i think it's a waste of money with all these labels. i have never in my life read a label. in perfect health. i am healed and well my mother is 91. she never counted calories and she never read a label. we eat what we want when we want and my mother is in fantastic hell. host: what's your secret? [laughter] caller: if you believe you will receive. what you say you will have. that is my secret. host: what is your question for t?r guess? caller caller: i agree on not changing the labels. with my health and my mother's health, we never read labels and never counted calories and never did any of these things. it's just a statement. host: thank you. guest: congratulations. host: can that be applied across the board? guest: i don't think so, i think people want to eat healthier. six out of 10 americans want to eat healthier and four out of five a there diet is not healthy so we need some help. i would start with the front of the package labels. you can take that information and combine it into one simple and say this product is healthier than the next and that would be a simple t

our tags have a score you have front of package labeling, you have the larger back of package label,ou're talking about a lot of labels on one single food. frankly, you could put a label across the front just like a tobacco product that says this product will make you obese and i promise you people are still going to make that -- still going to buy that product if they want it. i think you're arguing apples and oranges here. everyone wants people to be healthier but in the end they'll et what they want to eat. doesn't matter what you put on there. they're going to get what their taster is set for. mr. guthrie: i'm one, i almost never pick up something that has that label on it and not read the calories. i come from wanning the calories but let's do it in a reasonable way. mr. pitts: the chair recognizes the gentleman, mr. schrader. mr. schrader: thank you. i guess for dr. wootan and ms. raskopf, and to everyone, obviously this rule is not ready for prime time. we have considerable discussion about what it's going to do how it will be implemented, i understand that. although the rules

patti labelle and the blue belles, labelle, all of the iterations of your--. >> of my life? >> of your group. >> yes. >>the commercial success there was much greater than anything you have--. >> yes. >> attained since. i'm wondering, do you ever look back and wonder, "well, maybe i shoulda just stuck with this and did my other thing on the side". no? >> no. not at all. i had no, i rarely, rarely look backward. it's just kind of not in my d.n.a. and i'm, you know, what i have done, i'm really, really, really grateful to have been a part of. >> who decided to break up? >> patti. patti wanted to go on her own. and--. >> what did you think about that at the time? >> well, it was painful. i mean, you know. we did--. >> were you angry? >> n-- i could say angry or really disappointed. and there's a difference between disappointed and angry. disappointed and, disappointed and kind of at a loss. kind of, well-- th-- this is what i've been for 17 years. what, what am i now? and so disappointed. disappointed that we couldn't-- and i don't know, when i say "we couldn't," i don't even kn

labeling, allergen labeling, bioterrorism and recordkeeping and proposed updates to the nutrition facts panel. we also have our own safety and quality standards that go beyond these laws. the last thing we want is someone to get sick from the food in our grocery stores. you might ask how is this related to what we are talking about today. these are all related to the supermarket industry and where we devote time and resources. they are regulations that are not applied to chain restaurants. when the f.d.a. takes a chain restaurant menu labeling law and stretches it out to grocery stores on top of the other laws that we comply with and abide with, it shouldn't surprise anyone that the glove simply doesn't fit. we are committed to aiding our customers and making healthy choices and i will highlight three of those things we are doing. we with other grocers have a healthy initiatives departments that make informed decisions about healthy eating, something we didn't have to do but it's the right thing to do. we invested significant resources in the scoring system, a system that gives a zero t

but while our diets have changed, the labels have not. the fda says there is now a shift to focus on calories to help consumers construct healthy diets. >> the hope with the new label is that the calories perceiving will be prominently displayed right at the top so you know from the start what a serving is. >> reporter: health advocates are lobbying for other ways to help, clearer measurements not just in grams but in teaspoons and serving sizes that make sense. the fda will not say exactly what the revised labels will look like or when you will see them in your kitchen. but likely they will release recommendations in the next few months. >> when we look at the history we know more and more people are starting to look at labels. so they're looking there for a reason. so we want to make sure they look at the labels and make healthier choices. >> reporter: the usda estimates that 42% of working adults read the labels always or most of the time. older adults use them 57% of the time. >> so i think there are definitely a lot of important bits

but while our diets have changed, the labels have not. the fda says there is now a shift to focus on calories to help consumers construct healthy diets. >> the hope with the new label is that the calories perceiving will be prominently displayed right at the top so you know from the start what a serving is. >> reporter: health advocates are lobbying for other ways to

