0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
last december, the world's highest court, the international court ofjustice, began considering a case which has stirred debate and controversy around the world. the state of south africa accused the state of israel of violating the genocide convention in gaza. in its initial ruling, the court overwhelmingly found there was a plausible case to answer, but a finaljudgment is likely to take years. today i have an exclusive interview with joan donoghue, thejust—retired president of the icj, who delivered that initial court ruling that sent shock waves around the world. in a sense, the whole idea of international justice is on trial. how will it fare? joan donoghue, welcome to hardtalk. happy to be here. you sat on the international court ofjustice for pretty much 14 years. the last three years as president of the court. one of your last cases was the case brought by south africa against israel on the basis of genocide in gaza. were you aware of the scale of international scrutiny on that particular case? yes, absolutely. it was very clear. and in particular, or, for example, outside of th
last december, the world's highest court, the international court ofjustice, began considering a case which has stirred debate and controversy around the world. the state of south africa accused the state of israel of violating the genocide convention in gaza. in its initial ruling, the court overwhelmingly found there was a plausible case to answer, but a finaljudgment is likely to take years. today i have an exclusive interview with joan donoghue, thejust—retired president of the icj, who...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court. so what do i mean by that? right i mean, so look at sort of some of the big things that have happened with the supreme in the last couple of years. you might have noticed there have been some ethical questions about behavior. some of the justices, many of the most sincere issues that have arisen related behavior that was in some cases, 15 or 20 years ago. why are we only learning about it now? because there's an entire press corps that covers the supreme court that never thought this was part of their job. right. to actually look at the justices personal behavior and that it took propublica and its reporting. when we look at sort of the supreme decisions. i suspect you guys have been following some of them lately. this is a it's relatively new for the court to be in the headlines every. right. and yet is. how did that happen? well, that actually happened because quietly. but gradually over the 20th century, congress gave and the court took more and more power over stuff no one cares a
the supreme court. so what do i mean by that? right i mean, so look at sort of some of the big things that have happened with the supreme in the last couple of years. you might have noticed there have been some ethical questions about behavior. some of the justices, many of the most sincere issues that have arisen related behavior that was in some cases, 15 or 20 years ago. why are we only learning about it now? because there's an entire press corps that covers the supreme court that never...
0
0.0
Apr 3, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because people often think of court as a conservative court or even a radically conservative court. my thesis is a little bit different. it's that it's a captured court in exactly same way that in the bad old days the railroad captured and ran for own benefit. the railroad commission. so that's come stepped one concept to to keep in mind is covered operations. i was on the intelligence committee for a while. my father spent an early part of his career before he officially became a state official as an agency. the official and i love reading spy novels. so for all those different reasons, you know, you see how a covert operation runs and very often governments run operations against and in other countries and very often they have the purpose of trying disrupt the foreign country to foment dispute to prop up political parties to put poisonous propaganda into the political discussion in that country, to bribe and cajole and even capture organizations that country. and my thesis is what has happened in the united states is internal covert operation and run largely by the fossil fuel ind
because people often think of court as a conservative court or even a radically conservative court. my thesis is a little bit different. it's that it's a captured court in exactly same way that in the bad old days the railroad captured and ran for own benefit. the railroad commission. so that's come stepped one concept to to keep in mind is covered operations. i was on the intelligence committee for a while. my father spent an early part of his career before he officially became a state...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of holding a preparatory court hearing, it was, the case had been in court since april 2, and the courting these days could hold this hearing and consider all the questions, the very thought... was quite clear to us, and we believed that on april 19, because the client's precautionary sunset at night, he should be released, because this issue was not considered in this way. we were informed, and the activists who were present at this court session, which lasted 3 minutes, and the court itself informed us that the session will no longer take place, a break has been announced, at 6:05 p.m., we will inform you of the next date after the court session e. what is reflected in the court documents, after, after that, it is important, my colleagues, lawyers kostyantyn globo and andriy yosypov, they arrived at the court there and tried to get into the territory of the court, they they couldn't do it, it was right after the closing of the court session, its adjournment, no, they weren't allowed in, the kirovohrad court is threatened by a fence, sorry for the russianism, and there's even a little
