and i noticed turley is here from dph. he has been a great -- charlie is here from dph. he has been a great partner in our outreach for a long time. we recently had a motorcycle accident over the weekend and the burning of a person on guerrero street. both were very shocking. not only did we do out reached in the community, but in mission statement as well, as the officers have feelings, too. what are your results in homicide in 2012? in district 11, there have been 11 homicides this year. six of those were committed in the horrific tragedy on how street. another was a murder/suicide pact very sad, an elderly couple. however, that does count as a homicide. subtracting the six, which i do not believe is indicative of the street violence which i believe we do hope to impact. i will ask commander loftus to comment on those cases. i do not want to say something that will jeopardize them. last year, there were four homicides. this year, absent the six, there have been five. one is always more than we want. when you say 11 vs four, it sounds like a tremendous increase >. super

jonathan turley is a professor of law at george washington university. us from raleigh, north carolina, however, today. so dozens of states are engaged in the fights over voter i.d. law. we saw that in the piece. and a number of reports show that voter fraud is actually not much of a problem. so is this a solution in search of a problem? >> well, actually, a national study found that voter fraud is virtually nonexistent when they looked at the 2000 election. there are over 8 million voters in pennsylvania. and only a handful of these cases. that means that the chances that your vote is going to be stolen by someone in pennsylvania is slightly above your chances of being attacked by a puma at the polling place. so the question for the court is how does it address that. the court resolved that regardless of the statements by the gop leader, that this was to deliver the state to romney, the state still had a valid reason to require photo identification. >> and what was that valid reason? because the court did not say this is an issue of constitutionality, b

. >> i ended up with a great coach by the name of john turley when told us that anything that you wantedould get through sacks. [ laughter ] >> money, fame, women, cars, i think what he was trying to say if you want the best, you have got to be the best. my dad had one rule, if he signs you up for something, you had to finish. he didn't like wasting money, you know? [ laughter ] >> i love you both. thank you for teaching me the importance of finishing what you started. >> and perhaps for the first time since he was drafted notch 1 overall in 2005, alex smith is no longer being questioned about his skills or leadership quality and coach jim harbaugh knows that san francisco is not flying under the reader after they went to the collapse game. he has several new receivers which could should last year's total with 22 td passes. last years with a break through season and like now he say clear quarterback. >> i think that feeling is still there, as much as we all talk about pressing the lead last year, i think really pressing lead, a lot of excitement going tot playoffs and 13-3 and things lik

she was with hank olsen the turley secretary under bush where they gave bankers everything.a nixon played her in a hbo movie "too big to fail" let's show you an indicative scene from that movie. >> and what do i say when they ask me why it wasn't regulated? >> no one wanted it. we were making too much money. >> you'll work on, we were making too much money. >> cenk: no, but that is exactly it. that's the crux of the real ethical problem. not strippers, not any of that nonsense. these people didn't want the regulation. mitt romney worked for those bankers, and he goes on the campaign trail and says, yeah, let's deregulate, let's deregulate. why? because they want to make more money at our expense. they keep all the money and then shove the bill to the taxpayers. michelle davis who is coming in to clean up the mess of mitt romney's private business records is exactly part that have problem. she doesn't solve the problem. she is the problem. that's a huge ethical problem. not just for the republican party but unfortunately for our entire system in washington, d.c. all right, wh

. -- megyn: even jonathan turley who is a well-known left-leaning constitutional authority wrote a piece calling the opinion well reasoned and said in his opinion it would be difficult to e reverse this on a go-forward basis. the doj doesn't like these laws at all, and they have, they get to give their stamp of approval on them. most states you pass this law, it's law. you've got to show photo id at the polls. in certain states, in particular in the south where there's been a history of the disenfranchisement of voters, the doj had to approve it up front, and it hasn't. they have come out -- and folks that are just in support of these laws, this is the reverend al sharpton -- and said this is a systematic method of blocking the vote and said they've got to continue this fight because this is all about reducing turnout, reducing turnout of legitimate minority and senior democratic voters. >> it's about reducing fraud. and to me, i can't understand. do they really believe that minorities in the united states can't get access to voter? because that's nonsense. i mean, voter id especially in

that is why they turley is an active guard -- charlie in is an active part. she went to kuwait for a year. it is why i took leave from my career as a special education teacher to support her deployment and take care of our daughter and now take care of charlie during her sickness. in spite of all of that and in spite of the fact that we are legally married, the u.s. government still tweets us as legal strangers. our government will not the best traits -- treats us as legal strangers. our government will not recognize us. we cannot afford health insurance. i am on able to get an military i.d. to have access to the facilities and services that other families automatically enjoy. when charlie and our daughter go into the base to buy groceries, i am forced to stand outside and wait for them. i cannot even go inside. our government, the one that charlie serves every day, even now with her cancer, will not provide benefits should she not win her canter battle. i need those benefits in order to care for our daughter. perhaps this is the scary is part of all. in 2008