senator, let me start with you, this label no letters to the justice department says this no labels partisan partisan and often unlawful conspiracy involving individuals both inside and outside the government to deny americans their constitutional right to choose the leaders who represent them. no labels has ballot access now on 14 states, if you look at the map, kansas recognized the party status today. what are you alleging here? >> well, we are alleging that these -- this crowd, mostly democrats, unfortunately, they think they are just doing something that is in a political campaign, but, really, they are denying us and the american people the right to have a third choice on the ballot this year, which looks like a majority of people want, got to be trump and biden. we presented evidence on tape today of things that people in this group have said, which are outrageous. the reality is that they're beginning to act -- they are acting like the republicans they accuse of playing dirty. and it just doesn't go. they are violating our constitutional right to try to open up a third choice ballot

in support of country of origin labeling. caller: i really believe labels is the only way to go.lmost feel like he is working for the non-labeling people. the main part about this, they don't have the vegetables lying there -- in the wintertime, that thing doesn't get grown in the country. it gets grown in another country. our bananas come from wherever. everything in the wintertime comes from some other country. i don't want to mess that up. as far as the meat, look at the chickens that are being killed. because of what? because they are unsafe. what is really going on, we need that labeling because i don't know if you've had a texas or mexican mesquite eating cow but they don't taste near as good as a canadian one that is fed grain. or an american one fed grain. this is not an issue that is talking about our safety as much as just who wants to make some more money without the people actually knowing what is going on. guest: i don't think people are actively trying to withdraw information from consumers. the main issue is trying to avoid that retaliation. i can assure you, i'm n

didn't have any wsndatory labeling requirement. >> reporter: mur's pushing a bill to make the labeling more explicit. but no of this will matter if aquabounty's salmon end up in restaurants or similar institutions because no labeling is required there. in the meantime, aquabounty's gearing up production at its indiana facility, and its salmon could hit the u.s. market as early as the fall of 2020. >> sreenivasan: chile-- already a leader in latin america for encycling, low co2 emissions, and other envirol measures-- will host the next united nations' global climate change conference this december. as lawmakers work roll out environmental initiatives ahead of the conference, a new food recycling initiative er way in one of santiago's poorest neighborhood >> each week the la pintana neighborhood collects roughly 140 tons of plant-based food wn te, much more tin many other parts of sanago. as part of a -fgovernmentunded program, workers in community recycling trucks, travel through la pintana's streets, handing out waste managent bins, collecting plastic bags of plant-based food waste han

group and people say why no labels?g it out there as a middle ground. but, they wonder whether this has the legs. it's only on four or five states depending on how ask the ballots so far. they aspire to 35-40 but who knows. >> the most serious independent candidate in my lifetime was ross perot he got almost 2 # 0% of the vote but no electoral votes. he influenced the -- helped influence the outcome of the election '92 and '96. i'm not sure if no labels can generate the kind of supporters dana and martha and larry say in the fall. can they get us back to some common set of goals, consensus big issues conflating the country. ross perot if he could have negotiated support behind him maybe it would have turned out differently. maybe no labels looks at it this way if they determine they can't win. one thing that enjowrges me can't win. did they can win that will figure in their calculus as well. >> getting to common ground, getting to these issues. >> a show i like called "common ground." >> bret: segment and podcast by the

what on earth is no labels? is it a third party effort to kind of ship wreck the republicans and the democrats. is it a bunch of mushy moderates to get together to take over the world? none of the above. come to find that it is a group that respects the fact that we have a two-party system. they are endeavoring to change the center of gravity away from acrimony from the problem solving. it's a lofty objective, can it be done? for those of you who have been around politics for a while, many of you have, of course you can change the operating culture of politics. that in a nutshell is what no labels is endeavoring to do. our goal is to change the operating environment of politics here in washington and certainly among the state capitols because we know many of you have some of the same problems of grid lock. and sort of the blame game and extreme partisanship that we have here in washington. our objective is to change the operating environment of politics -- lofty and aspirational, no question about it. critical f