of holding a preparatory court hearing, it was, the case had been in court since april 2, and the courting these days could hold this hearing and consider all the questions, the very thought... was quite clear to us, and we believed that on april 19, because the client's precautionary sunset at night, he should be released, because this issue was not considered in this way. we were informed, and the activists who were present at this court session, which lasted 3 minutes, and the court itself...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to date, we have indeed received confirmation from the court, from the court's decision, we see that court has moved him there to kirovohrad sizo, but that's all for now. during this year, as the charges have changed, if the charges against chervinsky have changed, what are they accusing him of as of now and what is at stake for him as of now? well. there was just a plot in which everything was explained in detail, he is currently in the kiroograd court, there is neither the purpose of roman hryhorovych's actions, nor the intent, with what criminal intent he acted, and these are mandatory elements of any crime, it must be established criminal intent of a person. i remember when a year ago i immersed myself in this case and analyzed, well, as a journalist, the main question before me and my interlocutors at that time. was whether roman chervinsky could organize and implement this whole special operation at the samotuzhka airfield. please tell me whether the investigation and the court gave an answer to this question, whether he organized it on his own, or if someone helped him, well,
to date, we have indeed received confirmation from the court, from the court's decision, we see that court has moved him there to kirovohrad sizo, but that's all for now. during this year, as the charges have changed, if the charges against chervinsky have changed, what are they accusing him of as of now and what is at stake for him as of now? well. there was just a plot in which everything was explained in detail, he is currently in the kiroograd court, there is neither the purpose of roman...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
court. this is the place where the mobs overwhelmed the capital which is right across the way, bashed in those injured. i mean, i watched it from a building across the way. i looked out the windows and saw them attacking the sayyed of the building. >> the justices have said that they want to decide whether or not the then president can be held accountable for that day. >> and that is an incredibly weighty question for us as a republic. and it really inserts the supreme court into a central role in deciding whether or not that same person is going to become president in the united states again. and i mean to your point, paula the delays here and this their decision, how they decide this could generate another set of potential delays if their decision ultimately is what means that there's no answer to whether or not trump is accountable for that day before the election. that means that millions of americans are going to have to go and decide whether they want to put donald trump back in office
court. this is the place where the mobs overwhelmed the capital which is right across the way, bashed in those injured. i mean, i watched it from a building across the way. i looked out the windows and saw them attacking the sayyed of the building. >> the justices have said that they want to decide whether or not the then president can be held accountable for that day. >> and that is an incredibly weighty question for us as a republic. and it really inserts the supreme court into a...
0
0.0
Apr 6, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court. i think that's really the confluence of two largely unrelated developments which is a general disengaged by congress in the historical role it had played vis a vis the court which predates the more recent polarization of congress. i mean, which really starts, gosh, the 1940s and fifties, and that that sort of builds, builds and builds and builds so that by the 1980s, when the court goes to congress and says, hey, congress, take away all the remain in, you know, handcuffs on our jurisdiction, conflict sure. what else can we give you? and that's you know, that's before think the current generation. and then you have really fluky historical moments that provide for radical transitions in the center of gravity on. the court. i mean, you know, if justice marshall had not retired when he did he died a month into bill clinton's presidency. right. a world in he replaced by bill clinton as opposed george h.w. bush is a world in which you know, i mean, he was replaced by clarence thomas. imagin
the court. i think that's really the confluence of two largely unrelated developments which is a general disengaged by congress in the historical role it had played vis a vis the court which predates the more recent polarization of congress. i mean, which really starts, gosh, the 1940s and fifties, and that that sort of builds, builds and builds and builds so that by the 1980s, when the court goes to congress and says, hey, congress, take away all the remain in, you know, handcuffs on our...
68
68
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 68
favorite 0
quote 1
stay tuned for that at the new york state supreme court, dueling courts today. more to come tomorrow. we will sea you then. 's v. >> more on that in a moment not that. day 7 on trial for trump we are live in new york where today's session is expected to wrap shortly. the former president is expected to emerge from the courtroom and make remarks when he does we martha: are there. the former national enquirer publisher david pecker on the stand and now being questioned by the trump legal team. earlier he detailed a phone call he had with the former president about payments made to karen mcdougal. he claimed trump was upset that stormy daniels broke in agreement not to use his name. and welcome everyone and sandra smith and for neil cavuto, this is your world. it's a busy day in the trump legal world we've got you covered with fox team coverage. nate foy on the new york trial of what's going on inside the courtroom right now. are legal eagles jonathan and andy mccarthy, katie czajkowski are here. we begin with nate in new york. hague nate. >> reporter: hey sandra.
stay tuned for that at the new york state supreme court, dueling courts today. more to come tomorrow. we will sea you then. 's v. >> more on that in a moment not that. day 7 on trial for trump we are live in new york where today's session is expected to wrap shortly. the former president is expected to emerge from the courtroom and make remarks when he does we martha: are there. the former national enquirer publisher david pecker on the stand and now being questioned by the trump legal...
