0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
parks we had head to colorado is serving a second term as governor. back in january he spoke before a joint session of the legislature and denver to discuss environmental issues, workforce development reproductive health plant care prior to become governor he was a member of congress. serving 10 years in the u.s. house of representatives. his speech is about an hour. [applause] [applause] [applause] >> it is my pleasure and honor to present to you the honorable jared polis and governor of the best state in the nation. colorado. [cheering] will be happy to know the escort came they did their job. i was not able to escape i tried between the first and second floor they fully contained me and did their job. speaker, president, majority leader, majority leader rodrigues, minority leader lynch, minority leader, lieutenant governor, treasurer young, attorney general weiser, secretary of state griswold, first gentleman reese, members of the state board of education, justices of the colorado supreme court tribal treasurer turtle, members of the cabinet, denve
parks we had head to colorado is serving a second term as governor. back in january he spoke before a joint session of the legislature and denver to discuss environmental issues, workforce development reproductive health plant care prior to become governor he was a member of congress. serving 10 years in the u.s. house of representatives. his speech is about an hour. [applause] [applause] [applause] >> it is my pleasure and honor to present to you the honorable jared polis and governor of...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
[applause] this work needs more money in colorado's pocket, a stronger economy, a more affordable colorado. as demonstrated by our healthy surplus in colorado, taxes are simply too high, income taxes, property taxes and state sales tax. signal at our own peril. at a challenge democrats and republicans to work together to improve our economic growth and success by not taking taxes that we can't keep anyway, and instead working on on a boldd balance and progressive package including cutting income tax rate.pa [applause] and while, and what we might not agree on everything related to tabor i want to talk with sub we can all agree on, coloradans tabor refunds mustnd remain free of federal taxes as they have for 30 years. [applause] and i want to thank senator bennet and others for this continuedrs work. we are close to working steadfast in her commitment to coloradans keep more of the hard-earned money. you know, when i first ran for governor i envisioned a colorado for all come when where everyone can thrive, and we are guided by that same mission today, no matter who you are, the matter the
[applause] this work needs more money in colorado's pocket, a stronger economy, a more affordable colorado. as demonstrated by our healthy surplus in colorado, taxes are simply too high, income taxes, property taxes and state sales tax. signal at our own peril. at a challenge democrats and republicans to work together to improve our economic growth and success by not taking taxes that we can't keep anyway, and instead working on on a boldd balance and progressive package including cutting...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
she's asking, what happens if colorado loses this case? colorado has postured this as an issue about whether trump's ineligibility to hold the office of president means that he is not qualified to be on their ballot. let's say that the court rules he can't stay on the ballot. he has to continue to be removed from the ballot. let's say there's an election. donald trump is elected. does that mean that there's chaos following the election where congress then is scrambling, trying to decide whether or not he is eligible? does that get thrown into the courts? i don't think any of these justices want to end up in that position. i think we will see them search for a rationale that decides the situation once and for all. there's that possibility they might conclude that the issue of eligibility can't be decided in this moment because congress has yet to act. that's deeply concerning for the future of the country. >> joyce, i was struck by it. i will ask our production team to go to sot 10. i kept thinking about the importance of representation and
she's asking, what happens if colorado loses this case? colorado has postured this as an issue about whether trump's ineligibility to hold the office of president means that he is not qualified to be on their ballot. let's say that the court rules he can't stay on the ballot. he has to continue to be removed from the ballot. let's say there's an election. donald trump is elected. does that mean that there's chaos following the election where congress then is scrambling, trying to decide whether...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
caller: i am from colorado. i don't think he needs to be on the ballot because i don't think it's fair. if he did that on january the sixth, i really don't think he needs to be running for president. because, no telling what would happen if he gets back into that white house. so that's my opinion. thank you. host: all right, amsterdam -- amsterdam, new york. good evening, go ahead, what are your thoughts on this case, did you get to listen today? caller: yes, it's very hard to take him off the ballot. as bad as it was when they removed mr. santos, he was never accused of anything either. or not found guilty of anything. it's up to the american people to vote. not for courts to decide who they can vote for or can vote against. to me, it's all politically related, republicans against democrats, whatever. this whole thing seems to be over this. they just want him off the ballot. other than that, i don't know what to tell you. host: that's what justice kavanaugh asked. he said, are you disenfranchising voters who wa
caller: i am from colorado. i don't think he needs to be on the ballot because i don't think it's fair. if he did that on january the sixth, i really don't think he needs to be running for president. because, no telling what would happen if he gets back into that white house. so that's my opinion. thank you. host: all right, amsterdam -- amsterdam, new york. good evening, go ahead, what are your thoughts on this case, did you get to listen today? caller: yes, it's very hard to take him off the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but why is colorado so afraid of voters?ohn, i think the problem with that question, which is a very good pointed question, is that what's colorado, because i think if you ask the people of colorado the consensus of those people would be we can be trusted to elect whoever we want to elect and we can, you know, evaluate donald trump without you having to take him off the ballot. it's this thin fringe progressive part of the government that's taking this step. >> sandra: andy, thank you so much for joining us on that. could you please stand by with us? because the breaking news is going to continue. awaiting a couple big live events. new york city, also the white house and karine jean-pierre. so we are going to take a quick break. we'll be right back. have grav', your eye symptoms could mean something more. that gritty feeling can't be brushed away. even a little blurry vision can distort things. and something serious may be behind those itchy eyes. up to 50% of people with graves' could develop a different condition called th
but why is colorado so afraid of voters?ohn, i think the problem with that question, which is a very good pointed question, is that what's colorado, because i think if you ask the people of colorado the consensus of those people would be we can be trusted to elect whoever we want to elect and we can, you know, evaluate donald trump without you having to take him off the ballot. it's this thin fringe progressive part of the government that's taking this step. >> sandra: andy, thank you so...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
trump's eligibility for office after six voters in colorado successfully sued to get him removed from the state's primary ballot but pointing to his actions on january 6th, and a provision in the 14th amendment insurrection or rebellion from holding pu that disqualifies those who engaged in insurrection or rebellion from holding public office again. >> the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power >> reporter: all nine justices -- both conservative and consequences colorado's argument. liberal -- appearing to bristle at the united states.eaching consequences of colorado's argument. >> the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. that seems quite extraordinary, doesn't it >> reporter: chief justice john roberts later raising the idea of the 14th amendment being used as a political weapon by democrats and republicans alike. >> it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pret
trump's eligibility for office after six voters in colorado successfully sued to get him removed from the state's primary ballot but pointing to his actions on january 6th, and a provision in the 14th amendment insurrection or rebellion from holding pu that disqualifies those who engaged in insurrection or rebellion from holding public office again. >> the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power >>...
