1
1.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
judge pedenko, who was also found relevant by the supreme court of appeals, delayed 21 cases of suchntil the deadline expired. however , it is impossible to find out the reasons for the decision of the supreme court of appeals according to the judges. of all the decisions taken on unfitness for the position of a judge, none has been published so far. the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office sent an indictment to the court. to the intermediary of the judge of the kropyvnytskyi court of appeal of volodymyr honchar, suspected of receiving a bribe of 10.5 thousand dollars. according to the case materials, for this money, the judge promised to review the verdict of the court of first instance and change the punishment for committing a traffic accident with fatal consequences. from three years of imprisonment to a conditional term. the judge instructed his intermediary to receive and keep the bribe. detectives of the national anti-corruption bureau and the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office reported. about the suspicion of judge gonchar last october. autonomous pros
judge pedenko, who was also found relevant by the supreme court of appeals, delayed 21 cases of suchntil the deadline expired. however , it is impossible to find out the reasons for the decision of the supreme court of appeals according to the judges. of all the decisions taken on unfitness for the position of a judge, none has been published so far. the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office sent an indictment to the court. to the intermediary of the judge of the kropyvnytskyi court...
1
1.0
Feb 25, 2024
02/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
so, in this case, the candidates themselves can refer the matter to the supreme court of appeal.goes to the constitutional court it is now the highest court in our land. the constitutional court usually issues a verdict. he either approves the opinion of the complainant candidate or the complainant party or rejects their opinion, in which case their request will be rejected and in this case the issue will be closed. if you remember, in connection with your previous question, i also mentioned the election court . sometimes the electoral court, before all these mechanisms go ahead, where the communication committee. a few parties can't solve this problem, usually they submit the issue to the electoral court, the electoral court also says whether will hear the matter or the matter should be submitted to higher courts. what is the average participation rate in parliamentary elections in your country? we believe that this decrease is closely related to the decrease in support for the ruling party of the african national congress, but on the other hand, this is the people's dissatisfac
so, in this case, the candidates themselves can refer the matter to the supreme court of appeal.goes to the constitutional court it is now the highest court in our land. the constitutional court usually issues a verdict. he either approves the opinion of the complainant candidate or the complainant party or rejects their opinion, in which case their request will be rejected and in this case the issue will be closed. if you remember, in connection with your previous question, i also mentioned...
3
3.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 3
favorite 0
quote 0
however, it is impossible to find out the reasons for the decision of the supreme court of appeals accordingo the judges. of all the decisions taken on unfitness for the position of a judge, none has been published so far. the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office referred the case to court the indictment against the intermediary of the judge of the kropyvnytskyi court of appeal, volodymyr honchar, who is suspected of receiving $10,500 in bribes. according to the materials. case for this money, the judge promised to review the verdict of the court of first instance and change the punishment for committing a traffic accident with fatal consequences from three years of imprisonment to a suspended sentence. the judge instructed his mediator to receive and keep the bribe. detectives of the national anti-corruption bureau and the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office reported the suspicion to judge gonchar in october last year. the prosecutor's office of the autonomous republic of crimea completed the investigation into the treason of the duty officer. ex-judge of the court of
however, it is impossible to find out the reasons for the decision of the supreme court of appeals accordingo the judges. of all the decisions taken on unfitness for the position of a judge, none has been published so far. the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office referred the case to court the indictment against the intermediary of the judge of the kropyvnytskyi court of appeal, volodymyr honchar, who is suspected of receiving $10,500 in bribes. according to the materials. case for...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the part of the appeal the supreme court threw out today was donald trump's claim of double jeopardy on the basis that he is now being prosecuted for some of the same crimes he was charged with in his second impeachment trial in the united states senate, in which a majority of senators voted to find him guilty, but not the two thirds necessary to convict him. the supreme court gave trump's lawyers three weeks to submit their brief and gave jack smith then three weeks to reply to the trump brief, then the trump lawyers will get a final week for a final written reply, and a week after that the supreme court will hear the arguments in the case on april 22nd. the supreme court is not being asked to provide total and absolute immunity for any and all possible criminal conduct by a president. the trump petition to the supreme court only asks for immunity for a president's official acts or, quote, those performed within the outer perimeter of his official responsibility. the argument trump's lawyers make before the supreme court could be a rerun of some of what we heard in the appeals court