54
54
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 54
favorite 0
quote 1
shannon, you are at the court. this is the last case that the court is going to hear this year and arguably, no question, the most consequential. >> absolutely to all of these federal actions now pending against the former president. and there has been criticism of the supreme court they didn't handle this quickly enough. actually we all know in covering the court this is rocket speed for them to get a petition, take it up, have briefing and arguments and add something to the calendar this quickly. normally the most sub staetive cases come in late june and early july. because of what's at stake in this case we think it could come sooner than that. >> gillian: trump wanted to be here today at the supreme court. he is not. he is at new york supreme court facing criminal charges in his trial there. do you think his presence here today would have made an impact, any kind of difference on the judges' mindset coming into the oral arguments? >> i don't think it would change the judges' mindset. in some ways having them in
shannon, you are at the court. this is the last case that the court is going to hear this year and arguably, no question, the most consequential. >> absolutely to all of these federal actions now pending against the former president. and there has been criticism of the supreme court they didn't handle this quickly enough. actually we all know in covering the court this is rocket speed for them to get a petition, take it up, have briefing and arguments and add something to the calendar...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's i'll put through the court moves there is a world where he loses on the substance, but the courton late in july that would be bad. the jack smith timeline, it could be that he loses, but the court sends us back case back to judge talking to trial level for more findings. again, that's bad for jack smith. timeline. so if you're the former president, all you so we're looking for here is no bold action by the court. you don't want a decisive, sweeping decision that said the immunity. you want something either in the middle, four, four victory. i don't think any serious legal scholars think the court is going to come out and adopt an absolute immunity framework. but there is a real risk that they're going to do something in the middle at all. that's going to have this case dragging on. & you look at the timeline, will under so far the court has not moved quickly here. they have not act like this case is truly an emergency. so i don't suspect they're going to do so with their decision. >> even though a lot of it has gone under the label of expedited and emergencies but i guess those a
it's i'll put through the court moves there is a world where he loses on the substance, but the courton late in july that would be bad. the jack smith timeline, it could be that he loses, but the court sends us back case back to judge talking to trial level for more findings. again, that's bad for jack smith. timeline. so if you're the former president, all you so we're looking for here is no bold action by the court. you don't want a decisive, sweeping decision that said the immunity. you want...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the court in this case, and this is a fairly rare infor the court to do in the early 1900s. is the court at that time was really conservative. anyet on this particular issue, all nine justices came together behind one opinion and said that gender differences justify why what they called at the time protective legislation regarding work hours. so what is it that is in the due process clause that might restrict the flexibility of state governments to pass the kinds of health, safety, welfare and morals regulations that it sees fit? well, the 14th amendment says that no state, meaning no state government, shall deprive to any person life, liberty or property without due process of law. note a couple of things. one, the obligation of state governments does not apply only to citizens. it applies to any person who happens to be in that state. you're not a state student here at umbc. you have the state of maryland has just as much a due process obligation for you as it does someone who was born and raised in baltimore county. another thing is, well, how should we construe this sent
and the court in this case, and this is a fairly rare infor the court to do in the early 1900s. is the court at that time was really conservative. anyet on this particular issue, all nine justices came together behind one opinion and said that gender differences justify why what they called at the time protective legislation regarding work hours. so what is it that is in the due process clause that might restrict the flexibility of state governments to pass the kinds of health, safety, welfare...
0
0.0
Apr 14, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
dragged into court is no fun. this can be done at a nearby place where people live at a time that is convenient for your job, and so i appreciate the question. sen. cotton: claimants in arbitration who have a lawyer, they can get discovery, get relevant materials? mr. schwartz: the discovery is lengthy, costly, and disruptive to one's life, that is for sure. i don't want to be on the wrong side of that one. sen. cotton: there has been a lot of talk about nda's, nondisclosure agreements, or secrecy agreements. just be clear, arbitration agreements and nondisclosure agreements are not the same thing? mr. schwartz: correct. nondisclosure agreements are a separate peace, and they are used in litigation when you settle a case. you sign nda's. but you cannot muzzle somebody from giving the results of arbitration or complaining about it. sen. cotton: ok. my time is almost up, but it sounds like from your testimony you believe that arbitration is less expensive and faster than federal courts that claimants tend to do just
dragged into court is no fun. this can be done at a nearby place where people live at a time that is convenient for your job, and so i appreciate the question. sen. cotton: claimants in arbitration who have a lawyer, they can get discovery, get relevant materials? mr. schwartz: the discovery is lengthy, costly, and disruptive to one's life, that is for sure. i don't want to be on the wrong side of that one. sen. cotton: there has been a lot of talk about nda's, nondisclosure agreements, or...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the supreme court. first off, supreme court justice thomas should behind anything near anything like this. we all know his wife backed the insurrection and it is just disgraceful. but that court, the lower court said that he is not -- that he cannot get presidential immunity. >> there is not absolute immunity. >> absolutely not. and there shouldn't be absolute immunity when they were discussing how it is personal or presidential. nothing he is doing is presidential. there is -- i keep hearing the word unprecedented. everything is unprecedented. i'm really tired of hearing that word. to me, that is an excuse, and there is no excuse for anything this man has done. he has treated the united states like it's his own personal bank account. i am so tired of hearing from anything from him and i told my husband, my worst nightmare is when he does not get elected this time because he still didn't get a second term, is he still going to run his mouth for the next four years, four more years of campaigning until g
to the supreme court. first off, supreme court justice thomas should behind anything near anything like this. we all know his wife backed the insurrection and it is just disgraceful. but that court, the lower court said that he is not -- that he cannot get presidential immunity. >> there is not absolute immunity. >> absolutely not. and there shouldn't be absolute immunity when they were discussing how it is personal or presidential. nothing he is doing is presidential. there is -- i...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and may it please the court. throughout the litigation at times this morning, petitioners have characterized this case as presenting a fundamental question of the separation of powers and a test of article iii. will courts continue to say what the law is? but i want to make sure what doesn't get lost in the shuffle is that petitioners have made an important concession that i think illustrates that the issue here is actually far narrower and their attacks on chevron lack merit and are unnecessary. the concession is this. petitioners acknowledge congress can expressly delegate to agencies the authority to define terms and fill gaps. and imagine if the statute said they were asked to define the administrator. i take both petitioners to give that up and recognize that is a delegation and courts should respect that. the role of the court in that circumstance is to make sure the agency has followed the procedures and stated within whatever outer bounds congress has set. and all of that complies with the constitution, o
and may it please the court. throughout the litigation at times this morning, petitioners have characterized this case as presenting a fundamental question of the separation of powers and a test of article iii. will courts continue to say what the law is? but i want to make sure what doesn't get lost in the shuffle is that petitioners have made an important concession that i think illustrates that the issue here is actually far narrower and their attacks on chevron lack merit and are...