0
0.0
Feb 14, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
before he worked there, he worked at the colorado puc for 2020 to 21. we are advising the commissioners. senior director of policy. the he supervises staff working across several functional areas. you should be here today to give us your wisdom. it also helps you regulate the electrical utilities are moving forward to the zone and businesses. moving forward, one of the biggest impacts from this reliability, is going to be the climate crisis. we need to be clear about the stakes. many of our colleagues have heard me say repeatedly, the climate crisis is existential. they have longer wildfire seasons, massive flooding, and colder temperatures throughout the window. on and on. a key component to the response of the climate crisis, is going to be the transition to leaner energy sources. they have different policies that these agencies develop. the witnesses represent clean energy deployment. this is directly from the short- term, including all of our futures in the long-term. the bipartisan infrastructure law, which we enacted in 2021, they are looking at t
before he worked there, he worked at the colorado puc for 2020 to 21. we are advising the commissioners. senior director of policy. the he supervises staff working across several functional areas. you should be here today to give us your wisdom. it also helps you regulate the electrical utilities are moving forward to the zone and businesses. moving forward, one of the biggest impacts from this reliability, is going to be the climate crisis. we need to be clear about the stakes. many of our...
131
131
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 131
favorite 0
quote 1
colorado's legislator specifically directed colorado's courts to resolve any challenges to the listing of any candidate on the presidential primary ballot before coloradans cast their votes. despite this law, petitioner contends that colorado must put him on the ballot because of the possibility there would be a super majority act of congress to remove his legal disability. under this theory, colorado and every other state would have to indulge this possibility, not just for the primary but through the general election and up to the moment that an ineligible candidate was sworn into office. nothing in the constitution strips the states of their power to direct presidential elections in this way. this case was handled capably and efficiently by the colorado courts under a process that we have used to decide ballot challenges for more than a century. and, as everyone agrees, the court now has the record that it needs to resolve these important issues. i welcome your questions. >> is there expressed provision that what a qualified candidate is. >> no, your honor. there is not expressed pr
colorado's legislator specifically directed colorado's courts to resolve any challenges to the listing of any candidate on the presidential primary ballot before coloradans cast their votes. despite this law, petitioner contends that colorado must put him on the ballot because of the possibility there would be a super majority act of congress to remove his legal disability. under this theory, colorado and every other state would have to indulge this possibility, not just for the primary but...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because as colorado voters admitted right from the start, and the colorado justice general knows, it's not about a due process question. there were claims from donald trump early on that his due process was violated. but that is not a core issue here. where it goes to is this idea about how any process would be -- when they take more globally about how one state could do this and then have it in for wisconsin, illinois, maine, whatever. but originally, when this case was first heard, trump forces felt like this five-day trial was not fair. one other thing i will mention about the general, the justices gave her time, they were not going to give -- usually it's just two parties. the secretary of state said, you know, we should really be in on this case. we know what colorado wants. they gave the solicitor general time. but boy, i don't know if you can tell, they had nothing to ask her. it was, like we are done. we are done. so it just shows that the train is moving and it's moving fast. >> yeah, we want to get a read on the missing man, as harry alluded in these arguments. let's go to we
because as colorado voters admitted right from the start, and the colorado justice general knows, it's not about a due process question. there were claims from donald trump early on that his due process was violated. but that is not a core issue here. where it goes to is this idea about how any process would be -- when they take more globally about how one state could do this and then have it in for wisconsin, illinois, maine, whatever. but originally, when this case was first heard, trump...
0
0.0
Feb 4, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the state of colorado under colorado law, determined that that donald trump's participation in the january 6th insurrection disqualifies him. under colorado law from being on the ballot. because colorado law is includes the constitution as part of its basic job description, its requirements for being on the presidential ballot in colorado. so are there other states? in addition to colorado that are struggling or dealing with this very issue? yes. there are many states actually across the country. most of the cases or many of the cases have resolved. and for various reasons, every state decides it differently. under their laws. and there still are a number of cases pending in states as large as texas that, in theory, could hold in a way consistent with colorado vo and potentially impact what happens in november. so now it's all on the steps of the supreme court. how would you expect this particular court to decide? i don't think the supreme court is going to deal with colorado law. i do think the supreme court's more likely to go head on into section three itself. so there are a number of q
the state of colorado under colorado law, determined that that donald trump's participation in the january 6th insurrection disqualifies him. under colorado law from being on the ballot. because colorado law is includes the constitution as part of its basic job description, its requirements for being on the presidential ballot in colorado. so are there other states? in addition to colorado that are struggling or dealing with this very issue? yes. there are many states actually across the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KDTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
¿o es sÓlo en colorado? de la amplitud de la decisiÓn, en el estado de colorado siguen la boleta porque estÁ en el proceso de apelaciÓn en la corte suprema, estÁ en realmente por el momento sigue habilitado en cada estado hasta que haya un fallo determinante o de cada estado dependen de la escisiÓn. borja: si la corte suprema habla solamente es de la decisiÓn de colorado? en colorado lo hicieron ahora yo tambiÉn lo puedo hacer. >> pudiera ser parece ser por los argumentos que estado escuchando, se estÁ inclinando la corte a una decisiÓn generalizada que tenga aplicaciÓn a los 50 estados, parte de lo que preocupa es que haya resultados distintos en base a distintas evidencias y distintos estados. carolina: considerando exactamente eso, que en noviembre se elige presidente de estados unidos. como siempre nos encanta que venga en vivo aquel estudio de la ediciÓn digital. borjas: jueves de la asamblea republicana en el estado de nevada, el letrado estatal tiene por segunda vez la oportunidad de votar por un prec
¿o es sÓlo en colorado? de la amplitud de la decisiÓn, en el estado de colorado siguen la boleta porque estÁ en el proceso de apelaciÓn en la corte suprema, estÁ en realmente por el momento sigue habilitado en cada estado hasta que haya un fallo determinante o de cada estado dependen de la escisiÓn. borja: si la corte suprema habla solamente es de la decisiÓn de colorado? en colorado lo hicieron ahora yo tambiÉn lo puedo hacer. >> pudiera ser parece ser por los argumentos que...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
as the secretary of state of colorado, we have colorado election law interest.will be defending our law. and going with the simple message tomorrow to the supreme court. states can rightfully disqualify oath-breaking insurrectionists, like donald trump, and that is perfectly within the confines of the constitution and federalism. >> i want to be clear here because i think i spoke to you before this all played out. and we spoke about this. and obviously this is on our radar screen because you're secretary of state. what's happened in colorado and the cases have been combined maine and colorado. what happened in colorado is different from maine. in maine the person who had your job made an administrative determination that donald trump qualified. in your case in colorado there was a trial, a sort of civil trial, right? there was a lawsuit and there was a trial with facts entered into evidence. are you -- are you sufficiently assured that there was enough process at that level for what is a monumental decision taken? >> absolutely. the trial court held five-day tri