the part of the appeal the supreme court threw out today was donald trump's claim of double jeopardy on the basis that he is now being prosecuted for some of the same crimes he was charged with in his second impeachment trial in the united states senate, in which a majority of senators voted to find him guilty, but not the two thirds necessary to convict him. the supreme court gave trump's lawyers three weeks to submit their brief and gave jack smith then three weeks to reply to the trump...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court thursday hears oral argument in donald trump's appeal of the decision.ave it live at the clock a.m. eastern, c-span now, and online at c-span.org. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. your funded by these television companies more, including midco. ♪>> ♪ no one can do it like we do ♪ >> midco supports c-span as a public service, along with these other television providers, giving you a front row seat to democracy. >> former president donald trump also met with union members. he spoke with reporters after meeting witthe head of teamsters. he said he thought head a good shot of getting the union's endorsement. the union endorsed president biden in 2020 and hillary clinton in 2016. following th'brietold reportersn has a long way to go before making a decision. ■
supreme court thursday hears oral argument in donald trump's appeal of the decision.ave it live at the clock a.m. eastern, c-span now, and online at c-span.org. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. your funded by these television companies more, including midco. ♪>> ♪ no one can do it like we do ♪ >> midco supports c-span as a public service, along with these other television providers, giving you a front row seat to democracy. >> former president...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
11th, trying to get the supreme court to take this case then and by past the court of appeals. because it was obviously going to eventually end up in the supreme court anyway, as it has. in that filing, in december, jack smith laid out the timeline of just how quickly the united states supreme court can act when it wants to. quote, on may 24th, 1974, the special prosecutor -- a week later, and set the case for -- the decision issued 16 days later. when the trial began in the fall of 1974. so the timeline, when the supreme court wanted to new move fast in the nixon case, was a total of two months. from the first filing requesting that the supreme court hear the case to the day the supreme court issued its opinion. two months. if the supreme court had taken this case when jack smith asked him to -- -- and if they followed the nixon schedule, they would've issued their opinion on this case on monday of this week. two days ago. and instead, on monday of this week, the trump lawyers filed their request for the supreme to -- win -- supreme court already let -- completely unnecessary
11th, trying to get the supreme court to take this case then and by past the court of appeals. because it was obviously going to eventually end up in the supreme court anyway, as it has. in that filing, in december, jack smith laid out the timeline of just how quickly the united states supreme court can act when it wants to. quote, on may 24th, 1974, the special prosecutor -- a week later, and set the case for -- the decision issued 16 days later. when the trial began in the fall of 1974. so...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
or that sort of— supreme court or appeals or that sort of thing.unexpected. i don't think anybody seriously thought that he could, _ think anybody seriously thought that he could, as a former president, claim _ he could, as a former president, claim immunity. that is kind of ridiculous _ claim immunity. that is kind of ridiculous. but it does look like the supreme court is going to probably— the supreme court is going to probably side against colorado and well allowed trump, will not print states _ well allowed trump, will not print states to — well allowed trump, will not print states to remove trump from the ballot _ states to remove trump from the ballot so — states to remove trump from the ballot. so that is a good outcome for him — ballot. so that is a good outcome for him. ., ,, ., .., ballot. so that is a good outcome for him. ., ,, ., .. ., for him. congressman when can i want to net our for him. congressman when can i want to get your take _ for him. congressman when can i want to get your take on _ for him. congressman when can i want to
or that sort of— supreme court or appeals or that sort of thing.unexpected. i don't think anybody seriously thought that he could, _ think anybody seriously thought that he could, as a former president, claim _ he could, as a former president, claim immunity. that is kind of ridiculous _ claim immunity. that is kind of ridiculous. but it does look like the supreme court is going to probably— the supreme court is going to probably side against colorado and well allowed trump, will not print...
0
0.0
Feb 13, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court of appeals told trump he had until yesterday to go to the supreme court or they would restartceedings in the trial court. they told trump, you can't ask the entire district of columbia court of appeals to rehear the decision of our three-judge panel. if you do that, that won't stop the clock in the trial court either. trump is saying to the supreme court, please stop the clock in front of the trial court. let me go to the court of appeals where all of the sitting judges would hear my appeal rather than just this three-judge panel. after that, let me come to the supreme court. that amounts to one thing, delay. this appellate procedure is incredibly -- it's very complicated, very intricate. it's difficult to explain on tv. it's meant to protect a litigant's due process rights. in this particular situation, trump is clearly stretching those limits and abusing the process. >> how long can this stretch out? the supreme court is asking for briefs from jack smith opposing this trump request by next tuesday. would they hear oral arguments on that? would they likely rule on whether or
the court of appeals told trump he had until yesterday to go to the supreme court or they would restartceedings in the trial court. they told trump, you can't ask the entire district of columbia court of appeals to rehear the decision of our three-judge panel. if you do that, that won't stop the clock in the trial court either. trump is saying to the supreme court, please stop the clock in front of the trial court. let me go to the court of appeals where all of the sitting judges would hear my...