0
0.0
Apr 14, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court justices go from elite schools into elite law jobs than probably court judgeships. and then a supreme court seat, they're not working in factories earlier in life. so you could say that the kinds of scientific information in a case like mueller would have been really because that's not something that the justices would have had rattling around in their mind to begin with. right. so what do you guys think? how comfortable are you with using science as a way to advance a legal argument? now, let's start here. i was just thinking about that and i feel like with people using scientific evidence, it's something that justices can't ignore because if they ignore it, then the public, i mean, their reputation could come under fire for not caring about the people who are supposed to protect and i also feel like it's effective way to kind of give up your judgment on a certain matter because you not the subject matter expert. yeah. so it's like knowledge of in a judicial humility that you don't know all the facts and you can't just get all the facts from first. emma got you did
supreme court justices go from elite schools into elite law jobs than probably court judgeships. and then a supreme court seat, they're not working in factories earlier in life. so you could say that the kinds of scientific information in a case like mueller would have been really because that's not something that the justices would have had rattling around in their mind to begin with. right. so what do you guys think? how comfortable are you with using science as a way to advance a legal...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in 2017 , the competition in the supreme court is ongoing. the highest court of the country. for the post of judge in bohdan lviv claims this newly reformed institution. this was a big and loud reform of 2017. then the public integrity council , having analyzed the activities of lviv and its property status, came to the conclusion: the judge does not meet the criteria of integrity. however, lviv still got to the reformed court. how was the selection? is a person admitted to state secrets without restrictions. in the written questionnaire, then still a candidate. when dad asked a fundamental question whether he has the citizenship of another country, lviv said: no, but we know what yes, he had the citizenship of the russian federation both at the stage of the competition and has not lost it until now. bohdan lviv received his russian passport at the end of the 90s. at that time, he was already administering justice in ukraine, as a judge of the military court of the central region. here is an extract from the official register of rospassport, which schemes they received. there
in 2017 , the competition in the supreme court is ongoing. the highest court of the country. for the post of judge in bohdan lviv claims this newly reformed institution. this was a big and loud reform of 2017. then the public integrity council , having analyzed the activities of lviv and its property status, came to the conclusion: the judge does not meet the criteria of integrity. however, lviv still got to the reformed court. how was the selection? is a person admitted to state secrets...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so the european court a few minutes, right? so it's really saying that the, the switched government needs to do something about that. but more importantly, this case also opens doors to other cases and makes other countries from ripple to, to the kind of cases that we've just seen in white, switzerland under. there were other cases that were were what, thrown outright portugal, france, and most people don't think of the switzerland, it as being the place where you have i, i guess the, the least being done to save the environment. i mean, this is how to know why switzerland caught through as a case. i mean that with 2 other cases a court as well once again, one against portugal and 52 other european nations. the other one against, from those 2 folks thrown out perhaps because switzerland is so small and this was such a detailed look at what they've been doing. and perhaps because these women could also prove that there was, you know, an impact on their life as a result of the climate change and the adverse effects that we're see
so the european court a few minutes, right? so it's really saying that the, the switched government needs to do something about that. but more importantly, this case also opens doors to other cases and makes other countries from ripple to, to the kind of cases that we've just seen in white, switzerland under. there were other cases that were were what, thrown outright portugal, france, and most people don't think of the switzerland, it as being the place where you have i, i guess the, the least...