as the secretary of state of colorado, we have colorado election law interest.will be defending our law. and going with the simple message tomorrow to the supreme court. states can rightfully disqualify oath-breaking insurrectionists, like donald trump, and that is perfectly within the confines of the constitution and federalism. >> i want to be clear here because i think i spoke to you before this all played out. and we spoke about this. and obviously this is on our radar screen because...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump's lawyer and the colorado voters and the lawyer for the colorado secretary of state. host: why the secretary of state? guest: i don't know. there are some issues of election law and she wants to have her say. the colorado voters oppose the secretary of state. i think she would only help trump if she throws m someuck in the works. the court usually hears from sovereign state on an issue like this. host: the role of the colorado secretary of state today? guest: i believe they got the 10 minutes because part of what the issue is at stake in this case are colorado's authority to determine ballot access and to adjudicate section three issues even in the absence of a congressional statute. it may also be a technical issue of colorado law. in general, the issues of colorado law, the color of supreme court is supposed to be the final authority on that. trump's lawyer has argued very on persuasively that the supreme court could somehow review some of the state law issues in this case and maybe the secretary of state perhaps is going to address that. host: about 15 minutes left
trump's lawyer and the colorado voters and the lawyer for the colorado secretary of state. host: why the secretary of state? guest: i don't know. there are some issues of election law and she wants to have her say. the colorado voters oppose the secretary of state. i think she would only help trump if she throws m someuck in the works. the court usually hears from sovereign state on an issue like this. host: the role of the colorado secretary of state today? guest: i believe they got the 10...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i want to thank you both and we heard what's wrong with the colorado argument.g to get in with the prosecutor why he thinks this was important to be brought to the court and why there is an argument excluding trump from the ballot. this is the first time they have weighed it in to donald trump's conduct. >> we haven't seen anything like january 6th since reconstruction. insurrection against the constitution is something extraordinary. . taste so deliciously fresh. with better nutrition, too. we love our eggs any style. as long as they're the best. eggland's best. (vo) welcome to lobsterfest. is your party ready? ready to attack this new lobster & shrimp stack? as long as they're the best. ready to get your mitts on lobster, shrimp and grits? they're two of ten lobster creations, only at lobsterfest. red lobster. is your party ready? you know, when i take the bike out like this, all my stresses just melt away. i hear that. this bad boy can fix anything. yep, tough day at work, nice cruise will sort you right out. when i'm riding, i'm not even thinking about my pa
i want to thank you both and we heard what's wrong with the colorado argument.g to get in with the prosecutor why he thinks this was important to be brought to the court and why there is an argument excluding trump from the ballot. this is the first time they have weighed it in to donald trump's conduct. >> we haven't seen anything like january 6th since reconstruction. insurrection against the constitution is something extraordinary. . taste so deliciously fresh. with better nutrition,...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the colorado voters today.e clerked for justice elena kagan on the supreme court and justice neil gorsuch when he was a denver-based u.s. circuit court of appeals. those are the men who will be leading the arguments. colorado solicitor general also granted 10 minutes to represent the colorado secretary of state in this case. you will be hearing all of this if you stick around on c-span after 10:00 eastern. cameras not allowed in the courtroom, but we will show you images of those who are speaking and let you hear the live oral arguments that are streamed live on the supreme court's website. these are the images you are seeing on your screen is the media gathering outside the supreme court. plenty of people there who have been waiting hours and days to try to be one of those who get into the supreme court to be in attendance to listen to the or arguments. -- to listen to the oral arguments. we will hopefully be chatting with some of those folks later in our program. until now chatting with our viewers. this is j
the colorado voters today.e clerked for justice elena kagan on the supreme court and justice neil gorsuch when he was a denver-based u.s. circuit court of appeals. those are the men who will be leading the arguments. colorado solicitor general also granted 10 minutes to represent the colorado secretary of state in this case. you will be hearing all of this if you stick around on c-span after 10:00 eastern. cameras not allowed in the courtroom, but we will show you images of those who are...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you have two active cases, colorado and maine. and then you have one, two, three, four, five, six, seven -- 11 others that are pending. if the court today rules against the plaintiffs from the state of colorado, what happens to the other cases? are they frozen, too, or do they continue? >> really depends how they rule. but it bears repeating that if the court does not rule in favor of the former president, i think it creates an untenable patchwork across this nation and will descend into chaos and how an election would work when millions of americans would be disen franchiseed for voting for the candidate of their choosing. i'm sure the supreme court is taking into consideration the political ramifications, the dangerous component to all of this should they not weigh in and create some kind of national decision that would apply with these states as well. >> dana: shannon, i wondered -- >> bill: if the one thing -- roll the david axelrod segment. we're in unison on this. listen to what he said this week about this case yesterday. >
you have two active cases, colorado and maine. and then you have one, two, three, four, five, six, seven -- 11 others that are pending. if the court today rules against the plaintiffs from the state of colorado, what happens to the other cases? are they frozen, too, or do they continue? >> really depends how they rule. but it bears repeating that if the court does not rule in favor of the former president, i think it creates an untenable patchwork across this nation and will descend into...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the state of colorado says no. >> i engaged in insurrection against the constitution. president trump, disqualified himself from public office. >> now, the u.s. supreme court will decide. >> we'll hear argument, case 23 7:19, trump versus anderson. >> tonight, donald trump battled to remain on the ballot for the 2024 presidential election. >> for an insurrection, there needs to be an organized concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. >> so your point is that a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> the colorado case, it's national implications. >> the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> and, dammed if you do, dammed if you don't predictions of chaos. either way >> members of this course have disagreed about that. >> i'm asking you -- >> tonight, jason, marie appeared live. the lawyer who argued today's case for colorado voters. joy reid, chris hayes, lawrence
the state of colorado says no. >> i engaged in insurrection against the constitution. president trump, disqualified himself from public office. >> now, the u.s. supreme court will decide. >> we'll hear argument, case 23 7:19, trump versus anderson. >> tonight, donald trump battled to remain on the ballot for the 2024 presidential election. >> for an insurrection, there needs to be an organized concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they seem to be looking for members in the polls for colorado.t to play some sound from justice jackson, in which she adjusted one of kavanaugh's talking points. take a listen. >> the thing that is really troubling to me is that i totally understand your argument. they were listing people that were barred, and the president isn't there. i think that makes me worried that they weren't focused on the president. the language doesn't include the president, why is that? if there is an ambiguity, why would be construe it as justice kavanaugh pointed out? against democracy. >> what is your response? >> i think that it's always a mistake to conclude from a particular question where the justices psyche or interpretation is. i think that she was trying to tease out the point. section three of the 14th amendment was meant in a categorical way to disqualify anybody who had participated in an insurrection of violence against the union, and previously had sworn an oath of office to hold office again. i think he was trying to get back -- that is part of a quest