0
0.0
Feb 13, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now, the country's supreme court recently denied his appeal of that conviction, but in a dramatic move, another country, nicaragua, stepped in and offered him amnesty. and this other country, nicaragua is apparently trying to protect himgu from going to jail. this former president who has been convicted, due in prison, he's not gone to prison. instead he's moved to the nicker waugan embassy in his country he's they've offered him asylum. heff moved in with his desk and his dog named bruno. there's bruno. from thatbr exile, from that otr country's embassy while he's hiding out from his ten-year prison sentence he's now running for president of panama again. and he'st winning. according to "the new york times" recent polls show him running in first place. this convicted fugitive right wing businessman former president now trying to rally his countrymen saying online, quote, you have to be very cowardly to discoif a presidential candidate who's first in the polls. yes,di if i can win votes who cares if i'm a convicted felon, spring me out of here. that is happening right now in panama the
now, the country's supreme court recently denied his appeal of that conviction, but in a dramatic move, another country, nicaragua, stepped in and offered him amnesty. and this other country, nicaragua is apparently trying to protect himgu from going to jail. this former president who has been convicted, due in prison, he's not gone to prison. instead he's moved to the nicker waugan embassy in his country he's they've offered him asylum. heff moved in with his desk and his dog named bruno....
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court hears oral arguments in donald trump's appeal of that decision. we will have it live starting eastern, c-span.org -- and on c-span.org. >> welcome to today's "washington journal." we will start with and a people that asked about the fairness of taxes. taxes and here are the results. here is the question about how fair or unfair each of the following taxes are and these are broken up by different types of taxes starting with the federal social security tax. green is very or somewhat fair in the blue is unfair and overall 46-51 on the social security tax. when it shows by party republicans find taxes unfair the democrats and here is the state sales tax, state income tax and local property tax. at federal income tax 39 consider it fair, 60 unfair. a couple of more results how most do not understand how taxes are calculated in the question is do you consider the amount you pay too high, too low or just right? you will see the blue is too much or too high. the local federal income tax and local sales tax. we want to find out what you think about that b
supreme court hears oral arguments in donald trump's appeal of that decision. we will have it live starting eastern, c-span.org -- and on c-span.org. >> welcome to today's "washington journal." we will start with and a people that asked about the fairness of taxes. taxes and here are the results. here is the question about how fair or unfair each of the following taxes are and these are broken up by different types of taxes starting with the federal social security tax. green is...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if he had, the court of appeals provided its stay would continue until the supreme court acted on that application for stay. now, none of us knows what the supreme court will do with this case. i believe the supreme court will ultimately deny review of this case. so that the trial can proceed as expeditiously as possible. >> thank you as always for your time and expertise. let's discuss with joe and jamie. let's start with the judge said , you have written books on the u.s. supreme court. do you agree with his prediction that the u.s. supreme court is ultimately going to defer to whatever the u.s. court of appeals decides >> it is close, a close call, this was a strong opinion and important it was unanimous. i think it was important that there were republican and democratic appointees and it went with past president and donald trump has never had strong arguments in this area but the u.s. supreme court has the right to be the final arbiter of what is in the competition -- and there may be justices who think they should do it and maybe some justices who think they should not give donald
if he had, the court of appeals provided its stay would continue until the supreme court acted on that application for stay. now, none of us knows what the supreme court will do with this case. i believe the supreme court will ultimately deny review of this case. so that the trial can proceed as expeditiously as possible. >> thank you as always for your time and expertise. let's discuss with joe and jamie. let's start with the judge said , you have written books on the u.s. supreme court....
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
once trump provides notice of his intent to appeal, the supreme court will decide whether to stay the ruling pending trump's filing of a where it. or will they allow the judge to re-list the case for trial. writ. trump wants to delay all the cases against him and run out the clock until election day. a supreme court's day would freeze the proceedings at the trial court's level and make it likely to be stayed until the election. the judge could simultaneously put the case back on her trial calendar. iffer here's the issue. iffer can donald trump get the necessary five votes needed for a stay? he appointed 3 of the 9 justices. that's no guarantee how any of them will vote. whether this case viewed by me and by many as the most potentially perilous to trump, whether it gets to trial before the election could determine the election winner. the poll last week sos donald trump over biden by five points but when asked if a trump conviction would change their vote the lead switches to biden by two. joining me now is a professor at the penn carey law school and specializes in civil complex leg
once trump provides notice of his intent to appeal, the supreme court will decide whether to stay the ruling pending trump's filing of a where it. or will they allow the judge to re-list the case for trial. writ. trump wants to delay all the cases against him and run out the clock until election day. a supreme court's day would freeze the proceedings at the trial court's level and make it likely to be stayed until the election. the judge could simultaneously put the case back on her trial...