0
0.0
Apr 3, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court should reaffirm there is no income without realization pre-i welcome the courts questions. >> when you say realization do you have a definition or explanation as to what it is? how is it different from, say, attribution? like thank you justice thomas. realization in the main will be receipts. in other situations it will be other types of enjoyment of economic gain such as the taxpayer can put that game -- gain it to his or her uses and benefits. that might be forgiveness of a loan or assignment of income to a third party. >> there is certainly realization here by the corporation, if not the taxpayers. it's not a case like appreciation of property were nothing has happened. you buy property and you are holding it for 20 years and you have not sold it and nothing has happened. here, something has happened. income has gone to the corporation. >> guess the corporation has income. we don't dispute the corporation realized income over the decade plus years taxed by the mrt. i think it is like the instance of property from the point of view of the shareholders. the shareholder int
the court should reaffirm there is no income without realization pre-i welcome the courts questions. >> when you say realization do you have a definition or explanation as to what it is? how is it different from, say, attribution? like thank you justice thomas. realization in the main will be receipts. in other situations it will be other types of enjoyment of economic gain such as the taxpayer can put that game -- gain it to his or her uses and benefits. that might be forgiveness of a...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is that court protected conduct, >>> >> we don't think that is court protected conduct.ould characterize that episode quite that way. we do agree that the department of justice allegations were a use of the president's official power. in many ways, we think that aggravates the nature of this offense. seeking as a candidate to oust the lawful winner of the election and have once self certified with private actors is a private scheme to achieve a private end and many of the co-conspirators alleged in the indictment are private. for an incumbent president to then use his presidential powers to try to enhance the likelihood that it succeeds makes the claim, in our view, worse. >> on february 29th, on this program, senator sheldon whitehouse outlined the reasons why clarence thomas should not have been hearing this case today. >> jack smith's case could very well introduce evidence about the insurrection, introduce evidence about justice thomas's wife jenny thomas role in that insurrection, including correspondence directly with the defendants, trump's chief of staff, justice
is that court protected conduct, >>> >> we don't think that is court protected conduct.ould characterize that episode quite that way. we do agree that the department of justice allegations were a use of the president's official power. in many ways, we think that aggravates the nature of this offense. seeking as a candidate to oust the lawful winner of the election and have once self certified with private actors is a private scheme to achieve a private end and many of the...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the grand chamber of the supreme court canceled the decision of the northern court of appeal.recognizing that judges kropyvna, zubets and aldanova, giving enterprise to the russians, mistakes were made. without any legal grounds and contrary to authority, they changed the subject of the dispute and went beyond the scope of reviewing the case. the motivational and resolutive part of the pachs ruling were contradictory and based on mutually exclusive conclusions. also, a trio of judges led by kropyvna intervened in the ownership of the ferrekpo company, changing the rulings. non-existent shares for existing ones, and also knowingly and unjustifiably ignored government regulations and legal norms, and was guided by assumptions instead of evidence. at the same time, having taken 40% of the shares from the legal owners, the judges left the funds received by them for the sold and disputed shares - 27 million dollars - in the possession of the plaintiff and third parties. so, thanks to the pachs decision , kremlin businessmen not only got richer by 27 million, but also actually recei
the grand chamber of the supreme court canceled the decision of the northern court of appeal.recognizing that judges kropyvna, zubets and aldanova, giving enterprise to the russians, mistakes were made. without any legal grounds and contrary to authority, they changed the subject of the dispute and went beyond the scope of reviewing the case. the motivational and resolutive part of the pachs ruling were contradictory and based on mutually exclusive conclusions. also, a trio of judges led by...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the us supreme court dean is good to see you. you know, the focus of the trump trials has been on new york until today. now it's exactly where you are set the mood for is there. yeah, right. friends and you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are a trump supporters of tribes to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards done by donald trump. to do so. and then of course, it took donald trump a couple of hours before you ask them to stop trying actually to, to the wife present. so this is a very uploaded atmosphere here. there's a lot at stake, and that's what people told us who traveled to you a to washington to witness this historic day. no, i don't know one's above the law in this country. i think there's numerous laws he's broken and i think he needs to pay for him and face the music of unity. unity charges should be dropped because there are certain to
the us supreme court dean is good to see you. you know, the focus of the trump trials has been on new york until today. now it's exactly where you are set the mood for is there. yeah, right. friends and you know, just to give you a little bit of an idea of the space, the supreme court is right behind me in the capital is just a couple of 100 yards away. and this is, of course we are a trump supporters of tribes to stop the peaceful transfer of power in january of 6 of 2021 day of feeding cards...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is the 1st court ruling of its kind. today, europe's top of human rights court ruled in favor of a group of swiss pensioners who had argued their governments in action on climate change has put their lives in danger. it's a landmark decision that could influence legislation all across europe. and you could give a boost to activists who say their governments are failing to tackle global warming . of these women have made climate history some 2500 swiss pensioners suit their own government because it's handling of the claimant crisis, put their health at risk. the european human rights courts and strossberg funds ruled in their favor. a landmarks decision cementing the idea that governments clements in action can violate human rights. as the step by step talk, this is the best they. yep. that's we have the right thing history. and as i pushed on the way i understood it, switzerland has done too little, took up the time of crisis and violated human rights. that's a nice victory bagley's. i do not see. some of the applicants
