caller: using offensive techniques instead of -- the emphasis used to be on defense. hack ande ways to pa sabotages communications and make the computers worthless. there are sites where they can tune in and given step-by-step instructions on how to build an iud. rig it so anyone trying to make an iud so it will detonate on them. that is just a comment. guest: it goes back to the offensive capabilities and the rules of cyber activities. the strategy that was unveiled yesterday by the pentagon is a silence on bad. -- is silence on that on that. two examples. russian action against estonia. host: that is it for a time. thank you for exploiting the position from the pentagon. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2011] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] y. chaplain conroy: let us pray. eternal god, we give you thanks for giving us another day. as the house gathers at the end of a difficult week, grant the members peace and calm that they might attend to the issues and policies that they continue to consider. may they honor the values and

the use of these -- the layman's definition of that. i would like to see expansion of these accounts, but i am against expansion on the back of the workers or other businesses, their competitors, that are following the rules. i am also against expansion on the backs of consumers, who are making these statements when they go to a restaurant in san francisco. thank you. commissioner kasselman: i guess i just, to follow up on that, 7% of businesses are using the hra's. we have 4000 businesses resurveyed. -- we surveyed. who is using those? , many of those businesses would even know if they are not -- how many of those businesses would even know if they are not complying? if we are taking away so much money from businesses based on substantial statistical information, that is a hard thing to justify it. supervisor campos: the interesting thing about this tete-a-tete is that it is coming directly from the businesses. we have 80% of the businesses who are meeting their obligations under help the san francisco not doing it using these accounts

and i think the federal government of germany. has given us a lot of useful and helpful. pieces of advice in this topic will not disappear or be resolved in the coming years but we're not going to give up this in the out three specs but. we think that we're approaching. some. helpful solutions in that sphere. if we talk about political risk. possibility. we know that i missed it. all we need to know who is responsible for the press and how we can. remove. or me to gates and the consequences of its. way with me to get three on different measures which will help to create. these prosecutions and we need to look at the roots of the process of the crisis. and that's what we need to increase the level of competence which is subtle eat which is now insufficient and which instantly deepened but. probably have to take several more steps in that direction to solve the problems. i think we're facing historical solutions euro is good for us all. the euro is. working in both in germany and in the european union you can't. get it i don't think without a europe without the euro and i th

first, the amendment restricts the use of funds in the bill. but none of the $118.7 billion in the overseas contingency portion of the bill are designated for libya. second, the language merely requires compliance with the war powers act but the heart of the proponent's difference with the president is a matter of interpretation about what constitutes compliance. the amendment takes us no closer to a resolution of that difference. i would oppose the amendment even if the language could accomplish what the proponent's hope for can -- what the proponents hope for. it puts us on the wrong side of the history and arab spring. it would hinder the efforts of our allies, if not making nato's mission impossible and prolonging gaddafi's tenuous hold on power. to address the matter of libya, i believe the language, similar to the language introduced in the other body by senators kerry and mccain, is the appropriate course of action at this time. this language preserves the understanding between the administration and congress, the u.s. ground forces are n

we are going to go to the approval of the proposed flexible use for educational purposes, items seven through nine of the agenda. i need a reading of items. i need a motion and a second. thank you. then a reading. >> good evening. the approval of the proposed use of state three categorical funding, whereas the inactive state budget and subsequently enacted new bill authorizes school districts, charter schools, to use funding received for any of the tier 3 categorical programs enumerated for any educational purpose under federal law. whereas the funding for any educational purposes is authorized for five years from fiscal year 2009 until 2013 conclusive, and finding that may be used for educational purposes and as a condition for the general fund, the governing board are counting on education as appropriate and shall take testimony from the public to discuss, approve, or disapprove of funding, and make explicit the purpose for which funds will be used, and whereas the governing board for san francisco county education, the regular schedule a public hearing on june 14, 2011, and whereas

all of us are cost cutters in our own way. some of us just have different priorities for what those costs ought to be cut. mr. chairman, this is a very important amendment. and this subcommittee did a very good job in reducing and saving over $9 billion on this bill alone. and this is a terrible amendment. and i hope we overwhelmingly defeat this amendment. and i yield back the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from massachusetts, mr. frank. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. mr. frank: i ask for a recorded vote. the chair: pursuant to clause 6 clause 6, rule 18, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from massachusetts, will be posted. >> i have an amendment at the desk. the clerk: amendment offered by mr. fortenberry of nebraska, at the end of the bill before the short title, insert the following, section 2, none of the funds made available by t

