0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
getting to the supreme court. the reason is because they did not want a black female conservative justice on the court. host: on making the court political, it is a question that is not unique to this time. it is certainly a question that has come up over time. do you think, in a day and age where justices have more access to the media, social media, do you think the justices do a good job today, or a better job today, of staying above the political fray for protecting that image of not being political? do you think they do that well today? was there a time in the past you think they did that better? caller: i mean, i do trust the court today. as far as that, i think it is very difficult to try to do that. but i think they are doing a fairly decent job, some of them are, anyway. do not see amy coney barrett out ther much talking. -- out there much, talking. you do not see kavanaugh. i just want to make one point. progressive judges do not put the law first. the point here is that judge in illinois last week, georg
getting to the supreme court. the reason is because they did not want a black female conservative justice on the court. host: on making the court political, it is a question that is not unique to this time. it is certainly a question that has come up over time. do you think, in a day and age where justices have more access to the media, social media, do you think the justices do a good job today, or a better job today, of staying above the political fray for protecting that image of not being...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court said supreme court ruled i am not an insurrectionist, that i engaged in peaceful behavior on january 6th. the court did pointedly -- nowhere in my quick skim so far, and it's only been a few minutes, did the court accept any of that. they rather ruled on a more technical ground. this is a sweeping victory in the sense that trump will remain on the ballot in colorado and other states we can expect, but it is not clearing him of the january 6th charges. that's, of course, separate action that the supreme court took last week to try and delay his january 6th trial while they decide the question of whether he's absolutely immune. so bottom line, a good day for donald trump. not a great day in the sense he's not cleared of january 6th, but he can remain on the ballot. >> so neal, if i'm understanding you correctly, that being said on the insurrection question and whether trump engaged in an insurrection, could the supreme court eventually have to answer that? why wouldn't they have gone into that issue which is sort of the meaty part of this case? >> well, i think one of the wa
supreme court said supreme court ruled i am not an insurrectionist, that i engaged in peaceful behavior on january 6th. the court did pointedly -- nowhere in my quick skim so far, and it's only been a few minutes, did the court accept any of that. they rather ruled on a more technical ground. this is a sweeping victory in the sense that trump will remain on the ballot in colorado and other states we can expect, but it is not clearing him of the january 6th charges. that's, of course, separate...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and there's a lot of discussion among people who follow the supreme court and think about the supreme court about the different in that kind background compared to the background of today's justices. well, when you think about some of the cases we'll momentarily which become so strikingly contradict in ways you mentioned one it's it's interesting to wonder about what that experience brought as well their very large personality is of some of them i think it's interesting you put the four in the and the four because there seem to the ones who are very quiet, you don't see in the news and then the ones who are constantly in the press or at least engage in sort of, say, rivalries. well, that's a very, very interesting point about the fdr justices. so we were talking about the number that he had appointed, you know, seven of the nine appointed and eight elevated to chief justice. and at the time that the roosevelt court really shape in the summer of 1941, many observers and predicted that the justices were going to march in lockstep. and again, they were you know, they were all very close
and there's a lot of discussion among people who follow the supreme court and think about the supreme court about the different in that kind background compared to the background of today's justices. well, when you think about some of the cases we'll momentarily which become so strikingly contradict in ways you mentioned one it's it's interesting to wonder about what that experience brought as well their very large personality is of some of them i think it's interesting you put the four in the...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court and why? >> because they >> believe that it's inappropriate for one state eight to decide how the rest of essentially the union will be able to operate. but their role is hold on. if i'm in charge of my own state elections than why would i not be in that best position here for my own voters? this is a way i think them to have the off-ramp that she was even herself because of being happening. and here it is, the off-ramp and the supreme court got off at that exit. >> what did you think norm eisen from what we just heard from the colorado secretary of state, well, wealth, their legal issues that reasonable minds can disagree about. i think secretary griswold position that the evidence strongly supported donald trump engaged in insurrection and the fair assessment that that is a threat to the devil i'm a critic. norms of the system. i think here though you can't underestimate the political win for donald trump a nine, nothing unanimous. supreme court decision is just something we saw him do it th
the supreme court and why? >> because they >> believe that it's inappropriate for one state eight to decide how the rest of essentially the union will be able to operate. but their role is hold on. if i'm in charge of my own state elections than why would i not be in that best position here for my own voters? this is a way i think them to have the off-ramp that she was even herself because of being happening. and here it is, the off-ramp and the supreme court got off at that exit....
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
paula reid at the supreme court. thank you very much joining us now, the colorado secretary of state, jenna griswold, madam secretary thanks so much for joining us. the high court says states don't have the power to remove federal candidates from the ballot. what's your reaction to this historic decision today? >> well, thank you for having me on first and foremost, i'm glad that they issued a decision colorado voters and american voters all across the country deserve to know whether donald trump is qualified or not as we go into super tuesday but in terms of the bigger decision, i'm disappointed. we believe that it's up to colorado or any state to determine whether to disqualify oath-breaking insurrectionists from our ballots. ultimately, the united states supreme court disagreed. votes for donald trump will count and he is on our ballot. >> the court didn't address the sensitive issue whether trump has actually an insurrectionist. are you disappointed by that and what worries you most about this decision? >> i woul
paula reid at the supreme court. thank you very much joining us now, the colorado secretary of state, jenna griswold, madam secretary thanks so much for joining us. the high court says states don't have the power to remove federal candidates from the ballot. what's your reaction to this historic decision today? >> well, thank you for having me on first and foremost, i'm glad that they issued a decision colorado voters and american voters all across the country deserve to know whether...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
either way let's get to the supreme court. the supreme court, i kind of trust them.ve both wayse. i do not appreciate a lot of the voices. i will and up being -- end up being, like a lot of the callers said, i list the arguments and judge sotomayor and judge brown sound like they will vote for every time i watch msnbc and cnn -- i watch all stations -- insurrection, insurrection. donald trump was never charged people currently sitting in jail that stormed the capital and did do things to charge them with insurrection. he should not be removed from the ballot because it sets a precedent for red states to do the same thing, to remove the runner it is a slippery slope. it really is. as far as the thing in georgia i think the evidence is going to prove, has pron, that those two, fani willis and mr. wade lied under oath. host: do you thinkt= residential immunity is a slippery slope? caller: yes, i do. not 100% immunity. that i agree with you on that aspect, but like the other callers, joe biden took documents out. and one callers while he was vice president, which is true
either way let's get to the supreme court. the supreme court, i kind of trust them.ve both wayse. i do not appreciate a lot of the voices. i will and up being -- end up being, like a lot of the callers said, i list the arguments and judge sotomayor and judge brown sound like they will vote for every time i watch msnbc and cnn -- i watch all stations -- insurrection, insurrection. donald trump was never charged people currently sitting in jail that stormed the capital and did do things to charge...