it is the 1st court ruling of its kind. today, europe's top of human rights court ruled in favor of a group of swiss pensioners who had argued their governments in action on climate change has put their lives in danger. it's a landmark decision that could influence legislation all across europe. and you could give a boost to activists who say their governments are failing to tackle global warming . of these women have made climate history some 2500 swiss pensioners suit their own government...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so same set of courts shouldn't continue. number one, if you go to the bottom rank or they were constructed for us, 10 of main core drugs and the stop today we have 91, did just so impressed extra that was made in 1947 is not sufficient for the 91, just that the poseidon or the courts in by me and others, henderson the number of the just the meant for listening distance to the population out country. it's your dad. the one judge. pull it up $50000.00 population or in fact we should have presented just for the balloon publishing and we have on well, what are the times less than what we actually did the grant that the instructor is so bad in the new digital system, the governor's government which came to bought in 1947 did not interest enough money in this order of the state. the be all meant had been blind in jewels funds, not on me to build a large number of courts. not only send them the traditional system, but also includes the number of judges. we have more than 5 broad cases, spending all over the country. now that it's t
so same set of courts shouldn't continue. number one, if you go to the bottom rank or they were constructed for us, 10 of main core drugs and the stop today we have 91, did just so impressed extra that was made in 1947 is not sufficient for the 91, just that the poseidon or the courts in by me and others, henderson the number of the just the meant for listening distance to the population out country. it's your dad. the one judge. pull it up $50000.00 population or in fact we should have...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and what's really important here about this, john, is that the high court, the 2 high court judges that are heard julian's, the hearing on february 20 and 21 we're talking about here. this is by the way, just to hearing so that drilling assange could have an appeal. this is an appeal about an appeal because he had been denied the right to have an appeal or to leave for an appeal. so those judges said in their 66 page ruling, 2 very important things on the death penalty. there were strongly blunt. i'm going to quote, they said if extradition of a shot would quote the contract to the convention rights us european can match any human rights under the british human rights act of 1998 article 3, which is against georgia in human degrading treatment to punch in other words, the death penalty and other words if the extradition is contrary to that right, the extradition must be refused. that means without the assurance from the united states that they will not seek the death penalty. there's an automatic refusal of distribution, julius on goes free. why haven't they given that assurance yet? no
and what's really important here about this, john, is that the high court, the 2 high court judges that are heard julian's, the hearing on february 20 and 21 we're talking about here. this is by the way, just to hearing so that drilling assange could have an appeal. this is an appeal about an appeal because he had been denied the right to have an appeal or to leave for an appeal. so those judges said in their 66 page ruling, 2 very important things on the death penalty. there were strongly...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a sharply divided supreme court. arguments for the special counsel and donald trump of whether the president can be prosecuted after he or she leaves office. this was a messy case. there was pushback against the special counsel lawyer here. you could see the court and at least two justices that i counted, wanting to send it back -- not just to the appeals court but possibly the district court to argue over legal issues about immunity. >> indeed. it's just been an extraordinary thing to be able to listen to this. there is a precedent setting requirement for what is going on today. the big question is which of the justices felt that this was something maybe they should be deciding on in a complete fashion or maybe send it back. >> i think what was interesting -- we started with the extremes. the lawyer for president trump coming out saying, the president has absolute immunity for official acts. you had the lawyer representing the government, special counsel, who brought the case in the d.c. election interference crimin
a sharply divided supreme court. arguments for the special counsel and donald trump of whether the president can be prosecuted after he or she leaves office. this was a messy case. there was pushback against the special counsel lawyer here. you could see the court and at least two justices that i counted, wanting to send it back -- not just to the appeals court but possibly the district court to argue over legal issues about immunity. >> indeed. it's just been an extraordinary thing to be...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november, i suppose he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he codes a destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution. dream. of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open a like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, his kind of a i guess, to restore or kind of keep him in power for however long he wants to be and friends . you know, this really i think that is true, which would really attack the democracy as we know, it's right now in the united states. and if the court says he does not enjoy absolute immunity, wearable this puts donald trump. now there is a, this big fear that it will take far too long before the core tear behind me makes the decision some expect to not through before june. and that would basically mean uh that wouldn't be hold accountable and discount crim
there is a lot at stake with this supreme court decision. what will it mean if donald trump wins this case? and if he wins the presidential election in november, i suppose he basically can do whatever he wants to do. he could basically order the killing of a political opponent. he codes a destroy the constitution because he would be immune of any prosecution. dream. of course, his presidency, but also afterwards this would open a like a whole new of options for donald trump to well, his kind of...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
RUSSIA24
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, each judge... considered approximately 60 cases, in arbitration courts, arbitration courts consideredround 170 cases per month, and if we talk about the workload, it is uneven between the courts, but as the chairman of the judicial panel for economic disputes, these figures are closer to me, i can tell you that with an average workload of 170 cases, somewhere there are such courts. when making changes to the civil procedure code, one of the proposals was to increase the threshold of cases that are considered in simplified procedures; previously, simplified procedures considered cases where the amount of the claim was up to 100.00 rubles. we contributed proposal to increase this amount to 500,000 rubles. we hope that our proposals will be adopted in the second reading, which will put a very heavy burden on the arbitration courts. give cases of insolvency and bankruptcy so that you understand that there are such isolated disputes, they are simple - in terms of their plot and in nature, they are not difficult for the courts to consider, but their number, last year there were 2,600 such c