so we try to do the best out of the best.'ll use for the wines. we try to do the best out of the best. the story may be beautiful, but we try to sell the wine itself for the professionals. >> and tell us for those of us who are kind of learning about the trade, if you will, on the cann can can'ter itself, do you drink the entire bottle? >> yes, actually, in most cases oxygen is probablycan'ter itsel the entire bottle? >> yes, actually, in most cases oxygen is probablycan'ter itsel the entire bottle? >> yes, actually, in most cases oxygen is probablyan'ter itselfe entire bottle? >> yes, actually, in most cases oxygen is probablyter itself, d entire bottle? >> yes, actually, in most cases oxygen is probably the biggest enemy of the wine. when we make it, we need a lot of oxygen. and then we avoid the oxygen, but when we want to drink it again, the oxygen helps to open up the wine again. if it's a young wine, two hours up to even half a day. but if it's an older wine, up to it two ho between hour two hours. if we decanter, it helps. >> tell us about

of public works. this is an item that we have seen before us. i do not believe the underlying details of this proposal has changed, but i have asked the department of public works director to provide a brief recap of what we have seen. >> ed riskin, director of the department of public works. this item was before this committee and you recommended to the full board, which approved in june, a resolution for this bond. this was the board cost of finding that this was imminent capital need, and it was one that was in the public interest, one that could not be met through existing revenue sources. what is before you today is the board met at a place that measure on the ballot. it proposes to report it million dollars in general-obligation bonds that would do a number of things, but predominantly, the lion's

whether or not it addresses the issue of overtime there are appropriate uses of overtime and some of the departments have attested to using overtime as being more expensive than a straight time employee. i think that the overtime is and supervisor chu: let's go to public comment -- i think that over time is. let's go to public comment. seeing no one, public comment is closed. supervisor chiu: i move that we continue this item for a week. obviously the goal at the end of the day is to make sure that over time that we have is used well. and bringing them from 30% to discovering more folks using over and being the most efficient way to go at it. and given the past where we have had situations and i think they can continue to use that and that you can streamline reporting we have been -- supervisor chu: we have a motion and a second. can we do that without objection? item #seven foul please. >> item number 7. -- item number seven, please. >> item number 7. motion approving and exercising the final option set forth in january 1, 2012, and this is an item carry forward and do not have a rep

if this had offered solutions the rest of us have not thought of before, great. obviously, we all want to find a solution that is going to sustain our park system. without private money, that would be fabulous. but i do not hear you coming up with alternatives are solutions that would make seeking out private dollars affordable. this is a disaster. i hope he will pull it off the ballot. it is counterproductive. it is counterproductive to our fragile parks system. i urge you to pull it from the ballot. thank you. >> hello, supervisors. i am the executive director of san francisco p.a.l. i am also the parent of two young teens. we have been actively using the parks for the entire time we have been living in the city. i encourage you to reconsider this measure. i understand your intent. we want to make sure our children have access to the park and help the activities. we serve 5000 kids through 800 volunteers. our biggest expansion areas have been in omi and>> we have workey with park and ride over the past couple of years and i want to emphasize the focus of the st

make cuts if this debt ceiling is raised so what we see is just another chapter in a long walk of of us figuring of political posturing we are seeing u.s. lawmakers get in front of the cameras day after day week or fight show the fact that they can't come together and agree we see an election year that is approaching and clearly the republicans and those that are opposed to president barack obama us president obama are taking the opportunity to try to put him in a very weak and in secure position in the meantime it is compromising the u.s. economy overall since one thousand nine hundred sixty the u.s. has raised the debt ceiling seventy eight times the pattern of the u.s. economy and legislators and their structure here has been borrow and spend borrow and spend and what has created uncertainty among investors on long american citizens on wall street business owners is the fact that there's never been a plan in place on how to cut the deficit how to bring down the spending and stop borrowing. most people perspective know what's going on capitol hill of george. presidents over financial

