a metamorphosis, well, look, i want to make a few caveats first, first, the survey was conducted by kmis, as sociologists, yes, so i think it would be appropriate for you to invite them to talk exactly as sociologists, how they interpret this data, i will interpret. these data as a political scientist, and i i want to say that, in principle, the kmis survey , well, it does not exist, it does not fall out of those surveys that we, the democratic initiatives foundation, and the sociological service, the sociological service of the center, the center are reasonable, except that they have just inserted these ratings of trust in the diligent sirsky, that is, they have completed. survey on february 10, 10, that is, another 300 respondents, are they from or 350 respondents, they answered already knowing that the resignation had taken place, if we talk about this traditional question, in which direction are the development of affairs in ukraine, well, now i recall our data that, let's say, before the start of full-scale aggression, there were only 20% of such people in ukraine, that is, 20% befo

will interpret this data as a political scientist, and i want to say that in the principles of the kmisell, it is not, it does not fall out of those surveys that we, the democrats foundation, also conducted. initiatives and the sociological service, the sociological service of the center, the center of intelligence, unless i mention that they have just inserted these ratings of trust in the zaluzhny syrian, that is, they completed the survey on february 10, 10, that is, another 300 respondents, they are from 450 respondents, they answered already knowing that the resignation took place, if... talk about this traditional question, in which direction things are developing in ukraine, well, now i recall our data , let's say, before the start of full-scale aggression, there were only 20% of such people in ukraine, that is, 20% before the great war believed that things were going in the right direction, then suddenly immediately with the beginning of... russian aggression , the ukrainians changed their opinion diametrically oppositely, and it jumped up to how much you are doing here , 68% gi

is, he could emphasize that here... there is no politics, there is only military affairs, but today kmis published the ratings and as of february 24, valery zaluzhny is trusted by 94% of surveyed ukrainians, in december it was 92%, in second place is general budanov with 66%, and earlier it was 60%. the general is also in fifth place. 40%, in third place president zelensky, you, as a person who participated in many election campaigns, both presidential and parliamentary, what do you say about this trust, which sociologists are now talking about and which ukrainians demonstrate, does this mean that we have, well at least there is one who is the leader. of people's trust, it is a worthy 94%, and this is a sufficiently high result, and he has no other way out, how to actually become president and lead ukraine? well, you and i witnessed the rise of many candidates when forecasts were given, but my god, here is monakivskyi a year ago, the detainee had a presidential rating of 70 or so percent. we had a high rating in ut hybka, lutsenko, and klitschko, at different times they were the leaders

actually, why do we ask tv viewers and our experts about trust, because kmis conducted a survey and foundating and trust in single news continues to fall, according to the results of a social survey of the kyiv international institute of sociology as of february 24 only. 36% of respondents trust the information from the telethon. it is worth noting that in may 22nd of the year, the trust in the united news was 69%, in december of the 23rd year - 43% . about trust or not trust, and sociologists also measure the rating of trust in news and in... the way a single telethon works, it is obvious, obviously, changes must take place, here you can agree with maxim the smart, what needs to be worked on, and if he there is this telethon, which means that it somehow needs to be made available to all political forces, and all political forces, including those who must comment on the events taking place in the state, and after all, since we are on the air of the espresso tv channel, the tv channel espresso, and the fifth... and straight have after all, to return to t2, where we were simply illegally ki

why do we ask tv viewers and our experts about trust, because kmis conducted a survey and found out thatnews, rating and trust in single news continues to fall, according to the results of a social survey of the kyiv international institute of sociology, as of february 24 only 36% of respondents trust the information from the telethon. it is worth noting. that in may 22nd the trust in the united news was 69%, in december 23rd 43%, i mean that it is not the editors of espresso who invented the poll about trust or lack of trust, but sociologists also measure the rating of trust in news and before a single telethon works, it is obvious that it must take place with... here you can agree with maksym rozumny that work needs to be done, and if there is already this telethon, it means that it must somehow be made available to all political forces, and all political forces in that among others, we must comment on the events taking place in the state, and in the end, since we are on the air of the espresso tv channel, the espresso tv channel and the 5th and direct channel must still return to t2,

that is, he could emphasize that there is no politics here, there are only military affairs, but today kmis ratings, and as of february 24, valery zaluzhny is trusted by 94% of surveyed ukrainians, in december it was 92, in second place was general budanov with 66%, and earlier was 60%, in fifth place was also general syrskyi with 40%, in third place was president zelenskyi, you are a person who participated in many elections. both presidential and parliamentary , what do you say about this trust, which sociologists are talking about now and which ukrainians are demonstrating, does this mean that we have, well, at least one of those who is the leader of the people's trust, that is a diligent 94% , and this is a sufficiently high result, and he has no other choice but to actually run for president. and lead ukraine? oh, well, you and i have witnessed the ups and downs of many candidates, when the forecasts were given, and my goodness, arestovych from monaco had a 70 or so percent presidential rating a year ago. yuta hybka, lutsenko, and klitschko had a high rating in our country. at differen

to look for obvious reasons, and they are, let's look at sociology, which made public this week by kmis beginning of february they conducted this survey, and there is a very revealing moment, as for us, the share of those who believe that things are developing in the right direction continues to decrease in ukraine, and also compared to december 2023 , now in... for the first time there are more people who think that the direction of things is wrong, in december 23rd 54% thought that everything is fine, now the indicator has decreased to 44%, well, these are the numbers, you can see them on the screens now, i am convinced that mr. danilov saw them, that the authorities are watching them, no our task here in the studio is to kind of, you know, drive him into a corner with questions, what he could say, what he wanted to say, he said, the rest, i think our audience is... smart, they understand too, sir shiraskin, what is the reason for this decline in the understanding that things are going well with us? what do you think? first of all, this is a deception, a total deception, a distrust of

small part, even a large part of ukrainians, according to the polls, in particular, according to the kmisery often cites the polls at the end of last year, so at the same time the majority of ukrainians trusted both zaluzhny and zelenskyi, certainly some part will trust both. medals, taking into account the fact that zaluzhnyi left voluntarily in such a mild form, but some of the supporters, especially those, i would say, fans of zaluzhnyi, they will be very critical of zelensky, and this is already noticeable, it was noticeable even before the resignation, and the number of zelensky's critics has already increased, let's see what the public opinion polls will show us in february, i think they will be the same district, usually an omnibus. held in february so after a certain time we will know the data somewhere at the beginning of march, what will be the reaction of public opinion, zelensky will lose from this, of course, i will only note, continuing your thesis, that according to that... studies at the end of december 23 year, if we take zaluzhny and zelensky separately, but zaluzhny was

. >>> and service activity in kmi china growing at a slower rate in january.the stocks falling to a five-year low in january. >>> and as we head to break, here is sharon epperson with the growing impact of the black community in the c-suite. >> there's notable names of black ceos in the fortune 500. including tiaa chief and marvin ellison at lowe's and science application corporation in october. they are among the eight ceos in the fortune 500 who are bloack. that is less than 2% of the list. still, it is a record number. i'm sharon epperson. oh no, a rash. maybe it'll go away. awww, how am i going to find a doctor i'll actually like? is that a qr code? dr. stafford makes you feel at ease. thanks rash! you've got more options than you know. book now. what is cirkul? cirkul is the fuel you need to take flight. cirkul is the energy that gets you to the next level. cirkul is what you hope for when life tosses lemons your way. cirkul, available at walmart and drinkcirkul.com. >>> welcome back. time for the "wex wrap-up." we start with boeing working with the 737 m