0
0.0
Mar 31, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's not the supreme court itself does not make itself supreme. that's reductive. right. what makes the supreme court supreme is that the political branches fund it and enforce its decisions. the supreme court did not desegregate central high school in rock. the army did right in enforcing brown. and so part of the problem is that the court has relied upon this. the notion is our job as the court is to persuade you, not necessarily that we're right, but that we're principled. right. and you don't have to agree with our principles. you just have to agree that they are principles. justice barrett really captured the sentiment in a speech in 2022. she says hey, listen, there's going to be some controversial coming down the pike. don't read the media accounts that call us hacks. she says read the opinion. well, two days later, there was a major in a clean water act case in which hers was the decisive vote and there was no opinion to read. right. and so, you know, part of what the part of the uses the sort of the increasing reliance upon these unsigned, unexplained orders real
it's not the supreme court itself does not make itself supreme. that's reductive. right. what makes the supreme court supreme is that the political branches fund it and enforce its decisions. the supreme court did not desegregate central high school in rock. the army did right in enforcing brown. and so part of the problem is that the court has relied upon this. the notion is our job as the court is to persuade you, not necessarily that we're right, but that we're principled. right. and you...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court keeps trump on ballot. states cannot borrow gop front-runner over his role in the capital attack. here's the washington times. unanimous ruling to keep trump on the ballot. states have no power in federal elections. the washington post. supreme court keeps trump on ballot nationwide. usa today. 9-0, supreme court keeps trump on ballot. other states cannot invoke insurrection clause. here is the new york times. justices rule 9-0.ru colorado loses the case. while you are dialing in we will speak to a reporter with the wall street journal, jess freeman. welcome to the program. questions did the supreme court rule on yesterday? guest: there were a number of arguments donald trump raised in his appeal. the supreme court honed in on one of them, which is only congress can enforce section 3 of the 14th amendment which bars former officials who engage in insurrection or rebellion from public office. the supreme court said only congress can set out the rules for enforcing the provision against a federal candidate an
supreme court keeps trump on ballot. states cannot borrow gop front-runner over his role in the capital attack. here's the washington times. unanimous ruling to keep trump on the ballot. states have no power in federal elections. the washington post. supreme court keeps trump on ballot nationwide. usa today. 9-0, supreme court keeps trump on ballot. other states cannot invoke insurrection clause. here is the new york times. justices rule 9-0.ru colorado loses the case. while you are dialing in...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i want to start by thanking the supreme court for its unanimous decision. today, it was a very important decision, were very well crafted, and i think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together, which are countries dw, correspond, that vision. benjamin alvarez gruber has more on what the supreme court said this. this is indeed a major victory for donald trump when we just heard the appraising the supreme court is important to remember that he himself nominated 3 of the justices that have republican majority, 6 to 3. but as you said, all of them decided that it's not up to states to decide to one of which of the candidates it should be or shouldn't be on the ballot, they decided that is not up to states to decided but up to congress atc and to look into this section 3 of the 14th amendment, that has been in discussions, and it's a pretty important case. what they said here because it does not only close the dispute between the supreme court of colorado and the us to people, but also other states like in maine and also like, oh, you know, they
i want to start by thanking the supreme court for its unanimous decision. today, it was a very important decision, were very well crafted, and i think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together, which are countries dw, correspond, that vision. benjamin alvarez gruber has more on what the supreme court said this. this is indeed a major victory for donald trump when we just heard the appraising the supreme court is important to remember that he himself nominated 3 of the justices...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
victoria, what's your reaction to the supreme court's decision today? is a win for former president trump, and this is going to be key so that narrative that trump has always had about him being the underdog, about him fighting the good fight against forces that want to keep him down. this is just the perfect narrative for him to take back to his base, right? this decision isn't necessarily going to change the minds of folks who might be on the fence, but it really is a further rallying solidifying gesture for his base. >> carlos, do you think this is going to have a huge impact on trump and his political advantage into this? >> jose, if we look at the results of the last presidential election, it was extremely close, so this isn't going to have a massive impact. we're not going to see massive shifts in polling, but because these elections are won on the margins, this matters, and this is, as we just heard going to help advance trump's victim hood narrative. he wants people to forget about the 6th of january. he wants people to believe that joe biden an
victoria, what's your reaction to the supreme court's decision today? is a win for former president trump, and this is going to be key so that narrative that trump has always had about him being the underdog, about him fighting the good fight against forces that want to keep him down. this is just the perfect narrative for him to take back to his base, right? this decision isn't necessarily going to change the minds of folks who might be on the fence, but it really is a further rallying...