0
0.0
Feb 13, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
appeals to the american supreme court.o playing for more time. how strong is this play? how strong is his case for this. and if the supreme court does grant him what he's asking what would that mean for the timing of his big federal trial for trying to stay in office after he was voted out. joining us now is chuck rosenburg. thank you for being here. >> my pleasure rachel. >> did i explain the basics of that correctly. that he's e e if effectively trying to take away that rushing tactic. you have to end this appeals process at some point and get to trial. >> yes, good description. think of it this way. three step stepladder. step one would be the trial court. a trial would be conducted and a trial rendered. prosecutors want to be there and mr. trump does not. step two would be the appellate court. and what he would like to do now is either be on wrong number three, step three, the supreme court or back in the appellate court. by all means rachel to avoid step one the trial court. >> what do you make of the strength of his
appeals to the american supreme court.o playing for more time. how strong is this play? how strong is his case for this. and if the supreme court does grant him what he's asking what would that mean for the timing of his big federal trial for trying to stay in office after he was voted out. joining us now is chuck rosenburg. thank you for being here. >> my pleasure rachel. >> did i explain the basics of that correctly. that he's e e if effectively trying to take away that rushing...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
smith wanted this heard by the supreme court initially following trump's team appeal of judge chutkan's initial ruling, but for trump's legal team here, there is also a recognition that this three-judge panel, they wrote, in part, former president trump's alleged efforts to remain in power despite losing the 2020 election were if proven an unprecedented assault on the structure of our government. he allegedly injected himself into a process in which the president has no role. the counting and certifying of the electoral college votes. the question here going forward for trump and his legal team is just exactly when the supreme court, if they were in fact to take up the appeal, when they would hear it and for a trial that could take about three months here, just how far along would that potentially impact his own presidential campaign in the general election campaign ahead of november. >> back to lisa rubin, the argument trump's trying to make that this just opened up a whole can of worms if he isn't given immunity, did the judges here effectively shut that down? >> i think they did. in
smith wanted this heard by the supreme court initially following trump's team appeal of judge chutkan's initial ruling, but for trump's legal team here, there is also a recognition that this three-judge panel, they wrote, in part, former president trump's alleged efforts to remain in power despite losing the 2020 election were if proven an unprecedented assault on the structure of our government. he allegedly injected himself into a process in which the president has no role. the counting and...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court hears an oral argument of donald trump's appeal. we have it at 10m. on c-span, c-span c-span.org. >> a healthy democracy does not just look like this. it looks like this. where americans can see democracy at work, where citizens are truly informed, a republic thrives. get informed straight from the sources on c-span, unfiltered, unbiased, word f■6or word. from the nation's capital to wherever you are because the opinion that matters the most is your own. this is what democracy looks like. c-span, powered by cable. >> now from the floor of the u.s. house, republican congresswoman marjorie taylor greene of georgia offers the resolution to censure minnesota democratic congresswoman over a disputed translation of comments she made about somalia, as the privilege resolution, house leadership must bring this to the floor f a vote within two legislative days or they could vote to table measure, if requested. >>
supreme court hears an oral argument of donald trump's appeal. we have it at 10m. on c-span, c-span c-span.org. >> a healthy democracy does not just look like this. it looks like this. where americans can see democracy at work, where citizens are truly informed, a republic thrives. get informed straight from the sources on c-span, unfiltered, unbiased, word f■6or word. from the nation's capital to wherever you are because the opinion that matters the most is your own. this is what...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and then in april a supreme court scotus appeal of whether or not there ever will be a federal trial for what donald trump stands accused of leading up to and including the day of january 6th. the issue here is that even if the court rejects donald trump's claims of endless permanent immunity as many expect, this act of merely taking the case depending on the calender could delay it close to the election as some of our legal experts were discussing moment ago or potentially past it. so what happens next? i want to bring in the top guest we could have for this exact federal question. andrew weissman is former special counsel in the mueller probe and also served as general prosecutor. there's so much here and i want to get into it with you and our experts were making sense with nicolle moments ago. i want to get into that and what this means and says. but in the spirit of transparency and keeping it real with the viewers as i always do, i'll tell them i was both reading this, listening to you and others talk to nicolle and struck me and may have struck some viewers there was attention
and then in april a supreme court scotus appeal of whether or not there ever will be a federal trial for what donald trump stands accused of leading up to and including the day of january 6th. the issue here is that even if the court rejects donald trump's claims of endless permanent immunity as many expect, this act of merely taking the case depending on the calender could delay it close to the election as some of our legal experts were discussing moment ago or potentially past it. so what...
