[laughter] >> i do not know. is like -- i do not know.it is like a contact with your medium, you know? like if you shake hands. it is flesh and blood, a contact, you know? tavis: mm-hmm. >> if we have a simulation, if something is there, and then we kind of have our avatars, we are sharing an idea of, like, let's shake hands, but we have not. i think that is something that is changing. tavis: i wonder if how do i phrase this? >> cameron just be laughing at me right now. he would be like," andreeves, come on. i spend hours," but this is a different person. i am sorry to interrupt. tavis: i have some thoughts about this push to digital, and if not be pushed to, the overwhelming in brace of has to do with the fact that audiences are getting hotter and harder and harder to impress, so it is not so much even about great storytelling. i am not trying to bash the industry that you are a part of. it is not that we are not getting great story is told anymore, it is that you do not even have to do that. if you have got a great story, it is told dig

what do you need? i get bored very easily, so i like it changing, being involved for months, and then be in with a different group of people. i love being able to stop. this is one of the benefits we have in our profession. i say, "i am going to stop in six months and go and do something else," and they say, "you are so lucky. i just could not do that." and we are paid for what we enjoy doing it. some of it is very hard work. there are things, qualities you have to to do with acting. you have to be able to deal with a lot of things the business grows at you, and if you can deal with that, it is a wonderful profession. have to be an actor which have nothingtavis: you saa moment ago that raises for me a deeply philosophical question. and maybe i can learn something from you. >> i am sure. tavis: there were some his names i will not call on national television, because we can debate this, but there are a number of athletes to come to mind who are regifted and really talented, and those of us who are sport

ewing got to do anything. there is nothing you have to do. -- you ain't got to do anything. there is nothing you have to do. they get involved with other gang members and they get worse. the thing we have to do, and if we want it to work, i believe everybody is redeemable. i really believe that. [applause] it's not so, i would not be here. you know? i know i am making an impact on society. i know that. the thing we have to, as the community, -- come as as a community. that is the problem. when i am ready to go to juvenile hall, i have problems getting a pass. and i go there all the time. just to be able to make contact. the same person that is giving me the past don't want to give me a pass all of a sudden. we have to come together as a community and set aside the status, set aside the power. come together to work for a common goal to make our community better. [applause] >> there is a theme emerging, even as we are listening, about leveling the status in these collaboration's. everybody is equalized. i am hearing these words over and over again. tough love, does that help?

it is still up to me to do that? i am doing everything can. i do not know what else to do besides try to make a profit in a city that is over-taxing the and running down. [applause] >> i do think that you can do a lot through talking to your city supervisor and working through that process. i am telling you, there are ways that began help you. alcohol is a local issue on this type of matter. what we are behind would you guys want to do, whenever that is. a lot of times we do not always have statutes that make that much sense. it is partly the ways that the laws have evolved and we are the ones who are stuck with enforcing them the way that they are. that does not necessarily mean that we think they are particularly good ideas, but we certainly want people to grow, prosper, and be saved. that can be achieved in all sorts of ways. we want to work with you on that. thank you. >> i was the founding president of the entertainment commission. i retired and went on to found the culture association, the first trade association statewide for night life

we do those things institutions always say they want to do. we want to get crazy and cross- disciplinary around the shop. let's sit on the floor. let's play foosball. but if you let people loose in an environment -- people will always give to a greater gift. it is just a principle. if a group get together to give a gift to an entire city, it is easy to find people who will give to that. and the consequence is, you can learn a lot. talk about a networking opportunity. but nobody ever went there to network. they went out there to give their energy, imagination, their heart to something. >> there is that collaboration, the cross-disciplinary thing that happens out there, but i also feel like there is a bit of a sense of competition. people are trying to outdo each other, try to outdo each other trt impressive thing. >> that is human nature. i read a few years ago somebody complaining, i remember the good old days. you could put up a pink flamingo in front of your tent and it was cool. now with all of these big projects, i feel few tile -- futile.