0
0.0
Mar 6, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because of the many, many trump cases the supreme court is hearing.his would seem pretty clear the court was going to go into this ral argument and it was also the consensus of many observers of the court.llowed each state to make this kind of determination were pretty severe. the same can of the supre court majority could be qualified inat some states. not qualified in others. even based on the same records. this is not a shocker. three liberal justices a concurring opinion can you explain what the argument was? >> sure. to use the sometimes exotic and nomenclature all nine agree with the judgment. but not the opinion. they're only five who agreed with the majority was unsigned. we know who they were because we know who they are. process of elimination of it being a majority. three liberal justices jointly authored an opinion that itially, according to what some indications with a partial dissent because somebody and noted the metadata on the document the supreme court published use the word dissenting to refer to opinions that's not what is said whe
because of the many, many trump cases the supreme court is hearing.his would seem pretty clear the court was going to go into this ral argument and it was also the consensus of many observers of the court.llowed each state to make this kind of determination were pretty severe. the same can of the supre court majority could be qualified inat some states. not qualified in others. even based on the same records. this is not a shocker. three liberal justices a concurring opinion can you explain...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
maguire back the supreme court >> you're welcome. america. >> well, they agree that there was going to be some chaos if every state gets to decide whether trump can be on the ballot they got to have consistency. that's going to come from congress. they said, not the states. otherwise, you've got this will not a hilou, but patchwork that was as far as they wanted the court to go. but i mean, tell a baby not to cry the rest of them all. but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in the supreme court ponds to congress, right section five of the voting rights act comes to mind as exhibit number a we're waiting for that new pre-clearance formula. right. >> are you >> well-conserved, justice? amy coney, barrett, ape donald trump's third nominee, agreeing that the court went too far, maybe one to stop also at the he
maguire back the supreme court >> you're welcome. america. >> well, they agree that there was going to be some chaos if every state gets to decide whether trump can be on the ballot they got to have consistency. that's going to come from congress. they said, not the states. otherwise, you've got this will not a hilou, but patchwork that was as far as they wanted the court to go. but i mean, tell a baby not to cry the rest of them all. but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court 'udues, said it isn't. the supreme court judges. five _ said it isn't. of them, _ said it isn't. the supreme court - judges, five of them, unanimously, considered — judges, five of them, unanimously, considered that and came to the conclusion, which isn't too surprising, that rwanda is not a safe _ surprising, that rwanda is not a safe country. surprising, that rwanda is not a safe country-— safe country. this green peer reckons all — safe country. this green peer reckons all of _ safe country. this green peer reckons all of this _ safe country. this green peer reckons all of this is a - safe country. this green peerl reckons all of this is a waste of time. ~ ., ,., , time. whatever we say, the government _ time. whatever we say, the government will _ time. whatever we say, the government will not - time. whatever we say, the government will not listen i time. whatever we say, the | government will not listen to time. whatever we say, the - government will not listen to us. the debating and voting continues tonight and again on wednesday. so you saw one
the supreme court 'udues, said it isn't. the supreme court judges. five _ said it isn't. of them, _ said it isn't. the supreme court - judges, five of them, unanimously, considered — judges, five of them, unanimously, considered that and came to the conclusion, which isn't too surprising, that rwanda is not a safe _ surprising, that rwanda is not a safe country. surprising, that rwanda is not a safe country-— safe country. this green peer reckons all — safe country. this green peer...
0
0.0
Mar 14, 2024
03/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
as for the supreme court, the implementation has not yet started because a new written law has to bed which will allow for the verification of the judges of the supreme court with the participation of international experts, in fact, the judges every year, so you understand, fill so so-called declarations of integrity where they write confirming that their wealth fully corresponds to their income, that they do not do anything that violates the oath of the judge or nothing. which generally casts a shadow on the judicial system, and here are these declarations of integrity, they are checked in the event that during the check it turns out that after all the property does not correspond to the income, that everything... some actions were committed that discredit the judicial system, then such and such a judge can be dismissed, and it is important that this verification of these declarations, at least of the judges of the supreme court, it took place at a high level with the participation of international experts, because we understand that this is not just any ordinary district court, thi
as for the supreme court, the implementation has not yet started because a new written law has to bed which will allow for the verification of the judges of the supreme court with the participation of international experts, in fact, the judges every year, so you understand, fill so so-called declarations of integrity where they write confirming that their wealth fully corresponds to their income, that they do not do anything that violates the oath of the judge or nothing. which generally casts...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we want to go straight to the supreme court. just over three weeks after biden ordered the eviction ban, the six conservative justices of the supreme court sprang into action, quickly deciding the moratorium could not stand, but yes you can throw people out of their homes. three weeks. they had to do whatever it took. burn the midnight oil. feed the clerks extra helpings of red bull to make sure people could start being evicted again. those are just too odd examples on this court in recent memory. but it's also clearly the case for american history the court can and does move quickly on a high profile cases with a national political significance. we're tired about this case a lot yesterday. you know it, you love it. u.s. v. nixon, the infamous case in which richard nixon refused to hand tape recordings from the oval office to a federal judge in the watergate scandal. everyone in the country understood this was make-or- break for nixon. it was the biggest case of the time. those tapes could prove his involvement in crimes. and on
we want to go straight to the supreme court. just over three weeks after biden ordered the eviction ban, the six conservative justices of the supreme court sprang into action, quickly deciding the moratorium could not stand, but yes you can throw people out of their homes. three weeks. they had to do whatever it took. burn the midnight oil. feed the clerks extra helpings of red bull to make sure people could start being evicted again. those are just too odd examples on this court in recent...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that is why the supreme court essentially took up this case, not just a rule on one state, but the supreme court is the highest, you know, overlooks the highest law in the lamb us constitution. so whatever rules will most likely apply to the entire united states. and we don't know how it's going to, how the justices will react, but based on what they've already come out in public. and in terms of the hearing that led, that is probably gonna lead to this ruling. or they seem very skeptical of kicking . donald trump, at this stage, and in this way, at least off the colorado or any other ballot, especially in the primary season. and the lower court we understand, has already ruled unanimously, the trump is not immune from prosecution. so why would the supreme court one to review that? right, constitutional scholars, legal scholars almost across the board are saying that of course, the president does not have absolute immunity. a crime is that he or eventually she may commit. that would turn a president into a dictator or a king, which of course is the exact opposite of what the united states
