stebnitsky, it was his pseudonym leskova, he was liskov stebnitsky, all the attacks were invented by elusive joe, yes, who no one needs anyway, he caused this fire for himself, and after it he actively defended himself and responded positively to tolstoy. about liskov’s later works, they were friends with tolstoy liskov, they even met once in the eighty-seventh year, 8 years before leskov’s death, and liskov himself again according to his testimony, yes, because it is very interesting when you read the works of literary critics , they say, according to the testimony of leskov, tolstoy very much praised so-and-so his text, there is a wonderful basic text, for example, and a hagiographical scripture about early christianity, and i, without hesitation, called marik. she is a great expert in leskovye and so i say: may, tolstoy’s letters have been preserved, in which he praises liskov for this thing, because liskov says that tolstoy praised him in a letter to someone else. he says, i say, this is a letter preserved. maya says: no, there is no such letter, i say, but wouldn’t he have kept

stebnitsky, it was his pseudonym of leskov, he was liskov stebnitsky, all the attacks were invented by the elusive joe, yes, who no one needed anyway, he himself caused this fire and after him. but he himself actively defended himself. tolstoy spoke positively about liskov’s later works. well, they were friends of tolstoy and liskov, they even met once in 1987, 8 years before liskov’s death. and liskov himself, again, according to his testimony, yes, because it’s very interesting when you read the works of literary scholars, they say: according to leskov, tolstoy very much praised so-and-so, his text, there is a beautiful aza, for example, yes, a hagiography about early christianity. without any doubt, i called maya kucherskaya, she is a great expert in leskovye , and so i say: “maya, tolstoy’s letters have been preserved, in which he praises liskov for this thing, because liskov says that tolstoy praised him in a letter to someone else.” he says, i say, this letter has been preserved. maya says: “no, there is no such letter.” i say, but would he really not have preserved tolstoy’s let

stebnitsky’s attacks were invented because no one is interested in him, no one attacked him, and he isself, spoke positively about tolstoy later works. they were friends tolstoy liskov, they even once met in the eighty-seventh year, 8 years before liskov’s death, and liskov himself, again , according to his testimony, because it’s very interesting when you read the works of literary scholars , they say, according to liskov’s testimony, tolstoy very much praised this and that- then his text there is a wonderful basics, for example, and a hagiographical scripture about early christianity, and i doubted nothing and called maria kucherskaya, she is great. specialist in leskovye, and that means i say: may, tolstoy’s letters have been preserved, in which he praises leskov for this thing, because leskov says that tolstoy praised him in a letter to someone else, he says, i say, this letter has been preserved, mine says: no, there is no such letter, i say, but wouldn’t he really have preserved tolstoy’s letter in which he praises him a great genius, that is, i would have kept it, no, probably,