what do you do? >>guest: the question is, especially when you look at the government of egypt, the muslim brotherhood, obtaining power there, that is a very troublesome development. that's where i think the united states and our foreign policy will have to take heed whether that government is going to recognize u.s. interests, will recognize the fact that we believe the best route forward is for egypt to recognize its agreement and peace treaty with our ally, israel, can we stand up against extremism. we have to stand up against islamic extremism that wants to overthrow everything we are about if that region as well as at home. >>neil: let's move to a less onerous issue. you had a bipartisan event where you were doing the inaugural inaugural...what do they call it? i am watching you -- yes, the lot form. i am watching you and nancy pelosi, a bipartisan event. she could not get the nail in there. what was going on? >>guest: she was being general tell with the nail but in the end speaker boehner and he

>> do not know. just is. >> i have no idea what i have. >> the scripture says dybbuk, the he ruled -- the hebrew word for demon. >> what does this thing want with my daughter? >> the spirit is the taker of children. >> who am i? >> once the box is opened, people die. >> daddy! >> family! -- emily! >> doctors cannot help, can they? >> the most high -- i will trust in him. under his wings, you will be protected. he will cover you. his truth -- [screaming] let my daughter go! ♪ ♪ >> i saw something in her. >> leave them wanting more. that's what happened. tavis: yeah, i think i've taken full possession of this film. [laughter] >> you don't even need to see it now. tavis: yeah. i was saying to kyra while the clip was running, is there anything left for you guys to want to go see? it's like i've seen the whole movie. speaking of which, this is the kind of thing -- i'm gonna tell her myself. i have to see this like in the middle of the day at like high noon. scary movies and i just don't -- >> you know, yo

i do not want it. i have enough of my own. >> i hope you will be sharp enough to answer the questions the audience has for you. rather like the academy awards. [applause] these questions have come through on various means. can we have the first question? >> the first question -- i am going to compile a group -- a lot of people are asking what is currently inspiring new? from different cultures, the internet, textile design -- what exciting things are you seeing in contemporary textile design? and what are you reading? >> definitely, that is very sad, but i have not enough time to read. that is the very sad part. so i'm not enough reading, but i'm getting older and getting closer. now that nobody is doing any more reading, i will read. no, i think honestly, it is a question of time, but reading, to bring inspiration, but that is the problem. i get into a book and say that i can make a collection of that after, like, three lines. one time i did an existentialist collection years ago, and i was thinking,

do. and as you all know, cal trans covers the entire state of california. and in order to better manage that, we have broken down the department into 12 districts just like the city has different districts. that helps us in being closer to the community. helps us in increasing the utilization of the small businesses, disadvantage businesses and disabled enterprise businesses. the department manages 50,000 lane miles of highway, 22,000 employees statewide. my operation here in district 4, it covers the nine bay area counties. as you can see in the map. which is about 7,000 lane miles of highway. we have the toll bridges that we operate. we have just under 4,000 employees. our budgets, our capital program ongoing at the present time with 155 contracts, it's about 4.6 billion. so there's a lot of work that is going on, and a lot of that is due to the toll bridge program. half of that is the repair of the various toll bridges that we have, and of course the biggest project, one of the largest

that's what we do. in cal bo training, it's only the basic idea how to deal with the upcoming changes and so forth. because training is very expensive, i think it's three days for training. * extensive the passing rate is roughly 40%, engineering exam, you know, take long time to get them through. but our intention is only doing a advisory role. don't want to go into all have -- individual business to order inspection, but we will try and give them the training in the future how to deal with it. of course, we would like to as much pass inspectors [speaker not understood] department. even we have a l.a. department to come to our department to see how we operate. i think they told us they have still [speaker not understood] in their certification for cat inspector. president also attend a meeting, too, you know. we are actually ahead of lots of people in the state. >> yeah, to kind of hitch hike off that, which was surprising to me, i thought we would have been, but l.a., they were very clear on this. i t

, do, do, do >> bill: thanks for staying with us.hot topics, beginning with another unbelievable aclu campaign. this one in michigan. they're asking a federal judge to prohibit a checkoff box on voting registration applications that asserts the person voting is a citizen of the united states. they don't want that. here now, attorneys of fox news analyst kimberly gill guilfoyle and his wheel. who is it going to hurt and suppress? >> suppress everybody in michigan because everyone will be confused. >> bill: confused. >> are you a u.s. citizen? >> bill: that's going to confuse nerve. >> that's what the aclu is saying. i hate to agree with you. i hate it. >> bill: this is just madness and stupidity. >> yes. >> bill: more aclu taking up the time of the courts. >> they're saying the process -- >> due process. >> confuse the issue, which you have to say you're an american citizen. >> bill: you know why they're doing this, don't you? >> of course, because they want to make sure that the some odd 4,000 people that they believe are registered