0
0.0
Feb 3, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the tennessee supreme court and then appeal to the federal supreme court on the federal constitutional matters. but the tennessee supreme court is going to dismiss the appeal on a technicality that they didn't get it filed in time and the fine overturned the the conviction of scopes under the theory that the law the fine how much it should be $100 or $500 should have been set by the jury, not ralston, but they dismiss the case rather than send it back. saying nothing is to be gained by prolonging the life of this bizarre case. and they crush darrow's appeals. and the butler act will stay on the books in tennessee for the next 40 years. and as we've talked about in this class, we want to know why these trials are so famous cases that everyone knows that have no precedential value and the scopes trial doesn't have precedential value because the tennessee supreme court undoes the hopes of the aclu and darrow that this could become something on appeal. so instead it's remembered and it is widely remembered because of the cultural import, because how it represents all these divisive divisio
the tennessee supreme court and then appeal to the federal supreme court on the federal constitutional matters. but the tennessee supreme court is going to dismiss the appeal on a technicality that they didn't get it filed in time and the fine overturned the the conviction of scopes under the theory that the law the fine how much it should be $100 or $500 should have been set by the jury, not ralston, but they dismiss the case rather than send it back. saying nothing is to be gained by...
17
17
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 17
favorite 0
quote 2
the appeal will go to the united states supreme court making this yet another issue of trump's candidacywill begin over whether the former president violated the constitution with his behavior around january the 6th. a case we will discuss just a little later this hour with judge michael luttig, but what the supreme court decides with today's ruling on impunity will have huge implications for accountability. if the high court acts quickly, there is a chance smith's election interference case can go to trial before the presidential election in november, and that's where we start this hour with the congresswoman, madeleine dean of pennsylvania, and with me at the table is msnbc legal analyst, he lisa rubin and chief legal correspondent and host of the beat ari melber, a rare occasion to have -- to be in the same place with you, ari. >> very happy to be with everyone. >> nice to see you. and congresswoman dean, when i am in pennsylvania, she is my member of congress, so it's good to see you again, congresswoman. let me start with you. let's start with the big picture first, as opposed to th
the appeal will go to the united states supreme court making this yet another issue of trump's candidacywill begin over whether the former president violated the constitution with his behavior around january the 6th. a case we will discuss just a little later this hour with judge michael luttig, but what the supreme court decides with today's ruling on impunity will have huge implications for accountability. if the high court acts quickly, there is a chance smith's election interference case...
0
0.0
Feb 13, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now, the country's supreme court recently denied his appeal of that conviction. in a dramatic move, another country, nicaragua, stepped in and offered him amnesty. and this other country, nicaragua, is apparently trying to protect him from going to jail. this former president of panama, who has been convicted, who is due in prison. he is not gone in prison. instead, he is removed that nicaraguan embassy in this country because nicaragua has offered him asylum. he moved in with his desk and his sofa and his dog who is named bruno. and there is bruno. from that exile, from that other country's embassy, while he's hiding out from his ten year visit prison sentence, he's no running for president of panama again. and he is winning, according to the new york times, recent polls show him running in first place. this convicted, fugitive right- wing businessman, former president, now trying to rally his countryman saying online, quote, you have to be very cowardly to disqualify a presidential candidate who is first in the polls. yes, if i can win votes, who cares that i a
now, the country's supreme court recently denied his appeal of that conviction. in a dramatic move, another country, nicaragua, stepped in and offered him amnesty. and this other country, nicaragua, is apparently trying to protect him from going to jail. this former president of panama, who has been convicted, who is due in prison. he is not gone in prison. instead, he is removed that nicaraguan embassy in this country because nicaragua has offered him asylum. he moved in with his desk and his...