started online selling packs of 45 durableses, personalized labels. they received tens to final orders a day and then out of blue, hundreds at one time. and i called and said we have a virus. what's going on? and he looked at many he and said it is not a virus. those are orders it was featured in an e-mail news letter and things started to stick. >> i remember making myself count to five and then refresh. and we had to go days and days to make them of. >> within four years, the part time business became a full-time job for all of them. they moved out of basement into these 14,000 square foot facility. by 2016, mabel's label hs 40 employees and sales of about $9.5 million canadian neefrlly $7.25 million u.s. it caught the attention of one of the largest specialty labeling companies in the world, cc industries which made they will an offer. >> they really understood our brand. they've been watching us for a long time. so we sold the company. >> they continued to run it while they became general manager. the two co-founders cashed out. now the business p

label it.re asking is to label it. >> transparency. >> i just want to know. >> i think it's key that you you guys have made freedom and a free society a bedrock sort of foundation in the strategy here. that always trips up people. >> states' rights. >> exactly. wave the flag. chef, thank you as always for your time. >>> for more information and to sign the food policy action petition, go to stop the dark act.com. that is all for now. i'll see you back here tomorrow at 4:00 p.m. eastern. the ed show is up next. >>> good evening, americans. welcome to the ed show live from miami, florida. i'm ready to go. let's get to work. >> voters going to the polls to pick their gop candidates to replace former congressmen trey radel. >> the 19th district. >> today republican voters will decide between these four candidates. after the fight over who is more conservative, all that money is spent and thoses thatinasty ads comes

those nutrition labels are so often inaccurate. we generally eat much more than the serving size suggests. now the labels are getting a makeover, and the first lady was a driving force for change. she talked to the "today" show's jenna bush hager. >> my hope is this will be another piece in the puzzle towards creating that new norm and how we raise healthy kids. >> reporter: here is what an existing nutrition label looks like, and here is a new proposed label, including bigger and more accurate calorie and serving information. for example, the 20 ounce bottle soda that may have said two serves at 120 calories each, becomes one serving at 240 calories. the pint of ice cream offering four servings at 240 calories each becomes just two serves at 480 calories each. also on the new labels, manufacturers will have to include added sugars, the so-called hidden sugars getting so much of the blame for america's obesity epidemic. how much of a villain are added sugars? >> well, we are over-adding things like sugar that are linked to things l

genetically labeled animals. what it would not do is label meet from genetically engineered feed. >> not one country in the world required labeling for genetically engineered feed. when we eat that, we're not genetically engine neared. 522 is leading but not much, one race too close to call but voters agree on one thing. they are sick of hearing about it. >> it's a lot of money going into a big waste. >> too many of them. >> for "nightly business report", jane wells. >>> finally tonight, an update on a story we told you about last night, the kick off to the busy fall auction season that christi is in new york city and the bidding was a bit of burst. the 62 works of art up for sale from the private collection of a swiss dealer, 17 of them left unsold and the total take for the night was $92 million, far short of the $147 million on the low-end of estimates. >> so you can get the balloon dog -- >> i want the balloon dog -- but i'm worried about the lawn. the lawn and dog -- >> that does it for us tonight on "nightl

their label says so. bugged by more than ants? get ortho bug b gon. the label tells the story. some weed killers are overzealous. they even destroy your lawn. ortho weed b gon kills weeds... not lawns. our label says it. your grass proves it. get ortho weed b gon. the label tells the story. - good journalism is about telling a story from more than one perspective. embracing diversity can enrich your story by allowing you to see things from more than just one point of view. that's a story worth telling. the more you know. >>> it was is scene yesterday afternoon at around 2:00.

launched online, selling packs of 45 durable personalized labels for about $21 each. they received about ten to 15 orders a day, and then out of the blue, hundreds at one time. >> i called the foosball guy slash website developer and said, what is going on? he said, there's no virus, those are orders. >> reporter: turns out their product had been featured in an e-mail newsletter and things really started to stick. >> i remember making myself count to five and then hitting f5 for refresh and more had come in. it was crazy. we had to call in sick for our day jobs to make these labels. >> reporter: within four years, this part-time business became a full-time job for all of them. they moved out of the basement and into this 14,000 square foot facilities. by 2016, they had 40 employees and sales of $9.5 million canadian. that's nearly 7.25 million u.s. bucks. it caught the attention of one of the largest specialty packaging and label companies in the world, cce industries, which made them an offer. >> they understood our brand. they had been watching us for a long time. w