that is why the supreme court essentially took up this case, not just a rule on one state, but the supreme court is the highest, you know, overlooks the highest law in the lamb us constitution. so whatever rules will most likely apply to the entire united states. and we don't know how it's going to, how the justices will react, but based on what they've already come out in public. and in terms of the hearing that led, that is probably gonna lead to this ruling. or they seem very skeptical of...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. 9-0. strong message to follow. >> dana: karl, the one thing i wanted to get your take on is my instincts are telling me this actually gives the biden team maybe a little bit more of a reason to step on the gas and to try to beat president trump on the merits rather than waiting for these left wing ideas on the judicial front to try to stop him from being the nominee. >> yeah, well, probably -- you've given them good advice because they really have, i think, been counting on these extraneous things to bring him down. look, some of these things have taken away his time and energy from the campaign but none of them have seemed to materially damaged his standing with the american electorate. this is what it's all about. getting the hearts and minds of the american people and a lot of people have looked at these things and said some of them give me pause. i want to hear more about them. but some of these seem to me to be over the top and piling on and unfair. and this was the most unfair of all
supreme court. 9-0. strong message to follow. >> dana: karl, the one thing i wanted to get your take on is my instincts are telling me this actually gives the biden team maybe a little bit more of a reason to step on the gas and to try to beat president trump on the merits rather than waiting for these left wing ideas on the judicial front to try to stop him from being the nominee. >> yeah, well, probably -- you've given them good advice because they really have, i think, been...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a unanimous ruling from the supreme court today to put the kibosh on that. didn't put the kibosh on other cases that are developing as we speak. i'm neil cavuto. this is "your world" with shannon bream on the significance of what happened today. hi, shannon. >> neil, great to see you. so yes, there's a number of controversies and cases the supreme court is dealing with this term that have the potential to impact the campaigns and the election. for today, a big win for the trump team for the former president. here's a business of what the opinion said. we're treating this like the majority opinion. it says here, responsibility for enforcing section 3 against federal office holders and candidates rest with congress and not the states. meaning none of the states can take this action. what we found out in this opinion is while there were no dissents, there was definitely a division within the courts. other justices defieding that they would file concurrences saying that they agree with the holding but not the reasoning. sotomayor kagan and jackson saying by reso
a unanimous ruling from the supreme court today to put the kibosh on that. didn't put the kibosh on other cases that are developing as we speak. i'm neil cavuto. this is "your world" with shannon bream on the significance of what happened today. hi, shannon. >> neil, great to see you. so yes, there's a number of controversies and cases the supreme court is dealing with this term that have the potential to impact the campaigns and the election. for today, a big win for the trump...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he told me why the supreme court decision is so significant or today supreme court ruling while it is important to stress that it is still temporary, is definitely significant as it shifts power to shape immigration law in the us from the federal to the state level. and that head of an election where immigration issues will be front and center of the complaint. and it also reflects the broader trend of the supreme court to give more autonomy to states as opposed to the federal level, which we have seen also in the past couple of years. and that raises questions for the future, about what will lie within the power of the federal government and within the power of the state of individual states, respectively. okay, so from the federal to state, but what is this concretely main fault for migraines? the lot essentially makes illegal immigration, the state level crime, and that means the state and local police will have the authority to arrest anyone . they suspect of having cross the border into texas. the legally, these people could then be charged in a state court and could even be forw
he told me why the supreme court decision is so significant or today supreme court ruling while it is important to stress that it is still temporary, is definitely significant as it shifts power to shape immigration law in the us from the federal to the state level. and that head of an election where immigration issues will be front and center of the complaint. and it also reflects the broader trend of the supreme court to give more autonomy to states as opposed to the federal level, which we...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was approved by the supreme labor council and also the increase of the minimum wage in other wage levels by 22 plus a fixed amount of 2326 rials was approved by the supreme labor council . 1402 was 1 million 769428 rials, which increased by 35% to two. well, this year , the supreme labor council had a special feature that the right to advance payment for dear married workers, whether male or female workers , was considered by the supreme labor council, and 5 million rials of advance payment was taken into account in the wage table of the workers, and in total the minimum monthly income of married workers increased by 3.3 tenths of the rate, and the average increase of this share was 35 percent, and the minimum monthly income of married workers with two children increased from 8 million 579 thousand tomans to 11 million 69 thousand tomans, with an average increase of 35 percent. share percentage increase he found that there is a place for me as an expert social partner. those who helped us in the meetings of the wage committee and also in the meetings of the supreme labor council ,
it was approved by the supreme labor council and also the increase of the minimum wage in other wage levels by 22 plus a fixed amount of 2326 rials was approved by the supreme labor council . 1402 was 1 million 769428 rials, which increased by 35% to two. well, this year , the supreme labor council had a special feature that the right to advance payment for dear married workers, whether male or female workers , was considered by the supreme labor council, and 5 million rials of advance payment...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court dealt with that after he was not incarcerated before the supreme court process. delay it, and so jason, i turn to you, our lonely nation turns to you. not because you have practice law as long as david kelly, or prosecuted as many tough cases as david kelly. or, run the southern district of new york like david kelly, who azar my people as my former boss. but jason, because i wonder whether the supreme court is acting in a way, that will ultimately be deemed by the evidence to look more partisan and legal, and what are your political thoughts on that? >> it's absolute partisan. this is garbage. and honestly ari, i think the public at large, and democrats in the white house. and frankly, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, and sonia sotomayor, should be standing up and screaming right now. this is an absolute disgusting abuse of power. and let me make this clear for the non lawyers out there. because i have -- the one lawyer who's here. i'm explaining this, i'm on campus right. it's like explaining this case to my students today. and they are literally saying w
the supreme court dealt with that after he was not incarcerated before the supreme court process. delay it, and so jason, i turn to you, our lonely nation turns to you. not because you have practice law as long as david kelly, or prosecuted as many tough cases as david kelly. or, run the southern district of new york like david kelly, who azar my people as my former boss. but jason, because i wonder whether the supreme court is acting in a way, that will ultimately be deemed by the evidence to...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's not what the supreme court has done here. that's not what the supreme court typically does. this is a procedural legalistic decision. and essentially if i had to boil it down to one sentence, it would be it's up to congress, not the individual didn't want a big messy situation where all the states goes over there and that sort of thing. the word i circled in >> this decision is quote, patchwork. they said we don't want a patchwork or one states doing one thing, and another states don't another. >> but you know, donald trump better than most covered him for many many leaders, many years as a reporter covering him as a politician and as a figure who takes things and we'll turn them the way that he wants america and the world to see them. >> i will be shocked if donald trump doesn't, as soon as he can get out there and argue, not only that the supreme court is behind him, but he's probably going to argue, even though there's nothing in here that specifically says, as elie reportedly pointed out anything about what happened on january 6, it's just procedural about whether the st
that's not what the supreme court has done here. that's not what the supreme court typically does. this is a procedural legalistic decision. and essentially if i had to boil it down to one sentence, it would be it's up to congress, not the individual didn't want a big messy situation where all the states goes over there and that sort of thing. the word i circled in >> this decision is quote, patchwork. they said we don't want a patchwork or one states doing one thing, and another states...