disorders no longer want to contract with us doubling of us that they don't recognize our expertise on the earth and that is this is a serious challenge for if you get them out and eyes of us all of this aging means to understand that the foreign companies only recycle twenty percent of the lashon in familiar but we recycle eighty percent may have been at the earliest so that what they are. mined in. work is all we know then you know by these then. we have been here for one hundred years all. of the garbage has always been a work of the law. it's like gets taken from a salon and in an hour we'll be without our daily bread. and of course i'm furious that i know when october when we're the ones with the most experience and recycling my go to. thank. the much the good old of the lot and they can i look forward to foreign companies can i dreamed of owning a can cutting factory. don and i learned a lot then but we have less garbage now. and our income comes from recycling trash . and b'nai we recycle eighty percent of the trash we collect by the of. because we are we turning garbage into ro

use of medical and industrial isotopes, biofuel technology, the d.n.a. sequencing technologies, battery technology for electric vehicles. artificial retinas. safer nuclear reactor designs. three dimensional models of pathogens for vaccine development. tools to manufacture nanomaterials, sensors, the office of science has been the source of hundreds and hundreds of innovative technologies. some have become the underpinnings of modern scientific disciplines and revolutionized medicine and energy and military technology. the america competes act, passed in a very bipartisan vote here in congress in 2007, and signed into law by president george bush, recognized that we have underfunded our basic research agencies for far too long. it laid out a vision for doubling the funding at our research agencies, including the office of science. this law was re-authorized last year. the bill we are considering today woefully underfunds the office by this national goal. matching last year's funding level with an additional $42.7 million as my amendment would do is the lea

and he of that he relied on all the time was he said and of course we never actually will have to use them and this to me is the heart of the problem for the people who brought you to terence is that if they try to claim a level usenet terrorist doesn't work we're meant you would argue that terence does mean use of it is a use of a nuclear weapon to actually threaten to use them and that's when you're into the will cause the first time you've fought to get that threet you know and this isn't it it was the south pacific noise and the activists that i get to have threesome clued in their original question is if you have included threats then the. nuclear states could valued well we're only relying terrence which is threat and so we're not going to use it so i waited for him. return from here is it going to go back to the court. at the time the judges agreed unanimously on the requirement for total nuclear disarmament the activists are fighting ted that opinion on and. this is. what i understand that the lewis and others wanting to do is to use the unanimous part of the opinion and i wan

either by way of a strike or by a straight you know to mostly threat or use of force. may means of nuclear weapons and that he's going to read the article . all of the united nations charter and article fifty one is unlawful. nucular deter and says we have nuclear weapons but our goal is not to use them if. your goal is to have them at our disposal. this means that we are not in the realm of the real we are in the realm of the virtual need don't know what you're in here to and it is contrary to international law or even to have in bran's assonance this weapon because the purpose of the weapon is to use it either as a threat or as an actual weapon the nuclear powers or alliances like nato still rely on nuclear deterrence which is threat and so the fight continues i was on a panel with a senior advisor to the british government about nuclear policy and he's pro nuclear. and we were debating about. a well court opinion and whether the nuclear deterrence was legal and he was extremely cynical he said that. it was a mistake to go into court but government sort of ign

with the assistance of the australian and new zealand military. use eventis picture and study. the results demonstrated the presence of elevated chromosomal disturbances of new zealand veterans only fifty years ago so they're basically saying i have suffered any damage. we spoke recently as a national conference here on disarmament when the daughter of one of the trends spycatcher father was too ill to speak and she talked about growing up with that fear of having a child born to food and even in new zealand because of the effects of radiation from her father being exposed to nuclear tests in the pacific. and i'm lucky. i have three children. and i don't live with the think that. i was so it was normal until i got to school and sit on the mitts and go around so i would appear. and most of the kids would say i'm up as a take for news and then. and my mom tries to stop nuclear. because that's how i understood it. crane is. now working at the disarmament security center. back in the one nine hundred seventy s. when i was in and she submarine helicopters i was required to train my a

the federal government of germany. has given us a lot of useful and helpful. pieces of advice in this topic oh it will not disappear or be resolved in the coming years but we're not going to give up in this respect but. we think that we're approaching far less. helpful solutions in that sphere. if we talk about political risk. it's ability. we know that but. all we need to know who is responsible for the crisis and how we can. remove. or mitigate the consequences of its. way we need to agree on different measures which will mitigate. these consequences and i think we need to look at the roots of that process of crisis. and. we need to increase the level of competence. which is now insufficient which is to be deepened by. well you probably have to take several more steps in that direction to go through all the problems i think we're facing historical solutions the euro is good for us all. the euro is. working in both in germany and you know the european union we can't. think of us without a europe without the euro and i think that we need to take a look at the r