labeling.y have a right to know what is in their food. the overwhelming majority of the american people, democrats and republicans, all favor clear, mandatory g.m.o. labeling. i got a radical idea. why don't we give them what they want? why don't we just put it on the package? it doesn't cost anymore. the idea this is an effort that will raise food prices is ridiculous. this convoluted, complicated labeling system outlined in this bill, if that's not going to raise food prices, then a simple in plain english listing on food that says this contains g.m.o.'s will certainly not list -- certainly not raise food prices. mr. speaker, sooner or later we're going to get clear, mandatory g.m.o. labeling. i prefer sooner and therefore i urge my colleagues to reject this bill and let's give the american consumer what they want. i yield back my time. the speaker pro tempore: the time of the gentleman has expired. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. conaway: mr. speaker, i recognize myself for one m

by the way, sean, call themselves no labels. that's the label. they're no labels. and they have a great platform, they don't know what they stand for and you don't get to find out, only that they want to get things done. what i notice, these are washed up millionaire x democrat inside politicians, huntsman, manchin, and they say we're going to get things done. people are sick of g gridlock. i notice, sean, you're going without a tie. what's that about? >> sean: you're a trendsetter. >> all right. let me go on. save on the shampoo, by the way. here's the thing. our constitution is set up to slow everything down. they keep saying we want to get things done. the problem in this country is we're getting too many things done, too many things done that are k damaging our country and society, damaging the rule of law, damaging immigration. you have a lawless president in the oval office who is signing executive orders, doesn't k know, the next one, next one, signing them out. you have lawless courts imposing their will. you have a massive administrative state putting out

says uses nutrition facts labels. showed him what the new labels will look like. >> for me, the first thing i see is the calorie count. that's definitely a huge difference. and, also, the serving size. i think that's really smart. >> reporter: compliance will be required two years from today, and manufacturers with less than $10 million in annual food sales will have an additional year to comply. charlie, nutrients like vitamin "d" and potassium will also appear on the labels. >> rose: more information for the consumer. >> reporter: absolutely. >> rose: thanks, jericka. the largest frozen food recall ever was announced today. millions of packages of fruits and vegetables from c.r.f. frozen foods in washington state may be contaminated with listeria. the products were sold in all 50 states as far back as 2014. we have posted a full list of the recalled food on cbsnews.com. we got word late today that actor alan young has died. >> i can't help it, wilbur. i just love that man's apple. >> why does it have to be his! >> r

that's what no labels is about. a citize saying maybe we have true try something else. >> to the point you made, does that mean a republican like yu yourself in your mold should be at the top of a no labels ticket? >> we should only put together a ticket in the event it's trump and biden. again, i'm still trying to work and make sure we can get a good republican nominee and this is no longer necessary. it has to be a good ticket that can actually win. i would only be in it to win it. nobody is trying to spoil anything. this is about actually receiving a majority of the votes. the last time we had somewhat of a successful third-party run, ross perot who dropped out and had problems and came back in and still at about 20%. he was a republican who ran as an independent. he drew from both sides, but didn't hurt the democrat. it hurt the republican. >> the ross perot experience he gets 19% of the popular vote, but it's difficult to win the white house in a system that's the electoral college. >> it's very true. you know,

of origin labeling. and i think -- i don't know how the baby got thrown out with the bath water here. but if mr. mcgovern said he was looking for a compromise. and i've been looking for a compromise too. i think if we had a voluntary program to replace the mandatory program, it would certainly satisfy the constraints of the world trade organization. and i find it a little bit ironic that we're sitting here in congress trying to make our laws compliant with another country's laws. but if that's the goal, then i think the 2005 bill would do that. and so what i've done is to offer that bill. and again, i want to list speaker boehner, chairman conaway, chairman sessions, mrs. fox, who is not here, and mr. mchenry were sponsors of this bill. i want to offer this in the nature of a substitute. there was one thing i had to change. in we weren't going to repeal it 2005, for chicken. and for some reason in 2015 we decided chicken needs to be repealed. i said ok, we'll repeal it for chicken. but we need to also ha

they are not labeled. wanted to avoid to medically modified foods, i would have to eat organic and -- if i wanted to avoid genetically modified foods, i would have to eat organic and buy organic. other kinds of production values that are think are important. me.s not an issue for in the supermarket when i am by , most ofd vegetables them are not genetically modified. the only one i know about is the papaya from hawaii. they are perfectly acceptable to buy. without labeling, you cannot make a choice. from ohio,is dave democrats' line. caller: i heard on the news that the government is required that wherere supposed to label the animals were raised and where the crops are growing. why are they doing this? you are referring to country of origin labeling, which went into effect, finally, a couple of years ago. that is supposed to tell you the food was produced in so that if you want to buy american, you will know which foods were produced in america or which foods were produced elsewhere or if you care how far