0
0.0
Mar 3, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is the supreme court. not forget, at times they make decisions like when it came to the 2020 election, that the did side on the facts and on the reality that joe biden was in fact elected president. there was some voter fraud. but what concerns me is what you said as far as the trust within the court, it seems to me that i will leave it to the two attorneys on the set to discuss the legal side, >> i wish you were all on set. >> i'm sorry, who are onscreen with me. but my concern is that the had an opportunity to kick this down, because it seems to me every legal scholar i have heard says, they will not grant any president complete immunity. but, they chose not to. and i guess, the only other second bite at the apple, here is how long do they -- to come back with a decision. they have not been, speedy has been talks about late schoon or early july at the end of the session, but maybe just maybe they can surprise us i hope. it is the reputation of the supreme court of the united states, not the 63 conservati
it is the supreme court. not forget, at times they make decisions like when it came to the 2020 election, that the did side on the facts and on the reality that joe biden was in fact elected president. there was some voter fraud. but what concerns me is what you said as far as the trust within the court, it seems to me that i will leave it to the two attorneys on the set to discuss the legal side, >> i wish you were all on set. >> i'm sorry, who are onscreen with me. but my concern...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.t all one voice in the united states of america right now. we are divided of. they showed us what it looks like with a purpose and a mission. >> emily: you know what i love about this decision and i have on my hand right here how clear it is pure anyone can read this opinion and understand exactly the logic behind the supreme court unanimous ruling. to your point, what we all expected, this is exactly what the constitution stands for. what i love as well, they're opening life has a come out, the constitution makes congress rather than the states responsible for enforcing section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates we reverse. they go on to explain the 14th amendment expanded federal power at the expense of state economy. this entire decision is saying, look them at the end of the day you are trying to apply something section 3 of the 14th amendment to give the states more power. but that is from congress and ultimately, they say because of the people. we talk about a lot the
supreme court.t all one voice in the united states of america right now. we are divided of. they showed us what it looks like with a purpose and a mission. >> emily: you know what i love about this decision and i have on my hand right here how clear it is pure anyone can read this opinion and understand exactly the logic behind the supreme court unanimous ruling. to your point, what we all expected, this is exactly what the constitution stands for. what i love as well, they're opening...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the the, this is the, the, the news live from berlin, the us supreme court. hans donald trump, a major victory with wide ranging implications. the justices unanimously rejecting colorado's bid to block the former president from its primary ballot watching similar attempts in other states. also in our program, france puts a woman's right to abortion, into its constitution for worlds 1st intended to prevent any rollback of abortion rights in the future. the hello and welcome to our show. i'm stephen beardsley in berlin. we begin in the us where the supreme court has ruled, but states cannot keep donald trump off the 2024 ballad. unanimous ruling strikes down, colorado's bid to bar trump from its presidential primary duty. his efforts to overturn his 2020 election defeats the states top court, removed him from the ballad in december. so adding a constitutional ban on every insurrection is running for office. supreme court said only congress could enforce that rule. trump has walk in the really i want to start by thanking the supreme court for its unanimous decision. today, it was a very i
the the, this is the, the, the news live from berlin, the us supreme court. hans donald trump, a major victory with wide ranging implications. the justices unanimously rejecting colorado's bid to block the former president from its primary ballot watching similar attempts in other states. also in our program, france puts a woman's right to abortion, into its constitution for worlds 1st intended to prevent any rollback of abortion rights in the future. the hello and welcome to our show. i'm...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so, that issue in front of the supreme court now in this immunity case is the question that supreme courtit was taking's weather and if so, to what extent, a former president is entitled to immunity from criminal prosecutions for actions taken within the scope of his official acts. both lower courts, judge chutkan in the district court in the d.c. circuit, unanimously, three judges, rejected that mr. trump as a former president, had any immunity from criminal prosecution, even for official acts. remember, this is when we had a question judge panel asked. got the president ordered s.e.a.l. team six to execute a political opponent? but that be an official act? the answer from mr. trump's attorney was basically, yes. so, those courts said you just don't have, you just don't have immunity from criminal prosecution, even for things within the scope of your official acts. the supreme court could agree with that, and if so, sent back down to start the trial. make a disagree with that and say there could be immunity for certain actions taken within the scope of official acts, but right, now but l
so, that issue in front of the supreme court now in this immunity case is the question that supreme courtit was taking's weather and if so, to what extent, a former president is entitled to immunity from criminal prosecutions for actions taken within the scope of his official acts. both lower courts, judge chutkan in the district court in the d.c. circuit, unanimously, three judges, rejected that mr. trump as a former president, had any immunity from criminal prosecution, even for official...
0
0.0
Mar 21, 2024
03/24
by
BELARUSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
council. just in the new status, the supreme council will meet on april 24-25, that is, well, 2 daystional one, yes, the second day is the main one, let’s look at the future , in theory, two days will be enough depending on how many initiatives there are, questions, if everyone wants to speak out, how will it be? he said that it would be... the number of 1200 delegates, no more than within, yes, this is 2/3 of the delegates directly elected by citizens, be it deputies of the house of representatives, or members of the council republics, but from local councils , that is, they still go through the crucible of this election struggle, this is the first one, that is , these are representatives of the people, of course, we had a practice in the previous period when they were elected from public organizations to the supreme council, and thanks to these deputies. from public organizations we received free education, free medical care, because there weren’t enough voices, these wise people, veterans, and people with disabilities from the society. and so on, they just made these very importan
council. just in the new status, the supreme council will meet on april 24-25, that is, well, 2 daystional one, yes, the second day is the main one, let’s look at the future , in theory, two days will be enough depending on how many initiatives there are, questions, if everyone wants to speak out, how will it be? he said that it would be... the number of 1200 delegates, no more than within, yes, this is 2/3 of the delegates directly elected by citizens, be it deputies of the house of...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the suppression to which had brought this court in front of the supreme court. and it also, the ruling also foreshadows the possible role of the supreme court in the elections later this year when it will, might come to decision between president joe biden and former president. and current candidates, donald trump. okay, that was our washington report affair and scowled. the friends, thanks so much for that. to the war and gaza, now we use rouse prime minister benjamin netanyahu says he's determined to press ahead with the plan to solve on the southern city of rough uh, thats to spied growing international concerns us state criteria state. and to me, blinking is preparing to head back to the middle east for talks to broker a cease fire and increase deliveries to the territory which has been on the siege following the october 7th. how must tara tax nearly 6 months into israel's war with moss? the you in a saying that the looming family and gaza is no accident. it might be visible, might be the $400.00 is funding interface, which before never ever encountered hung
the suppression to which had brought this court in front of the supreme court. and it also, the ruling also foreshadows the possible role of the supreme court in the elections later this year when it will, might come to decision between president joe biden and former president. and current candidates, donald trump. okay, that was our washington report affair and scowled. the friends, thanks so much for that. to the war and gaza, now we use rouse prime minister benjamin netanyahu says he's...
