think we need to be more transparent about how we do what we do, what resources are, where information comes from and

the business investigations editor at the new york times. congratulations on the book. author of the new book servants of the . we will be right back. i wish that shaq was my real life big brother. turns out, some wishes do come true. they'll never know. and it turns out the general is a quality insurance company that's been saving people money for nearly 60 years. for a great low rate, and nearly 60 years of quality coverage- go with the general. - common percy! - yeah let's go! on a trip. book with priceline. you save more, so you can “woooo” more. - wooo. - wooo. wooooo!!!!! woohooooo!!!! w-o-o-o-o-o... yeah, feel the savings. priceline. every trip is a big deal. ♪ ♪ away suitcases come in many colors. so you can find your color. colors. choices. happiness. away. ♪ ♪ every search you make, every click you take, every move you make, every step you take, i'll be watching you. the internet doesn't have to be duckduckgo is a free all in one privacy app with a built in search engine, web browser, one click data clearing and more stop companies like google from watching yo

first, let's start with the news reported by the new york times., this has been an incremental and moving story, we now have the best sense of the scope here david. 40 subpoenas, to cell phone's taken from individuals close to trump, or mike roman. subpoena being served to bernie kerik. this seems bigger than just a focus on the super back. this seems like a big case that the federal government is making. what do you make of it? >> i think they are systematically collecting evidence. they are being aggressive as they can be. and i think they are pressuring these various trump associates to become cooperating witnesses. we see that in all of these different investigations, you know, the subpoenas that they want to come, turn over records, maybe they want some of them to testify before grand jury. you mentioned the case of christina bob, who signed that letter, saying there were no classified documents at mar-a-lago. she is now in legal jeopardy, and i think investigators in that case are eager to get her under oath, because she is a choice. she sort

host: the story that we show you and the viewers from "the new york times," it was because the president had read recently a different story from "the new york times" finding that there were minority communities in the south where there was literally sewage in their backyard. sewage backing up into their bathtubs. guest: well, that's right. as i said in jackson, the biggest problem financially is there sewage system. we are not even talking about that here. basically the water has just stopped quant -- stopped coming out of their taps in the quantity that they need. they cannot even get quality. but now the water is stopping and there is not enough water coming out of their taps to even flush toilets and the bigger problem in the midst of all of that is sewage. host: mark edwards, thank you very much for your time this morning. the [bell

today 11 weeks on "the new york times" best seller list.nks for the support. >> sean: have a great show, my friend. >> pete: thank you, brother. i appreciate it. i am pete hegseth and for lauren graham and this is a special edition of "the ingraham angle." have we seen this story before? russia collusion, ukrainian phone call, alleged hush money payments to stormy daniels. never-trumpers always think they have the former president right where they want him. the aftermath of the mar-a-lago raid, it has been no different. >> let's about trumpers reaction which has been which is to throw any criticism back in the face of the doj. do you get the sense he feels like the walls are closing in? >> i think he is very worried. i don't think he'll admit it. i think for the first time things are really -- i'm going to say the walls are closing in. >> pete: yes, the oft repeated, never realized walls that are closing in. like the knives are out. it isn't just the resistance folks playing into this. but also biden's doj. in last night's close to midnight

"new york times" describes ukraine's gains like this.he weekend in the northeast, an area used by russia as a stronghold, has muted the gung ho bluster of kremlin cheerleaders. it has also undermined arguments in places like germany that providing more and better arms to ukraine would only lead to a long and bloody stalemate against a russian military destined to win." russia in retaliation has attacked infrastructure facilities in the kharkiv region, cutting off power and water to thousands of people there. but the ukrainian people are undeterred and at least today they remain determined in their fight. in a powerful message to the russians posted on facebook last night, president zelenskyy writes this. "don't you understand who we are? what we are for? what we are talking about? read it on our lips. without gas and without you. without you. without or without the light. without you. without water or without you? without you. without food or without you? we choose without you. cold, hunger, darkness and thirst. for us are not as scary o

last 20 years has been reviewed quite favorably in major american publications, including the new york times the yellow times the new yorker, the new york review of books. stephen king doesn't need the nobel prize for literature for his fame. he already has it, and with an estimated fortune of around $370000000.00, he is one of the richest writers in the world. hard to imagine. but there are fans who have read every stephen king book available will stick with the most famous kerry with stephen king's 1st novel in 1974. when he was still a teacher and living in a trailer with his wife kerry as the story of a young girl who has telekinetic abilities, as she uses against all her classmates so bullied her for years and against her religious fanatic mother who wants to kill carrie it's a slaughter of a book. the book, like almost all his stories, was made into a movie and made stephen king famous. i held new to the suit number, the shining, came out in 1977, a horror novel that gained a cult. following 3 years later in the film, adaptation by stanley kubrick, the story of jack a dry, alcoholic. l