what do we do?, i think we begin the process and work with other nations to sit there and say, we need to put the i.a. back in there on the ground and these are the consequences whether it is complete isolation, whether it means at some point we do a blockade, there are a public of options available to us other than boots on the ground. the reality is, the prime minister binyamin netanyahu is very cheer today in saying the intelligence is not perfect. we will never know. we will only know how were nuclear material they building and they are at a point to build a bomb. that is measurable. if we cannot measure it because they do not want to put us on the ground we need to start throwing our weight, whether it is economically, diplomatically or militarily to get other nations to understand that is a red line. we will not cross i. we will not do it. we cannot suffer the paralysis of a presidential election coming up, jeopardizing not genetic israel's national security but the prime minister said, a nucl

what made evaded you to do this? >> but what motivated you to do this? >> good morning, so glad to be here. i want to thank you for inviting me to this panel. giving honor to god for allowing me to be here today to do this work. if it was not for him, i could not be here. i do this work, at it is not just me, it is over 300 families that we represent in san francisco alone. the reason why i do this. i do it because my son was murdered in the western addition july 17, 1996, a day before his oldest son, at the age of 5, his birthday was the next day. this is the reason why i do it. 300 family is, over 350 families in san francisco alone that i know personally, that are members of the healing circle, cases have not been solved. she lost three sons to gun violence in the month of august. that is the reason why i do. i do it because betty cooper lost two sons in the bay view to violence. it still remains unsolved. in 1996, when my son was killed, 96 homicides in san francisco. everybody seemed to think that it was just another day in my community. no one knew

you. >> i will do my best to do some highlights of the evidence here. the heart of these charges has always been the sheriff's crime and his conviction and sentence for those charges, and the consequences of that for his office. we also have a course of conduct that follows that included acts of witness dissuasion -- i should say, not just follows, but actions that were wrapped up in that. witness dissuasion, and actions that reader deceitful or abused his trust or did not comport with his responsibility with law enforcement. but the heart of the charge has always been the domestic violence. >> you talk about the evidence? i do not need to hear your evidence for the physical abuse. it would be helpful to me if he would point me specifically to the evidence of which is dissuasion in particular -- which has dissuasion in particular, and also the evidence of using his official powers to try to obtain custody of his child. and thirdly, the evidence that his statements to the police were willfully -- what was the term you used? willfully misleading. i want t

can do better. the way to do better is not to tax and spend, but to retrain and get the control of the mandatory programs. i am much more apt mystic about this country than some. >> mr. perot -- mr. perot, you have one minute, sir. >> well, the defense is going to have to convert to industries. the sooner they start the sooner they'll finish. there will be a significant. it is important not to let the industrial base deteriorate. we had someone who i regret said it, in the president staff said he doesn't care if we made potato chips or computer chips, anybody that cares about it, care as great deal. you make more computer chips and 19 ouof 20 chips have come from japan. as we face these industries, there isa lot of intelletalent here. that's where the high pas are. we need a very carefully thought through phase. we practice 19th century capitolism. the rest, 21st capitolism. i can't handle at in a minute, but i hope to get ck to it later. the countries and businesses to work togetr in an intelligent

this is what we do and how we do what we do. it is my vision to have some kind of special team in place in the department that focuses in understands my life. we are a little bit of a ways off, but that is what i would like to do. >> how can a new club owner in gauge so they know the rules and regulations and what is expected of them? >> essentially, we tend to reach out to club owners. there are 3600 licenses within 49 square miles. the director will tell you it is the largest in the state. so, for the inspectors assigned to that unit's, we tried to engage them to open up. i agree with the gentleman at the end. security is paramount. we feel that as the police department, we want you to please yourself. as the commander mentioned, we are well trained. we do not come out there as police officers. we are into education and training. we are not looking to enforce. we tried to instill the idea that the security plan is paramount, providing the framework by which an establishment protect itself from inappropriate behavior and crimin