they seem to be looking for members in the polls for colorado.t to play some sound from justice jackson, in which she adjusted one of kavanaugh's talking points. take a listen. >> the thing that is really troubling to me is that i totally understand your argument. they were listing people that were barred, and the president isn't there. i think that makes me worried that they weren't focused on the president. the language doesn't include the president, why is that? if there is an...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the colorado supreme court decision is wrong _ colorado supreme court decision is wrong and — coloradoion is wrong and should be reversed for numerous — wrong and should be reversed for numerous reasons. the first is that president _ numerous reasons. the first is that president trump is not covered by section— president trump is not covered by section three because the president is not _ section three because the president is not an_ section three because the president is not an officer of the united states— is not an officer of the united states as _ is not an officer of the united states as that term is used throughout the constitution. an officer— throughout the constitution. an officer of— throughout the constitution. an officer of the united states refers only to _ officer of the united states refers only to appointed officials and it does _ only to appointed officials and it does not — only to appointed officials and it does not encompass selected individuals such as the president or members _ individuals such as the president or members of congress. this is clear from _ members
the colorado supreme court decision is wrong _ colorado supreme court decision is wrong and — coloradoion is wrong and should be reversed for numerous — wrong and should be reversed for numerous reasons. the first is that president _ numerous reasons. the first is that president trump is not covered by section— president trump is not covered by section three because the president is not _ section three because the president is not an_ section three because the president is not an officer...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you already have a colorado supreme court and a colorado district court talking about this.ou had an impeachment pros bez this very thing, but you don't have a criminal charge against trump for inrex. you don't have -- for the cases that jack smith is right now, part of it and the impeachment against him did not result in a conviction so i'll be curious to see if the supreme court of the united states wants to wade into this. >> steve? >> yeah, oral arguments in the supreme court, jake, are so often about the justices talking to each other and talking to each other through the advocates, talking to each other through the questions they are asking. in addition to what laura says, to what elie said, i'm interested in how do the justices from across the ideological spectrum actually communicate with each other during the oral target? do we see justice kagan trying to pick up on questions asked by jeff justice roberts or kavanaugh? do we see justice gorsuch ping on questions asked by george sotomayor. if the court is going to find a consensus way through the question it seems li
you already have a colorado supreme court and a colorado district court talking about this.ou had an impeachment pros bez this very thing, but you don't have a criminal charge against trump for inrex. you don't have -- for the cases that jack smith is right now, part of it and the impeachment against him did not result in a conviction so i'll be curious to see if the supreme court of the united states wants to wade into this. >> steve? >> yeah, oral arguments in the supreme court,...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
will trump's name be on the ballot in colorado? >> i think joan is right.olf, it was the very last question of the 53-minute argument by trump's lawyer that was directed to the underlying -- did donald trump engage in insurrection? that it took that long tells you where the court is going. it's not just what the court does in this case, but as early as next week, they'll have the other case about whether the prosecution of donald trump here in d.c. can go forward or whether he was immunity. will the court see these cases as a way to split the difference. keep him on the ballot, but let the prosecution go forth in d.c. and just let the voters sort it out? >> we will find out fairly soon. carrie, were you surprised that even the liberal justices were supportive of keeping him on the ballot? >> the colorado supreme court was really the outlier here, and there were a number of findings the supreme court needed to take to get to. they would have had to accept so many different arguments. i think what was revealed through some of their questions today, is that th
will trump's name be on the ballot in colorado? >> i think joan is right.olf, it was the very last question of the 53-minute argument by trump's lawyer that was directed to the underlying -- did donald trump engage in insurrection? that it took that long tells you where the court is going. it's not just what the court does in this case, but as early as next week, they'll have the other case about whether the prosecution of donald trump here in d.c. can go forward or whether he was...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
impacts well beyond colorado.o his removal in states around the country in putting not only his political future on the line, but also in the case of if he were to be convicted of federal charges, potentially his inability to self-pardon himself after november. and so for donald trump and his team, there is a lot at stake in those 40 minutes in which they will be going before the supreme court tomorrow morning. >> thanks so much, vaughn hillyard, for setting the stage for us. lisa, what do you see as the keys for this case, for either side and just how complicated could it all again? >> well, i mean, there are a number of interpretive issues constitutionally that will come up tomorrow, but there are also some more fundamental issues too. for example, whether or not former president trump engaged in an insurrection is one part on interpretive issue, right? because it's in the constitutional text. it also involves a wing of facts. traditionally, the supreme court is deferential to the fact finder. they only reverse
impacts well beyond colorado.o his removal in states around the country in putting not only his political future on the line, but also in the case of if he were to be convicted of federal charges, potentially his inability to self-pardon himself after november. and so for donald trump and his team, there is a lot at stake in those 40 minutes in which they will be going before the supreme court tomorrow morning. >> thanks so much, vaughn hillyard, for setting the stage for us. lisa, what...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because the colorado supreme court decision was just not defended today.d all about the risks and forming the colorado supreme court decision, we heard precious about the risk of rejecting it. that is what this 14th amendment is all about. forged after the civil war to try to make sure that no insurrectionist would ever hold high office, and the risk that our country came together and understood that would have been. we just didn't hear anything like that. you didn't hear about the risk of donald trump treating this 14th amendment precious language like the tax code, looking for a loophole here, and a loophole there. that's what he's trying to do. we didn't hear anything about why this is actually consistent with our democratic values. and excluding insurrectionists from the ballot just as we exclude other people from the ballot who do not meet the qualifications for office. unfortunately the supreme court has a very distorted picture. or i am sure that they have court briefs. but unfortunately, those were not even highlighted today either. >> i heard you
because the colorado supreme court decision was just not defended today.d all about the risks and forming the colorado supreme court decision, we heard precious about the risk of rejecting it. that is what this 14th amendment is all about. forged after the civil war to try to make sure that no insurrectionist would ever hold high office, and the risk that our country came together and understood that would have been. we just didn't hear anything like that. you didn't hear about the risk of...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