of public works. this is an item that we have seen before us. i do not believe the underlying details of this proposal has changed, but i have asked the department of public works director to provide a brief recap of what we have seen. >> ed riskin, director of the department of public works. this item was before this committee and you recommended to the full board, which approved in june, a resolution for this bond. this was the board cost of finding that this

the use of glass is increasing in modern design which is increasing the threat to birds. so here we have an example of reflective glass and reflections can trick birds into thinking there is a clear space ahead when there is not. transparent glass cannot be perceived and leads them to believe they can reach a destination that is not available. given the hazards of reflective and transparent glass, let's talk about solutions. on the far left, an amazing building, the lacqua tower in chicago. a combination of overhead and livers. this building has a solid appearance and on the right, we have the new yorke building that uses footed glass which is visible to birds and has aesthetic appeal. we have the skywalk with windows that appears transparent to people but as birds approach, the footing makes the glass visible. they allowed an outside view reducing the risk of bird collisions. the top left picture in the slide shows an excellent example of how well netting can work to protect resources while looking virtually invisible. this works well for repelling pest species that can d

but many of us here today, i dare say perhaps most of us here today, have no recollection at all of you as first family or, perish the thought, of the u.s. first lady. i never knew you that way. i think i can speak for thousands of us who reclaimed our lives just a few short miles from here. we never knew you that way. we knew you as mrs. ford, founder, chair, lecturer, hour our omnipresent face of recovery here in the desert, in grand rapids, in vail, on "larry king," "good morning america," so many other tv shows, and then on campus. we got to know you as betty. we saw you in the rooms. we listened to you tell stories about your own feelings, your own guilts, you're own ups, your own downs, your own memories of loneliness and fear and shame and we could relate to that, betty. we felt close to you for that. all of a sudden, it was ok for us to have those feelings because you made us understand that it did not have to be that way anymore. and so, we were embarking on this journey together with you but it was very scary. we had no clue how to operate or do anything, me without vodka. i h

but many of us here today, i dare say perhaps most of us here today, have no recollection at all of youbetty, as first family or, perish the thought, of the u.s. first lady. i never knew you that way. i think i can speak for thousands of us who reclaim our lives just a few short miles from here. we never knew you that way. we knew u.s. mrs. ford, founder, or chair, lecturer, hour upon the present phase of recovery here in the desert, in grand rapids, in vail, on larry king, "good morning, america," so many other tv shows, and then on campus. we got to know you as betty. we saw you in the rooms. we listened to you tell stories about your own feelings, your own kilts, you're on ups, your own downs, your own memories of loneliness and fear and shame and we could relate to that, betty. we felt close to you for that. all of a sudden, it was ok for us to have those feelings because you made us understand that it did not have to be that way anymore. and so, we were embarking on this journey together with you but it was very scary. we had no clue how to operate or do anything, made without vodk

of operation. can have membership. will there be limitations on the use by non-resident members, such as exists at san francisco state, and other public institution with limited hours and reservation requirements. all of this is in the four-color brochure and in representations that have been made along the line, but we saw this in the bond crisis. we saw lots of people having big piles of paperwork that were not read or not completed or not signed. how do we know that people purchasing a limited number of condos in a small site -- i have never seen a project like this where the public have access. you might find this in a community in the homeowners association where there was a golf course, and they needed to underwrite some of the expenses, so they had non-resident memberships, but you will never find it, i don't believe, in a compact residential situation. that a purchaser for $2.5 million might force the 1600 people walking in and out of their facilities. i do not believe that those homeowners would allow it, and i think the first chance at the devel

can take it away from us of. an old two story mansion in the center of gorky was the only place where andrei sakharov and yelena boehner could pay friendly calls the family of maria hein of skier elin his relatives lived in the building the high north the family had a similar story they were also in exile to go to keep by the soviet authorities forty years before those events. since the one nine hundred eighty s. k.g.b. officers over the around the yard peering through the window to monitor several visits there were times when the academics cease to believe there would ever be an end to his constant harassment. and they even found a place in gorky where they wanted to be buried there is neither of them hope to get out of this town of exile. the tension was extreme. exile sacro went on hunger strike three times for the first joined by c.n.n. and on the. local doctors received an order to hospitalize sattar of. the incident was put on record by the k.g.b. . today said it is still a local place of interest but the do