do what we have to do, even if we do not like it." you have to explain what you're doing and why. are to be built -- buildup to the tune of 100 billion euros of taxpayer money. but it will be politically sensitive. tens of thousands were encouraged to buy shares of the banks and they could lose a lot. the crucial question for madrid remains the conditions on the sovereign bailout. germany wants them taw. spain's man on the european commission begs to differ. -- germany wants them taw. >> it is about the different obligations or commitments. that is relevant. >> you do not think spain need any additional substantive austerity measures imposed from outside? >> where we are right now, i don't think so. i think what spain needs is to regain confidence in the way those recommendations have been implemented. >> even if spain weights and protests, the pro-euro political class sees this as a way to go forward. there have been strong calls for a rapid fiscal union, political union, and calls here in britain for a referendum. >> what we need is

so what do we do? yeah, yeah, yeah. >> but it is manly. >> jimmy: i always need a few drinks before i get a little pork. >> bourbon. [ laughter ] i tried to give it to you. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: i know that, yeah. thank god security was there, yeah. >> all right. ginger beer. >> jimmy: ginger beer. okay, good. >> ginger syrup. this is a ginger simple syrup. >> jimmy: okay, good. just sugar boiled with water -- >> sugar, water and ginger, equal parts. >> jimmy: okay, lovely. >> that goes in there. >> jimmy: yup. >> we're going to give this -- you want to shake it? >> jimmy: sure, of course. >> i mean, i'm gonna give you some pork -- [ laughter ] >> jimmy: yeah, yeah, yeah. okay, all right. here we go. so, i'm shaking this dude up. >> and then, you pour it right in here with these pickled cherries. >> jimmy: now, what do you mean, pickled cherries? >> well, i pickled cherries some cherries, but you can use maraschino cherries, too. so, -- >> jimmy: well, i probably would, right? a pickled cherry. does i

how do you do that? go to fox news.com/red eye. you ask too many questions, viewer. >>> i will see you back here at 5:00 p.m. eastern time for "the five." we have ambassador bolten and brooke goldstein and jesse joyce. >>> back to tv's andy levy. >> tell us about the upcoming gigs of yours. >> well, andy, it will be fun filled, and bring the whole family. there is a lot of seats. you can bring the whole family and have two empty seats in between. it is thanks to the kids. we are working on a new hour. it is none of what you saw on the epic special. it should be choppy and unprepared. >> i have seen your performances. they are family friendly. >> i will be like a hooker reference and say look at him. >> the man son family. >> jedediah, a new column out this week? >> yes, late they are week. i don't know what it is about. go to jedediah bila.com. >> do something on obama. >> maybe about impeaching obama. i don't know. >> or something about sarah palin maybe. >> something i have never written about before. new turf. >> what are you up

what do we do as first responders. when we come up do we use our walkie talkies or radio? no. you go to a hard wire phone, call it in and get the information back because it may detonate that using the radio frequency. remember we talked about suspected terrorism is a stop sign for you as nerts. you do not want to get hurt. any questions on the terrorism? bnice is not nice. incident takes place, it takes place here on the left side, this is called the hot zone. you obviously want to be in the cold zone. first responders, we're going to come up to our staging area in the warm area and start moving to get to the incident. you want to be in what zone? the cold zone. uphill, upwind. you believe you have chemicals on your skin or clothing, obviously time is critical. remove everything from your body, wash your hands, flush your body with water. your safety is no. 1. direct contact with treating victims can expose you to contaminants. these people coming out of the bart might have been exposed to something, do you want to go and start touching them? do you want to let them leave? yo

we might get closer by doing it.et, i think you are right that we would still have a preferred pathway or recommended analysis. it may be that there is a footnote that says, even if you go this way, here is how we thought about it. that could become part of the later interpretation and could help people. if the supervisors go back to try to parsed this out. chairperson hur: i think that is a good point. >> it would be as close as we can to what you want, but it would be a way to find differences. commissioner renne: i am not sure the results in this case is any different. what i am concerned about is that this commission sends a message to the elected officials. you can do anything you want if it is not in relation to your duties. i think there is at( provision that puts a higher standard on our elected officials than just how they conduct themselves vis a vis their official duties. chairperson hur: that is a fair point, but the countervailing view is -- i have not seen any evidence suggesting to me that the mayor ha