i am very happy that there are twelve hundred people working in the new york times news new york times news room. but you don't want. a situation where too elite news organizations or three or five are the gatekeepers for what news gets gone after and what news you should see and as an illustration of that i wanted to show you what happened on- halloween and twenty six and- which of. today when your time is published a story on the left. in mother jones published a story on the right. and had that that to me is a real illustration of how you want many different voices and many different perspectives. and the great news is those are starting to happen. that collage look you know mother jones is just of one of the tiles over there on the right there are now more than two hundred nonprofit news organizations all over the country i'm sure there's one where you live there are ones you know focusing on particular issues there are ones focused on particular community there are ones have to. is there when. the there are in total of two thousand people now working in nonprofit newsrooms all ove

then there is this tanned liesing end to "the new york times" story.ny has been delayed. i think that's the most likely that we're in the realm of speculation. >> how do you like the privilege claims on this? >> i think it's pretty clear that they'd be dead in the water in the d.c. circuit. there is a d.c. circuit court of appeals decision that is so squarely on point and it says can you not assert executive privilege when you have a grand jury calling for your testimony. in fact, in that case, it was an incumbent deputy white house counsel. more so there would have been interests on the side of executive privilege for the incumbent white house counsel. here we have a former white house lawyer and the incumbent president has waived executive privilege for the january 6 inquiry. of so it's really remarkable. it's almost like they're setting themselves up for another embarrassing loss that this is what they're trying to do. >> we know from the january 6 committee hearings that eric hershman has a lot of inside information around the plotting of january 6

and minnesota on the other side, we hear phrase anti-democratic a lot from the writers at "new york times other side of 525 electoral votes, you might be anti-d democratic, i'll safe you the mystery, times will endorse democrat cond candidate for president from now until the end of time and continue to not care. turning to what we care about, have you noticed that people notice when you do actions of kindness. kindness, answer is yes. people remember and for much longer than you might think. some cases, a seemingly small act of kindness was remembered for decades. so the gest is, there are no small actions of kindness, not to the recipient at least. if you are at store, someone is putting things back because of money is short, help them out. their recollection of your kindness will last longer than that money you spent. if you are not sure whether to offer someone get a stroller off of plane while they are holding their children do, it. it is kind. it leaves a memory. if you are in drive-thru, have a little change left over, apply it to the person in the car behind you, if you want to be

this is what "the new york times" is reporting mr. berman writes., mr. berman writes he hoped the verdict would ease the pressure on the southern district to prosecute another enemy of the president. mr. john kerry. "that was naive on my part, mr. berman writes. mr. kerry, a former veteran and massachusetts senator was secretary of state under president obama, a role in which he led the lengthy negotiations that produced the iran nuclear code, the administration's signature foreign policy achievement. trump, during his presidential campaign, called the deal insane and a disaster. on may 7, 2018, trump tweeted about mr. kerry's, quote, possibly illegal shadow diplomacy, an apparent reference to mr. kerry having conversations as a private citizen with iranian and other officials. trump tweeted another attack on mr. kerry the next day, the same day trump announced the united states was withdrawing from the accord. an justice department officials told his office he would be responsible for investigating mr. kerry's iran-related conduct. the fbi would jo

meanwhile the "new york times" dealing with serious problems.loyees signed a little pledge because that's what they like to do, refusing to return to the office. they say they want to be paid more and they say their wages aren't keeping up with inflation and the cost of gas. because they have a commute. i wonder why that happened? we know what's really going on. they have realize they have to go back to the office with this guy and said on second thought i'll stay home. but in all seriousness, this is what happens when you let the inmates run the asylum. if it's up to them these people are never going back to the office. they like being home alone they are shy, they are sheltered. they like to submit to government rule. so, what do new yorkers think about all of this? well, we sent a producer out. listen. >> working from home is better because you are your own boss, sleep, eat whenever you want. take a break. >> i think everyone should have a decision on when they should be in and when they shouldn't. we are all adults here. >> the "new york tim