whether colorado had used the right procedures. the argument that justice alito is making, there it is related to an argument chief justice roberts made at another time which was what happens with other states? do other states feel they are bound by colorado and they have to throw trump off the ballot? that is what alito meant by collateral. justice chief roberts made the, point what happens when red states start to throw biden off the ballot? is that the kind of arms ways we want? i thought maybe justice sotomayor votes for colorado, but it looked like a -- and what it means in real terms, is donald trump is going to be on the ballot in 50 states period. >> and that is the gist of it. i think it is important that this decision come down quickly, but more important that the question over presidential immunity comes down quickly. i think that the country is in a bit of denial we are having the rematch that nobody wants, seven in ten americans did not want a trump versus biden rematch, but that is the simple reality right now. voters
whether colorado had used the right procedures. the argument that justice alito is making, there it is related to an argument chief justice roberts made at another time which was what happens with other states? do other states feel they are bound by colorado and they have to throw trump off the ballot? that is what alito meant by collateral. justice chief roberts made the, point what happens when red states start to throw biden off the ballot? is that the kind of arms ways we want? i thought...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
colorado secretary of state jena griswold joins me next. maybe she can help make sense of all of it. "the reidout" continues after this. i know what it's like to perform through pain. if you're like me, one of the millions suffering from pain caused by migraine, nurtec odt may help. it's the only medication that can treat a migraine when it strikes and prevent migraine attacks. treat and prevent, all in one. don't take if allergic to nurtec. allergic reactions can occur, even days after using. most common side effects were nausea, indigestion, and stomach pain. relief is possible. talk to a doctor about nurtec odt. i'm daniel lurie relief is possible. and i've spent my career fighting poverty, helping people right here in san francisco. i'm also a father raising two kids in the city. deeply concerned that city hall is allowing crime and lawlessness to spread. now we can do something about it by voting yes on prop e. a common sense solution that ensures we use community safety cameras to catch repeat offenders and hold them accountable. vote
colorado secretary of state jena griswold joins me next. maybe she can help make sense of all of it. "the reidout" continues after this. i know what it's like to perform through pain. if you're like me, one of the millions suffering from pain caused by migraine, nurtec odt may help. it's the only medication that can treat a migraine when it strikes and prevent migraine attacks. treat and prevent, all in one. don't take if allergic to nurtec. allergic reactions can occur, even days...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
murray who was representingaw t colorado voters. i would say we've all heard a lot of oral arguments. i don't know this was the most confident oral argument we've ever coheard, and it felt there wered times when all the justis including sanchez and kagen who he has clerked for were almost frustrated they weren't able to getle straight answers out of h, he at several points declined to answer the question that had been asked, wanting instead to answer something else. even in that exchange with jackson it was hard to tell whether or not that was something she truly believed or she felt this was not a great argument mades by the trump lawyers. if you listen to the argument with the trump lawyer, with mr. mitchell, it was clear amy coney barrett and others were saying this is a ridiculous argument, of course the president is an officer under the constitution. it's almost -- so you could also interpret it to mean she was just trying to get out of him a cogent argument, shoot down this thing we were just skeptical of. you just heard many,
murray who was representingaw t colorado voters. i would say we've all heard a lot of oral arguments. i don't know this was the most confident oral argument we've ever coheard, and it felt there wered times when all the justis including sanchez and kagen who he has clerked for were almost frustrated they weren't able to getle straight answers out of h, he at several points declined to answer the question that had been asked, wanting instead to answer something else. even in that exchange with...
0
0.0
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
donald trump appealing the colorado supreme court ruling finding that under the 14th amendment, trump can be barred from the ballot for his role in the january 6th attack on the u.s. capitol. the justices now at the nation's highest court tonight appearing unlikely to keep trump off the ballot. terry moran at the court. >> reporter: at the supreme court today, sharp skepticism from the justices -- both conservative and liberal -- about a colorado court's decision to ban donald trump from the 2024 presidential ballot for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including the january 6th attack on the capitol. the colorado court ruled trump violated the 14th amendment's section three, which declares that no one who has -- "taken an oath to support the constitution" and then "engaged in insurrection" can hold public office afterwards. during three hours of oral arguments today, the justices methodically took apart that ruling. justice brett kavanagh, trump appointee -- >> what about the idea that we should think about democracy, think about the right of the people to elect candidates o
donald trump appealing the colorado supreme court ruling finding that under the 14th amendment, trump can be barred from the ballot for his role in the january 6th attack on the u.s. capitol. the justices now at the nation's highest court tonight appearing unlikely to keep trump off the ballot. terry moran at the court. >> reporter: at the supreme court today, sharp skepticism from the justices -- both conservative and liberal -- about a colorado court's decision to ban donald trump from...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
by the colorado solicitor general who today, also defended colorado taking trump off of the ballot. >> the petitioner contends that colorado must put him on the ballot because of the possibility that there would be a supermajority act of congress to remove his legal disability. under this theory, colorado and every other state would have to indulge this possibility, not just for the primary but through the general election and up to the moment that ineligible candidate was sworn into office. nothing in the constitution strips the states have their power to direct presidential elections in this way. >> in other words, do not make us do this. in other words, dear justices, rule that he is eligible for office, but do not force a situation in which he must be allowed to run, but he might not be allowed to serve if he is elected. if you thought last january 6th was bad, just wait to see what he did lead for the next one if we followed this course. here is chief justice, john roberts tonight. >> counsel, what if somebody came into a state secretary of state's office, and said i took the oat
by the colorado solicitor general who today, also defended colorado taking trump off of the ballot. >> the petitioner contends that colorado must put him on the ballot because of the possibility that there would be a supermajority act of congress to remove his legal disability. under this theory, colorado and every other state would have to indulge this possibility, not just for the primary but through the general election and up to the moment that ineligible candidate was sworn into...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the colorado state supreme court gave them what i think will be an easy out.iminal aspect of what trump has been accused of, which is an ongoing investigation by prosecutor jack smith, and i think the court is much more equipped to deal with that kind of decision, which of course is embedded in politics, but it's a whole lot clearer. the other thing that is troubling me is particularly with the main secretary of state is, i'm not sure the courts have a right to take away a party's ability to nominate who they want. now, parties might have every right to nominate someone who ultimately won't be qualified for the ballot. but donald trump, remember, a lot of people went to jail over the january 6th -- i call it an insurrection because that's what ted cruz called it, and he's a smart guy. he's retracted that since. i don't know if it's any other definition. it was an attempt, as botched as it was, and meaningless as it was, if they got in and stopped the proceeding, which they did initially, it wasn't going to change the outcome. joe biden was elected. dually elec