, each judge... considered approximately 60 cases, in arbitration courts, arbitration courts consideredround 170 cases per month, and if we talk about the workload, it is uneven between the courts, but as the chairman of the judicial panel for economic disputes, these figures are closer to me, i can tell you that with an average workload of 170 cases, somewhere there are such courts. when making changes to the civil procedure code, one of the proposals was to increase the threshold of cases...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court today. a sense from the line of questioning there is a view that some level of presidential immunity might be required? >> the first thing i noticed was the gravity of the day. it felt a lot like the january 6 hearings where you just had to get it right. we knew on the committee we had to get the facts right. you could feel from the justices today they really wanted to not just create a rule for today but create a rule for future misconduct as well. there is competing interests going on. you can see it from the justices. one of a ruling that would have a chilling effect on the president being able to act in practice. on the other side, whether a president really should think about not violent criminal statutes. that is really what's going on here today. it will be interesting to see what the court comes down within its ruling. caitriona: given the gravity you are talking about, there seem to be a suggestion the whole issue needs a deeper examination and perhaps needs to go back to the lower
supreme court today. a sense from the line of questioning there is a view that some level of presidential immunity might be required? >> the first thing i noticed was the gravity of the day. it felt a lot like the january 6 hearings where you just had to get it right. we knew on the committee we had to get the facts right. you could feel from the justices today they really wanted to not just create a rule for today but create a rule for future misconduct as well. there is competing...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
from the district court through until today? we believe that president trump has absolute immunity for his official acts in office. the di doesn't draw that he absolutely does. the dc district, unfortunately, issued a ruling that said there is absolutely no immunity in the criminal context, the dc circuit affirmed that incorrect ruling. and the reason why the argument today i think took the tender that it didn't probably the reason why we're before the supreme court at all is because of the agreed justness of those decisions to not recognize any immunity in the criminal context whatsoever. >> well, the supreme court, the justices did see the conservative ones, at least skeptical of that. but i have to ask you, something else because when one of the justices asked today if the president ordered a military coup, if that would be considered an official act, your team, john sauer argued, quote, it would depend on the circumstances, whether it was an official act. >> what what are the circumstances were ordering a military coup is an
from the district court through until today? we believe that president trump has absolute immunity for his official acts in office. the di doesn't draw that he absolutely does. the dc district, unfortunately, issued a ruling that said there is absolutely no immunity in the criminal context, the dc circuit affirmed that incorrect ruling. and the reason why the argument today i think took the tender that it didn't probably the reason why we're before the supreme court at all is because of the...
0
0.0
Apr 20, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in federal court's. i submit that is if we would submit that that is a very serious tool to put in the hands of prosecutors. we urge that the c >> washington journal, our live form involving you. from washington dc and across the country. sunday morning, axios reporter stephen newman discusses that house vote. click -- charlie cook talks about issues and trends. bradley bowman on the u.s. role in the israel-hamas war and recent military strife between israel and iran. c-span's washington journal. joint in the conversation at 7:00 eastern sunday morning on c-span, c-span now, are free mobile app, or online at c-span.org. ♪ >> do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you god? >> saturdays, watch american history stevie congress investigates as we explore major investigations in the country's history by the u.s. house and senate. others and historians will tell these stories. we will see historic footage from those pe
in federal court's. i submit that is if we would submit that that is a very serious tool to put in the hands of prosecutors. we urge that the c >> washington journal, our live form involving you. from washington dc and across the country. sunday morning, axios reporter stephen newman discusses that house vote. click -- charlie cook talks about issues and trends. bradley bowman on the u.s. role in the israel-hamas war and recent military strife between israel and iran. c-span's washington...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the palestinian government has also approved the statute of the court. in order to arrest the accused , it is not necessary for the crime to be completely proven , but for there to be reasonable evidence to show that there is a possibility of someone committing a crime, well, the genocide in gaza has been proven for almost all the people of the world, the reasons even it is more than convincing, that is , at this stage, the reasons are less than this, which can justify the arrest and prosecution than the reasons now much more than this, and especially according to paragraph one of article 58, one of the reasons that justify the necessity of arrest is to prevent the accused from committing a crime , which seems to be a very serious risk for the israeli authorities, according to article 86 of the constitution of the member states. in the investigation and prosecution of crimes , they must cooperate with the court. according to article 89, the court can also request the arrest and surrender of the accused from the governments in whose territory the accused
the palestinian government has also approved the statute of the court. in order to arrest the accused , it is not necessary for the crime to be completely proven , but for there to be reasonable evidence to show that there is a possibility of someone committing a crime, well, the genocide in gaza has been proven for almost all the people of the world, the reasons even it is more than convincing, that is , at this stage, the reasons are less than this, which can justify the arrest and...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