presidente joe biden ha admitido a mÁs de 1 millÓn de migrantes para que soliciten asilo, segÚn el new york timesemos cÓmo a muchos les espera una pesadilla burocrÁtica de aÑos. ilia: muy buenas tardes y bienvenidos al noticiero univisiÓn, cientos de estudiantes regresaron a las aulas hoy en uvalde, texas casi tres meses despuÉs de la peor tragedia escolar en los estados unidos. jorge: algunos estudiantes decidieron no regresar a las aulas. ilia: y las autoridades intentan convencer a los padres y estudiantes que la violencia quedÓ atrÁs. nidia: llegÓ el primer dÍa de clases en uvalde, texas y se formaron las filas de padres para dejar a sus tiros y todo en presencia de 33 agentes que ahora patrullan las escuelas. se instalaron cercas de ocho pies que rodean las primarias para proteger a los estudiantes, esto es parte del sistema de seguridad que prometieron. y aÚn con los ajustes de seguridad, el miedo persiste para marcela y su hija que fueron testigos del tiroteo siendo estudiante en la primera robb. luego la despedÍ, le dio un abrazo y le di un beso y le dije que la quiero mucho. nidia: se en

last 20 years has been reviewed quite favorably in major american publications, including the new york times, the yellow times the new yorker, the new york review of books. stephen king doesn't need another prize for literature for his fame. he already has it, and with an estimated fortune of around $370000000.00, he is one of the richest writers in the world. hard to imagine. but there are fans who have read every stephen king book available will stick with the most famous kerry with stephen king's 1st novel in 1974. when he was still a teacher and living in a trailer with his wife carry is the story of a young girl who has telekinetic abilities, as she uses against all her classmates, have bullied her for years. and against her religious fanatic mother who wants to kill carrie. it's a slaughter of a book. the book, like almost all his stories, was made into a movie and made stephen king famous. i knew to the sooner done the shining, came out in 1977, a horror novel that gained a cult. following 3 years later in the film, adaptation by stanley kubrick, the story of jack a dry, alcoholic. li

there's this kind of tantalizing into the new york times story, which is that his testimony has beenat's the most likely, that we are in the realm of speculation. >> and how do you like the privilege claims on this? >> i think it is pretty clear that they would be dead in the water in the d. c. circuit. there is the d. c. circuit court of appeals decision that is so squarely on point. and it says, you cannot best assert executive privilege when you have a grand jury testimony calling for you -- in that case, it was an incumbent deputy white house counsel. so, even more so, there would have been interests on the side of the executive privilege for the incumbent deputy white house counsel. here we have a former white house lawyer, an incumbent president, we're -- waved executive privilege for the january 6th inquiry. so, it is really remarkable. it's almost like they are setting themselves up for another embarrassing loss, that this is what they are trying to do. >> is it delay? we know from the january 6th committee hearing that eric herschmann has a lot of insider information regardi

. >> the legislation had bipartisan support and the media most recently "the new york times" was a violationhould there be greater penalties that if you do put forward with a violation. >> i'm not big on "the new york times" in the investigation. but here is the thing. members had been working just because somebody introduces a bill it doesn't mean it becomes the law of the land. there has been discussion about it and just recently this morning the committee has been going back-and-forth refining things and talking to members what they think will work. and we believe we have a product we can bring to the floor this month. >> when the bill comes out you will see what it is and those are the discussions to go back and forth. but that's only a quarter of what we need to pass a bill regardless how bipartisan it is but the committee of jurisdiction has the administration committee with the ethics committee and next call legislating. it is women's day. >> and at this point the president and first lady are the only one so do you expect that to change if they are not able?e >> with those members who

the new york times gives no specific numbers for those charged. a claims cases may be as high as 8 and a half 1000 back in 2020 berlin approved amendments to germany's social media law. ain't a curbing far right expression on the internet. the legislation requires all online companies with over $2000000.00 users to take half each and in full authority for prosecution. but the new time says that the algorithm used to take such unlawful content remains unclear. some social media giants have slammed the amendments saying they undermine of fundamental rights. and the seo, a german court ruled against the hate speech law saying it violates european union legislation on civil liberties. german opposition leader ralph nemaia claims. the government actively uses the law for political prosecutions. there is no crack down on any type of sentiment that people may express either by online debates. and the social networks, of course, was always to leave expressing races or singapore or anti semitic points of view in germany. all along, but what they want to do

new york times reports just a few dozen people showed, up who were about half campaigned on tiers.t's least robin saying quote, he is being heavily outspent by his democratic rival, has had no television ads on the air since may, has chosen not to interact with the states news media in ways that would push the agenda, and trails by double digit in reputation -- in arizona, things are going quite a bit more smoothly for carrie lake in her race for governor. she is playing the part of unelectable politician, more convincingly than mastriano. in part because of the trained, tv professional as a former news anchor. just look at how she recently masked her extreme stance on or borscht, which he previously called the ultimate. in >> the supreme court some -- simply set the abortion issue back to the states. we're gonna follow the law on the books. if people don't like the laws on the books they need to elect representatives who will change the laws. i'm running for governor, not for god. so i don't get to write the laws. and i think you know that. but i will -- >> that's -- as someone ru