0
0.0
Mar 15, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court reversed that 9-0. it is very hard to get the supreme court to rule 9-0 on these key cases. there is democrat lawfare and election that even justices taken, sotomayor, and jackson not exactly trump fans, joint in this nine to nothing decision to side with president trump. you are seeing president biden's hands on all four of these unprecedented criminal prosecutions against president trump for non-crimes. it is not a crime to object to a presidential election in america. it is allowed by the electoral count act of 1887. democrats objected to republican wins in 1968, 2000, 2004, 2016. we do not see john kerry and hillary clinton in jail. it is also allowed by the first amendment to object to presidential elections. it is only illegal to object to a presidential election in third world marxist hellholes like zimbabwe and north korea and atlanta and washington d.c. host: you talked about the three justices. they say they protest the majority's efforts to use the case to define the efforts of federal enforc
the supreme court reversed that 9-0. it is very hard to get the supreme court to rule 9-0 on these key cases. there is democrat lawfare and election that even justices taken, sotomayor, and jackson not exactly trump fans, joint in this nine to nothing decision to side with president trump. you are seeing president biden's hands on all four of these unprecedented criminal prosecutions against president trump for non-crimes. it is not a crime to object to a presidential election in america. it is...
0
0.0
Mar 29, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court and up to the united states supreme court. but darrow nevertheless, is going to put up a little bit of questioning of these jurors, who largely come from the countryside around dayton. almost all of them are men who are fundamentalists. and he's going to use up his peremptory challenges and then turn to ralston occasionally to try to dismiss some juries for cause. because of their really pronounced fundamentalist views. ralstoll reject those challenges under the theory as put forward by the attorney general in trying to argue against darrow. he says, look, if a man is subject to challenge by the defendant because he believes the bible conflicts with the theory of evolution, then for the converse reason, the state would have grounds to challenge for cause. anyone who believe the theory of evolution and the result would be that everyone on earth who could be brought here would be challenged. and darrow was like, yeah, i don't we haven't had too many of these jurors who are believe in the theory of evolution. and he says, if you
court and up to the united states supreme court. but darrow nevertheless, is going to put up a little bit of questioning of these jurors, who largely come from the countryside around dayton. almost all of them are men who are fundamentalists. and he's going to use up his peremptory challenges and then turn to ralston occasionally to try to dismiss some juries for cause. because of their really pronounced fundamentalist views. ralstoll reject those challenges under the theory as put forward by...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but laura, that's what the supreme court does. they settled volatile questions of national significance so this quote could come back to haunt her because she goes on to say, particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up, but we know that's not always what supreme court decisions do. so i get what she's saying here. this is a time for consensus. a lot of questions about partisanship and ethics on the supreme court for the good of the country, we should all turn the temperature down, not up, but that, that could come back to haunt her in future decisions when right. she goes against maybe her colleagues goes against the grade of the national consensus on things. so interesting, the chief justice clearly had a lot of work to do behind the scenes to get a consensus here that might explain all so wolf, why it's taken a month to get to this very point in time. now, if you look at look ahead there is another very consequential supreme court or arguments coming at the end of ap
but laura, that's what the supreme court does. they settled volatile questions of national significance so this quote could come back to haunt her because she goes on to say, particularly in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up, but we know that's not always what supreme court decisions do. so i get what she's saying here. this is a time for consensus. a lot of questions about partisanship and ethics on the supreme court for the good of the...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i'm dana bash and we start with a monumental supreme court decision. the highest court in the land ruled unanimously that donald trump cannot be removed from any state's ballot because of his actions on january 6, the former president is calling the decision a quote, big win for america. he's expected to this any moment now from mar-a-lago in the meantime, let's go straight to the supreme court outside that building is where our paula reid is. so paula give our viewers a sense of what this decision does and what it does not do. and we're talking about just hours before voters in key states go to the polls. >> that's exactly right here. this is the biggest election-related decision from the court in nearly a quarter century. and it comes just hours before super tuesday. and here a unanimous court ruling that the state of colorado cannot remove former president trump from the ballot under section three of the 14th amendment, the so-called insurrectionist ban. the court writing quote, because the constitution makes congress rather than the states, respons
i'm dana bash and we start with a monumental supreme court decision. the highest court in the land ruled unanimously that donald trump cannot be removed from any state's ballot because of his actions on january 6, the former president is calling the decision a quote, big win for america. he's expected to this any moment now from mar-a-lago in the meantime, let's go straight to the supreme court outside that building is where our paula reid is. so paula give our viewers a sense of what this...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court siding with donald trump.ide the unanimous decision and why it avoided one big question. did the former president engage in an insurrection. >>> plus, how trump is reacting to the historic decision. his new comments outside mar-a-lago as he pushes ahead to a big super tuesday. >>> also breaking, trump's money man in handcuffs, and pleading guilty, what he's accused of lying about under oath. >>> and the man behind one of the biggest pentagon leaks in years back in court. the sentence for jack teixeira has part of a plea deal with prosecutors. our nbc news reporters are following all of the latest developments. we begin with nbc's ryan reilly who is covering this unanimous ruling from the supreme court. ryan, what stands out in this decision by the court? >> i think really that the court wanted to come to a united decision on this that left no doubt here in terms of 9-0 for the main part of this ruling here. essentially what it means is that on the day of what was supposed to be the first trial for donald trump
the supreme court siding with donald trump.ide the unanimous decision and why it avoided one big question. did the former president engage in an insurrection. >>> plus, how trump is reacting to the historic decision. his new comments outside mar-a-lago as he pushes ahead to a big super tuesday. >>> also breaking, trump's money man in handcuffs, and pleading guilty, what he's accused of lying about under oath. >>> and the man behind one of the biggest pentagon leaks in...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