, calorie labeling. taking a look at some of your phone calls. how has this affected you? orld you change how you eat why food in a store? say yes this has been a help to you as a consumer, and if not different lines. let us know what you think you can also tweet us c-span. we also have the question on our facebook page we show those comments and a minute or let's couldn't chat, going from indiana. caller: hello? host: you're on the air. go ahead. i think mcdonald's food has way too much fat in it. the labels helped, knowing how many calories are in that food? caller: yeah. host: has it changed what you have bought? a small french fry, and it usually order a sweet tea. has it changed what you buy? caller: yeah. i try to buy things that are healthier. host: does its three away from a restaurant like mcdonald's which has higher calorie food? caller: yeah. host: you are glad to see those calories printed out for you? caller: yes. very much so. we are going to get another caller, cindy in lawnmowers, iowa. c

no labels had no convictions. nancy jacobson, one. key principles in the entire movement and effort, the last two weeks we've seen what no labels wants to be about and what politics of the last two years has been about. we've gotten things done. you repealed don't ask, don't tell. key civil rights victory for the country. you extend the tax cuts. hopefully the senate will come back and act on start. they didn't move forward on the dream act but you are getting things done. if you look the other way and you look at rush -- i wouldn't put frank rich and rush in the same group but i understand what you're saying. >> conservatives say the same thing on the other side. guess what? when frank rich -- stop for a second. i like frank rich. if frank rich is going to compare republicans to the ku klux klan or have illustrations where they are in nazi hoods or klan hoods, he's in that neighborhood. that's fine if that's how he wants to generate buzz in the best real estate that there is in newspaper, that's his business and

labels are handy, okay?e a label, i know whether to agree with you or reject your ideas before you ever open your mouth. >> exactly right. that's the problem. >> stephen: i need to know what are you a democrat or republican? you've worked for both. >> i'm a progressive republican. i'm trying to remain in the republican party. >> stephen: a progress republican? what are you talking about? >> it's lonely but i'm fighting got fight. it's democrats and independents involved in the movement because we think we should be put our labels aside and make congress work again. they are not getting anything done. we face our greatest challenges every and our system is paralyzed by hyperpartisanship. >> stephen: okay but if -- [cheers and applause] so -- but the american people clearly do want hyperpartisanship because they keep electing hyperpart sans. do you think you know more than the americanç people? [ laughter ] you will admit they keep electing hyperpart sans. >> they do because -- >> stephen: are you calling the

you say they have to do things to fix the label. the label has been in place since 2001.t a scientist, but that doesn't seem like that's that hard to do. >> kessler: and it needs to be done. >> thompson: we got a real problem here. >> whitaker: ed thompson isn't waiting. he has now joined a growing movement of doctors, lawyers, and patient activists who want big pharma to kick its addiction to opioid profits. that's why he made the decisione f.d.a. if you succeed, you could pull down a multi-billion-dollar industry. >> thompson: and if i fail, you're going to have ever- increasing deaths every day, as well. it's a pretty good decision, isn't it? >> cbs money watch sponsored by capital one. what's in your wallet? >> good evening. president trump announced tonight he is delaying an increase in tariffs on chinese imports as a result of productive trade talks. fed chair jerome powell talks about the economy to u.s. lawmakers on tuesday. and california's pg and e wants to cut millions in employee bonuses after its bankruptcy filing. i'm david begnaud, cbs news. when you retire

put up the map that no labels presents. we're in it to win it. here it comes. they have a scenario where they think there are 25 states they think they can win. there it is. i don't know, who the hell knows? i said at the outset the only thing any of us knows for sure is that we have no idea which way this is going to go. i've been paying attention for more than 30 years. i've never seen a cycle with the unpredictability as the one that is commencing now. in any event, go vote at smerconish.com on this week's poll question. here it is. i want to know if you're open to the idea, are you open to the idea, i'm not asking are you going to vote for because we don't know who the candidates are. but are you open to the idea of voting for a no labels third-party candidate? go check that in and out. >>> still to come, in a controversial move many states are relaxing child labor laws saying it's a way to tackle the shortage of workers. some are even letting underage kids serve alcohol in restaurants. could this prove an unlikely fix