the colorado state supreme court gave them what i think will be an easy out.iminal aspect of what trump has been accused of, which is an ongoing investigation by prosecutor jack smith, and i think the court is much more equipped to deal with that kind of decision, which of course is embedded in politics, but it's a whole lot clearer. the other thing that is troubling me is particularly with the main secretary of state is, i'm not sure the courts have a right to take away a party's ability to...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and colorado says that in the state of colorado, it is the citizens _ state of colorado, it is the citizens outcome of this entire election by taking _ the outcome of this entire election by taking a — the outcome of this entire election by taking a presidential candidate off the _ by taking a presidential candidate off the state, it could turn an entire — off the state, it could turn an entire presidential election. that's was fascinating, _ entire presidential election. that's was fascinating, if _ entire presidential election. that's was fascinating, if you _ entire presidential election. that's was fascinating, if you look - entire presidential election. that's was fascinating, if you look at - entire presidential election. that's was fascinating, if you look at the | was fascinating, if you look at the previous judgements the supreme court has weighed in on, they tend to refer to the individual states. in in this case, they would be saying that colorado doesn't get to choose who goes on the ballot on the presidential election. but i'm worried about what donald trump says — can you see
and colorado says that in the state of colorado, it is the citizens _ state of colorado, it is the citizens outcome of this entire election by taking _ the outcome of this entire election by taking a — the outcome of this entire election by taking a presidential candidate off the _ by taking a presidential candidate off the state, it could turn an entire — off the state, it could turn an entire presidential election. that's was fascinating, _ entire presidential election. that's was...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> the colorado supreme court, its decision is going to be overturned.e only question is going to be by how much and on precisely what grounds. there are a number of ways they can do it. they can say the provision is not self-executing, congress 6 and 3 of the 14th amendment which is the key section congress has to allow for this and they haven't except in the criminal statute for insurrection. they can decide it that way. they can decide we are not going to have a bunch of different states deciding this question, we are not going to let the states decide it at all and talking about term limits case which says the state cannot put an extra qualification on the presidency that isn't in the constitution, section 3 says congress can waive somebody who engages in insurrection in the argument is this only applies to somebody holding office, he hasn't been elected yet so there are a number of ways it can go but colorado is going to be reversed, that i can pretty much guarantee. stuart: great seeing you again. in the meantime, wall street really focused on othe
>> the colorado supreme court, its decision is going to be overturned.e only question is going to be by how much and on precisely what grounds. there are a number of ways they can do it. they can say the provision is not self-executing, congress 6 and 3 of the 14th amendment which is the key section congress has to allow for this and they haven't except in the criminal statute for insurrection. they can decide it that way. they can decide we are not going to have a bunch of different...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KDTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
pedro: colorado fue representado. la jueza dispuso la posiciÓn de trump expresada por mitchell.se indica que nadie podrÁ ocupar un cargo pÚblico si ha participado en una insurrecciÓn o rebeliÓn contra los estados unidos. mitchell agregÓ que esta enmienda no menciona el cargo del presidente y que este mandatario tampoco ha sido condenado. cuando hablÓ el abogado de colorado la jueza reiterÓ que la enmienda no incluye la palabra presidente. [habla en inglÉs] pedro: el abogado o experto en la corte suprema dice que es altamente probable que trump gane por el lenguaje de la enmienda. >> no es auto ejecutable, es decir que los estados no la pueden implementar sin un acto del congreso. pedro: tan pronto terminÓ la audiencia en la corte suprema el expresidente trump de alguna manera celebrÓ lo que a su juicio escuchÓ de parte de los argumentos legales. fue un acto muy hermoso en muchos aspectos, dijo trump, y culpÓ a la casa blanca y el departamento de justicia de confabularse en su contra. el abogado dice que cree que es posible que se emita una decisiÓn en semanas. eliÁn: los votante
pedro: colorado fue representado. la jueza dispuso la posiciÓn de trump expresada por mitchell.se indica que nadie podrÁ ocupar un cargo pÚblico si ha participado en una insurrecciÓn o rebeliÓn contra los estados unidos. mitchell agregÓ que esta enmienda no menciona el cargo del presidente y que este mandatario tampoco ha sido condenado. cuando hablÓ el abogado de colorado la jueza reiterÓ que la enmienda no incluye la palabra presidente. [habla en inglÉs] pedro: el abogado o experto...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
did not go well for colorado.he key votes are justice jackson and justice cag for different reasons talking about well is the president even covered by this clause in the 14th amendment and justice kagan pointed out that if we left up the qualification question to the states, the result would be chaos. it's a national question that deserves a national answer. i think we're looking at an 8-1 decision in donald trump's favor. >> bret: and some experts saying maybe 9-0 to try to, you know, john roberts would really push for that, the chief justice, bill. here is a little clip from the cag q&a. >> justice kagan: if they can put most boldly i think that the question you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> bret: bill, thoughts? >> yeah, the supreme court is one of the few institutions in washington still doing its job. this is really not a close case as a frothy reception to colorado's arguments showed. if they rule for colorado, not only do they open th
did not go well for colorado.he key votes are justice jackson and justice cag for different reasons talking about well is the president even covered by this clause in the 14th amendment and justice kagan pointed out that if we left up the qualification question to the states, the result would be chaos. it's a national question that deserves a national answer. i think we're looking at an 8-1 decision in donald trump's favor. >> bret: and some experts saying maybe 9-0 to try to, you know,...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what colorado supreme court has done in similar. under section three president trump needs to qualify during the time he holds office. the colorado supreme court is saying you have to show that you would qualify under section three now at the time of the election or at the time we the state supreme court. >> a point of clarification. when you say term limits. the decision in the term limits case, constitutional provision governing term limits. >> maybe i should call it thornton instead of term limits. >> does it have something to do with the fact that the particular circumstance you are talking about can change? is that what you mean? i'm trying to understand the distinction between the provision in the constitution that relates to disqualification on the basis of insurrection behavior, and these other provisions that justice sotomayor points out. they all seem to me to be extent constitutional requirements. so -- but you are drawing a distinction. >> whether or not -- >> it is not categorical. congress can lift the disability by a
what colorado supreme court has done in similar. under section three president trump needs to qualify during the time he holds office. the colorado supreme court is saying you have to show that you would qualify under section three now at the time of the election or at the time we the state supreme court. >> a point of clarification. when you say term limits. the decision in the term limits case, constitutional provision governing term limits. >> maybe i should call it thornton...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is it a judge in colorado? that's a matter of due process to get notice of what the charges are, all of those things. as a matter of process, it's an easy case. libertarian ought to hope it's overturned. >> i find this a fascinating argument. when you talk about enforcement, there's section 5. we will see how that plays out. congress is the one that has the power to enforce. that would be against the argument of self-execution. the other thing that's interesting to me is the colorado supreme court had a finding of law. but then they had a finding of fact. it was he did engage in an insurrection. do you think the supreme court takes up that argument at all, that this was or wasn't engaging in an insurrection? do they bypass that? >> very interesting question. a great question. all of yours always are. first of all, what troubles me most in the colorado decision about the finding of fact is that it relied on the january 6 committee report. i feel strongly that committee is a partisan committee that was ethically