progressive levels on the supreme court -- liberals on the supreme court.e was never accused of an insurrection. he was never tried. he was never convicted. he said let's go down there peacefully. nancy pelosi turned down his request0 troops to protect the capitol. my only question is, what motivated these justices in colorado and other states to bring about this lawsuit? y perspective if ever there was another vacancy on the supreme court in essence they are raising their hand to say pick me, pick me. i will do any stupid do. host: michael and washington, d.c. -- in washington d.c. caller: i agree with the supreme court ruling 9-0. i'm an educator in washington, d.c. i wish they would bring civics back to the -- we only have history twice a week at high schothe kids are not learning civics. you have to go by the law. a lot of people with their emotions. regardless of the judges being left-wing or whatever, they followed the law. donald trump regardless of how you feel about his rhetoric or whatever cavanaugh told him, he told jack smith get him for insurre
progressive levels on the supreme court -- liberals on the supreme court.e was never accused of an insurrection. he was never tried. he was never convicted. he said let's go down there peacefully. nancy pelosi turned down his request0 troops to protect the capitol. my only question is, what motivated these justices in colorado and other states to bring about this lawsuit? y perspective if ever there was another vacancy on the supreme court in essence they are raising their hand to say pick me,...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court ruled toda that decision. the supreme court ruled today that donald _ decision.ld trump - decision. the supreme court ruled today that donald trump can - decision. the supreme court ruled today that donald trump can stayl decision. the supreme court ruled l today that donald trump can stay on the ballot _ today that donald trump can stay on the ballot i— today that donald trump can stay on the ballot. ithink today that donald trump can stay on the ballot. i think that was important. we don't ever want some elected _ important. we don't ever want some elected official or anybody else saying — elected official or anybody else saying who can and can't be on a ballot _ saying who can and can't be on a ballot this _ saying who can and can't be on a ballot. this is america. this is america _ ballot. this is america. this is americe ilt— ballot. this is america. this is america. i'll defeat donald trump a fair and _ america. i'll defeat donald trump a fairand square, but america. i'll defeat donald trump a fair and square, but i want him on that ballot — fair and square
the supreme court ruled toda that decision. the supreme court ruled today that donald _ decision.ld trump - decision. the supreme court ruled today that donald trump can - decision. the supreme court ruled today that donald trump can stayl decision. the supreme court ruled l today that donald trump can stay on the ballot _ today that donald trump can stay on the ballot i— today that donald trump can stay on the ballot. ithink today that donald trump can stay on the ballot. i think that was...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
s. supreme court says takes, is, can arrest migraines for a legal entry into the country. it gives the state the power to police, its border with mexico, as part of a controversial republican backs. little one, the white house is unconstitutional. full, so coming up, did you wish to say is causes entire population size and cynthia hunger. but despite humanitarian concerns and warnings from allies, israel says plan ground operations and rough, and let's go ahead and the, the in announces more age for q cried another conference of keys and military back is here in germany as us defense secretary lloyd austin. once that's who crying, survival is in danger. the on jared raid, welcome to the program. authorities in the us state of texas have been given the go ahead to arrest people suspected the legally entering the country. the supreme court decision allowing the state to enforce its own controversial immigration law comes as republicans blinds abide and administer. i should not taking action on the issue. the texas governor says a closed environment is happening at the us bor
s. supreme court says takes, is, can arrest migraines for a legal entry into the country. it gives the state the power to police, its border with mexico, as part of a controversial republican backs. little one, the white house is unconstitutional. full, so coming up, did you wish to say is causes entire population size and cynthia hunger. but despite humanitarian concerns and warnings from allies, israel says plan ground operations and rough, and let's go ahead and the, the in announces more...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
unfortunately the supreme court decision here was not really defended in the u.s. supreme court. that led the court to get out over it skis today. for example. much of what the court said today that the 14 amendment is with states that can't police federal elections. i think that is wrong for the history. they had multiple, goals one was for restraining the states. another was bahrain insurrectionists from the office. as it happened in 1868 ohio. of course, the amendment itself says that two thirds of itself a rogue state unsettling like that, really donald trump couldn't get two thirds of the house in the senate to remove a disqualification as an insurrectionist. i think it is an unfortunate but expected decision today. >> what do you think about the message or warning for the concurring justices, neil? >> yeah, i think the supreme court works best when it doesn't -- it cares about its legitimacy, the most important constitutional law in the last hundred years by alexander basically said that the court preserve its legitimacy by not deciding things. that is traditionally already
unfortunately the supreme court decision here was not really defended in the u.s. supreme court. that led the court to get out over it skis today. for example. much of what the court said today that the 14 amendment is with states that can't police federal elections. i think that is wrong for the history. they had multiple, goals one was for restraining the states. another was bahrain insurrectionists from the office. as it happened in 1868 ohio. of course, the amendment itself says that two...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
all nine supreme court justices agree. colorado cannot judge just kicked trump off its 2024 ballots, regardless of what he did on january 6 coming up the sharp divide we see in the court over important details despite this unanimous ruling. plus we'll get reaction from trump's top republican challenger, nikki haley and from a conservative judge who thought the us supreme court should disqualify i'll fight trump. also this hour. a white house, welcome for a key israeli official, not nicknamed bebe instead, the welcome is for bibi is cheap political opponent. does this signal a new strategy for the united states? top biden administration official john kirby is here to respond and cnn on the ground found in yet another war torn country, this time its hating. were there to see up close how the explosion of gangs and crime have taken over. plus how haiti's problems spill into the united states welcome to the lead. >> i'm jake tapper. we start today with our law and justice lead and former president donald trump celebrating toda
all nine supreme court justices agree. colorado cannot judge just kicked trump off its 2024 ballots, regardless of what he did on january 6 coming up the sharp divide we see in the court over important details despite this unanimous ruling. plus we'll get reaction from trump's top republican challenger, nikki haley and from a conservative judge who thought the us supreme court should disqualify i'll fight trump. also this hour. a white house, welcome for a key israeli official, not nicknamed...