. >> reporter: the state court of appeals also said the trial court abused its discretion when it said weinstein could be cross-examined about those three other women. >> even if he denied them, just the fact of being accused of them could allow the jury to infer his guilt based on prior behavior. >> reporter: he then decided not to testify. one of those women was dawn dunning. today she said people have asked me if i regret having testified, was this all for naught, and my answer is a resounding. no. we spoke with other weinstein accusers not involved in the trial. >> all of the fear and the panic and the confusion from the original trauma comes back. >> i'm deeply concerned. it's a setback for justice for survivors. >> reporter: in a dissenting opinion, three justices wrote "men who serially sexually exploit their power over women will reap the benefit of today's decision." >> we've already heard this refrain about me too has gone too far. there is going to be some people out there thinking oh, good. so now we've redressed the balance. and i don't think me too ever went far enough. >
. >> reporter: the state court of appeals also said the trial court abused its discretion when it said weinstein could be cross-examined about those three other women. >> even if he denied them, just the fact of being accused of them could allow the jury to infer his guilt based on prior behavior. >> reporter: he then decided not to testify. one of those women was dawn dunning. today she said people have asked me if i regret having testified, was this all for naught, and my...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i'd even domestic courts have, have started intervening benevolence, dutch court of appeal, for example, or did the suspension of um, sales to israel on the basis of a clear risk that they'd be used to commit violations of the law of armed conflict . and so that's quite a lot of clear evidence of serious risk the violations of international being committed in golf. and now why do you think it is nicaragua? whole countries finding this case? yeah, it's a very good question. nick roger is actually of a common litigation before the international court of justice that so, so it's a paid quite frequently before the court. many of those cases concerned its neighbors in, in central and south america. but some have concerned all the states, and in particular, 40 years ago, nicaragua brought a case against the united states. but the us is intervention and supportive of rebel groups within nicaragua itself. and that was alluded to by nick ragas agent this morning in the court. it's also the case that this is an example of, of what we might think of as public interest litigation or an applicant st
i'd even domestic courts have, have started intervening benevolence, dutch court of appeal, for example, or did the suspension of um, sales to israel on the basis of a clear risk that they'd be used to commit violations of the law of armed conflict . and so that's quite a lot of clear evidence of serious risk the violations of international being committed in golf. and now why do you think it is nicaragua? whole countries finding this case? yeah, it's a very good question. nick roger is...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court cannot decide such a dispute without the consent of albania. and this is not the case like now room where the determination is with respect to australia, is contact nearly might've had implications for the legal situation of the u. k. in new zealand. and the court was in a position to hold that no finding in respect of that legal situation will be needed as a basis for the court's decision on that res claims against australia. by contrast, the current case is precisely analogous to east timor with paul. she goes k as to the law fullness of australia's conduct. in entering into the 1989 treaty with indonesia could not be assessed without 1st entering into the question why it is that indonesia click not law free. have concluded the 1989 tracy. again, current case is on the whole force to turn to the existence of a dispute, which is a basic prerequisite to consent to jurisdiction and to pay thoughts cool. 9 at the genocide convention and article $36.00 to the quote statute. the dispute that is where the item must exist objectively at the time the
the court cannot decide such a dispute without the consent of albania. and this is not the case like now room where the determination is with respect to australia, is contact nearly might've had implications for the legal situation of the u. k. in new zealand. and the court was in a position to hold that no finding in respect of that legal situation will be needed as a basis for the court's decision on that res claims against australia. by contrast, the current case is precisely analogous to...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there's court reform, there's stacking the court? what is the path because clearly something more structural is necessary. >> i think as we think about this administration and its legacy, i think it was -- it will go down as having been a historic miscalculation. >> biden administration. >> biden administration to not have made aest at supreme court. they put together a commission that produced a report no one red it was not a serious effort. >> why? because the president biden i worked for him at that time i was a part of the transition, and i worked in the white house and i know for a fact and you been asking the questions there i was there. he himself does not believe that that is an avenue that should be explored. you know, joe biden is somebody that believes that in the rules and laws and systems, and one could argue, it's time to do things differently. >> i mean, yeah, i am aware of that view and he is holding the wrong view. this court is running rough shot through the constitution. they in the last few years, they overturned
there's court reform, there's stacking the court? what is the path because clearly something more structural is necessary. >> i think as we think about this administration and its legacy, i think it was -- it will go down as having been a historic miscalculation. >> biden administration. >> biden administration to not have made aest at supreme court. they put together a commission that produced a report no one red it was not a serious effort. >> why? because the...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it w n raised in the district court and it was not raedn the court of appeals. analysis i would use to get there is a fusion of a couple of principles. the court has often resolved threshold questions atre a prerequisite to an intelligent resolution of the eson presented. in a case like united states versus grubbs, the court reached outoecide whether anticipatory warrants are valid under the fourth amendment before turning to the question ofhether the triggering condition for an anticipatory warrant d be in the warrant. th is one principle. and then a precedent that bes some analogy to this is vermt natural resources agency v. united states. the first question washeer a state agency was a psowithin the meaning of thend the second question s ether if the state agency was 11th amendmenimnity kicked in, and the court wrote an analysis of why it could reach both questions. reaching the person questionid not expand jurisdiction d made sense as a matter of constitutional avoidance to do that. there are considerations that cut against this. for overall gornnt equities,
it w n raised in the district court and it was not raedn the court of appeals. analysis i would use to get there is a fusion of a couple of principles. the court has often resolved threshold questions atre a prerequisite to an intelligent resolution of the eson presented. in a case like united states versus grubbs, the court reached outoecide whether anticipatory warrants are valid under the fourth amendment before turning to the question ofhether the triggering condition for an anticipatory...