i love to do it. also my training, my training was doing this. i do not have my gaultier touch at that time. so then it was like to make jean paul gaultier for ermez. no, sorry, to make ermez through the eyes of jean paul gaultier. i love that. then there was a death. it was seven years after our collaboration. i think it was good to go in, because my life was not with ermez. it was for my own company. so we changed. we pushed. spanish rudes, perfume routes. sounds very good to my ears. i am a quite truthful person >. >> is there always going to be a controversial side of jean paul gaultier? there was a time when you were inspired by rabbis. i believe you're in new york, there were a bunch of rabbis he saw walking by the public library, you turned it into a collection. you must have known this was dramatic and would be alarming to people. >> i should say that in some way, i think i have a kind of innocence. like that is not that big part of me. when it is beautiful, i believe in it. i saw it was beautiful. i wanted to show it. for me, it was so s

it is not about the book, it is about what do you do about the death threats. tavis: what did you learn about yourself? >> a lot of things. first of all, i learned about a lot of weaknesses and things i wish i would have done better and so on, and i have tried to chronicle lows. but i learned that i was tougher than i thought. if you had told me in february 1989, here is what is going to happen to you, and it is going to go on for 12 years, and it will be like this, how do you think it would be 12 years from now? coming up the other and reasonably in one piece, i think i am reasonably in one piece, so it is one of those things about life. sometimes the most difficult questions, we do not know the answer until we are asked, until we are put in the situation. we do not know how we will deal with it. but somehow, i was resilient enough to deal with it. tavis: it is pretty obvious for those of us who are avid readers, but why "joseph anton"? >> i invented this from conrad and chekhov. chekhov is a great poet of melancholy and alienation and people trapped in one pl

have to do. you don't get away without that. you get the tougher question. how might the media do a better job of informing this debate? we seem to have a disconnect between what is said and what is reported and the american public's understanding. it hits a lot of issues whether it is policy or budget trends. recent data showed roughly almost half of americans don't realize we have the world's largest defense budget. a pretty odd phenomena in. >> thanks. in terms of what he will do i think he will reduce the size of the military. the next president. makes it harder to do either one. a president romney would reduce the pace of cuts. i don't think he has the money to do everything he is proposing. on the campaign platform he wants to hold the gdp at 4% which over time would be a large difference between him and president obama but i don't put that in the same category as more specific suggestions he has offered but either president would cut some ground force. either president is going to have a h

we didn't do that. and you know, you scratch your head as to whether you did everything that was possible. and then maybe we could have done, got a bit more with real media campaign, now that we are into it. and bosnia, in veb veb we didn't have have the forces, when we were given the pan date. and by the way, i wasn't the secretary-general thenment but when we were given the mandate maybe we should have said we cannot do this without the resources that are need. but of course, you get your mandate from the council. and they can easily for example, one of the reasons if you set up a safe haven to try and protect the people and then you come in and ask for 35,000 troops, and say nobody's going to give you that number of troops, and they pick the lowest number of troops and then amend the resolution to say the soldiers should use the oppressers to disuede attacks which is quite different from protecting. and so you set yourselves up and also set the people up giving them a sense of security when one doesn

that is all we were asked to do and tasked to do. so for that reason i am also not inclined to take a vote that i probably don't see that we are authorized to do, to make some kind of recommendation that isn't found in the charter or isn't grounded in the charter. >> mr. hemblig, do you have a view on this? >> i stated my view at the last meeting. i believe that the mayor has discretion about whether to bring charges. but the charter spells out what decision is required of this body and that is to decide whether or not to sustain those charges. that doesn't mean that there would be anything unlawful about you making other recommendations, but what the charter asks of the ethics commission is does it find that the charges are sustained? and what it asks of the board of supervisors is the same question and if three-quarters of the board of supervisors vote to sustain the charges, then there is no discretion on the penalty. the penalty is removal from office. so i think the charter anticipates a decision here on whether or not to sustai

we do?rter of president obama, gave money to the democrats. you switched. do you believe mitt romney can create 12 million jobs? >> mitt romney doesn't create 12 million jobs. >> yes. >> we know from the study of history that the only thing that creates a better life is the demand for labor it has created in the private sector. if the government is going to hire everybody it is called communism. put everybody in the army, postal department, agricultural department. preposterous and ridiculous you can the government makes a lousy deem on labor contracts. >> you told me privately, there's money sitting on the side, guys like you. >> 2 or 3 interest. >> 2 or 3 trillion. why is it on the side what is going to get back in the game? >> what president obama can do, what we've got in the white house today is a first rate campaigner around a great speechmaker and he is charming. >> ouch. >> a nice man. he is a nice man. but this world, it's what you do not what you say. we have become so fascinated w