let us hope that all of us will not say, can't do this, can't do that, can't do the other. let's go down to the white house on sunday, with the president, with the senate, with the leaders of this house, and say, yes we can. we can be responsible, we can be adults, we'll get this done for the people. i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from virginia is recognized. >> mr. speaker, i -- mr. cantor: i ask unanimous consent that when the house adjourns today it adjourn to meet on monday next at 12:00 p.m. for morning hour debate an 2:00 p.m. for legislative business. the speaker pro tempore: without objection so ordered. the gentleman from virginia is recognized. mr. cantor: i ask unanimous consent that the speaker may appoint members to do the duties of the chair from august 8, 2011, to august 27 20, 11, as under clause 8 of rule 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york rise? >> i rise today to ask unanimous consent to remove myself as co-sponsor of h reform 91. the speaker pro tempore: without objecti

department of defense, military, other discretionary. so this in 2010 we used this one because this is last year's numbers, it's all done. we know what it was. and you see this, that's probably about 62%, 63% of all spending was in the mandatory category. think of this. this here from the president's own numbers is the 2016 projection, which is four budget cycles away. right now we are working on the 2012. this is the 2016. do you see the difference in these two boards? see if i can hold these up over each other. do you see that growth in that blue area? we go from something in the low 60's to 72, and i have one person keeps telling me it's 73% of all spending. think of this. in about 13 1/2 years every dime of this pie chart, every dime of spending, will be consumed by the mandatory portion of our spending. so 13 1/2 years. there's nothing left in defense. there's nothing left in the alphabet agencies. mandatory spending, the entitlements, consume everything we are. remember, this is as the law is written today. so every time you see a member walk up and say i

he does a lot of this in the city and he's come and given us one of these brown bag lunches with acoustical separation and talked about just what he's saying, using different thicknesses of material. the assembly has to go beyond the glazing, it has to be the building wall assembly that reduces outside noise. >> tempered glass is designed to take impact. that would have broken the window glass or the plate. i'm trying really hard. this doesn't want to break. let's give it a real... you know, so it's a good product. it's interesting. this center is the strongest part. the weakest part is at the edg edges. it takes quite a bit of impact, as you see. but -- in a quake, when they say don't leave the building, you know, there's a reason. you're probably better staying inside, under a desk or whatever else, because it's probably not going to be the glass that falls down but the cornice, some of the ornamental brickwork. who knows. we're likely to get hit by a power line. >> stay in the building. >> stay in the building, get under your desk. keep a bottle of scotch there for -- at all times. i cer

i was in the middle and in this picture, six of us are there. one of us is still awaiting trial. he was given and it -- the release of sentence. he was a winter of $14 million lawsuit against this man. in this matter -- is also passing this returning to help me out. what would you do? >> thank you for the chance to respond. one reason i accepted this appointment was because i believe that there are a lot of problems with the criminal justice system, i think that this is to be reformed in many ways. we have problems with prosecution misconduct, problems with police misconduct and i believe that we have wrongly incarcerated a number of people in many communities and this is something i have worked on for many years. one thing i have done, and i was appointed to it -- i have been known to say that one of the things i say in my office -- we have the structural integrity unit, and the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses, this is presented to make certain that we have the transparent and fair trial. i am aware of the misconduct, and i think that this is a shared responsibility

i've heard from a lot of neighbors about this, the fact that you're taking away their conditional use rights by this and they don't even get a trip to the planning commission. they come straight here where all we can really do is come up mitigations and that's not the same level of input as the planning commission can use to consider. so is there anything in this or anything you talked about that might give the neighbors something more to hold on to than simply doing over mitigations? >> it's interesting, we haven't gotten those kinds of responses from neighbors. we haven't heard from one person who has had that concern. but there is a 30-day neighborhood notification as part of this application process. the application goes through a planning department review. it goes for a hearing at your commission. and there is enforcements as i said in your materials and as i have described the permit can be modified, taken away, limited, restricted based on what actually occur there is. we don't -- we didn't believe -- we come -- >> posting -- >> i'm sorry? >> by 30-day notification, do you mea

