private company, well, you say that. the conclusions of this company are listened to, for example, by the haab court, well, then it means that the boundaries of private companies are still quite blurred, it is difficult to determine why i am asking this, because relatively speaking, we have had this for the 20th year, president zelenskyi talks about the fact that we really need to define private companies, two draft laws are being developed, they are hanging somewhere, zelenskyi says that... well , we need to make sure that they do not become the basis of certain oligarchic forces and so on, where does this threat come from or the caveat to private companies appears if it does not correspond to the essence of the pmcs themselves in view of what you said earlier, this is a very very relevant question that you have raised now, you know, in civilized countries i... i don't want anybody offend, but in civilized countries even there is no such thought that a private military company can be subordinated to some oligarch there and... work in the interests of some private individuals there and, god fo

company, well, put it this way, a journalist listens to the conclusions of this company, for example, the haabrt, well then it means that the limits of private companies all the same, they are quite blurred, it is difficult to determine here why i am asking this, because , linguistically speaking, we had this, the 20th year, president zelenskyy talks about the fact that we really need to define ourselves as private companies, two draft laws are being developed, they... . are hanging around, zelenskyi says that it is necessary to make sure that they do not become the basis of certain oligarchic forces there and so on, so where does this threat or warning to private companies come from, if it does not correspond to the essence of the pmcs themselves, in view of what you said earlier. this is very, very appropriate you understand the question you asked now. in civilized countries, i don't want to offend anyone, but in civilized countries, even such an idea does not arise that a private military company can obey some oligarch and work in the interests of some private individuals there and, god for

a journalistic investigation, the conclusions of this company are listened to, for example, by the haabourt, well, then it means that the boundaries of private companies are still quite blurred, it’s difficult to determine here, why i ask this, because linguistically speaking , we had this, the 20th year, president zelenskyi says that we really need to decide on private companies, two legislative... projects are being developed, they are hanging somewhere, zelenskyi says about what needs to be done so that they do not become the basis of certain oligarchic forces there and so on, where does this threat or warning to private companies come from, if it does not correspond to the essence of the pmcs themselves in view of what you said before. that's, that's a very, very relevant question that you've asked now. uh, you see, uh, in civilized countries, i don't, i don't want to offend anyone, but in civilized countries there is no such thought that a private military company... can obey some oligarch there and work in the interests of some there are private individuals and, god forbid, they t

like a journalist-investigator, the conclusions of this company are listened to, for example, by the haabourt, well then it means that the limits there are still enough private companies blurred, it is difficult to determine why i am asking this, because, linguistically speaking, we had a president this 20th year. says that we really need to define ourselves as private companies, two draft laws are being developed, they are hanging somewhere, zelenskyi says that it is necessary to make sure that they do not become the basis of certain oligarchic forces there and so on, that is where this threat or warning comes from to private companies appears, if it does not correspond to the essence of the pmcs themselves, given what you said earlier. that, that's a very, very pertinent question that you've asked now, you see, in civilized countries, i don't, i don't want to offend anyone, but in civilized countries, even such an idea does not arise that a private military company can obey some oligarch there and work in the interests of some private individuals there and, god forbid, try to remove the

such a journalist-investigative agency listens to the conclusions of this company, for example, the haab court, well then it means that the boundaries of private companies are still... quite blurred, it is difficult to determine why i am asking this, because linguistically speaking, in it was our 20th year, president zelenskyi says that we really need to define private companies, two draft laws are being developed, they are stuck somewhere, zelenskyi says that it is necessary to make sure that they do not become the basis of certain oligarchic forces and such else, where does this threat or warning come from? to private companies appears, if it does not correspond to the essence of the pmcs themselves, given what you said earlier. this, this is a very , very relevant question that you have now asked, you know, in civilized countries, i do not want to offend anyone, but in civilized countries there is no such idea that a private military company can be subordinated to some oligarch there. and work in the interests of some private individuals there and, god forbid, try to eliminate the gov

if you say something like investigative journalism, this company is listened to, for example, by the haab court, well then it means that the boundaries of private companies are still quite blurred, it is difficult to determine why i am asking this, because linguistically speaking, we had this... 20 for the first year, president zelenskyi has been talking about the fact that we really need to decide on private companies, two draft laws are being developed , they are hanging somewhere, zelenskyi is saying that it is necessary to make sure that they do not become the basis of certain oligarchic forces there and so on. where does this threat or warning come from of private companies appears, if it does not correspond to the essence of the pmcs themselves. considering what you said earlier. this, this is a very , very relevant question that you have now asked , you know, in civilized countries, i do not want to offend anyone, but in civilized countries there is no such idea that a private military company can be subordinate to some oligarch there, and work in the interests of some private indi

journalist. to the conclusions, to the conclusions of this company is listened to, for example, the haab court, well then it means that the boundaries of private companies are still quite blurred, it is difficult to determine why i am asking this, because relatively speaking, we had this somewhere in the 20th year, president zelenskyy says that we we really need to define private companies, two draft laws are being developed, they are hanging somewhere, zelenskyi says that it is necessary... to make sure that they do not become the basis of certain oligarchic forces and so on, where does this threat or warning to private companies come from appears if it is not corresponds to the essence of the pmcs themselves, looking at what you said earlier, this is a very, very relevant question that you have now asked, you see, in civilized countries i do not... to offend anyone, but in civilized countries there is not even such an idea that a private military company can be subordinated to some oligarch there, and work in the interests of some private individuals there and, god forbid , try to remo