what we have to do. as far as our officers, any location is certified by the state, and they are all insured. >> i have one question. i have no doubt this is going to be run as a great business. the guy upstairs is talking about ambiance around -- ambient sound going out onto the street. is the ceiling the floor of an apartment upstairs? >> it is not an apartment. it is a business. >> the house band will be what kind? >> approximately 8:00 in the evening. we do have a sound technician here. >> i am good with it. >> do you want to hear from him? >> we will have a public comment, and if you are finished we will hear from the police department. if they want to enter into this. >> good evening. as far as the gold dust, central station does not oppose the permit. they have a 47-year record of performing real well. i even spoke with officer torres, and he says we are really sorry to see them go, so i think it is a good fit. i have spoken with snake about the concerns i could come up with. -- with nick about th

do you think president obama would do that? i don't. >> and by the way, thank you for the inview station to join "the five" on occasion. i appreciate that. i can't imagine that obama or the advisors would actually okay that. there has been talk about it. >> i can't imagine in this environment they would do something so stupid. that man should not see the light of day. >> baker, were you even paying attention to the question? >> i tried to make a point. >> he may see the warmth of the sun. but that's as far as it goes. >> could i get off that last comment? the idea that somehow the video caused this or the cartoons are causing it. i am just not buying that crap. that attack in benghazi was very well planned. they did surveillance and had sources inside. >> not according to ambassador. people don't carry around rpg's. >> i kind of think they do. that would not surprise me. the kids have ak-47's instead of baby rattlers. >> there are enough weapons floating around benghazi in that area to support that theory. in all honesty, the f

what do we do? do you take them? that are presented in public comment?ing with it. >> john malamut, city attorney's office. áthe city attorney's office represents the city through the appointed boards and commissions and elected officialsxlj city departments. so, we don't respond affirmatively to allegations that are made at public meetings jj of the public. if, on the other hand, the dbi director approached our office to discuss a matter likezu thar a commissioner did, then we would go to the director or the commissioner in that way. we are also involved to some extent with complaints, and these are the ways the public -- éqfif it were largely a complete about the city, our office would get involved -- a complaint about the city, our office would get involved. but generally not from public comment. commissioner walker: generally, i think this deserves looking into. i am not saying whether it is valid or not. but any allegations like that r by somebody. we dosy not have the capacity to doñ] it as a commission. so, i am not certain how to proceed. ñrcom

how do i do that? >> this is a really simple question. go to a set of users.hem what they would be willing to pay. don't give them any indication of what you are thinking. ask them what would you be willing to pay for a service like this? it is already better to start low. don't have someone spend a lot of money as you are still figuring things out. make it less expensive. as the product gets better, you can add bells and whistles and features and raise the price. >> my thought would be to start with something capped and then for the people that are hitting their cap, go to them and see if this is a service that they have an appetite for. >> finally, here is a question about thinking and acting big. >> small business is all the buzz. how do you have the cache of a small business and provide the confidence of a large or larger entity? >> in some ways, i feel like that's not even an issue anymore. so many people like working with small businesses. >> i think that for most people that have been frustrated working with a small business, it can really be traced bac

does anyone have the political will out there to do it? >> no. no, they do not. they do not. certainly not between now and election time. melissa: what about after the election? >> we don't know. all depend who wins. we've seen what happened with one administration. frankly they didn't address these issues which was really the sad part of what they came into office with. they did not really solve any of the major problems we faced with as a country. melissa: i don't know if anyone has the political will to address it even after the election that is my fear. >> i disagree with you. melissa: good. >> a president who addresses this issue will actually enhance his political standing. we are looking into this country for political leadership. we didn't get it. we know we need it. it is only way you can get anything done as ronald reagan did with tip o'neill, the democratic speaker of the house when they reformed and revamped social security in 1983 when it was about to go bust. we need that bipartisan relationship. this administration has no relationship with people on the other s