1
1.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
PRESSTV
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
courts and they found in favor of the israeli states and then they appealed it. parents appealed it and again the supreme court found in favor of the israeli state, so we've never had a full investigation, we've never been able to identify exactly what happened, and it's led to people being suggest, offering suggestions as to what took place from both sides, which never have happened, because there should have been as a clear investigation that found out exactly who was responsible and why? david, this... character ben shapiro's position at the the david horowitz freedom center was funded by a director of the charity that funds the israeli military, just say a word to will you about this organization, the so-called friends of the idf, well let's remember that the david horivit center is one of the key islamophobic think tanks in the us, part of the what's been called the islamophobic network, of course largely funded by scientists, and unsurprisingly they these the people who fund this. organization, also f the friends of the israel defense forces, which of course uh is the us equiv
courts and they found in favor of the israeli states and then they appealed it. parents appealed it and again the supreme court found in favor of the israeli state, so we've never had a full investigation, we've never been able to identify exactly what happened, and it's led to people being suggest, offering suggestions as to what took place from both sides, which never have happened, because there should have been as a clear investigation that found out exactly who was responsible and why?...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
KGO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so the supreme court has a very strong unanimous court of appeals opinion. if it wanted to affirm that opinion, it could do it in a matter of weeks. >> the supreme court is also considering whether states can keep trump off the ballot for his alleged role in the january 6th attack. >> i consider it to be more election interference by the democrats as to what they're doing. >> just yesterday, illinois joined colorado and maine in trying to remove him from the primary ballot. although the court has indicated it's likely to side with trump, there is one not so great piece of news for trump. yesterday, a judge rejected his request to delay paying the $454 million judgment in his civil real estate fraud case in new york, meaning he must post bond for the full amount by late next month. trump's lawyers have suggested he does not have enough money on hand to cover the full amount, saying properties would likely need to be sold to raise capital . new york's attorney general has said if trump cannot pay the judgment, she could soon begin start to seize his properties
so the supreme court has a very strong unanimous court of appeals opinion. if it wanted to affirm that opinion, it could do it in a matter of weeks. >> the supreme court is also considering whether states can keep trump off the ballot for his alleged role in the january 6th attack. >> i consider it to be more election interference by the democrats as to what they're doing. >> just yesterday, illinois joined colorado and maine in trying to remove him from the primary ballot....
1
1.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
disqualified him from the election, the supreme court of the united states is considering trump's appeal today, well, i think that it is unlikely that the supreme court will uphold the decision of the supreme court of the state of colorado, but regarding criminal cases , the first trial will be on march 25, so let's see. what will happen next, let's hope, thank you, igor eisenberg, professor of new york university, there was espresso, and we talked about the difficult situation that is currently happening around the support package for ukraine, and actually today they will try to vote again on this decision, we will inform you, but roman and i are already saying goodbye to you for today, these few hours it flew by very quickly for us, we are passing the baton on to our colleagues, and we will see you tomorrow in this studio. take care and be safe until we meet, greetings viewers of espress. the news team will talk about the most relevant events of the moment, and this one i start the issue with this: an enemy without eyes. the sumy teroborona destroyed the russian surveillance complex by
disqualified him from the election, the supreme court of the united states is considering trump's appeal today, well, i think that it is unlikely that the supreme court will uphold the decision of the supreme court of the state of colorado, but regarding criminal cases , the first trial will be on march 25, so let's see. what will happen next, let's hope, thank you, igor eisenberg, professor of new york university, there was espresso, and we talked about the difficult situation that is...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so this court of appeals rejects that. those are the three big prongs of this case. >> i want to follow up on the middle part there. it might have to do with whether the supreme court decides to weigh in here. there have been this range, you know, of decisions now. in state courts, in different federal courts here, that deal with the issue for donald trump and others involved with what happened on january 6th, where their actions part of their federal jobs. >> right. >> or were they outside the scope of their federal jobs? 100% of the rulings at the state level and every federal level has ruled that they were outside the scope of their jobs. there's been unanimity in this. given how unanimous this has been at every level broadly speaking and i think the stringent language we're seeing in this panel ruling, does this make it less likely that the supreme court will get involved? >> i think it does. it's still 100%. we have one more example of a court forcefully rejecting the notion of what donald trump did, mark meadows trie
so this court of appeals rejects that. those are the three big prongs of this case. >> i want to follow up on the middle part there. it might have to do with whether the supreme court decides to weigh in here. there have been this range, you know, of decisions now. in state courts, in different federal courts here, that deal with the issue for donald trump and others involved with what happened on january 6th, where their actions part of their federal jobs. >> right. >> or...
