simenon, public, and disclosed. >> we have a motion to approve and this has been seconded. thank you very much. >> and now we will go to jimmy. we're going to item number seven, golden gate park speedway meadow. jef>> good afternoon. my apologies for being late. we're back to present the resolution, we hope, on the cold color pigment. we had come to you and we had adjourned this at your request. and assume responsibility on this and set up to meet with us about trying to find a compromise that will allow for this event that we learned is much loved by the public to take place, but the same time respecting and helping the park. we believe this is a compromise meeting many of these goals. let me go through some of the things that we have changed. the date is saturday, october 16. we could not do sunday, because sunday is the women's marathon. we moved this to one week later. when we have harley strickley, we have to stop watering the meadow and then there was no time to give this water. then we have time to buy -- revitalize the grass before we have to turn the water off befo

simenon, public, and disclosed. >> we have a motion to approve and this has been seconded. thank you very much. >> and now we will go to jimmy. we're going to item number seven, golden gate park speedway meadow. jef>> good afternoon. my apologies for being late. we're back to present the resolution, we hope, on the cold color pigment. we had come to you and we had adjourned this at your request.

simenon, the matter is submitted. -- seeing none, the matter is submitted. vice president goh: we heard there are three options -- the continuance if we want to look at this tonight. i suppose we could do the permit with the exception of the repairs to the foundation. or the permit holder could withdraw the permit. i did not hear if he was interested in doing that. an we carve out the foundation? >> i am not aware of the details of the basics of the appeal, but the relevant factor for this board is that the exemption for the entire project has been appealed to the board of supervisors. board practice in the past has been to continue an environment to wait for the environmental review to be finalized, until there is a final environmental review on the project. the board cannot review this project. i think mr. sanchez is correct that one option would be that if the appellate does not want to wait until the 22nd he can withdraw his permit. i think that if the board were to deny the permit that we would face the want-year bar problem. -- the one-year bar problem

simenon, public comment is closed. before we go into closed session, supervisor m irkarimi. supervisor mirkarimi: i want to refresh people's memories as to why this item is before us. it was approximately two years ago where public access, the public portion, in particular among the grouping of peg funding was slated to become an endangered species. that was quite frankly because our ability to negotiate the franchise agreement in san francisco was completely hijacked by state law, known as divca, and the federal law as well. the digital and video content act inhibited our ability to broker the kind of generation of revenue we have been used to for so many years before. when that happened, we scrambled fast to make sure that programmatic funding would still be in fused so that we would not see any loss of public access here in san francisco. in that endeavor, we learned quite a bit about the current operation, as we had come to know in its and pieces on the studio. what a costly endeavor that happened to be based on old budgets. we also heard that department of technology wa