unnecessary from my point of view, because the material is so deeply considered in the article zabrodskyi zaluzhny, and now zaluzhny, so intelligently, so competently laid out... the analysis of the situation and the perspective of its consideration, i will give you only one example: the article of 2022 was being completed one point about the fact that the best development of the situation is the occupation of ukraine during the campaign of the 23rd year, the key bridgehead crimea, for this the article wrote out the necessary: ​​and when you look at this list of necessary, you will understand, so who is in this situation nakosiach, well, a little tip, since march there has been talk about a million ammunitions from the european union, ugh, through whom i can put a lot, in particular, at the end of the article itself, it was printed... there was a photo of atakams on ukrinform, now i move to the present the articles signed by zaluzhnyi, that's for sure, there are the results of the campaigns of the 23rd year , there is variability, what can be further, and what can happen if the current co

everyone who will hear us now, please take the article signed by general zaluzhnyi and general zabrodskyi. dated september 9, 2022, these two articles are an analysis, a serious and in-depth analysis, in the first case of the results of the 2022 war campaign and the plans for the 23rd year, where everything was explained in great detail, what concerns the current article is the summary of 2023 and the plan: for 2024, if you compare these articles, it becomes clear that the conversation about who is more to blame in this situation is completely meaningless, and i i will not explain all of this now, because at the level of my emotions in relation to the conversation, shuster is now lazy, this fact, he, he is absolutely, well, not needed from my point of view, because the material was considered in depth in the article of zabrodskyi zaluzhny and now zaluzhny , the analysis of the situation and the perspective of its consideration is so intelligently and competently presented, i will give you only one example, the article of 2022 ended with one point, that the best development of the situatio

the epicenter of today's attention should be on the comparison of the article of the brave zabrodskyi a year ago and the current article and understanding what may be in force, and here anand, i i cannot find the words to describe the actions in the congress of the united states of america, in the information space of ukraine, in the current ukrainian officials, because for me this is the pose: we had lunch, in conditions when the nation is at war, this, this should not be about us, this first and second, if congress demands a report for 106 billion, which means it must be submitted, of which 2/3 never came to ukraine, these reports. including those who received these funds should be damned, because i will say once again, of those 106 billion, 2/3 have nothing to do with ukraine, they never come here, and who received roman petrovych, and in general, why so much a strange discussion is currently taking place in the american congress, well, trump is not the only one, here we come to a key story, how do you think the situation with aid will actually develop, so we understand that until

actually, going back to the first article, zaluzhnyi and zabrodskyi, who clearly wrote, then and nowrstand that it is a bittersweet one, but the truth is that to simply go to the borders of the 9th year at any cost is not to solve the problem, and that is we talked about it yesterday oleksandr musienko, too, who in principle said, the phrase is probably bitter, but he said that i do not believe that we can simply take a million men, now arm them with small arms and throw them on an assault, we simply will not succeed in doing it like in russia, we can't afford it also because it's simply not possible to do it in our country , it's not working that way, it's definitely not working, and i'll add that the fact that the mobilization is happening today, we're already thinking about what will be in four months, because it is not march and not april of the 22nd year, now the armed forces are equipped in a completely different way, and we have a time lag for the training of personnel, and in fact, what we are doing today is a provision for the spring, for the summer of next year, that what w

well, unnecessary from my point of view, because, as deeply as the material was considered in zabrodskyi’sle, it is alkaline and now for an alkaline, so intelligently , so competently presented analysis of the situation and the perspective of its consideration, i will give you only one example, the article of 2022 ended with one point that the best development of the situation is the occupation of ukraine during the campaign of the 23rd year, the key latsdarm crimea for this article wrote out the necessary, and when you look at this list of the necessary , you will understand, so who in this situation has been cut off, well, a little hint, since march there has been talk about a million ammunition from the european union, huh, through whom i can put... a lot, in particular, at the end of the article itself, it was printed on ukrinform, it was in the photo of atakams, now, i move to the current article under the signature of zaluzhnyi, there is exactly that, there are the results of the campaigns on the 23rd year, there is variability, which can be further, and what can happen if the curren

