magera, he says that in this case the law is him goes beyond the constitution i.e. the law i.e. thating to the constitution there should be no such restrictions. that is, what, and here the law somewhat details excessive what can actually be, well, by the way, the law can be easily changed, yes, that is, 226 votes, but here questions arise, including on legitimacy, although, if a political decision will be made, then it will be carried out, there is no doubt here, there is no doubt, but it is really necessary, and he does not read my advice. thank you very much for participating, thank you for your comments, oleksiy gran, professor of political science at kivomaglyanska of the academy, the scientific director of the democratic initiatives foundation named after ilka kucheriva was in touch with us. natalka didenko will tell us about the weather in ukraine tomorrow, and then we will meet again. all synoptic. hello, dear ukrainians, dear viewers, we are starting today's hot meeting with a trip to the park, and we will talk about the kremenets botanical garden, not quite a park, it is a

magera, he says that in this case the law, it goes beyond the limits of the constitution, that is , the law, that is, that according to the constitution there should not be such restrictions, that is, that, and here the law somewhat details the excess of what can actually be, well , by the way, the law can be easily changed. then it will be held here, there is no doubt, but it is really necessary, and my advice is not to read social networks at night, thank you very much, even those that you trust, thank you very much for joining, thank you for your comments, oleksiy garan , professor head of the democratic fund on the initiative of kuchariva, he was in touch with us. natalka didenko will tell us what the weather will be like in ukraine tomorrow, and then we will meet again. synoptic greetings to all, dear ukrainians, dear viewers, uh, we are starting today's hot meeting with a trip to the park, and we will talk about the kremenets botanical garden, a park, it is a botanical garden of national importance in ukraine, located in the ternopil oblast, in in the city, well... of course k

magera, he says , that in this case the law, it goes beyond the limits of the constitution, that is,at is, that according to the constitution there should not be such restrictions, that is, that here too the law is... which details excessively what can actually be, well, by the way, the law can be easily changed, yes, that is, 50 seconds, 226 votes, but here questions arise, including on legitimacy, although, if a political decision is made, then it will be carried out, there is no doubt here, there is no doubt, but it is really necessary, and my advice is not to read social media at night. thank you very much for participating, thank you for your comments, oleksiy gran, professor of political science at the kivomoghlyan academy, scientific director of the ilko kuchariv democratic initiatives foundation, was with us in touch, now they will tell me how much time i still have to say goodbye to you, so natalka didenko will tell us about the weather in ukraine tomorrow, and then we will meet again. synoptic greetings to all, dear ukrainians, dear viewers, we are starting today's hot meet

magera, a constitutionalist, and we talked about those times, about the document, and there is, by the way, a connection with today's present, if you like, the istanbul agreements and the declaration on state sovereignty, there are many interesting points here, do you mean neutrality, which was fixed in the declaration on the state, as we determined today, it is not fixed anywhere in ukrainian legislation, but it is in the declaration, there is no longer any, there is no longer a declaration anywhere. the intention has already ended, the constitution has already clearly defined the accession to nato, that is, the constitution is automatic, it is a legal document, a declaration of a more political one, and intentions are not the same as the position of the state, so today all people, who participated then, in those times, and we today, i managed to gather them together, and we put a bold dot, who opposes the issue of joining nato, he opposes the constitution. the country does not fulfill the constitution and that's all, period, no neutrality, nothing, as long as the goal, strategy, goal

magera. a socialist, and we talked about those times, about the document, and there is, by the way,nnection with today, the present, if you like, the istanbul agreements and the declaration about state sovereignty, there are a lot of interesting points of view here, you mean neutrality, which was fixed in the declaration on the state, as we determined today, it is not fixed anywhere in ukrainian legislation, but it is in the declaration, it is not, it is not anywhere anymore, the declaration already the intention is over, the constitution has already clearly defined. introduction to, that is, the constitution automatically, it is a legal document, a declaration of a more political one, and intentions are not the same as the position of the state, so today all the people who participated then in those days, and we today, i managed to gather them together, and we put a bold dot, who opposes the issue of joining nato, he opposes the constitution of ukraine, does not fulfill the constitution and everything, period, no neutrality... what, so far defined goal, strategy, goals, all officia