what we need to do is maximize the attractiveness of doing it and minimize the risks of doing it.n do that. and if you look at it, president bush, when he took office -- the second president bush -- i'll never forget. he said, you know the names of every street in the old city and look where it got you. i'm not going to fool with this now. immediately the death rate went up among israelis and palestinians because there was nothing going on. then he got aggressively involved. condi rice practically lived on an airplane going back and forth to the middle east and new possibilities opened up. they devised a negotiation around this roadmap concept. they didn't make peace, but meanwhile the palestinian government was more stable, they produced more prosperity. when the israelis took action against gaza and hamas, the west bank was calm all because things were happening, and there was an understanding, a level of trust. so i think kicking the can down the road is an error. i also think that with all foreign policy conflicts, i like to say there's -- you've got to decide whether a foreig

what i'm gonna do? what i'm gonna do? how do we start that? thanks for bailing me out again, lee. what are we talking about-- i'm self-conscious when this camera is on me. thcell is getting bigger and bigger. huh? the cell is getting bigger and bigger. oh, yeah. [laughter] you guys get freaked out with this thing looking at you -how about me, yeah? [laughter] the living cell gets bigger and bigger, right? let's suppose the living cell gets double the size. slig, uh-huh-- what do we got here, gang? [laughter] what do we got here? trouble. i've got a tablecloth. i've got a tablecloth with no lip, okay? - no. - watch this. those dishes are essentially at rest, aren't they? here's something for you to do this weekend when you finally get invited to your friend's house for dinner, okay? and the friend wants to know, what are you doing, what are you doing at school? you can kind of show him this, right? you don't wanna try this at your own house, not with your own dishes, okay? you might mess--but you try them at your friend's house. how about this, gang? what's gonna happen if i pull t

top editors would say, what do you want to do. i was taken by want to be a general assignment reporter. .. >> guest: it became clear to me that i was thought of as someone who was a dab hand with a turn rily a clear to me that i was thought of as someone clear tohf me that there was a turn of taught tot i was that. and i realized that i was goingr to make my way, to where ever,c. that i was going to have to to convince them that i could do that, too. so i have to go to the ccity hl and i covered the first twostran years of un. the administration, which was so much fun. ike berger in the '30s. it's the most fun because twice a week you do reporting on anything you want in new york city. and it's supposed to be written in a kind of a distinctive literary voice. and so that was a wonderful assignment. and then i became deputy metropolitan editor, a stint which was interrupted by not one, but two maternity leaves. and, um, when i came back, i realized that i was not going to be able to hold it together with two little boys under 2 and

not have the resources to do the fact checking they would like to do or we would like them to do. particularly in this new economy. how you respond to those tv stations or to those newspapers to say, yes, we would like to do this, but we do not have the resources? >> let me first say we have partnered with primarily newspapers, but also with public radio in 11 states. we have found a very successful way to scale fact checking. we now have 11 state politifact sites where we have trained journalists at newspapers and new hampshire public radio how to do fact checking. they do it. it does not have to be a big organization. they do not have to put up multiple people. our smallest partner is the "nashua telegraph," a newspaper with about a circulation of 17,000, and they do great fact checking on the leaders of new hampshire. we have 36 full-time fact checkers around the country. we've talked to tv stations. none have been willing to make a commitment to it yet, but i can see that happening. tell them to call me. >> also, sort of a partial answer -- when campaigns put out new ads, the

she will never do it again. >> bob: what did she do?>> dana: what if you do find something you don't want to know? maybe it's better to find out than not. >> bob: that's how i got divorced. find my wife's cell phone and she had 450 calls to one guy. >> dana: to a lawyer? >> bob: no, that's why we got divorced. that's how i found out. snooped on the cell phone. good deal i did. >> andrea: you're the biggest snooper at the table. >> bob: i am. you didn't answer my question. are you or are you not staying in the guest room? >> andrea: biggest pet peeves everybody? greg? >> greg: my biggest pet peeve is word pet peeve. it's not a pet. i also don't like murder. >> dana: i have lots of them. but my current one is there is a guy at the gym i go on tuesday, thursday mornings and she is a muscle head. he wears headphones and he talks on the phone while he is working out. then he takes the huge -- i done know how big they are, but've pounds doing bicep curl and throw them on the ground and it makes noise. >> eric: that is what we do. >> greg: tal