that is my majority use of private investigators myself. i respect that the news of the world also used private investigators for other stories. >> you're aware that he convicted two look ups on the dowda family long-term? >> i wasn't aware of that until two weeks ago. >> you are now. >> yes, i am. >> why did you hold a conversion from steve whitmore? >> it was 11 years ago. i've answered this question many times. but just to repeat, a mobile conversion which is finding an address from a mobile phone that is what a mobile conversion is and can be got through legitimate means. in fact, the story that you're referred to, the mobile phone was a business number and the address was widely known. >> so you can remember what the story was there? >> i've just said to you, i've read it in "the new york times." >> was that a pedophile you were after there? >> i think if we infer to the person concerned because he's been named by the guardian and "the new york times." but what i'm saying is when i use -- the very few occasions in which i use a private

the use of those corporate shuttles is included in that benefit. i did not see that in here. >> thank you for the question. you did not see it, partly because -- first of all, it is a conversation we are going to have as the process moves forward. once you talk about a framework for discussing all of these issues, that benefit has to be included. the sar was focused on impact, and putting those impacts in context, not so much on the benefits part. also, there are different angles, depending on the employer, as to whether this service is something that is employee-paid or company-paid. company shuttles are paid for by the company and salts the commitments issue. employees are already getting paid. as you can see, it is a rich topic and we will be dealing with as we move forward. commissioner mirkarimi: i look forward to seeing that delineation, whether it is employee or company-paid, or reimbursed somehow. colleagues, any further questions or comments? any public comment? >> my name is brought to cut. i work at google, and the community government af

or nurse with but to me i've sort of or the you when i hear you use. it in song that kind but not enough. i would like to stand before god as i am not sort of thought of not being sort of but if this sort of life and this song of praise here again he used to shank a famous russian poet by the way the mystery of the shank of created a museum and let's take a closer look at it all in the report by yelena to me that are from a legendary russian writer's village just outside moscow. he is the birthplace of some twentieth century russian literary masterpieces like worse buster legs dr zhivago during soviet times the village of their delk in the near moscow was home to some of the best writers of the pork these days people come here to get an idea of what inspired their favorite authors and he's a place to learn more about one of the most popular soviet and russian poets if the any of the shall go he has traveled a lot across russia and abroad reciting these poems and taking pictures almost three hundred things says look at you from the walls of his gallery t

many of us have been believers. we also, many of us were some have been -- took some heat for it but we believe some of the context were applicable to space program. what was then an aging civil we called it faster, cheaper better. i think the clinton administration morphed into a different way and that is great but we believe that there were ways to do things in space that really could give us better technology, faster and in fact been doing it better and faster it would be done more cheaply. we also wanted the aerospace industry to pivot from its focus on supplying critical national security needs to an ambitious civil space rogue ran. -- program. we been as another policy initiative, took a new launch capability. the shuttle as i said it gone through a lot of fits and starts. it is a very expensive program. magnificent technology and extraordinary capability but it was fragile and it was expensive. and with the incident of the challenger, even though they flew eight times after a return to flight eight dad in sept

of the. rest so. to learn how to use it and you use it properly and you're going to get. the united states has the biggest number of criminals there are two million inmates and just as many on the run. by not only stayed in force agencies but also bounty hunters after catching so called wanted brings in billions of dollars every year to the hunters. in the us law is a business. every year in the united states more than thirty five thousand bailed out offenders never show up to court most of them are caught by seven thousand hunters working for. tony brown is a bail bondsman established in sacramento he runs the. firm which specializes in bailing out offenders before their trials is. about the. actual bombs that we use to be our people. in the us freedom has a price the more severe the crime the bigger the bail is in order to get out of jail before trial for example cruelty towards animals is fifty thousand dollars use of firearms is twenty five thousand dollars attempted homicide is how the million dollars. he is the contract the contract stipulates. for this person goes t

international research on cancer said that is important at different research is conducted into the long-term use of mobile phones and we certainly agree with that. pending of the availability, it is pour in to take a pragmatic measures to reduce exposure. even the world health organization has said that you want to reduce your exposure in light of not having full information. the amendment to this ordinance as a great thing of making it easy to comply while at the same time increasing the level of information available because rather than just having the radiation information available on a passive level, it will be given out for each phone. >> thank you very much. >> i want to say that i appreciate the revamp of this which makes it hard to comply for the smaller businesses. thank you. >> any of the commissioners? >> i would like to ask a couple of questions. so, what has changed specifically from before. they will still have to post a sign in the store? >> that's the same. then they will have to give out information and how to reduce exposure. previously, they were required to put a notification o