. >> brennan: so if you get labeled as a socialist? >> it's just wrong >> brennan: would you call yourself a proud capitalist? >> >> the label, i'm not sure if any of those fit. >> brennan: our ed o'keefe asks massachusetts senator elizabeth warren about her proposal the break up big technology companies. and we'll hear from former colorado governor john hickenlooper. and as washington awaits developments into the investigation of the trump administration and the 2016 campaign, the president's former personal attorney, michael cohen, defends himself against accusations that he has lied to congress for a second time. >> i have never asked for nor would i accept a pardon from president trump. >> michael cohen lied about the pardon. that's a stone-cold lie. >> brennan: the president later tweeted that cohen directly asked me for a pardon. i said. no we'll talk to former acting f.b.i. director, andrew mccabe, and a key presidential defender on the senate judiciary committee, louisiana's john kennedy. plus we'll have analysis on all the new

was in favor of gmo-labeling.yourdo not need to step on toes here, but let's try to be brief. can you wait until the mike that there? gmos, and it is impossible where i am not to grow gmos. it is impossible. in missouri. it is impossible not to grow them, because if we do not use gmos, they will get pollinated by trucks that go by. we don't want to grow them, but we have no choice. it is cross pollinated, we grow it anyway. with all of us farmers growing gmos across the midwest world crops are grown, where is all this non-gmos product coming from? >> let me restate the question. the question was, farmers were trying to grow non-gmo crops form loadingseed into their crops. how do you grow them? >> i think your challenge is a real one. what you are talking about in terms of eliminating gmos and not as labeling organic food is completely doing the distribution system. been movingt has and goes froms one field to another, it is a separate distribution system that is needed. especially when you get into products where

the side that wants to label genetically labelled stuff raised about $8 million, with about 70% of itaised out of state. sounds like a lot, right? look at the other side, the don't label side. the we don't want to know side, they raised $22 million, and they raised all of it from out of state. actually, i should modify that. of the $22 million they raised, they raised $550 in washington state. not $550,000, $550 out of 22 million, which means that pie is not to scale. 10,000 people from across washington state contributed to the yes, contributed to the yes on labelling side. basically, nobody from washington state contributed to the no on labelling side. but the no side had such a huge tide of corporate money behind them, from bayer and dow agra sciences, and dupont, and basically no one was on the company's side in the fight. but those companies put so much money into it that they totally swamped the other side. and the modified food issue appears to have failed. it was dr. bronner and 10,000 donors across the state against coke and pepsi, yeah, the coke and pepsi side looks like the

despite that less than inspiring message, no labels has some pretty ambitious plans.nts to run the so-called centrist candidate for president, and while no ray labels may call itself bipartisan, it's obvious to anyone paying attention this is the plan could help reelect donald trump by siphoning moderate voters away from joe biden, the only candidate who has a substantial base of moderate voters. but don't take my word for. it listen to one of the group's former top advisers, who quit this year over the plan to run a third party candidate. >> i do not believe that an independent bipartisan third party ticket has any chance of success in 2024. i fear that despite its intentions to the contrary, if it proceeds, it will end up helping donald trump. >> the republican senator mitt romney of utah. said effectively the same thing, telling the hill unequivocally, quote, the no labels effort would elect donald trump. going on to say, quote, i asked my chief strategist, what it can didn't have to be like in order to draw voters from donald trump as opposed to drying from joe bi

they are not reading the labels. do read the label, it's very good and the gives you information.ee and i think more focus needs to be made on the carbohydrates area. from the information i have been reading, carbohydrates is a big problem with the american consumer. the common thread i see in all of this is the food industry, not the restaurants but the people that make the food, the packaging people, the adm's, the whole group that of people and they are the common thread through all of this and really no push is being put on them. a nudge yes, but you have to do a push. if you can get them to start pulling out the high fructose corn syrup and all the sugars of start getting people off these foods, it will help extremely well. thirdly, maybe schools need to go back to the home economics and teach people how to beat once again vs not eating properly. guest: thank you. a lot of great comments. let me start with saying that i do agree when you are in the supermarket, there is a plethora of items that we have to choose from. 21,000 new products are entered into our food supply every