is it a judge in colorado? that's a matter of due process to get notice of what the charges are, all of those things. as a matter of process, it's an easy case. libertarian ought to hope it's overturned. >> i find this a fascinating argument. when you talk about enforcement, there's section 5. we will see how that plays out. congress is the one that has the power to enforce. that would be against the argument of self-execution. the other thing that's interesting to me is the colorado...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there was a five-day trial before a district judge in colorado.that judge ruled donald trump did engage in insurrection. there's an extensive fact record here that the supreme court can rely on. but that judge decided in the end that donald trump could be on the ballot, that this provision in the 14th amendment did not apply to him, but then the colorado supreme court later upheld the insurrection portion but reversed and decided that, in fact, mr. trump should be excluded from the ballot. so today the supreme court is going to hear from attorneys for six coloradans who brought this case led by a 91-year-old former republican member of the legislature. the supreme court will also hear from lawyers for the colorado secretary of state, and then of course from mr. trump's attorneys who argue that any move to keep him off the ballot would disenfranchise millions of voters and they also say it could cause bedlam in the united states, which the opponents seized on in their briefs and said that is a veiled threat. we've seen the kind of bedlam in the wor
there was a five-day trial before a district judge in colorado.that judge ruled donald trump did engage in insurrection. there's an extensive fact record here that the supreme court can rely on. but that judge decided in the end that donald trump could be on the ballot, that this provision in the 14th amendment did not apply to him, but then the colorado supreme court later upheld the insurrection portion but reversed and decided that, in fact, mr. trump should be excluded from the ballot. so...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but the lawyer for colorado, and then after him the colorado solicitor general, and an answer for thatying basically, hey, states decide who gets on the ballot all the time. that's the system. it's not at all uncommon for different states to have different candidates listed for the same election. some smaller party candidates get, on not others. some are kept off eligibility concerns the some states take more seriously than others. it happens. the supreme court can give guidance to make it more uniform, but the states can handle this. the colorado solicitor general, speaking on the same point just moments later said there is a huge amount of disparity and candidates end up on the ballot in different states and every election. just this election, she said, it a candidate to colorado excluded from the primary ballot, who was on the ballot in other states, even though he's not a natural born citizen. that is just a feature of our process. it is not above it. so there's an answer to this concern we just heard jason murray who had an answer to it a few moments ago. when the justices ex expr
but the lawyer for colorado, and then after him the colorado solicitor general, and an answer for thatying basically, hey, states decide who gets on the ballot all the time. that's the system. it's not at all uncommon for different states to have different candidates listed for the same election. some smaller party candidates get, on not others. some are kept off eligibility concerns the some states take more seriously than others. it happens. the supreme court can give guidance to make it more...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
colorado's decision? >> absolutely. you heard questions whether from justice kagan, multiple questions from the liberal justices who are likely i believe this could be a 9-0, 8-1 or 7-2 case. >> the next thing that the supreme court could take up is the question of donald trump's argument, assertion of presidential immunity. if you trust the supreme court's decision on the 14th amendment, will you accept what they decide on presidential immunity as well? >> certainly. i will have something to say when the court makes that decision. i have put out a public statement of course the president has presidential immunity. you can't handcuff a sitting president of the united states for future presidents to go after them. it wouldn't allow them do their job in their official capacity. that was a wrong headed decision. i expect the supreme court will overturn that as well. >> appeals court decision. does that extend to president biden? do you think he can do whatever ant not get prosecuted as well? >> the trump campaign said this
colorado's decision? >> absolutely. you heard questions whether from justice kagan, multiple questions from the liberal justices who are likely i believe this could be a 9-0, 8-1 or 7-2 case. >> the next thing that the supreme court could take up is the question of donald trump's argument, assertion of presidential immunity. if you trust the supreme court's decision on the 14th amendment, will you accept what they decide on presidential immunity as well? >> certainly. i will...
0
0.0
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in colorado other 36% of the land is federally owned. in mesa county, an astonishing 72% of the land is owned by the federal government this presents many local challenges. as communities grow in proximity to federal lands, there simply is not enough space for new home, school, hospitals or other necessities to sustain a growing population. large swaths of federal land limit the tax base to support the local community. while creative solutions have been enacted by congress to address the issue, there are still setbacks to communities lacking a strong tax base. the growing population in this colorado community has encouraged county leaders to speak out -- to seek out new land for development. the land in question is on the bureau's disposal list, meaning the agency has democratted it no longer wants to manage the land and the land does not serve the taxpayers' interest. while both the bureau of land management and may ka county are supportive of this land exchange, the process has continued to run into bureaucrat i think delays. mesa coun
in colorado other 36% of the land is federally owned. in mesa county, an astonishing 72% of the land is owned by the federal government this presents many local challenges. as communities grow in proximity to federal lands, there simply is not enough space for new home, school, hospitals or other necessities to sustain a growing population. large swaths of federal land limit the tax base to support the local community. while creative solutions have been enacted by congress to address the issue,...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if they uphold colorado's disqualification, he'll be off the ballot in colorado. they're opening the door for other states. they should see maine, illinois, other states that have said we're going to wait and see what the supreme court says. if they rule in colorado's favor, they are almost ensuring they're going to get a whole bunch of other challenges. on the other hand, if they strike down what colorado did, if they do it in a certain way, either the president does not koucht under the 14th amendment, or if they say congress must act first, then they put an iend to it. >> justice ka etanji brown jackn has the most experience. what will you be listening for? >> sure. our audience will get a very nice window into president biden's first appointee, can he tan gi brown jackson who kay on in 2022 but after she had been on a trial court and d.c. circuit. when she was on a trial court she presided over the early january 6th cases. and just for a couple of monls, but she had a chancee face to face the consequences of that attack and the people who were involved in it.
if they uphold colorado's disqualification, he'll be off the ballot in colorado. they're opening the door for other states. they should see maine, illinois, other states that have said we're going to wait and see what the supreme court says. if they rule in colorado's favor, they are almost ensuring they're going to get a whole bunch of other challenges. on the other hand, if they strike down what colorado did, if they do it in a certain way, either the president does not koucht under the 14th...