0
0.0
Feb 18, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the company's employees wrote an appeal to the supreme court of ukraine to seek justice. veronika is an employee of the poltava mining and processing plant. her family has been working at this enterprise for several generations. her husband, who now defends ukraine in the ranks of the armed forces, worked with her at the plant. a woman does not know what to do if there is no work. if our enterprise stops, 7 thousand, if not more people will be left without funds. that is, it means that i, a person who was born here, grew up, where are my parents, i will have to go from here, where should i go. please protect us. poltava mining and processing plant is a city-forming enterprise. the trade union of the enterprise emphasizes that such an illegal court decision can destroy the plant and deprive people of the opportunity to work and receive wages , and the state - taxes. in the event of a shutdown of the enterprise, the city and its inhabitants will have no means of livelihood. this will have catastrophic consequences not only for the workers, but for the entire country. after
the company's employees wrote an appeal to the supreme court of ukraine to seek justice. veronika is an employee of the poltava mining and processing plant. her family has been working at this enterprise for several generations. her husband, who now defends ukraine in the ranks of the armed forces, worked with her at the plant. a woman does not know what to do if there is no work. if our enterprise stops, 7 thousand, if not more people will be left without funds. that is, it means that i, a...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
will that effect any type of appeal to the supreme court? >> it really depends.is the first time a court has ever found that a president is not immune from federal, criminal prosecution for acts committed during office. and so because of the nature of that of this and future ability to govern. it's possible the supreme court weighs. in they don't have to. the supreme court has full stretion as to whether they take up the case or not. they typically take up less than 1% of the petitions submitted to them each year. it's really up in the air as to whether or not the supreme court is going to get involved in this or not. >> brian: can you give us the procedure they put, you know better than me, some type of a time limit when they can go up. the president, they want to rush the president to court. the president wants to take his time, obviously. so, they put some type of time limit on his appeal. >> they did. the d.c. appeals court says he has by monday to decide whether he is going to appeal or not and if he in writing submits to the federal appeals court that just
will that effect any type of appeal to the supreme court? >> it really depends.is the first time a court has ever found that a president is not immune from federal, criminal prosecution for acts committed during office. and so because of the nature of that of this and future ability to govern. it's possible the supreme court weighs. in they don't have to. the supreme court has full stretion as to whether they take up the case or not. they typically take up less than 1% of the petitions...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they give them one week to request the supreme court hear their appeal, and of course, this puts theline of the federal election interference case up in the air here, and we are talking about a potential decision if the court were to take it up, and judge chutkan said with the stay in place both sides will be granted the full amount of time to prepare for the case, and with the stay in place that furthers the delay, putting it in jeopardy if the supreme court were to take up the appeal, would it come before the election. and the ramifications of that would be extensive, and if the hush-money payment trial in new york were to go forward, those are state charges and donald trump could not pardon himself. when you are looking at this politically for donald trump, winning the white house is paramount to him, and we in our new nbc news polling here, there's a clear indication that the american electorate looks at donald trump differently if he were to have a felony conviction next to his name. the head to head match-up to joe biden shows donald trump with the five-point lead nationally, a
they give them one week to request the supreme court hear their appeal, and of course, this puts theline of the federal election interference case up in the air here, and we are talking about a potential decision if the court were to take it up, and judge chutkan said with the stay in place both sides will be granted the full amount of time to prepare for the case, and with the stay in place that furthers the delay, putting it in jeopardy if the supreme court were to take up the appeal, would...
0
0.0
Feb 23, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on the 26th of february 2021, the united kingdom supreme court held that the secretary of state had actedin refusing ms begum leave to enter the united kingdom for the purposes of her appeal to siac. she elected to proceed with that appeal notwithstanding that she could not give evidence or be physically present. on the 22nd of february, 2023, siac dismissed ms begum's appeal against the deprivation decision. the issue in this appeal and for us is whether siac was right to conclude that the deprivation decision was lawful. ms begum put forward five grounds of appeal, ground one, out of the four, the first round was that the secretary of state had failed to consider whether ms begum had been a potential victim of trafficking, for the purposes of sexual exploitation and that this failure breach the obligations owed to her under article four of the european convention on human rights. siac had found that there was, at the very least, a "credible suspicion" that she had been traffic for such purposesin she had been traffic for such purposes in 2015. it was not argued for us that this created
on the 26th of february 2021, the united kingdom supreme court held that the secretary of state had actedin refusing ms begum leave to enter the united kingdom for the purposes of her appeal to siac. she elected to proceed with that appeal notwithstanding that she could not give evidence or be physically present. on the 22nd of february, 2023, siac dismissed ms begum's appeal against the deprivation decision. the issue in this appeal and for us is whether siac was right to conclude that the...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so, the question here, of course, is, they are going to appeal this to the supreme court. it's a matter of when they decide to do so, by next monday based on what we're hearing, but then of course it's what argument they'll present to the supreme court given they have a 57-page ruling basically undercutting every defense they've offers do far. >> i have the benefit of having you here, and i really want to get your political brain on this, about what we've seen even in the last couple weeks with poll after poll coming out that shows that, as much as the legal issues have been a benefit to the former president in his campaign in the short term, not so much if, in fact, he does become the republican nominee and looking a tt long term and how people view him as a candidate for president again. is that penetrating at all inside the campaign? >> yeah. it's a concerning thought for them, because it's exactly what bill barr, nikki haley, you know, former vice president mike pence, ron desantis, all of these people who have been critical of trump or his actions, have said, sure, th