general zabrodskyi in september 2022, and with the same plot, relatively speaking, the current situatione planned, what we achieved, what advantages, what disadvantages, how these disadvantages should be fought and what strategic future plan i'm not talking about the fact that the very title of the scientific report of general zaluzhnyi, it clearly says that it is not about any deadlock, it is about how to work further to defeat the enemy, you know, i read, i think that reminds me this material, and i remembered, i remembered the book, academician horbulin, as you remember, how to defeat russia in the future war, and here we are actually talking about a positional war, how to win in such a war. and for the current ukraine, these are fundamental things that must be understood, now, actually, and why is it picked up this tonality, which today dominates the mass media, especially the ukrainian ones, because if you take the entire spectrum of the western press, and i will not list them, there is everything, there is everything from the ala genre. simon schuster to academic editions, to such

after the breakthrough in kherson region and kharkiv region, i then read an article by zaluzhny and zabrodskyi by the attention of the majority of society, unfortunately, they said exactly that, that the russians would strengthen, and predicted that the year 2023 will be very difficult, and it was not about coffee in yalta, etc., well, i digress, that is , the defense is complex, the defense is echeloned, the defense is competently built, it must be said about this, but it is not for modern means of fire influence, battle tactics , means defeat, it is not... it is insurmountable, it just takes time , and again, he said about it, the appropriate means and their number, again, this can be read in this analysis of the merits, that is, at the moment, the war is not just online and not just it is necessary to see, and it is possible to read specialists in order to understand what is happening, mr. valery, and so on to the conclusion simply, if you now imagine what beats at our disposal, at your disposal, more precisely, they would be the same f6 16 and much larger the number of missiles of the eart

balanced, realistic assessments, realistic, yes, i i remember this article written together with zabrodskyiwhere zaluzhny directly said that even going to the borders in 1991 would not mean automatic victory. of ukraine and this happened at the same time when the concept of zelenskyi’s 10 points of peace was being formed, should these things be more coordinated, the vision of the military and the desire of politicians, how is it, how is it to be harmonized, because if you believe, again, time articles, then it gets to the point that the military refuses to comply. orders coming from the president's office explaining that they don't have, for example, the ability to liberate this or that city, and we know that there are such orders, if only because there was an announcement from volodymyr zelensky in washington that three cities would be liberated by the end of the year, the fact is that the military does not have the right to carry out the orders of no one except their commanders, and therefore the office... do not have any mechanism of the right to manage the military, that is, even if suc

those who should be replaced , they are not irreplaceable, they must be replaced, but what general zabrodskyineral zaluzhnyi wrote about in the 22nd year, and now what general zaluzhnyi wrote, it must be implemented, hence, it is very important, first, despite the fact that that we are all in conditions of extreme tension, to gain wisdom, including, especially in international relations, because now, i think to myself, well, arrange this concert with relations with the congress. and type in the mouth in what is happening today in slovakia, in hungary, and not able to be formed the answer, well, it looks a little frivolous, and yes, in conclusion, i am convinced that there will be wise people, on one side and on the other, who will answer this question, because what is the danger that the fuer brings to ukraine, europe and the world. it is colossal, it is global, because i want to emphasize it once again, what happened in israel is the work of moscow, tehran and beijing, we should stop thinking that what is developing is some random scholastic events. thank you, dear roman petrovich, for this

it will continue to happen, and it must ... happen, because it's about zaluzhnyi and his deputy zabrodskyill a people's deputy, and now already his deputy in september 22, clearly spoke about the fact that if the hostilities are not transferred to the territory of the enemy, the enemy, well, a terrible asymmetry turns out, because the war is on our territory, the enemy inflicts damage to the entire depth of the military structure and the country, that is, economic life is under threat, regrouping is under threat , certainly not as it could have been, but nevertheless, on the other hand, the enemy leads an economic life, calmly regroups, creates new "unity, it is clear that if it continues like this, then the chances of a primordial will decrease, we must not allow this to happen, so it will continue, and anthony blinken, after he visited kyiv and talked with her american journalist, and she also asked him about that there is cross-border activity, let's make money from it, so he agreed that this is a system of self-defense of ukraine, that is, it is the implementation of the 51st article o