0
0.0
Feb 3, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the colorado secretary of state is now out front. secretary, i'm so glad to see you again. obviously all eyes are going to be on your lawyers this coming thursday when they're making your arguments to the justice. and that's not a lot of time. i know you wanted 15 minutes, so it's not as if you were asking for a lot, but you only have 10 minutes to make the case. what are they going to lay out before the supreme court? >> first off, erin, always great to be on your show. thank you for having me. and our message is pretty simple. it's the idea, the clear statement that states can stop oath breaking insurrectionists from appearing on our ballots. i imagine that the supreme court may focus its questions on the role of state law and how the constitution interacts with state law. and regardless of the time, we want to make sure that colorado's interests in our election system and election law is clearly protected at the united states supreme court. >> so secretary griswold, just to be clear you've been very careful on this issue. you didn't just come out and pound the table on t
and the colorado secretary of state is now out front. secretary, i'm so glad to see you again. obviously all eyes are going to be on your lawyers this coming thursday when they're making your arguments to the justice. and that's not a lot of time. i know you wanted 15 minutes, so it's not as if you were asking for a lot, but you only have 10 minutes to make the case. what are they going to lay out before the supreme court? >> first off, erin, always great to be on your show. thank you for...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he has yet to accept that he lost. >> and donna crew filed this colorado lawsuit. you heard the supreme court justices earlier today. are you satisfied with how jason murray represented your cause and do you see any scenario where you get the verdict you want? >> first, i'm absolutely satisfied with his performance. the justices asked tough questions in part because we have asked them to make a historic decision. not just for norma and the voters that we represent, but for the republican voters of colorado and perhaps the nation. so it wasn't surprising that both sides got skeptical and incisive questions but certainly, the stakes are higher on you know, if we prevail. and so it's not surprising that the justices had tougher questions for jason, which i thought he handled ably. >> lots of legal analysts think the other side is going to win and i'm wondering if you share that opinion or if you, if hope springs eternal for your side. >> i always wait till the end. because i can't guess an outcome. every time i try, i'm wrong. >> what about the argument that, i'm not
he has yet to accept that he lost. >> and donna crew filed this colorado lawsuit. you heard the supreme court justices earlier today. are you satisfied with how jason murray represented your cause and do you see any scenario where you get the verdict you want? >> first, i'm absolutely satisfied with his performance. the justices asked tough questions in part because we have asked them to make a historic decision. not just for norma and the voters that we represent, but for the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
today's case, we just heard, centers around colorado's attempt to bar mr.mp from the ballot for several other states have tried to do the same thing. in december, michigan's supreme court blocked an effort to keep him off the ballot and earlier, i spoke to michigan secretary of state, a democrat. sec., michigan supreme court had rejected an appeal that would have kept donald trump off the ballot. we spoke in december and you were clear back then when you spoke to us that you did not think secretaries of state should be ruling on this -- on the eligibility of a candidate on this specific question. i'm sure you are watching the hearing closely today. i want to get your take on what you thought of what you saw or heard. >> thanks for having me. i was in the courtroom today, listening to the justices and i was gratified to hear and see a lot of recognition from all of the justices of the importance of unanimity and conformity and clarity on a federal issue such as this. justice roberts in particular talked about the perils of allowing different states to make d
today's case, we just heard, centers around colorado's attempt to bar mr.mp from the ballot for several other states have tried to do the same thing. in december, michigan's supreme court blocked an effort to keep him off the ballot and earlier, i spoke to michigan secretary of state, a democrat. sec., michigan supreme court had rejected an appeal that would have kept donald trump off the ballot. we spoke in december and you were clear back then when you spoke to us that you did not think...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
back at the oral argument from colorado.his is about two hours. >> all rise. the supreme court of the state of colorado is now in session. >> you may be seated. thank you. all right, welcome everybody. before we start, i want to acknowledge, obviously we have read the briefs and there are a lot of strong opinions in the case on both sides. i want to remind everyone we expect appropriate decorum in the courtroom. if you feel you cannot maintain your composure, please step out, and come back in when you are ready. we certainly do not want to escort anybody out so we appreciate your professionalism. with that, the court will call anderson versus griswold and intervener republican committee and donald j. trump. counsel, you will enter your -- your appearances at the podium so we know who is speaking. >> i'd appreciate it. good afternoon. your honors, jason murray for petitioners and i will be handling for 20 minutes the issues presented in petitioners, affirmative appeal. >> all right. thank you. good afternoon. >> your honors,
back at the oral argument from colorado.his is about two hours. >> all rise. the supreme court of the state of colorado is now in session. >> you may be seated. thank you. all right, welcome everybody. before we start, i want to acknowledge, obviously we have read the briefs and there are a lot of strong opinions in the case on both sides. i want to remind everyone we expect appropriate decorum in the courtroom. if you feel you cannot maintain your composure, please step out, and...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but instead, donald trump will stay on the ballot in colorado.r the decision, given the view of the supreme court, which ian is not alone in, questioning it. could a lopsided decision be helpful? >> oh, i think so. i think it's a very salvy question, chris. americans generally are losing faith in our institutions. not just the supreme court. academia, media, congress, big business, and i think that's deeply unfortunate, and perhaps dangerous trend. so if you permit me a little bit of history. >> sure. >> 1954, of course, the supreme court unanimously desegregated schools in brown v. board of education. i think that 9-0 decision sent a very powerful message to the country, even though there was still massive resistance. a very powerful message. in 1973, we're coming out of a very divisive period, vietnam, watergate, nixon is still president, and he's subpoenaed for his white house documents and tapes. and by a 9-0 decision again, the supreme court required him to turn those over to the special prosecutor. that 9-0 decision, by the way, included fo
but instead, donald trump will stay on the ballot in colorado.r the decision, given the view of the supreme court, which ian is not alone in, questioning it. could a lopsided decision be helpful? >> oh, i think so. i think it's a very salvy question, chris. americans generally are losing faith in our institutions. not just the supreme court. academia, media, congress, big business, and i think that's deeply unfortunate, and perhaps dangerous trend. so if you permit me a little bit of...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> but this case could have consequences far beyond colorado.'s andrea fujii explains. >> this morning history unfolding at the supreme court. justices will hear oral arguments over whether former president trump can be kicked off the ballot in colorado. >> if the supreme court were to hold that donald trump cannot appear on colorado's ballot, it will mean that donald trump will not appear on any ballot in the country in the 2024 election, colorado took trump off the ballot in december, claiming he engaged in insurrection against the united states on january 6th, violating section three of the 14th amendment, a civil wartime amendment which bars certain people from holding office if they engage in insurrection or rebellion or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. >> the exact wording of the amendment will be under scrutiny today because it does not specifically mention the president, only officer of the government. trump and his lawyers argue the amendment does not apply to the president because he's not an officer of the government. >> t
>> but this case could have consequences far beyond colorado.'s andrea fujii explains. >> this morning history unfolding at the supreme court. justices will hear oral arguments over whether former president trump can be kicked off the ballot in colorado. >> if the supreme court were to hold that donald trump cannot appear on colorado's ballot, it will mean that donald trump will not appear on any ballot in the country in the 2024 election, colorado took trump off the ballot in...