so, the question here, of course, is, they are going to appeal this to the supreme court. it's a matter of when they decide to do so, by next monday based on what we're hearing, but then of course it's what argument they'll present to the supreme court given they have a 57-page ruling basically undercutting every defense they've offers do far. >> i have the benefit of having you here, and i really want to get your political brain on this, about what we've seen even in the last couple...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court of appeals of did and we don't need to take this to the supreme court. if the court declines to hear this, this would be the reezlution, this is good, and let's move on. so he could do that. we'll see whether the court accepts that as the course of action it chooses to follow, but it's one thing jack smith could do to nudge things along. >> this will certainly be one of the most important moments of 2024 as to when this trial occurs. we're so grateful to msnbc contributor barbara mcquade starting us off this morning. her book attack from within how disinformation is sabotaging america is due out february 27th. thank you, barbara, we'll talk to you again soon. >>> elsewhere in washington the gop led house has failed to impeach homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas. republicans fell just one vote short yesterday. three members of the gop joined the democrats in voting against the articles. they are ken buck of colorado, tom mcclintock of california, and wisconsin congressman mike gal dpr. vice chair of the gop conference, blake moore also flipped
court of appeals of did and we don't need to take this to the supreme court. if the court declines to hear this, this would be the reezlution, this is good, and let's move on. so he could do that. we'll see whether the court accepts that as the course of action it chooses to follow, but it's one thing jack smith could do to nudge things along. >> this will certainly be one of the most important moments of 2024 as to when this trial occurs. we're so grateful to msnbc contributor barbara...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
circuit court of appeals. don't really see the united states supreme court wanting to show the vision on this question. in other words, i'm not sure that there's an opinion that all nine justices could sign on to that would, you know, who essentially be something that all of them could agree on. i suspect there is some people in the court who want to side with trump on at least a few points. but there's no way that the majority of the court is going to say that donald trump, you know, can murder, rape, and pillage without any consequences. so i think you're just gonna let the d.c. circuit court of appeals ruling stand. and then, that would ultimately allow the trial to go forward. >> you used the word comprehensive. let me throw out the word unanimous. it was a unanimous vote. so when something is a unanimous vote, typically, does the supreme court take that up? i mean, a divided vote, perhaps is more likely, right? >> well, typically, alex, the supreme court doesn't take case at all. i mean, they take a very,
circuit court of appeals. don't really see the united states supreme court wanting to show the vision on this question. in other words, i'm not sure that there's an opinion that all nine justices could sign on to that would, you know, who essentially be something that all of them could agree on. i suspect there is some people in the court who want to side with trump on at least a few points. but there's no way that the majority of the court is going to say that donald trump, you know, can...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the things that the circuit court did was say that he wanted to appeal to the supreme court, he hadusually it is 90 days. they said if you live it until monday, and they don't. they're just going to lift the stay. so i think he has some decisions to make regarding how he wants to approach it. i think he's going to appeal to the supreme court. >> you don't think they would take it up? >> i do not. it is a very tight, and narrow ruling. and i do not think that the supreme court would be looking to take it up, a 30 decision, that in fact i think is the correct decision. >>> christie weighed in on a lingering campaign issue. why he would not try to help nikki haley defeat donald trump. >> would it have helped if you had endorsed her? >> i do not know. i don't know how much endorsements really matter, quite frankly. but that was it really the way i made that decision. >> reporter: you're still not willing to endorse her? >> no. >> why? >> because she is not running against donald trump. and i think the people who support me in this enterprise expect that if i'm going to support someone,
of the things that the circuit court did was say that he wanted to appeal to the supreme court, he hadusually it is 90 days. they said if you live it until monday, and they don't. they're just going to lift the stay. so i think he has some decisions to make regarding how he wants to approach it. i think he's going to appeal to the supreme court. >> you don't think they would take it up? >> i do not. it is a very tight, and narrow ruling. and i do not think that the supreme court...
0
0.0
Feb 13, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
then a court of appeals. and then to the supreme court. at one of the time, would be lightning speed. it is probably within a year. so, and court that is quick. but when the supreme court decides and the federal judges decide that they want to decide something because it's urgent, they will do it. now, there are many reasons why perhaps the supreme court doesn't want to rush to a judgment in this case. they would prefer to have this decided at a later time. i think the supreme court is not immune from politics. it's our most political court, and our most learned court. we shouldn't expect that they may be immune from looking at the landscape and looking at the consequences of their decisions. >> we will all be watching closely, we enjoy having you on and talking about all of this. thank you so much for tracking me to this evening. we appreciate. it coming, up you're looking at a video of the federal courthouse in florida today. a high stakes hearing on his classified documents case. we will tell you what happened and talk about -- the pers
then a court of appeals. and then to the supreme court. at one of the time, would be lightning speed. it is probably within a year. so, and court that is quick. but when the supreme court decides and the federal judges decide that they want to decide something because it's urgent, they will do it. now, there are many reasons why perhaps the supreme court doesn't want to rush to a judgment in this case. they would prefer to have this decided at a later time. i think the supreme court is not...