one of the traditions is a dance that we do. boys and girls, what do you do? what we do. >> the cuban shuffle. >> come to the middle if you are going to do the cuban shuffle. this is a dance that we do. parents, teachers, come on up. ♪ >> just a few steps away from union square is a quiet corner stone of san francisco's our community to the meridian gallery has a 20-year history of supporting visual arts. experimental music concert, and also readings. >> give us this day our daily bread at least three times a day. and lead us not into temptation to often on weekdays. [laughter] >> meridians' stands apart from the commercial galleries around union square, and it is because of their core mission, to increase social, philosophical, and spiritual change my isolated individuals and communities. >> it gives a statement, the idea that a significant art of any kind, in any discipline, creates change. >> it is philosophy that attracted david linger to mount a show at meridian. >> you want to feel like your work this summer that it can do some good. i felt like at merid

you see, the real question is isn't what do we do? it's why do we do it?u able to reach down missed and not give up? why am i able to against all odds go i'm going to do this and i don't care nobody -- what makes me be that warrior? i don't quite know how to answer that, but all of us in our own way, it's this thing of we're iffing to do this? where does that come from? >> the common thing is it came from your parents. it's in us, but it's also taught to us. when we come back, each one of you, what year will be our first female president? >> that's easy. >> i think that's easy too. but one dark stormy evening... she needed a good meal and a good family. so we gave her purina cat chow complete. it's the best because it has something for all of our cats! and after a couple of weeks she was part of the family. we're so lucky that lucy picked us. [ female announcer ] purina cat chow complete. and for a delicious way to help maintain a healthy weight, try new purina cat chow healthy weight. thor's couture gets the most rewards of any small business credit card.

jarod: do you have birds that talk? wendy: i do, i do, jarod.h, she wants to talk to us now. jarod: she's been talking the entire time. wendy: her name is pepper! jarod: this is pepper? wendy: she is 27 years old. i adopted her when she was 15, and she's, quite frankly, the diva of the family. so she has to have her very special goody popcorn. hey, pepper, would you like to say hello? pepper: hi, pepper! wendy: there you go. jarod: wow. wendy: very nice. now this took four years to get her to do this on cue. jarod: to get her to say, 'hi, pepper.' wendy: she said it all on her own when i first adopted her, but to get her on cue, that's a whole other story. jarod: right. wendy: yeah. jarod: now, to train a bird to go on cue for talking, i mean, obviously, you know, the food again. you reward her after she does it. but how do you get her to -- that's my question. i mean, is it all about like you give her like a command? or how does that work? wendy: well, what it is, is you listen. jarod: mm-hm. wendy: and when they make a sound you like, you rein

what the president wants me to do, the president wants me to do, the president wants me to do -- >>> contact mr. kaine and tell him what virginia doesn't need is another obama clone in the senate. >>> george allen, what's wrong with washington. majority pac is responsible for the content of this advertising. >>> so my question is, viewers and voters can't possibly know who's manipulating them then. what does that mean to representative government? >> well, and there are two problems there. i think one is, you're absolutely right, we won't know, but the candidate probably will. you know, i can assure you that if in that senate race someone is spending millions of dollars to elect the candidate, the candidate knows where that money is coming from. there's nothing illegal about telling them. it's illegal to actually sit down with them and show them the ad and say, "do you want to edit it before i run it?" but that's about the limits there. so they're going to know who the money is behind it. someone can go to them and say, "don't have to say a word, i'm going to help you out, i'm going

we do not do appointment television. but as for the he went into the family room and watched television. it does not happen anymore. not for most programming. what people want to do now is watch what they want to watch, where they want to watch it, when they want to watch it, and a device they want to watch it on. tv everywhere is enabling back customer vision, giving customers the opportunity to time delayed their television watching, what it on demand, started in the living room, and it in the bedroom. watch it on their tablet or on their smartphone or on their big screen television. in the broadest sense, that is television everywhere. if you narrow to be everywhere and you referred to the time warner/comcast announcements about a business model for television viewing, this is about taking the contents that customers paid for once in their cable subscriptions or their google fibered subscriptions. giving people the opportunity to take that television that they're already paying for and to watch it everywhere they want

what made evaded you to do this? >> but what motivated you to do this? >> good morning, so glad to be here. i want to thank you for inviting me to this panel. giving honor to god for allowing me to be here today to do this work. if it was not for him, i could not be here. i do this work, at it is not just me, it is over 300 families that we represent in san francisco alone. the reason why i do this. i do it because my son was murdered in the western addition july 17, 1996, a day before his oldest son, at the age of 5, his birthday was the next day.