cinema council .imate, actually , this legal path took about a year, which we are now seeing at one of the meetings of the derzhkino council, where we saw we could to see yuriy gurbanov - this is one of the members of andriy artem kolyubaev, who is a business partner of andriy yermak, that is, such people, yes, absolutely , if in general, these people should have just left in the 23rd year. and instead of them , there should have been a transparent competition, they cannot be there twice , if there is such a big, big nuance, they cannot by law be in positions twice , and obviously this has become a problem for them or for the people whose interests they represent, now the community has consolidated, to me it seems that this is the first time in recent years that when very different productions, which i don't know yet, competed with each other a few years ago. united in reaching some kind of fair social contract, which will make it possible to restore trust in the institution, and secondly, to promote

i will tell you why this council is so important for ukrainian cinema, because the council for state cinema, it's responsible for distributing public money for film production, the board members, they're responsible for determining who wins and who doesn't, and this board has had its powers a year ago, even more than last march, and this whole year the lordship held on to its own chairs with the help of the management of the state cinema, for some reason they were very important for the state cinema, in particular, yuriy gorbanov is a member of the council, as well as artem kolyubaev, a long-time partner of andriy yermak, and now everything is recognized that these people are not legitimate, and without these people without advice, it is impossible to determine who will be the winner of this pitching, and that is why there are big discussions in the film community now, these people who came to this competition will still determine the winners there. whether this whole contest, which lasted a week, is also recognized as illegitimate, and a new contest will have to be held to announce,

cinema council until the end of martial law and it seems like another plus 6 months or something. themmunity reacted to it. we went through a difficult process together with the union of cinematographers of ukraine, caring colleagues, the public, three levels of courts, first instance, appeal, supreme court cassation, and in the end already in the supreme court cassation, the supreme court confirmed. the fact that the decision to extend the activities of the state film council is illegitimate, in fact, this legal process took about a year, we are now seeing one of the meetings of the state film council, there we saw, could see yuriy gurbanov, this is one of the members of andriy artem kolyubaev, who is a business andriy yermak's partner, i.e. such people, well yes, absolutely, well if, in general, these people should have simply left in the 23rd year and instead of them, they should have been at the transparent competition they can be there twice if there is a big, big nuance, they cannot by law be in positions twice and obviously this has become a problem for them or for the people w

cinema, because the council is responsible for state cinema for separation. public money for the productionlms, the members of the council, they are responsible for determining who will win and who won't win, and this council lost its powers a year ago, even more than last march, and this whole year the lordship held on to your seats with the help of the management of derzhkino, for some reason they were very important for derzhkino, in particular, yuriy gorbunov is a member of the board, as well as... artem kolyubaev, a long-time partner of andriy yermak, and now everything is recognized that these people are not legitimate, without these people , without advice, it is impossible to determine who will be the winner of this pitching, and that is why there is now a big discussion in the film community, will these people who came to this contest still determine the winners there, or will this entire contest, which lasted a week, also be recognized as illegitimate , and a new one will be needed. contest to be announced, let me remind you that this year a record amount was allocated for ukraini

cinema, because it is the council for state cinema. it's responsible for distributing public money for film production, the board members, they're responsible for determining who wins the film, who doesn't, and this board has woven its powers even a year ago, even more than last march, and this whole year the nobility held on to their seats with the help of the management of derzhkino, for some reason they were very important for derzhkino, and in particular, yuriy is a member of the council. gorbunov, as well as artem kolyubaev, a long-time partner of andriy yermak, and now everything is recognized that these people are not legitimate, without these people, without the council, it is impossible to determine who will be the winner of this pitching, and that is why there are now big discussions in the film community, and these people who came to this competition will still determine the winners there, or this whole one the contest, which lasted a week, is also recognized as illegitimate. and we will have to announce a new competition, i would like to remind you that this year a record a

cinema, the management of the state cinema, and the council of priderzhkin, it is beneficial to therent government, why they say that, i don't know, there are such rumors, in a word, but i will tell you, friends, that who still participates in this competition, who came, the first two days were devoted mainly to documentaries, not to feature films, or rather, to say, and since almost... all directors and directors who are engaged in truly documentary films, they are just in the opposition, they are boycotting and did not come, that's why mostly people who are engaged in television publicity came, it is very easy to confuse, many confuse, but still, these are very different things, documentary cinema is the one that i participate in at film festivals, it is a much more serious and creative genre, so we have projects , competing projects about, for example, wives of husbands. prisoners in crimea, how they live, how they survive, in general, what kind of life they have, it is interesting to look at this project, taking into account the fact that, for sure, you cannot show the faces or

the council for state support of cinema is a cinema support body whose members actually determine which projects in the competition are given money and which are not, and as a result. mean what movies we will watch, that is, the members of the council, and they are in fact, they are the decisive people, i will say that the council that currently exists has been recognized as illegitimate, various trials have been going on for a year and a new council must now be chosen, and now a large part of our film community is concerned about whether this process will be legal at all, well, for now... we are waiting for andrii, we will talk about elena kravyts, this is also a rather serious topic from my point of view, because a lot of, you know, some scandalous moments happen in our show business, and first of all a full-scale invasion, i it seems that this is a positive trend, although there is a popular opinion that tells us that we need to make less scandals, we need to fight less, but in the end i think that we... before the full-scale invasion, we really lacked this kind of heated discussion

for state support of cinema, it is such a body for... state cinema, the members of which actually determinerojects in the competition are given money, which are not, and as a result determine which films we will watch, i.e. the members of the council, and they are actually the decisive people, i will say that the council that currently exists has been recognized as illegitimate, various trials have been going on for a year and a new council must be chosen now. and now a large part of us is concerned film community, will this process be legal at all, well, while we are waiting for andrii, we will talk about elena kravyts, this is also quite a serious topic from my point of view, because you know a lot, we have some scandalous moments in show business and at first full-scale invasion, i think this is a positive trend, albeit a popular one. the opinion that tells us that we need to make less scandals, we need to fight less, but in the end, i think we fell far short of a full-scale invasion this is such a stormy discussion of our people, we say, we often discussed some russian bloggers there, w

for state support of cinema - it is the body that supports cinema, and it actually determines who getsey and who does n't money, and the term of office of the members , the first two days were devoted mainly to documentaries, not to feature films, to be more precise, and since almost all directors and directors who are engaged in real documentaries, they are precisely in opposition, they are boycotting. didn't come, that's why mostly people who are engaged in television publicity came, it is very easy to confuse, many confuse, but still these are very different things, documentary cinema is the one that participates in film festivals, it is a much more serious and creative genre, so we have projects, competing projects about, for example, the wives of political prisoners in crimea, how they live, how they survive, in general, what kind of life they have, it's interesting. to look at this project, given that it is certain that you cannot show the faces of these women, how will the directors even get out of this situation, also about the partisans in the occupied territory , a film was p

elections and state support for cinema, this is a cinema support body whose members actually determinech projects in the competition are given money and which are not, and as a result determine which we will watch films, that is, the members of the council, they are the decisive people, i will say that now the council that exists today, it was recognized as illegitimate already in... during the year, various trials took place and now a new council must be chosen, and now takes over much of our film community, will this process even be legal? well, while we are waiting for andrii, we will talk about olena kravets, this is also quite a serious topic from my point of view, because you know a lot, and we have some scandalous moments in show business, and at first you are full. invasion, it seems to me that this is a positive trend, although there is a popular opinion that tells us that we need to make less scandals, we need to fight less, but in the end, i think that we were very short of a full-scale invasion here is such a heated discussion of our persons, we say, we often discussed some