. >> neal katyal, thank you for your analysis. >> you are continuing to read through this opinion as you are just outside the supreme court this morning. i'm curious what's happening there at this moment, and what you think stands out in this decision that we all -- we all should know. >> reporter: it's well, it's pretty quiet outside the court today. not a lot of protesters or onlookers. look. in terms of -- what i find fascinating about this opinion is that for many, many months, serious people entertain the idea that this 14th amendment challenge was plausible, that actually donald trump could be excluded from the ballot, and here you have this resounding 9-0 decision including very liberal justices saying absolutely not. there's no chance yet. this is not how our democracy works. where a state could decide for the nation who could be on the ballot, and, you know, the other thing stepping back, ana, is this is another example among many that are playing out right now of the supreme court playing a huge role in american elections, and it's not necessarily the case that that's a goo