0
0.0
Mar 21, 2024
03/24
by
BELARUSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
council, well, the competencies of the delegate of the supreme council are clearly spelled out theretagems that colleagues just talked about, they predetermine , let’s say, our attitude to our reality and to the strategy of our future, the vns is, some call it a collective president, others call it a safety parachute , all this is correct, but the main point is, the main thing is that the main function of the sns, and the delegate of the sns, and the deputies are also delegates of the sns. this is to preserve unshakably the constitution of the country, the most important fundamental rights of our citizens, this is the most important thing in fact, everyone does their own thing, but at the same time, when we talk about people ’s rule, about democracy, we understand that no one legislative branch power, not executive, not judicial, not the president has no right. even greater immunity than they received before, all these things together allow us to avoid many unpleasant things, we just need to understand one thing, clearly and frankly and to be honest, we are a society that is making a
council, well, the competencies of the delegate of the supreme council are clearly spelled out theretagems that colleagues just talked about, they predetermine , let’s say, our attitude to our reality and to the strategy of our future, the vns is, some call it a collective president, others call it a safety parachute , all this is correct, but the main point is, the main thing is that the main function of the sns, and the delegate of the sns, and the deputies are also delegates of the sns....
0
0.0
Mar 18, 2024
03/24
by
BELARUSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on at the first meeting, the delegates of the supreme council will choose a chairman, decide how manyeputies he should have, who will become them, and also determine the composition of the presidium and the counting commission of the meeting. at the beginning of this meeting, the chairman of the ovns will not yet be present, therefore the registration of arriving delegates will be carried out by the central election commission, and the meeting will be carried out by its head. further, vns should be performed at least once a year. the president, the presidium of the supreme national assembly, or any of the chambers can convene in an extraordinary session. all of them received powers from the people during the presidential elections on a single voting day make decisions and propose options for the operation of the state machine on behalf of the majority of belarusians. we have chosen deputies of one level, from among them come deputies and delegates of a higher level, and civil servants appointed by our elected president will work with them. there is something in the system of forming t
on at the first meeting, the delegates of the supreme council will choose a chairman, decide how manyeputies he should have, who will become them, and also determine the composition of the presidium and the counting commission of the meeting. at the beginning of this meeting, the chairman of the ovns will not yet be present, therefore the registration of arriving delegates will be carried out by the central election commission, and the meeting will be carried out by its head. further, vns...
0
0.0
Mar 21, 2024
03/24
by
BELARUSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the supreme national assembly, is to preserve unshakably the constitution of the country, the mostmental rights of our citizens, and this is the most important thing in fact, everyone does their own thing, but at the same time , when we speak about people's rule, about people's power, we understand that no one is a legislative branch of power. not executive, not judicial, not the president has the right to change fundamental values without internal national consensus, this is the most important task of the all-belarus people 's assembly, allow, at the same time, there are things that, again, without which normal functioning is impossible, without a fair trial, right, again, when we talk about our changes in the constitution, we clearly see... this is why we are introducing the belarusian people's assembly, so that in no case in the event of any geopolitical turbulence, internal or external changes situation, did not lose the country, did not lose those fundamental principles for which the absolute majority of the country's citizens voted at the constitutional level, and this is p
of the supreme national assembly, is to preserve unshakably the constitution of the country, the mostmental rights of our citizens, and this is the most important thing in fact, everyone does their own thing, but at the same time , when we speak about people's rule, about people's power, we understand that no one is a legislative branch of power. not executive, not judicial, not the president has the right to change fundamental values without internal national consensus, this is the most...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
did the supreme court make the right decision, here?ump can be on the ballot, but we are heartened by the fact that not one of the nine justices disagreed with the findings of the courts below that found donald trump did engage in insurrection against the constitution and was responsible for the violence of january 6. many options were available to the court. donald trump urge them to reverse much of the work below. they took a procedural out, so we lost, but in a way that left intact many of the findings that we worked so hard to achieve below. many people found that very interesting that the nine justices of the supreme court opted to really stay away from the issue of whether or not donald trump committed an act of insurrection, even though, as you mentioned, the state of colorado found that he did. why do you think they stayed away from that argument? well, i think the easy answer is the facts are unassailable. it is unquestioned — his planning, his role, his orchestration of the insurrection onjanuary 6. i have to say, of course, h
did the supreme court make the right decision, here?ump can be on the ballot, but we are heartened by the fact that not one of the nine justices disagreed with the findings of the courts below that found donald trump did engage in insurrection against the constitution and was responsible for the violence of january 6. many options were available to the court. donald trump urge them to reverse much of the work below. they took a procedural out, so we lost, but in a way that left intact many of...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and she took it to the, the courts and the state supreme court of colorado. i believe they're playing politics or did play politics in their decision and, and, and the, that is the tech talk go chop up about, you just can't go. it is obvious in the, in the oral arguments before the supreme court, when they heard this case, it was obvious that this had a chance to be a 9 to nothing decision in trump's favor. and today it came to fruition and you have those on the left trying to spin it. oh it's really 5 to 4 because blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, know it's 9 to nothing. and that should send to resign the message. but the left is trying to do anything and everything they can to get donald, make sure donald trump does when re election, everything and anything. he's still facing trials, he still thinks in court dates on other cases. but this is a major victory. and i think it's gonna help him politically. oh, i know now this case is the 1st says the american civil war to deal with the 14th amendment of the us constitution, the bands or festival who have engaged in
and she took it to the, the courts and the state supreme court of colorado. i believe they're playing politics or did play politics in their decision and, and, and the, that is the tech talk go chop up about, you just can't go. it is obvious in the, in the oral arguments before the supreme court, when they heard this case, it was obvious that this had a chance to be a 9 to nothing decision in trump's favor. and today it came to fruition and you have those on the left trying to spin it. oh it's...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the conservative majority of the us supreme court had cleared the way for the law. and it's known as senate bill four, sb4 to take effect. >> while >> the legal battle was playing out, making its way through the court system. but then just hours later appeals court said, hold on. once again, pausing these new law enforcement measures as they consider whether or not the law violates the constitution. critics say that sb4 at its core, what this gets down to critics say that it violates human rights stokes racial profiling, and overreaches government authority. the texas governor though says it is necessary to slow the crisis at his border seen as flores is an arizona following all of this for us this morning, rosa, there are a lot of moving parts. you have been following the path of sb4 from the beginning and a dramatic turn current overnight. where does things stand and where did things go >> well, you were talking about the whiplash. here's more there's a hearing in the fifth circuit today, which means that this law could be placed on hold again or it could be made
the conservative majority of the us supreme court had cleared the way for the law. and it's known as senate bill four, sb4 to take effect. >> while >> the legal battle was playing out, making its way through the court system. but then just hours later appeals court said, hold on. once again, pausing these new law enforcement measures as they consider whether or not the law violates the constitution. critics say that sb4 at its core, what this gets down to critics say that it...